• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2012; 7(8): e43971.
Published online Aug 30, 2012. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0043971
PMCID: PMC3431384

Extensive Pyrosequencing Reveals Frequent Intra-Genomic Variations of Internal Transcribed Spacer Regions of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA

Giovanni G. Vendramin, Editor

Abstract

Background

Internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) is already one of the most popular phylogenetic and DNA barcoding markers. However, the existence of its multiple copies has complicated such usage and a detailed characterization of intra-genomic variations is critical to address such concerns.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In this study, we used sequence-tagged pyrosequencing and genome-wide analyses to characterize intra-genomic variations of internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) regions from 178 plant species. We discovered that mutation of ITS2 is frequent, with a mean of 35 variants per species. And on average, three of the most abundant variants make up 91% of all ITS2 copies. Moreover, we found different congeneric species share identical variants in 13 genera. Interestingly, different species across different genera also share identical variants. In particular, one minor variant of ITS2 in Eleutherococcus giraldii was found identical to the ITS2 major variant of Panax ginseng, both from Araliaceae family. In addition, DNA barcoding gap analysis showed that the intra-genomic distances were markedly smaller than those of the intra-specific or inter-specific variants. When each of 5543 variants were examined for its species discrimination efficiency, a 97% success rate was obtained at the species level.

Conclusions

Identification of identical ITS2 variants across intra-generic or inter-generic species revealed complex species evolutionary history, possibly, horizontal gene transfer and ancestral hybridization. Although intra-genomic multiple variants are frequently found within each genome, the usage of the major variants alone is sufficient for phylogeny construction and species determination in most cases. Furthermore, the inclusion of minor variants further improves the resolution of species identification.

Introduction

The study of evolutionary novelty focuses on morphological traits [1] as well as genomic and proteomic data [2], especially molecular sequence data [3][9]. Among molecular sequences, the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of the nuclear ribosomal DNA cistron is one of the most frequently used markers for phylogenetics, diagnostics and DNA barcoding [10][18]. Most eukaryotes possess hundreds of tandem copies of this cistron, each consisting of the 18S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNA genes, two external transcribed spacers (ETS1 and ETS2), two internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2), and an intergenic spacer (IGS). Among them, ITS2 can be the most informative for discrimination at the species and subspecies levels, and it contains conserved secondary structures that can be used to facilitate alignments of higher taxonomic categories (from genus to order) due to its function in rRNA processing [19]. In each genome, however, there are hundreds of copies of ITS2 with potentially dozens of different sequences, so sequence comparisons involving just one or a few PCR-amplified ITS2 sequences from each species of interest may lead to inaccurate or misleading results [20]. This largely overlooked intra-genomic divergence of ITS2 sequences can particularly complicate the use of this marker in phylogenetic and barcoding applications. Conversely, the use of all ITS2 sequences within genomes to perform phylogenetic analyses has the potential to add new sources of data; e.g., whereas traditional methods using morphological traits and single-copy molecular markers can only display the current features of a given species, the full set of the non-coding ITS2 sequences can evolve more rapidly, yielding evolutionary insights that morphology and coding-sequences could not provide because of functional constraints. In this paper we demonstrate how intra-genomic sequence variation of ITS2 can be identified and used to provide additional direct genetic evidence reflecting the historical events of species evolution.

Although utilizing genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques has revealed variations in the genomic locations and numbers of ITS2 copies in plant genomes [20], the extent of the distribution and divergence of ITS2 intra-genomic variants has not been adequately explored. Nor has the relationship between ITS2 sequence divergence and plant phylogenetics been sufficiently examined. In fact, previous experiments utilizing denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and cloning techniques may have significantly underestimated intra-genomic ITS2 variation [21]. Next-generation pyrosequencing using Roche’s 454 method [22] has been used to identify genome-wide genetic changes [23] and examine taxonomic diversity [24][28], as well as to produce libraries of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) [29], [30]. In the present study, we performed sequence-tagged pyrosequencing to investigate the diversity of intra-genomic variants of ITS2 across a host of plant genomes, and used these variants to reevaluate some phylogenetic relationships. We confirmed the sensitivity and accuracy of sequence-tagged pyrosequencing for discovering intra-genomic ITS2 variants, by comparing our de novo ITS2 variants with sequences found in whole-genome sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana [31], Oryza sativa ssp. indica [32], Oryza sativa ssp. japonica [33], Populus trichocarpa [34], and Zea mays [35]. Our results strongly suggest that the intra-genomic ITS2 variants can reflect the phylogenetic history of species and genera.

Results

Reliability of Sequence-tagged Pyrosequencing for Discovering Intra-genomic ITS2 Variants

In this study, we obtained a mean of 2587 reads per sample, with a mean read length of 330 bases and high overall base-calling fidelity (Figure S1). We compared 454 reads from Panax quinquefolius with previously published P. quinquefolius sequences and found that the per-base pyrosequencing error rate was 1.29×10−4 (Table S1). However, similar to results reported by Schrijver et al. [36], homopolymeric regions of the sequences can give ambiguous results, making it difficult to determine whether so-called variants are bona fide variants or sequencing errors in such regions. Therefore, we suggest caution be used when evaluating variants within homopolymeric regions in the variants described below, although there is little effect on generating all of our results because of the low error rate. The terms “Number of variants”, “Number of variant copies”, “Number of 454 reads”, “Relative variant abundance (RVA)”, and “An ITS2 haplotype” are defined in Figure 1. An ITS2 haplotype in a genome contains all copies of all variants. The numbers of variants and the genetic distances between them are indicative of the divergence of ITS2 within and among plant genomes. A “major variant” is defined as any variant whose RVA is greater than 5%.

