• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of scirepLink to Publisher's site
Sci Rep. 2012; 2: 251.
Published online Feb 7, 2012. doi:  10.1038/srep00251
PMCID: PMC3273854

HMGA1 is a novel downstream nuclear target of the insulin receptor signaling pathway

Abstract

High-mobility group AT-hook 1 (HMGA1) protein is an important nuclear factor that activates gene transcription by binding to AT-rich sequences in the promoter region of DNA. We previously demonstrated that HMGA1 is a key regulator of the insulin receptor (INSR) gene and individuals with defects in HMGA1 have decreased INSR expression and increased susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition, there is evidence that intracellular regulatory molecules that are employed by the INSR signaling system are involved in post-translational modifications of HMGA1, including protein phosphorylation. It is known that phosphorylation of HMGA1 reduces DNA-binding affinity and transcriptional activation. In the present study, we investigated whether activation of the INSR by insulin affected HMGA1 protein phosphorylation and its regulation of gene transcription. Collectively, our findings indicate that HMGA1 is a novel downstream target of the INSR signaling pathway, thus representing a new critical nuclear mediator of insulin action and function.

HMGA1 is a small basic protein that binds to adenine-thymine (A–T) rich regions of DNA and functions mainly as a dynamic regulator of chromatin structure and gene transcription1. Although without intrinsic transcriptional activating activity, HMGA1 acts as an ‘architectural’ transcription factor that can transactivate promoters through mechanisms that facilitate the assembly and stability of a multicomponent enhancer complex, the so-called enhanceosome, that drives gene transcription in response to multiple extracellular and intracellular signals2,3. Such signals may affect HMGA1 function by inducing changes in post-translational protein modifications (including methylation, acetylation and phosphorylation) that markedly influence HMGA1 ability to interact with DNA substrates, other proteins and chromatin2,4,5,6,7. DNA-binding activity of HMGA1 is reduced by HMGA1 phosphorylation, whereas protein dephosphorylation increases HMGA1-DNA binding affinity8,9, suggesting a mechanism in which variations in the protein's biological activity can be specifically produced through mechanisms of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of HMGA1, leading to gene repression or activation, respectively.

Previous observations in vitro suggest that changes in HMGA1 protein phosphorylation may occur in a mechanism involving the intracellular regulatory molecules INSR substrate-1 (IRS-1) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K)10 that are critical intermediate steps in transmitting the signal from the INSR. On the other hand, a relationship between HMGA1 and the INSR signaling system has been demonstrated before, showing that HMGA1 is a key regulator of the expression of the INSR, a major component of the insulin signaling pathway11,12. However, the precise role and function of HMGA1 phosphorylation in the INSR signaling system have not yet been addressed and more empirical evidence is needed to ascertain the biological significance of this HMGA1 post-translational modification and its regulation within this context. Based on our findings in the present work, we are currently proposing that HMGA1 (specifically the HMGA1a isoform) is a novel downstream target of the INSR signaling pathway, which may play an important role in the regulation of insulin signaling and action in vivo.

