• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Nat Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC Apr 11, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3324277

Epigenetic choreographers of neurogenesis in the adult mammalian brain


Epigenetic mechanisms regulate cell differentiation during embryonic development and also serve as important interfaces between genes and the environment in adulthood. Neurogenesis in adults, which generates functional neural cell types from adult neural stem cells, is dynamically regulated by both intrinsic state-specific cell differentiation cues and extrinsic neural niche signals. Epigenetic regulation by DNA and histone modifiers, non-coding RNAs and other self-sustained mechanisms can lead to relatively long-lasting biological effects and maintain functional neurogenesis throughout life in discrete regions of the mammalian brain. Here, we review recent evidence that epigenetic mechanisms carry out diverse roles in regulating specific aspects of adult neurogenesis and highlight the implications of such epigenetic regulation for neural plasticity and disorders.

Were Cajal alive today, he would perhaps be surprised to learn that many thousands of new neurons are generated every day in an adult mammalian brain1. The dogma that the adult mammalian CNS does not generate new neurons has been overturned2,3. Adult neurogenesis, which is broadly defined as a process of generating functional neural cell types from adult neural stem cells, occurs in two discrete areas of the mammalian brain48. In the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus in the hippocampus, adult neural stem cells undergo proliferation, fate specification, maturation, migration and eventual integration into the pre-existing neural circuitry9. Principal dentate granule cells are the only neuronal subtype that is generated, and newly generated neurons have distinct properties that enable them to contribute to specialized functions in learning and memory1012. In the subventricular zone (SVZ) of the lateral ventricle, adult neural stem cells give rise to glia and neuroblasts6,7. These neuroblasts migrate over a long distance to the olfactory bulb and differentiate into local interneurons that have various functions in olfaction.

Adult neurogenesis can be viewed as a classic process of cell differentiation, but it occurs in the unique environment of the mature nervous system. Intrinsically, adult neural stem cells pass through sequential developmental stages that show structurally and functionally distinct cellular properties. As noted by Holiday and Waddington1316, who originally coined the term ‘epigenetics’, cell differentiation during development results essentially from epigenetic changes to identical genomes through temporal and spatial control of gene activity. The process of adult neurogenesis is therefore intrinsically under similarly choreographed epigenetic control. Extrinsically, adult neurogenesis is precisely modulated by a wide variety of environmental, physiological and pharmacological stimuli. At the interface between genes and the environment17,18, epigenetic mechanisms naturally serve as key conduits for the regulation of adult neurogenesis by the environment, experience and internal physiological states in the form of local or systemic extracellular signaling molecules and patterns of neural circuit activity1921.

Epigenetic mechanisms imply cellular processes that do not alter the genomic sequence, and they are believed to elicit relatively persistent biological effects. Processes that can modulate DNA or associated structures independently of the DNA sequence, such as DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling and transcriptional feedback loops, are thought to constitute the main epigenetic mechanisms (Fig. 1a). DNA methylation at the 5-position of the nucleotide cytosine ring is relatively stable, and the maintenance DNA methyltransferase (Dnmt) ensures its epigenetic inheritance during DNA replication22,23 (Fig. 1b). A newly discovered modification of DNA, hydroxylation of the 5-methyl group, which gives rise to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, is present in various brain regions24 and in pluripotent stem cells25,26, although its biological function remains unknown. Specific amino-acid residues of histone N-terminal tails can be reversibly modified by different mechanisms, such as acetylation, phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation and isomerization (Fig. 1c). The varying turnover rates and biological interpreters of these modifications might underpin different epigenetic cellular functions22,27. In addition to chromatin-based epigenetic mechanisms, other self-sustaining processes might also be epigenetic in nature, such as prion-mediated perpetuation of protein conformation changes and transcriptional regulator–mediated autoregulatory feedback loops that are long-lasting in the absence of the initial trigger stimuli28,29. In proliferating neural stem cells, epigenetic mechanisms can elicit heritable long-lasting effects after many rounds of cell division. In postmitotic newborn neurons or mature neurons, epigenetic mechanisms may produce distinct effects as ‘cellular memory’ independent of cell division. Importantly, although epigenetic effects are relatively long-lasting, it is changes in epigenetic programs that help to choreograph the precisely timed transitions from one cellular state to another in coordination with both internal and external cues during adult neurogenesis.

Figure 1
Basic modes of epigenetic regulation implicated in adult neurogenesis. (a) To initiate epigenetic processes, extracellular and intracellular signals may trigger epigenetic ‘perpetuators’ that form self-sustaining feedback loops or intrinsically ...

In this review we first consider important methodological issues in studying the epigenetics of adult neurogenesis. We then discuss key epigenetic mechanisms that regulate specific stages of adult neurogenesis, and conclude by highlighting some general principles and their implications for our understanding of several brain disorders.

Technologies for epigenetic analysis of adult neurogenesis

The study of epigenetics in the context of the adult nervous system involves specific technical challenges. To profile chromatin-based epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation or histone modifications, it is usually necessary to analyze a large, relatively homogeneous population of cells, as each diploid cell has only two such gene-specific modifications. Moreover, in situ analysis using specific labeling reagents, such as antibodies, is limited to global changes in chromatin modification and lacks gene-specific resolution.

