Logo of micLink to Publisher's site
Microbiology. 2012 Jan; 158(Pt 1): 107–118.
PMCID: PMC3352357

The seven-transmembrane receptor Gpr1 governs processes relevant for the antagonistic interaction of Trichoderma atroviride with its host

Monitoring Editor: N. L. Glass


Mycoparasitic Trichoderma species are applied as biocontrol agents in agriculture to guard plants against fungal diseases. During mycoparasitism, Trichoderma directly interacts with phytopathogenic fungi, preceded by a specific recognition of the host and resulting in its disarming and killing. In various fungal pathogens, including mycoparasites, signalling via heterotrimeric G proteins plays a major role in regulating pathogenicity-related functions. However, the corresponding receptors involved in the recognition of host-derived signals are largely unknown. Functional characterization of Trichoderma atroviride Gpr1 revealed a prominent role of this seven-transmembrane protein of the cAMP-receptor-like family of fungal G-protein-coupled receptors in the antagonistic interaction with the host fungus and governing of mycoparasitism-related processes. Silencing of gpr1 led to an avirulent phenotype accompanied by an inability to attach to host hyphae. Furthermore, gpr1-silenced transformants were unable to respond to the presence of living host fungi with the expression of chitinase- and protease-encoding genes. Addition of exogenous cAMP was able to restore host attachment in gpr1-silenced transformants but could not restore mycoparasitic overgrowth. A search for downstream targets of the signalling pathway(s) involving Gpr1 resulted in the isolation of genes encoding e.g. a member of the cyclin-like superfamily and a small secreted cysteine-rich protein. Although silencing of gpr1 caused defects similar to those of mutants lacking the Tga3 Gα protein, no direct interaction between Gpr1 and Tga3 was observed in a split-ubiquitin two-hybrid assay.


The genus Trichoderma includes species that are potent mycoparasites, able to attack and lyse plant pathogens such as Rhizoctonia solani, Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotium sclerotiorum, Pythium spp. and Fusarium spp. Trichoderma mycoparasitism involves a combination of host recognition, attachment to and coiling around the host hyphae, and the secretion of antibiotic metabolites and cell-wall-degrading enzymes (e.g. Elad et al., 1983; Baker, 1987; Chet et al., 1998; Hjeljord & Tronsmo, 1998). In addition, Trichoderma strains used as biocontrol agents are able to induce defence responses in plants (Harman et al., 2004).

Production of hydrolytic enzymes, such as chitinases, glucanases and proteases, plays a major role in mycoparasitism by Trichoderma as these enzymes degrade the cell wall of the host fungus to enable penetration of the mycoparasite (Hjeljord & Tronsmo, 1998). Besides the living host, isolated components of the fungal cell wall like chitin or the chitin monomer N-acetylglucosamine can also induce chitinase gene expression (Kubicek et al., 2001). Glycoproteins (e.g. lectins) located in the host’s cell wall induce coiling of the mycoparasite around host hyphae (Inbar & Chet, 1994). Both secretion of hydrolytic enzymes and host attachment/coiling therefore can be assumed to be induced responses triggered by host-derived molecules. Despite the significance of recognition in the interaction of fungal pathogens with their plant, animal, human or fungal hosts, there is only limited knowledge about receptors for host-derived signals. Intracellular signal transduction pathways are considered to regulate the expression of pathogenicity-related genes in response to the host. Recently, examination of these pathways in Trichoderma revealed the involvement of heterotrimeric G proteins in sensing of host signals and in activating mycoparasitic host attack (Rocha-Ramirez et al., 2002; Reithner et al., 2005; Zeilinger et al., 2005; Mukherjee et al., 2004, 2007). G protein signalling is a co-action of seven-transmembrane receptors (G-protein-coupled receptors, GPCRs), heterotrimeric G proteins and an effector, where GPCRs play an essential role in the recognition of extracellular signals (Neer, 1995). Representing one of the largest protein families found in nature (Lander et al., 2001), GPCRs do not share significant sequence similarity but have a common domain structure consisting of seven transmembrane helices connected by intra- and extracellular loops (Dohlman et al., 1991). Binding of a ligand to the receptor leads to a conformational change within the GPCR resulting in the activation of the G protein (Gutkind, 1998). However, little information is available on the characteristics and functions of fungal GPCRs other than pheromone receptors (e.g. Hagen et al., 1986; Blumer et al., 1988; Tanaka et al., 1993; Chang et al., 2003; Kim & Borkovich, 2004; Xue et al., 2006; Hsueh et al., 2009) and the role of these receptors in fungal pathogenicity is largely unknown. In the basidiomycete human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans the Cpra pheromone receptor was shown not only to be required for mating but also to play a significant role in virulence (Chang et al., 2003); in addition, the amino-acid-sensing GPCR Gpr4 was reported to be important for both mating and capsule production (Xue et al., 2006). Recent analysis of Aspergillus fumigatus GprC and GprD, which show sequence similarity to the Gpr1p glucose receptor from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, revealed that both receptors are essential regulators of colony growth, hyphal morphogenesis and virulence (Gehrke et al., 2010). In the plant pathogen Magnaporthe grisea, pth11 mutants lacking a CFEM-domain-containing seven-transmembrane protein were non-pathogenic due to a defect in appressorium differentiation (DeZwaan et al., 1999). We recently identified more than 50 putative GPCRs in the genome of Trichoderma reesei (Brunner et al., 2008) and, based on this analysis, isolated four genes from the mycoparasite Trichoderma atroviride encoding seven-transmembrane receptors of the cAMP-receptor-like (CRL) class.

In this study, we explore possible roles for the CRL protein Gpr1 of T. atroviride in order to better understand the signalling mechanisms that govern the mycoparasitic interaction with the host fungus. To this end, we isolated target genes of the signalling pathway(s) activated by Gpr1 and showed that gpr1-silenced transformants were avirulent in confrontation assays due to their inability to attach to and attack the host. Further analysis revealed that mycoparasitism-relevant processes such as chitinase and protease gene expression and attachment to host hyphae are governed by a functional Gpr1 protein. To our knowledge, Gpr1 is the first fungal member of the CRL class with pathogenicity-related functions and the first functionally characterized receptor of a mycoparasitic fungus. Our data highlight the fundamental role of Gpr1 during sensing of environmental signals and transduction to intracellular regulatory targets during the antagonist–host interaction.


