![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2004, The American Society for Cell Biology Estradiol Abrogates Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Cells through Inactivation of BAD: Ras-dependent Nongenomic Pathways Requiring Signaling through ERK and Akt ![]() Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Comparative and Experimental Medicine Program, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37920 Keith Yamamoto, Monitoring Editor * Corresponding author. E-mail address: jwimalas/at/utk.edu. Received November 17, 2003; Revised April 16, 2004; Accepted April 18, 2004. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Estrogens such as 17-β estradiol (E2) play a critical role in sporadic breast cancer progression and decrease apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Our studies using estrogen receptor-positive MCF7 cells show that E2 abrogates apoptosis possibly through phosphorylation/inactivation of the proapoptotic protein BAD, which was rapidly phosphorylated at S112 and S136. Inhibition of BAD protein expression with specific antisense oligonucleotides reduced the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-α, H2O2, and serum starvation in causing apoptosis. Furthermore, the ability of E2 to prevent tumor necrosis factor-α-induced apoptosis was blocked by overexpression of the BAD S112A/S136A mutant but not the wild-type BAD. BAD S112A/S136A, which lacks phosphorylation sites for p90RSK1 and Akt, was not phosphorylated in response to E2 in vitro. E2 treatment rapidly activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K)/Akt and p90RSK1 to an extent similar to insulin-like growth factor-1 treatment. In agreement with p90RSK1 activation, E2 also rapidly activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase, and this activity was down-regulated by chemical and biological inhibition of PI-3K suggestive of cross talk between signaling pathways responding to E2. Dominant negative Ras blocked E2-induced BAD phosphorylation and the Raf-activator RasV12T35S induced BAD phosphorylation as well as enhanced E2-induced phosphorylation at S112. Chemical inhibition of PI-3K and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 inhibited E2-induced BAD phosphorylation at S112 and S136 and expression of dominant negative Ras-induced apoptosis in proliferating cells. Together, these data demonstrate a new nongenomic mechanism by which E2 prevents apoptosis. INTRODUCTION The growth of human and animal tumors is a balance between cellular proliferation and death. Cell death in tumors occurs through necrosis and apoptosis, and highly malignant tumors often have high rates of both apoptosis and necrosis (Gompel et al., 2000 ). Thus, it is not surprising that mitogenic substances such as insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) also serve as cellular survival factors and are able to decrease rates of apoptosis. Estrogens, in particular 17-β estradiol (E2), are well-characterized mitogens for mammary tissues and epithelial cells of the female reproductive tract. Whereas estrogens exert antiapoptotic influence in neurons (Zhang et al., 2001 ), epithelial cells of the female reproductive tract (Leung and Wang, 1999 ; Choi et al., 2001 ), immune system, blood cells, and endothelial cells (Bynoe et al., 2000 ; Haynes et al., 2000 ), they also have significant apoptotic effects on certain classes of bone-derived cells (Hughes et al., 1996 ; Kameda et al., 1997 ) and some immune system cells (Zajchowski and Hoffman-Goetz, 2000 ; Okasha et al., 2001 ). Furthermore, in some estrogen receptor (ER)-negative cells, overexpression of ER often leads to apoptosis (Kushner et al., 1990 ) perhaps through activation of p38MAPK (Srivastava et al., 1999 , and references therein). Whereas E2 promotes cell survival in ER-positive cells both in cell culture and in xenograft models, antiestrogens induce apoptosis in both ER-positive and ER-negative cells (Srivastava et al., 1999 ; Chen et al., 2000 ; Gandhi et al., 2000 ). Whether the latter results can be explained by expression of ER at low levels or an isoform of ER different from ERα is presently unknown.In the ER-positive MCF7 breast cancer cell line, antiapoptotic effects of E2 have been reported previously (Huang, 1997 ; Perillo et al., 2000 ; Ahamed et al., 2001 ); however, the mechanisms of action are poorly defined. It is now established that E2 induces transcription of the BCL2 gene and increases expression of BCL2 protein, which exerts antiapoptotic action in many cell types (Huang, 1997 ; Dong et al., 1999 ; Leung and Wang, 1999 ). In addition to genomic actions, E2 has been known to exert rapid, likely nongenomic actions both in the whole animal and in cultured cells (Szego, 1974 ; Huang, 1997 ; Razandi et al., 2000a,b). Previously, we had observed that estrogens require the function of the Ras, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)1 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway to induce G1/S phase transition (Ahamed et al., 2001 ) and elicit down-regulation of the Cdk2 inhibitor p27kip1 (Foster, 2003 ; Zhu et al., 2003 ). Given that E2 is now known to activate kinase-regulated signal transduction pathways in MCF7 and other cells (Migliaccio et al., 1996 , and references therein; Singh et al., 2000 ; Zhang and Shapiro, 2000 ), we have examined potential nongenomic pathways involved in its antiapoptotic actions, in particular the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K)/Akt/BAD pathway, which mediates BAD inactivation and favors cell survival. In this article, we demonstrate for the first time that E2 induces BAD phosphorylation through Ras/PI-3K/Akt as well as Ras/ERK/p90RSK1 pathways, and we also show that the function of the PI-3K/Akt pathway is required for E2 to block apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), H2O2, and serum withdrawal. Our data further provide evidence that BAD function is required for induction of apoptosis in MCF7 cells by TNF-α, H2O2, and serum withdrawal and that overexpression of the dual phosphorylation site mutant of BAD, but not the wild type, abolished the antiapoptotic actions of E2.MATERIALS AND METHODS Cell Culture, Serum Starvation, Treatment with E2 and Other Agents MCF7 cells (a gift from R.P. Shiu; Dubik and Shiu, 1992 ) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, penicillin G, and streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cells were kept in 1% serum for 24 h in DMEM (phenol red [PR]-free) medium and completely serum withdrawn for additional 24-48 h before the experiments. Before treatments, cells were washed once with warm phosphate-buffered saline and treated in medium free of serum and PR. LY294002 (5 μM in 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium [MTT] assay, 20 μM in other assays) (Sigma-Aldrich) and ICI182,780 (1 μM), PD98059 (50 μM) were added 1 h before E2 (1 nM in MTT assay and 10 nM in other assays) or IGF-1 (10 