![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2001, The National Academy of Sciences Ecology Ecosystem impacts of three sequential hurricanes (Dennis, Floyd,
and Irene) on the United States' largest lagoonal estuary, Pamlico
Sound, NC *University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Marine Sciences, Morehead City, NC 28557; ‡U.S. Geological Survey, Raleigh, NC 27607; §Division of Water Quality, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC 27699-1621; ¶Duke University Marine Laboratory, Beaufort, NC 28516; and ‖Department of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3146 †To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail:
hans_paerl/at/unc.edu. Communicated by Ellis B. Cowling, North Carolina State
University, Raleigh, NC Received July 5, 2000; Accepted February 26, 2001. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Three sequential hurricanes, Dennis, Floyd, and Irene,
affected coastal North Carolina in September and October 1999. These
hurricanes inundated the region with up to 1 m of rainfall,
causing 50- to 500-year flooding in the watershed of the Pamlico Sound,
the largest lagoonal estuary in the United States and a key West
Atlantic fisheries nursery. We investigated the ecosystem-level impacts
on and responses of the Sound to the floodwater discharge. Floodwaters
displaced three-fourths of the volume of the Sound, depressed salinity
by a similar amount, and delivered at least half of the typical annual
nitrogen load to this nitrogen-sensitive ecosystem. Organic carbon
concentrations in floodwaters entering Pamlico Sound via a major
tributary (the Neuse River Estuary) were at least 2-fold higher than
concentrations under prefloodwater conditions. A cascading set of
physical, chemical, and ecological impacts followed, including strong
vertical stratification, bottom water hypoxia, a sustained increase in
algal biomass, displacement of many marine organisms, and a rise in
fish disease. Because of the Sound's long residence time (≈1 year),
we hypothesize that the effects of the short-term nutrient enrichment
could prove to be multiannual. A predicted increase in the frequency of
hurricane activity over the next few decades may cause longer-term
biogeochemical and trophic changes in this and other estuarine and
coastal habitats. Six major hurricanes,
magnitude 2 or greater on the Safford–Simpson scale, have made
landfall in North Carolina between 1996 and 1999. Hurricanes Dennis
(September 4–5) and Floyd (September 16), which passed through North
Carolina during a 12-day period in September 1999, and Hurricane Irene,
which passed near the North Carolina coast on October 17, 1999, led to
unprecedented rainfall and prolonged record flooding in eastern North
Carolina. The floodwaters inundated coastal rivers and impacted the
hydrologic and chemical characteristics of Pamlico Sound (PS), the
United States' second largest estuarine ecosystem (Fig.
(Fig.1).1
PS is a shallow lagoonal ecosystem (mean depth = 4.5 m,
maximum depth = 7.3 m) with a vast surface area of 5,300 km
(2) and limited water exchange with the Atlantic Ocean through four
narrow inlets (2). The ratio of the volume of the sound (26 billion
m3) to the average annual inflow (910
m3 s−1) yields a
theoretical freshwater replacement time of about 11 months (3), far
exceeding the replacement time of most temperate estuaries (4). Actual
residence time is likely to be longer for much of the inflow because of
restricted circulation in sheltered areas and the position of the tidal
inlets relative to major tributaries (5). During typical hydrologic conditions, elevated late winter–early
spring water and nutrient inputs promote high spring–summer primary
productivity, especially in the Chowan River, Pamlico River, and Neuse
River (Fig. (Fig.1),1 Despite its ecological and economic importance, very little
monitoring and research have been conducted in PS. This is likely
related to the long-held assumption that the vast size of this system
acts as a buffer against climatic, hydrologic, and biochemical
perturbations. Fortunately, some environmental data were collected on
several occasions during 1998 as part of university instructional
activities and a water quality monitoring feasibility study (12). These
data provided a critical baseline against which we tested the
hypothesis that PS is susceptible to significant hydrologic,
biogeochemical, and ecological alterations resulting from floods
associated with hurricanes. In response to the unprecedented flooding
in the fall of 1999, we initiated a collaborative study to examine and
evaluate ecosystem-level responses to the floodwater inputs to PS.