New technologies are now available to help researchers to overcome some of these obstacles (Fig. 2). Cells of sequential developmental stages are conventionally identified by immunophenotyping, labeling with thymidine analogs or retroviral infection5. Cell-surface antigens that are specific for adult neural progenitors have proven to be effective for flow cytometric isolation and purification30,31, although more specific antigens for the progeny of adult neural stem cells still need to be developed and the different subclasses of adult neural progenitors defined by these markers require additional functional characterization. Many transgenic reporter mouse lines have been generated in which specific classes of progenitors and newborn neurons are fluorescently labeled32,33, allowing targeted populations of live cells to be prospectively isolated in large numbers for analysis. In addition, methodologies have been developed to allow intact neuronal nuclei to be isolated from the brain34. The combined application of these technologies will be powerful and will make possible unprecedented epigenetic analyses of nearly every developmental stage during adult neurogenesis.

Figure 2
Classic and emerging technologies for epigenetic analysis of adult neurogenesis. During adult neurogenesis in the SGZ, neural stem cells (nestin+ and GFAP+) differentiate into immediate neural progenitors (Trb2+) and then newborn neurons (DCX+ and PSA-NCAM ...

Emerging technologies have also become available for more cost-effective, sensitive, precise and genome-wide scale measurements of epigenetic DNA and histone modifications. The gold standard in DNA methylation analysis has been bisulfite sequencing, in which methylated and unmethylated cytosines are distinguished after conversion of unmethylated but not methylated cytosines into uracils by bisulfite. However, this procedure causes substantial loss of samples and requires both a large amount of starting material and PCR amplification for Sanger-based sequencing. These obstacles have been essentially overcome by the recent development of significantly improved procedures, such as carrier supplementation and more sensitive and accurate bisulfite sequencing methods35,36. In addition, restriction enzyme–based quantitative methylation analysis is an independent approach for validation and is less labor-intensive. By taking advantage of next-generation sequencing technologies, researchers can now profile the DNA methylome at the genome scale with single-nucleotide resolution37,38.

The combined use of chromatin immunoprecipiation (ChIP; a method of profiling chromatin modifications at genomic loci) with RNA expression analysis, as well as new technical adjustments to these techniques, can help to identify biological signatures for activated or repressed chromatin states during adult neurogenesis. In ChIP, specific and effective antibodies are required to pull down chromatin fractions for quantitative detection of the DNA sequence. Variants of ChIP, such as sequential ChIP, can be used to detect the simultaneous presence of multiple histone modifications, such as the bivalent domain (H3K4 and H3K27 methylation) that is typical of genes that are poised for key developmental regulators in progenitor cells39. Another powerful variant, ChIP-seq, combines ChIP with next-generation sequencing for genome-wide profiling of histone modifications40. ChIP can also be used to profile DNA methylation and remains the method of choice to distinguish between DNA methylation and 5-methyl-cytosine hydroxylation24,41.

Epigenetic regulation of neural stem cell maintenance

Self-renewal and maintenance of developmental potentials are hallmarks of stem cells and are necessary for adult neural stem cells to generate neurons continuously throughout life. There is now evidence that the polycomb group protein Bmi1 is a key epigenetic regulator for these processes42 (Fig. 3a). The polycomb and trithorax group (PcG and TrxG) proteins are antagonistic chromatin complexes that silence or activate their target loci, respectively, and maintain corresponding expression states over many cell divisions43,44. Bmi1 is a member of the PcG complex that catalyzes H3K27 methylation, whereas the TrxG complex catalyzes H3K4 methylation. SVZ-derived adult neural stem cells, but not lineage-restricted progenitors, are depleted in Bmi1 knockout mice42. The effect of Bmi1 seems to be mediated by the cell cycle inhibitor p16 protein, as mice lacking both Bmi1 and p16 have an almost normal number of adult neural stem cells. Furthermore, Bmi1 overexpression in vitro significantly increases the number of adult neural stem cells in the SVZ and maintains their developmental potential to generate neuronal lineages45,46. Given that the effect of Bmi1 overexpression in vivo might depend on its dose and that Bmi1 is also required for the self-renewal of postnatal neural stem cells45,47, conditional loss-of-function studies should provide more direct evidence for the role of Bmi1 in regulating adult neural stem cells in the SVZ. It also remains mechanistically unclear how Bmi1 would maintain the self-renewal of adult neural stem cells in the SVZ by regulating methylation of its target H3K27. One appealing model is that the methylation of H3K27 by the PcG complex silences crucial genes that are required for neural differentiation over many cell divisions to promote self-renewal as a form of ‘cellular memory’43,44.

Figure 3
Major epigenetic regulators of adult neurogenesis. (a) Current understanding of epigenetic regulation of adult neurogenesis in SGZ and SVZ. Adult neural progenitors undergo proliferation and generate neuroblasts that can further differentiate into mature, ...

