![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology Legionella pneumophila Replication Vacuole Formation Involves Rapid Recruitment of Proteins of the Early Secretory System Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology and,1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 021112 *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111. Phone: (617) 636-3993. Fax: (617) 636-0337. E-mail: ralph.isberg/at/tufts.edu. Received December 11, 2003; Revised January 7, 2004; Accepted January 19, 2004. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Legionella pneumophila vacuole biogenesis was analyzed by using a cell-free system. We show that calnexin, Sec22b, and Rab1 are recruited to the vacuole very shortly after bacterial uptake, and we have identified Rab1 as a potential host factor involved in the endoplasmic reticulum recruitment process. Legionella pneumophila, the causative agent of Legionnaires' disease, is an intracellular gram-negative pathogen (4). In environmental reservoirs, the bacterium is found associated with freshwater amoeba, while human disease is associated with inhalation of contaminated aerosols followed by multiplication within alveolar macrophages (16, 25). The Dot/Icm complex, a type IV secretion apparatus, is essential for intracellular growth and for translocation of bacterial effector molecules into host cells, which promote uptake and allow the establishment of the replication vacuole (2, 18, 24). Two translocated proteins that are substrates of the Dot/Icm complex have been reported thus far: RalF, a guanidine nucleotide exchange factor that activates Arf family members on the L. pneumophila vacuole (15); and LidA, a protein of unknown function (3). Following uptake into target cells, the bacterium is internalized into a compartment that escapes the endocytic pathway (8, 9). Fifteen minutes after internalization, the vacuolar membrane lacks plasma membrane or endocytic markers and is surrounded by mitochondria and small vesicles (7). Based on the thickness of their membranes these vesicles are thought to be derived from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (22). In addition, L. pneumophila vacuoles intercept vesicular traffic from ER exit sites and vesicle budding from the ER appears to be required for establishment of the replication vacuole (11). Six hours after internalization, ER surrounds the vacuole and the bacterium starts to multiply (21, 22). As replication proceeds, greater than 50% of the L. pneumophila vacuoles acquire markers of endocytic organelles (20) and the host cell is eventually lysed. The kinetics of ER recruitment and the nature of the vesicles recruited to the L. pneumophila vacuole are still unclear. ER markers have been detected around the vacuoles 6 h after infection by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy analysis (21, 22). However, it has not been shown that ER markers are associated with the vacuolar membrane at early stages of vacuolar biogenesis. In this study, we analyzed preparations of isolated L. pneumophila vacuoles to determine how soon after bacterial contact with host cells that ER-derived components are associated with these vacuoles and to identify the host factor(s) involved in this process. A sucrose gradient-based procedure was used to isolate the L. pneumophila vacuoles. A total of 108 differentiated U937 cells were incubated for 10 min or 1 h with either wild-type L. pneumophila or with the avirulent dot/icm mutant (dotA) (1), both expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) (19), at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5 to maximize the yield of vacuoles. As L. pneumophila has maximum potential for promoting intracellular growth after entering the postexponential phase, we used bacteria grown to this density for all the infections described in this study. The infected cells were suspended in 2 ml of homogenization buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.2], 250 mM sucrose, 0.5 mM EGTA) and lysed in a Dounce homogenizer, and the unbroken cells and nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation (3 min, 1,500 rpm). The postnuclear supernatant (PNS) was loaded onto a discontinuous sucrose gradient (Beckman centrifuge tubes, 14 by 89 mm) consisting of 6 ml of 14% (wt/wt) sucrose layered on top of 2 ml of 50% (wt/wt) sucrose in HEPES buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.2], 0.5 mM EGTA) and subjected to centrifugation at 600 × g for 90 min at 4°C. The L. pneumophila vacuoles were identified in the 14 to 50% interface fraction of the sucrose gradient based on the presence of the GFP marker (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A