Strains and culture conditions.

Trichoderma atroviride strain P1 (ATCC 74058; teleomorph Hypocrea atroviridis) was used for this study; it was maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 28 °C until sporulation. gpr1-silenced transformants were generated and purified by three rounds of single-spore isolation as described previously (Brunner et al., 2008). Due to inhomogeneous growth and conidiation, transformant gpr1 sil-2 was further purified by an additional round of single spore isolation, resulting in mutant gpr1 sil-2.1. Analysis of the silencing levels of the transformants was performed by real-time RT-PCR as described below using primers gpr1For and gpr1Rev (Table 1). sar1 was used as reference gene as described previously (Brunner et al., 2008). The transformants were maintained on PDA supplemented with 200 µg hygromycin B ml−1. Escherichia coli JM 109 was the host for plasmid amplification and was grown as described by Sambrook et al. (1989).

Table 1.
Oligonucleotides used in this study

For investigating the expression of mycoparasitism-related genes in liquid media, T. atroviride was grown in synthetic medium (SM), containing 2 % glycerol as carbon source, as described previously (Brunner et al., 2003). After 36 h the mycelia were transferred to SM containing 1 % (w/v) of either N-acetylglucosamine or colloidal chitin.

For determination of growth rates, fungi were inoculated at the centre of PDA plates and the colony diameters recorded every 24 h. Conidia were quantified by plating a freshly harvested and filtered spore suspension containing 1×106 conidia onto PDA plates and counting the conidia produced after 3 days of incubation at 28 °C. To test the influence of exogenous cAMP, 5 mM cAMP (Sigma) was added to PDA as this concentration was previously shown to result in the most pronounced effect on coiling in T. atroviride (Omero et al., 1999; Zeilinger et al., 2005). For determination of fungal biomass after growth in liquid culture, mycelial dry weight was measured.

DNA and RNA procedures.

Standard molecular techniques were performed according to Sambrook et al. (1989); DNA and RNA isolation was carried out as described by Peterbauer et al. (1996). For standard PCR amplification, recombinant Taq polymerase was used.

For cDNA preparation, RNAs were incubated with DNase I (1 U per µg RNA) to remove remaining chromosomal DNA. First-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out with an oligo(dT)18 primer (0.5 µg µl−1) and a random hexamer primer (0.2 µg µl−1), 1 µg total RNA and Revert Aid H Minus M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (200 U µl−1).

Real-time RT-PCR.

All quantifications were performed with the following PCR programme: initial denaturation for 180 s at 95 °C, 50 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 20 s on an Eppendorf realplex2S Mastercycler using the IQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) and 25 µl assays with standard MgCl2 concentration (3 mM) and with final primer concentrations of 100 nM each (Table 1). All assays were carried out in 96-well plates covered with optical tape. In both the parental strain and the gpr1 mutants, sar1 turned out by geNorm (Vandesompele et al., 2002) analysis to be the most stable internal control gene for cultivation on solid media, whereas act1 was the best reference gene for cultivations in liquid media (Brunner et al., 2008). PCR efficiency was determined from a single-tube reaction set-up as described by Tichopad et al. (2003), and the expression ratio was calculated according to the equation published by Pfaffl (2001). All samples were analysed in three independent experiments with three replicates in each run.


Microscopic studies were mainly performed as described by Lu et al. (2004). Briefly, 500 µl PDA was spread onto glass slides, inoculated, and incubated on a moistened filter paper at 28 °C in a Petri dish sealed with Parafilm. T. atroviride and R. solani were inoculated on opposite sides of the glass slides. After 48−72 h the fungal hyphae were examined with a Leitz Aristoplan microscope and pictures were taken using an Olympus DP 10 camera.

Confocal microscopic studies were performed using the membrane-sensitive red dye FM4-64 (Invitrogen), which stains the membranes of intact hyphae and the complete hyphal compartment of dead hyphal fragments due to the permeability of the cell wall of dead cells. For sample preparation, T. atroviride and R. solani were inoculated on opposite sides of a PDA plate and incubated for 48–72 h at 28 °C. For investigation of the fungal hyphae, the ‘inverted agar block method’ was used as described by Hickey et al. (2005). Briefly, a ~10 mm2, 5 mm thick block of agar from the region of the colony to be imaged was inverted onto a droplet of water containing the FM4-64 dye upon a glass coverslip. Excess medium was removed using a filter paper. Imaging was carried out with an inverted Nikon TE-2000 microscope equipped with a C1 confocal system. Images were taken with the EZ C1 software (Nikon) and digitally processed using the software Image J (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).

Antagonistic assays.

Plate confrontation assays were performed as described previously (Lorito et al., 1996; Zeilinger et al., 1999). Agar plugs of Trichoderma were cultivated together with a host fungus on PDA plates covered with a cellophane membrane at 28 °C. When the mycelia of the two fungi came into contact, mycelium of Trichoderma from the confrontation zone was harvested for RNA extraction.

Quantitative 6-pentyl-α-pyrone (6-PP) analysis.

Quantification of 6-PP from PDA plates was performed as described previously (Reithner et al., 2005).

Measurement of intracellular cAMP levels.

Mycelia from strains grown for 72 h on PDA were obtained as described previously (Zeilinger et al., 2005). The cAMP content was determined using the Direct cAMP Enzyme Immunoassay kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cAMP levels were related to protein concentrations (measured by the Bio-Rad protein assay) of the samples and were expressed as means±sd for three independent experiments.

cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) activity assay.

After growing T. atroviride for 72 h on PDA, mycelia were harvested, and 50 mg mycelium was ground in liquid nitrogen and homogenized three times for 10 s in 200 µl lysis buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, protease inhibitors). The homogenate was centrifuged at 30 000 g for 2 h at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and the protein concentration determined using Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad). PKA activity of 0.5 µg crude protein from three replicate samples obtained from independent cultivations was assayed using the Assay Designs Non-radioactive PKA Kinase Activity Assay kit (Assay Designs, Stressgen) with serially diluted active PKA serving as a positive control. The final colour development was stopped after 30 min and the colour intensity was measured by determining the absorbance at 450 nm.

