Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
Sci Rep. 2013; 3: 2929.
Published online 2013 Oct 14. doi:  10.1038/srep02929
PMCID: PMC3796310

Voltage and Power-Controlled Regimes in the Progressive Unipolar RESET Transition of HfO2-Based RRAM


Resistive switching (RS) based on the formation and rupture of conductive filament (CF) is promising in novel memory and logic device applications. Understanding the physics of RS and the nature of CF is of utmost importance to control the performance, variability and reliability of resistive switching memory (RRAM). Here, the RESET switching of HfO2-based RRAM was statistically investigated in terms of the CF conductance evolution. The RESET usually combines an abrupt conductance drop with a progressive phase ending with the complete CF rupture. RESET1 and RESET2 events, corresponding to the initial and final phase of RESET, are found to be controlled by the voltage and power in the CF, respectively. A Monte Carlo simulator based on the thermal dissolution model of unipolar RESET reproduces all of the experimental observations. The results contribute to an improved physics-based understanding on the switching mechanisms and provide additional support to the thermal dissolution model.

The charge-based flash memory, which dominates the huge non-volatile memory (NVM) market, faces serious scaling limitations due to the difficulty of confining electrons within thinner and leakier potential barriers and has some intrinsic disadvantages such as a high operation voltage, a long program/erase time, and a limited endurance. Resistive switching memory (RRAM) is widely accepted to have a great potential to overcome these limitations and thus is a powerful candidate for future NVM and storage class memory because of its simple structure, good scalability, high speed, low power and ease of integration with CMOS back-end-of-the-line processes1,2,3,4,5,6. In RRAM, data storage is achieved through the reversible resistive switching (RS) between at least two stable resistance states, the high resistance state (HRS or OFF-state) and the low resistance state (LRS or ON-state). RRAM devices, which have been identified as a solid-state implementation of a memristive system, are also very promising for reconfigurable logic applications and for neuromorphic computer architectures7,8,9. RS is usually induced with a ramped or pulsed electrical stress of the same (unipolar switching) or opposite polarity (bipolar switching) and has been reported in a wide variety of materials, including binary oxides10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 and complex perovskite oxides18,19, etc., among which HfO2 is one of the most widely investigated and most competitive resistive switching functional materials. To successfully push RRAM into applications, it is imperative to solve some key issues, such as revealing the physics underlying the RS phenomena20,21,22,23,24,25,26 with special emphasis on the related statistics27,28,29,30,31 and the effective control of the statistical variation of the switching parameters32. For the filament-type RRAM devices, the mechanism of the SET transition from HRS to LRS or the conductive filament (CF) formation is comparatively clear and is interpreted as a defect-induced soft-breakdown, involving the oxidation/reduction (redox) processes of metal cations or oxygen anions in the interfaces and bulk of the RS layer and their migration through this layer2,20,31. However, the mechanism of the RESET transition or the CF rupture is more complicated. The electrochemical reactions and/or Joule heat might play a crucial role2,33,34,35,36,37. Furthermore, the microscopic nature of the CF is still under discussion. On the other hand, the detailed process of the CF rupture and the physics of the RESET transition has not yet been fully addressed.

In this work, we systematically investigate the RESET process of Pt/HfO2/Pt RRAM structures operated in the unipolar mode13. The switching occurs by the destruction and reformation of a CF due to redox processes involving the generation and movement of oxygen vacancies13,30,31. In a typical RESET cycle with a voltage ramp, an abrupt current jump event (RESET1) usually occurs just after reaching the maximum current, followed by a progressive RESET phase consisting of several successive smaller current drops between well-defined intermediate states with the conductance falling between those of the LRS and the HRS. This progressive RESET phase precedes the complete CF rupture, which is detected as a final abrupt current jump (RESET2) of several orders of magnitude. The statistical analysis of the evolution of the current, the voltage and the power reveals the existence of two different RESET regimes. For the first time we found that RESET1 is determined by the voltage applied to the CF while the progressive RESET stage and RESET2 are determined by the power dissipated in the CF. The transition from the voltage-controlled to the power-controlled regime depends on the CF conductance and the series resistance. To further understand these RESET processes, the evolution of the statistical distribution of conductance is reported as a function of the voltage, and all of the experimental observations are reproduced with a Monte Carlo simulator based on the thermal dissolution model29,30,33,34,35.


