Logo of springeropenLink to Publisher's site
Metabolomics
Metabolomics. Aug 2013; 9(4): 757–764.
Published online Jul 12, 2013. doi:  10.1007/s11306-013-0564-3
PMCID: PMC3715687

An analysis of a ‘community-driven’ reconstruction of the human metabolic network

Abstract

Following a strategy similar to that used in baker’s yeast (Herrgård et al. Nat Biotechnol 26:1155–1160, 2008). A consensus yeast metabolic network obtained from a community approach to systems biology (Herrgård et al. 2008; Dobson et al. BMC Syst Biol 4:145, 2010). Further developments towards a genome-scale metabolic model of yeast (Dobson et al. 2010; Heavner et al. BMC Syst Biol 6:55, 2012). Yeast 5—an expanded reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network (Heavner et al. 2012) and in Salmonella typhimurium (Thiele et al. BMC Syst Biol 5:8, 2011). A community effort towards a knowledge-base and mathematical model of the human pathogen Salmonellatyphimurium LT2 (Thiele et al. 2011), a recent paper (Thiele et al. Nat Biotechnol 31:419–425, 2013). A community-driven global reconstruction of human metabolism (Thiele et al. 2013) described a much improved ‘community consensus’ reconstruction of the human metabolic network, called Recon 2, and the authors (that include the present ones) have made it freely available via a database at http://humanmetabolism.org/ and in SBML format at Biomodels (http://identifiers.org/biomodels.db/MODEL1109130000). This short analysis summarises the main findings, and suggests some approaches that will be able to exploit the availability of this model to advantage.

Keywords: Metabolism, Modelling, Systems biology, Networks, Metabolic networks

Main findings of the Recon 2 paper

A highly curated consensus reconstruction of the human metabolic network, termed Recon 2, was recently released (Thiele et al. 2013). The development of the network followed a community ‘jamboree’ approach (Herrgård et al. 2008; Dobson et al. 2010; Heavner et al. 2012; Thiele and Palsson 2010), exploiting both genomic and literature data to expand upon existing reconstructions (Duarte et al. 2007; Ma et al. 2007; Gille et al. 2010) to produce a ‘basal’ network that contains 7,440 reactions, 5,063 metabolite pools and 2,626 unique metabolites. The reconstruction is extensively semantically annotated (Kell and Mendes 2008; Courtot et al. 2011), fully compliant with the MIRIAM standard (Le Novère et al. 2005), unambiguously identifying cellular compartments, metabolites, genes and enzymes with publicly available, external database terms (Krause et al. 2011). Thus, cellular compartments are annotated with Gene Ontology (GO) terms, while metabolites are annotated with terms from resources such as Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) (Hastings et al. 2013) as well as using IUPAC International Chemical Identifier (InChI http://www.iupac.org/home/publications/e-resources/inchi.html) terms (Coles et al. 2005) where possible. Reactions are curator-validated and annotated with PubMed literature references, standardized GO evidence codes, and a confidence scoring system ranging from 0 (no evidence) to 4 (biochemical evidence). Metabolic reactions were checked to ensure correct stoichiometry, (ir)reversibility, the correct assignment of gene association and enzyme rules, and mass and charge balancing. Appropriate transport reactions were also included and these followed the same level of annotation as reactions.

In contrast to existing resources such as KEGG (Kanehisa and Goto 2000) or the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) (Wishart et al. 2007), Recon 2 acts as both a knowledgebase and a predictive model, amenable to constraint-based analysis approaches such as flux balance analysis (Orth et al. 2010). To demonstrate this utility, the Recon 2 authors focused on five analyses of immediate interest. First they defined a metabolic task as a nonzero flux through a reaction or through a pathway leading to the production of a metabolite B from a metabolite A; 354 such metabolic tasks were defined and all carried out successfully in silico. Secondly, they established whether known mutations producing ‘inborn errors of metabolism’ (IEMs) did have the predicted effect on biomarkers (54 reported biomarkers for 49 different IEMs, with an accuracy of 77 %; see also Shlomi et al. 2009). Thirdly, they showed that Recon 2 should predict a large fraction of metabolites that are excreted (the ‘metabolic footprint’ (Allen et al. 2003) or ‘exometabolome’ (Kell et al. 2005)). Fourthly, based on expression profiling data from the Human Protein Atlas (Uhlén et al. 2010), they generated 65 draft cell-type-specific models, and fifthly they found (notwithstanding the rather promiscuous behaviour of many drugs (Hopkins 2008, 2009; Kell et al. 2013)) that they could map 1,290 drugs to 308 enzyme and enzymatic complexes.

