![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2000 European Molecular Biology Organization The Crd1 gene encodes a putative di-iron enzyme required for photosystem I accumulation in copper deficiency and hypoxia in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1569, USA 1Corresponding author e-mail: merchant/at/chem.ucla.edu Received January 21, 2000; Revised March 21, 2000; Accepted March 21, 2000. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Chlamydomonas reinhardtii adapts to copper deficiency by degrading apoplastocyanin and inducing Cyc6 and Cpx1 encoding cytochrome c6 and coproporphyrinogen oxidase, respectively. To identify other components in this pathway, colonies resulting from insertional mutagenesis were screened for copper- conditional phenotypes. Twelve crd (copper response defect) strains were identified. In copper-deficient conditions, the crd strains fail to accumulate photosystem I and light-harvesting complex I, and they contain reduced amounts of light-harvesting complex II. Cyc6, Cpx1 expression and plastocyanin accumulation remain copper responsive. The crd phenotype is rescued by a similar amount of copper as is required for repression of Cyc6 and Cpx1 and for maintenance of plastocyanin at its usual stoichiometry, suggesting that the affected gene is a target of the same signal transduction pathway. The crd strains represent alleles at a single locus, CRD1, which encodes a 47 kDa, hydrophilic protein with a consensus carboxylate-bridged di-iron binding site. Crd1 homologs are present in the genomes of photosynthetic organisms. In Chlamydomonas, Crd1 expression is activated in copper- or oxygen-deficient cells, and Crd1 function is required for adaptation to these conditions. Keywords: di-iron enzyme/light-harvesting complex/oxygen/photosynthesis/plastocyanin Introduction Copper is an essential micronutrient because it functions as a cofactor in enzymes and electron transfer proteins that catalyze oxygen chemistry or redox reactions (e.g. cytochrome oxidase, lysyl oxidase and plastocyanin). Nevertheless, its reactivity in these types of reactions requires that its intracellular abundance be controlled by regulated uptake and distribution so that toxicity is avoided. Copper metabolism has been studied extensively in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where copper resistance mechanisms involving metallothioneins, copper uptake mechanisms involving reductases and transporters, and intracellular copper delivery pathways to cytosolic Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase, the Fet3p multicopper oxidase in the plasma membrane and cytochrome oxidase in the mitochondrion, have been identified (reviewed by Zhou and Thiele, 1993; Askwith et al., 1994; Eide, 1998; Winge et al., 1998; Pena et al., 1999). In S.cerevisiae, genes encoding the high-affinity copper transporters Ctr1p and Ctr3p, and the copper reductases Fre1p and Fre7p are induced by the transcriptional activator Mac1p in response to copper deficiency (Jungmann et al., 1993; Georgatsou et al., 1997; Labbe et al., 1997; Martins et al., 1998). Conversely, when copper levels are high, a related protein, Ace1p, stimulates transcription of CUP1 and CRS5 encoding metallothioneins that sequester and detoxify excess copper (Thiele, 1988; Welch et al., 1989; Culotta et al., 1994). Copper homeostasis therefore involves a balance between the expression and function of the target genes of two transcription factors, Ace1p and Mac1p, and its purpose is to ensure an adequate but not excessive supply of intracellular copper for metabolic pathways requiring copper. Much less is understood about the adaptation of copper-requiring metabolic pathways when intracellular copper is inadequate to saturate the biosynthesis of all copper proteins. Such a situation can occur when the nutritional supply of copper is too low (reviewed by Olivares and Uauy, 1996) or when a genetic defect prevents normal copper assimilation, as in Menkes’ disease (reviewed by Danks, 1995). An excellent model system for the study of this aspect of copper biology is Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. This organism, like many green algae and cyanobacteria, displays a highly