Here, we report on the magnitude of the flooding, and the short-term
water quality and habitat effects and longer-term ramifications for the
Sound. Methods The environmental data used in this study were collected
before and after the three 1999 hurricanes through ongoing cooperative
watershed and estuarine-based monitoring programs in the tributaries of
PS. The Neuse and Pamlico River estuaries, the two largest tributaries
of PS, are sampled at weekly to biweekly intervals (see
http://www.marine.unc.edu/neuse/modmon) and monitored
continuously via instrumentation (see http://nc.water.usgs.gov). Three continuous monitoring platforms are located in both the Pamlico
River estuary and in the Neuse River estuary; an additional platform is
located near the mouth of the Roanoke River. Near-surface and
near-bottom pH, water temperature, salinity, and dissolved-oxygen
concentration are measured at 15-min intervals by using in
situ sensors. Instruments are serviced and calibrated at 1- to
2-week intervals. Some of these platforms were removed in advance of
Hurricane Dennis, but they were reinstalled in early October 1999. PS proper has not been routinely monitored. However, during 1998
and in 1999, before the hurricanes, Duke University researchers
conducted nine instructional cruises in western PS. They collected data
along a series of four transects including a site termed “C-3”
(35° 7.22′ N, 76° 28.66′ W), which is near the mouth of the Neuse
River estuary and which has been sampled since September 1998 (Fig. (Fig.1).
1 Sampling approaches and analytical methods were as follows. Freshwater Inflows. Freshwater inflows to the estuaries and to PS were determined from data
collected at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) network of stream gauges
in North Carolina and Virginia, and from estimates of flow in ungauged
areas. Streamflow from 67.7% of the land area draining to PS is
gauged. Rainfall on the surface of Albemarle Sound and PS was estimated
from rain gauge and Doppler radar measurements. Average inflow to PS
was computed from long-term monthly mean streamflow records. The period
of streamflow record at the various stream gauges used in the analysis
ranged from about 15 years to more than 100 years (13). Flood Recurrence Intervals. Flood recurrence intervals for Hurricane Floyd flooding at stream
gauges in the PS watershed were computed by using established
procedures (14). Recorded peak flows from this event and associated
flood recurrence intervals are available on the USGS web site
(http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/wri/wri004093/)and in ref. 14. Hydrological, Oxygen, Salinity, and Nutrient Dynamics. The 15 sampling stations in western PS (Fig. (Fig.1)1 Dissolved nutrient samples were prepared by filtering freshly
collected PS water through precombusted Whatman GF/F filters. If not
analyzed immediately, samples were frozen at −20°C until analysis.
Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) concentrations were determined by
colorimetric methods by using a Lachat Instruments (Milwaukee)
Quickchem QC 8000 autoanalyzer. The following methods were used:
ammonium, nos. 31-107-06-1-A and 31-107-06-1-C; nitrate/nitrite, no.