Some known shortcomings of Recon 2

While Recon 2 represents the ‘state of the art’ of public human metabolic network reconstructions, it should be acknowledged that it does have some known shortcomings, including the fact that a number of known metabolites and reactions (including those involving unliganded iron (Hower et al. 2009; Kell 2009, 2010; Chifman et al. 2012; Funke et al. 2013)) have still to be included, and there are increasing numbers of ‘unexpected’ metabolite-protein reactions that are being discovered (Li et al. 2010; Li and Snyder 2011; Kell 2011; Kell et al. 2013). These are thus mainly ‘false negatives’ (Broadhurst and Kell 2006), and dealing with them is clearly one of the goals that will remain in any continuing curation process. It is recognised that the network reconstruction process is iterative (Reed and Palsson 2003), and the metabolomics and systems biology communities are encouraged to contribute to this ongoing effort. Following an approach that has been applied successfully in the generation of subsequent iterations of the yeast consensus model (Herrgård et al. 2008; Dobson et al. 2010; Heavner et al. 2012), suggested updates and amendments can be e-mailed to network.reconstruction@manchester.ac.uk.

What the Recon 2 network will allow us to do or to do better

General benefits of network models

As discussed previously (Kell 2006a; b), the availability of a systems biology model of a metabolic network allows one to effect a variety of analyses, some of which are illustrated in Fig. 1. We here mention just a few that are likely to be of most interest to the metabolomics community.

Fig. 1
A summary of some of the intellectual areas in which we can create and exploit the contents of systems biology models as encoded in SBML

Improved predictions of metabolic fluxes, including in biotechnology

Given the topology of a network, and the stoichiometric and thermodynamic constraints under which metabolic networks must operate (Palsson 2006; Kell 2006a; b), it is possible to use generalised kinetics to predict metabolic fluxes (Liebermeister and Klipp 2006; Smallbone et al. 2007; Smallbone and Simeonidis 2008; Smallbone et al. 2010). The accuracy of these predictions can of course be enhanced by the use of known kinetic rate equations (Li et al. 2010), and even by expression profiles alone (Lee et al. 2012). Such an approach has been applied, exploiting both transcriptomics and fluxomics data, to constrain models derived from a precursor of Recon 2 in order to elucidate and validate new drug targets in renal-cell cancer (Frezza et al. 2011).

The use of network biology in predicting fluxes (and how to change them), as well as in parameter optimisation (Mendes and Kell 1998; Moles et al. 2003; Adams et al. 2013), has enjoyed particular success in biotechnology where it is usually the fluxes to external products that are of interest (Park et al. 2007; Lee et al. 2012; Park et al. 2010; Becker et al. 2011). In this area, the ongoing development of a systems biology toolkit for Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, which will be increasingly utilised for biotechnological production of pharmaceutical proteins (Kildegaard et al. 2013), will be aided by the development of Recon 2, which can act as a template for development of a detailed metabolic reconstruction of CHO. Additionally, one may anticipate the importance of predictions of metabolic fluxes in understanding nutrition and regulation in health and disease.

Understanding and incorporating knowledge of drugs that use known transporters

As part of the need to incorporate ‘new’ proteins and their interactions with small molecules, one particular feature that has become increasingly apparent in recent years is that pharmaceutical drugs do not normally cross membranes ‘passively’ through any phospholipid bilayer portions that they may contain, but hitchhike on the carriers that participate in the transmembrane transport of intermediary metabolites (Al-Awqati 1999; Dobson and Kell 2008; Dobson et al. 2009; Dobson et al. 2009; Kell and Dobson 2009; Giacomini et al. 2010; Burckhardt and Burckhardt 2011; Kell et al. 2011; Lanthaler et al. 2011; DeGorter et al. 2012; Kell and Goodacre 2013). It is likely that these kinds of issues contribute significantly to the dreadful attrition rates still seen in drug development (van der Greef and McBurney 2005; Kola and Landis 2004; Kola 2008; Empfield and Leeson 2010; Leeson and Empfield 2010; Kwong et al. 2011). The availability of Recon 2 and its tissue-specific versions will now make it much easier to correlate drug disposition with transporter expression, and thereby determine (with suitable machine learning analyses (Kell et al. 2001)) the roles of the different transporters in effecting the cellular uptake and efflux of particular drugs. Incorporating this kind of knowledge into subsequent iterations of Recon 2 is an urgent priority.