ng/ml). ICI182,780 is a gift from Zeneca Pharmaceuticals (Wilmington, DE). Where appropriate, cells were treated with dimethyl sulfoxide or ethanol as controls.Cell Survival Assay At 20-30% confluence, cells were treated in triplicates in 24-well plates. At 24-h intervals, MTT assay was performed according to the manufacturer's (Sigma-Aldrich) protocol. Briefly, MTT (5 mg/ml) was added to equal 1/10 the culture volume and incubated for 3 h. Medium was removed, and the converted dye was solubilized in ice-cold isopropanol. Absorbency of dye was measured at 560 nm with background subtraction at 630 nm on a microplate reader (EL 340 Bio Kinetics Reader; Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT) DNA Fragmentation Assay (Cell Death Detection ELISAPLUS) Apoptosis was induced with H2O2 (2 mM) for 1.5 h, TNF-α (10 ng/ml) for 8 h, or by complete removal of growth factors for 72 h. Cells were pretreated with E2 or IGF-1 for 1 h before apoptotic stimuli. DNA fragmentation was quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Cell Death ELISA; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) with slight modification to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 50,000 cells of each treatment were lysed in 100 μl of lysis buffer, and a fraction of the supernatant was subjected to reaction for 2 h with the immunocomplex of anti-DNA conjugated with peroxidase, which binds to nucleosomal DNA, and antihistone-biotin, which interacts with streptavidin-coated wells in a microtiter plate. At the end of the incubation, substrate was added, and color development was quantified at 405-nm wavelength. Adenoviral Infections PTEN (kindly donated by Dr. R Bookstein; Cheney et al., 1999 ), DNAkt (kindly donated by Dr. K Walsh; Kureishi et al., 2000 ), and LacZ (Q.Biogene, Carlsbad, CA) were transduced at 60, 30, and 30 multiplicity of infection (MOI), respectively. Optimum MOIs were determined by analyzing DNA profiles (by flow cytometry) in response to virus dosage. To study DNA fragmentation with TNF-α or H2O2, cells were maintained in DMEM (PR free) with 2.5% fetal bovine serum for 24 h after infection followed by induction of apoptosis. In 2A, cells were completely serum withdrawn for additional 48 h after infection.Western Blot Analysis Cells were washed once with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 1% NP-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 nM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM NaVO3, 1 mM NaF. For the detection of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage, cells were lysed in ice-cold buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 6.5 M urea, 5% mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, and protease inhibitors, sonicated for 20 s, and briefly centrifuged to remove cell debris (Xu et al., 2002 ).For cytochrome c detection, cytosolic fraction was prepared as described in Hirai and Wang (2001 ) with some modifications. Cells were suspended in hypotonic buffer containing 3.3 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1.7 mM KCl, 0.25 mM MgCl2, 0.17 mM EGTA, and 0.17 mM EDTA, 6.6 μg/ml leupeptin, 0.3 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 16.7 mM NaF, 66.7 μM Na3VO4, and 8.3 mM sodium β-glycerophosphate. After incubation on ice for 30 min, cells were homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5min at 4°C to discard unbroken cells and nuclei. The resulting supernatant was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C to obtain the heavy-membrane fraction (pellet) and the cytosol (supernatant).Aliquots of cell extracts containing 50-100 μg of total proteins or immunoprecipitates of desired proteins were resolved on SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with specific antibodies to phospho-ERKs [pTEpY] (Promega, Madison, WI), phospho-BAD [S112 and S136] (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), ERK2, PTEN, BAD, PARP, cytochrome c, Ras, and Akt (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) followed by secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Required concentrations of antibodies for Western blot analyses were determined using manufacturers' protocols. Proteins were detected by ECL (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). The band intensities/fold activities were measured by Sigma Gel software (Jandel Scientific, Winooski, VT). Immunocomplex Kinase Activity Assays Antibodies against ERK2, Akt, GSK3β, p85 (PI-3K), and protein A/G plus beads were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti p90RSK1antibody, soluble BAD, and IRS-1 were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology. Myelin basic protein (MBP) was from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). One hundred to 200 μg of total protein was immunoprecipitated with antibody in excess and protein A/G plus beads at 4°C overnight. Precipitates were washed three times with TG buffer (250 mM NaCl, 20 nM Tris, 0.5% NP-40) and once with kinase buffer (50 nM HEPES, pH 7.4, 15 mM MgCl2). Kinase reactions were performed by incubating immunoprecipitates and the specific substrates (0.2-1 μg/sample) in kinase mixture (20 μM ATP, 5 μCi of [γ-32P]ATP, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM Na3VO4 in kinase buffer) for 30 min at room temperature. Reactions were stopped with 4× Laemmli's sample buffer and were resolved on SDS-PAGE. Band intensities of phosphorylated substrates in autoradiograms were measured by densitometry. Phosphorylation Assay (Nonradioactive) with BAD Mutants p-GEX-BADwt/mutant (kindly donated by Drs. P Cohen; Lizcano et al., 2000 ) and AM Tolkovsky; Virdee et al., 2000 ) were grown in Escherichia coli, and proteins were isolated using glutathione-agarose beads (Sigma-Aldrich) followed by elution in the presence of reduced glutathione. Ten micrograms of BAD protein was incubated with 75 μg of whole cell lysate in 50 μl of kinase buffer in the presence of 25 μM ATP for 30 min. At the end of the reaction, 15 μl of agarose-conjugated glutathione was added and shaken for 1 h at 40°C. Beads were collected, washed three times with TG buffer, and resuspended in 25 μl of 2× Laemmli's sample buffer.Treatment with BAD Oligonucleotides BAD antisense oligonucleotides (with phosphorothioate linkages) were synthesized and purified by Sigma-Genosys (Woodlands, TX). Cells were transfected twice with LipofectAMINE Plus reagent according to the manufacturer's (Invitrogen) protocol 48 h apart. Transfections were carried out in six-well plates with 1 μg of oligonulceotide per well. Twenty-four hours after the second transfection, cells were treated and collected for desired analyses. Antisense oligonucleotides used in this study encoded complimentary sequences to the coding regions including translation initiation (BAD antisense 1) and termination codon (BAD antisense 2) sites for the human BAD gene. Oligonucleotide sequences used were BAD antisense 1, 5′-TGGGATCTGTAACATGCT-3′; BAD antisense 