![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved. Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Type 2H Associated with Mutation in TRIM32, a Putative E3-Ubiquitin–Ligase Gene 1Departments of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics and 2Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg; and 3Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal Address for correspondence and reprints: Dr. Klaus Wrogemann, Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, 770 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0W3 Canada. E-mail: K_Wrogemann/at/Umanitoba.ca Received October 26, 2001; Accepted December 6, 2001. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2H (LGMD2H) is a mild autosomal recessive myopathy that was first described in the Manitoba Hutterite population. Previous studies in our laboratory mapped the causative gene for this disease to a 6.5-Mb region in chromosomal region 9q31-33, flanked by D9S302 and D9S1850. We have now used additional families and a panel of 26 microsatellite markers to construct haplotypes. Twelve recombination events that reduced the size of the candidate region to 560 kb were identified or inferred. This region is flanked by D9S1126 and D9S737 and contains at least four genes. Exons of these genes were sequenced in one affected individual, and four sequence variations were identified. The families included in our study and 100 control individuals were tested for these variations. On the basis of our results, the mutation in the tripartite-motif–containing gene (TRIM32) that replaces aspartate with asparagine at position 487 appears to be the causative mutation of LGMD2H. All affected individuals were found to be homozygous for D487N, and this mutation was not found in any of the controls. This mutation occurs in an NHL (named after the proteins NCL1, HT2A, and LIN-41) domain at a position that is highly conserved. NHL domains are known to be involved in protein-protein interactions. Although the function of TRIM32 is unknown, current knowledge of the domain structure of this protein suggests that it may be an E3-ubiquitin ligase. If proven, this represents a new pathogenic mechanism leading to muscular dystrophy. Introduction The limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs) are a heterogeneous group of primary myopathies with both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive modes of inheritance (Bushby 1999a; Kaplan 2001). Recessively inherited forms LGMD2A–LGMD2I map to nine loci. The two most common types are LGMD2A and LGMD2B, which are caused by mutations in the genes encoding calpain 3 and dysferlin, respectively. LGMD2C–LGMD2F are caused by mutations in members of the sarcoglycan complex, and LGMD2G is caused by mutations in the gene for the sarcomeric protein telethonin. The genes responsible for LGMD2H and LGMD2I have not yet been identified. LGMD2H (MIM 254110) is a mild form of autosomal recessive muscular dystrophy, with a variable clinical presentation (Shokeir and Kobrinsky 1976; Weiler et al. 1997; Bushby 1999b). Onset is usually within the 2d or 3d decade of life, and progression is slow. Most patients have remained ambulatory into the 6th decade of life. There is no evidence of cardiac or facial involvement. To date, this disease has been described only in the Hutterite population of North America (Shokeir and Kobrinsky 1976; Shokeir and Rozdilsky 1985; Weiler et al. 1997). Our group recently mapped the locus for LGMD2H to an interval, flanked by D9S302 and D9S1850, in chromosomal region 9q31-33 (Weiler et al. 1998), which is now estimated to be 6.5 Mb (University of California–Santa Cruz [UCSC] Human Genome Project Working Draft). Herein, we describe the fine mapping and characterization of the LGMD2H candidate region. This was achieved by haplotype analysis and comparison of sequences from an affected individual and sequences generated by either the Human Genome Project (Lander et al. 2001) or Celera Genomics (Celera Publication Site; Venter et al. 2001). We sequenced genes in the candidate region for pathogenic mutations and identified TRIM32 as the most likely gene for LGMD2H. TRIM32 is a member of the tripartite-motif (TRIM) family of proteins described elsewhere (Reymond et al. 2001). Current views of the domains that are characteristic of this protein family suggest that TRIM32 may be involved in the ubiquitin (Ub)–proteasome pathway (Joazeiro and Weissman 2000). This pathway has not previously been implicated in muscular dystrophy and therefore represents a novel pathogenic mechanism. Subjects and Methods Subjects We studied 35 clinically affected Hutterite patients and members of their immediate families. Signed informed consent was obtained from each individual, and the study was approved by the