Results

Activation of IGFBP-1 gene transcription by HMGA1 and its suppression by insulin

Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) is a major member of the superfamily of IGF binding proteins. Under physiological circumstances (e.g., in response to food and exercise), IGFBP-1 seems to be an important determinant in regulating IGF-I bioavailability and bioactivity13,14. By binding endogenous IGF-I during fasting, IGFBP-1 may serve to prevent the hypoglycemic effects of IGF-I, thus supporting a physiological role for IGFBP-1 in glucose counterregulation15. Insulin plays a major role in the regulation of IGFBP-1, rapidly suppressing its production by the liver at the level of gene transcription15. Instead, a positive role of HMGA1 in IGFBP-1 gene expression has been postulated previously on the basis of experimental evidence showing that HMGA1 binds the IGFBP-1 gene promoter16. Consistent with this latter possibility, we previously found that IGFBP-1 expression was considerably reduced in Hmga1-knockout mice17. To investigate whether a functional link could be established between the INSR signaling system and HMGA1, we first performed experiments to see if HMGA1 had a direct role in activating IGFBP-1 gene transcription. As shown in reporter gene assays, overexpression of HMGA1 significantly increased IGFBP-1-luciferase (IGFBP-1-Luc) activity in cells of both human (HepG2) and mouse (Hepa1) origin, and this effect occurred in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S1). Consistent with this, endogenous IGFBP-1 mRNA was reduced in cells pretreated with siRNA targeting HMGA1 (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S1), indicating that activation of the IGFBP-1 gene requires HMGA1. These results were corroborated by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled with qRT-PCR of ChIP-ed samples, showing that binding of HMGA1 to the endogenous IGFBP-1 chromosomal locus was increased in living HepG2 cells naturally expressing HMGA1, and was considerably decreased in cells exposed to siRNA against HMGA1 (Fig. 1b). A functional link between insulin and HMGA1, at this level, was substantiated by showing that insulin-mediated inhibition of IGFBP-1 protein production was abolished in HepG2 cells markedly depleted of HMGA1 (Fig. 1c), as well as in cells treated with distamycin A (Fig. 1d), a small molecule inhibitor of HMGA1 protein binding to DNA12. Insulin per se had no effect on HMGA1 protein expression in HepG2 cells (Fig. 1c,d), in which inhibition of IGFBP-1 protein production by insulin paralleled closely the decrease in HMGA1 occupancy at the endogenous IGFBP-1 locus (Fig. 1e,f).

Figure 1
Functional significance of HMGA1 for IGFBP-1 expression.

INSR signaling and HMGA1 activity

The relevance of HMGA1 for the INSR signaling system was supported in studies in vivo, under physiological circumstances where endogenous insulin production can vary (e.g., in response to fed and fasting states). As detected by ChIP in vivo coupled to qRT-PCR, HMGA1-DNA interaction was disrupted in liver of insulin-injected mice (Fig. 2a). Similar results were confirmed in liver from normal mice with augmented insulin levels as obtained after meal ingestion. As shown in Fig. 2a, binding of HMGA1 to the IGFBP-1 locus was increased in mice under physiological fasting conditions when nutrients are limited, insulin levels are decreased and the insulin signaling cascade (IRS-1/PI-3K/Akt) is abrogated. Conversely, HMGA1-DNA interaction promptly decreased after refeeding, when insulin levels increase and insulin signaling is reactivated (Fig. 2a).

Figure 2
HMGA1 DNA-binding activity and function is regulated by insulin.

To probe further the role of HMGA1 in this signaling pathway, we examined the effect of wortmannin, a potent and selective inhibitor of the PI-3K/Akt cascade18, on HMGA1-mediated stimulation of IGFBP-1 in liver from insulin treated mice. Systemic treatment with wortmannin had no effect on the expression of the protein kinase Akt in liver; however, it significantly inhibited the level of insulin-induced Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 2b). Treatment with wortmannin resulted in 50–55% decrease by comparison with immunoblotting intensity for phosphorylated Akt in liver treated with insulin and vehicle (Fig. 2b). As measured by ChIP in vivo, on whole liver, and subsequent qRT-PCR of ChIP-ed samples, as a consequence of the inactivation of PI-3K/Akt cascade, occupancy of the IGFBP-1 promoter by HMGA1 was increased in wortmannin-treated mice compared to mice injected with insulin (Fig. 2b). Thus, these data suggest that HMGA1 can elicit in vivo functional responses that are acutely regulated through the INSR signaling pathway, whose activation/deactivation state appears to be decisive in the control of HMGA1-DNA interaction and function. This conclusion was substantiated by the following additional experimental observations, which revealed that an inverse correlation between increased IRS-1 phosphorylation and decreased HMGA1 DNA-binding activity existed in liver from insulin-injected mice, as measured by immunoprecipitation/western blot (IP/WB) of cytoplasmic proteins and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) of liver nuclear extracts, respectively (Fig. 2c). Accordingly, IGFBP-1 mRNA abundance was reduced in liver from insulin-treated animals, and this reduction paralleled the decrease in IGFBP-1 protein levels as detected by IP/WB from liver lysates (Fig. 2c). Inhibition of insulin signaling in vivo, using the pharmacological PI-3K inhibitor wortmannin, by increasing HMGA1 DNA-binding, partially reversed the inhibition of IGFBP-1 mRNA and protein expression by insulin (Fig. 2d), thus indicating that phosphorylation of HMGA1 represents a fundamental step in INSR signaling and that functional regulation of HMGA1 by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation may be important during acute (short-term) regulation of glucose homeostasis in response to both hormonal and nutritional changes. This conclusion was supported by studies in primary cultured hepatocytes, showing that repression by insulin of the gluconeogenic genes phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase), as well as the IGFBP-1 gene, was differentially affected in primary cultured cells from normal wild-type and Hmga1-null mice. As shown in Fig. 2e, mRNA expression of PEPCK, G6Pase and IGFBP-1 was lower in primary hepatocytes from Hmga1-null mice than in untreated wild-type-derived cells; following insulin treatment, mRNA levels for these genes decreased by 50% in cells from control mice, whereas no changes were detected in cells from mutant animals, indicating that the regulation of HMGA1, by changing its phosphorylation, is a critical event mediating the insulin's effect on these genes and that insulin action on gluconeogenesis is at least in part mediated by HMGA1.

