![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Clinical Investigation Myeloperoxidase-generated reactive nitrogen species convert LDL into an atherogenic form in vitro 1Department of Cell Biology, and2Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA3Chemistry Department, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, 44115, USA Address correspondence to: Stanley L. Hazen, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Lerner Research Institute, Department of Cell Biology, 9500 Euclid Avenue, NC-10, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. Phone: (216) 445-9763; Fax: (216) 444-9404; E-mail: hazens/at/cesmtp.ccf.org Received October 19, 1998; Accepted April 22, 1999. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Oxidized LDL is implicated in atherosclerosis; however, the pathways that convert LDL into an atherogenic form in vivo are not established. Production of reactive nitrogen species may be one important pathway, since LDL recovered from human atherosclerotic aorta is enriched in nitrotyrosine. We now report that reactive nitrogen species generated by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system of monocytes convert LDL into a form (NO2-LDL) that is avidly taken up and degraded by macrophages, leading to massive cholesterol deposition and foam cell formation, essential steps in lesion development. Incubation of LDL with isolated MPO, an H2O2-generating system, and nitrite (NO2–)— a major end-product of NO metabolism—resulted in nitration of apolipoprotein B 100 tyrosyl residues and initiation of LDL lipid peroxidation. The time course of LDL protein nitration and lipid peroxidation paralleled the acquisition of high-affinity, concentration-dependent, and saturable binding of NO2-LDL to human monocyte–derived macrophages and mouse peritoneal macrophages. LDL modification and conversion into a high-uptake form occurred in the absence of free metal ions, required NO2–, occurred at physiological levels of Cl–, and was inhibited by heme poisons, catalase, and BHT. Macrophage binding of NO2-LDL was specific and mediated by neither the LDL receptor nor the scavenger receptor class A type I. Exposure of macrophages to NO2-LDL promoted cholesteryl ester synthesis, intracellular cholesterol and cholesteryl ester accumulation, and foam cell formation. Collectively, these results identify MPO-generated reactive nitrogen species as a physiologically plausible pathway for converting LDL into an atherogenic form. Introduction Oxidative modification of LDL is implicated in atherogenesis (1–5). A key early event is believed to be the conversion of LDL into a form capable of being recognized by “scavenger” or “oxidized LDL” receptors, whose surface expression is not diminished upon exposure to excess cholesterol (1–5). Direct demonstration of the oxidation pathways responsible for rendering LDL atherogenic in vivo, however, has proved difficult because of the evanescent nature of reactive oxidant species and the noninformative products they typically produce (6). One potential pathway for LDL modification and conversion into a high-uptake form in vivo may involve reactive nitrogen species derived from nitric oxide (nitrogen monoxide, NO), a long-lived free radical that is formed by multiple vascular wall cells (7). NO is relatively unreactive toward most biomolecules and does not promote protein and lipid oxidation at neutral pH. However, a variety of reactive nitrogen species derived from NO are capable of damaging biologic targets (8–14). Antibodies specific for nitrotyrosine, a marker for protein damage by reactive nitrogen species (9, 14, 15), recognize epitopes in human atheroma but not in adjacent normal aortic intima (16). Mass spectrometric studies demonstrated nearly 100-fold–higher levels of nitrotyrosine in LDL recovered from human atherosclerotic aortae compared with LDL isolated from plasma of healthy donors (17). Thus, multiple lines of evidence suggest that nitrating intermediates promote LDL oxidation in the human artery wall during atherosclerosis; however, the precise nitrating intermediates formed, the pathways responsible for their generation in vivo, and the biologic consequences of LDL nitration are still unknown. The most well-studied pathway for generating nitrating intermediates from NO involves formation of peroxynitrite (ONOO–), a product of NO and superoxide (O2–) (12). Bolus addition of reagent ONOO– to biologic targets promotes nitration of protein tyrosyl residues (14), depletes lipid-soluble antioxidants (18, 19), and initiates lipid peroxidation (11, 13). Multiple cellular components of human atherosclerotic lesions produce both O2– and NO (7), suggesting that ONOO– may contribute to LDL oxidation and nitrotyrosine formation in human atherosclerotic lesions. Recent studies have questioned the significance of ONOO– in mediating protein nitration in vivo, however, because of the inefficient tyrosine nitration observed when this oxidizing agent is formed in situ at physiological pH and low equivalent fluxes of NO and O2– (20). Moreover, enhanced NO production by macrophages has been shown to have a protective effect on the extent of cell-mediated oxidative damage of LDL (8). Another potential pathway for generating reactive nitrogen species in vivo has recently been described that involves myeloperoxidase (MPO), an enzyme implicated in atherosclerosis. MPO is an abundant heme protein that is secreted from activated phagocytes (21). It amplifies the oxidizing potential of H2O2 by using it as cosubstrate to generate a variety of cytotoxic oxidants (22–27). Antibodies specific for MPO demonstrate that the enzyme is localized in human atherosclerotic lesions (28). One major and unique oxidant formed by MPO in vivo is hypochlorous acid (HOCl), a potent chlorinating agent generated by the oxidation of chloride (23, 29, 30). Both mass spectrometric and immunohistochemical studies demonstrate that HOCl-generated protein oxidation products are enriched in human atherosclerotic aortic intima and LDL recovered from human atherosclerotic lesions (29, 31). Thus, MPO-generated oxidants are formed in diseased human vascular tissues. Several recent studies demonstrate that MPO also utilizes H2O2 and nitrite (NO2–), the autoxidation product of NO, as cosubstrates to generate a microbicidal oxidant (32) capable of nitrating phenolic compounds and proteins in vitro (25, 26, 33, 34). NO2– is ubiquitous in biologic tissues and fluids (25). Plasma and extracellular levels of NO2– are markedly increased in inflammatory and infectious processes in which NO production is enhanced (35–37). Studies with isolated MPO and human neutrophils demonstrate that the enzyme catalyzes aromatic nitration in media containing concentrations of NO2– approximating those found in biologic fluids, confirming that this major NO metabolite can serve as a physiological substrate for MPO in the presence of plasma levels of chloride (26, 38). Here, we explore the role of MPO-generated reactive nitrogen species in converting LDL into a novel proatherogenic form. We now report that exposure of LDL to the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system of phagocytes results in concomitant apo B-100 protein nitration, induction of LDL lipid peroxidation, and conversion of the lipoprotein into a form capable of promoting macrophage cholesteryl ester accumulation and foam cell formation, essential steps in the atherosclerotic process. Methods Materials. L-[13C6]tyrosine was purchased from Cambridge Isotopes Inc. (Andover, Massachusetts, USA). Tissue culture media and additives were purchased from Life Technologies Inc. (Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA). [125I]NaI and [14C]oleate were supplied by ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Costa Mesa, California, USA). C57BL/6 mice (16–20 weeks of age) were purchased from the Trudeau Institute (Saranac Lake, New York, USA). THP-1 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Maryland, USA). All other reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) unless otherwise specified. General procedures. All buffers were passed over a column of Chelex-100 resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, California, USA) and supplemented with diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) to remove any potential transition metal ions that might catalyze LDL oxidation during incubations. Peroxynitrite was synthesized and quantified as described (14). L-3-[13C6]nitrotyrosine was made from L-[13C6]tyrosine and peroxynitrite and was isolated by reverse-phase HPLC to remove residual NO2– before use (17). Protein content was determined by the Markwell-modified Lowry protein assay (39), with BSA as standard. Production of H2O2 by glucose/glucose oxidase (GGOx) was quantified by oxidation of Fe(II) and formation of an Fe(III)-thiocyanate complex (25). The concentration of reagent H2O2 was determined spectrophotometrically (ε240 = 39.4 M-1/cm-1; ref. 40). LDL was acetylated with acetic acid anhydride (41). Acetylated lipoproteins were dialyzed against 0.15 M NaCl, 0.3 mM Na2EDTA, and 100 μM DTPA (pH 7.4). LDL labeling with [125I]NaI and agarose gel electrophoresis were performed as described previously (42). The specific activity of labeled LDL preparations was between 100 and 250 dpm/ng protein. Cholesterol and cholesteryl ester content, and cholesteryl [14C]oleate synthesis by cells incubated with the indicated lipoproteins (50 μg/mL), were determined by published methods (41). α-tocopherol levels were determined as described (43). LDL concentrations are expressed as milligrams of protein per milliliter. MPO and lipoprotein isolation. MPO (donor: hydrogen peroxide, oxidoreductase, EC 1.11.1.7) was initially purified from detergent extracts of human leukocytes by sequential lectin affinity and gel filtration chromatography as described by Rakita et al. (44). Trace levels of contaminating eosinophil peroxidase were then removed by passage over a sulfopropyl Sephadex column (45). Purity of isolated MPO was established by demonstrating an RZ of 0.87 (A430/A280), SDS-PAGE analysis with Coomassie blue staining, and in-gel tetramethylbenzidine peroxidase staining (46). Enzyme concentration was determined spectrophotometrically utilizing an extinction coefficient of 89,000 M-1/cm-1/heme of MPO (22). The concentration of the MPO dimer was calculated as half the indicated concentration of heme-like chromophore. LDL was isolated from fresh plasma by sequential ultracentrifugation as a 1.019 < d < 1.063 g/mL fraction (47). Final preparations were placed in 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0), 200 μM DTPA (by passage over 10-DG desalting columns; Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.) and stored under N2 until use. Lipoprotein oxidation. NO2-LDL was prepared by incubating LDL (0.2 mg protein/mL) at 37°C in 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0), 100 μM DTPA in the presence of 30 nM MPO, 100 μg/mL glucose, 20 ng/mL glucose oxidase (grade II; Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA), and 0.5 mM NaNO2 for 8 hours unless otherwise specified. Preliminary studies demonstrated that under these conditions, a constant flux of H2O2 (0.18 μM/min) is generated by the GGOx system. Unless otherwise stated, oxidation reactions were terminated by addition of 40 μM butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT; from a 100 mM ethanolic stock) and 300 nM catalase to the reaction mixture. Preliminary studies demonstrated that monocytes isolated by methods that use adhesion/washing steps contained less MPO per cell (presumably because of some premature degranulation during the isolation procedure). Human peripheral blood monocytes used for LDL oxidation were therefore isolated by elutriation (48). Monocytes (1 × 106/mL) were incubated with LDL (0.2 mg/mL) in HBSS (magnesium-, calcium-, phenol-, and bicarbonate-free; pH 7.20) supplemented with DTPA (100 μM) for 8 hours at 37°C in the presence of the additions or deletions indicated. Reactions were terminated by addition of BHT (20 μM) and pelleting of cells. Oxidation of LDL (0.2 mg/mL) by copper was performed by dialysis vs. 5 μM CuSO4 in PBS for 24 hours. Oxidation was terminated by addition of BHT (40 μM) and dialysis against PBS containing DTPA (100 μM). Aggregated LDL for cytochalasin D experiments was produced by vortexing solutions of LDL (500 μg/mL in 0.15 M NaCl, 0.3 mM Na2EDTA, 40 μM BHT). Analysis of lipid peroxidation products. Lipids were extracted by a modified Dole procedure as described by Savenkova et al. (49). Lipids were dried under nitrogen and resuspended in 1% sodium dodecylsulfate, and total lipid hydroperoxides were then measured as described (50). Total (free and esterified) 9-hydroxy-10,12-octadecadienoic acid + 9-hydroperoxy-10,12-octadecadienoic acid [9-H(P)ODE] formed was determined by reverse-phase HPLC of triphenylphosphine-reduced lipid extracts after base hydrolysis as described previously (49). Authentic (E,Z)-9-hydroxy-10,12-octadecadienoic acid (9-HODE; Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) was used as standard. Cholesteryl-9-hydroxy-10,12-octadecadienoate + cholesteryl-9-hydroperoxy-10,12-octadecadienoate [9-H(P)ODE] was quantified by reverse-phase HPLC of triphenylphosphine-reduced lipid extracts (not subjected to base hydrolysis) as described (49). (E,Z)-cholest-5-en-ol(3β)-9-hydroxy-10,12-octadecadienoate (cholesteryl-9-HODE; Cayman Chemical Co.) was used as standard. The content of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reactive products in LDL preparations was determined by fluorescence analysis (51) in the presence of 0.05% (wt/vol) BHT. Fluorescence measurements (2-nm slit width, excitation 515 nm, emission 553 nm) were made on an LS-3 Fluorescence Spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, Connecticut, USA) using an external calibration curve constructed with known amounts of malondialdehyde (MDA) obtained from hydrolysis of 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane in 20% acetic acid (pH 3.5). Total lipid hydroperoxides, total 9-H(P)ODE, cholesteryl-9-H(P)ODE, and TBA reactive products are expressed as nanomole of oxidation product per milligram of LDL protein. Analysis of LDL protein oxidation products and amino acids. Nitrotyrosine content was determined by stable isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) on a Turbomass Spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer Corp.) equipped with chemical ionization probe. Briefly, reactions were terminated by addition of BHT and catalase as already described here; lipids and salts were removed by extraction with a single-phase solvent mixture of H2O/water-washed diethyl ether/methanol (1:3:7, vol/vol/vol) (52); and the nitrotyrosine content in amino acid hydrolysates was determined after reduction to amino tyrosine as an n-propyl, per heptafluorobutyryl derivative (53). Nitrotyrosine content is normalized to the content of tyrosine determined by stable isotope dilution GC/MS (24). Samples from time-course experiments quantifying remaining lysine and tryptophan residues were quenched with addition of 200 μM BHT and immediately analyzed. Unmodified lysine residues in LDL were quantified by fluorescamine fluorescence (54). Nα-acetyl lysine was used as standard to construct an external calibration curve. The fluorescence of treated samples was expressed relative to that of native LDL, assuming that the lipoprotein contains 341 lysine residues per particle, the number of lysines present in mature apo B-100 (55). Tryptophan fluorescence of LDL was measured using excitation and emission wavelengths of 280 nm and 335 nm, respectively (54). A linear relationship between loss of fluorescence and number of tryptophan residues oxidized was assumed. Results are expressed relative to those of native LDL; it was assumed that apo B-100 of native LDL contains 37 tryptophan residues (55). Cells. Elicited mouse peritoneal macrophages (MPMs) were harvested by peritoneal lavage with ice-cold PBS 2–3 days after thioglycollate stimulation of female C57BL/6 mice (42). Resident MPMs were similarly harvested from mice not subjected to thioglycollate stimulation. Primary cultures were prepared at a density of 106 cells per 16-mm-diameter well in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS and were used 48 hours after plating. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing mouse scavenger receptor class A type I (CHO-mSR-AI) and control vector-transfected parental CHO cells were a generous gift of M. Krieger (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) and were cultured as described elsewhere (56). Experiments were performed on confluent cell monolayers in Ham’s F-12 medium containing 3% lipoprotein-deficient FCS, BHT (20 μM), DTPA (100 μM), and catalase (300 nM). THP-1 cells were plated at a density of 0.5 × 106 cells per well and incubated with 64 nM PMA in RPMI-1640 with 10% FBS and 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol for 3 days before use. hMDMs were prepared from isolated human peripheral blood monocytes cultured 10–14 days in macrophage serum-free media (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, New York, USA) supplemented with GM-CSF (20 ng/mL) (48). Experiments with hMDMs were performed on confluent cell monolayers in the same medium containing 200 μg/mL LDL (to block LDL receptor–mediated recognition of LDL preparations), BHT (20 μM), DTPA (100 μM), and catalase (300 nM). Lipoprotein uptake, degradation, and binding by cultured cells. BHT (20 μM), catalase (300 nM), and DTPA (100 μM) were included in the media of all uptake, degradation, and binding experiments to inhibit lipoprotein oxidation during incubation with cells. Cells were washed with serum-free medium, and the indicated amounts of 125I-labeled native or modified LDL were added in 250 μL of the appropriate media. After a 5-hour incubation at 37°C, lipoprotein degradation was assessed by removal of media and quantifying TCA-soluble, noniodide degradation products (41, 42). Cells were also washed and assayed for cell-associated label and protein content (41, 42). Cell-free control experiments were performed in parallel and subtracted from counts in cell-containing reactions to calculate cell-dependent lipoprotein degradation (cell-free controls were <10% of the observed TCA-soluble counts in cell-containing reactions). Total uptake was calculated from the sum of degradation and cell-associated label. In competition experiments, 125I-labeled lipoprotein (5 μg/mL) was incubated with cells in the presence of 200 μg/mL of unlabeled competitor. Lipoprotein binding to macrophages at 4°C was determined after 4-hour incubations of the indicated amounts of modified forms of [125I]LDL, as described (41). Size exclusion chromatography. [125I]LDL (2 mg in 0.5 mL of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer [pH 7.0] containing 200 μM DTPA, 5 mg/mL BSA) was applied to a Sephacryl S400-HR column (1.0 × 45 cm) pre-equilibrated in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 200 μM DTPA. Lipoproteins were eluted at a flow rate 10 mL/h, and radioactivity in 1.1-mL fractions was determined. Statistics. Data represent the mean ± SD of the indicated number of samples. Statistical analyses were made using a paired Student’s t test. For all hypotheses, the significance level was 0.05. When multiple comparisons were made, a Bonferroni correction to the significance criterion for each test was made. Results Human monocytes use the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system to convert LDL into a high-uptake form. We hypothesized that phagocytes might use the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system to generate a nitrating intermediate that can oxidatively modify LDL, rendering it a ligand for macrophage recognition. To test this hypothesis, we incubated LDL with activated human monocytes in the absence and presence of NO2– and then determined whether the lipoprotein was converted into a high-uptake form for macrophages. LDL modified by activated human monocytes in the absence of NO2– demonstrated only a modest increase in the extent of LDL uptake by macrophages (Figure (Figure1).1
LDL oxidized by MPO, H2O2, and physiological levels of NO2– is converted into a form (NO2-LDL) that is avidly taken up and degraded by macrophages. Activated monocytes can generate a host of reactive oxidant species, which could have contributed to LDL modification and conversion into a high-uptake form. For example, direct exposure of LDL to additions of either HOCl (54, 57) or HOCl in the presence of NO2– (58) has been reported to result in lipoprotein aggregation and conversion into a high-uptake form for macrophages. Thus, a role for HOCl production by the MPO-H2O2 system of the cells could not be excluded as a contributor to the cell-dependent conversion of LDL into a form with enhanced macrophage recognition. To explore more fully the mechanism(s) through which the MPO-H2O2 system of monocytes might render LDL atherogenic, we used model systems to evaluate the ability of MPO-generated chlorinating and nitrating intermediates to convert LDL into a form that is recognized by macrophages. [125I]LDL was incubated with MPO isolated from human leukocytes, an H2O2-generating system (GGOx) that produced a low flux of peroxide similar to that which might occur in vivo, and substrate (either Cl– or NO2–, or both). The ability of the modified lipoprotein to be taken up and degraded by either hMDMs or thioglycollate-elicited MPMs was then determined. Incubation of LDL in the presence of an HOCl-generating system (MPO, GGOx, and Cl–) failed to convert the lipoprotein into a stable high-uptake form (Figure (Figure2).2
The concentration of NO2– in aortic intima is unknown. Plasma levels of NO2– are normally 1–5 μM but can increase more than 10-fold during inflammation. Because the major pathway for NO2– removal is through reaction with oxyhemoglobin-forming nitrate (NO3–), levels of NO2– in inflamed extracellular fluids and tissues are likely higher (25, 35–37). We therefore evaluated the NO2– concentration dependence of LDL modification and conversion into a high-uptake form by MPO in the absence and presence of plasma levels (100 mM) of Cl–. Incubation of LDL with MPO and an H2O2-generating system in the presence of increasing concentrations of NO2– resulted in progressively enhanced association, uptake, and degradation of the modified lipoprotein by all macrophages examined, i.e., both resident and elicited MPMs, THP-1 cells (a human acute monocytic leukemia cell line), and hMDMs. Data for lipoprotein uptake after modification by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system in the absence and presence of Cl– by hMDMs (Figure (Figure3a)3
