• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2012; 7(8): e42859.
Published online Aug 17, 2012. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0042859
PMCID: PMC3422300

Analysis of HIV Early Infant Diagnosis Data to Estimate Rates of Perinatal HIV Transmission in Zambia

Landon Myer, Editor

Abstract

Background

Mother-to-child transmission of HIV (MTCT) remains the most prevalent source of pediatric HIV infection. Most PMTCT (prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV) programs have concentrated monitoring and evaluation efforts on process rather than on outcome indicators. In this paper, we review service data from 28,320 children born to HIV-positive mothers to estimate MTCT rates.

Method

This study analyzed DNA PCR results and PMTCT data from perinatally exposed children zero to 12 months of age from five Zambian provinces between September 2007 and July 2010.

Results

The majority of children (58.6%) had a PCR test conducted between age six weeks and six months. Exclusive breastfeeding (56.8%) was the most frequent feeding method. An estimated 45.9% of mothers were below 30 years old and 93.3% had disclosed their HIV status. In terms of ARV regimen for PMTCT, 32.7% received AZT+single dose NVP (sdNVP), 30.9% received highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART), 19.6% received sdNVP only and 12.9% received no ARVs. Transmission rates at six weeks when ARVs were received by both mother and baby, mother only, baby only, and none were 5.8%, 10.5%, 15.8% and 21.8% respectively. Transmission rates at six weeks where mother received HAART, AZT+sd NVP, sdNVP, and no intervention were 4.2%, 6.8%, 8.7% and 20.1% respectively. Based on adjusted analysis including ARV exposures and non ARV-related parameters, lower rates of positive PCR results were associated with 1) both mother and infant receiving prophylaxis, 2) children never breastfed and 3) mother being 30 years old or greater.

Overall between September 2007 and July 2010, 12.2% of PCR results were HIV positive. Between September 2007 and January 2009, then between February 2009 and July 2010, proportions of positive PCR results were 15.1% and 11% respectively, a significant difference.

Conclusion

The use of ARV drugs reduces vertical transmission of HIV in a program setting. Non-chemoprophylactic factors also play a significant role in HIV transmission. The overall change in the proportions of positive PCR results over time is more likely an indication of better PMTCT implementation. Determination of the outcomes of PMTCT in program settings is feasible but requires accurate documentation and analysis.

Introduction

Mother-to-child transmission of HIV (MTCT) remains the most prevalent source of pediatric HIV infection. In 2010 alone, an estimated 390,000 children were infected with HIV, 90% of whom live in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. Pediatric HIV threatens to reverse gains made in controlling child mortality in African countries with high HIV seroprevalence. HIV infection accounts for more than 20% of child deaths in southern Africa compared with approximately 3% globally [2].

This threat has been recognized by the international community, which has spurred advocacy, political and financial responses to reduce – and ultimately eliminate – MTCT. Indeed in recent years the number of women accessing programs that aim to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV has steadily increased [3]. Most prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programs have concentrated monitoring and evaluation efforts on measuring process indicators such as acceptance rate of HIV testing and counseling or proportion of HIV-positive women provided with antiretroviral drugs.

However, in order to compare progress across different PMTCT approaches and to mount a coordinated response, there is need to move beyond process indicators and measure PMTCT outcomes. Many approaches – with their advantages and limitations – have been suggested to measure outcomes of PMTCT [4], [5]. One of the indicators proposed to measure PMTCT outcomes is the number of “infant infections averted” that can also be interpreted as the rate of MTCT.

In recent years, access to early infant diagnosis of HIV (EID) has substantially increased in Zambia. This programmatic success in scaling up EID provides an opportunity to measure the rate of MTCT, an outcome of PMTCT.

Earlier we published test results of 8,237 perinatally exposed children to estimate HIV transmission rates in a program setting in Zambia [6], [7]. In this paper, we provide an update to those results, analyzing data from 28,320 perinatally exposed infants, which includes the previously published data. This new analysis is also an opportunity to review how changes in the PMTCT policy and implementation has affected the rate of MTCT. Indeed, between 2007 and 2010, Zambian PMTCT programs had gradually shifted from sdNVP based to more efficacious ARVs regimens – AZT+sdNVP or HAART.