Methyl-CpG binding protein 1 (Mbd1) has emerged as a crucial and specific regulator of adult neural stem cells in the SGZ. Mbd1 knockout mice show no detectable developmental defects and appear healthy throughout life, but they have severely reduced adult neurogenesis and impaired spatial learning48. Among several Mbd family proteins, only Mbd1 specifically affects postnatal neurogenesis in the SGZ48,49. Mechanistically, Mbd1 binds to the promoter of the gene that encodes fibroblast growth factor 2 (Fgf2), a mitogen for adult neural progenitors, and regulates its expression in adult SGZ neural progenitors in a manner that depends on DNA methylation48,50. The regulated expression of Fgf2 in adult neural stem cells might allow temporally appropriate neuronal differentiation both in vitro and in vivo. Surprisingly, as a methyl-CpG ‘reader’ protein, Mbd1 also seems to affect DNA methylation levels per se50, suggesting that Mbd1 may recruit unidentified DNA methyltransferases to form propagating feedback loops that silence its target genes over many rounds of cell division. Such long-term silencing propagation would, in principle, be similar to the action of the PcG complex in promoting the self-renewal of adult neural stem cells in the SVZ, although these two mechanisms enact different epigenetic silencing machineries in different brain regions.

In addition to PcG-mediated histone modifications and DNA methylation, self-sustaining feedback loops that are mediated by transcription factors are truly epigenetic in nature29 and have critical roles in maintaining adult neural stem cells. A member of the Sox (SRY-related HMG box) transcription factor family, Sox2 is highly expressed in both SVZ and SGZ neural stem cells but not in their neuronal progeny51,52. Sox2 gene products bind to numerous genomic targets, including its own promoter, to form a feedback loop, which is characteristic of the cell regulatory circuitry for self-renewing stem cells51,53,54. Together with several other transcription factors, Sox2 might constitute a key part of the feedback and feedforward networks in regulating other downstream genes that are crucial for stem cell maintenance. In adult mice, Sox2 marks a self-renewing, multipotent population of SGZ neural stem cells and is required for their self-renewal and maintenance of neuronal developmental potential52. In addition to autoregulatory loops, Sox2 participates in another feedback pathway by enhancing the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr), which, in turn, upregulates Sox2 expression in neural stem cells55. Sox2 might thus promote self-renewal and mediate epigenetic inheritance of adult neural stem cell properties by forming self-sustaining transcriptional pathways that are immune to the perturbations of cell divisions but remain permissive to multi-lineage differentiation cues.

Epigenetic regulation of neural stem cell differentiation

Unlike the silencing PcG complex, TrxG proteins establish stable and transcriptionally active chromatin domains by catalyzing and maintaining histone tail H3K4 methylation43. One TrxG member, Mll1 (mixed-lineage leukemia 1), encodes an H3K4 methyltransferase. Mll1 is specifically required for neuronal, but not glial, differentiation from adult neural stem cells56. The homeobox protein Dlx2 has been identified as one direct target of Mll1 and is crucial for neurogenesis in the SVZ. ChIP analysis has provided evidence that Mll1 binds to the Dlx2 promoter, but H3K4 methylation is normal in the Mll1 binding loci of Dlx2 in differentiating SVZ cells from mice lacking Mll1. Instead, Mll1 deficiency leads to the abnormal presence of a bivalently marked chromatin, with both H3K4 and H3K27 methylation, at the Dlx2 locus. Mll1 therefore seems to recruit an H3K27 demethylase that is required to resolve silenced bivalent loci in SVZ neural stem cells for proper neuronal, but not glial, differentiation. More recent work suggests that Jmjd3, an H3K27 demethylase, is required for neuronal fate commitment and terminal differentiation from neural stem cells during embryonic development57. It is unclear whether such a TrxG-mediated chromatin switching mechanism might directly oppose the PcG-mediated cellular silencing program. The H3K27 demethylase that is requited for neurogenesis in the adult SVZ also remains to be identified. Nonetheless, current evidence suggests that the TrxG complex cooperates with PcG antagonists to help to switch neural stem cells from a PcG-mediated self-renewal state into a neuronal differentiation state.

Histone acetylation and deacetylation are also powerful epigenetic mechanisms that are associated with gene activation or repression, respectively, through histone acetyltransfeases (HATs) and deacetylases (HDACs; Fig. 1c). Inactivation of HDAC activities by HDAC inhibitors leads to marked enhancement of neuronal differentiation from adult neural stem cells in the SGZ58. In these stem cells, HDAC silences the expression of key neurogenic transcription factors, such as NeuroD1, and of cell-cycle regulators through gene-specific recruitment by the transcription factor Tlx1 (ref. 59). A deficiency of one member of the HDAC family, HDAC2, results in specific and cell-autonomous defects in neural differentiation during adult but not embryonic neurogenesis60. Compared with PcG-mediated silencing mechanisms, which are stable, HDAC-mediated histone deacetylation seems to be more dynamic6163. The use of epigenetic marks with distinct turnover properties might enable adult neural stem cells to control different complements of genes that are required for appropriately timed cell-cycle exit, fate specification and terminal differentiation programs (Fig. 3a).

