pmc logo image
Logo of brjopthalBritish Journal of OphthalmologyCurrent TOCInstructions for authors

Formats:

Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 October; 80(10): 890–894.
PMCID: PMC505643
Penetrating keratoplasty in Africa: graft survival and visual outcome.
D Yorston, M Wood, and A Foster
Kikuyu Hospital, Kenya.
Abstract
AIM: To study the survival and visual outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in an African setting. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 216 corneal grafts, performed on 203 eyes of 186 patients, at Kikuyu Hospital, Kenya over a 5 year period. RESULTS: Half of the transplants were carried out for keratoconus with only 5% of the grafts being undertaken for corneal scarring caused by trachoma or measles. The average follow up was 27.3 months. The probability of graft survival at 2 years was 87.4% (95% CI 80.6%-94.3%) for keratoconus and 64.7% (95% CI 54.8%-74.6%) for other corneal pathologies. Forty seven grafts (21.8%) in 36 patients (17.7%) are known to have become opaque. The commonest causes of graft opacification were bacterial keratitis (6.0%), endothelial failure (6.0%), and graft rejection (5.1%). Preoperatively 55% of keratoconus eyes and 75.7% of non-keratoconus eyes were blind. Postoperatively, 5% of keratoconus eyes and 41.7% of the non-keratoconus eyes were blind. Normal vision was achieved in 53.7% of operated eyes. Grafts carried out for keratoconus had a better visual outcome than grafts performed for other corneal pathologies. Preoperatively, 12.4% of keratoconus and 48.5% of non-keratoconus patients were blind in their better eye. Postoperatively, 1.1% of keratoconus patients and 25.7% of non-keratoconus patients were blind. The number of patients with normal vision in the better eye increased from 32 (17.2%) to 106 (57.0%). Sight was restored to 34 blind patients, but two patients with severe visual impairment preoperatively were blind at their last follow up. There was therefore a net reduction of 32 in the number of blind patients after 216 keratoplasties. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating keratoplasty can be successful in Africa, particularly for keratoconus and other corneal dystrophies. However, penetrating keratoplasty has a limited role in the treatment of blindness from corneal scarring due to trachoma, measles, and vitamin A deficiency for which community based preventive measures must remain the priority.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (904K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Holland S. How do we restore and maintain a clear cornea in a poor rural villager? Penetrating keratoplasty in developing countries and international eye banking. Refract Corneal Surg. 1991 Nov–Dec;7(6):417–418. [PubMed]
  • Faal H, Minassian D, Sowa S, Foster A. National survey of blindness and low vision in The Gambia: results. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;73(2):82–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Foster A, Gilbert C. Community efforts in the reduction of corneal blindness in developing countries. Refract Corneal Surg. 1991 Nov–Dec;7(6):445–448. [PubMed]
  • Foster A, Yorston D. Corneal ulceration in Tanzanian children: relationship between measles and vitamin A deficiency. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Jul–Aug;86(4):454–455. [PubMed]
  • Taylor HR, West SK, Mmbaga BB, Katala SJ, Turner V, Lynch M, Muñoz B, Rapoza PA. Hygiene factors and increased risk of trachoma in central Tanzania. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Dec;107(12):1821–1825. [PubMed]
  • Kirkness CM, Ficker LA, Steele AD, Rice NS. The success of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 5):673–688. [PubMed]
  • Sharif KW, Casey TA. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1971-1990. Eye (Lond) 1993;7(Pt 4):485–488. [PubMed]
  • Yorston D, Foster A. Herpetic keratitis in Tanzania: association with malaria. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992 Oct;76(10):582–585. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Paglen PG, Fine M, Abbott RL, Webster RG., Jr The prognosis for keratoplasty in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 1982 Jun;89(6):651–654. [PubMed]
  • Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA, Easty DL, Rogers CA. Corneal graft survival and visual outcome. A multicenter Study. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators. Ophthalmology. 1994 Jan;101(1):120–127. [PubMed]
  • Kirkness CM, Ezra E, Rice NS, Steele AD. The success and survival of repeat corneal grafts. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 1):58–64. [PubMed]
  • Bates AK, Kirkness CM, Ficker LA, Steele AD, Rice NS. Microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 1):74–78. [PubMed]
  • Williams KA, Ash JK, Pararajasegaram P, Harris S, Coster DJ. Long-term outcome after corneal transplantation. Visual result and patient perception of success. Ophthalmology. 1991 May;98(5):651–657. [PubMed]