Logo of pnasPNASInfo for AuthorsSubscriptionsAboutThis Article
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 19; 98(13): 7540–7545.
Published online 2001 Jun 12. doi:  10.1073/pnas.131201098

Light regulation of type IV pilus-dependent motility by chemosensor-like elements in Synechocystis PCC6803


To optimize photosynthesis, cyanobacteria move toward or away from a light source by a process known as phototaxis. Phototactic movement of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803 is a surface-dependent phenomenon that requires type IV pili, cellular appendages implicated in twitching and social motility in a range of bacteria. To elucidate regulation of cyanobacterial motility, we generated transposon-tagged mutants with aberrant phototaxis; mutants were either nonmotile or exhibited an “inverted motility response” (negative phototaxis) relative to wild-type cells. Several mutants contained transposons in genes similar to those involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Synechocystis PCC6803 has three loci with chemotaxis-like genes, of which two, Tax1 and Tax3, are involved in phototaxis. Transposons interrupting the Tax1 locus yielded mutants that exhibited an inverted motility response, suggesting that this locus is involved in controlling positive phototaxis. However, a strain null for taxAY1 was nonmotile and hyperpiliated. Interestingly, whereas the C-terminal region of the TaxD1 polypeptide is similar to the signaling domain of enteric methyl-accepting chemoreceptor proteins, the N terminus has two domains resembling chromophore-binding domains of phytochrome, a photoreceptor in plants. Hence, TaxD1 may play a role in perceiving the light stimulus. Mutants in the Tax3 locus are nonmotile and do not make type IV pili. These findings establish links between chemotaxis-like regulatory elements and type IV pilus-mediated phototaxis.

Swimming of bacteria in liquid by means of flagella is well characterized. Gliding and twitching motility on solid surfaces are less well understood forms of locomotion exhibited by many Gram-negative bacteria (1, 2). This mode of slow translocation usually requires surface appendages known as type IV pili (Tfp), which are defined by structural, morphological, and antigenic properties (3). The capacity of Tfp to retract or extend may enable cells to move (4). There is also growing evidence that Tfp are multifunctional, participating in a variety of processes including transformation competence, secretion, and attachment to host receptors (5, 6).

Tfp biogenesis has been studied in Myxococcus xanthus and the pathogenic microorganisms Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Vibrio cholerae, and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Whereas genes required for Tfp biogenesis have been identified in these organisms (710), little is understood about the regulation of Tfp biogenesis. Social motility in M. xanthus appears to require chemotaxis-like genes (che genes encoding Che polypeptides); their exact role in regulating this process is unclear (1113).

Limited aspects of motility have been described for cyanobacteria (14, 15). Filamentous gliding cyanobacteria, major components of microbial mats and biofilms, require contact with a solid surface and, in certain species, the extracellular glycoprotein, oscillin, for motility (16). An outer membrane protein with features similar to that of oscillin is required for swimming of the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus WH8102 (17).

Recent studies have demonstrated that the cell surface of the freshwater unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803 (Synechocystis throughout) has a dense covering of pilus-like appendages of two distinct morpho-types. The thick pilus morpho-type (6–8 Å in diameter) is required for motility and represents Tfp (18). The thin pilus morpho-type (3–4 Å in diameter) is shorter than Tfp and uniformly covers the cell surface. The function(s) of thin pili are not known.

Light is a key environmental cue that regulates cyanobacterial motility. Cyanobacteria, as well as other photosynthetic bacteria, exhibit at least three movement responses relative to light: phototaxis [orientation of cells with respect to the direction of light and subsequent movement either toward (positive) or away (negative) from the light], photophobic movement, and photokinesis (14, 19). We have recently isolated numerous mutants with aberrant phototactic movement. Several of the mutants harbored transposons in che-like genes, which are well studied with respect to flagellar-based movement but have only recently been implicated in controlling Tfp-based motility (12, 13, 20). The phenotypes of the phototaxis mutants suggest that Che-like polypeptides control both cell orientation with respect to light and pilus biosynthesis.

