• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of pnasPNASInfo for AuthorsSubscriptionsAboutThis Article
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct 1977; 74(10): 4542–4546.
PMCID: PMC431981

How does selection reconcile individual advantage with the good of the group?

Abstract

An individual's advantage often conflicts with the good of its group, as when an allele spreads by meiotic drive through a population whose death rate it increases, or when an asexual genotype derives immediate advantage at the expense of future adaptability. We show how selection within populations may reconcile individual and group advantage, as in the evolution of “honest meioses” resistant to segregation distortion, and the avoidance of the “cost of sex.” Selection between species, whose evolutionary importance we document, presumably favors the survival and multiplication of species whose genetic systems or social organizations favor the evolution of mechanisms reconciling individual with group advantage: in other words, species with genetic or social systems where a gene's long-term selective advantage most nearly matches its contribution to the good of the species.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.1M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1–16. [PubMed]
  • Hamilton WD. Extraordinary sex ratios. A sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology. Science. 1967 Apr 28;156(3774):477–488. [PubMed]
  • BODMER WF, EDWARDS AW. Natural selection and the sex ratio. Ann Hum Genet. 1960 Jul;24:239–244. [PubMed]
  • Zimmering S, Sandler L, Nicoletti B. Mechanisms of meiotic drive. Annu Rev Genet. 1970;4:409–436. [PubMed]
  • Prout T, Bundgaard J, Bryant S. Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. I. The solution of a special case and some general implications. Theor Popul Biol. 1973 Dec;4(4):446–465. [PubMed]
  • Thomson GJ, Feldman MW. Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. II. Linkage modification in the segregation distortion system. Theor Popul Biol. 1974 Apr;5(2):155–162. [PubMed]
  • Lande R. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet Res. 1975 Dec;26(3):221–235. [PubMed]
  • Felsenstein J, Yokoyama S. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. II. Individual selection for recombination. Genetics. 1976 Aug;83(4):845–859. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Leigh EG, Jr, Charnov EL, Warner RR. Sex ratio, sex change, and natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Oct;73(10):3656–3660. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Warner RR, Robertson DR, Leigh EG., Jr Sex change and sexual selection. Science. 1975 Nov 14;190(4215):633–638. [PubMed]
  • Wilson DS. A theory of group selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):143–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...