Other approaches to mining the metabolic network

An important recognition (Herrgård et al. 2008), continued in Recon 2, was that of the utility of the methods of cheminformatics (Gasteiger 2003) in providing chemically accurate and database-independent descriptions of the structures of metabolites that allowed models (such as those encoded in SBML (Hucka et al. 2003; Hucka et al. 2004)) to be interrogated computationally. In a similar vein, there is an increasing trend towards automated reasoning about the content of scientific papers from a systems biology point of view (Hakenberg et al. 2004; King et al. 2005; Ananiadou et al. 2006; Kell and Mendes 2008; Ananiadou et al. 2010; Ray et al. 2010; Miwa et al. 2012, 2013), including about their metabolomes (Knox et al. 2007; Attwood et al. 2009; Attwood et al. 2010; Nobata et al. 2011; Zhou et al. 2012; Hastings et al. 2013). The availability of Recon 2 will allow one to ask questions such as, “how many metabolites with a given substructure are present in the network?” or “which metabolites are common (or different) between these two networks?” or to plot out the distributions of various kinds of properties that may be of interest (Dobson et al. 2009); one such plot, simply showing the distribution of molecular masses, is given in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
An assessment of the distribution of molecular masses of the metabolites in Recon 2

Comparison with the experimental metabolome

Analysis of the metabolome as encoded in biochemical networks also leads one to recognise the importance of comparing systems biology models with the experimental metabolome (i.e. the concentrations of small molecules) measured in different circumstances (‘comparative metabolomics’, Raamsdonk et al. 2001; Levandi et al. 2008). As with Recon 2, the experimental metabolome of, for example, human serum consists of several thousands of reproducibly detectable metabolites (O’Hagan et al. 2005; 2007; Begley et al. 2009; Zelena et al. 2009). While some of these experimentally observed metabolites will certainly originate from nutrients or the gut microbiome (Goodacre 2007; Li et al. 2008; Wikoff et al. 2009; Zhao and Shen 2010; Wang et al. 2011; Bennett et al. 2013; Collino et al. 2013; Heinken et al. 2013), Recon 2 allows one to set down those that are at least encoded in the human genome sequence, and compare these with the contents of the various metabolome databases (Brown et al. 2009; Kamp et al. 2012; van Ravenzwaay et al. 2012; Sawada et al. 2012; Steinbeck et al. 2012; Tautenhahn et al. 2012; Wishart 2012; Zhou et al. 2012; Guo et al. 2013; Hastings et al. 2013; Haug et al. 2013; Li et al. 2013; Salek et al. 2013; Sakurai et al. 2013; Wishart et al. 2013). Data standards such as SBRML (Dada et al. 2010) allow a straightforward comparison of network models with experimental data encoded in a compatible format.

The importance of semantic annotation

Many of the application areas described above are dependent upon the semantic awareness of Recon 2, and the incorporation of thousands of unique, persistent, unambiguous semantic annotations that allow for software-driven analyses of the knowledgebase and derived models. By representing both the network and its semantic information using community-driven standards such as SBML (Hucka et al. 2003, 2004) and MIRIAM (Le Novère et al. 2005), software producers are able to develop against a given standard, decoupling the network model from the techniques used in its various more specialized analyses.

There is increasing community interest in the development of tissue- and condition-specific models, and this task is dependent upon the integration of large-scale ‘omics data. Methods to perform such integration are many-fold and are in constant development (Mo et al. 2009; Jerby et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2012), but all are reliant on automated approaches, given that the size of the datasets involved renders manual integration impossible. Recon 2 is annotated with third-party identifiers across numerous scales, from genomics through to transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics, all of which can be mapped to appropriate web services, allowing for their automated interpretation (Swainston and Mendes 2009) and integration of multi-omics data (Li et al. 2008, 2008; Hyduke et al. 2013). Additionally, the definition of metabolites in structural terms permits the exploitation of cheminformatics tools such as the Chemistry Development Toolkit (Steinbeck et al. 2003) and Open Babel that allow one to translate the various encodings or mappings of chemical structures (O’Boyle et al. 2011).

Furthermore, the specification of metabolites, enzymes and reactions in unambiguous terms facilitates the development of knowledgebases and models of related organisms, through automated or semi-automated means (Henry et al. 2010; Swainston et al. 2011; Agren et al. 2013). Recon 2 can therefore act as a template for the development of metabolic reconstructions of related model organisms, facilitating comparative studies and simulation of metabolism between human and other model systems (Sigurdsson et al. 2010).

Concluding remarks

The availability of Recon 2 allows a great many computational analyses to be performed. We have purposely rehearsed these at a rather general level, since particular analyses, that might be relevant to particular diseases, for instance, are simply implementations of the more general approaches. One new approach that will depend on the existence of such a network as a necessary resource is personalised medicine (Hood and Flores 2012). There one will develop models of metabolism calibrated for each specific individual, in large part using metabolomics methods, to be used as bases for diagnostics and decisions on course of treatment. Recon 2 is a very significant step towards such a map, where such measurements have to be anchored for various types of modelling that will underpin personalised treatment decisions.