University of Manitoba research-ethics board. Genotypes were obtained for 117 individuals, who constitute six interrelated families (two to four generations) with 2–12 family members affected with LGMD2H. Samples of DNA from 100 individuals not known to have LGMD or to be related to the Hutterites were used as controls; no demographic or ethnic information for these individuals was available to us. Eight Centre d'Étude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH) families with recombinations in chromosomal region 9q3 (S. Povey, personal communication) were used to help define marker order; CEPH individuals 1331-01, 1331-02, 1347-01, and 1347-02 were used to determine the size of microsatellite alleles (Fondation Jean Dausset–CEPH). DNA Analysis Genotypes were obtained as described elsewhere (Weiler et al. 1998). Haplotypes were constructed manually, by minimizing the number of recombinants and assuming no mutation of marker alleles. The candidate region was defined on the basis of observed or inferred ancestral recombination events. Oligonucleotide primers (table S1) were designed to amplify exons of the candidate genes from genomic DNA, for single-stranded conformational analysis (SSCA) and/or sequencing. For most exons of >350 bp, overlapping primers were designed. SSCA was performed on PCR products from three individuals: one patient and two siblings (one of whom has one disease-associated chromosome and the other of whom has no disease-associated chromosomes). The analysis was performed under three conditions: (a) 6% acrylamide (19:1) with 10% glycerol at 20°C, with 8 mA, for 20 h; (b) 6% acrylamide (19:1) with 20% glycerol at 4°C, with 10 W, for 20 h; and (c) MDE gel per manufacturer’s instructions (FMC BioProducts). PCR products to be sequenced were separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels. DNA fragments were purified from gel slices by GenElute (Sigma-Aldrich). The fragments were then sequenced, with the same primers used to generate the PCR products, on an ABI 377 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) at the Centre for Applied Genomics, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto. Putative mutations were identified by comparing the sequence obtained from the patient and the published sequences (GenBank; Celera Publication Site). DNA from an unaffected sibling was then sequenced to confirm the existence of two different alleles.
PCR assays based on either length variation or restriction-enzyme digestion were developed to screen the variations that were identified by DNA sequencing. The six Hutterite families included in this study and 100 control individuals were tested for the presence of each variation. All fragments were subjected to electrophoresis in an 8% acrylamide gel and were visualized by ethidium bromide staining unless otherwise specified. We named the mutations according to the recommendations of the Nomenclature Working Group (Antonarakis and Nomenclature Working Group 1998). The four variations were studied as follows (for description of each sequence variation, see table 1):
Expression Analysis A 12-tissue northern blot obtained from Origene Technologies was used to determine the normal distribution of the TRIM32 transcript. A TRIM32 probe was prepared by amplifying a 733-bp fragment of the gene by use of the primers HT2A_ex.2(5)F (5′-GGTGTGACTGACAGCTATG-3′) and HT2A_ex.2(6)R (5′-CATAGGCTGAGTCTATTCTGC-3′) from the genomic DNA of an unaffected individual. The fragment was subjected to electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel, was purified as described in the “DNA Analysis” subsection, and was then labeled using the Random Primers Labeling kit (Invitrogen). A product with a specific activity of 3×109 cpm/μg was obtained. The blot was hybridized using Ultrahyb hybridization solution (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The hybridized membrane was visualized by autoradiography with Biomax MS film (Kodak). Film exposure was performed at −80°C, with intensifying screens, for 100 h. Reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was performed on RNA that was isolated from cultured skin fibroblasts obtained from both an affected individual and an unaffected individual. RNA was isolated using an Oligotex Direct mRNA Isolation kit (Qiagen), and first-strand synthesis was performed using the Expand RT system (Roche) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Primers used for amplification of the PAPPA gene were PAPPA16/17 (5′-AACGGGCCTTCAAGACTCAG-3′) and PAPPA19/20 (5′-ACAACTCTCTCTACCCGTG-3′). Results Haplotype Analysis Haplotype analysis was performed both to define the order of markers used and to fine map the candidate region. Genotypes were obtained for the population that we studied and for selected CEPH individuals, and then haplotypes were constructed (complete data not shown). Three recombination events were identified in individuals C-06, C-07, and E-11, thereby reducing the candidate region from 6.5 Mb to an interval of 713 kb flanked by D9S241 and D9S931 (fig. 1