Dual-membrane yeast two-hybrid assay.

A split ubiquitin-based yeast two-hybrid assay was performed to test Gpr1–Gα interactions. Vectors and yeast strains included in the DUALmembrane kit 3 (Dualsystems Biotech) were used. gpr1 full-length cDNA was amplified with primers tgpcr1sfiF and tgpcr1sfiR (Table 1) and introduced into vector pBT3-STE, thereby resulting in a fusion of the C-terminal half of ubiquitin Cub along with the transcription factor LexA-VP16 to the C-terminus of Gpr1. The mutated N-terminal half of ubiquitin NubG was fused to the N-terminus (vector pPR3 N) of tga1, tga2 and tga3 full-length cDNAs using primers tga1sfiF/tga1sfiR, tga2sfiF/tga2sfiR and tga3sfiF/tga3sfiR, respectively, and to the C-terminus (vector pPR3-STE) using primers tga1dualF/tga1dualRev, tga2dualF/tga2dualRev and tga3dualF/tga3dualRev (Table 1). The correct cDNA sequences were verified by sequencing the respective inserts. The Cub vector bearing the gpr1 cDNA was co-transformed with each of the NubG vectors encoding one of the three G protein α subunits into yeast strain NMY51. Substitution of proline by leucine at position 344 (L344P) of Gpr1 was done by introducing a point mutation at position 1031 in the open reading frame of the gpr1 gene. The mutation was introduced using phosphorylated primers SdMGpr1F and SdMGpr1R (Table 1) and the Phusion Site-directed mutagenesis kit (Finnzymes). The mutated gpr1 full-length cDNA was introduced into vector pBT3-STE. The mutation was verified by sequencing the respective insert. The Cub vector bearing the mutated gpr1 cDNA was co-transformed with each of the NubG vectors encoding one of the three Gα subunits into yeast strain NMY51.

Interactions were confirmed by growing transfected yeast on media lacking histidine or histidine and adenine and by measurement of β-galactosidase activity as a quantitative measure of the interaction. To prove that Gpr1 is actually expressed, a functional assay using the wild-type ubiquitin half NubI fused to the endogenous endoplasmic reticulum protein Alg5 as an interaction partner of Gpr1 was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH).

The T. atroviride parental strain and the gpr1-silenced transformant sil-8 were separately grown on PDA. Total RNA was extracted from the harvested mycelia and subtractive cDNA libraries were constructed using the PCR-Select cDNA subtraction kit (Clontech). cDNA from the transformant strain (driver) was subtracted from cDNA of the parental strain (tester). The cDNAs obtained were ligated into vector pGEM-T (Promega) and transformed into E. coli JM109. The presence of inserts was confirmed by PCR in 120 randomly collected clones. A total of 30 independent clones were selected for sequencing on the basis of their different insert sizes. The sequences obtained were used as a query to perform a tblastn search against the T. atroviride genome database (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Triat1/Triat1.home.html; Kubicek et al., 2011). The full-length sequences of the respective hypothetical proteins were retrieved from the genome database and used to perform a blastp search of the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).


The T. atroviride genome contains four genes encoding seven-transmembrane proteins of the cAMP-receptor-like family

Recently, we reported on the screening of the T. reesei genome for the presence of putative GPCRs. Based on these results, four T. atroviride genes (gpr1, gpr2, gpr3 and gpr4) encoding members of the cAMP-receptor-like (CRL) family were isolated by screening a genomic library (Brunner et al., 2008). As the genome sequence of T. atroviride was released recently, an additional in silico exploration of its database (Kubicek et al., 2011; http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Triat1/Triat1.home.html) for members of the CRL family could be performed. No additional family members were found by a blastp search using the protein sequences of Gpr1, Gpr2, Gpr3 and Gpr4 as query. In addition, the previously isolated gpr1, gpr2, gpr3 and gpr4 genes and their deduced amino acid sequences were completely consistent with their respective counterparts in the genome database, in which Gpr1 corresponds to protein ID160995, Gpr2 to ID50902, Gpr3 to ID83166 and Gpr4 to ID81233. Evaluation of the protein sequences with the tmhmm algorithm (Krogh et al., 2001) confirmed the presence of seven transmembrane regions and a topology typical for members of the CRL family, with five transmembrane domains at the N-terminal end, a long third intracellular loop and two helices next to the C-terminus.

Further characterization of the gpr1 gene revealed an open reading frame of 1446 bp harbouring two introns of 80 bp and 58 bp, respectively, which encodes a protein of 48.8 kDa. Gpr1 shows 52 % amino acid sequence identity to Gpr2, 28 % to Gpr3 and 30 % to Gpr4; 42 % sequence identity was found with Neurospora crassa GPR-2 and GPR-3, and 25 % with N. crassa GPR-1, the only CRL protein from an ascomycete functionally characterized up to now (Krystofova & Borkovich, 2006).

As G protein signalling is a co-action of a GPCR and a heterotrimeric G protein, we investigated whether Gpr1 directly interacts with any of the three Gα subunits of T. atroviride. When employing the split ubiquitin membrane-based yeast two-hybrid system (Stagljar et al., 1998), no physical interaction could be observed between Gpr1 and Tga1, Tga2 or Tga3 (data not shown). A constitutive activity of the receptor which results in its continuous dissociation from the interacting Gα protein may result in a failure to detect their direct interaction. Constitutive receptor activity was described to be caused by a substitution of a conserved proline by a leucine in the sixth transmembrane domain (TM-VI) (e.g. Baldwin, 1993; Hsueh et al., 2009). To test this possibility, we carefully determined the exact position of TM-VI of T. atroviride Gpr1 using the tmhmm algorithm. A comparison of the amino acid sequence of TM-VI of Gpr1 with the native constitutively active Cpr2 receptor of C. neoformans and mutant versions of S. cerevisiae Ste2 and Ste3 in which proline was artificially replaced by leucine (Konopka et al., 1996; Hsueh et al., 2009) showed that Gpr1 does not contain a proline in the conserved position but instead a leucine (Fig. 1). To assess if the missing interaction between Gpr1 and the Gα subunits in the split ubiquitin membrane-based yeast two-hybrid system was caused by a constitutive activity of Gpr1, a Gpr1L344P allele was generated. Again, no physical interaction with Tga1, Tga2 or Tga3 could be demonstrated (data not shown).