The development of tissue- and condition-specific models has been demonstrated with Recon 2 and its predecessors (Jerby et al. 2010; Frezza et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012). As subsequent iterations of Recon 2 develop, it is hoped that the scope of the knowledgebase, and the predictive power of derived models, will increase to keep pace with advancements in the community knowledge of human metabolism, many of which will be driven by the discipline of metabolomics.

Acknowledgments

PM and NS thank the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) (Grant BB/K019783, BB/J019259, BB/J015512, BB/I020535, BB/I008349), the European Commission FP7 programme (Grant 289434, BioPreDyn) and the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Grant GM080219) for financial support.

Contributor Information

Neil Swainston, Phone: +44-161-306-4492, Fax: +44-161-306-4556, ku.ca.retsehcnam@notsniaws.lien.

Pedro Mendes, ku.ca.retsehcnam@sednem.ordep.

Douglas B. Kell, ku.ca.retsehcnam@kbd.

References

  • Adams R, Clark A, Yamaguchi A, et al. SBSI: an extensible distributed software infrastructure for parameter estimation in systems biology. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:664–665. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt023. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Agren R, Liu L, Shoaie S, Vongsangnak W, Nookaew I, Nielsen J. The RAVEN toolbox and its use for generating a genome-scale metabolic model for Penicillium chrysogenum. PLoS Computational Biology. 2013;9:e1002980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002980. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Al-Awqati Q. One hundred years of membrane permeability: does overton still rule? Nature Cell Biology. 1999;1:E201–E202. doi: 10.1038/70230. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Allen JK, Davey HM, Broadhurst D, et al. High-throughput characterisation of yeast mutants for functional genomics using metabolic footprinting. Nature Biotechnology. 2003;21:692–696. doi: 10.1038/nbt823. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ananiadou S, Kell DB, Tsujii J. Text mining and its potential applications in systems biology. Trends in Biotechnology. 2006;24:571–579. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ananiadou S, Pyysalo S, Tsujii J, Kell DB. Event extraction for systems biology by text mining the literature. Trends in Biotechnology. 2010;28:381–390. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.04.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Attwood TK, Kell DB, McDermott P, Marsh J, Pettifer SR, Thorne D. Calling International rescue: knowledge lost in literature and data landslide! Biochemical Journal. 2009;424:317–333. doi: 10.1042/BJ20091474. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Attwood TK, Kell DB, McDermott P, Marsh J, Pettifer S, Thorne D. Utopia documents: linking scholarly literature with research data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:i568–i574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq383. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Becker J, Zelder O, Häfner S, Schröder H, Wittmann C. From zero to hero–design-based systems metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for l-lysine production. Metabolic Engineering. 2011;13:159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.01.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Begley P, Francis-McIntyre S, Dunn WB, et al. Development and performance of a gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis for large-scale non-targeted metabolomic studies of human serum. Analytical Chemistry. 2009;81:7038–7046. doi: 10.1021/ac9011599. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bennett BJ, Vallim TQ, Wang Z, et al. Trimethylamine-N-oxide, a metabolite associated with atherosclerosis, exhibits complex genetic and dietary regulation. Cell Metabolism. 2013;17:49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.011. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Broadhurst D, Kell DB. Statistical strategies for avoiding false discoveries in metabolomics and related experiments. Metabolomics. 2006;2:171–196. doi: 10.1007/s11306-006-0037-z. [Cross Ref]
  • Brown M, Dunn WB, Dobson P, et al. Mass spectrometry tools and metabolite-specific databases for molecular identification in metabolomics. Analyst. 2009;134:1322–1332. doi: 10.1039/b901179j. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Burckhardt G, Burckhardt BC. In vitro and in vivo evidence of the importance of organic anion transporters (OATs) in drug therapy. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. 2011;201:29–104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14541-4_2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chifman J, Kniss A, Neupane P, et al. The core control system of intracellular iron homeostasis: a mathematical model. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2012;300:91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.01.024. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Coles SJ, Day NE, Murray-Rust P, Rzepa HS, Zhang Y. Enhancement of the chemical semantic web through the use of InChI identifiers. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2005;3:1832–1834. doi: 10.1039/b502828k. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Collino S, Martin FP, Rezzi S. Clinical metabolomics paves the way towards future healthcare strategies. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2013;75:619–629. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Courtot M, Juty N, Knüpfer C, et al. Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology. Molecular Systems Biology. 2011;7:543. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dada JO, Spasic I, Paton NW, Mendes P. SBRML: a markup language for associating systems biology data with models. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:932–938. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq069. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • DeGorter MK, Xia CQ, Yang JJ, Kim RB. Drug transporters in drug efficacy and toxicity. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2012;52:249–273. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134529. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dobson PD, Kell DB. Carrier-mediated cellular uptake of pharmaceutical drugs: an exception or the rule? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2008;7:205–220. doi: 10.1038/nrd2438. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dobson PD, Lanthaler K, Oliver SG, Kell DB. Implications of the dominant role of transporters in drug uptake by cells. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2009;9:163–184. doi: 10.2174/156802609787521616. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dobson PD, Patel Y, Kell DB. “Metabolite-likeness” as a criterion in the design and selection of pharmaceutical drug libraries. Drug Discovery Today. 2009;14:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.10.011. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dobson PD, Smallbone K, Jameson D, et al. Further developments towards a genome-scale metabolic model of yeast. BMC Systems Biology. 2010;4:145. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Duarte NC, Becker SA, Jamshidi N, et al. Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2007;104:1777–1782. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610772104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Empfield JR, Leeson PD. Lessons learned from candidate drug attrition. IDrugs. 2010;13:869–873. [PubMed]
  • Frezza C, Zheng L, Folger O, et al. Haem oxygenase is synthetically lethal with the tumour suppressor fumarate hydratase. Nature. 2011;477:225–228. doi: 10.1038/nature10363. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Funke C, Schneider SA, Berg D, Kell DB. Genetics and iron in the systems biology of Parkinson’s disease and some related disorders. Neurochemistry International. 2013;62:637–652. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2012.11.015. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gasteiger J, editor. Handbook of chemoinformatics: from data to knowledge. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2003.
  • Giacomini KM, Huang SM, Tweedie DJ, et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2010;9:215–236. doi: 10.1038/nrd3028. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gille C, Bölling C, Hoppe A, et al. HepatoNet1: a comprehensive metabolic reconstruction of the human hepatocyte for the analysis of liver physiology. Molecular Systems Biology. 2010;6:411. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Goodacre R. Metabolomics of a superorganism. Journal of Nutrition. 2007;137:259S–266S. [PubMed]
  • Guo AC, Jewison T, Wilson M, et al. ECMDB: the E. coli Metabolome Database. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41:D625–D630. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks992. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hakenberg J, Schmeier S, Kowald A, Klipp E, Leser U. Finding kinetic parameters using text mining. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology. 2004;8:131–152. doi: 10.1089/1536231041388366. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hastings J, de Matos P, Dekker A, et al. The ChEBI reference database and ontology for biologically relevant chemistry: enhancements for 2013. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41:D456–D463. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Haug K, Salek RM, Conesa P, et al. MetaboLights-an open-access general-purpose repository for metabolomics studies and associated meta-data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41:D781–D786. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Heavner BD, Smallbone K, Barker B, Mendes P, Walker LP. Yeast 5—an expanded reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. BMC Systems Biology. 2012;6:55. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Heinken A, Sahoo S, Fleming RM, Thiele I. Systems-level characterization of a host-microbe metabolic symbiosis in the mammalian gut. Gut Microbes. 2013;4:28–40. doi: 10.4161/gmic.22370. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Henry CS, DeJongh M, Best AA, Frybarger PM, Linsay B, Stevens RL. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nature Biotechnology. 2010;28:977–982. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1672. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Herrgård MJ, Swainston N, Dobson P, et al. A consensus yeast metabolic network obtained from a community approach to systems biology. Nature Biotechnology. 2008;26:1155–1160. doi: 10.1038/nbt1492. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hood L, Flores M. A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory. New Biotechnology. 2012;15:613–624. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2012.03.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hopkins AL. Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. Nature Chemical Biology. 2008;4:682–690. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.118. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hopkins AL. Predicting promiscuity. Nature. 2009;462:167–168. doi: 10.1038/462167a. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hower V, Mendes P, Torti FM, et al. A general map of iron metabolism and tissue-specific subnetworks. Molecular BioSystems. 2009;5:422–443. doi: 10.1039/b816714c. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hucka M, Finney A, Bornstein BJ, et al. Evolving a lingua franca and associated software infrastructure for computational systems biology: the systems biology markup language (SBML) project. Systematic Biology. 2004;1:41–53. doi: 10.1049/sb:20045008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:524–531. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg015. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hyduke DR, Lewis NE, Palsson BØ. Analysis of omics data with genome-scale models of metabolism. Molecular BioSystems. 2013;9:167–174. doi: 10.1039/c2mb25453k. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jerby L, Shlomi T, Ruppin E. Computational reconstruction of tissue-specific metabolic models: application to human liver metabolism. Molecular Systems Biology. 2010;6:401. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kamp H, Strauss V, Wiemer J, et al. Reproducibility and robustness of metabolome analysis in rat plasma of 28-day repeated dose toxicity studies. Toxicology Letters. 2012;215:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.09.015. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. 2000;28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kell DB. Metabolomics, modelling and machine learning in systems biology: towards an understanding of the languages of cells. The 2005 Theodor Bücher lecture. FEBS Journal. 2006;273:873–894. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05136.