Figure 1
Schematic representation of an ITS2 haplotype.

To validate the reliability of ITS2 variants produced by pyrosequencing, we further compared the divergence of ITS2 variants identified using pyrosequencing data with data acquired from publicly available genome sequences and those obtained using the cloning method for 12 samples belonging to 5 species (Arabidopsis, maize, poplar, and two rice species). The results demonstrated that the sensitivity to discover minor variants of ITS2 in plant genomes using pyrosequencing technology is similar to that of whole genome sequence analysis but is far superior compared with the cloning method (Figure S2). The cloning method can be used to identify the major variants of ITS2 effectively, but it is ineffective in identifying minor variants even in the situation when more than one hundred clones were picked and sequenced. Therefore, pyrosequencing is a superior tool for discovering the ITS2 variants in plant genomes.

Intra-genomic Variation of ITS2 Sequences across a Wide Range of Plant Taxa

We analyzed 247 samples from 178 plant species and discovered that these genomes have 1 to 253 different ITS2 variants, with a mean of 35 and a median of 23 (Figure 2A). The distribution of major variants was shown in Figure 2B. The average number of major variants per species is fewer than 3, while number of minor variants per species was 32 in a genome (Figure 3A). The distribution of RVA for major and minor variants in 44 families displayed divergent forms (Figure 4). On average, the sum of RVA of major variants per species constituted 91% of 454 reads recovered from that specieś genome (Figure 3B). The results reveal that mutation of ITS2 in a genome is frequent but major variants of ITS2 are conservative and predominant.

Figure 2
Distribution of numbers of intra-genomic ITS2 variants from 178 species.
Figure 3
Average number of variants and average Relative Variant Abundance (RVA) per species.
Figure 4
Relative variant abundance (RVA) of various ITS2 variants in plant genomes.

According to the phylogenetic trees of intra-genomic variants from all species under investigation, intra-genomic variation of ITS2 sequences was distributed among three established evolution mechanisms [19]. The first mechanism is concerted evolution, whereby ITS2 variants evolved as units in plant genomes by the mechanics of unequal crossing-over and gene conversion; Panax ginseng genome has only one cluster of major variant, in agreement with results from this mechanism (Figure 5A, Figure S3A). The second mechanism is birth-and-death evolution, in which some ITS2 variants were produced by gene duplication and a fraction of them were subsequently lost by deletions, translocations, and change in chromosome number; Arabidopsis thaliana genome has two clusters of major variants and is considered a demonstration of such mechanism (Figure 5B, Figure S3B). The third mechanism is divergent evolution, whereby ITS2 variants within a plant genome evolved divergently and independently; Solanum lyratum genome has multiple clusters of major variants and can be best explained by this mechanism (Figure 5C, Figure S3C). In our study as a whole, concerted evolution appears to be the best mechanism explaining intra-genomic variation of ITS2 sequences for 65.7% of the species, while birth-and-death evolution and divergent evolution are the best mechanism to explain 27% and 7.3% of the species, respectively (Table S2). Regardless of the mechanisms that give rise to ITS2 variants, the intra-genomic variants often provide clues to the evolutionary history of species.

Figure 5
Unrooted Neighbor-Joining trees representing the results of three hypothetical mechanisms for the evolution of intra-genomic ITS2 variants.

Identification of Identical Variants across Species Reflects the Complex Species Evolutionary History

Based on genome-wide analyses of 247 samples from 178 species of angiosperms, gymnosperms and ferns, 88.8% of ITS2 variants possessed more than 80% identity among congeneric species, while only 45.5% of ITS2 variants possessed more than 80% identity among genera in the same family, but no ITS2 variants showed more than 80% identity among all tested families (Figure 6). ITS2 variants in plant genomes displayed varying degrees of similarity within most of plant taxa. In particular, some inter-specific or inter-generic ITS2 variants showed high degrees of sequence similarity, while others showed low degrees of sequence similarity. Remarkably, some inter-specific or inter-generic variants were 100% identical and their abundance varied. Such identical or highly-similar ITS2 variants can reflect the evolutionary history of the species in a manner different from the analysis of single-copy genes, which exhibit only the current characters of the species. From analyses of phylogenetic trees and genetic distances, these shared ITS2 variants within different plant taxa display closer phylogenetic relationships to each other than to those with other ITS2 variants.

Figure 6
Identity of ITS2 variants in plant genomes between different taxonomic clades.