An analysis of DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results was conducted, coupled with PMTCT observational data, to estimate MTCT rates among HIV-exposed children aged zero to six weeks, six weeks to six months, and six months to 12 months. MTCT rates were estimated according to 1) who received an antiretroviral (ARV) regimen (mother, infant, both, or neither), 2) type of ARV regimen provided, 3) place of delivery, 4) mother's age, and 5) whether the mother disclosed her HIV status.

Methods

Study context

The Zambia Prevention Care and Treatment Partnership (ZPCT) project, launched in 2005, and its follow-on project, ZPCT II, have supported the continuum of care for PMTCT: from HIV testing of pregnant women to early diagnosis of HIV among children born to HIV-positive mothers. ZPCT support covers five of the nine provinces in Zambia, namely Central, Copperbelt, Luapula, North-Western, and Northern Provinces. Support is provided at the primary, secondary and tertiary level health facilities as well as at the community level.

PMTCT activities are implemented in 350 public and private ZPCT-supported health facilities. Women that test HIV-positive are offered a CD4 count either onsite or offsite through a sample referral system. CD4 count results are used to determine eligibility for lifelong antiretroviral treatment (ART) according to the Zambian national PMTCT guidelines [8]. Women with a CD4 count less than or equal to 350 cells/mm3 are offered lifelong highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to be initiated as soon as possible. Those women with a CD4 count above 350 are offered zidovudine (AZT) as early as 14 weeks of pregnancy and intrapartum single dose nevirapine (sdNVP)+lamivudine (3TC). The “sdNVP only” regimen is the last option when women, for any reason, are unable to initiate AZT short course or lifelong ART.

Prior to WHO's 2010 revision of the global PMTCT recommendations, sdNVP constituted the backbone of PMTCT implemented in Zambia [9]. ZPCT does not provide free infant formula and encourages exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life when formula feeding is not affordable, feasible, acceptable, safe, and sustainable. The program supports early infant diagnosis (EID) of HIV and refers HIV-infected children to care and treatment centers for early initiation of pediatric ART.

In 2007, ZPCT supported the Ministry of Health to establish a DNA PCR laboratory capacity at Arthur Davidson Children's Hospital, a tertiary health facility located in the Copperbelt Province. Dried Blood Spot (DBS) samples are collected at PMTCT sites by trained staff and then transported periodically to a central collection point by motorcycle provided by ZPCT. At the collection points DBS packages are mailed to Arthur Davidson Children's Hospital using Expedited Mail System (EMS) with the Zambia Postal Services. PCR results are then sent back to PMTCT sites in the reverse direction.

EID is recommended at age 6-weeks postnatal then at ages six months and 12 months to all HIV-exposed infants. In reality, DBS samples are collected from children age six weeks to 18 months; this is partly due to the fact that EID is a relatively new component of PMTCT programs and there is still a substantial backlog of HIV-exposed children that remain to be tested. Routine PCR data benefit from strong data quality assurance and represent an important opportunity to assess MTCT rates among HIV-exposed children.

DNA PCR testing methodology

Testing is performed on 5 mm disks of the DBS which are punched into sterile 2 mL cryovials and washed in specimen wash solution for 30 minutes twice to remove hemoglobin. Working extraction solution, a detergent solution containing proteinase K and HIV-1 internal control (IC), is then used to extract and lyse the DNA containing leucocytes from the disks. 50 uL of the extracted DNA solution is added to an equal volume of working mastermix and then amplified for 35 cycles with a final hold stage at 72° centigrade for 15 minutes at which the amplified products are denatured. Denatured amplicon is hybridized in separate HIV-1 and HIV-1 IC target specific probe coated microwell plates, washed in buffer, conjugated to Avidin-Horseradish Peroxidase, washed again and a substrate added to give a colored complex. Stop solution is added to the colored complex after 10 minutes incubation and detection is completed by colorimetric reading at 450 nm. Any value<0.2 A450 are considered negative, ≥0.2 A450 and <0.8 A450 are considered indeterminate and ≥0.8 A450 are positive. Duplicate repeat testing is performed on indeterminate specimen and results interpreted using 0.2 A450 as the cutoff point.