Physical Mapping Our early physical-mapping efforts used a combination of Human Genome Project sequences and radiation-hybrid mapping. Subsequent efforts focused on contiguous sequence obtained from the Celera Publication Site (GA_x54KRCDB2PK: 3500001–4500000) (see fig. 2
Mutation Screening All four aforementioned genes were considered as potential candidates for LGMD2H, on the basis of their chromosomal position. Both SSCA and DNA sequencing were used to search for disease-causing mutations. SSCA of exons located between the flanking microsatellite markers D9S1126 and D9S737 revealed only one silent substitution (i.e., V3) in PAPPA. DNA sequencing of the exons of the candidate gene shown in fig. 2 V3 results in a silent substitution in codon 1458 of PAPPA. The V3(T) allele was found to have a frequency of 2% in controls. Since the V3 mutation does not change the amino acid sequence of PAPPA, it could be disease causing if it leads to alternate splicing or if the codon usage of the V3(T) allele is significantly different. However, codon usage does not appear to be a factor, since the two coding triplets are used at similar frequencies in humans; UGC accounts for 55% of all cysteine codons, and UGU accounts for 45% of all cysteine codons (Codon Usage Database). Alternative splicing is unlikely because in silico analysis of the splice consensus sequences shows no predicted change with the introduction of V3(T) (NIX package; U.K. Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre). RT-PCR was used to confirm this prediction by amplifying the region containing V3 (PAPPA exons 17–19), from both affected and unaffected RNA isolated from cultured skin fibroblasts. No differences between the affected and unaffected samples were apparent (data not shown). V4 results in a nonconservative substitution of an acidic aspartate by a neutral asparagine at amino acid 487 of TRIM32. The V4(Asn) and V3(T) alleles are in complete linkage disequilibrium in the Hutterite families. The V4(Asn) allele was not observed in any of the controls. All 35 affected individuals in whom LGMD2H had been diagnosed are homozygous for V4(Asn) and V3(T). There were six asymptomatic individuals who were also homozygous for these alleles and the disease-associated chromosome. Four of these individuals are <20 years of age, which is consistent with our previous findings that the onset of LGMD2H is age dependent (Weiler et al. 1998). The other two individuals are in their 30s and do not meet the strict criteria for affected individuals that have been established by Weiler et al. (1997). The V4 amino acid substitution occurs within the third NHL (named after the proteins NCL1, HT2A [TRIM32], and LIN-41 [Slack and Ruvkun 1998]) domain of TRIM32. NHL domains are conserved motifs found in many prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins. This missense mutation occurs at one of the two most highly conserved positions in this domain (table 2) (Slack and Ruvkun 1998).
Northern Blot Analysis LGMD2H is a disease that is mainly restricted to skeletal muscle. Evidence from ESTs (UniGene accession number Hs.236218) suggests that the TRIM32 transcript is expressed in a wide variety of tissues, including skeletal muscle. To confirm the presence of the transcript in skeletal muscle, we probed a multiple-tissue northern blot (Origene Technologies) with a 733-bp fragment obtained from the coding sequence of TRIM32. The results (shown in fig. 3
Discussion On the basis of observed recombinants, the candidate gene for LGMD2H was previously defined to be in a 3.9–6.2-cM interval flanked by D9S302 and D9S1850 (Weiler et al. 1998). The region could be reduced to a 0.3-cM interval flanked by D9S302 and D9S934 by assuming that an ancestral recombination had occurred (Weiler et al. 1998). This interval is now estimated to be 4.1 Mb (UCSC Human Genome Project Working Draft). Through the study of additional families with LGMD2H and the use of 22 additional microsatellite markers, we have reduced the candidate region to a 560-kb interval flanked by D9S1126 and D9S737, on the basis of haplotype analysis. The region contains three annotated genes—PAPPA, ASTN2, and TRIM32—and one unannotated gene. TRIM32 is located within intron 12 of ASTN2, in the opposite orientation, and part of the unannotated gene is within introns 9 and 10 of PAPPA, in the opposite orientation (fig. 2 All exons within the candidate region were screened for mutations. Of the four sequence variations detected, V1 and V2 could readily be excluded