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kell DB. Systems biology, metabolic modelling and metabolomics in drug discovery and development. Drug Discovery Today. 2006;11:1085–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.10.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kell DB. Iron behaving badly: inappropriate iron chelation as a major contributor to the aetiology of vascular and other progressive inflammatory and degenerative diseases. BMC Medical Genomics. 2009;2:2. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-2-2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kell DB. Towards a unifying, systems biology understanding of large-scale cellular death and destruction caused by poorly liganded iron: parkinson’s, Huntington’s, Alzheimer’s, prions, bactericides, chemical toxicology and others as examples. Archives of Toxicology. 2010;577:825–889. doi: 10.1007/s00204-010-0577-x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kell DB. Metabolites do social networking. Nature Chemical Biology. 2011;7:7–8. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.505. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kell DB, Brown M, Davey HM, Dunn WB, Spasic I, Oliver SG. Metabolic footprinting and systems biology: the medium is the message. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2005;3:557–565. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1177. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kell DB, Darby RM, Draper J. Genomic computing: explanatory analysis of plant expression profiling data using machine learning. Plant Physiology. 2001;126:943–951. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.3.943. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kell DB, Dobson PD. The cellular uptake of pharmaceutical drugs is mainly carrier-mediated and is thus an issue not so much of biophysics but of systems biology. In: Hicks MG, Kettner C, editors. Proc Int Beilstein Symposium on Systems Chemistry. Berlin: Logos Verlag; 2009. pp. 149–168.
  • Kell DB, Dobson PD, Bilsland E, Oliver SG. The promiscuous binding of pharmaceutical drugs and their transporter-mediated uptake into cells: what we (need to) know and how we can do so. Drug Discovery Today. 2013;18:218–239. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.11.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kell DB, Dobson PD, Oliver SG. Pharmaceutical drug transport: the issues and the implications that it is essentially carrier-mediated only. Drug Discovery Today. 2011;16:704–714. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.05.010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kell, D.B., Goodacre, R. (2013). Metabolomics and systems pharmacology: why and how to model the human metabolic network for drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today. (Submitted). [PubMed]
  • Kell DB, Mendes P. The markup is the model: reasoning about systems biology models in the semantic web era. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2008;252:538–543. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.10.023. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kildegaard, H.F., Baycin-Hizal, D., Lewis, N.E., Betenbaugh, M.J. (2013). The emerging CHO systems biology era: harnessing the ‘omics revolution for biotechnology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.02.007. (Epub ahead of print). [PubMed]
  • King RD, Garrett SM, Coghill GM. On the use of qualitative reasoning to simulate and identify metabolic pathways. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2017–2026. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti255. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Knox C, Shrivastava S, Sothard P, Eisner R, Wishart DS. Biospider: a web server for automating metabolome annotations. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. 2007;12:145–156. [PubMed]
  • Kola I. The state of innovation in drug development. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2008;83:227–230. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100479. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kola I, Landis J. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2004;3:711–715. doi: 10.1038/nrd1470. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Krause F, Schulz M, Swainston N, Liebermeister W. Sustainable model building the role of standards and biological semantics. Methods in Enzymology. 2011;500:371–395. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385118-5.00019-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kwong E, Higgins J, Templeton AC. Strategies for bringing drug delivery tools into discovery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2011;412:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.03.024. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lanthaler K, Bilsland E, Dobson P, et al. Genome-wide assessment of the carriers involved in the cellular uptake of drugs: a model system in yeast. BMC Biology. 2011;9:70. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-9-70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Le Novère N, Finney A, Hucka M, et al. Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM) Nature Biotechnology. 2005;23:1509–1515. doi: 10.1038/nbt1156. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lee JW, Na D, Park JM, Lee J, Choi S, Lee SY. Systems metabolic engineering of microorganisms for natural and non-natural chemicals. Nature Chemical Biology. 2012;8:536–546. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.970. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lee D, Smallbone K, Dunn WB, et al. Improving metabolic flux predictions using absolute gene expression data. BMC Systems Biology. 2012;6:73. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Leeson PD, Empfield JR. Reducing the risk of drug attrition associated with physicochemical properties. Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry. 2010;45:393–407. doi: 10.1016/S0065-7743(10)45024-1. [Cross Ref]