31-107-04-1-C (Lachat Instruments). DIN concentrations were measured at
weekly or biweekly intervals; linear interpolation was used to
calculate concentrations for days not sampled. Daily DIN loading to the
Neuse River estuary was calculated as the product of DIN concentrations
and daily mean discharge. Daily loading values were summed to obtain
monthly or yearly loading. The 1999 loading estimates used
concentration data from a station near the head of the Neuse River
estuary at New Bern and the sum of daily discharge data from three
streamflow gauging stations that together measure streamflow from 97%
of the Neuse River basin upstream from New Bern. Floodwater loading was
calculated for the period 1 September to 25 October 1999. The
1994–1997 loading was derived from concentration data collected 15 km
upstream from New Bern, and from discharge data measured at Kinston,
and prorated to the nutrient sampling site (11). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and particulate organic carbon
measurements were made by using high-temperature combustion techniques
(15) using a Shimadzu 5000A total organic carbon analyzer (DOC) and a
Perkin-Elmer 2400 Series II CHN analyzer (particulate organic carbon). Chlorophyll a Measurements. Fifty-milliliter water samples were gently filtered through 25-mm
Whatman GF/F filters while a few drops of aqueous
MgCO3 (1%) were added (six samples per station,
three surface and three bottom). The filters were extracted 90%
acetone overnight at −10°C. Fluorescence was measured on a Turner
Designs (Sunnyvale, CA) 10AU fluorometer
(Fo), and then two drops of 10% HCl
were added to the acetone extract and fluorescence was measured again
(Fa). The fluorometer was calibrated
with a chlorophyll a standard, the concentration of which
was determined with a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 3B spectrophotometer and the
trichromatic equation of Jeffrey and Humphrey (16). Fish Surveys. Fish surveys accompanied the hydrological, chemical, and chlorophyll
time series measurements. We sampled fish at station C-3 with short
trawls (5 min, 2–3 knots) using a 9-m headrope mongoose trawl (4.8-cm
inch bar mesh wings and body with a 1.2-cm tail bag mesh). After each
trawl, all fish were identified to species and counted, measured (total
length, in mm), and examined for external signs of disease (i.e.,
lesions or bloating caused by bacterial infection). Fish catch was
standardized by calculating a catch per unit effort as the number of
fish per 100 m trawled. Distance towed was estimated from the
speed of the boat and trawl time and checked with positions taken at
the start and end of each trawl with a Garmin (Olathe, KS) GPS. Results and Discussion Hydrology. Hurricanes Dennis, Floyd, and Irene occurred within a 6-week period
between September 4 and October 17, 1999, and brought heavy rains to
the PS watershed, which includes the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Roanoke, and
Chowan River basins, as well as coastal drainage located primarily to
the north and south of Albemarle Sound (see Fig. 6, which is published
as supplementary material on the PNAS web site, www.pnas.org). The
central part of the Tar-Pamlico River basin received 96 cm of rain
during September and October, or about 85% of the average annual
rainfall. The central and lower Neuse River basin received about 75 cm
of rain during September and October, and more than half of the average
annual rainfall fell during September alone (see Fig. 7, which is
published as supplementary material on the PNAS web site). Most of the
rainfall reporting stations in eastern North Carolina received at least
half of the average annual rainfall during September and October (13). All of the river basins draining to PS experienced flooding in at
least one location at the 500-year recurrence interval (Fig. 6). Record
high water levels were measured at 11 of the 12 USGS stream gauging
stations in the Tar-Pamlico River basin, including Tarboro, where the
recorded level was about 3 m higher than previously recorded in
more than 100 years of records and the peak flood flow was about double
the previous maximum flow (13). The most prolonged flooding occurred in
the Neuse River basin. Water levels were above the National Weather
Service flood stage at Kinston continuously from September 10 through
October. Freshwater inflow to PS during September and October 1999 was
equivalent to about 83% of the total volume of the Sound. Typically,
mean inflow volume for these two months is ≈13% of the Sound volume
(Table 1). The Neuse and Tar-Pamlico
River basins, which together comprise about 31% of the drainage area
to PS, contributed about 44% of the inflow to the Sound in September,
and more than half of the inflow in October. Inflow volume to the head
of the Pamlico River estuary during September was more than 90% of the
mean annual flow volume (13). Inflow to the Neuse River estuary was
slightly less than to the Pamlico River, with September inflow volume
equivalent to 55–60% of average annual inflow (13). In response to
the exceedingly high discharge associated with floodwaters, estimated
water residence times were only about 7 days for the Pamlico and Neuse
River estuaries during September, compared with a more typical mean
value of about 70 days (17, 18).
During normal hydrologic years, more than 60% of the annual
rainfall and river basin discharge occurs during the November–March
rainy season. The high spring water and nutrient loading accompanying
this discharge supports large winter–spring phytoplankton blooms (11).