Small non-coding RNAs (microRNAs or miRNAs) have emerged as an important class of gene regulators that use different mechanisms of action but form intricate regulatory interaction networks with chromatin modifiers and transcription factors6466. Many members of the small RNA family that regulate adult neurogenesis have been identified (Fig. 3a). First, miR-184 functions as a direct target of Mbd1 to inhibit neuronal differentiation from adult neural stem cells in the SGZ67. Mechanistically, miR-184 acts through post-transcriptional repression of Numb-like, which regulates neuronal differentiation during development. Second, miR-137 has been identified as a direct target of Sox2 and another DNA methyl-CpG-binding protein, MeCP2, that inhibits neuronal differentiation and maturation in adult SGZ neural stem cells68,69. Interestingly, miR-137 represses the translation of Ezh2, an H3K27 methyltransferase and PcG complex protein, and this leads to a global reduction of H3K27 methylation in adult neural stem cells in the SGZ68. Thus, adult SGZ neural stem cells may require miR-137 to balance global H3K27 levels while maintaining gene-specific bivalent domains through PcG-mediated epigenetic mechanisms. Third, one of the most abundant microRNAs in the adult brain, miR-124, is both required and sufficient to promote neuronal differentiation from adult SVZ neural stem cells70. Interestingly, one crucial target that mediates the action of miR-124 in this system is another Sox family protein, Sox9. Functionally, miR-124–mediated repression of Sox9 ensures correct cell state progression along the SVZ stem cell lineage to neurons. In addition, a small modulatory RNA has also been shown to trigger neuronal gene expression from adult neural stem cells by inhibiting the action of the REST-NRSF (repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor and neuron restrictive silencer factor) transcriptional machineries71. REST-NRSF potently represses neuronal genes, partly by suppressing miR-124 and switching the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes during neural differentiation72,73. There is therefore accumulating evidence that diverse members of the small RNA family are recruited for fine-tuning cellular epigenetic programs to ensure temporally choreographed transitions between cell differentiation states during adult neurogenesis.

Long interspersed nuclear element-1 (L1) comprises about 17% of the human genome. It is thought to be active only in the germline or during early development and is silenced by epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation during somatic cell differentiation (Fig. 3b). However, recent studies using both rodent and human neural progenitors have provided surprising evidence that L1 can be actively retrotransposing and thus modifying the genomic sequence during neuronal differentiation74,75. Such non-epigenetic mechanisms might help to create neuronal diversity by fine-tuning the expression of neuronal genes on a cell-by-cell basis and could also contribute to individual somatic mosaicism in the adult brain76. Even though post-insertional mutagenesis of L1 in neurons is not strictly considered to be epigenetic, the expression of L1 before insertion during neurogenesis is believed to be controlled by epigenetic mechanisms. In humans, L1 seems to be more active in the brain than in other tissues and its activity is inversely correlated with the DNA methylation of its regulatory sites from different tissues74. In adult neural stem cells, the transcription factor Sox2 (ref. 75) and the Wnt signaling effector Tcf77 associate with the L1 promoter and coordinate to regulate L1 transcription75. The simultaneous presence of both activating transcription factors and repressing silencing effectors may be important to maintain the L1 promoter in a poised state. Interestingly, both voluntary exercise and extracellular Wnt signaling seem to activate L1 retrotranspositions77,78. Furthermore, L1 retrotranspositions can alter neuronal gene expression to functionally affect neuronal differentiation processes75. Epigenetic processes that tightly regulate L1 activity might therefore represent another intriguing cellular response mechanism to external cues that could modulate adult hippocampal neurogenesis by mobilizing DNA retrotransposons.

Epigenetic regulation of the neurogenic niche

The entire process of adult neurogenesis is dynamically modulated by many environmental stimuli, local niche signals and diverse external cues4,21,79. Thus, epigenetic mechanisms involved in adult neurogenesis also include those that take place in adult neurogenic niche cells that actively communicate with and regulate the development of adult neural stem cells and their progeny. Although the epigenetic machinery in adult neural stem cells and their progeny may respond directly to ambient signals, there is emerging evidence that specialized niche cells, such as mature neurons, are ideally suited to use their own epigenetic mechanisms to translate various transient external cues into long-lasting modifications of adult neurogenic processes.

Gadd45b has been identified as a key epigenetic regulator that links activity-induced changes in DNA methylation in mature neurons to modulation of neurogenesis in the adult SGZ80,81. Gadd45b is an activity-induced immediate early gene, so its transcription is sensitive to various transient stimuli that can stably increase adult neurogenesis80. Activity-induced expression of Gadd45b in mature dentate granule neurons near the SGZ promotes DNA demethylation of several genes that are crucial for adult neurogenesis, including the genes for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Bdnf) and fibroblast growth factor (Fgf), with demethylation occurring in their specific promoters. After transient stimulation, the demethylated status of CpGs within these promoters persists for at least several days. Furthermore, Gadd45b knockout mice show specific deficits in neuronal activity-induced proliferation of adult neural progenitors and dendritic growth of newborn neurons. Thus, Gadd45b seems to function as a sensor in mature neurons for environmental stimuli and translates transient neural activity into relatively more stable nuclear epigenetic changes in DNA methylation to elicit lasting modifications of local circuit connectivity through adult neurogenesis.