Design

This is a descriptive observational study of HIV EID activities. This study analyzed all DNA PCR results and PMTCT data from perinatally exposed children 0 to 12 months of age seen at the Arthur Davidson Children's Hospital. There was no sample selection; all PCR results and PMTCT data available were considered in this analysis. Children lived from the five provinces supported by ZPCT – Central, Copperbelt, Luapula, North-Western, and Northern Provinces – between September 2007 and July 2010. This study is an update of an earlier analysis which covered the period between September 2007 and January 2009 [6], [7].

Data collection, entry and analysis

Health care workers at maternal, neonatal and child health (MNCH) units routinely collected dry blood spots (DBS) for PCR tests for all babies that were perinatally exposed to HIV. They completed PCR requisition forms to accompany the DBS samples. Information on any PMTCT service offered – e.g. type of ARV regimen received by mother and baby, infant feeding method, disclosure of HIV status – was also recorded on the PCR requisition form. The DBS PCR requisition forms were populated with data from the mother's antenatal card and child's “under-5” cards. The client information collected included age of the child at the time of DBS collection, maternal age, feeding method, type of ARV regimen given to mother and/or baby, mode of delivery, and whether the mother disclosed her HIV-positive status to her partner.

In the PCR laboratory, a Microsoft Access database was used to store and process data from the PCR requisition forms and the PCR results. Internal accuracy and consistency of the data were regularly assessed. Electronic data were verified against paper records and cleaned as appropriate. Repeat samples were excluded from the analysis.

The MTCT rates were estimated, along with 95% confidence intervals, separately for each age group and for specific PMTCT interventions received by mothers and children. Mantel-Haenszel methods were used to study the associations between vertical transmission of HIV and chemoprophylactic and non-chemoprophylactic factors controlling for province as a stratification factor. All p-values should be interpreted as descriptive measures of association rather than as inferential statistics applicable to a larger population. A multiple logistic regression model was applied to assess the associations between vertical transmission rates and both ARV related and non-ARV related interventions and population characteristics. The model also controlled for the ARV regimen received by the mother. From this model, we estimated odds ratios along with 95% confidence intervals separately for each age group. Missing data were ignored. Analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

To assess changes in PMTCT implementation over time, we compared the rates of positive PCR results between 1) DBS samples collected from September 2007 to January 2009, and 2) those collected from February 2009 to July 2010. We also assessed changes in the population characteristics between these two periods.

Ethical approval

Ethical Approval was granted by the University of Zambia Research and Ethics Committee as well as by the Protection of Human Subjects Committee of FHI 360, North Carolina, USA with final clearance from the Ministry of Health, Zambia.

Results

Study population

In total, the study analyzed data from 28,320 babies aged between 0 and 12 months covering the period September 2007 to July 2010. The children came from 317 facilities in 40 districts across five provinces. (Table 1). Previously published analyses included data for 8,237 of these babies [6], [7].

Table 1
Mother and child characteristics.

Half of the infants were male. The majority of children (58.6%) had a PCR test conducted between age six weeks and six months; 71.5% received ARVs prophylaxis; 82.0%were delivered in health facilities (HF) without C-section and 86.4% were ever breastfed. Of those who ever breastfed, 96.2% were still breastfeeding at age six weeks and 52.8% at age six months. Exclusive breastfeeding (56.8%) was the most frequent feeding method as reported by mothers followed by mixed feeding (22%).

The majority of mothers were below 30 years old (45.9%). Most women disclosed their HIV-positive status (93.3%). Among mothers, 32.7% received AZT+sdNVP, 30.9% received HAART, 19.6% received sdNVP only, and 12.9% did not receive ARVs.