Antibodies directed against the Golgi-associated proteins p115 (G. Watters) and GM130 (BD Bioscience) failed to reveal recruitment of Golgi material at any time point after infection (data not shown). In contrast, calnexin (rabbit polyclonal antibody from Stressgen), a membrane ER protein, was detected on the surface of 77% of the vacuoles isolated from macrophages infected with wild-type L. pneumophila as early as 10 min after infection (Fig. (Fig.2A).2A
The rapid accumulation of calnexin about the vacuoles is in apparent contradiction with previous reports indicating that calnexin was only associated with intracellular L. pneumophila 6 h after internalization (11). This discrepancy could be due to the fact that the previous study used murine bone marrow-derived macrophages instead of human macrophages, but we favor the hypothesis that the small amount of calnexin recruited during the earliest times after uptake can only be detected when the vacuoles are isolated from other cellular material. Our results also indicate that ER recruitment continues throughout the first hour of infection, as ER accumulates around the L. pneumophila vacuole during this period of time. Moreover, this process is dependent on the presence of an intact Dot/Icm system, indicating that the effector molecule(s) secreted by this apparatus is responsible for the proper recruitment of ER-derived material. We believe that the recruitment of ER-derived material to the L. pneumophila vacuole differs from the observed ER-mediated phagocytosis previously seen with latex beads (5), since the process described here is Dot/Icm dependent (Fig. (Fig.2).2 Recruitment of ER-associated material to the L. pneumophila vacuole may involve hijacking of host proteins that regulate vesicular traffic between the ER and the Golgi apparatus. The Rabs and the SNAREs are the largest families of proteins known to be involved in membrane trafficking (6, 17). They respectively regulate the traffic of vesicles and participate in their docking and fusion to their target membranes. Two Rab proteins, Rab1a/b and Rab2 (13, 23), and at least one SNARE complex, composed of the v-SNARE Sec22b and three t-SNAREs (syntaxin 5, membrin, and rBet1), have been shown to regulate the ER-to-Golgi traffic (26). Therefore, we investigated the recruitment of these proteins to the L. pneumophila vacuoles. One hour after infection, 43% of the vacuoles isolated from macrophages infected with wild-type L. pneumophila were positive for the small GTPase Rab1 (rabbit polyclonal antibody from Calbiochem) (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A
As the two Rab1 effectors p115 and GM130 are absent from the vacuole, other factors may be involved in the recruitment of ER-derived material. ER-derived vesicles dock and fuse with the Golgi apparatus by formation of a complex between Sec22b and three t-SNAREs (syntaxin 5, membrin, and rBet1) present on the Golgi target membrane (26). We performed immunofluorescence analysis using antibodies directed against these t-SNARES (the rabbit polyclonal anti-syntaxin 5, antimembrin, and anti-rBet1 antibodies were kind gifts from J. Hay, University of Michigan), but none was found associated with the surface of the vacuole (data not shown). Therefore, if Sec22b plays a role in the formation of the L. pneumophila replication vacuole, it may bind to unidentified t-SNARE or t-SNARE-like proteins encoded by the host or translocated by the bacterium across the vacuolar membrane. Rab proteins are known to cycle between a GTP-bound active form and a GDP-bound inactive form, the latter of which acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor when overexpressed in mammalian cells such as COS1 cells (African green monkey kidney cells, transformed by an origin-defective mutant of simian virus 40). To test for growth in COS1 cells, postexponential-phase L. pneumophila strains were introduced onto monolayers of 105 cells in 24-well dishes at an MOI of 0.05 by centrifugation for 5 min at 1,000 rpm. A low MOI was used to maximize the efficiency of initiation of intracellular growth (3). After incubation for 2 h at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2, the monolayers were washed three times to remove any extracellular bacteria and intracellular growth of L. pneumophila was quantified (1). As shown in Fig. Fig.4A,4A
