pmc logo image
Logo of pnasPNAS Home page.Reference to the article.PNAS Info for AuthorsPNAS SubscriptionsPNAS About

Formats:

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 August; 77(8): 4784–4787.
PMCID: PMC349931
In utero analysis of sister chromatid exchange: alterations in suscptibility to mutagenic damage as a function of fetal cell type and gestational age.
D Kram, G D Bynum, G C Senula, C K Bickings, and E L Schneider
Abstract
Frequencies of baseline and cyclophosphamide-induced sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) were measured in mouse maternal and fetal cells between days 11 and 19 of gestation. Baseline levels of SCE did not vary as a function of gestational age in either the mother or fetus. Cyclophosphamide-induced SCE frequencies remained constant in maternal cells but declined dramatically in the fetus throughout the latter half of development. Because cyclophosphamide is a metabolically activated mutagen, a direct-acting drug, mitomycin C, was given on days 11 and 15 to determine if the decline in induced SCE levels seen with gestational results from alterations in activating enzymes. A similar decline in mitomycin C-induced SCE levels was noted in fetal tissues as a function of gestational age. Dose-response curves to cyclophosphamide performed on day 13 of gestation showed increases in SCE as a function of cyclophosphamide concentration in both the mother and the fetus. When mutagen-induced SCE levels were compared in different fetal organs, the direct-acting drugs (mitomycin C and daunomycin) were found to induce similar levels in all tissues. Cyclophosphamide, which is metabolically activated, induced higher SCE levels in fetal liver than in lung or gut. Whereas cyclophosphamide induced similar SCE levels in fetal and maternal cells on day 13 of gestation, daunomycin produced fetal SCE levels that were approximately 50% of maternal levels. Simultaneous measurement of the distribution of [14C]cyclophosphamide and [3H]daunomycin in maternal and fetal cells revealed that the lower SCE induction by daunomycin was probably due to decreased ability to cross the placental barrier.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (735K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Kram D, Bynum GD, Senula GC, Schneider EL. In utero sister chromatid exchange analysis for detection of transplacental mutagens. Nature. 1979 Jun 7;279(5713):531. [PubMed]
  • Basler A. Sister chromatid exchanges in vivo in Chinese hamster embryonic liver cells exposed transplacentally to BrdU. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1979;24(3):193–196. [PubMed]
  • Knuutila S, Harkki A, Rossi L, Westermarck T, Lappalainen L, Rantanen P. In vivo method for sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster foetal and bone marrow cells. Hereditas. 1979;91(1):23–26. [PubMed]
  • Perry P, Evans HJ. Cytological detection of mutagen-carcinogen exposure by sister chromatid exchange. Nature. 1975 Nov 13;258(5531):121–125. [PubMed]
  • Abe S, Sasaki M. Chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster cells exposed to various chemicals. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977 Jun;58(6):1635–1641. [PubMed]
  • Allen JW, Latt SA. Analysis of sister chromatid exchange formation in vivo in mouse spermatogonia as a new test system for environmental mutagens. Nature. 1976 Apr 1;260(5550):449–451. [PubMed]
  • Stetka DG, Wolff S. Sister chromatid exchange as an assay for genetic damage induced by mutagen-carcinogens. II. In vitro test for compounds requiring metabolic activation. Mutat Res. 1976 Dec;41(2-3):343–350. [PubMed]
  • Carrano AV, Thompson LH, Lindl PA, Minkler JL. Sister chromatid exchange as an indicator of mutagenesis. Nature. 1978 Feb 9;271(5645):551–553. [PubMed]
  • Nakanishi Y, Schneider EL. In vivo sister-chromatid exchange: a sensitive measure of DNA damage. Mutat Res. 1979 May;60(3):329–337. [PubMed]
  • DiPaolo JA, Kotin P. Teratogenesis-oncogenesis: a study of possible relationships. Arch Pathol. 1966 Jan;81(1):3–23. [PubMed]
  • Schneider EL, Chaillet JR, Tice RR. In vivo BUdR labeling of mammalian chromosomes. Exp Cell Res. 1976 Jul;100(2):396–399. [PubMed]
  • Schneider EL, Tice RR, Kram D. Bromodeoxyuridine differential chromatid staining technique: a new approach to examining sister chromatid exchange and cell replication kinetics. Methods Cell Biol. 1978;20:379–409. [PubMed]
  • Lin MS, Alfi OS. Detection of sister chromatid exchanges by 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole fluorescence. Chromosoma. 1976 Sep 10;57(3):219–225. [PubMed]
  • Schneider EL, Mitsui Y, Au KS, Shorr SS. Tissue-specific differences in cultured human diploid fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1977 Aug;108(1):1–6. [PubMed]
  • Brock N, Hohorst HJ. Metabolism of cyclophosphamide. Cancer. 1967 May;20(5):900–904. [PubMed]
  • Harbison Raymond D. Chemical-biological reactions common to teratogenesis and mutagenesis. Environ Health Perspect. 1978 Jun;24:87–100. [PubMed]
  • Bolande RP. Neoplasia of early life and its relationships to teratogenesis. Perspect Pediatr Pathol. 1976;3:145–183. [PubMed]
  • Gibson JE, Becker BA. The teratogenicity of cyclophosphamide in mice. Cancer Res. 1968 Mar;28(3):475–480. [PubMed]