• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Bioconjug Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jun 29, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3386608
NIHMSID: NIHMS387058

A Wortmannin-Cetuximab As A Double Drug

Abstract

Double drugs are obtained when two pharmacologically active entities are covalently joined to improve potency. We conjugated the viridin Wm with a self-activating linkage to cetuximab and demonstrated the retention of immunoreactivity by the conjugate. Though cetuximab lacked a growth inhibitory activity against A549 cells, the Wmcetuximab conjugate had an anti-proliferative IC50 of 155 nM in vitro. The chemistry of attaching a self-releasing Wm to clinically approved antibodies is general and, in selected instances, may yield antibody-based double drugs with improved efficacy.

Introduction

Double drugs are obtained when two pharmacologically active entities are covalently joined to obtain a molecule with an improved potency that often results from a change in physical properties of one of the active entities(1, 2). The ability of modified viridins like wortmannin (Wm) to self-activate by generating the active species Wm, offers a mechanism for the design of self-activating viridin double drugs, where X (Figure 1A) is a pharmacologically active entity. We have previously shown that when X is a 70 kDa dextran, a pharmacologically inactive carrier, the resulting self-activating viridin (SAV) prodrug has an improved antiproliferative activity compared to wortmannin (Wm) due to the slow release of active Wm over the 48 h incubation period of the in vitro antiproliferative assay(3). This slow release also occurs in vivo, evident by the nanomolar concentrations of active viridin generated by micromolar concentrations of circulating SAV prodrug(4). The SAV prodrug is anti-inflammatory in animal models of lung inflammation and arthritis(5, 6), as well as being cytostatic in the A549 xenograft model(4).

Figure 1
Self-activation of WmC20 derivatives and the compounds used

Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the epidermal growth factor receptor, ErbB1, and generates an antitumor activity through several mechanisms, including an antagonism of growth stimulation by growth factors, and immune mediated mechanisms such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and complement-dependent cytolysis CDC(79). Consistent with a role for immune mediated mechanisms in cetuximab's in vivo activity, cetuximab does not directly inhibit the proliferation of some cultured tumor cell lines, such as the A549 cell line used here(1012).

We hypothesized that attaching wortmannin (Wm) to cetuximab using a self-activating linker employed with dextran-based SAV (compound 5a of the current study) might yield a potentially general conjugation chemistry for the design monoclonal antibody based double-drugs. A key pharmacokinetic property of blood half-life is comparable for the two materials, with human blood half-lives of 60–80 h for a 70 kDa dextran in humans(13, 14) and 112h for cetuximab(15). Thus it appeared that cetuximab, like a 70 kDa dextran, could serve as a reservoir of inactive Wm that slowly self-activated to yield the active species Wm, as we have shown on other occasions(3, 4, 16). We therefore hypothesized that cetuximab might serve as carrier for Wm, enhancing the antibody's antiproliferative activity and acting as a double drug.

Experimental Methods

Reagents

Wortmannin (Wm) was a gift of the natural products branch of the National Cancer Institute. Fluorescein labeled goat anti-human IgG (secondary antibody) was from Beckman Coulter. The NHS ester of 6-fluorescein-5-(and 6)-carboxamidohexanoic acid (FAM) was from Molecular Probes.

Syntheses

The compounds employed are summarized in Figure 1. To obtain the self-activating Wm-cetuximab (7a), 2a was synthesized and converted to the NHS ester of 2a(3). To a solution of the NHS ester of 2a (4 mg, 6 mmol) in DMSO (100 μL), was added 160 kDa monoclonal antibody cetuximab (3ml, 10mg/ml) in PBS. The solution was stirred and incubated at 37°C for 1.5hr. The conjugate (7a) was purified with Sephadex G-50 in a 1 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 followed by lyophilization. The number of moles of Wm per cetuximab were determined by its absorbance at 418 nm. Compound 7b was prepared from 2b in a similar fashion. The syntheses of 5a and 5b, which use a 70 kDa amino dextran carrier, have been described(3). The moles of Wm attached per mole of carrier were 4.5 (7a), 8.8 (7b), 7.8 (5a) and 13 (5b). To obtain the fluorescent compound 8, cetuximab (1mL, 2 mg) was diluted with 1M sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 8.3, 100μL). 3.91μL of 5-FAM (10 mg/mL in DMSO) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The mixture was purified with PD10 column. Antibody concentration was determined by the BCA assay while attached fluorescein was determined from its absorbance at 493 nm. There were 3.19 moles of fluorescein per mole of cetuximab.