Fig. 1.
Amino acid sequences of transmembrane domain 6 (TM-VI) of S. cerevisiae Ste2 and Ste3, C. neoformans Cpr2 and T. atroviride Gpr1. Substitution of the conserved proline for leucine in Ste2 and Ste3 results in constitutive activation (*) of the respective ...

Phenotypic characterization of gpr1-silenced transformants

As several attempts to obtain gpr1 gene deletion mutants failed, a silencing approach was performed in order to functionally characterize the Gpr1 receptor. Four mitotically stable strains (gpr1 sil-2.1, gpr1 sil-6, gpr1 sil-7 and gpr1 sil-8) bearing ectopic integration of the silencing vector pSilent2-gpr1 (Brunner et al., 2008) were randomly chosen for further studies. They showed silencing levels of the gpr1 gene of 70–80 % (Table 2).

Table 2.
Characteristics of gpr1-silenced transformants

On solid medium, the transformants exhibited reduced growth rates and colony sizes and produced approximately threefold increased amounts of conidia compared to the parental strain (Table 2). The intracellular cAMP levels of the gpr1-silenced transformants were slightly reduced compared to the parental strain, and their PKA activities also differed only slightly (Table 2).

Identification of Gpr1 target genes

To identify genes being positively regulated by the signalling pathway(s) involving Gpr1, we applied suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) using transformant gpr1 sil-8. blast searches of the isolated sequences in the T. atroviride genome database resulted in the identification of 20 different genes. Among those, two genes (IDs 159687 and 128908) were represented by different ESTs nine and three times, respectively. The proteins encoded by the 20 genes identified were retrieved from the T. atroviride genome database. They showed similarity to proteins involved in diverse functions such as protein biosynthesis and folding, electron transport, carbohydrate metabolism, cell wall components, and proteins with unknown function (Table 3).

Table 3.
T. atroviride genes isolated by SSH

For 14 of the 20 genes, significantly lower mRNA levels in the gpr1-silenced transformant than in the parental strain upon cultivation on PDA could be verified by real-time RT-PCR (Fig. 2). These genes encoded proteins with IDs 159687 (protein of the cyclin-like superfamily), 129518 (candidate α-glycosyltransferase), 138324 (candidate β-glycosidase), 90851 (putative protease), 146614 (hypothetical protein with similarity to Aspergillus nidulans EsdC), 142792 (ribosomal protein), 145570 (hypothetical protein with similarity to uricase), 142538 (molecular chaperone Bip1), 127886 (electron transporter), 133072 (small secreted cysteine-rich protein, SSCP, belonging to cluster 1, Kubicek et al., 2011), 129811 (putative elongation factor), 146236 (putative translation elongation factor), 137004 (protein of unknown function) and 160894 (protein of unknown function). Two genes (IDs 133633 and 142851) showed similar mRNA levels in the gpr1-silenced transformant and the parental strain, and four genes (IDs 128908, 148150, 41949 and 132043) even exhibited enhanced transcription compared to the parental strain, suggesting that these are false positives.

Fig. 2.
Relative transcription ratios of the 20 genes retrieved by SSH in the gpr1 sil-8 transformant (black bars) in comparison to the parental strain (white bars) upon cultivation on PDA. mRNA levels were determined by real-time RT-PCR using sar1 as reference ...

When comparing the expression of the 14 genes verified as targets of Gpr1 upon cultivation in the absence of a host to cultivation in the presence of R. solani, only the SSCP (ID 133072) turned out to be induced (~2.5-fold) upon mycoparasitism in the parental strain. However, none of these genes was induced by the presence of the host in the gpr1-silenced transformant (data not shown).

gpr1-silenced transformants are affected in their antagonistic activity

To investigate the role of the Gpr1 receptor during the interaction with a living host fungus, plate confrontation assays against R. solani were performed. The parental strain began to overgrow and lyse the host fungus after ~4 days, whereas the gpr1-silenced transformants were completely avirulent, i.e. unable to attack and parasitize the host even after 14 days (Fig. 3). Similar results were obtained when S. sclerotiorum or B. cinerea were used as hosts (data not shown).

Fig. 3.
Plate confrontation assays of T. atroviride parental strain and the gpr1-silenced transformants with R. solani. Pictures were taken 4 and 14 days after inoculation of the two fungi on opposite sides of the plate.

During the early stages of the confrontation (e.g. at day 4, Fig. 3) a slight growth inhibition of the host fungus by the gpr1-silenced transformants was observed, suggesting the involvement of an antibiosis-like mechanism. However, quantification of 6-pentyl-α-pyrone (6-PP), one of the most important antifungal metabolites produced by T. atroviride (Claydon et al., 1987), in the parental strain [104.74±17.97 mg 6-PP (g mycelial dry weight)−1] and the gpr1-silenced transformant sil-8 [0.77±0.39 mg 6-PP (g mycelial dry weight)−1] revealed drastically reduced amounts secreted by the transformant.

Microscopic investigations of the confrontation zone with R. solani revealed that the parental strain recognized the host, as indicated by an attachment to and growth of the mycoparasite alongside the host's hyphae, which typically precedes coiling around the host. In contrast, the gpr1-silenced transformants did not attach to the host (Fig. 4a). As cAMP was repeatedly shown to promote mycoparasitic coiling of Trichoderma (e.g. Omero et al., 1999), exogenous cAMP was added to the plate confrontation assay. Interestingly, cAMP was able to restore attachment to and subsequent coiling around host hyphae in the gpr1-silenced transformants (Fig. 4b), although it was unable to restore mycoparasitic overgrowth and the hypersporulating phenotype.