The MPO-H2O2-NO2– system promotes LDL protein nitration and induces LDL lipid peroxidation. The nitrating intermediate formed by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system is known to promote nitration of aromatic compounds and soluble proteins (25, 26); however, the products formed by this reactive intermediate after incubation with lipids and lipoproteins have not yet been reported. This is of particular interest because nitrogen dioxide (NO2), the one electron oxidation product of NO2–, has been suggested to be the reactive nitrogen species formed during peroxidase-catalyzed oxidation of NO2– (25). NO2 is known to initiate lipid peroxidation both in vitro and after inhalation (59, 60); thus, exposure of LDL to the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system might also represent a mechanism to promote lipid peroxidation. To test this hypothesis, we determined whether markers of protein and lipid oxidation, such as LDL nitrotyrosine content and TBA reactive products, were increased in LDL preparations after exposure to MPO, NO2–, and an H2O2-generating system, using conditions that convert the lipoprotein into a high-uptake form for macrophages. Incubation of LDL with MPO-generated reactive nitrogen species resulted in concomitant conversion of the lipoprotein into a high-uptake form for elicited MPM, nitration of apo B-100 tyrosine residues, and induction of lipid peroxidation (Figure (Figure4).4
Multiple protein and lipid components of LDL are modified by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system during the acquisition of macrophage recognition. In the next set of experiments, we studied the time course of LDL conversion into a high-uptake form after exposure to MPO, NO2–, and a low steady flux of H2O2 (Figure (Figure5).5
To characterize LDL preparations after exposure to MPO-generated reactive nitrogen species, we first examined several markers of protein modification during the same time interval over which macrophage recognition of the nitrated lipoprotein occurred (Figure (Figure5).5 Exposure of LDL to MPO, NO2–, and an H2O2-generating system resulted in rapid initiation of LDL lipid peroxidation (Figure (Figure7).7 LDL modified by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system is not aggregated. Aggregation of LDL represents one mechanism for conversion of the lipoprotein into a high-uptake form (63, 64). A number of modifications, including exposure to reagent HOCl and other types of oxidation, result in LDL aggregation (54, 57, 65, 66). Preliminary studies suggested that NO2-LDL was not aggregated, because only negligible amounts (<0.1%) of the lipoprotein failed to enter 0.5% agarose gels during electrophoresis and because no significant light scattering in NO2-LDL preparations was observed. To exclude more fully the possibility that small LDL aggregates formed during modification by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system might contribute to the observed enhanced uptake and degradation by macrophages, additional experiments were performed. No evidence of particle aggregation in NO2-LDL preparations was observed during analysis by size exclusion chromatography (Figure (Figure8a).8
Macrophage binding of LDL modified by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system is saturable and specific. The lack of lipoprotein aggregation after modification by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system, and the inability of cytochalasin D to significantly inhibit macrophage uptake and degradation of NO2-LDL, suggested that cellular recognition was likely mediated through a receptor-mediated process. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether [125I]NO2-LDL binding and degradation by MPMs were saturable and specific. Macrophage binding of LDL that was nitrated by the complete MPO-H2O2-NO2– system was saturable (Figure (Figure9a).9
Macrophage recognition of LDL modified by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system occurs through a pathway independent of the class A type I scavenger receptor. Increased macrophage binding, uptake, and degradation of [125I]LDL modified by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system, which is saturable and not inhibited by excess native LDL, suggests that the nitrated lipoprotein is being bound and internalized by a receptor that is not the LDL receptor. To characterize the nature of the macrophage receptor mediating recognition of NO2-LDL, we initially performed competition studies using known inhibitors of scavenger receptor class A. Excess polyanionic inhibitors such as polyinosinic acid, polyguanylate, dextran sulfate, and fucoidan all failed to inhibit MPM uptake of NO2-LDL by >50% (data not shown). These results suggested that scavenger receptor class A, if involved in NO2-LDL recognition, could only partially account for the recognition of this modified form of LDL. To assess further whether the classic scavenger receptor participates in the recognition of NO2-LDL, we examined the uptake and degradation of the nitrated lipoprotein using CHO cells expressing mSR-AI. CHO-mSR-AI demonstrated significant uptake and degradation of both acetylated LDL and copper-oxidized LDL when compared with control vector-transfected CHO cells, as reported previously (56). In contrast, there was only a negligible increase in the uptake and degradation of NO2-LDL by CHO-mSR-AI cells compared with control vector-transfected cells (Figure (Figure10).10
LDL modified by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system promotes macrophage cholesteryl ester synthesis, lipid loading, and foam cell formation. Protein nitration, induction of lipid peroxidation, and conversion of the lipoprotein into a high-uptake form are all properties consistent with conversion of LDL into a proatherogenic form. To determine whether LDL modification by MPO-generated reactive nitrogen species might contribute to cholesterol accumulation in macrophages, a critical process in lesion development, we first evaluated the ability of NO2-LDL to stimulate cholesteryl ester biosynthesis by MPMs. NO2-LDL markedly stimulated [14C]oleate incorporation into cellular cholesteryl ester pools in MPMs (Figure (Figure11a).11
In a final set of experiments, we examined whether stimulation of cholesteryl ester biosynthesis and cellular lipid accumulation in macrophages incubated with NO2-LDL resulted in the formation of lipid-laden foam cells, an early cellular event in the atherosclerotic process. Thioglycollate-elicited MPMs were incubated for 72 hours with either native LDL (negative control), acetylated LDL (positive control), NO2-LDL, or LDL exposed to MPO and H2O2 in the absence of NO2–, and then microscopically examined after neutral lipid staining with oil red O. LDL nitrated by MPO promoted massive cholesterol deposition in macrophages (Figure (Figure12).12
Discussion Reactive nitrogen species have been implicated in promoting oxidative damage of LDL and tissues in atherosclerosis (16, 17). However, neither the pathways for nitrating LDL in vivo nor the biologic consequences of these reactions are established. The results of the current study demonstrate that nitrating intermediates formed by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system of monocytes mediate LDL protein nitration, initiate LDL lipid peroxidation, and convert the lipoprotein into a form that promotes cholesterol deposition in macrophages and foam cell formation. Despite intense interest in the role of reactive nitrogen species in inflammatory injury and vascular disease, few studies have examined the effects of nitrating intermediates on LDL recognition by macrophages. LDL incubated with SIN-1, a compound that spontaneously decomposes to generate comparable rates of O2– and NO production, results in increased levels of lipid peroxidation products but does not generate a high-uptake form of LDL (8, 13). Studies examining the effects of modulators of NO synthesis on phorbol ester–stimulated MPMs are consistent with NO playing a protective role, as increased NO production inhibited, and decreased NO production promoted, LDL oxidation and conversion into a high-uptake form (8). LDL exposed to reagent