For example, in the family Araliaceae, one minor variant of ITS2 in Eleutherococcus giraldii showed 100% identity to the ITS2 major variant of Panax ginseng (Figure 7A,B, Figure S4A). The variant was validated in the nuclear genomes of P. ginseng and E. giraldii through direct sequencing of PCR products using species-specific primers (Figure S4B). Based on 7.4×10−10 substitutions/site/year of ITS2 in Araliaceae, divergence dates among Panax species and among Eleutherococcus species were estimated to be 52 million year ago (MYA) and 25 MYA, respectively (Figure 7B). It should be pointed out that the bootstrap values for these nodes are less than 50%, which probably resulted from the limited polymorphic sites between samples. However, this phylogenetic relationship is consistent with those described previously [37]. These results indicated that the intra-genomic variants could reveal evidences for horizontal gene transfer or an ancestral hybridization event. In addition, intra-generic similar ITS2 variants were discovered in the genus Armeniaca (Rosaceae). Six pairs of variants derived from A. vulgaris and A. sibirica showed 100% identity, and all ITS2 variants showed more than 95% identity (Figure S5A). These data and the phylogenetic trees of ITS2 variants (Figure S5B,C) supported the hypothesis that identical variants derived from a common ancestor and were preserved in the genomes of the descendants. The variants were corroborated by direct Sanger-sequencing or cloning of PCR products (Figure S5D-H). As illustrated in these NJ and MP trees, the ITS2 variants reflected the close relationships among species within a given genus and can be regarded as molecular fossils, which are defined as any molecule whose contemporary structure or function gives clues about its evolutionary history [38]. Such fossils were also discovered in 12 other genera, including Epimedium (Berberidaceae), Inula (Asteraceae), Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae), Panax (Araliaceae), and Pinus (Pinaceae) (Figure S6), and NJ trees and MP trees of the ITS2 variants have supported the close relationships among species of these genera (Figure S7). Determination of these ITS2 variants by the direct sequencing or cloning of PCR products is as shown in Table S3.

Figure 7
Two identical variants of ITS2 in the genera Panax and Eleutherococcus of Araliaceae.

However, such molecular fossils were not discovered in all species under investigation. For example, among the four species we investigated from the genus Ilex (Aquifoliaceae) (I. asprella, I. cornuta, I. pubilimba, and I. rotunda) all ITS2 variants were clearly clustered within species, with high bootstrap values (Figure S8). Other genera for which ITS2 molecular fossils were not found include Astragalus (Fabaceae), Clerodendrum (Verbenaceae), and Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) (Figure S9). In the fact as described bellow, any of the variants could accurately distinguish these species. Overall, both major and minor variants in plant genomes were valuable markers for illustrating the evolutionary histories of many of the investigated species.

Effects of Intra-genomic ITS2 Variation on DNA Barcoding Studies

In order to determine the effect of intra-genomic ITS2 variation on DNA barcoding, only the genus having at least two species was selected to characterize intra-genomic, intra-specific, and inter-specific divergences. In total, 5543 variants of ITS2 from 207 samples of 153 species in 51 genera of 34 families were analyzed. Our results indicated that 97% of all ITS2 variants could be correctly identified at the species level, while 92% of ITS2 major variants produced correct identification (Table 1). Among 8 of 51 genera, identification efficiency of all intra-genomic variants at the species level is higher than that of major variants with the range 8% to 66% (Table 2). Only among 5 of 51 genera, identification efficiency of all intra-genomic variants at the species level is lower than that of major variants with the range 1% to 3%. However, among 38 of 51 genera, identification efficiency of all intra-genomic variants at the species level is the same as that of major variants with 100%. Even if for 18 species of the genus Dendrobium, intra-genomic 440 variants could correctly identify each species (Table 2). These results show that the ability of species identification increases when full set of ITS2 variants was considered.

Table 1
Identification efficiency at species level for ITS2 variants from 207 samples of 153 species in 51 genera using best BLAST hit.
Table 2
Identification efficiency at species level for ITS2 variants among each of 51 genera using best BLAST hit.

As a result, we investigated further whether DNA barcoding gap is present. DNA barcoding gap exposed that the intra-genomic distances were markedly less than those of the intra-specific or inter-specific variants (Figure 8). These results indicated that the distribution for all ITS2 variants could be used to distinguish the species. Previously, the existence of a few major variants in plant genomes has allowed ITS2 to be used as a molecular marker in phylogenetics and barcoding. Although this use of ITS2 was successful in the sense that the major sequence or sequences have been used to distinguish species, the full capacity of the ITS2 variant set, including its minor variants, was overlooked.

Figure 8
The presence/absence of barcode gaps.

Discussion

Nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence variation in 34 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in 12 Drosophila species has been previously investigated by whole-genome shotgun sequencing [39], [40]. However, no attempts have been made to evaluate the overall diversity of nrDNA sequence variation across a wide range of plant species because of obstacle in detectability. To our knowledge, this study represents the first quantitative analysis of genome-scale sequence variation of ITS2 in 178 plant species using the 454-pyrosequecing method. We discovered that in a wide range of plant taxa including those of the model plant species (Arabidopsis, maize, poplar, and two rice species), mutation of ITS2 is frequent with a mean of 35 variants per species. This abundance of mutations provides resources for natural selection and species evolution, supporting the hypothesis that multiple copies of ITS sequences may prove to be highly informative in explaining phylogenetic history [41].

The evolutionary progress of intra-genomic ITS2 variants generally revealed the phylogenetic histories of species. Even if the phylogenetic relationship of Panax revealed by its ITS2 variants was in agreement with previous reports [42], [43], the affinity between Panax and Eleutherococcus reflected by the identical variant was a substantial finding that could not have been as demonstrated by single-copy gene analysis alone. Since the ITS2 variant was major in P. ginseng but minor in E. giraldii, it may have been integrated into E. giraldii genome from the P. ginseng genome through horizontal gene transfer or an ancestral hybridization event. Recently, the observation of ITS variants in the Musaceae enables determination of hybrid origin [44]. The identical ITS2 variants shared for A. vulgaris and A. sibirica provide direct genetic information that reveals close phylogenetic relationships under-reported in previous research [45][47]. The results may imply that multiple gene families such as 5S RNA genes also share ancestral polymorphism [48]. However, some plant taxa do not contain such ITS2 variants. One possible explanation is that the concerted evolution of multiple repeat arrays had already taken place in these species. Another possible reason is that sufficiently closely related species from those genera were not included in our study; a further analysis including more of the closely related species would test that possibility.