In comparing the time period September 2007–January 2006 to the time period February 2009–July 2010, the most noticeable changes were: 1) an increase in proportion of mothers that received the combination AZT+sdNVP – from 24.5% to 36.2%, and 2) a decrease in proportion of mothers that received sdNVP only – from 18.0% to 10.6%.

Overall frequency of positive PCR

Of the 28,320 PCR tests performed, 3,481 (12.2%) were positive and 4 (<0.1%) were indeterminate. The overall percentages of positive PCR in age groups zero to six weeks, six weeks to six months and six to 12 months were 7.1%, 11.4% and 20.5% respectively.

Frequency of positive PCR by those who received ARVs and type of ARV regimen

Across each age group, the rate of positive PCR varied with 1) whether the mother and/or the child received ARV drugs and 2) the type of ARV regimen received by the mother. Tables 2 and and33 provide details on the transmission rates and the 95% confidence intervals by age groups.

Table 2
Rate of positive PCR by “who received ARV drugs”, mothers' ARV regimen, mothers' age at the time of delivery, HIV status disclosure, and by children's age group.
Table 3
Rate of positive PCR by feeding mode, place and type of delivery, and by children's age group.

Frequency of positive PCR by place and type of delivery

Across all age groups, the rate of positive PCR results was significantly highest when the child was delivered at home, followed by when delivered by C-section at health facility (HF), and lowest when children were delivered vaginally at health facility. For example, in age groups zero to six weeks, when born vaginally at home, vaginally at a health facility, or by C-section at health facility, the rate of positive PCR results was 12.9%, 6.7% and 3.5% respectively, (p-value<0.001).

Frequency of positive PCR by mother age

Across all age groups, when both mother and infant received ARVs, the rate of positive PCR results was significantly lower when the child was born to a mother who is 30 year or older (Table 2).

Frequency of positive PCR by disclosure of HIV-positive status

The rate of a child's positive PCR result was lower when mothers disclosed their HIV-positive to their partners, as compared to when they did not (Table 2). The difference was significant in the age groups of six weeks to 6 months and 6 months to 12 months. This remains true whether infants or mother only received ARVs or when both mother and infants received an ARV regimen.

Comparing ARV exposures and non ARV-related parameters

Estimating Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Intervals) for ARV exposures and non ARV-related parameters we found that across all ages, the lowest rate of positive PCR test results was associated with 1) both mother and infant or mother alone received ARVs versus neither, 2) children never breastfed versus children still breastfeeding at the time of DBS collection, and 3) mother being 30 or older (Table 4).

Table 4
Estimated Adjusted Odds Ratio and 95% Confidence Intervals for ARV exposures and non ARV-related parameters.

Frequency of positive PCR rates overtime

Between September 2007 and January 2009, and between February 2009 and July 2010, the overall proportions of positive PCR were 15.1% and 11% respectively.

By age group, regardless of whether infants received ARVs or not, when mothers received ARV drugs, the proportion of positive PCR results was lower in the later of the time periods mentioned above. Differences were significant in the age groups 6weeks–6 months and 6–12 months. (Table 5).

Table 5
Rate of positive PCR by time period of DBS collection and by children's age group.

Discussion

Analysis of data from PMTCT program implementation showed a reduced risk of MTCT (3.5 to 12.9%) compared to when to when ARVs are not provided (15 to 45%) [10]. Our finding is comparable to those in many other publications [11], [12], [13], [14]. We had a similar finding when we previously analyzed a smaller subset of the same data presented here [6], [7].

Compared to the previous analysis, we observed a lower rate of MTCT [6]. (Table 5. This change is more likely an indication that PMTCT programs were better implemented over time. Between September 2007 and July 2010, the proportions of 1) mothers accessing efficacious regimens had increased; and 2) mothers and infants receiving no ARVs or sdNVP only had decreased. (Table 1).