1 (scrambled/control), 5′-GGTTAGGTCAATTACTCG-3′; and BAD antisense 2, 5′-CGAAGGTCACTGGGA-3′. Cells were treated with H2O2 or TNF-α (with or without E2) or completely serum withdrawn for 72 h to induce apoptosis. DNA content was analyzed by flow cytometry and sub-G1 population was considered as apoptotic (Ormerod et al., 1992 ).Transient Transfection, Microscopic Analysis of Nuclear Morphology, and Confocal Microscopy MCF7 cells grown on coverslips were transiently transfected with FLAG-tagged BAD mutants and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP, 15% of total DNA) by using LipofectAMINE Plus reagent according to the manufacturer's (Invitrogen) protocol. The BAD constructs used in this study were human BAD wild-type (Wt) and human BAD serine75 and serine99 (equivalent to mouse serine112 and serine136, respectively) mutated to alanine (Dm) and were kindly donated by Dr. H.G. Wang (Hirai and Wang, 2001 ). Coverslips were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde and mounted on to glass slides. Nuclei were stained with 3 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich) and analyzed for the blue (DNA) and green (EGFP) fluorescence by using a fluorescence microscope (Leitz DMRB) or the confocal microscope. Cells expressing EGFP were considered as coexpressing BAD mutants. We have previously validated the coexpression of plasmid constructs in MCF7 cells (Foster, 2003 ). Morphological changes in the nuclei were analyzed and condensed/shrunk nuclei were counted as apoptotic as opposed to normal round nuclei (Candolfi et al., 2002 ).FLAG-wtBAD and RasN17, RasV12T35S (kindly donated by Drs. G.L. Johnson and C.M. Counter (Hamad et al., 2002 , respectively) or empty vector were cotransfected at 1:1 ratio for coexpression studies. For macroscopic analyses, cells grown on coverslips were transfected with Ras or empty vector constructs together with EGFP (15% of total DNA) and processed and analyzed as described above.Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test (Prism; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA), and p ≤ 0.05 is considered significant. RESULTS Inhibition of Apoptosis in MCF7 Cells by E2 Is Dependent on the PI-3K/Akt Pathway Previous work in our laboratory has shown that estrogens decreased cell death and apoptosis induced in MCF7 cells by mitogen withdrawal (Ahamed et al., 2001 ). Recent work indicates that induction of cell growth by E2 in MCF7 cells may require activity of the PI-3K pathway (Lobenhofer et al., 2000 ) and the Ras/ERK pathway (Castoria et al., 2001 ). Furthermore, we reported that G1/S phase transition and Cdk2 activation induced by estrogens is inhibited by dominant-negative (DN) Ras mutants (Ahamed et al., 2001 ; Foster, 2003 ; Zhu et al., 2003 ), and the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 abrogated the increase in cyclin D1 accumulation resulting from estrogen treatment (Ahamed et al., 2001 ).Given this background, we sought to determine whether PI-3K plays an important role in estrogen action with respect to cell growth and apoptosis. In preliminary experiments (our unpublished data), we verified that E2 promoted cell survival/growth under low serum conditions and further established that the PI-3K inhibitor wortmannin inhibited this effect of E2. To confirm the requirement of PI-3K activity for the cell survival induced by E2, MCF7 cells were treated with E2 in the presence or absence of LY294002, a specific PI-3K inhibitor (Sanchez-Margalet et al., 1994 ) in serum-free medium. In the absence of E2, there was significant cell loss reflected in MTT uptake over a 5-d period (p < 0.05). E2 completely blocked this decrease and maintained MTT uptake at or above day 1 level (Figure 1A
The above-mentioned results and prior observations suggest that E2 may decrease apoptosis in MCF7 cells. Because TNF-α induces apoptosis through activation of caspases 3, 6, 7, and 8 and/or JNK activation (Budihardjo et al., 1999 ) in a variety of cell types, including MCF7 cells (Burow et al., 1999 ; Guicciardi et al., 2000 ; Tang et al., 2001 ), we treated MCF7 cells with TNF-α in the presence of E2, 17-α estradiol (an estrogen of low potency), E2 plus an excess of the specific E2 antagonist ICI182,780. TNF-α increased apoptosis as measured by DNA fragmentation by four- to fivefold, and E2 was able to reduce this effect significantly, whereas 17α-estradiol had no protective effect. The presence of an excess of the E2 antagonist blocked the protective effect of E2 in TNF-α-treated cells (Figure 1B ), was induced by TNF-α, and this cleavage was significantly blocked by E2 pretreatment (Figure 1CThe reactive oxygen species H2O2 is known to induce apoptosis in a variety of cell types, including MCF7 cells (Kim et al., 2000 ), and the apoptotic effect of H2O2 in these cells is decreased by pretreatment with E2 or overexpression of BCL2 in a synergistic manner (Perillo et al., 2000 ). Furthermore, E2 and overexpression of BCL2 exhibit additive inhibitory effects on cleavage of PARP (Duriez and Shah, 1997 ) induced by H2O2. In confirmation of these data, we found that E2 pretreatment can block DNA fragmentation as well as PARP cleavage induced by 2 mM H2O2 (Figure 1, B and C ).Apoptotic effects of certain stimuli, including those activating the extrinsic pathway, are manifested at least in part via their effects on mitochondrial membrane integrity (Downward, 1999 ; Gross et al., 1999 ). Release of cytochrome c from dysfunctional mitochondria contributes to the formation of the apoptosome, which ultimately activates the downstream caspase pathways (Budihardjo et al., 1999 ). Because the results presented in Figure 1, A-CEstradiol Effects on H2O2-, TNF-α-, and Serum Withdrawal-induced Apoptosis Are Abolished by Dominant Negative Akt (DNAkt) and Wild-Type PTEN To establish the role of the PI-3K pathway in E2-induced antiapoptosis, we used adenoviral vectors to interfere with operation of this pathway. Cells were transduced with adenoviral wild-type PTEN/MMAC (Figure 2D ), and overexpression of PTEN has been used to decrease PI-3K products in other studies (Nakashima et al., 2000 ). As depicted in Figure 2 ; Datta et al., 1999 ). Overexpression of DNAkt (Figure 2D
Estradiol Induces BAD Phosphorylation BAD is a proapoptotic BH3 domain-containing protein (Gross et al., 1999 ; Adams and Cory, 2001 ), which forms heterodimers with BCL2 or BCLxl (Condorelli et al., 2001 ) resulting in cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Antiapoptotic agents such as IGF-1 induce BAD phosphorylation at specific serine residues, and phosphorylated BAD is sequestered away from its site of action in the mitochondria by binding to cytosolic 14-3-3 proteins (Datta et al., 1997 ). Because BAD is phosphorylated on serine 136 (S136) by Akt (Datta et al., 1997 ), we ascertained the ability of E2 to induce phosphorylation of BAD at specific residues by using BAD phosphorylation site mutants as in vitro substrates (Figure 3A ).