The studied Pt/HfO2/Pt RRAM device13 (see Methods Section) displays unipolar switching. Figure 1 shows some typical RESET current-voltage (IV) and conductance-voltage (GV) curves in which the conductance, defined as I/(VG0) in units of the quantum of conductance G0 = 2e2/h, corresponds to the series combination of the CF resistance and the access series resistance, which has been estimated to be RS ~ 28 Ω30 (see Figure S1 in Supplementary Information). A single channel quantum wire (inset C in Figure 1) with a conductance of ~G038,39, represents a natural boundary between two qualitatively different electron transport regimes. One corresponds to a continuous CF (insets A and B), in the sense that the electron wave functions are extended along the conduction path. The other is related to a broken CF (inset D) in which the conduction is limited by a potential barrier, i.e., a CF with a gap in which the electron transport occurs by hopping or tunneling. Notice that the final current jump (RESET2) corresponding to the CF rupture always crosses the G0 boundary. In the majority of the cases (green curves in Figure 1), a large and abrupt current drop occurs just after reaching the maximum current (RESET1 marked with red circles), followed by successive current drops of a smaller magnitude between several intermediate states (inset B). These intermediate states reveal the discrete nature of the CF and suggest its evolution through different atomic-size configurations of a reduced cross-section before a gap is fully opened at RESET2 (blue circles). In other switching cycles (red curves), the current reduction is rather progressive, and only the final current jump is evident. In a few cases, the RESET1 leads to the complete CF disconnection such that RESET1 and RESET2 coincide. These abrupt RESET transitions (black curves) are usually observed when the CF has a high initial ON-state conductance (An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m7.jpg) and reaches very high RESET currents. On the other hand, fully progressive RESET transients usually occur when the CF has a low initial conductance.

Figure 1
Three typical experimental GV and IV curves showing abrupt RESET (black curves), RESET in several successive jumps (green curves) and progressive RESET (red curves).

To reach a holistic understanding of the RESET transient, we need to investigate the details of the RESET1 and RESET2 events and the progressive evolution of the CF conduction properties. Therefore, we have studied the statistics of 1250 successive SET/RESET cycles in a single device. For clarity, only a random selection of 10% of the experimental GV curves is reported in Figure 2a, together with the corresponding RESET1 and RESET2 points. Up to the RESET1 point, the conductance is found to decrease continuously due to the increase of the local temperature in the CF29,30,33,34,35. The conductance of RESET2 point (GR2) is of the order of a few times the quantum of conductance and reaches the limit of approximate G0 for those samples that show RESET2 at the higher voltages. In fact, at RESET2, we can represent the CF conductance as GR2 = mβG0 where m is an integer number representing the number of one-dimensional quantum-mechanical conducting modes and β is a coupling parameter (0 < β < 1) which can model several effects which limit the conductance of these modes. It has been argued, for example, that each conducting one-dimensional subband under high bias, i.e., in the so-called nonlinear conduction regime, contributes with βG0 to the CF conductance40. In an atomic-scale conducting CF or quantum wire (QW), the voltage mainly drops at the interfaces with the external reservoirs, and the value of β is the fraction of voltage that drops at the cathode interface. The value of β might change with the actual geometry of the CF and with its coupling to the reservoirs. The presence of impurities in the QW can also reduce the transmission coefficient below unity so that even in the linear regime the contribution to conductance can be smaller than G0. Experimental results similar to ours, including the observation of integer and non-integer quantized conductance in RRAM, have been recently reported41,42,43,44,45,46. The value of β ~ 0.5 can be associated with a rather symmetric voltage drop at both CF/electrode interfaces. Both our work and another recent work41 proved that most of the conductance of the intermediate states concentrates around the integer multiples of ~0.5G0. For this reason, in our simulator, we have also selected 0.5G0 for each individual GCF drop in the RESET process.

Figure 2
Experimental RESET behavior of a Pt/HfO2/Pt RRAM device.