Based on the analysis of a large sample size, intra-genomic variants of ITS2 sequences proved to be powerful for species identification and provide a significant contribution to the field of DNA barcoding technology, which has recently attracted widespread attention [49][53]. Moreover, our results are important because they resolve the controversy about the internal transcribed spacer (ITS); i.e., the multicopy nature of ITS1 and ITS2 sequences has reduced their utility in phylogenetic analysis for many years [20], and more recently has rendered them unacceptable for use as standard barcodes across the plant kingdom [54][56]. On the other hand, many researchers have insisted that ITS2 be the best marker for phylogenetics and for barcoding [10], [12], [14], [16], [57][61]. Our results provide effective and direct evidence for the intra-genomic divergence of ITS2, and illustrate how ITS2 variants can yield insights into DNA barcoding. In addition, the analytical protocol we have established may enable the construction of an ITS2-based DNA barcode database, a valuable resource for investigating on ITS2 secondary structures, compensatory base changes (CBC), and etc [62][67]. Previous study has revealed that a CBC in an ITS2 sequence-structure alignment is a sufficient condition to distinguish even closely related species [68]. This CBC study focused on the sequences of the ITS2 major variants. Our study further characterizes the distribution and utilities of multiple ITS2 variants. Combining these results together, it supports the notion that ITS2 possesses a unique capacity to differentiate closely related species [12], [14], [59], [61], [69]; at the same time it also suggests that intra-genomic variation is less likely to compromise the vast majority of barcoding applications (e.g. that use direct sequencing) as previously reported [54][56]. This finding supports the use of ITS2 as a valuable supplementary locus for the standard plant barcode of rbcL+matK [50], [70].

In summary, intra-genomic ITS2 variants represent a valuable source that help reveal the evolutionary histories of related species, and the major variants of ITS2 can be useful in phylogenetic and barcoding applications.

Materials and Methods

DNA Samples and PCR Conditions

For the 5 species (maize, Arabidopsis, poplar, and two rice species) with publicly available whole genome sequences, in vitro cultured sterile plantlets were used for DNA extraction. Procurement of materials from other plant species was described previously [14], [71], [72]. Genomic DNA extraction was performed using the Plant Genomic DNA Extraction Kit according to the manufacturer′s protocol (Tiangen Biotech Co., China). ITS2 sequences were obtained from 247 samples from 178 species of 76 genera belonging to 44 families of angiosperms, gymnosperms, and ferns (Table S4). The plant materials were mainly selected based on the list in Chinese Pharmacopoeia, which possess medical importance. In addition, we took particular interests in those that are also economically important species, such as Panax ginseng, Dendrobium nobile and etc. To distinguish each PCR product, unique sequence-tagged PCR primer pairs were designed for each sample (Table S5). Each 25 µL PCR mixture contained ~30 ng of template DNA, 2.5 µL of 10×PCR buffer, 1 µL of 2.5 mM dNTPs mix, 0.5 U of High-fidelity Pyrobest ® DNA Polymerase (Takara Biotech Co., China), and 1.0 µL of 2.5 µM ITS2 primers (synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd, China). The PrimeSTAR® HS DNA Polymerase with GC Buffer (Takara Biotech Co., China) was used for Oryza sativa ssp. japonica, Oryza sativa ssp. indica and Populus trichocarpa, since the GC content of these ITS2 sequences is ca. 70%. PCR runs were performed using a BIO-RAD DNA Engine® Peltier Thermal Cycler with near-universal programs (Table S6). In addition, three PCR products from Panax quinquefolius with known sequences of lengths 176 bp, 187 bp, and 350 bp (GenBank accessions: JF927163, JF927167, JF927168) were used as internal controls to measure the sequencing accuracy of pyrosequencing.

454 Pyrosequencing and Cloning

The PCR products were purified using a TIANquick Midi Purification Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., China) and dissolved in 30–50 µL of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The concentration and purity of the PCR products were examined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). 170 ng of each PCR product was mixed, then concentrated in less than 500 µL of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) using an Amicon Ultra-0.5 mL 30 kDa membrane (Millipore, USA). The mixture was sequenced in separate half-lanes of a picotiter plate using a GS_FLX pyrosequencer according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The raw 454 reads were submitted to GenBank with accession number SRA037432.

To confirm that our methods were sensitive enough to discover intra-genomic ITS2 variants and to further validate the accuracy of sequence data produced by the 454 pyro-sequencing, 12 samples belonging to 5 species with sequenced genomes were analyzed using PCR amplification, cloning and Sanger DNA sequencing methods. The PCR products were examined by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and recovered using an agarose gel recovering kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., China). The recovered products were then ligated to pMD® 18-T Vector (Takara Biotech Co., China) after adding dATP at the 3′end of the PCR products using a DNA A-Tailing Kit (Takara Biotech Co., China) and transformed into the E. coli DH5α strain using standard recombinant DNA techniques [73]. Identification of the transformed bacteria was performed by PCR using M13 primers. For each sample, 24 to 120 PCR-identified positive clones were subjected to direct sequencing using a 3730XL DNA Analyzer (ABI, USA).