We also measured BAD phosphorylation in vivo by Western blot analysis. After treatment with E2 or IGF-1 for 15 min, both S112 and S136 phosphorylations were enhanced (>3-fold), and total BAD levels were unchanged in this time frame (Figure 3B Because our results demonstrated that E2 can induce BAD phosphorylation in vitro and in vivo and can prevent cell death in response to several stimuli, we studied the possible changes in phosphorylation status of BAD during apoptosis induction. E2 increased endogenous BAD phosphorylation at S112 and S136 above the basal level severalfold, whereas TNF-α and H2O2 decreased it below control level (Figure 3C ).Inhibition of BAD Is a Critical Event in Estradiol-induced Antiapoptosis in MCF7 Cells Because the effects of apoptotic agents on decreasing BAD phosphorylation (inactivation) were largely reversed by E2, BAD inactivation may be a potential nongenomic effect of E2, which results in cell survival. To further understand the involvement of BAD in cell death and survival in MCF7 cells, we used antisense oligonucleotides to prevent the translation of BAD mRNA. The antisense sequences, BAD antisense 1 (BAD As 1) containing the complementary sequence to the translation initiation codon and BAD antisense 2 (BAD As 2) containing complementary sequence to the translation termination codon were equally effective in down-regulating BAD protein level (Figure 4A ) in TNF-α-treated (Figure 4B ; Virdee et al., 2000 ). Change in apoptosis due to TNF-α was calculated by subtracting sub-G1 fraction of untreated from sub-G1 fraction of TNF-α-treated cells for each oligonucleotide-treated population. Data from three independent experiments are shown in Figure 4C
To assess the effects on BAD in E2-induced cell survival and consequent changes in cellular morphology, we transiently expressed wild-type BAD (wtBAD) and dual phosphorylation site mutant of BAD (dmBAD) where S112 and S136 are mutated to unphosphorylatable alanine, together with an EGFP expression vector. After the desired treatments, coverslip cultures were stained with Hoechst 33342 and mounted on to glass slides. As shown in Figure 4E Similarly transfected and treated cells were examined by the confocal microscopy to further analyze the cellular morphological changes (Supplementary Figure 1). TNF-α-induced cellular shrinkage and atypical structure of nuclei in MCF7 cells as has been described previously for fibroblast (Luschen et al., 2000 ) and neuronal cells (Candolfi et al., 2002 ). It was difficult to observe the chromatin clumping (typical for apoptosis) in TNF-α-treated cells due to shrinkage of the nuclei as opposed to this feature readily apparent in paclitaxel-treated cells (our unpublished data). Under these conditions, expression of exogenous wtBAD or most importantly, dmBAD (white arrows in florescence images and respective differential interference contrast images) did not enhance basal apoptosis (1 and 4). Treatment with TNF-α in wt and dmBAD-transfected cells clearly induced apoptotic changes (2 and 5). Whereas E2 was able to impede morphological effects of TNF-α in wtBAD-expressing cells (3), it was unable to counteract the effects of TNF-α in dmBAD-expressing cells (6 and 7). Black arrows in 6 and 7 point to the untransfected cells that preserve the normal morphology. Under these conditions, expression of EGFP alone did not induce morphological changes (white arrows in the insert). These observations further support the proposed crucial role of BAD in MCF7 cells and the critical importance of the two specific phosphorylation sites in BAD for the antiapoptotic effects of E2. It is very clear that dmBAD by itself does not induce apoptosis in the absence of TNF-α. This suggests that in these mammary carcinoma cells, there are mechanisms to possibly sequester BAD away from mitochondria independent of S112 and S136 phosphorylation and binding to 14-3-3 proteins, thus making dmBAD ineffective as an apoptosis inducer by itself. Antiapoptotic effect of E2 was further evaluated in cells expressing increasing levels of BAD. MCF7 cells were transfected with 1/4×, 1/2×, 1×, and 2× (× = regular dose = 0.6 μg of DNA for 10 cm2) of each construct and were treated with TNF-α with or without E2. DNA fragmentation was assayed as in Figure 4DEstradiol-induced BAD Phosphorylation Requires Ras-activated Signaling Pathways, and Ras Function Is Critical for Cell Survival of MCF7 Cells Previous studies in our laboratory had demonstrated that E2 induced p27kip1 degradation and entry of quiescent MCF7 cells to the cell cycle requires Ras activity (Ahamed et al., 2001 , 2002 ; Foster et al., 2001 ). Other investigators have demonstrated that E2 rapidly activated Ras in MCF7 cells (Keshamouni et al., 2002 ), and recent work in our laboratory (Foster, 2003 ) demonstrated that Ras activity is required for nuclear export and degradation of p27kip1 in response to E2. The phosphorylation of BAD at S112 and S136 has been proposed to be mediated by ERK/p90RSK1 and PI-3K/Akt pathways, respectively, in addition to other mechanisms (Downward, 1999 , and references therein). Given the role of Ras discussed above and the evidence that the PI-3K and ERK pathways are activated by E2 (as discussed below), we used chemical inhibitors LY294002 and PD98059 to inhibit these pathways, respectively, and determined the effects of these treatments on BAD phosphorylation. As shown in Figure 5A
