![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2004 Lin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. Fundulus heteroclitus gonadotropins.5: Small scale chromatographic fractionation of pituitary extracts into components with different steroidogenic activities using homologous bioassays 1Barry University, School of Natural & Health Sciences, Miami Shores, Florida 33161, USA 2Whitney Laboratory, University of Florida, St. Augustine, Florida 32086, USA Corresponding author.Yu-Wai Peter Lin: plin/at/mail.barry.edu; Teresa R Petrino: plin/at/mail.barry.edu; Robin A Wallace: robin/at/rafa.com Received January 9, 2004; Accepted March 24, 2004. Abstract Fractionation and characterization of gonadotropins (GtH) from Fundulus heteroclitus pituitary extracts were carried out using a biocompatible liquid chromatographic procedure (Pharmacia FPLC system). Chromatographic fractions were monitored for gonadotropic activities (induction of oocyte maturation and steroid production) using homologous follicle bioassays in vitro. Size-exclusion chromatography eluted gonadotropic activity in one major protein peak (Mr ~ 30,000). Anion-exchange and hydrophobic-interaction chromatography (HIC) yielded two distinct peaks of 17beta-estradiol (E2)- and 17alpha-hydroxy,20beta-dihydroprogesterone (DHP)-promoting activity with associated oocyte maturation. Two-dimensional chromatography (chromatofocusing followed by HIC) resolved pituitary extracts into two active fractions; both induced E2 synthesis, but one was relatively poor in eliciting DHP and testosterone production. Thus, using homologous bioassays, at least two quantitatively different gonadotropic (steroidogenic) activities: an E2-promoting gonadotropin (GtH I-like) and a DHP-promoting gonadotropin (GtH II-like), which has a lower isoelectric point but greater hydrophobicity than the former, can be distinguished from F. heteroclitus pituitaries by a variety of chromatographic procedures. This study complements previous biochemical and molecular data in F. heteroclitus and substantiates the duality of GtH function in a multiple-spawning teleost. Background During a breeding season, many fish known as fractional spawners have been found to undergo periodic reproductive activity correlated with the lunar cycle [1], including Fundulus heteroclitus (killifish) [2,3]. Such activity involves a complicated interplay of gonadotropic hormones (GtHs) and ovarian steroidogenic events as clutches of oocytes are periodically recruited into vitellogenic, maturational, and ovulatory processes [3,4]. The presence of two distinct GtHs in teleosts has been demonstrated in several species including chum salmon [5,6], coho salmon [7], killifish [8-10], common carp [11], Atlantic croaker [12], tuna [13], bonito [14], red seabream [15], striped bass [16], yellowfin porgy [17], goldfish [18]and Japanese eel [19]. These GtHs, distinguished by their β-subunits and termed GtH I and GtH II, are similar (38–48% sequence identity) to tetrapod follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), respectively [20,21]. The biological significance of the two GtHs has been intensively studied in salmonids and other annual spawners. However, much less information is available from other commercially important species that are fractional spawners such as tuna, flounder, red drum, croaker, and halibut. Due to habitat destruction and/or overfishing, the populations of some of these species are declining. Fundulus is also a fractional spawner and can act as an inexpensive, easily manipulated model system. In order to understand the operant mechanisms involved in cyclic teleost reproduction and to provide a broader basis for comparative study of the teleost GtHs, we have focused our studies on the F. heteroclitus GtHs and their role in controlling the cyclic reproductive activity characteristic of this species and common to a large class of commercially important species other than salmonids. These efforts have included the development of a homologous bioassay for gonadotropic hormones using oocyte maturation and steroid production by isolated ovarian follicles [22], the characterization of steroidogenic responses to an F. heteroclitus pituitary extract (FPE) by the ovarian follicle [23-26]; specifically, the identification of 17α-hydroxy,20β-dihydroprogesterone (DHP) as the maturation-inducing substance (MIS) for F. heteroclitus upon stimulation by gonadotropin [27], and the cloning and sequencing of the two β-subunits of the GtHs from a cDNA library [8]. The α-subunit, shared by the two GtHs and thyrotropin hormone (TSH), has also been sequenced from the same cDNA library [28]. More recently, we reported the preparation and use of specific antibodies to the two β-subunits of F. heteroclitus GtHs [9]. Each antibody recognizes a different subset of pituitary cells in the central (GtH I) and peripheral (GtH II) proximal pars distalis, respectively, regions that display the typical tinctorial properties of gonadotrops. Similarly, Shimizu and Yamashita [10] also reported the preparation of antibodies against the α-subunit and the two β-subunits, and the purification of F. heteroclitus GtHs using an immunochemical assay. Thus, the molecular and immunochemical data available for F. heteroclitus show the presence of two distinct GtHs; however, a detailed analysis on the duality of GtH function is still lacking in this and other fractional spawners. To further investigate the possible differential biological activities of the two distinct GtHs in F. heteroclitus may require the use of specific homologous bioassays. The intention of the present study was to discern any discrete