This pattern was drastically altered during the fall of 1999, when
approximately half of the annual water discharge occurred during a
6-week period in early fall instead. Salinity. Weekly monitoring along the axis of both the Neuse and Pamlico
estuaries following Floyd and Dennis floodwater discharge (late
September 1999) revealed freshwater conditions [salinity < 0.2
practical salinity units (psu)] stretching from the headwaters to the
mouths of these major tributaries. A comparison of pre- and
posthurricane salinity regimes throughout these estuaries can be found
on the Neuse River Modeling and Monitoring (ModMon;
http://www.marine.unc.edu/neuse/modmon) and USGS
(http://nc.water.usgs.gov) web sites. Historic late summer salinities are typically at their maximum of
10–13 psu near the mouths of the two systems (17, 18), whereas surface
salinities in southwestern PS also reach maximum values from 15 to 20
psu in September (19) (Fig. (Fig.2).2
The mass and momentum of the inflow created vertical
stratification and a well defined pycnocline at a depth of ≈5 m by
early October (Fig. (Fig.3).3
Reduced salinity and vertical stratification, combined with a high
organic matter content and resulting hypoxia existed in PS for ≈3
weeks, beginning after floodwaters reached the Sound in late September.
The stratification and hypoxia persisted until Hurricane Irene (16
October) destratified, re-aerated, and further freshened the Sound to
≈6 psu. The Sound subsequently restratified (Fig. (Fig.3),3 A comparison of 1998–1999 salinity data before landfall of the
hurricanes with posthurricane data at station C-3 shows the initial and
sustained depression of salinity imposed by “freshening” of this
long residence time system (Fig. (Fig.22 Biogeochemical and Ecological Considerations. The DIN load at the head of the Neuse River estuary in September
and October 1999 amounted to over 800 Mt of nitrogen, which was 71% of
the 1994–1997 average annual DIN loading. This high load translated
into elevated concentrations of ammonium and nitrate throughout the
estuaries and PS. DIN concentrations are usually less than 1 μM at
the Neuse River estuary mouth in late summer (6, 8, 10, 11), but
ammonium and nitrate concentrations at this location were greater than
10 μM and 2 μM, respectively, in early October. DIN concentrations
in the open Sound were elevated (0.71–11.06 μM nitrogen) and
atypically similar to Neuse River estuary concentrations (6.64–15.56
μM nitrogen). In contrast, DIN in the Chesapeake Bay, after flooding
associated with Hurricane Agnes, increased only at the head of the Bay,
not throughout the Bay (20). The hurricane floodwater was greatly enriched in organic matter.
The DOC concentration in the Neuse River estuary near its entrance to
PS rose from prehurricane values of 500–700 μM C to more than 1,200
μM C after the storms (Fig. (Fig.4),4
Phytoplankton biomass, as chlorophyll a, increased 3- to
5-fold relative to prehurricane conditions (Fig.
(Fig.5).5
Rapid declines in salinity and oxygen have been shown to have direct
short-term physiological effects on estuarine macrofauna and greatly
reduce the habitable area for resident fish and shellfish species in
this system (24, 25). Dissolved oxygen concentrations less than 2 mg
O2 liter−1 are stressful
to most motile finfish and shellfish species and fatal to sessile biota
(26–28). On 8 October, after Floyd and before Irene, dead and dying
shrimp and blue crabs were collected from below the pycnocline where
dissolved oxygen was consistently less than 4 mg
O2 liter−1 (hypoxia) and
in places reached less than 2 mg O2
liter−1 (anoxia). In contrast, blue crabs
apparently were unaffected by floods following Hurricane Agnes in
Chesapeake Bay (20). Catches of many species (e.g., croaker, spot, bay anchovy, and shrimp)
declined by 50% or more in the Neuse River estuary compared with
samples taken before the flooding. Catches were also reduced
substantially relative to fall catches in 1998. In PS, the number of
live finfish and crabs caught during each of three trawls in the
western Sound was about 3-fold higher than the number caught before the
flooding, although species richness was lower (Table 2). Peak catches
in October 1999 were more than 5 times higher than peak catches at the
same time in 1998. Thus, it appeared that many of the motile species
moved out of the estuaries with the influx of freshwater, but sessile
benthic invertebrates were stressed or killed by exposure to
low-salinity, hypoxic water. Diseased fish were first noted in the
Neuse River and propagated downstream; by 27 October, disease increased
substantially in the PS, when about 10–20% of three common species
(pinfish, 17%; spot, 20%; and croaker, 14%) had lesions, sores, or
sloughing skin; 50–70% showed signs of systemic bacterial infections
(E. Noga, North Carolina State University, personal communication).
