• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of intorthopspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsOpen ChoiceSubmit Online
Int Orthop. Jun 2003; 27(3): 160–163.
Published online Feb 8, 2003. doi:  10.1007/s00264-003-0429-x
PMCID: PMC3458454

Language: English | French

Risk of amputation following limb salvage surgery with endoprosthetic replacement, in a consecutive series of 1261 patients

Abstract

Endoprosthetic replacements are commonly used for limb salvage following surgical excision of bone tumours. Advantages include initial reliability, rapid restoration of function and their ready availability. Potential long-term problems include loosening, infection and mechanical failure. Increasing problems may lead to the necessity for amputation; this paper assesses that risk. A total of 1,261 patients have undergone endoprosthetic replacements in our centre in the past 34 years, with a total of 6,507 patient years of follow up. A total of 112 patients have had subsequent amputation. The reasons for amputation were local recurrence in 71, infection in 38, mechanical failure in two and chronic pain in one. The proximal tibia had the greatest risk of amputation (n=38/245). The time to amputation varied from 2 days to 16 years, with a mean of 31 months. The risk of amputation decreased with time, although 10% took place after more than 5 years.

Résumé

Les remplacements prothétiques sont couramment utilisés pour la réhabilitation d'un membre après excision chirurgicale d'une tumeur osseuse. Les avantages incluent fiabilité initiale et restauration rapide de la fonction. Les ennuis potentiels à long terme sont le descellement, l'infection et la faillite mécanique. Les problèmes croissants peuvent mener à la nécessité d'une amputation; ce travail étudie ce risque. Un total de 1261 malades a subi des remplacements prothétiques dans les 34 années passées, avec un total de 6507 années- patients de suivi. 112 malades ont eu une amputation dont les raisons étaient: récidive locale pour 71, infection pour 38, échec mécanique pour 2 et douleur chronique pour 1 cas. Le tibia proximal avait le plus grand risque d'amputation (n=38/245). Le délai d'amputation variait de 2 jours à 16 années, avec une moyenne de 31 mois. Le risque d'amputation diminue avec le temps, bien que 10% des amputations aient eu lieu après plus de 5 années.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (154K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
1. Ayoub KS, Fiorenza F, Grimer RJ, Tillman RM, Carter SR (1999) Extendable endoprostheses of the humerus after resection of bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81:495–500 [PubMed]
2. Bengston Clin Orthop. 1989;245:173. [PubMed]
3. Bramwell J Clin Oncology. 1992;10:1579. [PubMed]
4. Capanna R, Morris HG, Campanacci D, Del Ben M, Campanacci M (1994) Modular uncemented prosthetic reconstruction after resection of tumours of the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76:178–186 [PubMed]
5. Craft J Clin Oncology. 1998;16:3628. [PubMed]
6. Crockarell JR, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Morrey BF (1998) Treatment of infection with debridement and retention of the components after hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 80:1306–1313 [PubMed]
7. Donati D, Biscaglia R (1998) The use of antibiotic impregnated cement in infected reconstructions after resection of bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80:1045–1050 [PubMed]
8. Eckhardt Clin Orthop. 1991;270:202. [PubMed]
9. Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Pynsent PB (1997) The cost-effectiveness of limb salvage for bone tumours, J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 79:558–561 [PubMed]
10. Grimer RJ, Shewell PC, Carter SR, et al (1999) Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81:488–494 [PubMed]
11. Grimer RJ, Belthur M, Cool P, Carter SR, Tillman RM (2000) Extendable replacements of proximal tibia for bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:255–260 [PubMed]
12. Ham long term consequences of endoprosthetic reconstructions Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:423. [PubMed]
13. Hanssen AD, Rand JA (1998) Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 80:910–922
14. Hernigou P, Delepine G, Goutallier D, Julieron A (1993) Massive allographs sterilised by irradiation: Clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75:904–913 [PubMed]
15. Horowitz Clin Orthop. 1993;293:280. [PubMed]
16. Hsu Arthroplasty. 1999;14:519. [PubMed]
17. Kabukcuoglu Clin Orthop. 1999;358:8. [PubMed]
18. Lord CF, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ (1998) Infection in bone allographs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70:369–376 [PubMed]
19. Malawer MM, Chou LB (1995) Prosthetic survival and clinical results with the use of large-segment replacements in the treatment of high-grade bone sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77:1154–1165 [PubMed]
20. Renard J Surg Oncol. 2000;73:198. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(200004)73:4<198::AID-JSO3>3.0.CO;2-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Roberts P, Chan D, Grimer RJ, Sneath RS, Scales JT (1991) Prosthetic replacement of the distal femur for primary bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73:762–769 [PubMed]
22. Souhami Lancet. 1997;350:911. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02307-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Tillman Sem in Surg Oncol. 1997;13:41. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199701/02)13:1<41::AID-SSU7>3.0.CO;2-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Unwin PS, Cannon SR, Grimer RJ, et al. (1996) Aseptic loosening in cemented custom made prosthetic replacements for bone tumours of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 78:5–13 [PubMed]

Articles from International Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...