regulated adaptive response to copper deficiency that includes compensatory modification of a major metabolic pathway (reviewed by Merchant, 1998b). Plastocyanin, present at a stoichiometry of ~8 × 106 molecules per cell, is the most abundant copper protein in Chlamydomonas and in photosynthetic tissues of vascular plants (Merchant et al., 1991). Plastocyanin transfers electrons from the cytochrome (cyt) b6/f complex to photosystem I (PSI) and hence is an obligatory catalyst in photosynthesis (Gorman and Levine, 1965). Nevertheless, when C.reinhardtii and other algae/cyanobacteria face copper deficiency (<9 × 106 Cu ions/cell for Chlamydomonas) in nature or in the laboratory, they remain photosynthetically competent by replacing plastocyanin function with the heme protein cyt c6 (Wood, 1978; Ho et al., 1979). The processes induced in copper-deficient C.reinhardtii cells are: transcription of Cyc6 (encoding cyt c6) and Cpx1 (encoding the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis enzyme coproporphyrinogen oxidase), degradation of apoplastocyanin and copper assimilation through a pathway involving a transporter and a cupric reductase (Hill and Merchant, 1995; Li and Merchant, 1995; Quinn and Merchant, 1995; Hill et al., 1996; Quinn et al., 1999). The induction of a transport pathway is precedented by the Mac1p-dependent induction of Ctr1p, Ctr3p, Fre1p and Fre7p in S.cerevisiae. The degradation of apoplastocyanin can be rationalized as a mechanism for ensuring re-distribution of copper from the photosynthetic apparatus to the respiratory apparatus in the mitochondrion. Activation of Cpx1 expression has been attributed to an increased demand for heme, the cofactor of cyt c6, in copper-deficient cells. The Cyc6 and Cpx1 genes are likely to be targets of the same copper-responsive signal transduction pathway (Quinn et al., 2000) and, based on the pattern of induction of the assimilatory pathway, it is proposed that so are the genes for the transporter and reductase (Hill et al., 1996). To identify these candidate target genes, and also to identify additional metabolic changes in copper-deficient cells, we sought a genetic approach to the study of copper deficiency in C.reinhardtii. Results The CRD1 locus is defined by a novel phenotype To identify copper response regulators and additional copper-responsive genes besides Cpx1 and Cyc6, insertionally mutagenized cells were screened for copper-conditional phenotypes with the expectation that growth phenotypes might correspond to strains carrying either regulatory mutations or mutations in copper assimilation, while a photosynthesis defect might correspond to a strain in which Cyc6 was disrupted. Either ble (Stevens et al., 1996) or Arg7 (Debuchy et al., 1989) DNA was used for transformation, and 7.5 × 103 zeocin-resistant and 4 × 103 arginine prototrophs were screened after three transfers to +Cu versus –Cu plates. Colonies displaying growth defects were identified as expected, but an unexpected phenotype was also noted at high frequency regardless of whether ble or Arg7 DNA was used for transformation. Approximately 1 in 1 × 103 transformants was yellow/pale-green in copper-deficient conditions but showed wild-type coloration under copper-supplemented conditions (Figure (Figure1),1
Nine independently generated strains were tested for: (i) allelism with the reference allele, crd1-1::ARG7 (Table I); and (ii) linkage with the marker used for transformation. As no recombinants were found among the nine strains tested, we conclude that the mutants represent alleles at a single locus, named CRD1 for copper response defect. To examine linkage of the crd1 phenotype with Arg7 or ble as appropriate, crd1-1 was crossed to arg7, and the other eight crd1-2–crd1-9 strains were crossed to the wild-type strain CC124. All 19 crd1 progeny from the crd1-1×arg7 cross were arginine prototrophs, indicating that crd1-1 is tightly linked to ARG7. Similarly, all progeny from crosses of crd1-2, crd1-5, crd1-6 and crd1-7 with CC124 that displayed the mutant phenotype were also resistant to 10 µg/ml zeocin, demonstrating that crd1 is tightly linked to ble in these four strains. Thus, the CRD1 locus is tagged in five out of nine crd1 strains.