Experimental Procedures

Culture and Growth Conditions and Motility Assays.

The motile strain of Synechocystis was grown in BG-11 medium in light of 50–70 μmol photons m−2 s−1. When appropriate, antibiotics were included in the medium at a final concentration of 25 μg/ml spectinomycin, 10 μg/ml kanamycin, or 25 μg/ml chloramphenicol. Motility was assayed with incandescent light (intensity at the colony surface ≈40 μmol photons m−2 s−1), as previously described (18).

DNA Manipulation, RNA Isolation, and RNA Hybridization Analysis.

Molecular techniques were performed according to standard procedures (21), and RNA was isolated as described (22).

Genomic Library Preparation, Transposon Mutagenesis, and Direct Genomic Sequencing.

A Synechocystis genomic library was constructed that contained 105 clones with inserts of 4–9 kbp (23). The library was subjected to in vitro transposon mutagenesis (protocol of Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI) and then transformed into wild-type Synechocystis cells. Following transformation, cells were spread on 0.4% or 0.6% BG-11 agar plates (10 μg kanamycin/ml) and placed in a directional light source. Colonies that were nonmotile or exhibited an inverted response were picked and rescreened. To define the transposon insertion site, genomic DNA was isolated from mutants by using the QIAGEN DNA Easy Kit, and purified DNA was sequenced from the transposon borders with ABI Big Dye Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Perkin–Elmer) and RP1 or FP1 primers (Epicentre Technologies). Sequence information identified the site of the transposon insertion (Cyanobase, http://www.kazusa.or.jp/cyano/).

Gene Inactivations.

Genes of interest were amplified (using specific primers) from genomic DNA by using High Fidelity Taq polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega), and disrupted with an antibiotic marker cassette; plasmid DNA containing the interrupted gene was then transformed into Synechocystis (18). For inactivation of taxAY1 at the 5′ end (mutant taxAY1-5′), the gene was amplified by PCR (primers 5′-ATGCTCAACTCCGACATT and 5′-TTAACTGCTGACCGATAA), cloned into pGEM-T vector, and disrupted by excising an internal, 3.41-kbp BglII fragment from the coding region of the gene and replacing the fragment with a cassette conferring chloramphenicol resistance. To inactivate taxAY1 at the 3′ end, in the region encoding the CheY-like domain (mutant taxAY1-3′), a PCR fragment was generated using primers 5′-TTGACCGCCGATGAACTG and 5′-CAGTTCATCGGCGGTCAA to amplify a 2.17-kbp fragment. A cassette conferring spectinomycin resistance was ligated into the unique BglII site of this fragment. The taxD1 gene was PCR amplified using primers 5′-ATGGCAGAGGCTTTTATAGCA and 5′-TCACTGCACTTTGAACTG and cloned into the pGEM-T vector. For inactivation of taxD1, a cassette conferring spectinomycin resistance was ligated into the unique SmaI site of the 2.68-kbp PCR fragment cloned into pGEM-T vector. The taxAY3 gene was amplified with the primers 5′-ATGACTAGCGATCCCAAT and 5′-TTACTCGTCTGCTGCACTTAG and cloned into the pGEM-T vector. An inactivation that would disrupt the protein at the N terminus was created by insertion of the spectinomycin cassette into a unique EcoRI site.

Vectors containing the gene disruptions were transformed into Synechocystis by selecting for antibiotic resistance (22). Genomic DNA from transformants was isolated and analyzed by PCR to ensure that all chromosomal copies of the targeted gene were disrupted.

Electron Microscopy.

Electron microscopy was performed with a Phillips CM410 microscope, as described (18).