ONOO– has been shown to promote macrophage cholesteryl ester biosynthesis (13). However, the mechanism(s) of cell recognition of ONOO–-modified lipoproteins has not yet been examined. Several observations suggest that macrophage recognition of ONOO–-modified LDL occurs through mechanisms distinct from those involved with LDL modified by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system. Stimulation of macrophage cholesteryl oleate synthesis by ONOO–-treated LDL requires millimolar quantities of oxidant and extensive LDL modification (~60% lysine modification, REM > 2) (13). In contrast, modification into a high-uptake form by MPO-generated nitrating intermediates requires only low levels of H2O2, results in minimal depletion of free lysine residues, and only modestly enhances lipoprotein REM (Figure (Figure6).6 In contrast, multiple lines of evidence suggest that macrophage uptake of LDL modified by MPO, H2O2, and NO2– occurs via a pathway involving receptor-mediated endocytosis rather than phagocytosis. Binding of NO2-LDL to macrophages occurred through a high-affinity, saturable, and specific interaction — characteristics of a receptor-mediated process. Moreover, uptake and degradation of the modified lipoprotein were saturable, unlike bulk-phase phagocytosis of lipoprotein aggregates (63, 64). Competition studies examining [125I]NO2-LDL binding, uptake, and degradation by macrophages further confirm the specificity of the interaction because excess nonlabeled NO2-LDL was an effective competitor, but native LDL and LDL modified in the presence of MPO and H2O2 without NO2– were not. Finally, lipoprotein aggregation during oxidative modification by the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system was excluded by a variety of methods including size exclusion chromatography, light scattering, gel electrophoresis, and cytochalasin D treatment of macrophages. The distinction between macrophage uptake and degradation of an aggregated lipoprotein compared with a monomeric/soluble oxidized lipoprotein also underscores the unexpected findings observed when examining the potential role of MPO-generated chlorinating and nitrating intermediates in conversion of LDL into a high-uptake form. Previous studies reported by Hazell et al. (57) noted that LDL treatment with reagent HOCl becomes aggregated and, like other aggregated forms of lipoproteins, promotes intracellular lipid accumulation in macrophages (54). However, in the present study, LDL incubated with either activated human monocytes in Cl–-containing media (Figure (Figure1)1 Because of the high concentrations of Cl– in biologic matrices, reactive chlorinating species have routinely been thought to be the predominant oxidant formed by the MPO-H2O2 system of phagocytes in vivo (21–24). However, the results of the present study clearly demonstrate that MPO (either isolated or derived from activated monocytes) utilizes NO2– to convert LDL into a form that binds to, and is taken up and degraded by, macrophages, even in the presence of plasma levels of Cl–. Furthermore, these results also demonstrate that HOCl formation is not obligatory for MPO- and NO2–-dependent conversion of LDL into a high-uptake form. Consequently, many of the experiments described in the present study were performed with no Cl– present during the oxidation reaction because from a mechanistic standpoint, it is then possible to demonstrate that both the alterations in the biologic end points examined (e.g., binding, cell association, uptake, degradation, sterol accumulation) and the oxidation products formed (e.g., nitrotyrosine, various lipid peroxidation products) are the result of an oxidant species derived from MPO-dependent oxidation of NO2–. Although the nitrating intermediate(s) formed by the reaction of NO2– with the MPO-H2O2 system has not been identified, NO2 (the one electron oxidation product of NO2–) and NO2Cl (formed by reaction of HOCl with NO2–) have been implicated (25, 26, 33). Thus, under physiological conditions in which both Cl– and NO2– are present, a variety of halogenating and nitrating intermediates may be formed by MPO (24, 25, 30, 33, 52). The product(s) of the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system is anticipated to be particularly effective at converting LDL into a high-uptake form for intimal macrophages. Despite evidence suggesting that a receptor-mediated pathway is involved in macrophage recognition of NO2-LDL, the identity of the receptor and ligand mediating the interaction is unknown. Experiments using CHO cells expressing mSR-AI demonstrated no difference in NO2-LDL binding, uptake, or degradation when compared with control vector-transfected CHO cells, strongly suggesting that class A type I scavenger receptor does not participate in recognition of the nitrated lipoprotein. This lack of recognition is consistent with the relatively low level of apo B-100 lysine blockage and REM observed (Figure (Figure6)6 The ability of modified forms of LDL to promote accumulation of cellular cholesteryl esters has been widely accepted as an index of the atherogenic potential of a lipoprotein. While our studies show that incubation of LDL with activated monocytes in the presence NO2– transforms the lipoprotein into a high-uptake form, the biologic significance of this type of modification in vivo is not yet established. All of the in vitro cell experiments in the present study were performed under serum-free conditions. Whether or not the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system of monocytes effectively modifies LDL in a more physiological, serum/plasma- containing milieu remains to be explored. However, considerable evidence suggests that MPO may contribute to nitration of LDL in human atheroma because all of the components of the MPO-H2O2-NO2– system are present and available for lipoprotein and tissue oxidative damage in human lesions, and products of this pathway — e.g., nitrotyrosine (16, 17), dityrosine (70), and lipid hydroperoxides (43, 71) — are enriched in human lesions. Indeed, immunohistochemical staining demonstrates that MPO colocalizes with lipid-laden macrophages (28), and our recent mass spectrometric studies demonstrate that chlorotyrosine, a specific marker for MPO-dependent protein damage by chlorinating intermediates (24, 72, 73), is significantly enriched in LDL recovered from human aortic lesions and atherosclerotic intima (29). Thus, catalytically active MPO and sufficient levels of H2O2 to generate reactive oxidants with the enzyme are present in human vascular tissues. Moreover, the low rate of H2O2 flux used for lipoprotein modification in this study is less than that generated by circulating levels of leukocytes activated in suspension (74) or on biologic surfaces (75). Furthermore, although the actual concentration of NO2– in arterial intima is not known, the concentration of NO2– required for MPO-dependent conversion of LDL into a high-uptake form is well within the range of that observed in other inflammatory fluids and tissues (35–37). Finally, the levels of nitrotyrosine observed in apo B–containing LDL-like particles recovered from human atherosclerotic lesions (17) are several-fold greater than those observed in NO2-LDL preparations, which are avidly taken up and degraded by macrophages. Thus, MPO-generated nitrating intermediates may represent a physiologically plausible mechanism for promoting protein nitration, lipid peroxidation, and cholesterol deposition in macrophage-rich human atherosclerotic tissues. Acknowledgments We thank D.M. Driscoll and G.M. Chisolm for thoughtful comments and criticisms, H.L. Copeland for advice on statistical analyses, and P.A. Cohen and M.K. Cathcart for generously providing human monocytes used for the preparation of hMDMs in this study. We also thank Monty Krieger for generously providing CHO cells transfected with mSRA-1. This work was supported in part by a Scientist Development Grant from the American Heart Association and by National Institutes of Health grants HL-61878 and HL-62526 (to S.L. Hazen) and HL-53315 (to H.F. Hoff). References 1. Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Role of oxidized low density lipoprotein in atherogenesis. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:1785–1792. [PubMed] 2. Steinbrecher UP, Zhang HF, Lougheed M. Role of oxidatively modified LDL in atherosclerosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 1990;9:155–168. [PubMed] 3. Chisolm, G.M., and Penn, M.S. 1998. Oxidized lipoproteins and atherosclerosis. In Atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. V. Fuster, R. Ross, and E. J. Topol, editors. Lippincott-Raven Publishers. Philadelphia, PA. 129–149. 4. Berliner JA, et al. Atherosclerosis: basic mechanisms. Oxidation, inflammation, and genetics. Circulation. 1995;91:2488–2496. [PubMed] 5. Steinberg D. Lewis A. Conner Memorial Lecture. Oxidative modification of LDL and atherogenesis. Circulation. 1997;95:1062–1071. [PubMed] 6. Heinecke JW. Oxidants and antioxidants in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: implications for the oxidized low density lipoprotein hypothesis. Atherosclerosis. 1998;141:1–15. [PubMed] 7. Moncada S, Higgs A. The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:2002–2012. [PubMed] 8. Jessup W, Mohr D, Gieseg SP, Dean RT, Stocker R. The participation of nitric oxide in cell free- and its restriction of macrophage-mediated oxidation of low-density lipoprotein. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1992;1180:73–82. [PubMed] 9. van der Vliet A, Eiserich JP, Kaur H, Cross CE, Halliwell B. Nitrotyrosine as biomarker for reactive nitrogen species. Methods Enzymol. 1996;269:175–184. [PubMed] 10. Lymar SV, Jiang Q, Hurst JK. Mechanism of carbon dioxide–catalyzed oxidation of tyrosine by peroxynitrite. Biochemistry. 1996;35:7855–7861. [PubMed] 11. Radi R, Beckman JS, Bush KM, Freeman BA. Peroxynitrite-induced membrane lipid peroxidation: the cytotoxic potential of superoxide and nitric oxide. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1991;288:481–487. [PubMed] 12. Beckman JS, Beckman TW, Chen J, Marshall PA, Freeman BA. Apparent hydroxyl radical production by peroxynitrite: implications for endothelial injury from nitric oxide and superoxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:1620–1624. [PubMed] 13. Graham A, et al. Peroxynitrite modification of low-density lipoprotein leads to recognition by the macrophage scavenger receptor. FEBS Lett. 1993;330:181–185. [PubMed] 14. Beckman JS, Chen J, Ischiropoulos H, Crow JP. Oxidative chemistry of peroxynitrite. Methods Enzymol. 1994;233:229–240. [PubMed] 15. Halliwell B. What nitrates tyrosine? Is nitrotyrosine specific as a biomarker of peroxynitrite formation in vivo? FEBS Lett. 1997;411:157–160. [PubMed] 16. Beckman JS, et al. Extensive nitration of protein tyrosines in human atherosclerosis detected by immunohistochemistry. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1993;375:81–88. 17. Leeuwenburgh C, et al. Reactive nitrogen intermediates promote low density lipoprotein oxidation in human atherosclerotic intima. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:1433–1436. [PubMed] 18. Christen S, et al. Gamma-tocopherol traps mutagenic electrophiles such as NO(X) and complements alpha-tocopherol: physiological implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:3217–3222. [PubMed] 19. Hogg N, Darley-Usmar VM, Wilson MT, Moncada S. The oxidation of alpha-tocopherol in human low-density lipoprotein by the simultaneous generation of superoxide and nitric oxide. FEBS Lett. 1993;326:199–203. [PubMed] 20. Pfeiffer S, Mayer B. Lack of tyrosine nitration by peroxynitrite generated at physiological pH. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:27280–27285. [PubMed] 21. Klebanoff, S.J., and Clark, R.A. 1978. The neutrophil: function and clinical disorders. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press. Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 447–451. 22. Agner, K. 1972. Structure and function of oxidation-reduction enzymes. A. Akeson and A. Ehrenberg, editors. Pergamon Press. Tarrytown, NY. 329–335. 23. Harrison JE, Schultz J. Studies on the chlorinating activity of myeloperoxidase. J Biol Chem. 1976;251:1371–1374. [PubMed] 24. Hazen SL, Hsu FF, Mueller DM, Crowley JR, Heinecke JW. Human neutrophils employ chlorine gas as an oxidant during phagocytosis. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:1283–1289. [PubMed] 25. van der Vleit A, Eiserich JP, Halliwell B, Cross CE. Formation of reactive nitrogen species during peroxidase-catalyzed oxidation of nitrite. A potential additional mechanism of nitric oxide-dependent toxicity. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:7617–7625. [PubMed] 26. Eiserich JP, et al. Formation of nitric oxide-derived inflammatory oxidants by myeloperoxidase in neutrophils. Nature. 1998;391:393–397. [PubMed] 27. Krinsky NI. Singlet excited oxygen as a mediator of the antibacterial action of leukocytes. Science. 1974;186:363–365. [PubMed] 28. Daugherty A, Dunn JL, Rateri DL, Heinecke JW. Myeloperoxidase, a catalyst for lipoprotein oxidation, is expressed in human atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:437–444. [PubMed] 29. Hazen SL, Heinecke JW. 3-Chlorotyrosine, a specific marker of myeloperoxidase-catalyzed oxidation, is markedly elevated in low density lipoprotein isolated from human atherosclerotic intima. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2075–2081. [PubMed] 30. Weiss SJ, Klein R, Slivka A, Wei M. Chlorination of taurine by human neutrophils. Evidence for hypochlorous acid generation. J Clin Invest. 1982;70:598–607. [PubMed] 31. Hazell LJ, et al. Presence of hypochlorite-modified proteins in human atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1535–1544. [PubMed] 32. Klebanoff SJ. Reactive nitrogen intermediates and antimicrobial activity: role of nitrite. Free Radic Biol Med. 1993;14:351–360. [PubMed] 33. Eiserich JP, Cross CE, Jones AD, Halliwell B, van der Vleit A. Formation of nitrating and chlorinating species by reaction of nitrite with hypochlorous acid: a novel mechanism for nitric oxide-mediated protein modification. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:19199–19208. [PubMed] 34. Sampson JB, Ye Y, Rosen H, Beckman JS. Myeloperoxidase and horseradish peroxidase catalyze tyrosine nitration in proteins from nitrite and hydrogen peroxide. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;356:207–213. [PubMed] 35. Farrell AJ, Blake DR, Palmer RM, Moncada S. Increased concentrations of nitrite in synovial fluid and serum samples suggest increased nitric oxide synthesis in rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51:1219–1222. [PubMed] 36. Torre D, et al. Serum concentrations of nitrite in patients with HIV-1 infection. J Clin Pathol. 1996;49:574–576. [PubMed] 37. Gaston B, et al. Endogenous nitrogen oxides and bronchodilator S-nitrosothiols in human airways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:10957–10961. [PubMed] 38. Jiang Q, Hurst JK. Relative chlorinating, nitrating and oxidizing capabilities of neutrophil determined with phagocytosable probes. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:32767–32772. [PubMed] 39. Markwell MA, Haas SM, Bieber LL, Tolbert NE. A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Anal Biochem. 1978;87:206–210. [PubMed] 40. Nelson DP, Kiesow LA. Enthalpy of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by catalase at 25 degrees C (with molar extinction coefficients of H2O2 solutions in the UV). Anal Biochem. 