The chlorophyll content in copper-deficient crd1 strains was only 30–40% of that of equivalently grown wild-type cells, but the chlorophyll a:b ratio was unchanged in –Cu crd1 cells (2.51) versus +Cu cells (2.47). Restoration of chlorophyll content to wild-type abundance required 100 nM CuSO4 (Figure (Figure2A).2 Mercuric ions at high concentrations can mimic copper ions in turning off the Cyc6 and Cpx1 genes (Hill et al., 1991; Quinn et al., 2000). If the phenotype resulted from a gain of function in copper deficiency or if expression of the phenotype required the activation of the copper deficiency pathway, it might be rescued by the addition of mercuric ions. However, addition of 10 µM HgCl2, which is enough to repress the Cyc6 and Cpx1 genes completely, did not restore chlorophyll accumulation in –Cu crd1 cultures (Figure (Figure2B).2 Is the chlorotic phenotype a direct or indirect consequence of copper deficiency? We considered two possibilities: first, that the phenotype resulted from a secondary iron deficiency because iron-deficient C.reinhardtii cells are chlorotic (Weger, 1999); and, secondly, that the phenotype resulted from bleaching as a consequence of a photosynthesis defect (Spreitzer and Mets, 1981). In S.cerevisiae and also in humans, copper is required for iron assimilation because it is a cofactor in a multi-copper oxidase involved in iron transport and distribution (Askwith et al., 1994; Harris et al., 1995). Addition of up to 1.5 mM FeSO4 to –Cu cultures of crd1 cells does not restore chlorophyll accumulation, indicating that the loss of chlorophyll in crd1 strains is not a consequence of defective iron uptake (Figure (Figure2C).2 A photosynthesis defect in crd1 strains in either copper- or oxygen-deficient medium Photosynthetic function was examined by monitoring the fluorescence induction and decay kinetics of crd1 strains grown on +Cu versus –Cu medium (Figure (Figure3).3
The Cyc6 and Cpx1 genes respond not only to copper deprivation but also to oxygen deprivation (Quinn et al., 2000). If Crd1 is a target of the same pathway, one might expect to induce the crd1 phenotype in oxygen-depleted cultures. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells grown in low light become oxygen depleted if they are kept suspended by low basal stirring instead of by vigorous aeration (Wood, 1978; J.Quinn, unpublished). Under these conditions, crd1 strains become chlorophyll deficient, and when such hypoxic cells are transferred to aerated medium, chlorophyll accumulation is restored, indicating that the wild-type Crd1 gene is also required in oxygen-deprived cells (Figure (Figure4A).4
The copper-conditional block in electron transfer in crd1 cells suggested that cyt c6 synthesis or accumulation might be affected, although loss of function of the Cyc6 gene seemed unlikely because mutations affecting this step in photosynthetic electron transfer (as in pcy1 or ccs strains) do not result in such drastic reductions in chlorophyll content (Howe and Merchant, 1992; Li et al., 1996). Indeed the abundance and expression of cyt c6 and coprogen oxidase is normal in crd1 cells (Figures (Figures4B4
Gel electrophoretic analysis of total cellular protein showed that copper-deficient crd1 cells do not accumulate the PSI-A/PSI-B polypeptides of PSI and contain reduced amounts of light-harvesting complex I (LHCI) and LHCII polypeptides (Figure (Figure5B).5 Crd1 is a previously unknown protein found in photosynthetic organisms Since five of the nine well characterized crd1 strains appeared to be tagged, we sought to clone Crd1 based on its linkage to the marker genes. Southern analysis of genomic DNA from crd1-7 revealed that the ble gene is present on a 6.5 kb BamHI fragment in this strain (Figure (Figure7A).7
The C.reinhardtii Crd1 gene encodes a 47.2 kDa soluble polypeptide in a 2.6 kb sequence (Figure (Figure8).8
Crd1 expression is activated in –Cu cells Is Crd1 expressed coordinately with Cyc6 and Cpx1? RNA blot analysis reveals that in +Cu wild-type cells, Crd1 mRNA accumulates at a low, basal level and is induced 15- to 20-fold in –Cu cells (Figure (Figure10).10