Cells were mutagenized by in vitro transposon mutagenesis, and 300 motility mutants from 8,000 transformants were identified. Ninety percent of these were nonmotile, whereas 10% exhibited an inverted motility response (or negative phototaxis) relative to wild-type cells. To identify sites of transposon insertions, we sequenced genomic DNA using primers that anneal to the ends of the transposon–kanamycin cassette. Many genes required for pilus biogenesis or function were identified, including those encoding polypeptides with a coiled coil structure, chaperones, and ABC transporters (refs. 10, 24, and 25; D.B. and A.R.G, unpublished results). Several mutants harbored insertions in genes encoding Che-like polypeptides; these polypeptides control flagellar-based movement of bacteria in response to environmental signals.

The genome of Synechocystis contains three loci encoding putative Che-like proteins. Each locus, designated Tax1, Tax2, and Tax3, contains a cluster of genes arranged in a similar manner (Fig. (Fig.11A). The Tax designation is more general than that of Che and reflects the finding that genes within two of the Synechocystis loci are involved in phototaxis. The Tax1 locus has six ORFs (Cyanobase designation sll0038–sll0043) ordered taxP1-taxY1-taxW1-taxD1-taxD′-taxAY1. The Tax2 locus has five ORFs (sll1291–sll1295) ordered taxP2-taxY2-taxW2-taxD2-taxAY2. The Tax3 locus has four ORFs (slr1041–slr1045) ordered taxP3-taxY3-taxW3-taxD3. A separate taxAY gene (sll0322), designated taxAY3 (based on the phenotype of the mutant strain; see below), is located in another region of the chromosome. Specific ORFs not similar to known Che proteins, but included in Fig. Fig.11A, are immediately downstream and in the same orientation on the genome as the tax genes: sll0044 in the Tax1 locus, sll1297 in the Tax2 locus, and slr1046/1047 in the Tax3 locus. We have given a taxP designation to the first gene in each of the three Tax loci because these putative taxP genes encode polypeptides that are ≈25% identical (40% similar) to each other and contain C-terminal sequences similar to the regulatory CheY protein (about 33% identity and 52% similarity). Also, one of the inverted response mutants contained a transposon in taxP1, suggesting a function for TaxP1 in motility. TaxP polypeptides are part of a family of proteins in Synechocystis, with at least three other homologs encoded on the genome (slr1693, slr1214, and slr1594). They show homology to PatA, which is involved in heterocyst development and pattern formation in the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Anabaena (26).

Figure 1
(A) Physical map of Tax loci showing three Tax loci (Tax1, Tax 2, and Tax3) and taxAY3. Arrowheads indicate the position of transposons that map to specific tax genes. (Bar, 200 amino acids or 600 nucleotides.) (B) Directional motility assays. Cells were ...

Of the 50 mutants analyzed, transposons in 15 were localized to Tax loci (Fig. (Fig.11A). Insertions in taxP1, taxD1, taxAY1, and between taxW1 and taxD1 were identified in strains with an inverted response phenotype. All of the insertions within taxAY1 were in the 3′ end of the gene (nucleotide positions 2174, 2475, 2941, and 3670), which would disrupt the C-terminal portion of the polypeptide. All seven strains disrupted for taxAY3 and taxD3 were nonmotile.

To confirm transposon mutant phenotypes, we insertionally inactivated taxD1, taxAY1, taxD2, taxAY2, and taxAY3. Furthermore, because the transposons only disrupted taxAY1 at its 3′ end, possibly not resulting in a null mutation, we introduced individual targeted insertions into the 3′ and 5′ ends of the taxAY1 coding region. The motility of these strains is shown in Fig. Fig.11B. The taxAY1-3′ and taxD1 mutants exhibited an inverted response (Fig. (Fig.11B, ,33 and and4).4). In contrast, the taxAY1-5′ mutant exhibited a nonmotile phenotype (Fig. (Fig.11B, ,2),2), suggesting two separable activities associated with the TaxAY1 protein. Distinct phenotypes of cyanobacterial strains with 5′ and 3′ disruptions of rcaE, which encodes a sensor that controls the responses of a filamentous cyanobacterium to light quality, have also been noted (27).