Figures 2b and 2c show the CF RESET voltage (An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m8.jpg) versus the CF RESET resistance (An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m9.jpg) and the CF RESET power (An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m10.jpg) versus the CF ON-state resistance (An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m11.jpg) scatter plots, respectively. An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m12.jpg represents the CF resistance at the beginning of the RESET experiment while An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m13.jpg is the CF resistance just at the RESET point. Both resistance values are very similar when considering the RESET1 point, but they can be radically different for RESET2 because the CF has been partially RESET before the RESET2 point. Figure 2b shows that An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m14.jpg is roughly independent of An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m15.jpg (see S2 of the Supporting Information) while An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m16.jpg monotonously increases with An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m17.jpg. Figure 2c demonstrates the relation An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m18.jpg by assuming An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m19.jpg = 0.25 V and a constant An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m20.jpg independent of An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m21.jpg. The small number of blue circles that appear on top of the red circles in Figures 2b and 2c correspond to the cycles showing abrupt RESET. Figures 2b and 2c demonstrate that RESET1 is controlled by the voltage applied to the CF while RESET2 is controlled by the power dissipated in the CF. Thus, the RESET transition is divided into two regimes: the voltage controlled RESET1 regime and the power controlled RESET2 regime. The ON-resistance is a very important parameter influencing the statistical variations of the RESET process. Figure S2 in Supplementary Information further shows that both the RESET1 voltage and the current before data correction scale with An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m22.jpg30, and thus it is important to control the variation of ON-resistance to obtain highly uniform distributions of the RESET parameters. Some recent works22,23 have reported similar scaling behaviors and the scaling theory of the RESET1 voltage and the current in unipolar Pt/NiO/Pt devices. The observed crossover behaviors in the scaling were explained in terms of the connectivity of conducting filaments by analogy with percolation theory. Alternatively, in our work, we explain the two experimental An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m23.jpg versus An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m24.jpg scaling regimes in terms of the thermal dissolution model of RESET29,30,35.

To further explore the RESET transients, we studied the evolution of the statistical distribution of the conductance as a function of the applied voltage (V), as shown in Figure 2d. Some voltage snapshots of the conductance distribution are shown in Figure 3. Before V = 0.4 V, each cycle almost maintains its initial high conductance state (G ~ 300G0) such that the distribution remains practically unchanged except for a small shift related to a temperature increase. The high initial conductance is kept by a fraction of cycles when V reaches 0.5 to 0.7 V and even 0.8 V. The occurrence of some completely abrupt RESET transitions (RESET1 = RESET2) is also appreciated starting at V = 0.5 V because some cycles already show G < G0. From V = 0.4 V, many cycles suffer an abrupt conductance drop (RESET1), and a peak of intermediate conductances (<50G0) appears in the distribution. After the initial jump, the RESET is progressive, and the peak of the distribution moves downwards to lower conductance. The average conductance of the intermediate states decreases with V. At approximately V = 1.1 V, the conductance of all of the remaining cycles is approximately G0, indicating that the CF behaves as a single-channel quantum wire at the final stage of dissolution.

Figure 3
The probability density function of the normalized conductance (n = I/(G0V)) for some illustrative values of V.

The experimental observations shown in Figures 1 and and22 can be interpreted well by the thermal dissolution model29,30,33,34,35. This model assumes that RESET occurs due to the temperature-activated oxidation of the oxygen-deficient CF. The CF temperature is determined by the balance between the energy dissipation in the CF and heat evacuation, which can be phenomenologically modeled through a thermal resistance (Rth). According to Ielmini et al.35, the CF RESET voltage can be written as

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m1.jpg

where RCF is the CF electrical resistance, T0 is room temperature, and TR is the critical RESET temperature. A value of TR = 750 K provides a good fit to the An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m25.jpg scatter plot in Figure 2b. Eq. (1) also shows that a key element to explain the experimental results is an adequate modeling of Rth, which should include the contributions of two different heat evacuation paths: the parallel thermal resistance (R||) related to the heat loss along the CF, and the perpendicular thermal resistance (R) accounting for the heat transfer from the CF surface to the surrounding oxide. Thus, the combined thermal resistance Rth can be calculated as