differences in terms of maturational and steroidogenic activities of the two gonadotropins (GtH I and GtH II) shown to be present in F. heteroclitus. To accomplish this objective, we carried out the purification and characterization of GtH activities from Fundulus pituitary by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) as determined by homologous bioassays. Materials and methods Animals and chemicals Animals were collected from salt marshes in the Matanzas River, St. Augustine, Florida. Routine husbandry procedures were used to maintain the fish in the laboratory: captured fish (average weight = 7 g) were kept in a temperature-regulated (25°C) running sea water aquarium with a controlled photoperiod (14L:10D) and were fed with an enriched diet (mixture of boiled chicken eggs and dry flake food). Under this regimen, the laboratory-maintained fish had responsive ovarian follicles and active pituitaries throughout the year [29]. In effect, the ovarian follicles retrieved from these fish were responsive to pituitary extract stimulation, and underwent oocyte maturation normally in vitro. In addition, the pituitary glands from these laboratory fish also retained high gonadotropic potencies even outside of the normal breeding season. The care and use of, as well as all procedures involving, animals have been approved by Barry University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), in accordance with the guidelines of the IACUC of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Absolute grade (NH4)2SO4 was obtained from Research Plus, Inc. All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma unless specified otherwise. Preparation of Fundulus pituitary extract (FPE) Pituitaries from sexually mature fish {gonadosomatic index (GSI) = gonad weight ÷ eviscerated body weight × 100; GSI = ~10% for female and ~5% for male} were isolated immediately after decapitating the animals and stored frozen at -80°C (for up to one year) before the extraction procedure. The pituitary glands were collected from animals used in this and other studies in the laboratory over a period of three years. The pituitaries (0.2 mg wet wt per gland; 40 to 500 glands) were homogenized with a Teflon-coated pestle at 4°C in the starting buffer used for each chromatographic run. Homogenates were then centrifuged (13,000 g) for 1 h at 4°C and the supernatants were collected. The pellets were extracted once more with the starting buffer and recentrifuged. Supernatants from both extracts were combined to provide FPE and filtered through a 0.2-μm Nylon centrifugal microfilter (Centrex, Schleicher & Schuell) before injection onto chromatographic columns. Pituitaries from both male and female fish were used. Due to a report of sexual differences in GtH [30], pituitaries from both sexes were not mixed. However, numerous experiments in our lab indicated that similar chromatograms are obtained from pituitary extracts of either sex (data not shown), so an indication of sex for the sample source is not provided. Chromatography Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) was carried out using two columns (Pharmacia Superose 12 HR 10/30 and Superose 6 HR 10/30) connected in series on a Pharmacia FPLC system equipped with absorbance monitors at 214 and 280 nm (HR 10 flow cells). The columns were equilibrated with 50 mM NH4HCO3, pH 7.5, before the application of FPE. The same buffer was used to elute the sample isocratically with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. One-ml fractions were collected and evaporated to dryness by vacuum centrifugation (Savant SpeedVac Concentrator). For anion-exchange chromatography (AEC), the column (Pharmacia Mono Q HR 5/5) was initially equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5). FPE was applied to the column and unadsorbed proteins were allowed to percolate through the column using the same starting buffer. Elution of the adsorbed sample was then carried out with a linear, increasing gradient of NaCl (0 – 0.33 M) in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. The flow rate was 1.0 ml/min, the fraction size was 2.0 ml/tube, and eluted fractions were dialyzed overnight at 4°C against distilled water. The starting buffer for hydrophobic-interaction chromatography (HIC) was 1.2 M (NH4)2SO4 in 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 6.8. The hydrophobic-interaction column (Bio-Rad Bio-Gel TSK Phenyl-5-PW, 7.5 × 75 mm) was equilibrated with starting buffer before the application of FPE and a linear gradient of decreasing (NH4)2SO4 concentration was begun after the unadsorbed protein eluted from the column. Eluted fractions of 1.0 ml were collected at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min and dialyzed against distilled water. For chromatofocusing, the column (Pharmacia Mono P HR 5/20) was initially equilibrated with 25 mM Bis-Tris-HCl, pH 6.3. After application of FPE, elution was carried out with 40 ml 10% Polybuffer 74 (Pharmacia), pH 4.0, and this was followed by a 1.0-M NaCl wash to elute the remaining adsorbed protein. Fractions of 2.0 ml were collected at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Eluted fractions were pooled into five samples (I-V) and each sample was adjusted to 1.2 M (NH4)2SO4 and rechromatographed on the hydrophobic-interaction column. Eluted fractions were dialyzed against distilled water. All dialyzed samples were evaporated to dryness by vacuum centrifugation, tightly sealed, and stored at 4°C for up to a month prior to reconstitution. Bioassays Dried fractions were reconstituted with 75% L-15 and measured for gonadotropic activities by RIA determinations of the amounts of 17α-hydroxy,20β-dihydroprogesterone (DHP), testosterone (T), and 17β-estradiol (E2) generated after follicle culture at 25°C for 24 h and by scoring cultured follicles for oocyte maturation [germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD)] after 48 hr as previously described [22]. For each bioassay, prematurational ovarian follicles (1.2 – 1.4 mm in diameter) were pooled from 10 to 20 animals. Results Each of the following chromatographic procedures has been performed at least ten times. Representative chromatographs are illustrated in the following results. Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) SEC yielded several adsorbance peaks that were not well separated from each other (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A