as disease causing because they do not consistently segregate with disease. V3(T) appears to be an unlikely candidate because it leads neither to an amino acid change, to a codon with significantly altered usage, nor, apparently, to alternative splicing. The latter was confirmed by RT-PCR of mRNA isolated from skin fibroblasts that were obtained from one patient and from a control. However, at this time, we cannot exclude the possibility that the V3(T) allele either disrupts an exonic splicing enhancer that functions only in muscle (Liu et al. 1998, 2001) or alters the secondary structure of the mRNA (Shen et al. 1999). The best candidate mutation for LGMD2H is the missense mutation V4, in TRIM32, which changes codon 487 of TRIM32 from aspartate to asparagine (D487N). There is strong evidence that this D487N mutation causes LGMD2H, because (1) all affected individuals in our study are homozygous for V4(Asn); (2) the D487N mutation was not observed in 100 controls; (3) the D487N mutation occurs in a protein domain that is considered to be an NHL domain (Slack and Ruvkun 1998) and is found in many proteins, and the aspartate in question is one of the two most conserved amino acids in NHL domains (table 2); and (4) the mutation from aspartate to asparagine is a nonconservative change that could result in a significant alteration in the structure and function of TRIM32. Thus, we consider D487N to be the disease-causing mutation for LGMD2H in the patients whom we studied. The information that we currently possess does not exclude the possibility that V3 may contribute additional effects to the phenotype. TRIM32 has, from N- to C-terminal ends, a RING-finger domain, a B1 box, a coiled-coil domain, and six NHL domains (InterPro accession numbers IPR001841, IPR002991, IPR003649, and IPR001258, respectively) (Apweiler et al. 2001). TRIM32 is a member of a growing family of TRIM, or RING–B-box–coiled-coil, proteins (Reymond et al. 2001; Torok and Etkin 2001). Current knowledge of the RING-finger domain indicates that it may have intrinsic Ub-ligase activity (Barinaga 1999), and it has been suggested that all RING-finger proteins are E3-Ub ligases (Freemont 2000). This information suggests that TRIM32 is an E3-Ub ligase that functions in the Ub-proteasome pathway. The Ub-proteasome pathway is a specialized mechanism for the posttranslational regulation of protein levels. The initial step in the Ub-proteasome pathway is the activation of Ub by an E1-Ub–activating enzyme. The activated Ub is transferred to the E2-Ub–conjugating enzyme. The E3 ligase interacts with E2-Ub complex and recruits a protein to be targeted to the 26S proteasome. The E3 ligase catalyzes the transfer of Ub to the target protein. The ubiquitinated protein is released from the complex and is recognized by factors associated with the 26S proteasome. The 26S proteasome digests the ubiquitinated protein into small peptides. The E3 enzymes are responsible for the selection of proteins for ubiquitination by this pathway, and it is thought that a large number of these enzymes exist (Freemont 2000). It has been shown that the RING-finger domain of an E3 ligase mediates interaction with the E2-conjugating enzyme and is the source of the ligase activity (Joazeiro and Weissman 2000). This suggests that recognition of target proteins by E3 ligases occurs through protein-protein interactions with areas of the protein other than the RING-finger domain. In the case of TRIM32, this function may be fulfilled by a series of NHL domains. NHL domains have been shown to be important for the function of a number of proteins—including LIN-41, in Caenorhabditis elegans, and brat, in Drosophila melanogaster, both of which act as posttranscriptional repressors. Of the seven apparent loss-of-function lin-41 mutations that are discussed by Slack et al. (2000), five lead to amino acid substitutions found in the NHL domains (Slack et al. 2000). Loss-of-function brat mutations include both deletions of the NHL domains and missense mutations (Arama et al. 2000; Sonoda and Wharton 2001). All of these mutations abolish an interaction with another protein, thereby leading to functional consequences. This information suggests interesting possibilities as to the role of TRIM32 in LGMD. If TRIM32 is indeed an E3-Ub ligase, then the NHL domains could mediate interaction either with other members of an E3-Ub–ligase complex or with the proteins that the complex targets to the proteasome. Because of both the limited distribution of symptoms in patients with LGMD2H and the wide tissue distribution of TRIM32, it is tantalizing to postulate that the third NHL repeat is involved in the interaction with—and, therefore, the targeting of—one or a group of proteins to the proteasome to be degraded. A mutation in the