Figure 2
(A) Diagram of TaxAY histidine kinases showing the different domains (P1–P5) and the CheY-like domains (dotted boxes). CheA from E. coli is shown in line 1; numbers in parentheses represent protein size in amino acids. Black bar in P1 represents ...
Figure 3
Comparison of phytochrome-like domains of TaxD1 (phy1 and phy2) with chromophore-binding domain of phytochrome E of Arabidopsis thaliana (PhyE, 181–358) and RcaE (89) of Fremyella diplosiphon. phy1 (210) and phy2 (376) are shown on lines 1 and ...
Figure 4
Transmission electron micrographs of wild-type (A), taxAY1-3′ (B), taxAY1-5′ (C), and taxAY3 (D) null mutants. Cells were stained with 1% uranyl acetate, and cell edge with pili is shown at a final magnification of 112,500.

No transposon insertions in the Tax2 locus were identified in the mutant collection. Furthermore, targeted disruption of taxD2 or taxAY2 caused no marked change in the motility of the cells (data not shown).

Seven transposon insertions within the taxAY3 and taxD3 genes yielded nonmotile mutants (Fig. (Fig.11B, ,55 and and6),6), which was confirmed by a targeted inactivation of taxAY3 (at the 5′ end). Although a gene encoding an α-mannosidase (sll0323) is located downstream of taxAY3, it is unlikely that the nonmotile phenotype is caused by a downstream polar effect, as both the kanamycin cassette (which has no terminator) and the targeted inactivation yielded a nonmotile phenotype.

Figure 5
Northern blot hybridizations. (Upper) RNA from wild-type (lane 1), taxAY1-3′ (lane 2), taxAY1-5′ (lane 3), taxD1 (lane 4), taxAY3 (lane 5), and taxD3 (lane 6) mutants was probed with pilA1 gene-specific probe. Ten micrograms total RNA ...
Figure 6
Regulation of Tfp-mediated motility through chemosensor-like elements. Gray boxes represent mutants that show the inverted response, circles represent nonmotile mutants that have Tfp, and white boxes represent nonmotile mutants lacking Tfp. The black ...

The domain structure of the putative TaxAY polypeptides is shown in Fig. Fig.22A (for a detailed comparison of TaxAY polypeptides see ftp://carnegiedpb.stanford.edu/pub/TaxAY-comparisons.pdf). All three of the Synechocystis taxA genes encode histidine kinases fused at their C termini to CheY-like domains; TaxAY3 has two CheY-like domains. The fused CheY-like domains are homologous to each other and to the independent, putative CheY-like polypeptides encoded by taxY1, taxY2, and taxY3 (≈30% identity and 50% similarity). In addition, all have the highly conserved aspartate that undergoes phosphorylation. The P1 domain, which contains the autophosphorylatable histidine, is well conserved in TaxAY1 and TaxAY2 but not in TaxAY3; TaxAY3 appears to completely lack the H box. Interestingly, TaxAY1 contains a duplication of the P1 and P2 domains (P1′ and P2′) and also contains a glutamate/proline-rich insertion of 140 aa between P2 and the dimerization domain (P3). The P2 domain, presumed to interact with CheY, shows moderate homology among the TaxAY polypeptides and CheA from E. coli. The P3 domain is also conserved among TaxAY polypeptides and E. coli CheA, although the TaxAY polypeptides have a ≈70-aa insertion within this domain. The P4 and P5 domains, required for kinase activity, and receptor coupling and CheW binding, respectively, are well conserved among all of the polypeptides.