Insulin induced post-translational phosphorylation of HMGA1 and its dynamic interaction with DNA

Phosphorylation of HMGA1 and its relevance for the INSR signaling system was investigated in detail in studies of post-translational modifications and nuclear localization of HMGA1 both in vitro and in vivo, following insulin treatment. As measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), a significant early increase of the tri-phosphorylated HMGA1a isoform protein was detectable in HepG2 cells at 30 min after insulin addition (Fig. 3a). Specificity of the insulin-induced HMGA1a phosphorylation was substantiated by the observation that HMGN1, an HMG protein not involved in INSR signaling, did not change its phosphorylation state during insulin treatment (Fig. 3b). Consistently with the assumption that reduced HMGA1-DNA interaction after meals may reflect the physiological increase in insulin secretion and insulin signaling, enhanced HMGA1a phosphorylation was confirmed also in vivo, in liver from insulin-injected mice (Fig. 3c). As for other chromatin proteins, the apparently small magnitude of insulin-induced HMGA1 protein phosphorylation, both in HepG2 cells and in mouse liver, is compatible with the activation of a signaling pathway impinging on selected factors positioned at the level of specific regulatory sequences. In this regard, phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 or 28 in the induction of immediate-early genes downstream of the MAPK pathways, constitutes one of the most striking examples19. As determined by tryptic-peptide mapping of the phosphorylated protein and the relative extracted ion count (EIC) of the peptides, di- and tri-phosphorylation of HMGA1 occurred predominantly at the C-terminal peptide 88-106 (Supplementary Fig. S2), a region known to be critical for HMGA1-DNA contact10,20. Constitutive and inducible phosphorylation at this level involves the serine residues Ser98, Ser101 and Ser102 and it has been demonstrated to be dependent on PI-3K via a casein kinase 2 (CK2)-like specificity10,21. Whether detachment of HMGA1 from DNA is due to a direct or indirect mechanism, our data demonstrate that phosphorylation of the C-terminal tail is linked to this event. This view was supported by experiments performed with the highly specific CK2 inhibitor 4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1H-benzimidazole (TBB), showing that both detachment of HMGA1 from DNA and inhibition of endogenous IGFBP-1 mRNA by insulin were prevented by inhibiting CK2 kinase activity (Fig. 3d), while the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor alsterpaullone and the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor Gö6976 had no effects on these functions (Supplementary Fig. S3). The role of the multiple serine residues Ser98-Ser101-Ser102 on insulin action has been confirmed in functional studies in which simultaneous substitution of all three residues with nonphosphorylatable alanines prevented insulin-inhibition of IGFBP-1-Luc reporter activity in transfected HEK-293 cells (Fig. 3e). When examined individually, the single substitution mutants (Ser98 → Ala, Ser101 → Ala, Ser102 → Ala) also repressed insulin inactivation of IGFBP-1-Luc (Fig. 3e), indicating that the phosphorylation of Ser98, Ser101 and Ser102 are each indispensable for insulin activity. Differences in the magnitude of Luc activity in HEK-293 cells transfected with single-substitution mutants suggest that transactivation by HMGA1 is dependent on both the number and position of phosphate groups on the HMGA1 C-terminal tail. This is consistent with our previous finding which showed that phosphorylation of the multiple serine residues at the HMGA C-terminus is not a random event, as the phosphorylation of a serine residue can influence phosphorylation at an adiacent site9. Also, these results confirm the current view on the role of the acidic C-terminal tail phosphorylation in the negative modulation of HMGA DNA-binding properties and thus in their transactivation ability9,20. No hyperphosphorylation of HMGA1a, besides that occurring at the C-terminal tail, was detected after insulin treatment. On the contrary, a slight decrease in the phosphorylation status of some peptides (aa 1–6, 7–14, 18–22, 30–54, and 71–73) was detected (Supplementary Fig. S4 and Supplementary Table S1). Some of them contain serine/threonine residues near the HMGA1 DNA-binding domains, supporting the notion that decreased HMGA1a DNA-binding affinity after insulin treatment is dependent on phosphorylation of the acidic C-terminal tail of HMGA1 (Supplementary Data).