1972;49:474–478. [PubMed] 41. Goldstein JL, Ho YK, Basu SK, Brown MS. Binding site on macrophages that mediates uptake and degradation of acetylated low density lipoprotein, producing massive cholesterol deposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:333–337. [PubMed] 42. Hoppe G, O’Neil J, Hoff HF. Inactivation of lysosomal proteases by oxidized low density lipoprotein is partially responsible for its poor degradation by mouse peritoneal macrophages. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:1506–1512. [PubMed] 43. Suarna C, Dean RT, May J, Stocker R. Human atherosclerotic plaque contains both oxidized lipids and relatively large amounts of alpha-tocopherol and ascorbate. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1616–1624. [PubMed] 44. Rakita RM, Michel BR, Rosen H. Differential inactivation of Escherichia coli membrane dehydrogenases by a myeloperoxidase-mediated antimicrobial system. Biochemistry. 1990;29:1075–1080. [PubMed] 45. Wever R, Plat H, Hamers MN. Human eosinophil peroxidase: a novel isolation procedure, spectral properties and chlorinating activity. FEBS Lett. 1981;123:327–331. [PubMed] 46. van Dalen CJ, Whitehouse MW, Winterbourn CC, Kettle AJ. Thiocyanate and chloride as competing substrates for myeloperoxidase. Biochem J. 1997;327:487–492. [PubMed] 47. Hatch FT. Practical methods for plasma lipoprotein analysis. Adv Lipid Res. 1968;6:1–68. [PubMed] 48. Czerniecki BJ, et al. Calcium ionophore-treated peripheral blood monocytes and dendritic cells rapidly display characteristics of activated dendritic cells. J Immunol. 1997;159:3823–3837. [PubMed] 49. Savenkova ML, Mueller DM, Heinecke JW. Tyrosyl radical generated by myeloperoxidase is a physiological catalyst for the initiation of lipid peroxidation in low density lipoprotein. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:20394–20400. [PubMed] 50. el-Saadani M, et al. A spectrophotometric assay for lipid peroxides in serum lipoproteins using a commercially available reagent. J Lipid Res. 1989;30:627–630. [PubMed] 51. Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979;95:351–358. [PubMed] 52. Hazen SL, Hsu FF, Gaut JP, Crowley JR, Heinecke JW. Modification of proteins and lipids by myeloperoxidase-derived oxidants. Methods Enzymol. 1999;300:88–105. [PubMed] 53. Crowley JR, Yarasheski K, Leeuwenburgh C, Turk J, Heinecke JW. Isotope dilution mass spectrometric quantification of 3-nitrotyrosine in proteins and tissues is facilitated by reduction to 3-aminotyrosine. Anal Biochem. 1998;259:127–135. [PubMed] 54. Hazell LJ, Stocker R. Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein with hypochlorite causes transformation of the lipoprotein into a high-uptake form for macrophages. Biochem J. 1993;290:165–172. [PubMed] 55. Chen SH, et al. The complete cDNA and amino acid sequence of human apolipoprotein B-100. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:12918–12921. [PubMed] 56. Ashkenas J, et al. Structures and high and low affinity ligand binding properties of murine type I and type II macrophage scavenger receptors. J Lipid Res. 1993;34:983–1000. [PubMed] 57. Hazell LJ, van den Berg JJ, Stocker R. Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein by hypochlorite causes aggregation that is mediated by modification of lysine residues rather than lipid oxidation. Biochem J. 1994;302:297–304. [PubMed] 58. Panasenko OM, Briviba K, Klotz LO, Sies H. Oxidative modification and nitration of human low-density lipoproteins by the reaction of hypochlorous acid with nitrite. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997;343:254–259. [PubMed] 59. Pryor WA, Lightsey JW. Mechanisms of nitrogen dioxide reactions: initiation of lipid peroxidation and the production of nitrous acid. Science. 1981;214:435–437. 60. Thomas HV, Mueller PK, Lyman RL. Lipoperoxidation of lung lipids in rats exposed to nitrogen dioxide. Science. 1968;159:532–534. [PubMed] 61. Steinbrecher UP, Witztum JL, Parthasarathy S, Steinberg D. Decrease in reactive amino groups during oxidation or endothelial cell modification of LDL. Correlation with changes in receptor-mediated catabolism. Arteriosclerosis. 1987;7:135–143. [PubMed] 62. Haberland ME, Olch CL, Folgelman AM. Role of lysines in mediating interaction of modified low density lipoproteins with the scavenger receptor of human monocyte macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:11305–11311. [PubMed] 63. Khoo JC, Miller E, McLoughlin P, Steinberg D. Enhanced macrophage uptake of low density lipoprotein after self-aggregation. Arteriosclerosis. 1988;8:348–358. [PubMed] 64. Suits AG, Chait A, Aviram M, Heinecke JW. Phagocytosis of aggregated lipoprotein by macrophages: low density lipoprotein receptor–dependent foam-cell formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:2713–2717. [PubMed] 65. Schissel SL, et al. Rabbit aorta and human atherosclerotic lesions hydrolyze sphingomyelin of retained low-density lipoprotein: proposed role for arterial-wall sphingomyelinase in subendothelial retention and aggregation of atherogenic lipoproteins. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:1455–1464. [PubMed] 66. Hoff HF, Whitaker TE, O’Neil J. Oxidation of low density lipoprotein leads to particle aggregation and altered macrophage recognition. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:602–609. [PubMed] 67. Kikugawa K, Beppu M, Okamoto Y. Uptake by macrophages of low-density lipoprotein damaged by nitrogen dioxide in air. Lipids. 1995;30:313–320. [PubMed] 68. Chang GJ, et al. Oxidation of LDL to a biologically active form by derivatives of nitric oxide and nitrite in the absence of superoxide. Dependence on pH and oxygen. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:1808–1814. [PubMed] 69. Cy Y, et al. Selective modification of apo B-100 in the oxidation of low density lipoproteins by myeloperoxidase in vitro. J Lipid Res. 1999;40:686–698. [PubMed] 70. Leeuwenburgh C, et al. Mass spectrometric quantification of markers for protein oxidation by tyrosyl radical, copper, and hydroxyl radical in low density lipoprotein isolated from human atherosclerotic plaques. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:3520–3526. [PubMed] 71. Folcik VA, Aristy-Nivar RA, Krajewski LP, Cathcart MK. Lipoxygenase contributes to the oxidation of lipids in human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:504–510. [PubMed] 72. Kettle AJ. Neutrophils convert tyrosyl residues in albumin to chlorotyrosine. FEBS Lett. 1996;379:103–106. [PubMed] 73. Hazen SL, Crowley JR, Mueller DM, Heinecke JW. Mass spectrometric quantification of 3-chlorotyrosine in human tissues with attomole sensitivity: a sensitive and specific marker for myeloperoxidase-catalyzed chlorination at sites of inflammation. Free Radic Biol Med. 1997;23:909–916. [PubMed] 74. Weiss SJ, Lampert MB, Test ST. Long-lived oxidants generated by human neutrophils: characterization and bioactivity. Science. 1983;222:625–628. [PubMed] 75. Nathan CF. Neutrophil activation on biological surfaces. Massive secretion of hydrogen peroxide in response to products of macrophages and lymphocytes. J Clin Invest. 1987;80:1550–1560. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J Clin Invest. 1991 Dec; 88(6):1785-92.
[J Clin Invest. 1991]Circulation. 1997 Feb 18; 95(4):1062-71.
[Circulation. 1997]Atherosclerosis. 1998 Nov; 141(1):1-15.
[Atherosclerosis. 1998]N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30; 329(27):2002-12.
[N Engl J Med. 1993]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Oct 13; 1180(1):73-82.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992]Methods Enzymol. 1994; 233():229-40.
[Methods Enzymol. 1994]Methods Enzymol. 1996; 269():175-84.