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m2.jpg

According to the Wiedemann-Franz law33, R|| is proportional to RCF and can be written as R|| = RCF/(8LTR), where L = 2.45 × 10−8 W Ω K−2 is the Lorentz number. On the other hand, a constant R can be assumed as a first order approximation. Before RESET1 when RCF is small, the heat loss in the transport direction is very efficient, and Rth is mainly determined by R||, so the ratio RCF/Rth remains constant, resulting in a An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m26.jpg independent of RCF. On the contrary, once RCF reaches sufficiently high values due to the partial CF dissolution, R becomes dominant, and RCF/Rth increases with RCF. Thus, according to Eq. (1),An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m27.jpg tends to increase with RCF in this regime (Figure 2b), while the RESET power An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m28.jpg becomes practically independent of RCF (Figure 2c). Thus, we can say that the RESET enters into a power-controlled regime. The existence of these two RESET regimes was suggested by a subtle change of An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m29.jpg reported in Ref. 35 where only RESET1 was considered, but the initial CF resistance was varied using either a partial RESET method or a current limited SET using a 1T1R configuration. The results shown in Figures 2b and 2c are obtained with a different methodology because we consider the whole RESET transient following the progressive change of RCF and including both RESET1 (with a rather narrow distribution of RCF) and RESET2 (equivalent to the RESET of CFs with much higher and widely-distributed RCF), instead of varying the initial CF resistance. Our results provide a much clearer picture of the dependence of the RESET parameters on RCF and provide stronger experimental support to the CF thermally-assisted dissolution model.

The series resistance, RS, plays an important role in the occurrence of abrupt or progressive RESET event and the corresponding change of the CF morphology. Considering the series combination of the CF and RS, the applied voltage at RESET can be calculated as An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m30.jpg, and the total normalized conductance is given by n = 1/[(RCF + RS)G0]. Eliminating RCF from these two equations and Eq. (1), we obtain the VRn relation as

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m3.jpg

which is compared to experiments in Figure 2a. The calculated An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m31.jpg curve is also plotted in the experimental scatter plot of Figure 2b. In both cases, the experiments are nicely fitted by assuming R = 5 × 106 K W−1, a value which is lower than that estimated for NiO in Ref. 35. The non-zero RS explains why the nVR curve in Figure 2a has two branches. In the upper branch, a significant fraction of the applied voltage drops on RS such that An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m32.jpg. As An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m33.jpg is constant according to Eq. (1), VR1 increases with GCF. In the lower branch, the VRGCF trend is the opposite because RSRCF and RthR. The upper branch explains the first abrupt RESET event and also explains the change of the CF size from inset A to B in Figure 1. The non-zero RS plays an important role in the existence of the upper branch and the existence of the RESET1 events. If RS = 0, VR1 will equal to An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m34.jpg, so VR1 will become constant according to Eq. (1), and thus the upper branch and the RESET1 events will disappear, as shown in Figure S3 in Supplementary Information. The lower branch explains the progressive RESET phase that precedes the final RESET2 drop and the change of the CF size from inset B to C in Figure 1 as well. When the RESET1 point is reached, CFs with high and low conductance display different behaviors. If the initial conductance is relatively low and located in the lower branch, for each small increment of V, the conductance shows small drops because any conductance drop leads to an increase of the voltage required to maintain TR. In other words, there is a negative feedback process that limits the conductance drop at constant voltage, thus leading to the progressive RESET behavior. On the contrary, if the CF conductance is initially high and the RESET occurs in the upper branch, any small drop of the conductance causes an increase of VCF because a smaller fraction of the applied voltage drops in the series resistance. The increase of VCF produces a subsequent increase of the CF temperature (TCF), which is maintained above TR until the CF conductance reaches the lower branch. Thus, the series resistance effects explain the large RESET currents and the large and abrupt conductance drops observed at RESET1 in those cycles with a high initial CF conductance. The magnitude of the abrupt conductance drop registered at RESET1 is as large as necessary to reach the lower branch of the curve (with a certain statistical dispersion). The magnitude of this abrupt conductance drop is related to GON and it is determined by the voltage-dependent separation between the two conductance branches. Once the conductance has dropped from the high branch to the low branch, the progressive RESET process begins. However, there is also a non-negligible probability of the CF to be completely ruptured at RESET1 due to damage propagation effects. This abrupt RESET is more probable when the initial CF conductance is very high and the RESET current reaches the maximum values. In this case, there is no progressive RESET following the abrupt RESET1 event, which directly decreases the CF conductance well below G0.