Figure 3
Insulin-induced HMGA1 phosphorylation and its intranuclear distribution in living cells.

The effect of insulin-induced phosphorylation on nuclear distribution of HMGA1 was then investigated in living cells. Analysis with the green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged HMGA1a (GFP-HMGA1a) revealed that, in serum-starved HepG2 cells, the GFP-HMGA1a fusion protein was preferentially located within the transcriptionally active euchromatin in the nuclear interior (Fig. 3f). After 15 min of insulin treatment there was a marked redistribution of GFP-HMGA1a from this site to the repressed inactive heterochromatin, in a circumferential distribution within the nucleus, becoming more evident at 30 min (Fig. 3f). Pretreatment with the PI-3K inhibitor wortmannin totally reversed insulin-induced heterochromatin foci formation and resulted in a more diffuse and homogenous distribution of GFP-HMGA1a throughout the entire nucleus similarly to that in starved control cells (Fig. 3f). To verify the specificity of insulin-induced phosphorylation on nuclear localization of HMGA1, we examined the nuclear distribution of the mutant GFP-HMGA1am (mimicking dephosphorylation), in which the three active serine phosphorylation sites at the C-terminus were mutated to nonphosphorylatable alanines. As shown in Fig. 3f, insulin elicited no effect on this mutant, confirming that phosphorylation at these sites was essential for regulating HMGA1 activity by insulin. Mobility analysis by photoactivation confirmed that, in serum-starved HepG2 cells, the photoactivable GFP protein (PAGFP)-tagged HMGA1a (PAGFP-HMGA1a) was preferentially located in the nuclear interior (Supplementary Video S1). Once again, insulin treatment caused a marked redistribution of PAGFP-HMGA1a from the nuclear interior site to the peripheral region of the nucleus, and this effect was reversed by wortmannin and was prevented in cells expressing the mutant PAGFP-HMGA1am protein (Supplementary Video S1). Thus, these results indicate that insulin is mechanistically involved in the dynamic interaction of HMGA1 with DNA/chromatin in vivo.