  • Levandi T, Leon C, Kaljurand M, Garcia-Cañas V, Cifuentes A. Capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry for comparative metabolomics of transgenic versus conventional maize. Analytical Chemistry. 2008;80:6329–6335. doi: 10.1021/ac8006329. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Li P, Dada JO, Jameson D, et al. Systematic integration of experimental data and models in systems biology. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:582. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Li X, Gianoulis TA, Yip KY, Gerstein M, Snyder M. Extensive in vivo metabolite-protein interactions revealed by large-scale systematic analyses. Cell. 2010;143:639–650. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.048. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Li L, Li R, Zhou J, Zuniga A, et al. MyCompoundID: using an Evidence-based Metabolome Library for Metabolite Identification. Analytical Chemistry. 2013;85:3401–3408. doi: 10.1021/ac400099b. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Li P, Oinn T, Soiland S, Kell DB. Automated manipulation of systems biology models using libSBML within Taverna workflows. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:287–289. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm578. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Li X, Snyder M. Metabolites as global regulators: a new view of protein regulation: systematic investigation of metabolite-protein interactions may help bridge the gap between genome-wide association studies and small molecule screening studies. BioEssays. 2011;33:485–489. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100026. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Li M, Wang B, Zhang M, et al. Symbiotic gut microbes modulate human metabolic phenotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2008;105:2117–2122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712038105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Liebermeister W, Klipp E. Bringing metabolic networks to life: convenience rate law and thermodynamic constraints. Theoretical Biology and Medical Model. 2006;3:41. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-3-41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ma H, Sorokin A, Mazein A, et al. The Edinburgh human metabolic network reconstruction and its functional analysis. Molecular Systems Biology. 2007;3:135. doi: 10.1038/msb4100177. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mendes P, Kell DB. Non-linear optimization of biochemical pathways: applications to metabolic engineering and parameter estimation. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:869–883. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.10.869. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Miwa, M., Ohta, T., Rak, R., et al. (2013). A method for integrating and ranking the evidence for biochemical pathways by mining reactions from text. Bioinformatics. (In press). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Miwa M, Thompson P, McNaught J, Kell DB, Ananiadou S. Extracting semantically enriched events from biomedical literature. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-108. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mo ML, Palsson BO, Herrgård MJ. Connecting extracellular metabolomic measurements to intracellular flux states in yeast. BMC Systems Biology. 2009;3:37. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-3-37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Moles CG, Mendes P, Banga JR. Parameter estimation in biochemical pathways: a comparison of global optimization methods. Genome Research. 2003;13:2467–2474. doi: 10.1101/gr.1262503. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nobata C, Dobson P, Iqbal SA, et al. Mining metabolites: extracting the yeast metabolome from the literature. Metabolomics. 2011;7:94–101. doi: 10.1007/s11306-010-0251-6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • O’Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA, Morley C, Vandermeersch T, Hutchison GR. Open babel: an open chemical toolbox. Journal of Cheminformatics. 2011;3:33. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • O’Hagan S, Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, et al. Closed-loop, multi-objective optimisation of two-dimensional gas chromatography (GCxGC-tof-MS) for serum metabolomics. Analytical Chemistry. 2007;79:464–476. doi: 10.1021/ac061443+. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • O’Hagan S, Dunn WB, Brown M, Knowles JD, Kell DB. Closed-loop, multiobjective optimisation of analytical instrumentation: gas-chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry of the metabolomes of human serum and of yeast fermentations. Analytical Chemistry. 2005;77:290–303. doi: 10.1021/ac049146x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BØ. What is flux balance analysis? Nature Biotechnology. 2010;28:245–248. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1614. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Palsson BØ. Systems biology: properties of reconstructed networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
  • Park JM, Kim TY, Lee SY. Prediction of metabolic fluxes by incorporating genomic context and flux-converging pattern analyses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2010;107:14931–14936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003740107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Park JH, Lee KH, Kim TY, Lee SY. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of l-valine based on transcriptome analysis and in silico gene knockout simulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2007;104:7797–7802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702609104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Raamsdonk LM, Teusink B, Broadhurst D, et al. A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations. Nature Biotechnology. 2001;19:45–50. doi: 10.1038/83496. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ray O, Whelan K, King R. Automatic revision of metabolic networks through logical analysis of experimental data. Inductive Logic Programming. 2010;5989:194–201. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13840-9_18. [Cross Ref]