A diagram of the Synechocystis putative TaxD polypeptides is shown in Fig. Fig.22B. All three TaxD polypeptides have C-termini with strong similarity to the canonical signaling domain of methyl-accepting chemoreceptors (30–35% identity, 50–60% similarity) and contain the highly conserved signaling domain, known to be important for interactions of methyl-accepting chemoreceptors with both CheA and CheW (2830). TaxD′ is a truncated version of TaxD1, containing only a portion of the C terminus signaling domain. The N-terminal domains of the TaxD polypeptides, which carry sensing specific information, are significantly different. The two putative transmembrane helices are positioned differently in each of the polypeptides, such that each one has a variable region that is probably intracellular; TaxD2 may also have a large periplasmic domain. A putative HAMP domain has been identified in TaxD2, which may be involved in regulating phosphorylation or methylation of homodimeric receptors (31). TaxD1 has two domains (phy1 and phy2) that are similar to chromophore-binding domains of plant and bacterial phytochromes (Fig. Fig.3)3) (27, 32). The phy1 domain of TaxD1 does not have the conserved cysteine residue that is chromophorylated in plant phytochromes but does contain a histidine that may bind a chromophore (33). The phy2 domain has the conserved bilin-attached cysteine, as well as the potential chromophore-binding histidine residue of phy1. Phy domains in cyanobacterial and vascular plant phytochromes have also been named GAF domains (in the Pfam database, http://pfam.wustl.edu/) because they are part of a larger family of sequences present in a number of polypeptides including cGMP-specific phosphodiesterases, Anabaena adenylate cyclases, and E. coli FhlA (34).

In addition to exhibiting aberrant motility, a number of the mutants are abnormal for the extent of piliation (Fig. (Fig.4).4). As shown in Fig. Fig.44B, a mutant in taxAY1 that disrupts only the TaxY-encoding sequence (taxAY1-3′) has normal levels of pili and is indistinguishable from wild-type cells. In contrast, a disruption of the taxAY1-5′ end (null mutation) causes hyperpiliation (Fig. (Fig.44C). The hyperpiliation phenotype is very similar to that observed in the pilT1 mutant and appears to involve elevated production of Tfp but not thin pili. Interestingly, the nonmotile taxAY3 and taxD3 mutants exhibit a complete loss of Tfp but not thin pili (Fig. (Fig.44D). This phenotype resembles that of the pilA1 mutant (18).

We also examined taxD and taxAY mutants for expression of pilA1, the gene encoding the major pilin subunit of Tfp. As shown in Fig. Fig.55, the taxAY1-3′ mutant has normal levels of pilA1 mRNA, whereas a taxAY1-5′ mutant exhibited about a 5-fold increase in the level of pilA1 mRNA. This increase is in accord with the hyperpiliation phenotype of the mutant and is very similar to the increase in pilA1 mRNA observed in the nonmotile, hyperpiliated pilT1 mutant (18). Inactivation of either taxAY3 or taxD3 did not alter the level of pilA1 mRNA, suggesting that the loss of Tfp is not the result of a decrease in pilA1 mRNA but is possibly because of posttranscriptional control of Tfp biogenesis.


We have described Synechocystis mutants, generated by in vitro transposon mutagenesis, that are aberrant for motility. The mutagenesis technique and screen used in this study offer several advantages. Mutant identification involves a simple visual screen and can be easily modified to examine responses of wild-type and mutant strains to different light qualities and intensities. Based on Southern blot analyses, all of the mutants generated had a single transposon insertion (none had multiple insertions). The screen requires that the cells grow robustly, making the isolation of slow-growing strains, which can resemble nonmotile mutants, unlikely. Because the entire Synechocystis genome has been sequenced, identifying the altered gene is easy. Finally, the phenotype of any mutant identified by the screen can be confirmed by targeting specific mutations.