Insulin-induced INSR downregulation is mediated by HMGA1 phosphorylation

Downregulation of INSR mRNA by insulin has been demonstrated in vitro with several cell types22. Indeed, we previously showed that mRNA for the INSR was upregulated in insulin-starved mammalian cells23,24, in which this rise was paralleled closely by a rise in a small nuclear protein (later found to be HMGA1)11,24. In the present work, to probe further the relevance of HMGA1 for the INSR signaling system, we carried out studies in cultured HepG2 cells as well as in mice, demonstrating that phosphorylation of HMGA1 is an essential and necessary prerequisite for the insulin-induced INSR downregulation either in vitro or in vivo. As shown in Fig. 4a, HepG2 cells upregulate the INSR mRNA in the absence of serum, conditions that induce the dephosphorylation and activation of HMGA1; conversely, insulin was able to reverse this effect. Inhibition of INSR expression by insulin was abolished in HepG2 cells almost completely depleted of HMGA1 (Fig. 4a). Consistently with our model, inhibition of INSR mRNA by insulin in HepG2 cells paralleled closely the decrease in HMGA1 occupancy at the endogenous INSR locus (Fig. 4a). In concert with these observations, INSR mRNA abundance was increased in liver from 12 h-fasted normal mice (Fig. 4b,c) and was reduced in mice with augmented insulin levels as obtained following either systemic administration of insulin (Fig. 4b), or after meal ingestion (Fig. 4c). As with IGFBP-1 gene, binding of endogenous HMGA1 to the INSR gene locus was increased in liver from mice under physiological fasting conditions, when the insulin signaling cascade is attenuated (Fig. 4b,c), and promptly decreased following insulin injection (Fig. 4b) or after refeeding (Fig. 4c), when insulin signaling is reactivated, indicating that HMGA1 acts as a molecular switch for activating or deactivating INSR expression during the fasting and refeeding periods, respectively. In line with this, insulin failed to suppress INSR mRNA in the absence of HMGA1, as observed in primary cultured hepatocytes from HMGA1-null mice (Fig. 4d), and no changes on INSR mRNA levels were observed in insulin-treated HEK-293 cells overexpressing single (HMGA1am-Ser) or triple (HMGA1am) HMGA1 protein mutants (Fig. 4d).

Figure 4
Insulin-induced INSR downregulation is mediated by HMGA1 phosphorylation.

Thus, these data collectively underscore the importance of the architectural factor HMGA1 in the context of the INSR signaling pathway, and establish HMGA1 as a novel key player in the nutritionally and insulin-regulated transcription of genes involved in glucose metabolism.

Discussion

The intracellular signaling pathways by which changes in gene expression are triggered by insulin are only partly identified and more investigations are needed to decipher the molecular mechanisms of this transcriptional regulation. The initial interaction of insulin with target cells is via its receptor located in the plasma membrane25,26,27. Upon binding of insulin, the INSR undergoes autophosphorylation which enables the receptor to have a kinase activity and phosphorylates various cytoplasmic INSR substrates (IRSs). From this point, signaling proceeds via a variety of signaling pathways (i.e. PI-3K signaling pathway, Ras and MAP kinase cascade) that are responsible for the metabolic, growth-promoting and mitogenic effects of insulin. Based on these considerations, it is possible, therefore, that insulin-regulated transcription of genes involved in glucose metabolism may result, at least in part, from posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation, that can affect access of transcription factors to DNA, thereby silencing and/or unsilencing gene expression. This possibility, that would account for the pleiotropic effects of this hormone, is greatly supported by our current findings here, indicating that, by inducing HMGA1 protein phosphorylation, insulin is directly and mechanistically involved in the dynamic interaction of HMGA1 with DNA/chromatin in vivo, thus in the control of gene activity.

Here we provide evidence that HMGA1 plays an essential role in the transcriptional regulation of a variety of insulin-target genes such as IGFBP-1 and INSR genes, as well as the gluconeogenic genes PEPCK and G6Pase. IGFBP-1 is distinctive among the IGFBPs, as its plasma concentrations show marked diurnal variations due to hormonal and metabolic changes. IGFBP-1 is thought to be the primary IGF binding protein involved in the acute regulation of serum glucose levels28. Fasting hyperglycemia with impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance has been demonstrated in rats after the injection of IGFBP-128, as well as in transgenic mice overexpressing IGFBP-129, in the presence of reduced concentrations of circulating free IGF-I. Given that IGFBP-1 serum levels were considerably decreased in Hmga1-knockout mice17 and IGFBP-1 mRNA expression was also reduced in HepG2 cells by siRNA targeting HMGA1, it appears reasonable to interpret that insulin-induced functional inactivation of HMGA1, by adversely affecting the production of IGFBP-1 protein species, could serve as a mechanism to increase the insulin-like effects of endogenous IGF-I, thereby contributing to the maintenance of postprandial glucose homeostasis. The contribution of HMGA1 to the postprandial regulation of glucose homeostasis is supported by our observations in primary cultured hepatocytes, indicating that repression of the gluconeogenic genes PEPCK and G6Pase by insulin requires HMGA1. Consistent with these observations, we previously found that the counter-regulatory hormone glucagon, which acts in opposition to insulin to maintain a euglycemic (normal) state, upregulates HMGA1 protein production in vivo in whole mice30. Based on our findings here, it is likely that upregulation of HMGA1 during fasting (when glucagon peaks) may also contribute to the maintenance of fasting euglycemia. In addition, the hypothesis that HMGA1, by increasing fasting serum IGFBP-1, may contribute to restrict glucose uptake by peripheral tissues, thereby sparing glucose for the brain and other glucose-dependent tissues, is also supported.