Discussion Copper-deficient cells require a new protein, Crd1, for normal photosynthesis. The unexpected phenotype of the crd1 strains reveals: (i) an unrecognized role for copper in photosynthetic metabolism; and (ii) an unrecognized biochemical function in maintenance of PSI and LHCs. Crd1 and PSI The phenotype of crd1 strains, namely a pleiotropic deficiency in PSI and light-harvesting proteins, should provide a clue to Crd1 function. For instance, Crd1 could be a novel subunit in a photosynthetic complex that is modified in response to copper and oxygen availability. This is precedented by the occurrence of alternative isoforms of respiratory complex subunits in Saccharomyces mitochondria (reviewed by Kwast et al., 1998). Different isoforms of cytochrome oxidase subunits (encoded by COX5a/COX5b) and cytochrome c (encoded by CYC1/CYC7) are expressed in oxygen-replete versus oxygen-deficient S.cerevisiae cells. A similar phenomenon occurs in response to iron deficiency in cyanobacteria, where the CP43′ polypeptide encoded by isiA is induced to high levels (Laudenbach and Straus, 1988; Burnap et al., 1993; Leonhardt and Straus, 1994; Vinnemeier et al., 1998). Interestingly, the organellar and prokaryotic Crd1 homologs are found in clusters of genes encoding reaction center proteins. Thus, Crd1 could be an alternative copper and oxygen deficiency version of a PSI or LHC subunit, and hence its absence in –Cu crd1 cells could result in destabilization of these complexes. There are numerous examples of multisubunit complexes that are degraded if one of the constituent polypeptides is not synthesized (reviewed by Wollman et al., 1999). However, we do not think that this is the situation here. The biosynthesis and maintenance of C.reinhardtii PSI is well characterized (reviewed by Webber and Bingham, 1998), and LHC deficiency has not been observed in strains carrying deletion mutations in the core polypeptides of PSI (Girard-Bascou et al., 1987; Takahashi et al., 1991). Likewise, mutants affected in LHC abundance do not show a linked PSI defect (Plumley and Schmidt, 1995). Finally, the protein and pigment compositions of the reaction center and light-harvesting apparatus differ significantly between purple photosynthetic bacteria and PSI in the oxygenic organisms (cyanobacteria, algae and plants), precluding a specific structural function for Crd1. Instead, it is more likely that Crd1 and its homologs function in a metabolic pathway that is common to each organism and is important for photosynthetic function. The nature and severity of the crd1 phenotype are dependent on the growth conditions. For example, growth of –Cu crd1 strains at lower temperatures (18°C) partially relieves the chlorophyll deficiency, but does not improve PSI accumulation. In minimal medium the defect is also less pronounced; indeed crd1 cells do grow photoautotrophically (at 50–100 µmol/m2s), indicating that they must contain some PSI. Conversely, cells grown at higher temperatures (25°C) display chlorosis more readily, and the fluorescence transients indicate a reduction in PSII function as well (data not shown). The variation in phenotype can be attributed to the difference in growth rate, as if faster growth exacerbates the phenotype and slower growth ameliorates it. This result is compatible with a defect in cofactor metabolism in crd1. Perhaps the rate of cofactor production becomes more limiting when cell division is occurring more rapidly. Crd1 function What does the Crd1 sequence reveal about its function? Two of the most highly conserved sequences, WCQDENRHGD and SRDEARHAG, separated by ~80 amino acids in the Crd1 proteins, are also present in plastid stearoyl-ACP desaturases (reviewed by Los and Murata, 1998; Shanklin and Cahoon, 1998) and a stearoyl-ACP desaturase from Burkholderia cepacia (Kang et al., 1998), respectively. These sequences contain consensus D/EExxH motifs for the carboxylate-liganded di-iron-binding class of enzyme. The prototypical members of this class are the acyl-ACP desaturases, the R2 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase and methane monooxygenase, and the characteristic feature of these enzymes is that the Fe ions are bridged by carboxylates and oxide or hydroxide ions. Two D/EExxH motifs, usually separated by ~100 amino acids, provide two carboxylate and two imidazole ligands for the di-iron cluster. Di-iron enzymes catalyze oxidation of a substrate by activation of molecular oxygen at the di-iron cluster. They also require a source of electrons for reducing at least one of the oxygen atoms to water. For the plastid desaturases, reduced ferredoxin provides the electrons. In all Crd1 homologs, the D/EExxH motifs are separated by the right distance and occur in highly conserved regions of the proteins (Figure (Figure9A).9 What might its substrate be? The best characterized plant di-iron enzymes are the plastid acyl-ACP desaturases, but we doubt that Crd1 is a fatty acid desaturase because there is no similarity between Crd1 and four different Chlamydomonas desaturases. Another possibility is that it might be