In 2000, HIVNET and SAINT studies found a six week MTCT rate of 11.8% and 12.3% respectively using sdNVP compared to 8.7% in our study [15], [16]. Unlike these studies that reviewed a sdNVP only regimen, this papers presents the analysis of a mixture of the sdNVP only regimen and other more efficacious ARV regimens. Our results show the rate of MTCT in the group that received an AZT-based ARV regimen was similar to the MTCT rates found in the DITRAME Plus study in Cote D'Ivoire [17]. The overall MTCT rate in our analysis was also affected by the substantial proportion of mothers and/or infants that did not actually receive ARVs. The majority of these were in the early phase of the early infant diagnosis program where access to PMTCT services was limited.

Although in our population, breastfeeding was the common feeding method, the rates of MTCT that were observed compare with MTCT rates observed in clinical trials where the majority of babies were predominantly formula-fed. For example, Creek et al in Botswana found a 5% MTCT rate at eight weeks postnatal [18]. In our analysis, MTCT rates vary between 4.2% (when mothers received HAART) and 8.7% (when mothers received sdNVP only.

The major contribution of our study is to show how analysis of routine program data can be a useful tool for assessing the outcome of a PMTCT program and by doing so, help adjust or fine-tune program implementation in an evidence-informed way. Our analysis highlighted how MTCT is significantly reduced when ARVs are used. Furthermore, it showed how the use of ARV regimens that maximally suppress viral replication can reduce the risk of MTCT. The use of ARVs remains the cornerstone of PMTCT interventions and combined ARVs were associated with even greater reduction of MTCT. Indeed we observed better PMTCT outcomes when mother initiated lifelong ART or other combined ARVs than when sdNVP was the only regimen implemented. This is a call for programs to strive for implementing the most highly efficacious regimen possible [9], [19].

ARV based interventions, although critical, are only part of PMTCT programs. Our analysis unveiled how non-ARV related interventions were also associated with the rate of MTCT in the target population. The age of mothers at the time of delivery was associated with the rate of MTCT observed.

We found an increment of the overall MTCT rate between the zero to six weeks and six months to 12 months age group. We observed that the increment of crude MTCT rates between the zero to six weeks age group and six weeks to six months group was 4.3%, comparable to 4.5% increment found by the Mashi study [20]. The increasing rate can be attributed to postnatal transmission.

Furthermore, our data showed that 52.8% of the mothers were still breastfeeding (including mixed feeding) after 12 months. This is a call for PMTCT programs to urgently implement interventions that reduce risk of MTCT during the breastfeeding period [9], [21], [22], [23]. This recommendation is further supported by a pooled analysis of five randomized controlled trials which employed extended use of nevirapine and AZT during the breastfeeding period, which found a 70% reduction in the MTCT rate [20]. In our study population, replacement feeding is usually not an option because of acceptability, feasibility, affordability, safety and sustainability concerns [24]. The WHO Update on ARV options for PMTCT comes timely [25]. In addition to other ARVs regimens, countries like Zambia have a larger choice including lifelong triple ARV combination (or “option B+”). More HIV-positive mothers are covered by ARV therapy, especially during breastfeeding period to reduce the risk of MTCT in postnatal period.

In the univariate analysis, we observed that higher rate of MTCT was associated with 1) mother and newborn not receiving ARVs, 2) home delivery, 3) not breastfeeding, 4) being born to a mother younger than 30 years of age, and 5) mother not disclosing her HIV-status. The association was significant in the age groups six weeks to six months and six months to 12 months. In the multivariate analysis, of the above five parameters adjusted for ARV regimens, only 1) mother and newborn not receiving ARVs, 2) breastfeeding and 3) being born to a mother younger than 30 years of age were associated with the highest MTCT rates. The association noticed here was stronger compared to our previous analysis [7]. This is more likely due to the smaller sample size of the previous analysis.

Although there is no plausible direct causal link, we believe that each of the three parameters – place of delivery, disclosure of HIV positive status, and mother's age – do influence adherence to ARVs regimen, infant feeding practices, or counseling offered during PMTCT interventions. Several studies have found that male partners or family influence women's choices about infant feeding methods or adherence to an ARV regimen [26], [27], [28], [29]. Mother's age or whether she had disclosed her HIV-positive status may determine how her partner or family would influence her infant feeding choice and adherence. In our analysis, we found that the influence of HIV-status disclosure on MTCT rate was significant after the 6th week postnatal period, which is a time when the infant feeding method affects the mother–to-child transmission of HIV. These results suggest that a critical look of the non-medical aspects of PMTCT implementation be taken. For example, mothers younger than 30 years might need more adherence or infant feeding counseling than older mothers. Additionally, efforts to increase adherence to PMTCT regimens should incorporate support for disclosing HIV status to the partners when it does not put the mothers' life in danger.