The molecular mechanisms regulating INSR gene expression have been elucidated and evidence has been provided showing that HMGA1 is required for proper transcription of the INSR gene in mammals11,12. HMGA1 acts on the INSR gene promoter as an element necessary for the formation of a transcriptionally active multiprotein-DNA complex involving, in addition to the HMGA1 protein, the ubiquitously expressed transcription factor Sp1 and the CCAAT-enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBPβ)12. By potentiating the recruitment and binding of Sp1 and C/EBPβ to the INSR promoter, HMGA1 greatly enhances the transcriptional activities of these factors in the context of the INSR gene12. As demonstrated in this study, consistently with the observation that functional repression of endogenous HMGA1 is strictly dependent on insulin-induced HMGA1 phosphorylation, INSR gene expression was considerably reduced in vitro, in insulin-treated HepG2 cells, and in vivo, in liver from normal mice with augmented insulin levels as obtained following insulin injection or after a meal.

The possibility that intracellular regulatory molecules that are employed by the INSR signaling system could be involved in post-translational modifications of HMGA1, including protein phosphorylation, has been postulated before, on the basis of experimental observations in vitro, involving the novel PKCε isotype that has recently been shown to be linked to the insulin signaling pathway31. The literature, however, does not provide explanation on how these modifications occur and function in concert. Herein, we provide data that help explain these issues and add new insights into the physiological mechanistic details governing INSR signal transduction. In view of our results on the HMGA1 post-translational modifications, it appears likely that variations in the biological activity of HMGA1 can be specifically produced in response to hormonal and nutritional changes through mechanisms of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of the HMGA1 protein, leading to gene repression or activation, respectively. These findings may not only play a role under physiological circumstances related to acute metabolic and hormonal responses (e.g., after a meal, or when insulin decreases during fasting), but may also contribute to pathophysiological pathways in a range of blood sugar-related disorders, in which insulin levels are chronically elevated. In this regard, data have been published indicating that type 2 diabetes mellitus may occur in humans and mice carrying HMGA1 gene defects, in which abnormalities of both the insulin-receptor signaling system and the IGF-I–IGFBP-1 system were identified17,32,33.

The FOXO (forkhead) family of transcription factors are critical regulators of insulin action, and cytoplasm retention of FOXOs via phosphorylation is suggested to be a mechanism of insulin-mediated IGFBP-1 and INSR gene repression34,35,36. The possibility that an interplay among HMGA1 and FOXO can be a component of this regulation constitutes an interesting point that will deserve further consideration. Compared to previous investigations, for the first time in the present study, we report the identification of HMGA1 as a novel downstream nuclear target of the INSR signaling pathway, which may play a major role in insulin-dependent gene expression and regulation in mammals. This, in our opinion, is interesting from both biological and mechanistic points of view and might be useful in understanding the molecular basis of clinical phenotypes in certain conditions where insulin action becomes compromised (i.e. diabetes mellitus, obesity and other insulin-resistant syndromes). Understanding these mechanisms should augment our capacity to identify novel therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of these diseases.