Fig. 4.
Microscopic examination of the interaction of the T. atroviride parental strain and the gpr1-silenced transformants with R. solani in the absence (a) or presence (b) of 5 mM cAMP. The co-cultures were incubated until contact between the two fungi. Attachment ...

These results suggest that Gpr1 governs attachment of T. atroviride to host hyphae by transducing the signal via the cAMP pathway, which is similar to the previously described functions of the Tga3 Gα subunit (Zeilinger et al., 2005).

gpr1 gene silencing affects the expression of mycoparasitism-related genes

Besides attachment to and coiling around host hyphae, the formation of infection structures and production of hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinases and proteases play a major role during Trichoderma mycoparasitism (Geremia et al., 1993; Kubicek et al., 2001). To determine whether the avirulent phenotype of gpr1-silenced transformants correlates with altered expression levels of selected genes encoding cell-wall-degrading enzymes, we analysed the transcription of the chitinase-encoding nag1 and ech42 genes and the protease-encoding prb1 gene during confrontation with R. solani. As the four gpr1-silenced transformants tested showed the same behaviour in plate confrontation assays and in host attachment and coiling, gpr1 sil-7 and sil-8 were selected for analysis of enzyme production. In the parental strain, all three genes tested showed a basal level of transcription in the absence of a fungal host and were significantly induced upon contact with R. solani (Fig. 5). In the gpr1-silenced transformants confronted with R. solani no transcriptional induction of the three tested genes over the basal level could be observed. These results suggest that the Gpr1 receptor is essential for inducing the expression of mycoparasitism-related genes by the presence of a living host fungus.

Fig. 5.
Relative transcription ratios of the chitinase-encoding genes nag1 and ech42, and the protease-encoding gene prb1 in transformants gpr1 sil-7 (grey bars) and sil-8 (black bars) and the parental strain (white bars) during confrontation with R. solani. ...

In order to find out if the gpr1-silenced transformants are unable to sense the living host or if they have a general defect in the production of cell-wall-degrading enzymes, we analysed ech42 and nag1 gene transcription in liquid cultures (Fig. 6). Both genes were induced by N-acetylglucosamine and colloidal chitin in both the parental strain and the gpr1-silenced transformant tested; the latter even showed enhanced nag1 and ech42 mRNA levels. When analysing chitinase enzyme activities, a similar picture was obtained (data not shown).

Fig. 6.
Relative transcription ratios of the chitinase-encoding genes ech42 (a) and nag1 (b) in transformant gpr1 sil-8 (black bars) and the parental strain (white bars). Real-time RT-PCR was performed 5, 12 and 20 h after transfer of the mycelia to liquid growth ...

The ability of gpr1-silenced transformants to lyse and kill living host hyphae was also investigated by confocal microscopy using the red-fluorescing dye FM4-64. This dye stains the membranes of intact hyphae and the complete hyphal compartment of dead hyphal fragments. Whereas the hyphae of R. solani interacting with the T. atroviride parental strain appeared completely red, proving their lysis by cell-wall-degrading enzymes secreted by Trichoderma, host hyphae were completely undamaged upon confrontation with the gpr1-silenced transformant sil-7 (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.
Confocal microscopic studies of the interaction of the T. atroviride parental strain (WT, a) and the gpr1-silenced transformant sil-7 (b) with R. solani. Co-cultures were incubated until contact between the two fungi and pictures (left, confocal images; ...

Taken together, these results suggest that silencing of gpr1 results in an inability to respond to the presence of R. solani and to lyse and kill the living host fungus.


The Gα subunits Tga1 and Tga3 were previously shown to play crucial roles in signalling in the mycoparasite T. atroviride. They govern vegetative growth as well as mycoparasitism-relevant processes such as host attachment and coiling, and the production of chitinases and antifungal metabolites (Rocha-Ramirez et al., 2002; Reithner et al., 2005; Zeilinger et al., 2005). Because of this substantial role of G protein signalling, we were interested in the respective receptors acting upstream.

Despite the presence of numerous GPCR-encoding genes in fungal genomes, only a few of them have been functionally characterized. We recently reported on the isolation of four genes of T. atroviride which encode putative GPCRs of the CRL family (Brunner et al., 2008). This class of fungal receptors is defined via the structural similarity of its members to the cAR cAMP receptors of Dictyostelium discoideum, whereas it is absent in the genomes of the ascomycete yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Lafon et al., 2006; Li et al., 2007). The first CRL protein functionally characterized in an ascomycete fungus was N. crassa GPR-1, which is required for female sexual development (Krystofova & Borkovich, 2006) and which is the orthologue of T. atroviride Gpr3.

Despite their similarity on the sequence and topology level, CRL receptors seem to have diverse functions in different species. Whereas no obvious effects during asexual growth and development were reported for N. crassa Δgpr-1 mutants (Krystofova & Borkovich, 2006), T. atroviride gpr1-silenced transformants exhibited reduced growth and permanent conidiation on solid media. Furthermore, although members of the fungal CRL class exhibit amino acid sequence similarity to the cAMP-sensing receptors cAR1-cAR4 of D. discoideum, there is no evidence that extracellular cAMP is sensed via CRL proteins in fungi.

T. atroviride gpr1-silenced transformants, similar to Δtga3 mutants (Zeilinger et al., 2005) still responded to exogenous cAMP, as its addition resulted in the abrogation of their defect in attaching to and coiling around host hyphae; this makes it unlikely that cAMP is sensed by Gpr1. The finding that cAMP addition was not able to restore mycoparasitic overgrowth of the gpr1-silenced transformants suggests that this property is mediated through a cAMP-independent pathway.

In accordance with their defect in attaching to host hyphae, gpr1-silenced transformants were unable to attack and lyse host fungi upon direct confrontation (Figs 3 and and7).7). In addition, other processes known to contribute to Trichoderma mycoparasitism, such as the production of cell-wall-degrading enzymes, could not be induced by the living host, suggesting that Gpr1 might be involved in sensing of the host and in activating the signalling cascade(s) resulting in the mycoparasitic attack.