[Methods Enzymol. 1996]FEBS Lett. 1997 Jul 14; 411(2-3):157-60.
[FEBS Lett. 1997]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Feb; 87(4):1620-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990]Methods Enzymol. 1994; 233():229-40.
[Methods Enzymol. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 1; 94(7):3217-22.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]FEBS Lett. 1993 Jul 12; 326(1-3):199-203.
[FEBS Lett. 1993]Arch Biochem Biophys. 1991 Aug 1; 288(2):481-7.
[Arch Biochem Biophys. 1991]Science. 1974 Oct 25; 186(4161):363-5.
[Science. 1974]J Clin Invest. 1994 Jul; 94(1):437-44.
[J Clin Invest. 1994]J Biol Chem. 1976 Mar 10; 251(5):1371-4.
[J Biol Chem. 1976]J Clin Invest. 1997 May 1; 99(9):2075-81.
[J Clin Invest. 1997]J Clin Invest. 1982 Sep; 70(3):598-607.
[J Clin Invest. 1982]Free Radic Biol Med. 1993 Apr; 14(4):351-60.
[Free Radic Biol Med. 1993]J Biol Chem. 1997 Mar 21; 272(12):7617-25.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Nature. 1998 Jan 22; 391(6665):393-7.
[Nature. 1998]J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 9; 271(32):19199-208.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998 Aug 15; 356(2):207-13.
[Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998]Methods Enzymol. 1994; 233():229-40.
[Methods Enzymol. 1994]J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 17; 272(3):1433-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Anal Biochem. 1978 Jun 15; 87(1):206-10.
[Anal Biochem. 1978]J Biol Chem. 1997 Mar 21; 272(12):7617-25.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Anal Biochem. 1972 Oct; 49(2):474-8.
[Anal Biochem. 1972]Biochemistry. 1990 Jan 30; 29(4):1075-80.
[Biochemistry. 1990]FEBS Lett. 1981 Jan 26; 123(2):327-31.
[FEBS Lett. 1981]Biochem J. 1997 Oct 15; 327 ( Pt 2)():487-92.
[Biochem J. 1997]Adv Lipid Res. 1968; 6():1-68.
[Adv Lipid Res. 1968]J Immunol. 1997 Oct 15; 159(8):3823-37.
[J Immunol. 1997]J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 12; 269(32):20394-400.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]J Lipid Res. 1989 Apr; 30(4):627-30.
[J Lipid Res. 1989]Anal Biochem. 1979 Jun; 95(2):351-8.
[Anal Biochem. 1979]Methods Enzymol. 1999; 300():88-105.
[Methods Enzymol. 1999]Anal Biochem. 1998 May 15; 259(1):127-35.
[Anal Biochem. 1998]J Clin Invest. 1996 Sep 15; 98(6):1283-9.
[J Clin Invest. 1996]Biochem J. 1993 Feb 15; 290 ( Pt 1)():165-72.
[Biochem J. 1993]J Biol Chem. 1986 Oct 5; 261(28):12918-21.
[J Biol Chem. 1986]J Clin Invest. 1994 Oct; 94(4):1506-12.
[J Clin Invest. 1994]J Lipid Res. 1993 Jun; 34(6):983-1000.
[J Lipid Res. 1993]J Immunol. 1997 Oct 15; 159(8):3823-37.
[J Immunol. 1997]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan; 76(1):333-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979]J Clin Invest. 1994 Oct; 94(4):1506-12.
[J Clin Invest. 1994]Biochem J. 1993 Feb 15; 290 ( Pt 1)():165-72.
[Biochem J. 1993]Biochem J. 1994 Aug 15; 302 ( Pt 1)():297-304.
[Biochem J. 1994]Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997 Jul 15; 343(2):254-9.
[Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997]J Biol Chem. 1997 Mar 21; 272(12):7617-25.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 9; 271(32):19199-208.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1997 Mar 21; 272(12):7617-25.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Ann Rheum Dis. 1992 Nov; 51(11):1219-22.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 1; 90(23):10957-61.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]J Clin Invest. 1997 May 1; 99(9):2075-81.
[J Clin Invest. 1997]J Clin Invest. 1996 Mar 15; 97(6):1535-44.
[J Clin Invest. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1997 Mar 21; 272(12):7617-25.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Nature. 1998 Jan 22; 391(6665):393-7.
[Nature. 1998]Science. 1968 Feb 2; 159(814):532-4.
[Science. 1968]Arteriosclerosis. 1987 Mar-Apr; 7(2):135-43.
[Arteriosclerosis. 1987]J Biol Chem. 1984 Sep 25; 259(18):11305-11.
[J Biol Chem. 1984]Arteriosclerosis. 1988 Jul-Aug; 8(4):348-58.
[Arteriosclerosis. 1988]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr; 86(8):2713-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989]Biochem J. 1993 Feb 15; 290 ( Pt 1)():165-72.
[Biochem J. 1993]Biochem J. 1994 Aug 15; 302 ( Pt 1)():297-304.
[Biochem J. 1994]J Clin Invest. 1996 Sep 15; 98(6):1455-64.
[J Clin Invest. 1996]J Lipid Res. 1993 Jun; 34(6):983-1000.
[J Lipid Res. 1993]J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 17; 272(3):1433-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Oct 13; 1180(1):73-82.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992]FEBS Lett. 1993 Sep 13; 330(2):181-5.
[FEBS Lett. 1993]Lipids. 1995 Apr; 30(4):313-20.
[Lipids. 1995]Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997 Jul 15; 343(2):254-9.
[Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997]Arterioscler Thromb. 1994 Nov; 14(11):1808-14.
[Arterioscler Thromb. 1994]Arteriosclerosis. 1988 Jul-Aug; 8(4):348-58.
[Arteriosclerosis. 1988]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr; 86(8):2713-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989]Biochem J. 1994 Aug 15; 302 ( Pt 1)():297-304.
[Biochem J. 1994]Biochem J. 1993 Feb 15; 290 ( Pt 1)():165-72.
[Biochem J. 1993]J Lipid Res. 1999 Apr; 40(4):686-98.
[J Lipid Res. 1999]J Clin Invest. 1996 Sep 15; 98(6):1283-9.
[J Clin Invest. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1997 Mar 21; 272(12):7617-25.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Nature. 1998 Jan 22; 391(6665):393-7.
[Nature. 1998]J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 9; 271(32):19199-208.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]J Clin Invest. 1982 Sep; 70(3):598-607.
[J Clin Invest. 1982]Arteriosclerosis. 1987 Mar-Apr; 7(2):135-43.
[Arteriosclerosis. 1987]J Biol Chem. 1984 Sep 25; 259(18):11305-11.
[J Biol Chem. 1984]J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 17; 272(3):1433-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]J Biol Chem. 1997 Feb 7; 272(6):3520-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995 Oct; 15(10):1616-24.
[Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995]J Clin Invest. 1995 Jul; 96(1):504-10.
[J Clin Invest. 1995]J Clin Invest. 1994 Jul; 94(1):437-44.
[J Clin Invest. 1994]