Characterization of 50 mutants yielded 15 strains defective for genes encoding Che-like components in the Tax1 and Tax3 loci. Interestingly, all three taxA genes have 3′ ends encoding domains with high similarity to CheY response regulators. taxAY gene fusions are also present on the genomes of P. aeruginosa, M. xanthus, and Rhodospirillum centenum (35, 36). The three taxAY genes of Synechocystis encode typical class II histidine kinases (37, 38), although there are some interesting variations among these polypeptides. TaxAY1 has a duplication of the P1 and P2 domains, which is unique among class II histidine kinases, and suggests that there may be more than one site on this polypeptide that undergoes phosphorylation and that this polypeptide may serve multiple roles in regulating phototaxis. Furthermore, there is a unique proline- and glutamine-rich linker region that connects P2 to the dimerization domain, which may facilitate protein–protein interactions or bending.

In addition to the TaxY domains of TaxAY polypeptides, there are three separate, putative TaxY polypeptides encoded in the Tax loci. These, in addition to the TaxY domains associated with C-termini of the putative TaxP polypeptides, brings the total number of CheY-like sequences encoded by the Tax loci to ten. This raises obvious questions concerning the roles of the several TaxY regulatory domains in the signaling pathways. It has been suggested that multiple CheY elements can serve as sinks for phosphate being transferred among the signal transduction elements, which may obviate the need for a specific phosphatase in the control of taxis responses (39, 40). Interestingly, no gene encoding a CheZ-like phosphatase has been identified on the Synechocystis genome.

There are at least three taxD-like genes on the Synechocystis genome. The taxD1 mutant exhibited an inverted response, suggesting that (i) the mutant colony still responds to directional light, but its response is inverted with respect to wild-type cells, or that (ii) the response of the mutant has been sensitized to light, exhibiting a photophobic response even in low intensity light. Hence, TaxD1 is required for forward motility, and when it or other components of this pathway are missing, the default pathway (inverted response) is unmasked. If TaxD1 plays a photosensing role in taxis (as suggested by the phytochrome-like domains at its N terminus), it must be involved in orienting cells with respect to the light direction. However, there is likely to be a second photoreceptor that interfaces with the phototaxis machinery because the cells are still orienting with respect to light direction, but in the inverted orientation (Fig. (Fig.6).6). Interestingly, the inverted response observed in the taxD1 mutant is most prominent when the cells are exposed to red light (D.B. and A.R.G., unpublished data), suggesting the involvement of another phytochrome-like photoreceptor in phototaxis. Recently, bacterial phytochrome-like molecules have been associated with a number of different light-dependent processes including phototaxis in Synechocystis (4144). Furthermore, there are other Che-like polypeptides involved in light-responsive motility. HtrI and HtrII are Che-like signaling molecules that interact with the rhodopsin-based photoreceptors SRI and SRII, respectively, to control flagellar-based motility in halobacteria (45).

The taxD3 and taxAY3 mutants are nonmotile, suggesting that the Tax1 and Tax3 loci encode elements of independent pathways, both of which are required for phototaxis. EM data demonstrate that both taxD3 and taxAY3 mutants lack Tfp, although levels of pilA1 mRNA are normal. This suggests that TaxD3 and TaxAY3 are required for Tfp biogenesis at a posttranscriptional level, although the exact roles of these regulatory elements in pilus biogenesis and the signals that modulate the activities of this pathway are not known.