Concerning the production of cell-wall-degrading enzymes, it is interesting that transcription of nag1 and ech42 could not be induced in the gpr1-silenced transformants upon confrontation with a living host, although chitinase gene transcription, as in Δtga3 mutants (Zeilinger et al., 2005), was still inducible by N-acetylglucosamine or colloidal chitin in liquid culture. This defect may be due to the fact that gpr1-silenced transformants are unable to recognize host hyphae and attach to them, which is a prerequisite for induction of the transcription of certain chitinases such as nag1 (Zeilinger et al., 1999). nag1 expression, in turn, was shown to be indispensable for the induction of additional chitinase-encoding genes of T. atroviride such as ech42 (Brunner et al., 2003). In addition, it is worth mentioning that silencing of gpr1 resulted in a reduced level of constitutively expressed chitinase genes (Fig. 5), which are believed to be responsible for the initial attack of the host cell wall followed by the release of host-derived cell wall degradation products which then act as inducers for the full induction of the chitinolytic enzyme machinery (Kullnig et al., 2000). The isolation of a β-glycosidase showing high similarity to Trichoderma virens Nag3 by SSH (Table 3) and the finding that its expression is significantly reduced in the gpr1-silenced transformants compared to the parental strain could point to a defect of the transformants in generating the inducer from the living host due to reduced constitutive expression of chitinases.

The gene most frequently isolated by the SSH approach encodes a protein belonging to the cyclin-like superfamily (ID159687) with similarity to the Pho85 cyclin-7 (Pcl7). Investigation of its transcription revealed a 60 % decrease in transformant gpr1 sil-8 compared to the parental strain (Fig. 2). There is evidence that Pcl7, upon association with the cyclin-dependent kinase Pho85, could be involved in nutrient utilization in fungi, as a Δpcl7 mutant of S. cerevisiae is unable to use galactose, maltose or lactose as carbon sources, or proline as a nitrogen source (Lee et al., 2000). Interestingly, previous analysis of the carbon utilization properties of the T. atroviride gpr1 sil-8 transformant using Biolog phenotype arrays revealed drastically reduced growth of the mutant on galactose and maltose, and almost no growth on lactose and proline, whereas these were among the best carbon sources for the parental strain (Brunner et al., 2008). These data suggest that Gpr1 could be involved in the utilization of nutrients, possibly by regulating the expression of the Plc7-like cyclin. In addition, it is worth mentioning that in the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis the Pho85/Cdk5 cyclin-dependent kinase was found to control cell-cycle regulation and polar growth of hyphae, both of which are directly related to the pathogenic development (Pérez-Martín & Castillo-Lluva, 2008). Similar processes resulting from the downregulation of cyclin expression could also be one of the reasons for the observed inability of gpr1-silenced transformants to undergo the typical mycoparasitism-related morphological changes.

As one of the additional targets of Gpr1, a gene encoding a small secreted cysteine-rich protein (SSCP; ID133072) was identified by the SSH approach. This gene showed an upregulation during mycoparasitism in the parental strain, whereas its expression could not be induced by the host in the gpr1-silenced transformants. Recent clustering of SSCPs identified in the Trichoderma genomes revealed T. atroviride ID133072 to belong to cluster 1, for whose members no function is known yet (Kubicek et al., 2011). Further investigations are warranted to study the role of this SSCP during the antagonistic Trichoderma–host interaction and find out in which of the processes contributing to mycoparasitism this protein is involved.

When analysing possible interactions between Gpr1 and the three G protein α subunits of T. atroviride, we could not observe any physical interaction between the receptor and Tga1, Tga2 or Tga3. As gpr1-silenced transformants and Δtga3 mutants (Zeilinger et al., 2005) share several phenotypes such as reduced growth with only few aerial hyphae, continuous sporulation on solid media, defects in attaching to host hyphae, and similar alterations in the expression of cell-wall-degrading enzymes, this result was quite unexpected. Nevertheless, G protein-independent signalling has been assumed for several seven-transmembrane receptors (e.g. Brzostowski & Kimmel, 2001) including those of fungi (e.g. Wang et al., 2010).

Our study revealed a role of the Gpr1 seven-transmembrane receptor in transduction of host-derived signals to intracellular regulatory targets resulting in activation of processes contributing to the mycoparasitic host attack of T. atroviride. The fact that the defect of gpr1-silenced transformants in attaching to host hyphae could be restored by cAMP prompted us to postulate that Gpr1 regulates infection structure formation by signalling via the cAMP pathway. However, as no direct interaction between Gpr1 and the three Gα proteins could be proven by the approach we used, the possibility that Gpr1 (also) signals in a G-protein-independent manner cannot be ruled out at the moment. Screening for Gpr1- and Tga3-interacting proteins will help to further elucidate the G protein signalling pathways underlying Trichoderma mycoparasitism.


This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund FWF (grants P18109-B12 and V139-B20). The authors thank Joseph Heitman and members of his group from the Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology at the Duke University Medical Center in Durham, NC, USA, for their support in performing the split-ubiquitin membrane-based yeast two-hybrid system. M. R. O.’s stay at Durham was supported by funds from ASAG (Akademisch Soziale Arbeitsgemeinschaft) and Österreichische Forschungsgemeinschaft. We acknowledge Rainer Schuhmacher and Norbert Stoppacher from the Center of Analytical Chemistry, IFA-Tulln, for assistance with the measurement of 6-PP levels.



cAMP receptor like
expressed sequence tag
G-protein-coupled receptor
cAMP-dependent protein kinase
small secreted cysteine-rich protein
suppression subtractive hybridization