Our study had also contributed to the performance and quality of PMTCT in the five provinces where these data come from. It provided an opportunity to analyze PMTCT activities, study the provision and immediate outcomes of services and consequently improve them.

Our study has similar limitations to those described in our previous analysis [6], [7]. HIV exposed children that did not show up for EID might be the very ones that were infected and/or died. These children were counted neither in the numerator nor the denominator, thus the MTCT rate that our study reports might be an underestimation of the true MTCT rate.

Furthermore, given the repeated cross-sectional nature of our data, we are unable to distinguish any effects of age from cohort or history effects; for example, the effect of age is masked with any changes in PMTCT regimens that occurred over time. In addition, using observational data precludes making strong causal statements when comparing estimates of transmission rates.

Conclusion

The use of ARV drugs reduces vertical transmission of HIV in a program setting. However non chemoprophylactic factors especially breastfeeding has a significant effect on postnatal HIV transmission. The overall change in the proportions of positive PCR over time is more likely an indication of improved PMTCT implementation. Determination of the impact of these programmatic interventions is feasible and requires accurate documentation and analysis.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mark Weaver for conducting statistical analysis and Rebecca Dirks for copyediting the manuscript.

Funding Statement

Support for this paper was provided by Family Health International/Zambia with funding from the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through U.S. Agency for International Development Cooperative Agreement No. 690-A-00-04-00319-00. The funder played no role in design, data collection and analysis.