We have attempted to synthesize motility phenotypes, EM data, and information concerning expression of pilA1 in mutant and wild-type cells into a preliminary, speculative model that describes the control of phototaxis by Tax proteins (Fig. (Fig.6).6). In this model, the phy domains of TaxD1 bind to linear tetrapyrrole chromophores and the holoprotein absorbs light. This putative photoreceptor enables the cells to sense the direction and/or intensity of light, which establishes directional movement. Depending on light conditions, TaxD1 may interact with TaxAY1, perhaps via the scaffold molecule TaxW1. This light-sensitized interaction may promote autophosphorylation of TaxAY1 at the conserved histidine residue of the H box, which is followed by phosphorylation of the fused CheY-like domain. This phosphorylation cascade may ultimately read to PilT2, resulting in positive orientation of the cells with respect to the direction of illumination. Mutants null for TaxD1, the CheY-like domain of TaxAY1, and PilT2 (18) exhibit the inverted response. Hence, all of these polypeptides are absolutely required for positive phototaxis. However, we have also observed that a taxAY1 null mutant is nonmotile and shows hyperpiliation and elevated expression of pilA1. These phenotypes are identical to those exhibited by the pilT1 mutant (18). Hence, we suggest that TaxAY1 is multifunctional and that its P1′–P2′ and/or P1–P2 domains read to PilT1, possibly through the mobile TaxY1 polypeptide. PilT1, in turn, is critical for pilus function and for controlling expression of the pilA1 gene. The elevated pilA1 mRNA levels in the taxAY1 null mutant may be an indirect effect of the lesion; when cells assemble nonfunctional pili, the pilA1 gene may become derepressed. Hence, the bifurcated pathway for light regulation may control both the direction of motility (through the PilT2 branch) as well as the function and regulation of pilus levels through the PilT1 branch.

Our results indicate that Tax3 genes may be required for Tfp biogenesis, although no mechanistic aspects of this involvement are known. We have placed TaxD3 and TaxAY3 on a pathway, independent of Tax1 polypeptides, that is critical for Tfp biogenesis. It is striking that the conserved histidine residue presumed to be autophosphorylated in the TaxAY1 and TaxAY2 is absent in TaxAY3. So far, there have been no reports indicating the involvement of chemotaxis components in flagellar biosynthesis. However, there are now several reports suggesting that polypeptides of chemosensing pathways in E. coli are arranged in large, localized clusters (46, 47). Assembly specifically requires chemosensors, dimeric CheA, as well as CheW (4749), although this has not been evaluated in cyanobacteria. Tfp biogenesis may be dependent on the correct assembly of the chemosensory complex. Clustering of chemosensors and perhaps Tfp may allow for (i) global receptor methylation and integration of diverse environmental signals, (ii) an increase in the efficiency of transmitting signals to the motor apparatus, and (iii) signal amplification (29, 50).

The model presented above is based on limited data; more information must be incorporated into the model to clarify the role of some of the signaling components. For example, arrows have been drawn directly from TaxAY1 to PilT2 and from TaxAY1 to TaxY1 and PilT1; there is no evidence at this point to suggest that these interactions are direct. However, the model provides a framework for designing experiments to test the validity of the regulatory events proposed and to precisely define circuits involved in controlling both the biosynthesis and function of Tfp.


We have benefited from the excellent technical assistance of Nafisa Ghori, Glenn Ford, and Erin Desing. This work was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant MCB 9727836 (to A.R.G.). This is Carnegie Institution of Washington publication number 1475.