In mature neurons, MeCP2 is another key epigenetic regulator that directly controls Bdnf expression in an activity-dependent manner8284. MeCP2 is abundant in mature dentate granule neurons, and MeCP2 knockout mice show pronounced deficits in the maturation of newborn neurons in the SGZ, including delayed neuronal differentiation, altered neuronal gene expression and reduced dendritic spine density85. It is unclear to what extent the deficiency of MeCP2 contributes to these neuronal maturation defects in mature neurons and glia as niche cells or in newborn neurons in a cell-autonomous fashion. One role for MeCP2 in mature neurons might be to interpret the reversible DNA methylation status of genes mediated by activity-regulated actions of Dnmts and Gadd45b proteins80,86. As well as DNA methylation, other epigenetic modifications seem to be dynamically controlled by the activity-dependent regulation of chromatin remodeling and modifying enzymes, including HATs and HDACs in mature neurons61,62,87. Regulation of niche signaling molecules such as Bdnf by these mechanisms in mature dentate neurons might serve as an additional mechanism through which epigenetic processes influence neurogenesis.

Endothelial and glial cells function in both the SVZ and the SGZ as important niche cells for adult neurogenesis79. Niche signaling molecules have been shown to regulate various process in adult neurogenesis5,88. Therefore, epigenetic analyses of these cells under defined stimulus conditions represent interesting avenues for future exploration.

Implications for brain tumors and mental disorders

Adult neurogenesis is a highly orchestrated process that requires extensive epigenetic mechanisms for its regulation. Conversely, epigenetic dysregulation of adult neurogenesis can lead to pathological cell states, as seen in many neurological diseases. The key regulator of self-renewal for adult neural stem cells in the SVZ, Bmi1, is an oncogene; its overexpression or overactivation of the associated PcG complex stimulates tumor growth in several types of glioblastoma and specifically sustains the self-renewal of cancer stem cells42,89. Similarly, many types of brain tunor that are resistant to cell differentiation, which might originate from adult neural progenitors, have abnormal patterns of DNA methylation and histone modification, reflecting the failure of epigenetic switches that normally guide them into neural differentiation pathways89,90.

A wide variety of detrimental stress stimuli that can lead to depression generally reduce the rate of adult SGZ neurogenesis, whereas chemical antidepressants and electroconvulsive treatments (ECT) markedly enhance neurogenesis in the adult SGZ91,92. Functionally, adult SGZ neurogenesis has been suggested to mediate the effects of antidepressants92. The finding that Gadd45b is strongly activated by ECT and is required for ECT-induced adult neurogenesis suggests that it might help to mediate the effects of antidepressants and also implicates epigenetic mechanisms involving changes in DNA methylation in the pathological processes that lead to depression.

Several neuropsychiatric disorders in humans or animal models feature defective or abnormal adult neurogenesis caused by aberrant epigenetic mechanisms that regulate intrinsic or extrinsic aspects of adult neurogenesis5,19,21. Mouse models of the autistic spectrum disorder Rett syndrome, in which the disease is caused by a deficiency in MeCP2, show maturation defects in adult-born neurons. Several core deficits that are frequently associated with autism are seen in Mbd1 knockout mice, which have markedly reduced adult SGZ neurogenesis and dysregulation of adult neural progenitors in the SGZ93. Bdnf, a regulator of adult neurogenesis, is subjected to diverse epigenetic regulation80,9497. The human variant of Bdnf that is crucial genetic predispositions to depressive disorders causes anxiety-related behaviors when modeled in mice and impairs neurogenesis in the adult SVZ and olfactory behavior98,99. In many cases, it remains to be investigated whether specific disease-related gene deficiencies can cell-autonomously cause the observed phenotypes and how abnormal adult neurogenesis might directly contribute to disease etiology and manifestation of symptoms. Nonetheless, adult neurogenesis is highly sensitive to many physiological, pathological and environmental stimuli, responding with diverse epigenetic mechanisms for its intrinsic and extrinsic regulation. Therefore, we propose that studies of explicitly observable and explicable phenotypic defects in any aspect of the process of adult neurogenesis will provide a unique glimpse into the pathology and mechanistic basis of brain disorders100.


Adult neurogenesis is a developmental process that occurs in the environment of the mature nervous system and represents a striking form of neural plasticity in the adult brain. The process of adult neurogenesis is intrinsically controlled by extensive epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modification and transcriptional feedback loops, which ensure that cells undergo transitions through sequential stages of neurogenesis in coordination with other cellular programs. Long-lasting effects elicited by some of these epigenetic mechanisms seem to mainly promote the self-renewal of adult neural stem cells. Bridging the gap between the environment and the genome, epigenetic mechanisms also act extrinsically through neurogenic niche cells, translating transient environmental signals into relatively long-term modification of neurogenesis in the adult brain. Together, intrinsic and extrinsic epigenetic mechanisms help to maintain adult neurogenesis throughout life and contribute to its activity-dependent regulation.