Our results indicate that Rab1 is required for the optimal intracellular growth of L. pneumophila in COS1 cells. Since Rab1 has an essential role in the docking of ER-derived vesicles with their target membrane, it is possible that Rab1 provides a similar role for L. pneumophila. Rab1 may direct the association of ER-derived vesicles with the L. pneumophila vacuole, thus assisting the formation of an environment permissive for growth. It has been previously reported that the GDP-bound form of Rab1 localizes to the cytoplasm of the cell as well as to punctate structures that are likely to be fragments of ER, ERGIC, and Golgi membranes (14). It is possible that when the inactive form of the Rab1 is overexpressed, ER-derived material rich in GDP-bound Rab1 is recruited to the L. pneumophila vacuole. The irreversible association of inactive Rab1 to the vacuole may interfere with cycles of recruitment of ER and, consequently, with the ability of L. pneumophila to multiply. Functional redundancy of both bacterial proteins and host function may explain why we were unable to obtain a total block of L. pneumophila growth by overexpression of an inactive form of Rab1a. It is believed that the bacterium uses several strategies to hijack elements of the host cell secretory machinery to establish its replication vacuole. The translocated effector substrates of the Dot/Icm system are particularly subject to functional redundancy (3, 15; Z.-Q. Luo and R. Isberg, personal communication). The same argument can be made for the host factors involved in the infection process. It is possible that, in order to establish the replication vacuole, L. pneumophila targets several host factors of redundant function and that inactivation of more than one of them would be necessary to observe a dramatic effect on the intracellular replication of the bacteria. Our results demonstrate the power of using cell-free systems to analyze the maturation of the L. pneumophila replication vacuole. We have shown that the association of ER with the L. pneumophila vacuole is a characteristic of nascent vacuoles rather than a unique property of the replication vacuole and have identified some potential host targets of the effectors of the type IV secretion system. Future studies will emphasize the identification of the bacterial factor(s) that interacts with Rab1 and/or Sec22b in order to ensure proper delivery of ER membrane to the L. pneumophila vacuole. Acknowledgments We thank Molly Bergman, Zhao-Qing Luo, Matthias Machner, Marion Shonn, and Susan Van Rheenen for review of the manuscript. We thank Jesse Hay for the kind gift of anti-Sec22b, anti-syntaxin 5, antimembrin, and anti-rBet1 antibodies; Ellen Tisdale for the kind gift of Rab2 monoclonal antibodies; and William Balch for kindly providing the Rab1a cDNA. R.R.I. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI). I.D. is a Human Frontier Science Program Fellow. This work was supported by the HHMI. Notes Editor: F. C. Fang REFERENCES 1. Berger, K. H., and R. R. Isberg. 1993. Two distinct defects in intracellular growth complemented by a single genetic locus in Legionella pneumophila. Mol. Microbiol. 7:7-19. [PubMed] 2. Christie, P. J., and J. P. Vogel. 2000. Bacterial type IV secretion: conjugation systems adapted to deliver effector molecules to host cells. Trends Microbiol. 8:354-360. [PubMed] 3. Conover, G. M., I. Derre, J. P. Vogel, and R. R. Isberg. 2003. The Legionella pneumophila LidA protein: a translocated substrate of the Dot/Icm system associated with maintenance of bacterial integrity. Mol. Microbiol. 48:305-321. [PubMed] 4. Fraser, D. W., T. R. Tsai, W. Orenstein, W. E. Parkin, H. J. Beecham, R. G. Sharrar, J. Harris, G. F. Mallison, S. M. Martin, J. E. McDade, C. C. Shepard, and P. S. Brachman. 1977. Legionnaires' disease: description of an epidemic of pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 297:1189-1197. [PubMed] 5. Gagnon, E., S. Duclos, C. Rondeau, E. Chevet, P. H. Cameron, O. Steele-Mortimer, J. Paiement, J. J. Bergeron, and M. Desjardins. 2002. Endoplasmic reticulum-mediated phagocytosis is a mechanism of entry into macrophages. Cell 110:119-131. [PubMed] 6. Hay, J. C. 2001. SNARE complex structure and function. Exp. Cell Res. 271:10-21. [PubMed] 7. Horwitz, M. A. 1983. Formation of a novel phagosome by the Legionnaires' disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila) in human monocytes. J. Exp. Med. 158:1319-1331. [PubMed] 8. Horwitz, M. A. 1983. The Legionnaires' disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila) inhibits phagosome-lysosome fusion in human monocytes. J. Exp. Med. 158:2108-2126. [PubMed] 9. Horwitz, M. A., and F. R. Maxfield. 1984. Legionella pneumophila inhibits acidification of its phagosome in human monocytes. J. Cell Biol. 99:1936-1943. [PubMed] 10. Houde, M., S. Bertholet, E. Gagnon, S. Brunet, G. Goyette, A. Laplante, M. F. Princiotta, P. Thibault, D. Sacks, and M. Desjardins. 2003. Phagosomes are competent organelles for antigen cross-presentation. Nature 425:402-406. [PubMed] 11. Kagan, J. C., and C. R. Roy. 2002. Legionella phagosomes intercept vesicular traffic from endoplasmic reticulum exit sites. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:945-954. [PubMed] 12. McLean, I. W., and P. K. Nakane. 1974. Periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde fixative. A new fixation for immunoelectron microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 22:1077-1083. [PubMed] 13. Moyer, B. D., B. B. Allan, and W. E. Balch. 