involved in the biosynthesis of an as yet unidentified xanthophyll. This model is attractive because of the structural roles of carotenoids and xanthophylls in the photosystems and LHCs. However, a lor1 npq2 double mutant, which is blocked in the production of the most abundant xanthophylls (presumed precursors for other xanthophylls) (Niyogi et al., 1997, 1998), does not display –Cu induced chlorosis. Hence, the phenotype is unlikely to be caused by a xanthophyll deficiency. A third option is that Crd1 might be involved in some aspect of quinone modification or in generation of a radical in PSI. While we cannot rule out these models, they are inconsistent with the occurrence of Crd1 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides (which has a completely different complement of quinone cofactor and a different type of photosynthetic reaction center). A fourth possibility is that Crd1 function lies in metabolism of a metal cofactor. We favor this model and suggest further that this metal cofactor might be iron because the phenotype of crd1 strains is strikingly similar to that of iron-deficient cells (J.Moseley, unpublished). Although we could not rescue the crd1 strains by provision of extracellular iron, it is possible that the defect is compartment specific (i.e. in the plastid). Alternatively, the defect may not lie in supply but in mobilizing iron for biosynthesis of iron-containing proteins. In this context, we propose that Crd1 and its homologs are plastid localized. In at least two eukaryotes, the homologous gene is plastid encoded, indicating that in those organisms the Crd1-like protein functions in the plastid. Examination of the C.reinhardtii and vascular plant sequences reveals an N-terminal extension relative to the cyanobacterial and plastid-encoded sequences, supporting the idea that the nucleus-encoded proteins may be targeted to an organelle. Characterization of the crd1 phenotype also suggests a plastid site of action. Specifically, we note reduced accumulation of both nucleus- and plastid-encoded gene products at a post-transcriptional level (Figures (Figures55 Response to copper and oxygen deficiency The induction of cyt c6 in copper-deficient algal cells has been understood for over two decades as a back up mechanism to ensure photosynthetic function when plastocyanin cannot be synthesized (Wood, 1978; Merchant and Bogorad, 1987b). Molecular characterization of copper-deficient C.reinhardtii cells revealed a number of other responses that occur coordinately with activation of the Cyc6 gene, and these have each been rationalized as mechanisms for adaptation to copper deficiency (see Introduction). Recently, we noted that two of the targets of the signal transduction pathway, Cyc6 and Cpx1, are also induced in hypoxic cells (Quinn et al., 2000). The significance of the response to hypoxia is not well understood. One model, proposed initially by Wood (1978), is that oxygen-deficient cells become copper deficient in nature because of the reduced solubility of Cu(I) relative to Cu(II), and we have argued that the response to oxygen might be a way for the organism to anticipate and prepare for copper deficiency in the natural environment (Quinn et al., 2000). Nevertheless, in the laboratory, oxygen-deficient cultures are not copper deficient because they can accumulate holoplastocyanin and provision of excess copper does not repress the hypoxic response (Figure (Figure4B;4 How can we rationalize the requirement for Crd1 function in copper-deficient and oxygen-deficient cells? Crd1 expression resembles that of Cpx1, with a basal level of RNA accumulation in copper-supplemented cells and a 15- to 20-fold increase in copper and oxygen deficiency (Figure (Figure10).10 Crd1 distribution and expression Crd1 homologs are found exclusively in photosynthetic organisms—plants, cyanobacteria, photosynthetic bacteria and algae (March 2000 database) (Figure (Figure9A).9 Interestingly, multiple homologs of Crd1 are found in C.reinhardtii, Synechocystis sp. and Anabaena sp. (~50–65% identity for homologs in the same species); each of these organisms has a signal transduction pathway for responding to copper deficiency and each replaces plastocyanin with cyt c6 (reviewed by Merchant, 1998a). Possibly one copy of the gene has evolved a specialized pattern of expression that is important primarily for adaptation to copper deficiency, while the other has a so-called ‘housekeeping’ function similar to that of Crd1 homologs in vascular plants. A search of the CyanoMutants database for Synechocystis sp. knockouts indicates that one of the disrupted