Epigenetics, especially in the field of adult neurogenesis, is still in its nascent stage. Technical challenges have largely limited the widespread application of the conventional epigenetic toolkit for studying adult neurogenesis in vivo. Several emerging technologies are now overcoming technical obstacles to enable epigenetic analysis to be carried out in a more accurate and sensitive manner and on a genome-wide scale. The next few years will probably see exciting progress toward answering current questions and the discovery of new modes and principles that underlie the epigenetic regulation of adult neurogenesis. Recapitulating almost the entire neuronal developmental process—including neural fate specification, neuronal morphogenesis, migration, axonal and dendritic development, and the formation, maturation and maintenance of synapses—adult neurogenesis also presents an excellent model for understanding the biological roles of many disease-susceptibility genes that are involved in epigenetic processes that regulate specific aspects of neural development and functions. Therefore, future research in the field should greatly facilitate our understanding of those diseases and provide potential new avenues for therapeutic development.


We thank M.L. Gage and K. Christian for comments on the manuscript and J. Simon for illustrations. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants NS048271 and HD069184 (G.-l.M.), MH088485 and MH090258 (F.H.G.), and AG024984, NS047344 and MH087874 (H.S.), the Brain Science Institute at Johns Hopkins and National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (G.-l.M.), the Mathers Foundation, the Lookout Fund and the J.S. McDonnell Foundation (F.H.G.), a Helen Hay Whitney Foundation postdoctoral fellowship (D.K.M.), and the Dr. Richard and Mavis Fowler and the Foundation for Advanced Research in the Medical Sciences Fellowship (J.U.G.).



The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Reprints and permissions information is available online at http://www.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/.