During the same period in a nonhurricane year (October 1998), the
incidences of external sores in the Neuse River estuary were 0.18% in
spot (n = 566) and 0.14% in croaker (n
= 718); there is no data for pinfish. The shallow depths and long residence time of PS suggest that a
large proportion of the allochthonous and autochthonous organic input
during 1999 was deposited in the sediments. Preliminary examinations of
the Sound's surface sediments indicate organic matter enrichment from
both nutrient-enhanced primary production and sediments transported to
the Sound from the riverine tributaries by flood flows. Increased rates
of oxygen consumption and inorganic nutrient release from sediment
diagenesis have been observed in the Neuse and Pamlico estuaries in
response to organic matter enrichment (8, 10, 29). The inorganic
nutrient release should further stimulate primary production, as
occurred in Chesapeake Bay after Hurricane Agnes (20). Spring and
summer of 2000 proved to be very windy, preventing strong vertical
stratification and persistent bottom-water hypoxia in the open Sound;
however, high rates of primary production were maintained, and hypoxic
bottom-water conditions were observed in portions of western PS from
June to October 2000. During the same period, increased aerial extent
and frequencies of hypoxia and elevated (relative to 1994–1999) rates
of primary production were observed in the more sheltered (from wind
mixing) lower Neuse River estuary (6, 11, 25, 30). These findings
suggest lingering effects of nutrient and organic matter enrichment to
the system. This, combined with long water residence time, represents a
mechanism that could extend the short-term nutrient enrichment effects
of the floodwaters to multiannual enhancement of primary production and
nutrient cycling of PS. We conclude that the sustained elevated
chlorophyll a levels thus far observed are indicative of
longer-term nutrient (specifically nitrogen) retention and recycling
within this system. On the multiannual time scale, microbial denitrification may help purge
the system of the large nitrogen load associated with the floodwaters.
However, denitrification measurements thus far completed in the Neuse
River estuary indicate that annually, this process may remove only
about 20% of its external nitrogen load (S. Thompson et
al., unpublished results). Therefore, we do not expect
denitrification to be a mechanism capable of rapidly “cleansing”
the Sound of elevated nitrogen loading associated with floodwater
discharge. Phytoplankton community compositional changes in response to
freshwater discharge, depressed salinity, and nutrient enrichment could
additionally influence primary production, nutrient cycling, and
trophodynamics of this system. Preliminary evidence, based on
microscopic observations and HPLC analyses of photopigments diagnostic
for major phytoplankton functional groups, indicate that the enhanced
stimulation of phytoplankton production was distributed among taxa
normally dominant in this system (dinoflagellates, diatoms,
cryptophytes, and cyanobacteria) (31). However, a noticeable upsurge in
the relative dominance of cyanobacteria was observed in the lower Neuse
River estuary and PS (L. Twomey et al., unpublished
results). A reduction in salinity accompanied by nutrient enrichment is
known to stimulate cyanobacterial dominance in the upper Neuse River
estuary (32). Furthermore, cyanobacterial dominance in this system can
alter zooplankton grazer community structure and function (33),
indicating the potential for trophic changes associated with shifts in
phytoplankton community structure. Phytoplankton community changes could affect both food web
structure and nutrient flux. If, for example, zooplankton consumption
of phytoplankton is reduced in response to an increase in
cyanobacterial dominance (34), relatively less phytoplankton biomass
will be transferred to higher trophic levels. As a result, relatively
more phytoplankton-based organic matter will be transferred to the
sediments, enhancing microbial decomposition, oxygen consumption, and
nutrient regeneration. In long residence-time systems like the PS, this
scenario would ensure a long-term response to episodic nutrient-loading
events accompanying hurricanes. As the PS ecosystem recovers from the flooding effects, its
nursery function is also expected to recover. With sustained bottom
salinities nearly fresh for months, we expect most of the sessile
marine benthos in the Neuse River was killed. Indeed, in May 2000 we
observed newly set clams that were killed by low oxygen in the mouth of
the Neuse River estuary. Given the direct effects of depressed salinity
and low oxygen on shellfish and finfish as well as indirect effects
mediated through their benthic prey, one might expect reduced densities
of these organisms with potentially detrimental effects on fisheries.