NHL domain would prevent this process, and these target proteins would accumulate to higher concentrations. The restriction of symptoms to muscle tissue may have two explanations: (1) the third NHL domain may be interacting with muscle-specific proteins; and (2) although the increased level of proteins is not restricted to muscle, it may have a toxic effect only in muscle. Increased levels of some proteins have been reported to cause myopathic symptoms, as has been shown in work involving transgenic mouse lines that overexpress either caveolin-3 (Galbiati et al. 2000) or γ-sarcoglycan (Zhu et al. 2001). Furthermore, the gene mutated in rare forms of Parkinson disease, PARK2, is thought to work via a similar pathogenic mechanism. Parkin, the product of PARK2, is known to be a RING-finger–containing E3-Ub ligase (Shimura et al. 2000). The neuronal death seen in Parkinson disease is thought to be a direct result of the accumulation of proteins that are no longer ubiquitinated by mutant forms of parkin and that, therefore, are not degraded by the proteasome (Imai et al. 2001; Shimura et al. 2001). Studies to determine whether TRIM32 is indeed an E3-Ub ligase and to identify a similar pathogenic mechanism in parkin are currently under way. Acknowledgments We are indebted to the patients and their families for their participation in this study. We thank Drs. D. Merz, S. Pind, S. Schweiger, B. Triggs-Raine, M. Walter, and T. Zelinski, for helpful discussions; Dr. S. Povey, for help in defining the candidate region; and Drs. M. DelBigio and R. Rhodes, for providing muscle-biopsy samples. This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the Muscular Dystrophy Association of Canada, the Children’s Hospital Foundation of Manitoba, the Manitoba Health Research Council, and the Canadian Genetic Diseases Network (Networks of Centres of Excellence program). Electronic-Database Information Accession numbers and URLs for data in this article are as follows: Celera Publication Site, http://public.celera.com/cds/login.cfm (for Genomic Scaffold GA_x54KRCDB2PK: 3500001–4500000). Codon Usage Database, http://www.kazusa.or.jp/codon/ Fondation Jean Dausset–CEPH, http://www.cephb.fr/ GenBank, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/ (for PAPPA cDNA [accession number NM_002581.1], PAPPA genomic DNA [accession number AB020878], ASTN2 cDNA [accession number AF116574.1], TRIM32 cDNA [accession number NM_012210.2], and IMAGE:2591170 [accession number AW090658.2]). InterPro, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/ (for RING-finger domain [accession number IPR001841], B1 box [accession number IPR002991], coiled-coil domain [accession number IPR003649], and NHL domains [accession number IPR001258]). Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/ (for LGMD2H [MIM 254110]). UCSC Human Genome Project Working Draft (“Golden Path”), http://genome.ucsc.edu/ (for April 2001 freeze). UK Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, http://www.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk/ (for NIX package, which includes Grail, Genefinder, Genemark, Fex, Hexon, and Fgene). UniGene, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/UniGene/ (for TRIM32 [accession number Hs.236218]). References Antonarakis SE, Nomenclature Working Group (1998) Recommendations for a nomenclature system for human gene mutations. Hum Mutat 11:1–3 [PubMed] Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Birney E, Biswas M, Bucher P, et al (2001) The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Nucleic Acids Res 29:37–40 [PubMed] Arama E, Dickman D, Kimchie Z, Shearn A, Lev Z (2000) Mutations in the β-propeller domain of the Drosophila brain tumor (brat) protein induce neoplasm in the larval brain. Oncogene 19:3706–3716 [PubMed] Barinaga M (1999) A new finger on the protein destruction button. Science 286:223–225 [PubMed] Bushby KM (1999a) The limb-girdle muscular dystrophies: multiple genes, multiple mechanisms. Hum Mol Genet 8:1875–1882 [PubMed] ——— (1999b) Making sense of the limb-girdle muscular dystrophies. Brain 122:1403–1420 [PubMed] Conover CA, Oxvig C, Overgaard MT, Christiansen M, Giudice LC (1999) Evidence that the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 protease in human ovarian follicular fluid is pregnancy associated plasma protein-A. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4742–4745 [PubMed] Edmondson JC, Liem RK, Kuster JE, Hatten ME (1988) Astrotactin: a novel neuronal cell surface antigen that mediates neuron-astroglial interactions in cerebellar microcultures. J Cell Biol 106:505–517 [PubMed] Freemont PS (2000) RING for destruction? Curr Biol 10:R84–R87 [PubMed] Fridell RA, Harding LS, Bogerd HP, Cullen BR (1995) Identification of a novel human zinc finger protein that specifically interacts with the activation domain of lentiviral Tat proteins. Virology 209:347–357 [PubMed] Galbiati F, Volonte D, Chu JB, Li M, Fine SW, Fu M, Bermudez J, Pedemonte M, Weidenheim KM, Pestell RG, Minetti C, Lisanti MP (2000) Transgenic overexpression of caveolin-3 in skeletal muscle fibers induces a Duchenne-like muscular dystrophy phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9689–9694 [PubMed] Imai Y, Soda M, Inoue H, Hattori N, Mizuno Y, Takahashi R (2001) An unfolded putative transmembrane polypeptide, which can lead to endoplasmic reticulum stress, is a substrate of parkin. Cell 105:891–902 [PubMed] Joazeiro CA, Weissman AM (2000) RING finger proteins: mediators of ubiquitin ligase activity. Cell 102:549–552 [PubMed] Kaplan J (2001) Neuromuscular disorders: gene location. Neuromuscul Disord 11:323–331 [PubMed] Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, Devon K, et al (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860–921 [PubMed] Lawrence JB, Oxvig C, Overgaard MT, Sottrup-Jensen L, Gleich GJ, Hays LG, Yates JR III, Conover CA (1999) The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-dependent IGF binding protein-4 protease secreted by human fibroblasts is pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:3149–3153 [PubMed] Liu HX, Cartegni L, Zhang MQ, Krainer AR (2001) A mechanism for exon skipping caused by nonsense or missense mutations in BRCA1 and other genes. Nat Genet 27:55–58 [PubMed] Liu HX, Zhang M, Krainer AR (1998) Identification of functional exonic splicing enhancer motifs recognized by individual SR proteins. Genes Dev 12:1998–2012 [PubMed] Reymond A, Meroni G, Fantozzi A, Merla G, Cairo S, Luzi L, Riganelli D, Zanaria E, Messali S, Cainarca S, Guffanti A, Minucci S, Pelicci PG, Ballabio A (2001) The tripartite motif family identifies cell compartments. EMBO J 20:2140–2151 [PubMed] Shen LX, Basilion JP, Stanton VP Jr (1999) Single-nucleotide polymorphisms can cause different structural folds of mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7871–7876 [PubMed] Shimura H, Hattori N, Kubo S, Mizuno Y, Asakawa S, Minoshima S, Shimizu N, Iwai K, Chiba T, Tanaka K, Suzuki T (2000) Familial Parkinson disease gene product, parkin, is a ubiquitin-protein ligase. Nat Genet 25:302–305 [PubMed] Shimura H, Schlossmacher MG, Hattori N, Frosch MP, Trockenbacher A, Schneider R, Mizuno Y, Kosik KS, Selkoe DJ (2001) Ubiquitination of a new form of α-synuclein by parkin from human brain: implications for Parkinson's disease. Science 293:263–269 [PubMed] Shokeir MH, Kobrinsky NL (1976) Autosomal recessive muscular dystrophy in Manitoba Hutterites. Clin Genet 9:197–202 [PubMed] Shokeir MH, Rozdilsky B (1985) Muscular dystrophy in Saskatchewan Hutterites. Am J Med Genet 22:487–493 [PubMed] Silahtaroglu AN, Tumer Z, Kristensen T, Sottrup-Jensen L, Tommerup N (1993) Assignment of the human gene for pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPPA) to 9q33.1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization to mitotic and meiotic chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 62:214–216 [PubMed] Slack FJ, Basson M, Liu Z, Ambros V, Horvitz HR, Ruvkun G (2000) The lin-41 RBCC gene acts in the C. elegans heterochronic pathway between the let-7 regulatory RNA and the LIN-29 transcription factor. Mol Cell 5:659–669 [PubMed] Slack FJ, Ruvkun G (1998) A novel repeat domain that is often associated with RING finger and B-box motifs. Trends Biochem Sci 23:474–475 [PubMed] Sonoda J, Wharton RP (2001) Drosophila brain tumor is a translational repressor. Genes Dev 15:762–773 [PubMed] Torok M, Etkin LD (2001) Two B or not two B? overview of the rapidly expanding B-box family of proteins. Differentiation 67:63–71 [PubMed] Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, Smith HO, et al (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science 291:1304–1351 [PubMed] Weiler T, Greenberg CR, Nylen E, Morgan K, Fujiwara TM, Crumley MJ, Zelinski T, Halliday W, Nickel B, Triggs-Raine B, Wrogemann K (1997) Limb girdle muscular dystrophy in Manitoba Hutterites does not map to any of the known LGMD loci. Am J Med Genet 72:363–368 [PubMed] Weiler T, Greenberg CR, Zelinski T, Nylen E, Coghlan G, Crumley MJ, Fujiwara TM, Morgan K, Wrogemann K (1998) A gene for autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy in Manitoba Hutterites maps to chromosome region 9q31-q33: evidence for another limb-girdle muscular dystrophy locus. Am J Hum Genet 63:140–147 [PubMed] Zhu X, Hadhazy M, Groh ME, Wheeler MT, Wollmann R, McNally EM (2001) Overexpression of γ-sarcoglycan induces severe muscular dystrophy: implications for the regulation of sarcoglycan assembly. J Biol Chem 276:21785–21790 [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Hum Mol Genet. 1999; 8(10):1875-82.