Assays

All experiments used A549 cells (ATCC). Cells were maintained in F12-K medium, 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibiotics of penicillin-streptomycin at 37°C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity. To obtain antibody binding, cells were seeded at a density of 50,000 cells/well in 24-well culture plates and incubated overnight. Dilutions of antibodies in complete media (500 μL/well) were added. After incubation at 37°C, cells were washed three times with HBSS, detached with trypsin, centrifuged (5 min at 200×g), resuspended (200 μL cold HBSS), and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton-Dickinson). Binding is expressed as the relative cellular fluorescence (RCF), which is the mean fluorescence intensity of treated cells divided by a similar value for untreated cells. To demonstrate immunoreactive cetuximab on the cell surface, cells were treated with cetuximab (37 °C, 10 nM, 1 h) and washed. Then, 500 μL of fresh media was added to each well and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 or 24 h. Cells were then detached by trypsinization, centrifuged, and resuspended in 100 μL FITC-labeled secondary antibody solution (50:1 dilution in HBSS). After 1 h incubation on ice, cells were washed three times with fresh HBSS and prepared for flow cytometry analysis as described above.

The amount of compound 8 bound per cell at saturation (10 nM) was determined as immunoreactive fluorescein using a fluorescein immunoassay(17). A sulforhodamine B (SRB) dye binding method was performed as an antiproliferative assay(18). Cells were allowed to proliferate for 48 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of drug as shown in Figure 3, where the drug concentration (x-axis) was plotted versus cell mass (y-axis). The IC50 is determined using a four parameter equation (GraphPad Prism software) setting the maximum value as 100% and allowing the fit to generate a minimum non-zero cell mass value (the asymptote at high drug concentrations). Based on the reported doubling time of A549 of 22.9 h (http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/docs/misc/common_files/cell_list.html), complete growth inhibition would yield a cell mass of about 25% of control after the assay's 48 h incubation. The IC50, therefore, is the mid-range point for the change in cell mass (and not the point where cell mass is 50% of control). We term this an “antiproliferative assay” because it is run under conditions allowing cell proliferation, though no direct measurements of cell division were obtained.

Figure 3
Increase in Potency for the double drug, Wm-cetuximab

Results and Discussion

The self-activation the viridin Wm undergoes when modified at the C20 position by N-methyl hexanoic acid is shown in Figure 1A. An intramolecular attack of the C6 OH generates Wm, while the carboxyl group can be reacted with amines. WmC20 derivatives featuring a secondary amine at C20 (2a) and a tertiary amine at C20 (2b) were converted to NHS esters and attached to the amino groups of amino-dextran, to yield 5a and 5b, or to the amino groups of cetuximab to yield 7a and 7b. The compound designations shown in Figure 1B are from our previous communications, with our new cetuximab based compounds designated as 7a, 7b and 8. Thus 2a, 2b, 5a and 5b are the same as in our earlier publications, with the “a” designation referring to an N(Me) hexanoic acid, self-activating linker reacted with Wm's C20. The “b” designation refers to N(H)hexanoic acid based compounds which do not self-activate due to an extra hydrogen bond stabilization shown in Figure 1B(3, 16).