The most profound fisheries effect was on blue crabs, for which Neuse
fishermen reported reduced catches beginning in May 2000. Neuse River
estuary sampling during summer 2000 shows blue crab abundances reduced
by at least a factor of 10 relative to catches in the same period
during 1997–1999. Fishermen also report reduced oyster and clam
landings in the affected area. We expect time lags in the expression of
these effects commensurate with the period before young-of-year fish
and shellfish recruit to the fisheries. Concluding Remarks The hurricanes of 1999 have provided perspective on how
intense meteorological events on the scale of multiple hurricanes can
induce both short- and longer-term biogeochemical and ecological
changes in a large coastal ecosystem. It is possible that the observed
and hypothesized estuarine responses provide a glimpse into effects of
future climatic trends on the structure and function of coastal
ecosystems. Increased tropical storm and hurricane activity is
predicted over the next few decades, and the hurricanes of 1999 may be
indicative of this phenomenon (35, 36). Such a trend merits close
scrutiny from both intensive monitoring and research perspectives,
because it could be indicative of long-term disruption of ecosystems
critical for fishery resources, economic development, and habitability
of the coastal zone. Acknowledgments We thank C. McClellan, L. Mitchum, H. Willis, T. Boynton, J.
Priddy, C. Stephenson, P. Wyrick, J. Purifoy, and S. Davis for field
and laboratory assistance. We appreciate the constructive reviews
provided by Drs. E. Gorham, G. Kleppel, and G. Woodwell. This research
was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
and North Carolina Sea Grant Program, the University of North
Carolina–Water Resources Research Institute (ModMon Project), the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and
the USGS. Ship time was provided by the Duke University Marine Lab and
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institute of Marine
Sciences. Abbreviations References 1. Copeland B J, Gray J. Status and Trends of the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuaries, Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study Report 90-01. Health & Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC: Dept. of Environment; 1991. 2. Bales J D, Nelson T M. Bibliography of Hydrologic and Water Quality Investigations Conducted in or Near the Albemarle-Pamlico Sounds Region. North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: USGS; 1988. , USGS Open-File Report 88-480. 3. Giese G L, Wilder H B, Parker G G. Hydrology of Major Estuaries and Sounds of North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: USGS; 1985. , USGS Water-Supply Paper 2221. 4. Neilson B J, Cronin L E. Estuaries and Nutrients. Clifton, NJ: Humana; 1981. 5. Pietrafesa L J, Janowitz G S, Chao T-Y, Weisberg H, Askari F, Noble E. The Physical Oceanography of Pamlico Sound. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Sea Grant Program; 1996. , Publ. UNC-WP-86-5. 6. Paerl H W, Mallin M A, Donahue C A, Go M, Peierls B L. Nitrogen Loading Sources and Eutrophication of the Neuse River Estuary, NC: Direct and Indirect Roles of Atmospheric Deposition. Raleigh, NC: Univ. North Carolina Water Resources Res. Inst.; 1995. , Report No. 291. 7. Matson E A, Brinson M M, Cahoon D D, Davis G J. Biogeochemistry of the Sediments of the Pamlico and Neuse River Estuaries, NC. Raleigh, NC: Univ. North Carolina Water Resources Res. Inst.; 1983. , Report No. 191. 8. Hobbie J E, Smith N W. Nutrients in the Neuse River Estuary, NC. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Sea Grant Program; 1975. , Report No. UNC-SG-75-21. 9. Kuenzler E J, Stone K L, Albert D B. Phytoplankton Uptake and Sediment Release of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in the Chowan River, NC. Raleigh, NC: Univ. North Carolina Water Resources Res. Inst.; 1982. , Report No. 186. 