Data Analyses

The obtained pyrosequencing reads were analyzed according to the work flow diagram (Figure S10). First, all 454 sequence reads were assigned to the original samples according to perfect matches with the sequence-tagged PCR primers. The distributions of read number, read length, number of reads from forward or reverse strands, and base quality were calculated and evaluated. Second, we used the algorithm to reduce pyrosequencing noise [27]. Third, the ITS2 sequences from a subset of investigated species were obtained by bi-direction Sanger sequencing of PCR products, or directly downloaded from GenBank, as standard query sequences which was annotated using hidden Markov models (HMM). A database of full-length ITS2 sequences from the investigated species was compiled using our full-length-match ITS2 pyrosequencing reads (if we obtained more than 50 reads from that sample), and sequences obtained according to standard query sequences using BLAST hits with E-values less than 10−20. Fourth, the variants of intact ITS2 regions supported by at least two pyrosequencing reads were selected for further analysis. All ITS2 variants were then sorted using scripts written in the Python programming language. Fifth, sequence alignment for the ITS2 variants was performed using MUSCLE (version 3.6, [74] ) and further adjusted manually using Jalview (version 2.7, [75] ). K2P genetic distances [76] were computed using PAUP 4b10 [77]. Sixth, Neighbor-Joining (NJ) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) trees were constructed with PAUP 4b10. Based on a fossil calibration of the split between Dendropanax and Merrilliopanax at 45 MYA [37], the substitution rate of ITS2 in Araliaceae was calculated to be 7.4×10−10 substitutions/site/year, which is in agreement with nrITS’s range of substitution rate (from 3.8×10−10 to 8.34×10−9) [78]. Names and GenBank accession numbers of the other 37 previously published ITS2 sequences from Araliaceae and two outgroup taxa were listed in Table S7. Seventh, based on the ITS2 variants, species identification was carried out using BLAST1 method as described previously by Ross et al. [79]. Finally, identity analyses between pairs of variants were performed using the pairwise alignment function of MUSCLE software v. 3.6, and the identities between congeneric species, between genera in the same family, and between different families were computed using custom scripts.

In addition, the whole genome sequence data for the five model species were downloaded from the Tair-AGI genomic database (Arabidopsis thaliana), the NCBI Trace Archive (Zea mays, Oryza sativa ssp. indica, Oryza sativa ssp. japonica), and JGI (Populus trichocarpa). The ITS2 regions were extracted using the procedures described above. The ITS2 sequences with base quality scores greater than 20, or those with variants that occurred more than two times, were used for further analysis.

Verification of the Identical ITS2 Variants Derived from Different Species

According to the sequences of the identical ITS2 variants obtained from the 454 reads, specific primer pairs for the corresponding samples were designed (Table S8). The PCR cycling regimes and reaction conditions were shown in Table S9. The cloning of PCR products was performed following the protocols described above. The PCR cycling regimes and reaction conditions for the ITS2 variants that had been confirmed by PCR with the universal primers were described in a previous study [14].

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Overview of the 454 sequencing data. (A) Distribution of read number among the investigated samples. (B) Distribution of read lengths in the investigated samples. (C) Distribution of sense vs. antisense reads in the investigated samples. (D) Distribution of base quality. The base quality was low for homopolymer lengths greater than 3 bases.

(PDF)

Figure S2

Comparison of ITS2 variants from completed genome sequence data, cloning data and 454 pyrosequencing data. For each species, an unrooted Neighbor-Joining tree shows the diversity of ITS2 variants. Each branch represents an ITS2 variant, labeled with the sample number followed by the rank of the variant, RVA of the variant, and the letter (G, C or F). The letter G indicates a variant derived from completed genome sequence data. The letter C represents a variant derived from cloning data. The letter F represents a variant derived from 454 data. (A) Unrooted tree of ITS2 variants in Arabidopsis thaliana. (B) Unrooted tree of ITS2 variants in Oryza sativa ssp. japonica. (C) Unrooted tree of ITS2 variants in Oryza sativa ssp. indica. (D) Unrooted tree of ITS2 variants in Populus trichocarpa. (E) Unrooted tree of ITS2 variants in Zea mays.

(PDF)

Figure S3

Unrooted Maximum Parsimony trees displaying the evolutionary mechanisms of intra-genomic ITS2 variants in plant genomes. (A) The concerted evolution mechanism. Panax ginseng is used as an example. The red line indicates the most major variant. (B) The birth-and-death evolution mechanism. Arabidopsis thaliana is used as an example. The red lines indicate the two main variant clusters. (C) The divergent evolution mechanism. Solanum lyratum is used as an example. The red lines indicate multiple clusters of variants.

(PDF)

Figure S4

Two identical variants of ITS2 in the genera Panax and Eleutherococcus of Araliaceae. (A) The Maximum Parsimony (MP) tree of ITS2 in Araliaceae. One minor variant of ITS2 in Eleutherococcus giraldii showed close affinity to the ITS2 variants of Panax ginseng and was clustered with them. (B) This ITS2 variant, which was the major variant in the Panax ginseng genome but minor in Eleutherococcus giraldii, was confirmed by direct sequencing of PCR products using specific primers. The sequencing trace from E. giraldii shows double peaks at some bases, and these double peaks correspond to the major ITS2 variant in P. ginseng. The bases having double peaks are boxed in red.