genes (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession No. D90899) could not be segregated, which is consistent with the possibility that the gene might be essential, while no phenotype is reported for the disruption of the other gene (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession No. D90912). Perhaps the latter gene encodes the functional equivalent of C.reinhardtii Crd1—the strain might well show a phenotype if tested in copper-deficient medium. In Chlamydomonas, Crd1 is expressed at a very low level in cells grown in copper-supplemented acetate medium, but is highly induced in copper deficiency, consistent with the model that its function is more important when copper is limiting. Accordingly, the cells show a strong phenotype in –Cu medium. A Crd1 homolog, which we have called Cth1 (for copper-target homolog) was found in the Chlamydomonas EST database (Figure (Figure9B,9 Materials and methods Strains and culture conditions Mutants were generated in the background of Chlamydomonas strain CC425 (arg2, cw15) and crossed as described below. The preparation of copper-deficient (–Cu) media for culturing C.reinhardtii strains is described in Quinn and Merchant (1998). Cultures were transferred three times to –Cu medium from a +Cu inoculum in order to eliminate residual intracellular copper. Copper-supplemented medium was either prepared by the standard method (Harris, 1989) or copper salts were added to –Cu medium at the concentrations indicated. Iron was added from a 100 mM copper-free stock solution of chelated FeSO4 that was prepared by boiling 100 mM FeSO4 (Aldrich) with 134 mM EDTA in an acid-washed bottle. The pH was adjusted to 6.5 with KOH while maintaining the temperature above 70°C, and the solution was left at ~20°C for 2–7 days prior to use. Mercuric salts were added from a stock solution (10 mM) to the final concentration indicated. Liquid cultures were grown usually in 125 or 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks at 21–24°C with agitation at 200–250 r.p.m. and light intensity between 50 and100 µmol/m2s. Strains were cultured on plates at either 18 or 25°C at light intensities between 5 and 100 µmol/m2s. To generate O2-deprived cultures, 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks filled with 200 ml of copper-supplemented TAP medium were inoculated to an initial cell density of 1 × 106 cells/ml and agitated by slow stirring on a magnetic stirring plate set at the lowest possible speed. Ambient temperature was 20–24°C and the light intensity was ~10 µmol/m2s. Samples were collected for analysis after 3 days of growth. Chlorophyll determination Cells were collected from duplicate 1 ml aliquots of the culture by centrifugation (14 000 r.p.m. in a microcentrifuge), chlorophyll was extracted from the pellet into 80% acetone in methanol and its concentration was determined spectrophotometrically after removal of protein by centrifugation. Chlorophyll a:b ratios were determined according to the method of Porra et al. (1989). Fluorescence measurements A fluorescence imaging system built by Professor David Kramer at the Center for Advanced Biochemical Instrumentation Institute of Biological Chemistry (Washington State University, Pullman, WA) was used to measure the in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics of colonies. Prior to fluorescence measurements, cells grown on solid TAP medium were incubated overnight at 18°C at 10–25 µmol/m2s and dark adapted for at least 5 min. The colonies were illuminated for 1.73 s with 30 µmol/m2s of red light (640 nm) from light-emitting diodes (HLMP C116, Hewlett Packard) and the emitted fluorescence was captured immediately by a CCD camera (Cohu, 2122–1000) in conjunction with a PIXCI-SV4 imaging board and XCIP software (EPIX Incorporated, Buffalo Grove, IL). Protein analysis Samples from equal numbers of cells were prepared and analyzed for accumulation of plastocyanin, cyt c6 and coprogen oxidase as described previously (Quinn and Merchant, 1998; Quinn et al., 1999). Proteins were usually transferred to PVDF membranes for 1 h at 100 V in blotting buffer containing 20% methanol. The following solutions were used for processing the blots: wash, Tris-buffered saline with 0.2% Tween-20 (TBS-Tween); block, 30% calf serum in TBS-Tween, primary antibody in 10% calf serum in TBS-Tween. The antibodies were used at the following dilutions: anti-plastocyanin 1:10 000, anti-cyt c6 1:5000, anti-coprogen oxidase 1:3000 and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit IgG (Biorad) at 1:50 000. The blots were washed three times after each incubation. Bound antibody was detected with chemiluminescent reagents. For analysis of membrane proteins, samples were prepared similarly to the soluble proteins, except that whole cells were used and samples were only boiled for 45 s to avoid aggregation of the PSI core polypeptides. The separating gel contained 12% total acrylamide and the standard Tris-glycine blotting buffer contained 0.01% SDS in addition. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes for 2 h at 50 V. Blots were incubated overnight with primary antibodies as follows: 1:1000 anti-PSI-A, 1:1000 anti-PSI-F, 1:1000 anti-PSI/LHCI, 1:5000 anti-D1, 1:800 anti-LHCII, 1:1000 anti-cytochrome f, 1:1000 anti-Reiske iron–sulfur protein and 1:5000 anti-CF1. A 1:3000 dilution of alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Southern Biotechnology Associates) was used as the secondary antibody, and bound antibody was detected using the alkaline phosphatase color reaction as described (Sambrook et al., 1989). RNA blot analysis RNA abundance was estimated by blot analysis as described previously (Quinn et al., 1999). For psaB, a 1 kb BamHI fragment from the EcoRI fragment of chloroplast DNA in plasmid p67A (Chlamydomonas Culture Collection) was used as the probe. The CabII coding probe and the CabII-1 3′-untranslated region (UTR) probe are described in Jacobshagen and Johnson (1994). For Cpx1, the probe was made from the 102 bp HindIII fragment from pCpx1.0 (Quinn et al., 1999). The Crd1 probe was made from a 1.2 kb PstI–XhoI fragment of pCrd1-5. The other probes are described in Quinn et al. (1999). The specific activities ranged from 5 × 108 to 7 × 108 c.p.m./µg DNA. Hybridization signals were visualized after exposure to Kodak X-OMAT Blue XB-1 film at –80°C with two intensifying screens (Alad, Cyc6, Cpx1, Crd1, Gsa, Gsr and Ppx1) or at room temperature without screens (psaB and RbcS2). Exposure times (Figure (Figure6)6 Genetic analysis Generation of gametes, matings and zygote dissections was performed as described by (Harris, 1989). For linkage analysis, at least six complete tetrads or 12 crd1 progeny were scored for segregation of the mutant phenotype with arginine prototrophy (crd1-1×arg7) or resistance to 10 µg/ml zeocin (Stevens et al., 1996) (crd1-2–crd1-9×CC124). Alleles crd1-2–crd1-9 were each crossed to crd1-1 to test for recombination. Inverse PCR Genomic DNA from strain crd1-7 was prepared by a modified miniprep procedure and 5 µg of DNA was digested [6–10 h, 37°C, 100 U of BamHI (NEB)]. The restriction enzyme was denatured (80°C, 20 min), and the DNA was ligated [overnight, 15°C, 450 µl volume containing 1× ligase buffer (Gibco-BRL), 1 mM ATP and 2 U of T4 DNA ligase (Gibco-BRL)]. The DNA was extracted with phenol–chloroform–isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1), chloroform, recovered by precipitation with ethanol and dissolved in 10 µl of water. A 6.5 kb inverse PCR product was obtained by amplification of 2 µl of ligated DNA with divergent primers A3 (GAAGTCGTCCTCCACGAAGT) and A4 (GACGTGACCCTGTTCATCAG) complementary to sequences within the ble gene (Stevens et al., 1996) and Pfx polymerase from Gibco-BRL. Cloning and sequencing of Crd1 A 3 kb BamHI–HindIII fragment of the inverse PCR product was cloned into pBluescript KS– (Stratagene) and used to probe a Chlamydomonas genomic library in λEMBL3 by plaque hybridization. Three clones whose inserts contained overlapping DNA were obtained, each of which complemented the crd1 phenotype of an arg2crd1-6 strain when introduced into the nuclear genome along with the Arg7 gene by glass bead transformation. The inserts were subcloned into pBluescript KS+ (Stratagene) to generate plasmids pCrd1-3, pCrd1-4, pCrd1-5 and pCrd1-7 (Figure (Figure7B),7 Acknowledgements We thank all the members of this laboratory for their input into the project: Ms Paola Barraco for her assistance in isolating mutants, Ms Rebecca Nelson for assistance in library screening, Ms Luisita Dolfini for assistance in sequencing and Dr Beth Dreyfuss for her comments on the manuscript. We also thank Drs Kevin Redding, Jean-David Rochaix, Stephen Mayfield, Catherine de Vitry and Roberto Bassi for their kind donation of antibodies, Dr Krishna Niyogi for providing the lor1 npq2 mutant strain and Dr Michael Goldschmidt-Clermont for the genomic library. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, GM 42143. J.M. was supported, in part, by a Dissertation Year Fellowship from the Graduate Division at UCLA and M.E. by a long-term EMBO fellowship. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biofactors. 1993 May; 4(2):105-15.