Because Ras is a well-known upstream regulator of the PI-3K/Akt and MEK/ERK/p90RSK1 pathways, we analyzed the effects of inhibition of endogenous Ras by using dominant negative Ras RasN17 (DNRas) or selectively activating the MEK/ERK pathway with RasV12T35S (Hamad et al., 2002 ) in transient transfection experiments. FLAG-tagged BAD was cotransfected with control empty vector, RasN17, or RasV12T35S into MCF7 cells. Twenty-four hours after the transfection, cells were serum withdrawn for another 24 h and stimulated with E2 for 15 min. BAD phosphorylation was assessed by Western blotting. Clearly, the ability of E2 to increase both S112 and S136 phosphorylation (Figure 5B, 1To directly analyze the apoptotic effects of RasN17 in these cells, we stained nuclei of Ras-transfected cells and studied them by using the confocal microscope. Nuclei corresponding to EGFP-expressing cells (cotransfected with Ras or control vector) were counted, and the graph (Figure 5C Estradiol Activates the PI-3K/Akt Pathway, Leading to Phosphorylation of Downstream Targets Activation of PI-3K and Akt and Inactivation of GSK3β by E2 The above-mentioned data strongly argues that the ability of E2 to decrease apoptosis in MCF7 cells is at least partly mediated by the PI-3K/Akt pathway. Transient activation (measured by S473 phosphorylation) of Akt by E2 in MCF7 cells was reported previously (Castoria et al., 2001 ; Razandi et al., 2002 ) (see DISCUSSION) while this work was in progress (Fernando and Wimalasena, 2000 , 2002 ). Our data suggest that the PI-3K/Akt pathway may need to be activated for a prolonged period to maintain BAD in an inactivated (phosphorylated) state. Therefore, we measured detailed kinetic behavior of the PI-3K response to E2. PI-3K activation was determined by phosphorylation of IRS-1 on S612 by in vitro kinase assay using immunoprecipitates of the p85 subunit of PI-3K. As shown in Figure 6A ), catalytic activity of Akt is increased at least for 120 min. GSK3β is a downstream target of Akt (Cross et al., 1995 ) and because of its potential role in the cell cycle, we determined GSK3β activity by in vitro kinase assay using immunoprecipitates of GSK3β. As shown in Figure 6C ; Foster et al., 2001 ).
Activation of ERKs by Estradiol. It is known that p90RSK1 is phosphorylated at S364 and T574 residues by ERKs, leading to its activation (Dalby et al., 1998 ), and our results on BAD phosphorylation imply that E2 activates p90RSK1. Therefore, we directly determined that E2 rapidly activates p90RSK1 by in vitro kinase assay using immunoprecipitates of p90RSK1 (Figure 6, D and E , and references therein) and in a number of other cell types (Singh et al., 1999 ; Kousteni et al., 2001 ). However, others failed to observe E2-mediated ERK activation in MCF7 cells (Dupont et al., 2000 ; Lobenhofer et al., 2000 ; Caristi et al., 2001 ), and E2-induced ERK activity may not be a result of activation of the Ras/Raf signal transduction pathway but may follow rapid increase in intracellular Ca2+ (Improta-Brears et al., 1999 ). Furthermore, we had previously demonstrated that increased cyclin D1 synthesis in response to estrogens is partly blocked by the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 and that dominant negative ERK2 partially inhibited the induction of cell cycle transit by estrogens (Ahamed et al., 2001 ). Therefore, we measured a detailed time course of ERK activation by E2. We found that E2 rapidly activated ERK2 with maximum activation of fivefold observed within 15 min (Figure 7A ; Wennstrom and Downward, 1999 ), we explored this interaction further by overexpression of adenoviral PTEN. Whereas E2 or IGF-1 activated ERKs in control Ad virus-infected cells, PTEN overexpression (~3× over the basal level; Figure 7C, 3DISCUSSION Regulation of Apoptosis by E2 E2 is known to support cell survival or induce cell death/apoptosis depending on the cell context (Choi et al., 2001 ; Okasha et al., 2001 ). Most of E2's actions on cell survival or death, as for many other steroid hormone actions, have been attributed to gene regulation. Emerging evidence for nongenomic actions of E2 (reviewed in Kelly and Levin, 2001 ) prompted us to examine the signaling mechanisms of E2 with respect to regulation of cell survival in MCF7 breast cancer cells. We had previously shown that estrogens were able to decrease apoptosis induced by mitogen withdrawal in MCF7 cells (Ahamed et al., 2001 ). Our present study shows that E2 significantly reduces apoptosis induced by TNF-α, H2O2, and serum withdrawal by using signal transduction pathways that lead to phosphorylation and inactivation of proapoptotic protein BAD. In Figure 8 ).