Anion-exchange chromatography (AEC) AEC of FPE provided a complex elution profile (Fig. (Fig.2A).2A
Hydrophobic-interaction chromatography (HIC) HIC of FPE also yielded numerous UV-adsorbing components (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A
Chromatofocusing Chromatofocusing of FPE with a decreasing pH gradient gave a complex but reproducible elution profile of 280-nm adsorbing material followed by a major protein peak eluted with the high salt wash (Fig. (Fig.4).4
Discussion GtH bioassay Fundulus pituitary extract (FPE) was fractionated by various biocompatible liquid chromatographic procedures in an attempt to purify the GtHs and characterize their biological activities. Chromatographic fractions were tested for their gonadotropic activities by using a homologous bioassay system which utilized intact F. heteroclitus ovarian follicles in vitro [22]. Two indicators of gonadotropic activity were employed, one being the ability of the fractions to stimulate prematurational oocytes (1.2–1.4 mm in diameter), which are arrested at prophase I of meiosis, to resume the meiotic process by undergoing GVBD. The other indication of gonadotropic activity was the ability of the eluted fractions to stimulate the ovarian follicles to produce three reproductively important steroid hormones (DHP, T, and E2). This homologous bioassay system has been extensively verified and shown to be sensitive and specific for F. heteroclitus GtHs [22]. It thus avoided pitfalls that may have arisen using a heterologous bioassay system [31]. Although a report has appeared that prolactin and growth hormone stimulate ovarian steroidogenesis when injected into F. heteroclitus [32], no biological activity was detected for either hormone using our in vitro bioassay system (data not shown). Another advantage of our homologous bioassay system was that many fractions could be assayed simultaneously with a large number of appropriate-sized follicles that can be pooled from several fish and randomized, thus eliminating most of the between-animal variation in the procedure. To further minimize the inherent variation in the responsiveness of ovarian follicles to gonadotropin and to assure the availability of large numbers of sensitive follicles and active pituitary glands throughout the year, we also developed a routine husbandry procedure to maintain a large population of reproductively healthy F. heteroclitus in the laboratory [29]. With this husbandry procedure, we were able to proceed with the FPE fractionation and to carry out homologous bioassays throughout the year. Chromatographic resolution of gonadotropic activity Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) produced several UV-absorbing peaks, none of which correlated precisely with biological activity found around 30 kDa (Fig. (Fig.1).1 After anion-exchange chromatography (AEC) (Fig. (Fig.2A),2A Gonadotropic fractions relatively rich in either E2- or DHP-promoting activity were also discerned either by hydrophobic-interaction (HIC) (eluting at -0.31 and -0.17 M (NH4)2SO4, respectively; Fig. Fig.3C)3C Based on previous reports that employed similar procedures, it would appear that the gonadotropic activity purified by Swanson et al. [33] from coho salmon pituitaries primarily corresponds to those fractions described here that lack preferential steroidogenic activity (i.e., Table 1, fractions I-1 and II-8), while the gonadotropin described by Copeland and Thomas [34] for Atlantic croaker is similar to our DHP-promoting gonadotropin (Table 1, fraction V-19). None of the fractions we have analyzed from any single chromatographic run have yielded single, silver-stained bands at the expected size on electrophoretic gels (data not shown). This may indicate that the amount of GtH protein present in the chromatographic fractions was below the detection level (<5 ng) of silver staining [47]. On the other hand, the homologous oocyte maturation and steroid production assays used in this study are far more sensitive in discerning biological activities. A series of articles have attested to the duality of the GtHs in teleosts [7-10,12,19,48]. These studies provided ample biochemical and immunological evidence that there are two chemically distinct GtHs that reside in separate pituitary gonadotrops and have different ontogenies. Unfortunately, attempts to distinguish different steroidogenic activities between GtH I and GtH II have been less definitive because biological activities of GtHs overlap considerably. Although GtH II seems to be more potent than GtH I in stimulating DHP-production by salmon ovarian follicles, no significant difference in E2-steroidogenic activity has been found between GtH I and GtH II [7,48-50]. As a corollary, therefore, GtH I appear to preferentially promote E2-production in salmonids. Since E2 and DHP are primarily involved in vitellogenic processes and the