To determine whether the attachment of Wm to cetuximab (as in 7a and 7b) resulted in a reduced immunoreactivity, a self-displacement assay (Figure 2C) was employed. However, we first characterized the binding of the fluorescein labeled 8 to cells as shown in Figures 2A and 2B. Binding of 8 was determined as the relative cell fluorescence (RCF), that is the mean fluorescence intensity determined by FACS of cells incubated with 8 divided the mean fluorescence intensity of control cells. Preliminary experiments indicated the binding of 8 to cells was rapid and independent of incubation times between 1 and 24 hours. We then varied the concentration of 8, and determined a Kd of 0.40 nM as shown in Figure 2A. The amount of 8 bound per cell at a saturating concentration of 10 nM was determined by a fluorescein hapten immunoassay to be 56,400 ± 14,200 molecules per cell. Our estimate of the number of binding sites per cell was about 10 fold higher than Mukohara who used a FACS based bead method(12), while we measured immunoreactive fluorescein from 8 after cell lysis.

Figure 2
Binding of Fl-cetuximab (8) and Wm-cetuximab (7a) to cells

With the concentration dependence and number of binding sites for 8 binding to cells in hand, we determined the immunoreactivity of the Wm modified centuximab 7a by its ability to displace the binding of 8 (10 nM) from cells (Figure 2B). The similar decrease (p>0.05 for all concentrations) in RCF produced by 7a and cetuximab indicated the attachment of Wm to cetuximab, as occurred with 7a, did not impair its immunoreactivity.

A surprising feature of the binding of 8 to A549 cells was lack of time dependence of this binding, which suggested that 8 remained as a stable complex bound to its ErbB1 target receptor on the cell surface. To verify that this was in fact the case, we incubated cells with cetuximab (10 nM, 1 h), washed cells, and detected cell surface cetuximab by the addition of a fluorescein labeled goat anti-Human IgG. As shown in Figure 3C, the RCF was essentially constant for 6 hours and decreased to 50.6 % of control at 24 h. A 50% decrease in cell fluorescence would be expected at 22.9 hours based on the doubling time of A549 cells, see above. Thus cetuximab appears not to be internalized by A549 cells.

We next assessed the antiproliferative activity of the Wm-cetuximab conjugates (7a, 7b), with the dextran conjugates featuring the same linkages (5a, 5b) serving as non-receptor binding Wm controls. Representative curves for the decrease in cell mass as a function of concentration are shown in Figure 3A and 3B with IC50's provided in Table 1. Cetuximab had no effect on the proliferation of A549 cells, consistent with the observations of others(12, 19, 20), though cetuximab has been shown to inhibit the growth of A549 xenografts (10, 11), an effect that may reflect immune mediated killing, see above. Based on the similar IC50's of 5a and 7a (Table 1), 5a and 7a release Wm into the media in a similar manner (Figures 3C and 3D). Based on the lack of internalization of cetuximab (Figure 2), 7a was not internalized (Figure 3D).

Table 1
Antiproliferative Activity Of Wortmannin-Cetuximab Conjugates

The antiproliferative activity of cetuximab was greatly enhanced by the attachment of Wm with a self-releasing linkage. That compound, 7a, exhibited an IC50 of 153 nM on a per mole cetuximab basis (690 nM on a Wm basis at 4.5 Wm/per mole of cetuximab), while cetuximab lacked activity in this assay. This improvement in antiproliferative activity of 7a relative to cetuximab was not due an immune mediated binding of 7a, since the IC50 of the self-activating dextran (5a) was 700 nM on a wortmannin basis, and not different from the IC50 of 7a (p>0.05). With both cetuximab and dextran carriers, the configuration at C20 was critical for activity, with non-releasing C20 configurations of 5b and 7b showing no antiproliferative activity. The potency of Wm was greatly increased by its attachment to cetuximab with the self-releasing linkage. Wm has an IC50 of 11.4 μM against A549 cells, while 7a had an IC50 of 690 nM on a per mole of Wm basis.

There are two conclusions from these studies. First, Wm could be attached to cetuximab at levels that did not affect its immunoreactivity but increased its antiproliferative activity. The experimental approach developed here, attachment of Wm followed by verification of immunoreactivity, could be employed to obtain slowly Wm releasing, immunologically active, monoclonal antibodies. Second, the attachment of Wm to cetuximab increased the antiproliferative activity of both the antibody and Wm. This improvement occurred through the slow release of Wm into culture media, based on the similar antiproliferative IC50 of 5a and 7a.