[Hum Mol Genet. 1999]Neuromuscul Disord. 2001 Apr; 11(3):323-331.
[Neuromuscul Disord. 2001]Clin Genet. 1976 Feb; 9(2):197-202.
[Clin Genet. 1976]Am J Med Genet. 1997 Oct 31; 72(3):363-8.
[Am J Med Genet. 1997]Brain. 1999 Aug; 122 ( Pt 8)():1403-20.
[Brain. 1999]Am J Med Genet. 1985 Nov; 22(3):487-93.
[Am J Med Genet. 1985]Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jul; 63(1):140-7.
[Am J Hum Genet. 1998]Nature. 2001 Feb 15; 409(6822):860-921.
[Nature. 2001]Science. 2001 Feb 16; 291(5507):1304-51.
[Science. 2001]EMBO J. 2001 May 1; 20(9):2140-51.
[EMBO J. 2001]Cell. 2000 Sep 1; 102(5):549-52.
[Cell. 2000]Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jul; 63(1):140-7.
[Am J Hum Genet. 1998]Hum Mutat. 1998; 11(1):1-3.
[Hum Mutat. 1998]Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1993; 62(4):214-6.
[Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1993]J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Dec; 84(12):4742-5.
[J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 16; 96(6):3149-53.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]J Cell Biol. 1988 Feb; 106(2):505-17.
[J Cell Biol. 1988]Virology. 1995 Jun 1; 209(2):347-57.
[Virology. 1995]Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1993; 62(4):214-6.
[Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1993]J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Dec; 84(12):4742-5.
[J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 16; 96(6):3149-53.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]J Cell Biol. 1988 Feb; 106(2):505-17.
[J Cell Biol. 1988]Virology. 1995 Jun 1; 209(2):347-57.
[Virology. 1995]EMBO J. 2001 May 1; 20(9):2140-51.
[EMBO J. 2001]Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jul; 63(1):140-7.
[Am J Hum Genet. 1998]Am J Med Genet. 1997 Oct 31; 72(3):363-8.
[Am J Med Genet. 1997]Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Dec; 23(12):474-5.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 1998]Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jul; 63(1):140-7.
[Am J Hum Genet. 1998]Genes Dev. 1998 Jul 1; 12(13):1998-2012.
[Genes Dev. 1998]Nat Genet. 2001 Jan; 27(1):55-8.
[Nat Genet. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6; 96(14):7871-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Dec; 23(12):474-5.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 1998]Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Jan 1; 29(1):37-40.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2001]EMBO J. 2001 May 1; 20(9):2140-51.
[EMBO J. 2001]Differentiation. 2001 Mar; 67(3):63-71.
[Differentiation. 2001]Science. 1999 Oct 8; 286(5438):223, 225.
[Science. 1999]Curr Biol. 2000 Jan 27; 10(2):R84-7.
[Curr Biol. 2000]Curr Biol. 2000 Jan 27; 10(2):R84-7.
[Curr Biol. 2000]Cell. 2000 Sep 1; 102(5):549-52.
[Cell. 2000]Mol Cell. 2000 Apr; 5(4):659-69.
[Mol Cell. 2000]Oncogene. 2000 Aug 3; 19(33):3706-16.
[Oncogene. 2000]Genes Dev. 2001 Mar 15; 15(6):762-73.
[Genes Dev. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 15; 97(17):9689-94.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2001 Jun 15; 276(24):21785-90.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]Nat Genet. 2000 Jul; 25(3):302-5.
[Nat Genet. 2000]Cell. 2001 Jun 29; 105(7):891-902.
[Cell. 2001]Science. 2001 Jul 13; 293(5528):263-9.
[Science. 2001]Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jul; 63(1):140-7.
[Am J Hum Genet. 1998]