resumption of meiotic maturation, respectively, GtH I and GtH II would seem to correspond to the vitellogenesis-promoting "carbohydrate-poor" and maturation-promoting "carbohydrate-rich" GtHs described by Idler and his colleagues for salmon and flounder [51-54]. Based on this, our own results for F. heteroclitus appear to indicate that GtH I-like and GtH II-like activities reside in fractions III-10 and V-19, respectively, derived from chromatofocusing of FPE (Table 1). Similar activities were found in fractions obtained by AEC (Fig. (Fig.2C)2C The chromatographic separation of the GtHs evaluated by bioassay cannot directly discern which fraction is GtH I and GtH II, and even though there is an overlap in the steroidogenic activity, the homologous bioassay data clearly distinguish two well defined peaks of different biological activities. Additionally, our HIC profiles as determined by the specific biological activities (oocyte maturation and steroidogenesis) are in agreement with those reported by Shimizu and Yamashita [10] who identified the F. heteroclitus GtH I and GtH II using an immunochemical analysis. We conclude, therefore, that at least two gonadotropic activities are present in F. heteroclitus pituitaries: an E2-promoting gonadotropin (GtH I-like) and a DHP-promoting gonadotropin (GtH II-like) which has a lower isoelectric point but greater hydrophobicity than the former. Consistent with our previous findings that DHP is the maturation-inducing steroid in F. heteroclitus [27] the DHP-promoting gonadotropin is also associated with high maturation-inducing activity (Fig. (Fig.3).3 Conclusions Using homologous bioassay, at least two quantitatively different gonadotropic (steroidogenic) activities: an E2-promoting gonadotropin (GtH I-like) and a DHP-promoting gonadotropin (GtH II-like), which has a lower isoelectric point but greater hydrophobicity than the former, can be distinguished from F. heteroclitus pituitaries by a variety of chromatographic procedures. This study complements previous biochemical and molecular data in F. heteroclitus and substantiates the duality of GtH function in a multiple spawner. Acknowledgments This study was supported by NSF grant No. DCB-8819005 awarded to RAW, by NSF grant No. DBI-011608 awarded to TRP, and by NIH-MBRS SCORE Grant GM45455-08 awarded to Y-WPL. The authors wish to thank Lynn Milstead (Whitney Lab) and Linda Cahill (Barry CELT) for their assistance with the figures and Scott van Arnam for the collection of animals. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987 Apr; 66(1):71-8.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988 Aug; 71(2):292-301.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988 Aug; 71(2):302-6.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988]Biol Reprod. 1991 Jan; 44(1):29-38.
[Biol Reprod. 1991]Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1992 May; 85(1-2):127-39.
[Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1992]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002 Jan; 125(1):79-91.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987 Jul; 67(1):126-41.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1989 Jan; 73(1):147-56.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1989]J Exp Zool. 1992 Sep 1; 263(3):254-64.
[J Exp Zool. 1992]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1993 Oct; 92(1):1-15.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1993]Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1992 May; 85(1-2):127-39.
[Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1992]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987 Jul; 67(1):126-41.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987 Jul; 67(1):126-41.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987 Jul; 67(1):126-41.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988 Oct; 72(1):144-53.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988 Aug; 71(2):292-301.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988]Biol Reprod. 1991 Jan; 44(1):29-38.
[Biol Reprod. 1991]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987 Feb; 65(2):269-87.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1978 Apr; 34(4):408-20.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1978]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002 Jan; 125(1):79-91.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002]Endocrinology. 1969 Sep; 85(3):618-22.
[Endocrinology. 1969]J Endocrinol. 1986 Sep; 110(3):539-49.
[J Endocrinol. 1986]Endocrinology. 1971 Apr; 88(4):1029-44.
[Endocrinology. 1971]J Endocrinol. 1985 Jun; 105(3):405-13.
[J Endocrinol. 1985]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987 Feb; 65(2):269-87.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1989 Mar; 73(3):425-41.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1989]Anal Biochem. 1979 Sep 15; 98(1):231-7.
[Anal Biochem. 1979]Biol Reprod. 1991 Jan; 44(1):29-38.
[Biol Reprod. 1991]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002 Jan; 125(1):79-91.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1993 Aug; 91(2):115-25.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1993]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999 Apr; 114(1):121-31.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988 Sep; 71(3):452-8.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002 Jan; 125(1):79-91.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1993 Oct; 92(1):1-15.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1993]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2001 Aug; 123(2):203-9.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2001]