Though we did not demonstrate the immune mediated targeting of Wm to A549 cells in culture, this may still be possible in vivo with appropriate antibody/tumor combinations. The A549 we employed is a Ras driven tumor(21, 22), and the amount of Wm that must targeted to achieve a pharmacological effect might be considerably higher than for PI3 kinase driven tumors, see(23, 24). In addition, our Wm-cetuximab was not internalized by A549 cells, a fate common with cetuximab and other cell lines(25). Internalization of Wm-monoclonal antibodies and receptor recycling might lead to higher intracellular levels of Wm. Finally, a self-releasing Wm antibody might be attached to a monoclonal antibody or protein with an immune suppressive activity, which would then act as a pharmacologically active (but non-targeting) carrier for a slow Wm release. The slow release of Wm from 5a is immune suppressive in an animal models of lung inflammation and arthritis(5, 6). Wm is a potent antiangiogenic agent(26), offering a mechanism for immune suppression or inhibiting tumor growth without targeting.

From 1980 to 2005 some 206 monoclonal antibodies were studied in clinical trials with 12 being approved(27), offering a wide array of potential Wm-antibody double drugs. The conjugation of Wm with a self-activating linker to an approved monoclonal antibody offers a potentially general chemistry for the design of double drugs, the pharmacological effectiveness of which will have to be evaluated for each antibody considered.