2001. Rab1 interaction with a GM130 effector complex regulates COPII vesicle cis-Golgi tethering. Traffic 2:268-276. [PubMed] 14. Moyer, B. D., J. Matteson, and W. E. Balch. 2001. Expression of wild-type and mutant green fluorescent protein-Rab1 for fluorescence microscopy analysis. Methods Enzymol. 329:6-14. [PubMed] 15. Nagai, H., J. C. Kagan, X. Zhu, R. A. Kahn, and C. R. Roy. 2002. A bacterial guanine nucleotide exchange factor activates ARF on Legionella phagosomes. Science 295:679-682. [PubMed] 16. Nash, T. W., D. M. Libby, and M. A. Horwitz. 1984. Interaction between the legionnaires' disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila) and human alveolar macrophages. Influence of antibody, lymphokines, and hydrocortisone. J. Clin. Investig. 74:771-782. [PubMed] 17. Seabra, M. C., E. H. Mules, and A. N. Hume. 2002. Rab GTPases, intracellular traffic and disease. Trends Mol. Med. 8:23-30. [PubMed] 18. Segal, G., M. Purcell, and H. A. Shuman. 1998. Host cell killing and bacterial conjugation require overlapping sets of genes within a 22-kb region of the Legionella pneumophila genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1669-1674. [PubMed] 19. Solomon, J. M., A. Rupper, J. A. Cardelli, and R. R. Isberg. 2000. Intracellular growth of Legionella pneumophila in Dictyostelium discoideum, a system for genetic analysis of host-pathogen interactions. Infect. Immun. 68:2939-2947. [PubMed] 20. Sturgill-Koszycki, S., and M. S. Swanson. 2000. Legionella pneumophila replication vacuoles mature into acidic, endocytic organelles. J. Exp. Med. 192:1261-1272. [PubMed] 21. Swanson, M. S., and R. R. Isberg. 1995. Association of Legionella pneumophila with the macrophage endoplasmic reticulum. Infect. Immun. 63:3609-3620. [PubMed] 22. Tilney, L. G., O. S. Harb, P. S. Connelly, C. G. Robinson, and C. R. Roy. 2001. How the parasitic bacterium Legionella pneumophila modifies its phagosome and transforms it into rough ER: implications for conversion of plasma membrane to the ER membrane. J. Cell Sci. 114:4637-4650. [PubMed] 23. Tisdale, E. J. 1999. A Rab2 mutant with impaired GTPase activity stimulates vesicle formation from pre-Golgi intermediates. Mol. Biol. Cell 10:1837-1849. [PubMed] 24. Vogel, J. P., H. L. Andrews, S. K. Wong, and R. R. Isberg. 1998. Conjugative transfer by the virulence system of Legionella pneumophila. Science 279:873-876. [PubMed] 25. Wadowsky, R. M., L. J. Butler, M. K. Cook, S. M. Verma, M. A. Paul, B. S. Fields, G. Keleti, J. L. Sykora, and R. B. Yee. 1988. Growth-supporting activity for Legionella pneumophila in tap water cultures and implication of Hartmannellid amoebae as growth factors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:2677-2682. [PubMed] 26. Xu, D., A. P. Joglekar, A. L. Williams, and J. C. Hay. 2000. Subunit structure of a mammalian ER/Golgi SNARE complex. J. Biol. Chem. 275:39631-39639. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
N Engl J Med. 1977 Dec 1; 297(22):1189-97.
[N Engl J Med. 1977]J Clin Invest. 1984 Sep; 74(3):771-82.
[J Clin Invest. 1984]Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Nov; 54(11):2677-82.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988]Trends Microbiol. 2000 Aug; 8(8):354-60.
[Trends Microbiol. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 17; 95(4):1669-74.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]J Exp Med. 1983 Dec 1; 158(6):2108-26.
[J Exp Med. 1983]J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec; 99(6):1936-43.
[J Cell Biol. 1984]J Exp Med. 1983 Oct 1; 158(4):1319-31.
[J Exp Med. 1983]J Cell Sci. 2001 Dec; 114(Pt 24):4637-50.
[J Cell Sci. 2001]Nat Cell Biol. 2002 Dec; 4(12):945-54.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2002]Infect Immun. 1995 Sep; 63(9):3609-20.
[Infect Immun. 1995]J Cell Sci. 2001 Dec; 114(Pt 24):4637-50.
[J Cell Sci. 2001]Mol Microbiol. 1993 Jan; 7(1):7-19.
[Mol Microbiol. 1993]Infect Immun. 2000 May; 68(5):2939-47.
[Infect Immun. 2000]J Histochem Cytochem. 1974 Dec; 22(12):1077-83.
[J Histochem Cytochem. 1974]J Cell Sci. 2001 Dec; 114(Pt 24):4637-50.
[J Cell Sci. 2001]Nat Cell Biol. 2002 Dec; 4(12):945-54.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2002]Cell. 2002 Jul 12; 110(1):119-31.
[Cell. 2002]Nature. 2003 Sep 25; 425(6956):402-6.
[Nature. 2003]Exp Cell Res. 2001 Nov 15; 271(1):10-21.
[Exp Cell Res. 2001]Trends Mol Med. 2002 Jan; 8(1):23-30.
[Trends Mol Med. 2002]Traffic. 2001 Apr; 2(4):268-76.
[Traffic. 2001]Mol Biol Cell. 1999 Jun; 10(6):1837-49.
[Mol Biol Cell. 1999]J Biol Chem. 2000 Dec 15; 275(50):39631-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2000 Dec 15; 275(50):39631-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Mol Microbiol. 2003 Apr; 48(2):305-21.
[Mol Microbiol. 2003]Mol Microbiol. 1993 Jan; 7(1):7-19.
[Mol Microbiol. 1993]Methods Enzymol. 2001; 329():6-14.
[Methods Enzymol. 2001]Mol Microbiol. 2003 Apr; 48(2):305-21.
[Mol Microbiol. 2003]Science. 2002 Jan 25; 295(5555):679-82.
[Science. 2002]