(PDF)

Figure S5

ITS2 variants representing molecular fossils in the genus Armeniaca (Rosaceae). (A) The variants are linked using red and blue lines at 100% and 95% identities, respectively. Each open box represents a single variant with RVA over 1%, and each solid box represents the variants with RVA less than 1%. The ruler shows the RVA in percentage. (B,C) The Neighbor-Joining (NJ) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) trees of ITS2 variants indicated that genetic information from the common ancestor was maintained in the genomes of two species derived from Armeniaca (Rosaceae). The same colors represent the same species. The same shade and color of symbols show the variants with 100% identity. The Latin names of species are followed by the rank and RVA of the variants. (D) The ITS2 variants in A. vulgaris were confirmed by direct sequencing of PCR products. The sequencing trace from A. vulgaris shows double peaks at some bases, and these double peaks correspond to the different ITS2 variants in A. vulgaris. The bases with double peaks are boxed in red. (E-H) The variants as molecular fossils of A. sibirica were confirmed by cloning of PCR products.

(PDF)

Figure S6

The variants are linked using red and blue lines at 100% and 95% identities, respectively. Each open box represents a single variant with RVA over 1%, and each solid box represents the variants with RVA less than 1%. The rulers show the RVA in percentage. (A) Epimedium (Berberidaceae). (B) Inula (Asteraceae). (C) Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae). (D) Panax (Araliaceae). (E) Pinus (Pinaceae).

(PDF)

Figure S7

The Neighbor-Joining and the Maximum Parsimony trees of ITS2 variants indicated that genetic information from the common ancestor was maintained in the genomes of descendants. The same colors represent the same species. The same shade and color of symbols show the variants with 100% identity. The Latin names of species are followed by the rank and RVA of the variants. (A,B) Epimedium (Berberidaceae). (C,D) Inula (Asteraceae). (E,F) Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae). (G,H) Panax (Araliaceae). (I,J) Pinus (Pinaceae).

(PDF)

Figure S8

The Neighbor-Joining tree of ITS2 variants of four species in the genus Ilex (Aquifoliaceae). The same colors represent the same species. The Latin names of species are followed by the rank and RVA of the variants.

(PDF)

Figure S9

The Neighbor-Joining tree of ITS2 variants in the genera. (A) Astragalus (Fabaceae), (B) Clerodendrum (Verbenaceae), and (C) Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae). The same colors represent the same species. The Latin names of species are followed by the rank and RVA of the variants.

(PDF)

Figure S10

The work flow for the processing and analysis of pyrosequencing reads.

(PDF)

Table S1

Determining the pyrosequencing error rate using known Panax quinquefolius sequences as internal controls.

(PDF)

Table S2

The evolutionary mechanisms of ITS2 variants across 178 plant species under investigation.

(PDF)

Table S3

ITS2 variants which have been verified by PCR products cloned or directly sequenced.

(PDF)

Table S4

Samples and their voucher numbers.

(PDF)

Table S5

Sequence-tagged PCR primer pairs for each sample.

(PDF)

Table S6

PCR cycling regime for primers in Table S5.

(PDF)

Table S7

GenBank accession numbers of the 37 previously published ITS2 sequences from Araliaceae and two outgroup taxa.

(PDF)

Table S8

Specific primer pairs for the corresponding species.

(PDF)

Table S9

The PCR cycling and reaction conditions for specific primer pairs in Table S8.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Jingsheng Lai for providing Zea mays line B73, Bin Wu for providing Oryza sativa ssp. indica and Oryza sativa ssp. japonica, Yulin Lin, Jianhua Miao, Xiaojun Ma, Liying Yu, Yi Zhang, and Rui Gu for their assistance in collecting some of the plant samples. Joerg Schultz, Matthias Wolf, and Sribash Roy provided constructive comments for the manuscript. We also thank Christine Leon for helping to refine the manuscript, and Yan Li for carefully reading the manuscript.