To help understand the experimental RESET statistical results, we developed a simulator based on the thermal dissolution model29,30,33,34,35. Because the RESET is related to the random occurrence of single-atom events at the nanoscale (i.e., an oxygen atom diffuses and recombines with one vacancy of the CF), the simulation of the RESET process needs to be stochastic. In other words, the Monte Carlo method is necessary in our simulation. Figure 4 shows the flowchart of our proposed Monte Carlo simulator. We simulate the application of a staircase voltage ramp, as used in the actual experiments. In each time interval, the applied voltage is kept constant as V(i) = I × ΔV, and the evolution of the normalized CF conductance (nCF) is stochastically decided by generating random numbers and comparing them with the RESET probability, FR(i). In the thermal dissolution model, the RESET is considered to occur by the out-diffusion of the conducting defects (i.e., oxygen vacancies) when the local CF temperature TCF(i) is close enough to a critical value, which we call the RESET temperature TR. In this situation, the average number of RESET events occurring during a fix time interval (such as the ith interval of our MC simulation) is also thermally activated and can be expressed as

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m4.jpg

where Ea is the activation energy (likely related to the process of oxygen diffusion), KB is the Boltzmann constant and TCF(i) is the temperature of the CF during the ith interval. Considering that the RESET events occur at random, the probability that at least one RESET event occurs during the ith simulation interval, FR(i), can be calculated according to the Poisson distribution:

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m5.jpg

According to this probability distribution, ~63% of the samples have suffered RESET when the CF temperature reaches TR. The width of the distribution of temperature at RESET depends on the activation energy. The higher is Ea, the narrower the distribution of RESET temperature. In the simulation, the CF temperature TCF(i) is related to the CF voltage according to

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m6.jpg

where VCF(i) is calculated as An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m35.jpg. Before the RESET1 point, RCF is assumed to change with temperature as RCF(i) = R0[1 + γα(TCF(i) − T0)], which is typical for metals and degenerately doped semiconductors35. Here, γ is the geometrical coefficient corresponding to the shape of the CF, and α is the resistance-temperature coefficient. The fitting of experiments yields γα ~ 6 × 10−4 K−1.

Figure 4
Flowchart of the Monte Carlo simulator used for the simulation of RESET switching cycle.

In each time interval, the occurrence of a RESET event is decided by comparing a random number with FR(i). After one of these partial RESET events, GCF drops by 0.5G0 (i.e., nCF drops by 0.5) on average39,40,41. Larger conductance drops are also considered by introducing correlations between successive events. These discrete conductance drops are consistent with the idea that the CF consists of a percolating web of even smaller atomic-size filaments formed by oxygen vacancy chains with a conductance of the order of G038. Once GCF is changed, TCF and FR are recalculated, and the process is repeated as many times as dictated by the comparison of successive random numbers (r1) with the evolving FR(i), until GCF drops below G0, which is considered to correspond to the complete CF rupture.

The results are found to be most sensitive to the values of R and Ea. Figure 5 shows the simulation results with fixed values for all of the model parameters, in particular, TR = 750 K, R = 5 × 106 K W−1 and Ea = 1 eV, which is a typical value in oxide-based RRAM devices33. The same set of initial CF conductance values as those found in the 1250-cycle experiment was used as the starting value of the normalized CF conductance for the simulation. The comparison of Figures 5 and and22 reveals that the complete phenomenology of RESET is nicely captured by the stochastic simulation, including the initial abrupt event after RESET1, the subsequent progressive RESET phase (Figure 5a), and the overall evolution of the conductance distribution (Figure 5d). Moreover, the simulation reproduces the resistance-independent An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m36.jpg (Figure 5b) that defines the voltage-controlled RESET regime, and the constant An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep02929-m37.jpg (Figure 5c) contributing to the power-controlled regime. Even the random occurrence of fully progressive and completely abrupt RESET transients, corresponding to the lowest and highest initial CF conductance, respectively, is reproduced (inset in Figure 5a). These results demonstrate that the thermal dissolution model provides a solid framework not only for the initial phase of the RESET process (RESET1), as considered in previous works33,34,35, but also to explain the main features of the whole RESET transient, including the abrupt and progressive RESET phases.