  • Baker K. F. (1987). Evolving concepts of biological control of plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 25, 67–85 10.1146/annurev.py.25.090187.000435 [Cross Ref]
  • Baldwin J. M. (1993). The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein-coupled receptors. EMBO J 12, 1693–1703 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Blumer K. J., Reneke J. E., Thorner J. (1988). The STE2 gene product is the ligand-binding component of the alpha-factor receptor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 263, 10836–10842 [PubMed]
  • Brunner K., Peterbauer C. K., Mach R. L., Lorito M., Zeilinger S., Kubicek C. P. (2003). The Nag1 N-acetylglucosaminidase of Trichoderma atroviride is essential for chitinase induction by chitin and of major relevance to biocontrol. Curr Genet 43, 289–295 10.1007/s00294-003-0399-y [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brunner K., Omann M., Pucher M. E., Delic M., Lehner S. M., Domnanich P., Kratochwill K., Druzhinina I., Denk D., Zeilinger S. (2008). Trichoderma G protein-coupled receptors: functional characterisation of a cAMP receptor-like protein from Trichoderma atroviride. Curr Genet 54, 283–299 10.1007/s00294-008-0217-7 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brzostowski J. A., Kimmel A. R. (2001). Signaling at zero G: G-protein-independent functions for 7-TM receptors. Trends Biochem Sci 26, 291–297 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01804-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chang Y. C., Miller G. F., Kwon-Chung K. J. (2003). Importance of a developmentally regulated pheromone receptor of Cryptococcus neoformans for virulence. Infect Immun 71, 4953–4960 10.1128/IAI.71.9.4953-4960.2003 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chet I., Benhamou N., Haran S. (1998). Mycoparasitism and lytic enzymes. In Trichoderma and Gliocladium, vol. 2, pp. 153–171 Edited by Harman G. E., Kubicek C. P., editors. London: Taylor & Francis
  • Claydon N., Allan M., Hanson J. R., Avent A. G. (1987). Antifungal alkyl pyrones of Trichoderma harzianum. Trans Br Mycol Soc 88, 503–513 10.1016/S0007-1536(87)80034-7 [Cross Ref]
  • DeZwaan T. M., Carroll A. M., Valent B., Sweigard J. A. (1999). Magnaporthe grisea pth11p is a novel plasma membrane protein that mediates appressorium differentiation in response to inductive substrate cues. Plant Cell 11, 2013–2030 10.1105/tpc.11.10.2013 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dohlman H. G., Thorner J., Caron M. G., Lefkowitz R. J. (1991). Model systems for the study of seven-transmembrane-segment receptors. Annu Rev Biochem 60, 653–688 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.003253 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Elad Y., Chet I., Boyle P., Henis Y. (1983). Parasitism by Trichoderma spp. on Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii – scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy. Phytopathology 73, 85–88 10.1094/Phyto-73-85 [Cross Ref]
  • Gehrke A., Heinekamp T., Jacobsen I. D., Brakhage A. A. (2010). Heptahelical receptors GprC and GprD of Aspergillus fumigatus are essential regulators of colony growth, hyphal morphogenesis, and virulence. Appl Environ Microbiol 76, 3989–3998 10.1128/AEM.00052-10 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Geremia R. A., Goldman G. H., Jacobs D., Ardrtes W., Vila S. B., Van Montagu M., Herrera-Estrella A. (1993). Molecular characterization of the proteinase-encoding gene, prb1, related to mycoparasitism by Trichoderma harzianum. Mol Microbiol 8, 603–613 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01604.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gutkind J. S. (1998). Cell growth control by G protein-coupled receptors: from signal transduction to signal integration. Oncogene 17, 1331–1342 10.1038/sj.onc.1202186 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hagen D. C., McCaffrey G., Sprague G. F., Jr (1986). Evidence the yeast STE3 gene encodes a receptor for the peptide pheromone a factor: gene sequence and implications for the structure of the presumed receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83, 1418–1422 10.1073/pnas.83.5.1418 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Harman G. E., Howell C. R., Viterbo A., Chet I., Lorito M. (2004). Trichoderma species – opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol 2, 43–56 10.1038/nrmicro797 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hickey P. C., Swift S. R., Roca M. G., Read N. D. (2005). Live-cell imaging of filamentous fungi using vital fluorescent dyes and confocal microscopy. In Methods in Microbiology, Microbial Imaging, vol. 35, pp. 63–87 Edited by Savidge T., Pothoulakis C., editors. London: Elsevier
  • Hjeljord L., Tronsmo A. (1998). Trichoderma and Gliocladium in biological control: an overview. In Trichoderma and Gliocladium, vol. 2, pp. 131–152 Edited by Harman G. E., Kubicek C. P., editors. London, UK: Taylor & Francis
  • Hsueh Y. P., Xue C., Heitman J. (2009). A constitutively active GPCR governs morphogenic transitions in Cryptococcus neoformans. EMBO J 28, 1220–1233 10.1038/emboj.2009.68 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Inbar J., Chet I. (1994). A newly isolated lectin from the plant pathogenic fungus Sclerotium rolfsii: purification, characterization and role in mycoparasitism. Microbiology 140, 651–657 10.1099/00221287-140-3-651 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kim H., Borkovich K. A. (2004). A pheromone receptor gene, pre-1, is essential for mating type-specific directional growth and fusion of trichogynes and female fertility in Neurospora crassa. Mol Microbiol 52, 1781–1798 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04096.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Konopka J. B., Margarit S. M., Dube P. (1996). Mutation of Pro-258 in transmembrane domain 6 constitutively activates the G protein-coupled alpha-factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 6764–6769 10.1073/pnas.93.13.6764 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Krogh A., Larsson B., von Heijne G., Sonnhammer E. L. (2001). Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305, 567–580 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Krystofova S., Borkovich K. A. (2006). The predicted G-protein-coupled receptor GPR-1 is required for female sexual development in the multicellular fungus Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell 5, 1503–1516 10.1128/EC.00124-06 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kubicek C. P., Mach R. L., Peterbauer C. K., Lorito M. (2001). Trichoderma: from genes to biocontrol. J Plant Pathol 83, 11–23