References

(1) Matsumoto H, Hamawaki T, Ota H, Kimura T, Goto T, Sano K, Hayashi Y, Kiso Y. 'Double-Drugs'--a new class of prodrug form of an HIV protease inhibitor conjugated with a reverse transcriptase inhibitor by a spontaneously cleavable linker. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2000;10:1227–31. [PubMed]
(2) Romeo S, Parapini S, Dell'Agli M, Vaiana N, Magrone P, Galli G, Sparatore A, Taramelli D, Bosisio E. Atovaquone-statine “double-drugs” with high antiplasmodial activity. ChemMedChem. 2008;3:418–20. [PubMed]
(3) Blois J, Yuan H, Smith A, Pacold ME, Weissleder R, Cantley LC, Josephson L. Slow self-activation enhances the potency of viridin prodrugs. J Med Chem. 2008;51:4699–707. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(4) Smith A, Blois J, Yuan H, Aikawa E, Ellson C, Figueiredo JL, Weissleder R, Kohler R, Yaffe MB, Cantley LC, Josephson L. The antiproliferative cytostatic effects of a self-activating viridin prodrug. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:1666–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(5) Cortez-Retamozo V, Swirski FK, Waterman P, Yuan H, Figueiredo JL, Newton AP, Upadhyay R, Vinegoni C, Kohler R, Blois J, Smith A, Nahrendorf M, Josephson L, Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. Real-time assessment of inflammation and treatment response in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:4058–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(6) Stangenberg L, Ellson C, Cortez-Retamozo V, Ortiz-Lopez A, Yuan H, Blois J, Smith RA, Yaffe MB, Weissleder R, Benoist C, Mathis D, Josephson L, Mahmood U. Abrogation of antibody-induced arthritis in mice by a self-activating viridin prodrug and association with impaired neutrophil and endothelial cell function. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:2314–2324. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(7) Yan L, Hsu K, Beckman RA. Antibody-based therapy for solid tumors. Cancer J. 2008;14:178–83. [PubMed]
(8) Kurai J, Chikumi H, Hashimoto K, Yamaguchi K, Yamasaki A, Sako T, Touge H, Makino H, Takata M, Miyata M, Nakamoto M, Burioka N, Shimizu E. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity mediated by cetuximab against lung cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1552–61. [PubMed]
(9) Adams GP, Weiner LM. Monoclonal antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:1147–57. [PubMed]
(10) Steiner P, Joynes C, Bassi R, Wang S, Tonra JR, Hadari YR, Hicklin DJ. Tumor growth inhibition with cetuximab and chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer xenografts expressing wild-type and mutated epidermal growth factor receptor. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1540–51. [PubMed]
(11) Wild R, Fager K, Flefleh C, Kan D, Inigo I, Castaneda S, Luo FR, Camuso A, McGlinchey K, Rose WC. Cetuximab preclinical antitumor activity (monotherapy and combination based) is not predicted by relative total or activated epidermal growth factor receptor tumor expression levels. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:104–13. [PubMed]
(12) Mukohara T, Engelman JA, Hanna NH, Yeap BY, Kobayashi S, Lindeman N, Halmos B, Pearlberg J, Tsuchihashi Z, Cantley LC, Tenen DG, Johnson BE, Janne PA. Differential effects of gefitinib and cetuximab on non-small-cell lung cancers bearing epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1185–94. [PubMed]
(13) Klotz U, Kroemer H. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations in the use of plasma expanders. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1987;12:123–35. [PubMed]
(14) Terg R, Miguez CD, Castro L, Araldi H, Dominguez S, Rubio M. Pharmacokinetics of Dextran-70 in patients with cirrhosis and ascites undergoing therapeutic paracentesis. Journal of Hepatology. 1996;25:329–333. [PubMed]
(15) Imclone, Squibb B-M. Erbitux Package Insert. Section 12.3 Pharmacokinetics
(16) Yuan H, Luo J, Weissleder R, Cantley L, Josephson L. Wortmannin-C20 conjugates generate wortmannin. J Med Chem. 2006;49:740–7. [PubMed]
(17) Kelly KA, Reynolds F, Weissleder R, Josephson L. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-hapten immunoassay for determination of peptide-cell interactions. Anal Biochem. 2004;330:181–5. [PubMed]
(18) Barnes KR, Blois J, Smith A, Yuan H, Reynolds F, Weissleder R, Cantley LC, Josephson L. Fate of a bioactive fluorescent wortmannin derivative in cells. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19:130–7. [PubMed]
(19) Kimura H, Sakai K, Arao T, Shimoyama T, Tamura T, Nishio K. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of cetuximab against tumor cells with wild-type or mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:1275–80. [PubMed]
(20) Raben D, Helfrich B, Chan DC, Ciardiello F, Zhao L, Franklin W, Baron AE, Zeng C, Johnson TK, Bunn PA., Jr. The effects of cetuximab alone and in combination with radiation and/or chemotherapy in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:795–805. [PubMed]
(21) Aoyama Y, Avruch J, Zhang XF. Nore1 inhibits tumor cell growth independent of Ras or the MST1/2 kinases. Oncogene. 2004;23:3426–33. [PubMed]
(22) Omerovic J, Hammond DE, Clague MJ, Prior IA. Ras isoform abundance and signalling in human cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 2008;27:2754–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(23) Zhao L, Vogt PK. Class I PI3K in oncogenic cellular transformation. Oncogene. 2008;27:5486–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(24) Engelman JA, Chen L, Tan X, Crosby K, Guimaraes AR, Upadhyay R, Maira M, McNamara K, Perera SA, Song Y, Chirieac LR, Kaur R, Lightbown A, Simendinger J, Li T, Padera RF, Garcia-Echeverria C, Weissleder R, Mahmood U, Cantley LC, Wong KK. Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat Med. 2008;14:1351–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(25) Vincenzi B, Schiavon G, Silletta M, Santini D, Tonini G. The biological properties of cetuximab. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;68:93–106. [PubMed]
(26) Oikawa T, Shimamura M. Potent inhibition of angiogenesis by wortmannin, a fungal metabolite. Eur J Pharmacol. 1996;318:93–6. [PubMed]
(27) Reichert JM, Valge-Archer VE. Development trends for monoclonal antibody cancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:349–56. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Links

  • Compound
    Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...