10. Christian R R, Boyer J N, Stanley D W. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1991;71:259–274. 11. Paerl H W, Pinckney J L, Fear J M, Peierls B L. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1998;166:17–25. 12. Paerl H W, Ramus J R. The Pamlico Sound: Water Quality Consequences of Anthropogenic Nutrient Enrichment and Reduction. Health & Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC: Dept. of Environment; 1998. 13. Bales J D, Oblinger C J, Sallenger A H. Two Months of Flooding in Eastern North Carolina, September–October 1999, Hydrologic, Water-Quality, and Geologic Effects of Hurricanes Dennis, Floyd, and Irene. Raleigh, NC: USGS; 2000. , USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4093. 14. USGS. Hydrology Subcommittee of the Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Guidelines for Determining Flood Frequency. Reston, VA: USGS Office of Water Data Collection; 1982. , USGS Bulletin 17B. 15. Benner R, Strom M. Mar Chem. 1993;41:153–160. 16. Jeffrey S W, Humphrey G F. Biochem Physiol Pflanzen. 1975;167:191–194. 17. Bales J D, Robbins J C. Simulation of Hydrodynamics and Solute Transport in the Pamlico River Estuary, North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: USGS; 1995. , USGS Open-File Report 94-454. 18. Robbins J C, Bales J D. Simulation of Hydrodynamics and Solute Transport in the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: USGS; 1995. , USGS Open-File Report 94-511. 19. Williams A B, Posner G S, Woods W J, Deubler E E. A Hydrographic Atlas of Larger North Carolina Sounds. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 1967. , Data Report 20. 20. Ruzecki E P, Schubel J H, Huggett R J, Anderson A M, Wass M L, Marasco R J, Lynch M P, editors. The Effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on the Chesapeake Bay Estuarine System. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press; 1976. , Chesapeake Bay Research Consortium Publication No. 54. 21. Stanley D W. Nitrogen Cycling and Phytoplankton Growth in the Neuse River, NC. Raleigh, NC: Univ. North Carolina Water Resources Res. Inst.; 1983. , Report No. 204. 22. Paerl H W, Rudek J, Mallin M A. Mar Biol. 1990;107:247–254. 23. Boyer J N, Stanley D W, Christian R R. Estuaries. 1994;17:361–371. 24. Lenihan H, Peterson C H. Ecol Appl. 1998;8:128–140. 25. Eby L A, Crowder L B, McClellan C. Neuse River Estuary Modeling and Monitoring Project, Stage 1, Effects of Water Quality on Distribution and Composition of the Fish Community. Raleigh, NC: Univ. of North Carolina Water Resources Res. Inst.; 2000. , Report 325C. 26. Renaud M L. Fish Bull USA. 1986;84:19–26. 27. Pihl L, Baden S P, Diaz R J. Mar Biol. 1991;108:349–360. 28. Winn R, Knott D. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1992;88:161–179. 29. Rizzo W G, Lackey G, Christian R R. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1992;86:51–61. 30. Luettich R A, McNinch J E, Pinckney J L, Alperin M, Martens C S, Paerl H W, Peterson C H, Wells J T. Neuse River Modeling and Monitoring Study (ModMon); Phase 1, 1997–1999. Raleigh, NC: Univ. of North Carolina Water Resources Res. Inst.; 2000. 31. Pinckney J L, Paerl H W, Harrington M B. J Phycol. 1999;35:1455–1463. 32. Paerl H W. Factors Regulating Nuisance Blue-Green Algal Bloom Potentials in the Lower Neuse River, NC. Raleigh, NC: Univ. of North Carolina Water Resources Res. Inst.; 1983. , Report No. 188. 33. Fulton R S, Paerl H W. Oecologia. 1988;76:383–389. 34. Lampert W. New Zealand J Mar Freshwater Res. 1987;21:483–490. 35. Gray W M, Sheaffer J D, Landsea C W. In: Hurricanes, Climatic Change and Socioeconomic Impacts: A Current Perspective. Diaz H F, Pulwarty R S, editors. Denver: Westview; 1996. 36. Landsea C W, Pielke R A, Mestaz-Nunez A M, Knaff J A. Climatic Changes. 1999;42:89–129. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||