  • Reed JL, Palsson BØ. Thirteen years of building constraint-based in silico models of Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. 2003;185:2692–2699. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.9.2692-2699.2003. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sakurai N, Ara T, Kanaya S, et al. An application of a relational database system for high-throughput prediction of elemental compositions from accurate mass values. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:290–291. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts660. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Salek, R.M., Haug, K., Conesa, P., et al. (2013). The MetaboLights repository: curation challenges in metabolomics. Database, 2013, bat029. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sawada Y, Nakabayashi R, Yamada Y, et al. RIKEN tandem mass spectral database (ReSpect) for phytochemicals: a plant-specific MS/MS-based data resource and database. Phytochemistry. 2012;82:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.07.007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Shlomi T, Cabili MN, Ruppin E. Predicting metabolic biomarkers of human inborn errors of metabolism. Molecular Systems Biology. 2009;5:263. doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sigurdsson MI, Jamshidi N, Steingrimsson E, Thiele I, Palsson BØ. A detailed genome-wide reconstruction of mouse metabolism based on human Recon 1. BMC Systems Biology. 2010;4:140. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-140. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Smallbone K, Simeonidis E. Flux balance analysis: a geometric perspective. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2008;258:311–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.01.027. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Smallbone K, Simeonidis E, Broomhead DS, Kell DB. Something from nothing: bridging the gap between constraint-based and kinetic modelling. FEBS Journal. 2007;274:5576–5585. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06076.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Smallbone K, Simeonidis E, Swainston N, Mendes P. Towards a genome-scale kinetic model of cellular metabolism. BMC Systems Biology. 2010;4:6. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Steinbeck C, Conesa P, Haug K, et al. MetaboLights: towards a new COSMOS of metabolomics data management. Metabolomics. 2012;8:757–760. doi: 10.1007/s11306-012-0462-0. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Steinbeck C, Han Y, Kuhn S, Horlacher O, Luttmann E, Willighagen E. The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): an open-source Java library for Chemo-and Bioinformatics. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 2003;43:493–500. doi: 10.1021/ci025584y. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Swainston N, Mendes P. libAnnotationSBML: a library for exploiting SBML annotations. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2292–2293. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp392. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Swainston N, Smallbone K, Mendes P, Kell D, Paton N. The SuBliMinaL toolbox: automating steps in the reconstruction of metabolic networks. Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics. 2011;8:186. [PubMed]
  • Tautenhahn R, Cho K, Uritboonthai W, Zhu ZJ, Patti GJ, Siuzdak G. An accelerated workflow for untargeted metabolomics using the METLIN database. Nature Biotechnology. 2012;30:826–828. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2348. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Thiele I, Hyduke DR, Steeb B, et al. A community effort towards a knowledge-base and mathematical model of the human pathogen Salmonella typhimurium LT2. BMC Systems Biology. 2011;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Thiele I, Palsson BØ. Reconstruction annotation jamborees: a community approach to systems biology. Molecular Systems Biology. 2010;6:361. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Thiele I, Swainston N, Fleming RMT, et al. A community-driven global reconstruction of human metabolism. Nature Biotechnology. 2013;31:419–425. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2488. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Uhlén M, Oksvold P, Fagerberg L, et al. Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas. Nature Biotechnology. 2010;28:1248–1250. doi: 10.1038/nbt1210-1248. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • van der Greef J, McBurney RN. Rescuing drug discovery: in vivo systems pathology and systems pharmacology. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2005;4:961–967. doi: 10.1038/nrd1904. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • van Ravenzwaay B, Herold M, Kamp H, et al. Metabolomics: a tool for early detection of toxicological effects and an opportunity for biology based grouping of chemicals-from QSAR to QBAR. Mutation Research. 2012;746:144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.01.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang Y, Eddy JA, Price ND. Reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic models for 126 human tissues using mCADRE. BMC Systems Biology. 2012;6:153. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-153. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang Z, Klipfell E, Bennett BJ, et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011;472:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nature09922. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wikoff WR, Anfora AT, Liu J, et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2009;106:3698–3703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812874106. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wishart DS. Chapter 3: small molecules and disease. PLoS Computational Biology. 2012;8:e1002805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002805. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wishart DS, Jewison T, Guo AC, et al. HMDB 3.0–The Human Metabolome Database in 2013. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41:D801–D807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1065. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wishart DS, Tzur D, Knox C, et al. HMDB: the Human Metabolome Database. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;35:D521–D526. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl923. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zelena E, Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, et al. Development of a robust and repeatable UPLC-MS method for the long-term metabolomic study of human serum. Analytical Chemistry. 2009;81:1357–1364. doi: 10.1021/ac8019366. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhao L, Shen J. Whole-body systems approaches for gut microbiota-targeted, preventive healthcare. Journal of Biotechnology. 2010;149:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.02.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhou B, Wang J, Ressom HW. MetaboSearch: tool for mass-based metabolite identification using multiple databases. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040096. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Springer Open Choice are provided here courtesy of Springer
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...