Funding Statement

Financial support was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30970307, No. 81130069). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Budd AF, Pandolfi JM (2010) Evolutionary novelty is concentrated at the edge of coral species distributions. Science 328: 1558–1561 [PubMed]
2. Gough NR, Wong W (2010) Focus issue: the evolution of complexity. Sci Signal 3: eg5. [PubMed]
3. Dover G (1982) Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature 299: 111–117 [PubMed]
4. Nei M, Zhang J (1998) Molecular origin of species. Science 282: 1428–1429 [PubMed]
5. Richardson JE, Pennington RT, Pennington TD, Hollingsworth PM (2001) Rapid diversification of a species-rich genus of neotropical rain forest trees. Science 293: 2242–2245 [PubMed]
6. Sanderson MJ (2008) Phylogenetic signal in the eukaryotic tree of life. Science 321: 121–123 [PubMed]
7. Smith SA, Donoghue MJ (2008) Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science 322: 86–89 [PubMed]
8. Hasselmann M, Lechner S, Schulte C, Beye M (2010) Origin of a function by tandem gene duplication limits the evolutionary capability of its sister copy. P Nat Acad Sci USA 107: 13378–13383 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Michaud M, Cognat V, Duchene AM, Marechal-Drouard L (2011) A global picture of tRNA genes in plant genomes. Plant J 66: 80–93 [PubMed]
10. Coleman AW (2003) ITS2 is a double-edged tool for eukaryote evolutionary comparisons. Trends Genet 19: 370–375 [PubMed]
11. Coleman AW (2009) Is there a molecular key to the level of “biological species” in eukaryotes? A DNA guide. Mol Phylogenet Evol 50: 197–203 [PubMed]
12. Nieto Feliner G, Rossello JA (2007) Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants. Mol Phylogenet Evol 44: 911–919 [PubMed]
13. Wiemers M, Keller A, Wolf M (2009) ITS2 secondary structure improves phylogeny estimation in a radiation of blue butterflies of the subgenus Agrodiaetus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Polyommatus). BMC Evol Biol 9: 300. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Chen SL, Yao H, Han JP, Liu C, Song JY, et al. (2010) Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One 5: e8613. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Keller A, Forster F, Muller T, Dandekar T, Schultz J, et al. (2010) Including RNA secondary structures improves accuracy and robustness in reconstruction of phylogenetic trees. Biol Direct 5: 4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Koetschan C, Forster F, Keller A, Schleicher T, Ruderisch B, et al. (2010) The ITS2 database III–sequences and structures for phylogeny. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D275–279 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Chinese Plant BOL Group (2011) Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. P Nat Acad Sci USA 108: 19641–19646 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Pang XH, Song JY, Zhu YJ, Xu HX, Huang LF, et al. (2011) Applying plant DNA barcodes for Rosaceae species identification. Cladistics 27: 165–170
19. Nei M, Rooney AP (2005) Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families. Annu Rev Genet 39: 121–152 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Alvarez I, Wendel JF (2003) Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29: 417–434 [PubMed]
21. Thornhill DJ, Lajeunesse TC, Santos SR (2007) Measuring rDNA diversity in eukaryotic microbial systems: how intragenomic variation, pseudogenes, and PCR artifacts confound biodiversity estimates. Mol Ecol 16: 5326–5340 [PubMed]
22. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376–380 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Yang SH, Land ML, Klingeman DM, Pelletier DA, Lu TYS, et al. (2010) Paradigm for industrial strain improvement identifies sodium acetate tolerance loci in Zymomonas mobilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. P Nat Acad Sci USA 107: 10395–10400 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Binladen J, Gilbert MTP, Bollback JP, Panitz F, Bendixen C, et al. (2007) The use of coded PCR primers enables high-throughput sequencing of multiple homolog amplification products by 454 parallel sequencing. PLoS One 2: e197. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Andersson AF, Lindberg M, Jakobsson H, Backhed F, Nyren P, et al. (2008) Comparative analysis of human gut microbiota by barcoded pyrosequencing. PLoS One 3: e2836. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Gomez-Alvarez V, Teal TK, Schmidt TM (2009) Systematic artifacts in metagenomes from complex microbial communities. ISME J 3: 1314–1317 [PubMed]
27. Quince C, Lanzen A, Curtis TP, Davenport RJ, Hall N, et al. (2009) Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data. Nat Methods 6: 639–641 [PubMed]
28. Ghannoum MA, Jurevic RJ, Mukherjee PK, Cui F, Sikaroodi M, et al. (2010) Characterization of the oral fungal microbiome (Mycobiome) in healthy individuals. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000713. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Li Y, Luo HM, Sun C, Song JY, Sun YZ, et al. (2010) EST analysis reveals putative genes involved in glycyrrhizin biosynthesis. BMC Genomics 11: 268. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Sun C, Li Y, Wu Q, Luo HM, Sun YZ, et al. (2010) De novo sequencing and analysis of the American ginseng root transcriptome using a GS FLX titanium platform to discover putative genes involved in ginsenoside biosynthesis. BMC Genomics 11: 262. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796–815 [PubMed]
32. Yu J, Hu S, Wang J, Wong GKS, Li SG, et al. (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science 296: 79–92 [PubMed]
33. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang RL, et al. (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp japonica). Science 296: 92–100 [PubMed]
34. Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, et al. (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313: 1596–1604 [PubMed]
35. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei FS, et al. (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326: 1112–1115 [PubMed]
36. De Schrijver JM, De Leeneer K, Lefever S, Sabbe N, Pattyn F, et al. (2010) Analysing 454 amplicon resequencing experiments using the modular and database oriented variant identification pipeline. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 269. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Mitchell A, Wen J (2005) Phylogeny of Brassaiopsis (Araliaceae) in Asia based on nuclear ITS and 5S-NTS DNA sequences. Syst Bot 30: 872–886