Role of BAD in Apoptosis and Its Regulation by E2 E2 effects on BCL2 family members have been described previously: in cells where survival is promoted, E2 increased mRNA (Perillo et al., 2000 ) and protein levels of antiapoptotic BCL2 (Dong et al., 1999 ; Choi et al., 2001 ) or down-regulated proapoptotic Bak protein (Leung et al., 1998 ). In contrast to regulation of BCL2 and Bak at the transcriptional level, we find that E2 rapidly induces phosphorylation of BAD at two serine residues (112 and 136) without altering BAD protein levels (Figure 3B ), we sought to determine whether E2-induced phosphorylation of BAD is important for the antiapoptotic functions of E2.BAD complexes with BCL2 and BCLxl, and leads to loss of mitochondrial integrity (Hirai and Wang, 2001 ); therefore, release of cytochrome c into the cytoplasm is expected after BAD “activation.” The apoptotic stimuli increased the cytochrome c levels in the cytoplasm, and cotreatment with E2 reduced this effect concomitant with improved cell survival (Figure 1D ).To confirm the importance of BAD in MCF7 cells, we used antisense oligonucleotides to suppress BAD protein translation (Figure 4A ; Virdee et al., 2000 ). The fact that antisense BAD blocked ability of TNF-α to induce apoptosis (Figure 4, C and DAgents such as TNF-α and H2O2 have been shown to have mixed effects on BAD protein levels and phosphorylation. TNF-α increased phosphorylation of BAD through PI-3K pathway in neutrophils (Cowburn et al., 2002 ), and in HeLa cells (Pastorino et al., 1999 ) where cell survival rather than the cell death was promoted. TNF-α also induced the production of more potent truncated form of BAD in a caspase 3-dependent manner, leading to apoptosis in Jurkat cells (Condorelli et al., 2001 ). Similarly, H2O2 but not superoxide anion (O2-) has been shown to increase BAD protein levels in cardiomyocytes, leading to apoptosis (von Harsdorf et al., 1999 ). Serum starvation may modulate activity of BAD and other apoptosis regulators, and such effects may be reversed by addition of growth factors or by manipulating signal transduction pathways (Yano et al., 1998 ; Bai et al., 1999 ). Recent evidence from BAD knockout mice suggests that BAD may have an important proapoptotic role in certain cell types such as the mammary tissue. Importance of BAD was especially underscored in apoptosis that occurs in the absence of growth factors (Ranger et al., 2003 ) much like the importance of BAD inactivation in the response to E2, which is a well-known growth factor to breast cancer cells. However, it is also evident that BAD concentration or phosphorylation status could not be used to define survival or apoptosis in other cells such as PC12 cells (Maroto and Perez-Polo, 1997 ).Estradiol Signals through Two Pathways in Its Antiapoptotic Action Roles of Ras/PI-3K/Akt and Ras/ERK/p90RSK Pathways in BAD Phosphorylation. The ability of DNAkt or PTEN to reverse the protective effects of E2 (Figure 2 ). Deranged PI-3K/Akt signaling due to PTEN deficiency or germline mutation has been proposed as a frequent cause for breast cancer (Mills et al., 2001 ; Petrocelli and Slingerland, 2001 ). Given the importance of PI-3K/Akt pathway to antiapoptotic action of E2, we examined aspects of this pathway, which might influence cell survival. Our results clearly indicate that PI-3K/Akt has a critical role in E2 action as a survival agent (Figure (Figure1A,1A , 2002 ), Castoria et al. (2001 ), and Stoica et al. (2003a ) demonstrated that E2 rapidly activates PI-3K/Akt in MCF7 cells, but others were unable to observe such activities of E2 (Ahmad et al., 1999 ; Dupont et al., 2000 ). However, in contrast to Castoria et al. (2001 ), we found a rapid and sustained activation of Akt in response to E2 (Figure 6B ; Stoica et al., 2003a ) are not clear but could relate to subtle culture conditions, treatment periods, or cell line variability. Prolonged activity of Akt is required to maintain BAD phosphorylation at S136 (Figure 3B ) and increased cyclin D1 protein is a characteristic response to E2 in MCF7 and other estrogen-responsive cells (Foster et al., 2001 , and references therein). E2 signaling also has been shown to be closely associated with the PI-3K/Akt pathway in vascular endothelial cells (Hisamoto et al., 2001 ), and ERα is phosphorylated by activation of the PI-3K/Akt pathway in MCF7 cells in the absence of E2 (Campbell et al., 2001 ; Stoica et al., 2003b ).In addition to Akt-mediated signaling, our data demonstrate that E2 also may signal through Ras/ERK/p90RSK pathway because endogenous and exogenous BAD were effectively phosphorylated at S112, a well-known ERK/p90RSK phosphorylation site (Downward, 1999 ) in E2-treated cells (Figure 3, A and B ; Bhatt and Ferrell, 1999 ). Although the ability of E2 to activate ERK remains controversial (Lobenhofer et al., 2000 ; Caristi et al., 2001 ; Song et al., 2002 ) due to unknown reasons, ERK activation seems to be important in the apoptotic response (Fang et al., 1999 ; Shimamura et al., 2000 ), perhaps through the regulation of BAD phosphorylation via p90RSK. The prolonged activation of ERK (Figure 7A ) may be important to maintain the phosphorylation and inactivation of BAD, acting in concert with Akt. Prolonged ERK activation is also required for G1/S transition via enhanced cyclin D1 synthesis (Murphy et al., 2002 ) and p27kip1 degradation (Foster, 2003 ). Together, the data in Figure 5 ; Lizcano et al., 2000 ; Donovan et al., 2002 ; Konishi et al., 2002 ).Interaction and Regulation of the Estradiol-induced Signal Pathways. The two signaling pathways that we describe here may function as separate entities or interact to mediate E2 effects. Previous studies have shown that Ras/ERK and PI-3K/Akt exhibit regulatory cross talk (Wennstrom and Downward, 1999 ; Shields et al., 2000 ; York et al., 2000 ). Regulation of ERK by E2 through the PI-3K/Akt pathway has not been previously reported to our knowledge. Using both biological and chemical inhibitors, we found that PI-3K may be required not only for E2 but also for IGF-1-induced ERK activation (Figure 7, B and C ). Overexpression of dominant negative Ras (RasN17) interfered with E2-induced BAD phosphorylation on both serine residues (Figure 5B ). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that E2 may regulate another kinase, which can phosphorylate BAD on S136. We previously demonstrated a role for Ras in estrogen-induced cell cycle progression (Ahamed et al., 2001 ; Zhu et al., 2003 ) and recently showed that the Ras/Raf/ERK pathway has a critical role in E2 induced p27kip1 degradation and relocalization in MCF7 cells (Foster, 2003 ). Others (Migliaccio et al., 1996 ; Filardo et al., 2002 ) have reported rapid activation of Ras by E2. The ability of RasN17 to induce apoptosis in proliferating cells (Figure 5C ). Because 3′4′5′ or 3′4′PI phosphates regulate a variety of signal pathways such as Akt and PDK that could lead to modulation of Ras/Raf/ERK pathway (Rameh and Cantley, 1999 ), nongenomic signaling by E2 may be very complex (Levin, 2003 ). Furthermore, activation of PI-3K by E2 through a direct interaction of the p85 subunit with ERα was reported in human vascular endothelial cells (Simoncini et al., 2000 ) and MCF7 cells (Sun et al., 2001 ). Clearly, further studies are needed to delineate signaling mechanisms and their interactions in the perspective of estradiol's antiapoptotic and cell cycle effects.Interestingly, many of the responses to E2 observed in this study also were elicited by IGF-1, as has been demonstrated in the context of MCF7 cell proliferation (Stewart et al., 1990 ; Dupont et al., 2000 ). E2 may indirectly activate Akt genomic actions (increased IGF-1 receptor expression, IGF-1 synthesis/secretion) (Ahmad et al., 1999 ; Lee et al., 1999 ); however, the responses we have described here are elicited by E2 within a 2- to 15-min time frame, which is not tenable with genomic actions of E2. On the other hand, we cannot formally exclude the possibility that E2 may activate immediate release of IGF-1 (or other growth factors) from an inactive storage form(s), as recently documented (Filardo et al., 2000 ) for epidermal growth factor. The nongenomic signaling of E2 is postulated to be mediated by membrane-associated ER (Kelly and Levin, 2001 ), and this hypothesis is further supported by the recent demonstrations of membrane located ERα in MCF7 and other cell types (Marquez and Pietras, 2001 ; Powell et al., 2001 ). According to these studies, the fraction of plasma membrane-bound ERα ranged from 3 to 20% of the total in MCF7 cells. Agreeing with this notion, our data show that E2 induced rapid ERK phosphorylation, and the protective effects against apoptotic agents was substantially blocked by the antiestrogen ICI182,780 (Figures (Figures1B1BSUMMARY This study demonstrates that E2 as well as IGF-1 inhibit apoptosis in MCF7 cells by enhanced phosphorylation of BAD and indicates that BAD inactivation results from activation of Ras/ERK/p90RSK and Ras/PI-3K/Akt pathways by E2. Our results also indicate that BAD plays an essential role in apoptosis induced by H2O2, TNF-α, and serum withdrawal and also demonstrate that even the double phosphorylation site mutant of BAD (S112/136A) is inactive as an inducer of apoptosis in the absence of TNF-α. Our results suggest that the ability of E2 to prevent apoptosis in MCF7 cells requires BAD inactivation, which occurs in response to Ras activation by E2. Thus, we have demonstrated a novel nongenomic pathway by which E2 promotes survival of breast cancer cells in culture. Furthermore, this is the first report to our knowledge demonstrating the role of the Ras/PI-3K/Akt/BAD and Ras/Raf/ERK/p90RSK/BAD pathways as potential nongenomic mediators of the antiapoptotic actions of E2 or any other steroid hormone. The crucial contributions of aberrant Ras as well as those of Akt function to human cancer development is widely accepted (Datta et al., 1999 ; Shields et al., 2000 ), and inactive mutations or down-regulation of tumor suppressor PTEN have been linked to accelerated tumor growth in breast and other cancers (Maehama and Dixon, 1999 ). Therefore, our study provides a mechanism whereby the functions of these oncogenes and tumor suppressors may converge and dictate the fate of the breast cancer cell.Supplemental Figures
Acknowledgments We thank Drs. Don Torry, Roger Carroll, H.R. Wang, and Ming Zou for critical review of the manuscript; Steve Foster and Don Henley for advice and support throughout the study; Andy Shannon for preparing plasmids; Dr. Jonathan Wall and Craig Wooliver for the assistance in fluorescence microscopy; Dr. John Dunlap for the assistance in confocal microscopy; Richard Andrews for flow cytometric analysis; and Eva Bukovska and Will Laxtyon for editorial support. This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grant 84048 to J.W. R.I.F. gratefully acknowledges the graduate student stipend from the University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine in Knoxville. Notes Article published online ahead of print. Mol. Biol. Cell 10.1091/mbc.E03-11-0823. Article and publication date are available at www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E03-11-0823. Abbreviations used: Dm, double mutant; DN, dominant negative; Wt, wild type. Online version of this article contains supporting material. Online version is available at www.molbiolcell.org.References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Steroids. 2000 Oct-Nov; 65(10-11):593-8.
[Steroids. 2000]J Neurosci. 2001 Oct 15; 21(20):RC176.
[J Neurosci. 2001]Br J Cancer. 1999 Oct; 81(3):387-92.
[Br J Cancer. 1999]Endocrinology. 2001 Jun; 142(6):2351-60.
[Endocrinology. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 14; 97(6):2703-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997 Jan; 42(1):73-81.
[Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997]Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Apr; 20(8):2890-901.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2000]Mol Carcinog. 2001 Feb; 30(2):88-98.
[Mol Carcinog. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1999 Nov 5; 274(45):32099-107.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Br J Cancer. 1999 Oct; 81(3):387-92.
[Br J Cancer. 1999]Oncogene. 1992 Aug; 7(8):1587-94.
[Oncogene. 1992]Cancer Res. 1999 May 15; 59(10):2318-23.
[Cancer Res. 1999]Nat Med. 2000 Sep; 6(9):1004-10.
[Nat Med. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2002 Dec 13; 277(50):48913-22.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Biochem J. 2001 Oct 15; 359(Pt 2):345-52.
[Biochem J. 2001]Biochem J. 2000 Jul 15; 349(Pt 2):547-57.
[Biochem J. 2000]Curr Biol. 2000 Sep 21; 10(18):1151-4.
[Curr Biol. 2000]J Immunol Methods. 1992 Aug 30; 153(1-2):57-65.
[J Immunol Methods. 1992]Biochem J. 2001 Oct 15; 359(Pt 2):345-52.
[Biochem J. 2001]Endocrinology. 2002 Sep; 143(9):3611-7.
[Endocrinology. 2002]Genes Dev. 2002 Aug 15; 16(16):2045-57.
[Genes Dev. 2002]Mol Carcinog. 2001 Feb; 30(2):88-98.
[Mol Carcinog. 2001]Cell Growth Differ. 2000 Feb; 11(2):99-110.
[Cell Growth Differ. 2000]EMBO J. 2001 Nov 1; 20(21):6050-9.
[EMBO J. 2001]FASEB J. 2003 Feb; 17(2):186-93.
[FASEB J. 2003]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994 Oct 28; 204(2):446-52.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999; 15():269-90.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999]Carcinogenesis. 1999 Nov; 20(11):2057-61.
[Carcinogenesis. 1999]J Clin Invest. 2000 Nov; 106(9):1127-37.
[J Clin Invest. 2000]Mol Cell. 2001 Nov; 8(5):1005-16.
[Mol Cell. 2001]Exp Cell Res. 2000 May 25; 257(1):82-8.
[Exp Cell Res. 2000]Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Apr; 20(8):2890-901.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2000]Mol Pharmacol. 1997 Apr; 51(4):535-41.