[Biofactors. 1993]Cell. 1994 Jan 28; 76(2):403-10.
[Cell. 1994]Annu Rev Nutr. 1998; 18():441-69.
[Annu Rev Nutr. 1998]Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1998 Apr; 2(2):216-21.
[Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1998]J Nutr. 1999 Jul; 129(7):1251-60.
[J Nutr. 1999]Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 May; 63(5):791S-6S.
[Am J Clin Nutr. 1996]EMBO J. 1991 Jun; 10(6):1383-9.
[EMBO J. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Dec; 54(6):1665-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965]Eur J Biochem. 1978 Jun 1; 87(1):9-19.
[Eur J Biochem. 1978]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Feb 8; 545(2):236-48.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979]EMBO J. 1995 Mar 1; 14(5):857-65.
[EMBO J. 1995]J Biol Chem. 1995 Oct 6; 270(40):23504-10.
[J Biol Chem. 1995]Plant Cell. 1995 May; 7(5):623-8.
[Plant Cell. 1995]Plant Physiol. 1996 Oct; 112(2):697-704.
[Plant Physiol. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1999 May 14; 274(20):14444-54.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Apr 24; 251(1):23-30.
[Mol Gen Genet. 1996]EMBO J. 1989 Oct; 8(10):2803-9.
[EMBO J. 1989]EMBO J. 1991 Jun; 10(6):1383-9.
[EMBO J. 1991]EMBO J. 1995 Mar 1; 14(5):857-65.
[EMBO J. 1995]J Biol Chem. 1991 Aug 15; 266(23):15060-7.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 3; 275(9):6080-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Cell. 1994 Jan 28; 76(2):403-10.
[Cell. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Mar 28; 92(7):2539-43.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jan; 30(1):15-37.
[Plant Mol Biol. 1996]J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 3; 275(9):6080-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Eur J Biochem. 1978 Jun 1; 87(1):9-19.
[Eur J Biochem. 1978]EMBO J. 1992 Aug; 11(8):2789-801.
[EMBO J. 1992]J Biol Chem. 1996 Dec 6; 271(49):31283-9.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1987 Jul 5; 262(19):9062-7.
[J Biol Chem. 1987]Plant Physiol. 1998 Jan; 116(1):27-35.
[Plant Physiol. 1998]J Exp Biol. 1998 Apr; 201(Pt 8):1177-95.
[J Exp Biol. 1998]J Bacteriol. 1988 Nov; 170(11):5018-26.
[J Bacteriol. 1988]Plant Physiol. 1993 Nov; 103(3):893-902.
[Plant Physiol. 1993]Plant Mol Biol. 1994 Jan; 24(1):63-73.
[Plant Mol Biol. 1994]FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998 Dec 15; 169(2):323-30.
[FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Oct 2; 1394(1):3-15.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998 Jun; 49():611-641.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998]Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Oct; 64(10):3939-47.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9; 94(25):14162-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Plant Cell. 1998 Jul; 10(7):1121-34.
[Plant Cell. 1998]Eur J Biochem. 1978 Jun 1; 87(1):9-19.
[Eur J Biochem. 1978]EMBO J. 1987 Sep; 6(9):2531-5.
[EMBO J. 1987]J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 3; 275(9):6080-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Exp Biol. 1998 Apr; 201(Pt 8):1177-95.
[J Exp Biol. 1998]Mol Microbiol. 1997 Jul; 25(2):399-409.
[Mol Microbiol. 1997]Plant Physiol. 1998 Jan; 116(1):27-35.
[Plant Physiol. 1998]DNA Res. 1999 Dec 31; 6(6):369-73.
[DNA Res. 1999]Methods Enzymol. 1998; 297():263-79.
[Methods Enzymol. 1998]Methods Enzymol. 1998; 297():263-79.
[Methods Enzymol. 1998]J Biol Chem. 1999 May 14; 274(20):14444-54.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]J Biol Chem. 1999 May 14; 274(20):14444-54.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Eur J Cell Biol. 1994 Jun; 64(1):142-52.
[Eur J Cell Biol. 1994]Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Apr 24; 251(1):23-30.
[Mol Gen Genet. 1996]Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Apr 24; 251(1):23-30.
[Mol Gen Genet. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Feb; 87(3):1228-32.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990]