References

1. UNAIDS (2011) World AIDS Day Report. Geneva.
2. Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J (2003) Where and why are 10 million children dying every year? Lancet 361: 2226–2234 [PubMed]
3. WHO, UNAIDS, UNICEF (2010) Towards Universal Access: Scaling up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector. Progress report. Geneva.
4. UNICEF, WHO, UNAIDS, Medecine VSo (2009) Consultative Meeting on Evaluating the Impact of Prevention of Mother-To-Child Transmission of HIV (PMTCT) Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Averting New HIV Infections in Children and Improving Child Survival. Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
5. Stringer EM, Chi BH, Chintu N, Creek TL, Ekouevi DK, et al. (2008) Monitoring effectiveness of programmes to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission in lower-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 86: 57–62 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Torpey K, Kasonde P, Kabaso M, Weaver MA, Bryan G, et al. (2010) Reducing pediatric HIV infection: estimating mother-to-child transmission rates in a program setting in Zambia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 54: 415–422 [PubMed]
7. Torpey K, Kabaso M, Weaver MA, Kasonde P, Mukonka V, et al. (2011) Infant Feeding Options, Other Nonchemoprophylactic Factors, and Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Zambia. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic) 11: 26–33 [PubMed]
8. Zambia (2010) National Protocol Guidelines for Integrated Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission of HIV. Lusaka, Zambia: Ministry of Health.
9. WHO (2010) Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating Pregnant Women and Preventing HIV Infection in Infants: Recommendations for a Public Health Approach. Geneva.
10. De Cock KM, Fowler MG, Mercier E, de Vincenzi I, Saba J, et al. (2000) Prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission in resource-poor countries: translating research into policy and practice. JAMA 283: 1175–1182 [PubMed]
11. Rollins N, Little K, Mzolo S, Horwood C, Newell ML (2007) Surveillance of mother-to-child transmission prevention programmes at immunization clinics: the case for universal screening. AIDS 21: 1341–1347 [PubMed]
12. Coetzee D, Hilderbrand K, Boulle A, Draper B, Abdullah F, et al. (2005) Effectiveness of the first district-wide programme for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in South Africa. Bull World Health Organ 83: 489–494 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Sherman GG, Jones SA, Coovadia AH, Urban MF, Bolton KD (2004) PMTCT from research to reality–results from a routine service. S Afr Med J 94: 289–292 [PubMed]
14. Malyuta R, Newell ML, Ostergren M, Thorne C, Zhilka N (2006) Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection: Ukraine experience to date. Eur J Public Health 16: 123–127 [PubMed]
15. Guay LA, Musoke P, Fleming T, Bagenda D, Allen M, et al. (1999) Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET 012 randomised trial. Lancet 354: 795–802 [PubMed]
16. Moodley D, Moodley J, Coovadia H, Gray G, McIntyre J, et al. (2003) A multicenter randomized controlled trial of nevirapine versus a combination of zidovudine and lamivudine to reduce intrapartum and early postpartum mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Infect Dis 187: 725–735 [PubMed]
17. Dabis F, Bequet L, Ekouevi DK, Viho I, Rouet F, et al. (2005) Field efficacy of zidovudine, lamivudine and single-dose nevirapine to prevent peripartum HIV transmission. AIDS 19: 309–318 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Creek T, Tanuri A, Smith M, Seipone K, Smit M, et al. (2008) Early diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus in infants using polymerase chain reaction on dried blood spots in Botswana's national program for prevention of mother-to-child transmission. Pediatr Infect Dis J 27: 22–26 [PubMed]
19. WHO (2010) PMTCT Strategic Vision 2010–2015. Preventing mother-to-child transmissionof HIV to reach the UNGASS and Millenium Development Goals. Moving towards the Elimination of Pediatric HIV. Geneva.
20. Thior I, Lockman S, Smeaton LM, Shapiro RL, Wester C, et al. (2006) Breastfeeding plus infant zidovudine prophylaxis for 6 months vs formula feeding plus infant zidovudine for 1 month to reduce mother-to-child HIV transmission in Botswana: a randomized trial: the Mashi Study. JAMA 296: 794–805 [PubMed]
21. de Vincenzi I (2011) Group KBS (2011) Triple antiretroviral compared with zidovudine and single-dose nevirapine prophylaxis during pregnancy and breastfeeding for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 (Kesho Bora study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 11: 171–180 [PubMed]
22. Kumwenda NI, Hoover DR, Mofenson LM, Thigpen MC, Kafulafula G, et al. (2008) Extended antiretroviral prophylaxis to reduce breast-milk HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med 359: 119–129 [PubMed]
23. Bedri A, Gudetta B, Isehak A, Kumbi S, Lulseged S, et al. (2008) Extended-dose nevirapine to 6 weeks of age for infants to prevent HIV transmission via breastfeeding in Ethiopia, India, and Uganda: an analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet 372: 300–313 [PubMed]
24. WHO, UNAIDS, UNFPA, UNICEF (2010) Guidelines on HIV and Infant Feeding. Principles and recommendations for infant feeding in the context of HIV and a summary of evidence. [PubMed]
25. WHO (2012) Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating Pregnant Women and Preventing HIV Infection in Infants. Programatic Update. Geneva.
26. Ostergaard LR, Bula A (2010) “They call our children “Nevirapine babies?””: A qualitative study about exclusive breastfeeding among HIV positive mothers in Malawi. Afr J Reprod Health 14: 213–222 [PubMed]
27. Maru S, Datong P, Selleng D, Mang E, Inyang B, et al. (2009) Social determinants of mixed feeding behavior among HIV-infected mothers in Jos, Nigeria. AIDS Care 21: 1114–1123 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Matovu A, Kirunda B, Rugamba-Kabagambe G, Tumwesigye NM, Nuwaha F (2008) Factors influencing adherence to exclusive breast feeding among HIV positive mothers in Kabarole district, Uganda. East Afr Med J 85: 162–170 [PubMed]
29. Msuya SE, Mbizvo EM, Hussain A, Uriyo J, Sam NE, et al. (2008) Low male partner participation in antenatal HIV counselling and testing in northern Tanzania: implications for preventive programs. AIDS Care 20: 700–709 [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...