  • Kubicek C. P., Herrera-Estrella A., Seidl-Seiboth V., Martinez D. A., Druzhinina I. S., Thon M., Zeilinger S., Casas-Flores S., Horwitz B. A. & other authors (2011). Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma. Genome Biol 12, R40 10.1186/gb-2011-12-4-r40 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kullnig C., Mach R. L., Lorito M., Kubicek C. P. (2000). Enzyme diffusion from Trichoderma atroviride ( = T. harzianum P1) to Rhizoctonia solani is a prerequisite for triggering of Trichoderma ech42 gene expression before mycoparasitic contact. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 2232–2234 10.1128/AEM.66.5.2232-2234.2000 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lafon A., Han K. H., Seo J. A., Yu J. H., d’Enfert C. (2006). G-protein and cAMP-mediated signaling in aspergilli: a genomic perspective. Fungal Genet Biol 43, 490–502 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.02.001 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lander E. S., Linton L. M., Birren B., Nusbaum C., Zody M. C., Baldwin J., Devon K., Dewar K., Doyle M. & other authors (2001). Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 10.1038/35057062 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lee M., O’Regan S., Moreau J. L., Johnson A. L., Johnston L. H., Goding C. R. (2000). Regulation of the Pcl7-Pho85 cyclin-cdk complex by Pho81. Mol Microbiol 38, 411–422 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02140.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Li L., Wright S. J., Krystofova S., Park G., Borkovich K. A. (2007). Heterotrimeric G protein signaling in filamentous fungi. Annu Rev Microbiol 61, 423–452 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093432 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lorito M., Woo S. L., D'Ambrosio M., Harman G. E., Hayes C. K., Kubicek C. P., Scala F. (1996). Synergistic action between cell wall degrading enzymes and membrane affecting compounds. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 9, 206–213 10.1094/MPMI-9-0206 [Cross Ref]
  • Lu Z., Tombolini R., Woo S., Zeilinger S., Lorito M., Jansson J. K. (2004). In vivo study of Trichoderma–pathogen–plant interactions, using constitutive and inducible green fluorescent protein reporter systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 3073–3081 10.1128/AEM.70.5.3073-3081.2004 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mukherjee P. K., Latha J., Hadar R., Horwitz B. A. (2004). Role of two G-protein alpha subunits, TgaA and TgaB, in the antagonism of plant pathogens by Trichoderma virens. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 542–549 10.1128/AEM.70.1.542-549.2004 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mukherjee M., Mukherjee P. K., Kale S. P. (2007). cAMP signalling is involved in growth, germination, mycoparasitism and secondary metabolism in Trichoderma virens. Microbiology 153, 1734–1742 10.1099/mic.0.2007/005702-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Neer E. J. (1995). Heterotrimeric G proteins: organizers of transmembrane signals. Cell 80, 249–257 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90407-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Omero C., Inbar J., Rocha-Ramirez V., Herrera-Estrella A., Chet I., Horwitz B. A. (1999). G protein activators and cAMP promote mycoparasitic behaviour in Trichoderma harzianum. Mycol Res 103, 1637–1642 10.1017/S0953756299008886 [Cross Ref]
  • Pérez-Martín J., Castillo-Lluva S. (2008). Connections between polar growth and cell cycle arrest during the induction of the virulence program in the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis. Plant Signal Behav 3, 480–481 10.4161/psb.3.7.5680 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Peterbauer C. K., Lorito M., Hayes C. K., Harman G. E., Kubicek C. P. (1996). Molecular cloning and expression of the nag1 gene (N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase-encoding gene) from Trichoderma harzianum P1. Curr Genet 30, 325–331 10.1007/s002940050140 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pfaffl M. W. (2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29, e45 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Reithner B., Brunner K., Schuhmacher R., Peissl I., Seidl V., Krska R., Zeilinger S. (2005). The G protein alpha subunit Tga1 of Trichoderma atroviride is involved in chitinase formation and differential production of antifungal metabolites. Fungal Genet Biol 42, 749–760 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.04.009 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rocha-Ramirez V., Omero C., Chet I., Horwitz B. A., Herrera-Estrella A. (2002). Trichoderma atroviride G-protein α-subunit gene tga1 is involved in mycoparasitic coiling and conidiation. Eukaryot Cell 1, 594–605 10.1128/EC.1.4.594-605.2002 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F., Maniatis T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
  • Stagljar I., Korostensky C., Johnsson N., te Heesen S. (1998). A genetic system based on split-ubiquitin for the analysis of interactions between membrane proteins in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 5187–5192 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5187 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tanaka K., Davey J., Imai Y., Yamamoto M. (1993). Schizosaccharomyces pombe map3+ encodes the putative M-factor receptor. Mol Cell Biol 13, 80–88 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tichopad A., Dilger M., Schwarz G., Pfaffl M. W. (2003). Standardized determination of real-time PCR efficiency from a single reaction set-up. Nucleic Acids Res 31, e122 10.1093/nar/gng122 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Vandesompele J., De Preter K., Pattyn F., Poppe B., Van Roy N., De Paepe A., Speleman F. (2002). Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3, RESEARCH003434.1–RESEARCH0034.11 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang Y., Li A., Wang X., Zhang X., Zhao W., Dou D., Zheng X., Wang Y. (2010). GPR11, a putative seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor, controls zoospore development and virulence of Phytophthora sojae. Eukaryot Cell 9, 242–250 10.1128/EC.00265-09 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Xue C., Bahn Y. S., Cox G. M., Heitman J. (2006). G protein-coupled receptor Gpr4 senses amino acids and activates the cAMP-PKA pathway in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Biol Cell 17, 667–679 10.1091/mbc.E05-07-0699 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zeilinger S., Galhaup C., Payer K., Woo S. L., Mach R. L., Fekete C., Lorito M., Kubicek C. P. (1999). Chitinase gene expression during mycoparasitic interaction of Trichoderma harzianum with its host. Fungal Genet Biol 26, 131–140 10.1006/fgbi.1998.1111 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zeilinger S., Reithner B., Scala V., Peissl I., Lorito M., Mach R. L. (2005). Signal transduction by Tga3, a novel G protein alpha subunit of Trichoderma atroviride. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 1591–1597 10.1128/AEM.71.3.1591-1597.2005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology
PubReader format: click here to try


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Protein
    Protein translation features of primary database (GenBank) nucleotide records reported in the current articles as well as Reference Sequences (RefSeqs) that include the articles as references.
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...