Tfptype IV pili


1. Spormann A. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63:621–641. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Youderian P. Curr Biol. 1998;8:R408–R411. [PubMed]
3. Strom M S, Lory S. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1993;47:565–596. [PubMed]
4. Merz A J, So M, Sheetz M P. Nature (London) 2000;407:98–102. [PubMed]
5. Dubnau D. Gene. 1997;192:191–198. [PubMed]
6. Russel M. J Mol Biol. 1998;279:485–499. [PubMed]
7. Tennent J M, Mattick J S. In: Fimbriae. Klemm P, editor. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 1994. pp. 127–146.
8. Bieber D, Ramer S W, Wu C Y, Murray W J, Tobe T, Fernandez R, Schoolnik G K. Science. 1998;280:2114–2118. [PubMed]
9. Semmler A B, Whitchurch C B, Mattick J S. Microbiology. 1999;145:2863–2873. [PubMed]
10. Wall D, Kaiser D. Mol Microbiol. 1999;32:1–10. [PubMed]
11. Cho K, Treuner-Lange A, O'Connor K A, Zusman D R. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:6614–6621. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Yang Z, Geng Y, Xu D, Kaplan H B, Shi W. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30:1123–1130. [PubMed]
13. Ward M J, Zusman D R. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999;2:624–629. [PubMed]
14. Hader D P. In: The Cyanobacteria. Fay P, VanBaalen C, editors. New York: Elsevier; 1987. pp. 325–346.
15. Hoiczyk E. Arch Microbiol. 2000;174:11–17. [PubMed]
16. Hoiczyk E, Baumeister W. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26:699–708. [PubMed]
17. Brahamsha B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:6504–6509. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Bhaya D, Bianco N R, Bryant D, Grossman A. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37:941–951. [PubMed]
19. Armitage J P. In: Microbial Responses to Light and Time. Caddick M X, editor. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press; 1998. pp. 33–55.
20. Sun H, Zusman D R, Shi W. Curr Biol. 2000;10:1143–1146. [PubMed]
21. Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1989.
22. Bhaya D, Watanabe N, Ogawa T, Grossman A R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:3188–3193. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Kehoe D, Grossman A. Methods Enzymol. 1999;297:279–290.
24. Ward M J, Lew H, Zusman D R. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37:1357–1371. [PubMed]
25. Ward M J, Mok K C, Astling D P, Lew H, Zusman D R. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:5697–5703. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Liang J, Scappino L, Haselkorn R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5655–5659. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Kehoe D M, Grossman A R. Science. 1996;273:1409–1412. [PubMed]
28. Levit M, Liu Y, Stock J. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30:459–466. [PubMed]
29. Stock J, Levit N. Curr Biol. 2000;10:R11–R14. [PubMed]
30. Falke J J, Bass R B, Butler S L, Chervitz S A, Danielson M A. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997;13:457–512. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Aravind L, Ponting C P. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;176:111–116. [PubMed]
32. Vierstra R D, Davis S J. Semin Cell Div Biol. 2000;11:511–521. [PubMed]
33. Davis S J, Vener A V, Vierstra R D. Science. 1999;286:2517–2520. [PubMed]
34. Aravind L, Ponting C P. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997;22:458–459. [PubMed]
35. McCleary W R, Zusman D R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:5898–5902. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Jiang Z-Y, Bauer C E. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:5712–5719. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Dutta R, Qin L, Inouye M. Mol Microbiol. 1999;34:633–640. [PubMed]
38. Bilwes A M, Alex L A, Crane B R, Simon M I. Cell. 1999;96:131–142. [PubMed]
39. Sourjik V, Schmitt R. Biochemistry. 1998;37:2327–2335. [PubMed]
40. Shah D S H, Porter S L, Martin A C, Hamblin P A, Armitage J P. EMBO J. 2000;19:4601–4613. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Yeh K C, Wu S-H, Murphy J T, Lagarias J C. Science. 1997;277:1505–1508. [PubMed]
42. Zhulin I B. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;2:491–493. [PubMed]
43. Jiang Z-Y, Swem L R, Rushing B G, Devanathan S, Tollin G, Bauer C E. Science. 1999;285:406–409. [PubMed]
44. Yoshihara S, Suzuki F, Fujita H, Geng X, Ikeuchi M. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000;41:1299–1304. [PubMed]
45. Hoff W D, Jung K-H, Spudich J L. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1997;26:223–258. [PubMed]
46. Maddock J R, Shapiro L. Science. 1993;259:1717–1723. [PubMed]
47. Sourjik V, Berg H C. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37:740–751. [PubMed]
48. Skidmore J, Ellefson D D, McNamara B P, Couto M M P, Wolfe A J, Maddock J R. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:967–973. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Wadhams G H, Martin A C, Armitage J P. Mol Microbiol. 2000;36:1222–1233. [PubMed]
50. Duke T A, Bray D. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:10104–10108. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences
PubReader format: click here to try


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem chemical substance records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records.
  • Taxonomy
    Taxonomy records associated with the current articles through taxonomic information on related molecular database records (Nucleotide, Protein, Gene, SNP, Structure).
  • Taxonomy Tree
    Taxonomy Tree

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...