Figure 5
Simulation results of the RESET switching with fixed Ea and R.

The statistical dispersion of the simulated RESET parameters in Figure 5 is significantly smaller than that found in the experiments (Figure 2). Thus, random variations of R and Ea have been incorporated into the MC code, which is reasonable because the CF shape is different in each cycle and the local atomic-scale variations of the CF configuration can induce strong changes in the local transport and chemical properties. The simulation results in Figure 6 are much more similar to the experimental results.

Figure 6
Simulation results of the RESET switching with variable Ea and R.

In summary, the voltage-ramp induced RESET of HfO2-based RRAM devices is reported to show both abrupt and progressive phases preceding the final complete CF rupture. Different RESET phenomenology has been reported as a function of the initial CF conductance. High conductance paths usually show a first voltage-controlled abrupt RESET jump followed by a power-controlled progressive RESET phase. The most resistive CFs directly enter into the progressive RESET phase. These two phases are related to two different thermal evacuation regimes in which the heat flows through the CF in the electron transport direction and from the CF surface to the surrounding oxide, respectively. Based on the thermally activated CF dissolution model, we constructed a Monte Carlo simulator that remarkably reproduces the main experimental features of the RESET process, including the abrupt and progressive phases and the evolution of the conductance distributions. The results strongly support the thermal dissolution model, improve our understanding of the progressive rupture of the CF under unipolar switching conditions and highlight the impact of the series resistance on the RESET dynamics. The progressive RESET process increases the stress requirements for the full transition to the HRS, which is not advantageous to uniformity of the device. This issue needs to be accounted in the design of the RESET operation algorithms to avoid RESET failures in the one-bit/cell device. Current sweeping mode can facilitate effectively eliminating the intermediate states in RESET transition. In the practical application, the RRAM device is operated in pulse mode and the probability of the progressive RESET will be strongly suppressed at the high stress voltages required for fast pulse RRAM operation. On the other hand, filament engineering such as introducing metal NC or other electric-field-concentrating initiators to control the CF formation path is advantageous to improve the uniformity and reliability of RRAM. Our methodology reported in this work can be easily extended to the RESET and SET switching in all kinds of RRAM devices, which will guide people to understand the physics of RS behavior more clearly and optimize the performances of RRAM device with effective methods.


Device fabrication

The studied RRAM device with a Pt/HfO2/Pt structure was fabricated onto a tungsten plug. The 10-nm-thick HfO2 resistive switching layer was deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD) at 350°C on the Pt bottom electrode (BE), followed by Pt top electrode (TE) deposition and patterning by photolithography and etching. Pt BE and TE were deposited by physical vapor deposition (PVD).


To initiate the resistive switching, a preliminary electroforming process similar to a soft dielectric breakdown event is required. It is a one-time writing process at voltage higher than regular operation voltage. After the electroforming operation, long lasting repetitive cycling experiments were performed using voltage ramp stress (VRS) both for SET and RESET with an Agilent 4155C semiconductor parameter analyzer. The IV curves in the 1250 successive SET/RESET cycles were recorded to a device with an area of 1 µm2. During the SET transition, a compliance current with 1 mA was applied by 4155C to avoid the hard breakdown of the HfO2 layer. RESET test was stopped when the HRS resistance was 300 or 350 times higher than the LRS resistance.

Author Contributions

S.L., E.M. and J.S. did the data analysis and interpreted the results. C.C., L.P. and J.B. fabricated the devices and performed the voltage-ramp cycling experiments. S.L. and X.L. performed the Monte Carlo simulations. J.S., S.L., F.P. and M.L. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors critically read and contributed to the manuscript preparation. J.S. and M.L. coordinated and supervised the whole work.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information:

Supplementary Information


This work was funded in part by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology under contract TEC2012-32305 (partially funded by the European Union FEDER Program), the DURSI of the Generalitat de Catalunya under contract 2009SGR783, the MOST of China under Grant Nos. 2010CB934200, 2011CBA00602, 2009CB930803 and 2011CB921804 and the NSFC under Grant Nos. 61221004, 61322408, 61334007, 61274091, 61106119 and 61106082. J. S. also thanks the support of the ICREA ACADEMIA award and Chinese Academy of Sciences Visiting Professorship for Senior International Scientists. Devices and data were obtained in the frame of internal CEA-LETI research programs.