1. Cameron HA, McKay RD. Adult neurogenesis produces a large pool of new granule cells in the dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol. 2001;435:406–417. [PubMed]
2. Altman J, Das GD. Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. J Comp Neurol. 1965;124:319–335. [PubMed]
3. Gage FH. Mammalian neural stem cells. Science. 2000;287:1433–1438. [PubMed]
4. Alvarez-Buylla A, Lim DA. For the long run: maintaining germinal niches in the adult brain. Neuron. 2004;41:683–686. [PubMed]
5. Ming GL, Song H. Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian central nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:223–250. [PubMed]
6. Lledo PM, Alonso M, Grubb MS. Adult neurogenesis and functional plasticity in neuronal circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:179–193. [PubMed]
7. Zhao C, Deng W, Gage FH. Mechanisms and functional implications of adult neurogenesis. Cell. 2008;132:645–660. [PubMed]
8. Ma DK, Bonaguidi MA, Ming GL, Song H. Adult neural stem cells in the mammalian central nervous system. Cell Res. 2009;19:672–682. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Duan X, Kang E, Liu CY, Ming GL, Song H. Development of neural stem cell in the adult brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008;18:108–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Kempermann G, Wiskott L, Gage FH. Functional significance of adult neurogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:186–191. [PubMed]
11. Deng W, Aimone JB, Gage FH. New neurons and new memories: how does adult hippocampal neurogenesis affect learning and memory? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:339–350. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Kitabatake Y, Sailor KA, Ming GL, Song H. Adult neurogenesis and hippocampal memory function: new cells, more plasticity, new memories? Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2007;18:105–113. [PubMed]
13. Holliday R. Mechanisms for the control of gene activity during development. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1990;65:431–471. [PubMed]
14. Goldberg AD, Allis CD, Bernstein E. Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell. 2007;128:635–638. [PubMed]
15. Waddington CH. Principles of Development and Differentiation. Macmillan; New York: 1966.
16. Holliday R. Epigenetics: a historical overview. Epigenetics. 2006;1:76–80. [PubMed]
17. Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33 (Suppl):245–254. [PubMed]
18. Zhang TY, Meaney MJ. Epigenetics and the environmental regulation of the genome and its function. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:439–466. [PubMed]
19. Covic M, Karaca E, Lie DC. Epigenetic regulation of neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Heredity. 2010;105:122–134. [PubMed]
20. Hsieh J, Eisch AJ. Epigenetics, hippocampal neurogenesis and neuropsychiatric disorders: unraveling the genome to understand the mind. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;39:73–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Ma DK, Kim WR, Ming GL, Song H. Activity-dependent extrinsic regulation of adult olfactory bulb and hippocampal neurogenesis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2009;1170:664–673. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Cedar H, Bergman Y. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:295–304. [PubMed]
23. Holliday R. Epigenetic inheritance based on DNA methylation. EXS. 1993;64:452–468. [PubMed]
24. Kriaucionis S, Heintz N. The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science. 2009;324:929–930. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Tahiliani M, et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 2009;324:930–935. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Ito S, et al. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature. 2010;466:1129–1133. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science. 2001;293:1074–1080. [PubMed]
28. Serio TR, Lindquist SL. Protein-only inheritance in yeast: something to get [PSI+]-ched about. Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10:98–105. [PubMed]
29. Ptashne M. On the use of the word ‘epigenetic’ Curr Biol. 2007;17:R233–R236. [PubMed]
30. Capela A, Temple S. LeX/ssea-1 is expressed by adult mouse CNS stem cells, identifying them as nonependymal. Neuron. 2002;35:865–875. [PubMed]
31. Pastrana E, Cheng LC, Doetsch F. Simultaneous prospective purification of adult subventricular zone neural stem cells and their progeny. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:6387–6392. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Kanki H, Shimabukuro MK, Miyawaki A, Okano H. “Color Timer” mice: visualization of neuronal differentiation with fluorescent proteins. Mol Brain. 2010;2:3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Encinas JM, Enikolopov G. Identifying and quantitating neural stem and progenitor cells in the adult brain. Methods Cell Biol. 2008;85:243–272. [PubMed]
34. Heiman M, et al. A translational profiling approach for the molecular characterization of CNS cell types. Cell. 2008;135:738–748. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Goren A, et al. Chromatin profiling by directly sequencing small quantities of immunoprecipitated DNA. Nat Methods. 2010;7:47–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. O’Neill LP, VerMilyea MD, Turner BM. Epigenetic characterization of the early embryo with a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol applicable to small cell populations. Nat Genet. 2006;38:835–841. [PubMed]
37. Ball MP, et al. Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:361–368. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Lister R, et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. 2009;462:315–322. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Bernstein BE, et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2006;125:315–326. [PubMed]
40. Roh TY, Ngau WC, Cui K, Landsman D, Zhao K. High-resolution genome-wide mapping of histone modifications. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1013–1016. [PubMed]
41. Jin SG, Kadam S, Pfeifer GP. Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:e125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Molofsky AV, et al. Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature. 2003;425:962–967. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Ringrose L, Paro R. Polycomb/Trithorax response elements and epigenetic memory of cell identity. Development. 2007;134:223–232. [PubMed]
44. Ng RK, Gurdon JB. Epigenetic inheritance of cell differentiation status. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:1173–1177. [PubMed]
45. Fasano CA, et al. Bmi-1 cooperates with Foxg1 to maintain neural stem cell self-renewal in the forebrain. Genes Dev. 2009;23:561–574. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Fasano CA, et al. shRNA knockdown of Bmi-1 reveals a critical role for p21-Rb pathway in NSC self-renewal during development. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:87–99. [PubMed]
47. He S, et al. Bmi-1 over-expression in neural stem/progenitor cells increases proliferation and neurogenesis in culture but has little effect on these functionsin vivo. Dev Biol. 2009;328:257–272. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Zhao X, et al. Mice lacking methyl-CpG binding protein 1 have deficits in adult neurogenesis and hippocampal function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:6777–6782. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Martín Caballero I, Hansen J, Leaford D, Pollard S, Hendrich BD. The methyl-CpG binding proteins Mecp2, Mbd2 and Kaiso are dispensable for mouse embryogenesis, but play a redundant function in neural differentiation. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4315. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Li X, et al. Epigenetic regulation of the stem cell mitogen Fgf-2 by Mbd1 in adult neural stem/progenitor cells. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:27644–27652. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Episkopou V. SOX2 functions in adult neural stem cells. Trends Neurosci. 2005;28:219–221. [PubMed]
52. Suh H, et al. In vivo fate analysis reveals the multipotent and self-renewal capacities of Sox2+ neural stem cells in the adult hippoampus. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:515–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Boyer LA, et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2005;122:947–956. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Jaenisch R, Young R. Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell. 2008;132:567–582. [PubMed]
55. Hu Q, et al. The EGF receptor-sox2-EGF receptor feedback loop positively regulates the self-renewal of neural precursor cells. Stem Cells. 2010;28:279–286. [PubMed]