38. Maizels N, Weiner AM (1994) Phylogeny from function: evidence from the molecular fossil record that tRNA originated in replication, not translation. P Nat Acad Sci USA 91: 6729–6734 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. James SA, O’Kelly MJT, Carter DM, Davey RP, van Oudenaarden A, et al. (2009) Repetitive sequence variation and dynamics in the ribosomal DNA array of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as revealed by whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res 19: 626–635 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Stage DE, Eickbush TH (2007) Sequence variation within the rRNA gene loci of 12 Drosophila species. Genome Res 17: 1888–1897 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Coleman AW (2007) Pan-eukaryote ITS2 homologies revealed by RNA secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 3322–3329 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Zhu S, Fushimi H, Cai SQ, Komatsu K (2003) Phylogenetic relationship in the genus Panax: inferred from chloroplast trnK gene and nuclear 18S rRNA gene sequences. Planta Med 69: 647–653 [PubMed]
43. Lee C, Wen J (2004) Phylogeny of Panax using chloroplast trnC-trnD intergenic region and the utility of trnC-trnD in interspecific studies of plants. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31: 894–903 [PubMed]
44. Hribova E, Cizkova J, Christelova P, Taudien S, De Langhe E, et al. (2011) The ITS1–5.8S-ITS2 sequence region in the Musaceae: structure, diversity and use in molecular phylogeny. PLoS One 6: e17863. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Lee S, Wen J (2001) A phylogenetic analysis of Prunus and the Amygdaloideae (Rosaceae) using ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Am J Bot 88: 150–160 [PubMed]
46. Potter D, Eriksson T, Evans RC, Oh S, Smedmark JEE, et al. (2007) Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Syst Evol 266: 5–43
47. Wen J, Berggren ST, Lee CH, Ickert-Bond S, Yi TS, et al. (2008) Phylogenetic inferences in Prunus (Rosaceae) using chloroplast ndhF and nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. J Syst Evol 46: 322–332
48. Kellogg EA, Appels R (1995) Intraspecific and interspecific variation in 5S RNA genes are decoupled in diploid wheat relatives. Genetics 140: 325–343 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. P Nat Acad Sci USA 102: 8369–8374 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. P Nat Acad Sci USA 106: 12794–12797 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Thomas C (2009) Plant bar code soon to become reality. Science 325: 526–526 [PubMed]
52. Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP (2011) Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS One 6: e19254. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Li DZ, Liu JQ, Chen ZD, Wang H, Ge XJ, et al. (2011) Plant DNA barcoding in China. J Syst Evol 49(3): 165–168
54. Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, Berg C, Madriñán S, et al. (2007) A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56: 295–299
55. Kress WJ, Erickson DL (2007) A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One 2: e508. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Chase MW, Fay MF (2009) Response to J. Schultz and M. Wolf’s E-Letter. Sci Signal http://www.sciencemag.org/content/325/5941/682/reply
57. Eickbush TH, Eickbush DG (2007) Finely orchestrated movements: evolution of the ribosomal RNA genes. Genetics 175: 477–485 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Schultz J, Wolf M (2009) ITS better than its reputation. Sci Signal http://www.sciencemag.org/content/325/5941/682.full/reply#sci_el_12692
59. Gao T, Yao H, Song JY, Zhu YJ, Liu C, et al. (2010) Evaluating the feasibility of using candidate DNA barcodes in discriminating species of the large Asteraceae family. BMC Evol Biol 10: 324. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Poczai P, Hyvonen J (2010) Nuclear ribosomal spacer regions in plant phylogenetics: problems and prospects. Mol Biol Rep 37: 1897–1912 [PubMed]
61. Buchheim MA, Keller A, Koetschan C, Forster F, Merget B, et al. (2011) Internal transcribed spacer 2 (nu ITS2 rRNA) sequence-structure phylogenetics: towards an automated reconstruction of the green algal tree of life. PLoS One 6: e16931. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Razafimandimbison SG, Kellogg EA, Bremer B (2004) Recent origin and phylogenetic utility of divergent ITS putative pseudogenes: a case study from Naucleeae (Rubiaceae). Syst Biol 53: 177–192 [PubMed]
63. Wolf M, Achtziger M, Schultz J, Dandekar T, Muller T (2005) Homology modeling revealed more than 20,000 rRNA internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) secondary structures. RNA 11: 1616–1623 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Selig C, Wolf M, Muller T, Dandekar T, Schultz J (2008) The ITS2 database II: homology modelling RNA structure for molecular systematics. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D377–D380 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Schultz J, Wolf M (2009) ITS2 sequence-structure analysis in phylogenetics: A how-to manual for molecular systematics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 52: 520–523 [PubMed]
66. Keller A, Schleicher T, Schultz J, Muller T, Dandekar T, et al. (2009) 5.8S-28S rRNA interaction and HMM-based ITS2 annotation. Gene 430: 50–57 [PubMed]
67. Ruhl MW, Wolf M, Jenkins TM (2010) Compensatory base changes illuminate morphologically difficult taxonomy. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54: 664–669 [PubMed]
68. Müller T, Philippi N, Dandekar T, Schultz J, Wolf M (2007) Distinguishing species. RNA 13: 1469–1472 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Yao H, Song J, Liu C, Luo K, Han JP, et al. (2010) Use of ITS2 region as the universal DNA barcode for plants and animals. PLoS One 5: e13102. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Hollingsworth PM (2011) Refining the DNA barcode for land plants. P Nat Acad Sci USA 108: 19451–19452 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Ma XY, Xie CX, Liu C, Song JY, Yao H, et al. (2010) Species identification of medicinal pteridophytes by a DNA barcode marker, the chloroplast psbA-trnH intergenic region. Biol Pharm Bull 33: 1919–1924 [PubMed]
72. Pang XH, Luo HM, Sun C (2012) Assessing the potential of candidate DNA barcodes for identifying non-flowering seed plants. Plant Biol 14: 839–844 [PubMed]
73. Marchuk D, Drumm M, Saulino A, Collins FS (1991) Construction of T-vectors, a rapid and general system for direct cloning of unmodified PCR products. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 1154. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792–1797 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ (2009) Jalview Version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25: 1189–1191 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120 [PubMed]
77. Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). version 4. Sinauer associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
78. Kay KM, Whittall JB, Hodges SA (2006) A survey of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer substitution rates across angiosperms: an approximate molecular clock with life history effects. BMC Evol Biol 6: 36. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
79. Ross HA, Murugan S, Li WLS (2008) Testing the reliability of genetic methods of species identification via simulation. Syst Biol 57: 216–230 [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...