  • Waser R. & Aono M. Nanoionics-based resistive switching memories. Nat. Mater. 6, 833–840 (2007). [PubMed]
  • Waser R., Dittmann R., Staikov G. & Szot K. Redox-based resistive switching memories-Nanoionic mechanisms, prospects, and challenges. Adv. Mater. 21, 2632–2663 (2009).
  • Sawa A. Resistive switching in transition metal oxides. Mater. Today 11, 28–36 (2008).
  • Lee M.-J. et al. A fast, high-endurance and scalable non-volatile memory device made from asymmetric Ta2O(5−x)/TaO(2−x) bilayer structures. Nat. Mater. 10, 625–630 (2011). [PubMed]
  • Burr G. W. et al. Overview of candidate device technologies for storage-class memory. IBM J. Res. & Dev. 52, 449–464 (2008).
  • Yang X. & Chen I.-W. Dynamic-load-enabled ultra-low power multiple-state RRAM devices. Sci. Rep. 2, 744 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Strukov D. B., Snider G. S., Stewart D. R. & Williams R. S. The missing memristor found. Nature 453, 80–83 (2008). [PubMed]
  • Yang J. J., Pickett M. D., Li X., Ohlberg D. A. A., Stewart D. R. & Williams R. S. Memristive switching mechanism for metal/oxide/metal nanodevices. Nat. Nanotech. 3, 429–433 (2008). [PubMed]
  • Yang J. J., Strukov D. B. & Stewart D. R. Memristive devices for computing. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 13–24 (2013). [PubMed]
  • Kim K. M., Jeong D. S. & Hwang C. S. Nanofilamentary resistive switching in binary oxide system: a review on the present status and outlook. Nanotechnology 22, 254002 (2011). [PubMed]
  • Kwon D. H. et al. Atomic structure of conducting nanofilaments in TiO2 resistive switching memory. Nature Nanotech. 5, 148–153 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Cagli C., Nardi F. & Ielmini D. Modeling of set/reset operations in NiO-based resistive-switching memory (RRAM) devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 56, 1712–1720 (2009).
  • Cagli C. et al. Experimental and theoretical study of electrode effects in HfO2 based RRAM. IEDM Tech. Dig. 658–661 (2011).
  • Yu S., Guan X. & Wong H.-S. P. On the stochastic nature of resistive switching in metal oxide RRAM: physical modeling, Monte Carlo simulation, and experimental characterization. IEDM Tech. Dig. 413–416 (2011).
  • Yao J. et al. In situ imaging of the conducting filament in a silicon oxide resistive switch. Sci. Rep. 2, 242 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Liu Q. et al. Real-time observation on dynamic growth/dissolution of conductive filaments in oxide-electrolyte-based ReRAM. Adv. Mater. 24, 1844–1849 (2012). [PubMed]
  • Yang Y. et al. Observation of conducting filament growth in nanoscale resistive memories. Nat. Commun. 3, 732–739 (2012). [PubMed]
  • Szot K., Speier W., Bihlmayer G. & Waser R. Switching the electrical resistance of individual dislocations in single-crystalline SrTiO3. Nat. Mater. 5, 312–320 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Nian Y. B., Strozier J., Wu N. J., Chen X. & Ignatiev A. Evidence for an oxygen diffusion model for the electric pulse induced resistance change effect in transition-metal oxides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146403 (2007). [PubMed]
  • Kim S. et al. Physical electro-thermal model of resistive switching in bi-layered resistance-change memory. Sci. Rep. 3, 1680 (2013). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chae S. C. et al. Random circuit breaker network model for unipolar resistance switching. Adv. Mater. 20, 1154–1159 (2008).
  • Lee S. B. et al. W. Scaling behaviors of reset voltages and currents in unipolar resistance switching. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 212105 (2008).
  • Lee J. S. et al. Scaling theory for unipolar resistance switching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 205701 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Rozenberg M. J. et al. Mechanism for bipolar resistive switching in transition-metal oxides. Phys. Rev. B 81, 115101 (2010).
  • Syu Y.-E. et al. Redox reaction switching mechanism in RRAM device with Pt/CoSiOX/TiN structure. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32, 545–547 (2011).
