pmc logo image
Logo of pnasPNAS Home page.Reference to the article.PNAS Info for AuthorsPNAS SubscriptionsPNAS About

Formats:

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 March 29; 91(7): 2757–2761.
PMCID: PMC43449
Evidence for two independent domestications of cattle.
R T Loftus, D E MacHugh, D G Bradley, P M Sharp, and P Cunningham
Department of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Abstract
The origin and taxonomic status of domesticated cattle are controversial. Zebu and taurine breeds are differentiated primarily by the presence or absence of a hump and have been recognized as separate species (Bos indicus and Bos taurus). However, the most widely held view is that both types of cattle derive from a single domestication event 8000-10,000 years ago. We have examined mtDNA sequences from representatives of six European (taurine) breeds, three Indian (zebu) breeds, and four African (three zebu, one taurine) breeds. Similar levels of average sequence divergence were observed among animals within each of the major continental groups: 0.41% (European), 0.38% (African), and 0.42% (Indian). However, the sequences fell into two very distinct geographic lineages that do not correspond with the taurine-zebu dichotomy: all European and African breeds are in one lineage, and all Indian breeds are in the other. There was little indication of breed clustering within either lineage. Application of a molecular clock suggests that the two major mtDNA clades diverged at least 200,000, and possibly as much as 1 million, years ago. This relatively large divergence is interpreted most simply as evidence for two separate domestication events, presumably of different subspecies of the aurochs, Bos primigenius. The clustering of all African zebu mtDNA sequences within the taurine lineage is attributed to ancestral crossbreeding with the earlier B. taurus inhabitants of the continent.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.2M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Images in this article
Click on the image to see a larger version.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Kidd KK, Osterhoff D, Erhard L, Stone WH. The use of genetic relationships among cattle breeds in the formulation of rational breeding policies: an example with South Devon (South Africa) and Gelbvieh (Germany). Anim Blood Groups Biochem Genet. 1974;5(1):21–28. [PubMed]
  • Anderson S, de Bruijn MH, Coulson AR, Eperon IC, Sanger F, Young IG. Complete sequence of bovine mitochondrial DNA. Conserved features of the mammalian mitochondrial genome. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 25;156(4):683–717. [PubMed]
  • Lindberg GL, Koehler CM, Mayfield JE, Myers AM, Beitz DC. Recovery of mitochondrial DNA from blood leukocytes using detergent lysis. Biochem Genet. 1992 Feb;30(1-2):27–33. [PubMed]
  • Murphy G, Kavanagh T. Speeding-up the sequencing of double-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Jun 10;16(11):5198–5198. [PubMed]
  • Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406–425. [PubMed]
  • Higgins DG, Bleasby AJ, Fuchs R. CLUSTAL V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992 Apr;8(2):189–191. [PubMed]
  • Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111–120. [PubMed]
  • Di Rienzo A, Wilson AC. Branching pattern in the evolutionary tree for human mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 1;88(5):1597–1601. [PubMed]
  • Vigilant L, Pennington R, Harpending H, Kocher TD, Wilson AC. Mitochondrial DNA sequences in single hairs from a southern African population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(23):9350–9354. [PubMed]
  • Saccone C, Pesole G, Sbisá E. The main regulatory region of mammalian mitochondrial DNA: structure-function model and evolutionary pattern. J Mol Evol. 1991 Jul;33(1):83–91. [PubMed]
  • Vigilant L, Stoneking M, Harpending H, Hawkes K, Wilson AC. African populations and the evolution of human mitochondrial DNA. Science. 1991 Sep 27;253(5027):1503–1507. [PubMed]
  • Ferris SD, Sage RD, Prager EM, Ritte U, Wilson AC. Mitochondrial DNA evolution in mice. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):681–721. [PubMed]
  • Stoneking M, Sherry ST, Redd AJ, Vigilant L. New approaches to dating suggest a recent age for the human mtDNA ancestor. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Aug 29;337(1280):167–175. [PubMed]
  • Perkins D., Jr Fauna of Catal Hüyük: evidence for early cattle domestication in Anatolia. Science. 1969 Apr 11;164(876):177–179. [PubMed]
  • Wayne RK, Meyer A, Lehman N, Van Valkenburgh B, Kat PW, Fuller TK, Girman D, O'Brien SJ. Large sequence divergence among mitochondrial DNA genotypes within populations of eastern African black-backed jackals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(5):1772–1776. [PubMed]
  • Manwell C, Baker CM. Chemical classification of cattle. 2. Phylogenetic tree and specific status of the Zebu. Anim Blood Groups Biochem Genet. 1980;11(3):151–162. [PubMed]
  • Graml R, Ohmayer G, Pirchner F, Erhard L, Buchberger J, Mostageer A. Biochemical polymorphism in Egyptian Baladi cattle and their relationship with other breeds. Anim Genet. 1986;17(1):61–76. [PubMed]
  • Bradley DG, MacHugh DE, Loftus RT, Sow RS, Hoste CH, Cunningham EP. Zebu-taurine variation in Y chromosomal DNA: a sensitive assay for genetic introgression in west African trypanotolerant cattle populations. Anim Genet. 1994 Feb;25(1):7–12. [PubMed]