[Mol Pharmacol. 1997]Nat Cell Biol. 1999 Jun; 1(2):E33-5.
[Nat Cell Biol. 1999]Genes Dev. 1999 Aug 1; 13(15):1899-911.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999; 15():269-90.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999]Trends Cell Biol. 1999 Apr; 9(4):125-8.
[Trends Cell Biol. 1999]J Biol Chem. 2000 Apr 28; 275(17):12889-95.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998 Apr; 10(2):262-7.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998]Genes Dev. 1999 Nov 15; 13(22):2905-27.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Genes Dev. 1999 Aug 1; 13(15):1899-911.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Trends Biochem Sci. 2001 Jan; 26(1):61-6.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 2001]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 May; 21(9):3025-36.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Cell. 1997 Oct 17; 91(2):231-41.
[Cell. 1997]Nat Cell Biol. 1999 Jun; 1(2):E33-5.
[Nat Cell Biol. 1999]J Immunol Methods. 1992 Aug 30; 153(1-2):57-65.
[J Immunol Methods. 1992]J Biol Chem. 1997 Dec 5; 272(49):30866-72.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Curr Biol. 2000 Sep 21; 10(18):1151-4.
[Curr Biol. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2000 Aug 11; 275(32):24670-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Endocrinology. 2002 Sep; 143(9):3611-7.
[Endocrinology. 2002]Mol Carcinog. 2001 Feb; 30(2):88-98.
[Mol Carcinog. 2001]Mol Carcinog. 2002 May; 34(1):45-58.
[Mol Carcinog. 2002]Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Sep; 12(7):320-7.
[Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2002 Jun 21; 277(25):22558-65.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Nat Cell Biol. 1999 Jun; 1(2):E33-5.
[Nat Cell Biol. 1999]Genes Dev. 2002 Aug 15; 16(16):2045-57.
[Genes Dev. 2002]EMBO J. 2001 Nov 1; 20(21):6050-9.
[EMBO J. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jan 24; 278(4):2701-12.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Nature. 1995 Dec 21-28; 378(6559):785-9.
[Nature. 1995]Mol Endocrinol. 1996 May; 10(5):488-98.
[Mol Endocrinol. 1996]Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Sep; 12(7):320-7.
[Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1998 Jan 16; 273(3):1496-505.
[J Biol Chem. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 13; 96(8):4686-91.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]J Neurosci. 1999 Feb 15; 19(4):1179-88.
[J Neurosci. 1999]Cell. 2001 Mar 9; 104(5):719-30.
[Cell. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2000 Nov 17; 275(46):35893-901.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Endocrinology. 2001 Jun; 142(6):2351-60.
[Endocrinology. 2001]Toxicology. 2001 May 28; 163(1):49-62.
[Toxicology. 2001]Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2001 May-Jun; 12(4):152-6.
[Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2001]Mol Carcinog. 2001 Feb; 30(2):88-98.
[Mol Carcinog. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jan 24; 278(4):2701-12.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Apr; 20(8):2890-901.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1999 Nov 5; 274(45):32099-107.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Endocrinology. 2001 Jun; 142(6):2351-60.
[Endocrinology. 2001]Cancer Lett. 1998 Feb 13; 124(1):47-52.
[Cancer Lett. 1998]Nat Cell Biol. 1999 Jun; 1(2):E33-5.
[Nat Cell Biol. 1999]Biochem J. 2001 Oct 15; 359(Pt 2):345-52.
[Biochem J. 2001]Nature. 2003 Aug 21; 424(6951):952-6.
[Nature. 2003]J Biol Chem. 1997 Dec 5; 272(49):30866-72.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Curr Biol. 2000 Sep 21; 10(18):1151-4.
[Curr Biol. 2000]Blood. 2002 Oct 1; 100(7):2607-16.
[Blood. 2002]J Biol Chem. 1999 Jul 2; 274(27):19411-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 May; 21(9):3025-36.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Circulation. 1999 Jun 8; 99(22):2934-41.
[Circulation. 1999]Nature. 1998 Dec 10; 396(6711):584-7.
[Nature. 1998]Cancer Res. 2001 Aug 15; 61(16):5985-91.
[Cancer Res. 2001]Semin Oncol. 2001 Oct; 28(5 Suppl 16):125-41.
[Semin Oncol. 2001]Breast Cancer Res. 2001; 3(6):356-60.
[Breast Cancer Res. 2001]EMBO J. 2001 Nov 1; 20(21):6050-9.
[EMBO J. 2001]Mol Endocrinol. 2003 May; 17(5):818-30.
[Mol Endocrinol. 2003]Nat Cell Biol. 1999 Jun; 1(2):E33-5.
[Nat Cell Biol. 1999]J Biol Chem. 1996 Nov 22; 271(47):29773-9.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]Science. 1999 Nov 12; 286(5443):1362-5.
[Science. 1999]Cell Growth Differ. 2000 Feb; 11(2):99-110.
[Cell Growth Differ. 2000]Cancer Res. 2001 Sep 1; 61(17):6360-6.
[Cancer Res. 2001]Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Jun; 19(6):4279-88.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1999]Trends Cell Biol. 2000 Apr; 10(4):147-54.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2000]Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Nov; 20(21):8069-83.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2000]Nature. 1994 Aug 18; 370(6490):527-32.
[Nature. 1994]EMBO J. 1997 May 15; 16(10):2783-93.
[EMBO J. 1997]J Biol Chem. 1990 Dec 5; 265(34):21172-8.
[J Biol Chem. 1990]J Biol Chem. 2000 Nov 17; 275(46):35893-901.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Biochem Pharmacol. 1999 Aug 1; 58(3):425-30.
[Biochem Pharmacol. 1999]Mol Endocrinol. 1999 May; 13(5):787-96.
[Mol Endocrinol. 1999]Mol Endocrinol. 2000 Oct; 14(10):1649-60.
[Mol Endocrinol. 2000]Genes Dev. 1999 Nov 15; 13(22):2905-27.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Trends Cell Biol. 2000 Apr; 10(4):147-54.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2000]Trends Cell Biol. 1999 Apr; 9(4):125-8.
[Trends Cell Biol. 1999]Endocrinology. 2002 Sep; 143(9):3611-7.
[Endocrinology. 2002]