  • Chang K.-C. et al. Origin of hopping conduction in graphene-oxide-doped silicon oxide resistance random access memory devices. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34, 677–679 (2013).
  • Guan X., Yu S. & Wong H.-S. P. On the switching parameter variation of metal-oxide RRAM – Part I: physical modeling and simulation methodology. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 59, 1172–1182 (2012).
  • Yu S., Guan X. & Wong H.-S. P. On the switching parameter variation of metal-oxide RRAM – Part II: model corroboration and device design strategy. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 59, 1183–1188 (2012).
  • Long S. et al. Reset statistics of NiO-based resistive switching memories. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32, 1570–1572 (2011).
  • Long S. et al. Cycle-to-cycle intrinsic RESET statistics in HfO2-based unipolar RRAM devices. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34, 623–625 (2013).
  • Long S. et al. A model for the set statistics of RRAM inspired in the percolation model of oxide breakdown. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34, 999–1001 (2013).
  • Liu Q. et al. Controllable growth of nanoscale conductive filaments in solid-electrolyte-based ReRAM by using a metal nanocrystal covered bottom electrode. ACS Nano 10, 6162–6168 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Russo U., Ielmini D., Cagli C. & Lacaita A. L. Filament conduction and reset mechanism in NiO-based resistive-switching memory (RRAM) devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 56, 186–192 (2009).
  • Russo U., Ielmini D., Cagli C. & Lacaita A. L. Self-accelerated thermal dissolution model for reset programming in unipolar resistive-switching memory (RRAM) devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 56, 193–200 (2009).
  • Ielmini D., Nardi F. & Cagli C. Physical models of size-dependent nanofilament formation and rupture in NiO resistive switching memories. Nanotechnology 22, 254022 (2011). [PubMed]
  • Nardi F., Larentis S., Balatti S., Gilmer D. C. & Ielmini D. Resistive switching by voltage-driven ion migration in bipolar RRAM – Part I: experimental study. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 59, 2461–2467 (2012).
  • Larentis S., Nardi F., Balatti S., Gilmer D. C. & Ielmini D. Resistive switching by voltage-driven ion migration in bipolar RRAM – Part II: modeling. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 59, 2468–2475 (2012).
  • Cartoixà X., Rurali R. & Suñé J. Transport properties of oxygen vacancy filaments in metal/crystalline or amorphous HfO2/metal structures. Phys. Rev. B 86, 165445 (2012).
  • Long S. et al. Quantum-size effects in hafnium-oxide resistive switching. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 183505 (2013).
  • Miranda E. et al. Nonlinear conductance quantization effects in CeOX/SiO2-based resistive switching devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 012910 (2012).
  • Zhu X. et al. Observation of conductance quantization in oxide-based resistive switching memory. Adv. Mater. 24, 3941–3946 (2012). [PubMed]
  • Geresdi A., Halbritter A., Gyenis A., Makk P. & Mihály G. From stochastic single atomic switch to nanoscale resistive memory device. Nanoscale 3, 1504–1508 (2011). [PubMed]
  • Jameson J. R. et al. Quantized conductance in Ag/GeS2/W conductive-bridge memory cells. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33, 257–259 (2012).
  • Tappertzhofen S., Valov I. & Waser R. Quantum conductance and switching kinetics of AgI-based microcrossbar cells. Nanotechnology 23, 145703 (2012). [PubMed]
  • Tsuruoka T., Hasegawa T., Terabe K. & Aono M. Conductance quantization and synaptic behavior in a Ta2O5-based atomic switch. Nanotechnology 23, 435705 (2012). [PubMed]
  • Syu Y.-E. et al. Atomic-level quantized reaction of HfOX memristor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 172903 (2013).

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group
PubReader format: click here to try


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...