56. Lim DA, et al. Chromatin remodeling factor Mll1 is essential for neurogenesis from postnatal neural stem cells. Nature. 2009;458:529–533. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Jepsen K, et al. SMRT-mediated repression of an H3K27 demethylase in progression from neural stem cell to neuron. Nature. 2007;450:415–419. [PubMed]
58. Hsieh J, Nakashima K, Kuwabara T, Mejia E, Gage FH. Histone deacetylase inhibition-mediated neuronal differentiation of multipotent adult neural progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:16659–16664. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Sun G, Yu RT, Evans RM, Shi Y. Orphan nuclear receptor TLX recruits histone deacetylases to repress transcription and regulate neural stem cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:15282–15287. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Jawerka M, et al. The specific role of histone deacetylase 2 in adult neurogenesis. Neuron Glia Biol. 2010 April 14; doi: 10.1017/S1740925X10000049. published online. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Crepaldi L, Riccio A. Chromatin learns to behave. Epigenetics. 2009;4:23–26. [PubMed]
62. Zocchi L, Sassone-Corsi P. Joining the dots: from chromatin remodeling to neuronal plasticity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010;20:432–440. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Wang Z, et al. Genome-wide mapping of HATs and HDACs reveals distinct functions in active and inactive genes. Cell. 2009;138:1019–1031. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Morris KV. Non-coding RNAs, epigenetic memory and the passage of information to progeny. RNA Biol. 2009;6:242–247. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Hobert O. Gene regulation by transcription factors and microRNAs. Science. 2008;319:1785–1786. [PubMed]
66. Iorio MV, Piovan C, Croce CM. Interplay between microRNAs and the epigenetic machinery: an intricate network. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 May 20; doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.05.005. published online. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
67. Liu C, et al. Epigenetic regulation of miR-184 by MBD1 governs neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:433–444. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Szulwach KE, et al. Cross talk between microRNA and epigenetic regulation in adult neurogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2010;189:127–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Smrt RD, et al. MicroRNA miR-137 regulates neuronal maturation by targeting ubiquitin ligase mind bomb-1. Stem Cells. 2010;28:1060–1070. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Cheng LC, Pastrana E, Tavazoie M, Doetsch F. miR-124 regulates adult neurogenesis in the subventricular zone stem cell niche. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:399–408. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Kuwabara T, Hsieh J, Nakashima K, Taira K, Gage FH. A small modulatory dsRNA specifies the fate of adult neural stem cells. Cell. 2004;116:779–793. [PubMed]
72. Juliandi B, Abematsu M, Nakashima K. Chromatin remodeling in neural stem cell differentiation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010;20:408–415. [PubMed]
73. Yoo AS, Staahl BT, Chen L, Crabtree GR. MicroRNA-mediated switching of chromatin-remodelling complexes in neural development. Nature. 2009;460:642–646. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Coufal NG, et al. L1 retrotransposition in human neural progenitor cells. Nature. 2009;460:1127–1131. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Muotri AR, et al. Somatic mosaicism in neuronal precursor cells mediated by L1 retrotransposition. Nature. 2005;435:903–910. [PubMed]
76. Muotri AR, Gage FH. Generation of neuronal variability and complexity. Nature. 2006;441:1087–1093. [PubMed]
77. Kuwabara T, et al. Wnt-mediated activation of NeuroD1 and retro-elements during adult neurogenesis. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1097–1105. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
78. Muotri AR, Zhao C, Marchetto MC, Gage FH. Environmental influence on L1 retrotransposons in the adult hippocampus. Hippocampus. 2009;19:1002–1007. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
79. Ma DK, Ming GL, Song H. Glial influences on neural stem cell development: cellular niches for adult neurogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:514–520. [PubMed]
80. Ma DK, et al. Neuronal activity-induced Gadd45b promotes epigenetic DNA demethylation and adult neurogenesis. Science. 2009;323:1074–1077. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Ma DK, Guo JU, Ming GL, Song H. DNA excision repair proteins and Gadd45 as molecular players for active DNA demethylation. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:1526–1531. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
82. Martinowich K, et al. DNA methylation-related chromatin remodeling in activity-dependent BDNF gene regulation. Science. 2003;302:890–893. [PubMed]
83. Zhou Z, et al. Brain-specific phosphorylation of MeCP2 regulates activity-dependent Bdnf transcription, dendritic growth and spine maturation. Neuron. 2006;52:255–269. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
84. He DY, Neasta J, Ron D. Epigenetic regulation of BDNF expression via the scaffolding protein rack1. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:19043–19050. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
85. Smrt RD, et al. Mecp2 deficiency leads to delayed maturation and altered gene expression in hippocampal neurons. Neurobiol Dis. 2007;27:77–89. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
86. Feng J, et al. Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a maintain DNA methylation and regulate synaptic function in adult forebrain neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:423–430. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
87. Qiu Z, Ghosh A. A calcium-dependent switch in a CREST-BRG1 complex regulates activity-dependent gene expression. Neuron. 2008;60:775–787. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
88. Mu Y, Lee SW, Gage FH. Signaling in adult neurogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010;20:416–423. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
89. Dirks P. Bmi1 and cell of origin determinants of brain tumor phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:295–297. [PubMed]
90. Nagarajan RP, Costello JF. Epigenetic mechanisms in glioblastoma multiforme. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19:188–197. [PubMed]
91. Banasr M, Duman RS. Regulation of neurogenesis and gliogenesis by stress and antidepressant treatment. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2007;6:311–320. [PubMed]
92. Sahay A, Hen R. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis in depression. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1110–1115. [PubMed]
93. Allan AM, et al. The loss of methyl-CpG binding protein 1 leads to autism-like behavioral deficits. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:2047–2057. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
94. Li Y, et al. TrkB regulates hippocampal neurogenesis and governs sensitivity to antidepressive treatment. Neuron. 2008;59:399–412. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Roth TL, Sweatt JD. Epigenetic marking of the BDNF gene by early-life adverse experiences. Horm Behav. 2010 May 17; doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.05.005. published online. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
96. Kuzumaki N, et al. Hippocampal epigenetic modification at the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene induced by an enriched environment. Hippocampus. 2010 March 15; doi: 10.1002/hipo.20775. published online. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
97. Nelson ED, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM. Activity-dependent suppression of miniature neurotransmission through the regulation of DNA methylation. J Neurosci. 2008;28:395–406. [PubMed]
98. Bath KG, et al. Variant brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Val66Met) alters adult olfactory bulb neurogenesis and spontaneous olfactory discrimination. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2383–2393. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
99. Chen ZY, et al. Genetic variant BDNF (Val66Met) polymorphism alters anxiety-related behavior. Science. 2006;314:140–143. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
100. Christian K, Song H, Ming GL. Adult neurogenesis as a cellular model to study schizophrenia. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:636–637. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...