Methods

Plasmid construction and transfections, nuclear distribution and photoactivation analysis and qRT-PCR

Primers used for plasmid construction of human IGFBP-1 promoter-containing vector: 5′-TAGCCCCTGAGCTCTGCCTAG-3′ (containing Sac I restriction site) and 5′-ACAGGGGCCGAAGCTTTCTGG-3′ (containing Hind III restriction site). PCR products were subcloned into pGL3-basic vector (Promega) at the indicated restriction sites. Recombinant Luc reporter construct in the presence or absence of effector vector for HMGA1 (HMGA1a isoform protein)12, were transiently transfected into HepG2 cells, using LipofectAMINE 2000 reagent (Invitrogen), and Luc activity was assayed 48 h later in a luminometer (Turner Biosystems), using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). siRNA targeted to human HMGA137, plus nonspecific siRNA controls with a similar GC content were obtained from Dharmacon. 100–200 pmol siRNA duplex was transfected into cells at 40% to 50% confluency. After knockdown for 72 h, the cells were trypsinized, pooled, and resuspended for a second transfection using the same targeting siRNA. After an additional 72 h, cells were prepared for analysis. Renilla control vector served as an internal control of transfection efficiency, together with measurements of protein expression levels. Site-directed mutagenesis of the serine phosphorylation sites of HMGA1a was carried out by using the site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) with the following pair of PCR primers (5′-AAGAGGAGGGCATCGCGCAGGAGGCCGCGGAGGAGGAGCAG-3′ and 5′-CTGCTCCTCCTCCGCGGCCTCCTGCGCGATGCCCTCCTCTT-3′, sites for mutagenesis are underlined) to yield single and triple HMGA1a mutants.

To produce GFP-HMGA1a and PAGFP-HMGA1a expression plasmids, the human HMGA1a ORF (NCBI Ref. Seq. NM_145899.2) was cloned into BamHI/XbaI sites of pGFP (Clontech) or PAGFP expression vector (a kind gift from Dr. Faretta, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy), respectively. HepG2 cells were transfected with either wild-type or mutant GFP-HMGA1a or PAGFP-HMGA1a effector plasmid, spotted the day after on glass bottom poly-D-lysine coated plates (Met-Tek Corporation), and used for time-lapse imaging or photoactivation studies, respectively. For time-lapse studies, images were collected on a Leica TCS-SP2 confocal microscope (Leica Mycrosystems) with a 63x Apo PLA oil immersion objective (NA 1.4) and 60-μm aperture. GFP-expressing cells were visualized by excitation with an argon laser at 488 nm and photomultiplier tube voltage of 420 mV. For photoactivation studies, transfected cells were first identified by scanning for low levels of expression of PAGFP-SmB using a 405 pulse at 5% laser power, then confocal analysis was performed on selected cells following cell activation by a 200 msec 406 nm pulse at 100% laser power focused to a spot of approximately 1.5 μm diameter. A series of single Z-sections of each cell was recorded over 1 min after photoactivation using a FITC filter.

For qRT-PCR, total cellular RNA was extracted from cells and tissue using the RNAqueous-4PCR kit and subjected to DNase treatment (Ambion). RNA levels were normalized against 18S ribosomal RNA in each sample, and cDNAs were synthesized from 2 μg of total RNA using the RETROscript first strand synthesis kit (Ambion). Primers for mouse IGFBP-1 (NM_008341) (5′-CCTAACTGTTGTTTCTTGGC-3′; 5′-AGAAATCTCGGGGCACGAA-3′), human IGFBP-1 (NM_000596.2) (5′-CATTCCATCCTTTGGGAC-3′; 5′-ATTCTTGTTGCAGTTTGGCAG-3′), human INSR (NM_000208.2) (5′-TTTGGGAAATCACCAGCTTGGCAGAAC-3′; 5′-AAAGCTGGGGTGCAGGTC GTCCTTG-3′), mouse INSR (NM_010568) (5′-TATGACGACTCGGCCAGTGA-3′; 5′-ATCTGGAAGTGTGAGTGTGG-3′), mouse PEPCK1 (NM_011044) (5′-GTGTCATCCGCAAGCTGAAGA-3′; 5′-CTTTCGATCCTGGCCACATCT-3′), mouse G6Pase (NM_008061) (5′-CTGCCAGGGAGAACTCAGCAA-3′; 5′-GAGGACCAAGGAAGCCACAAT-3′) were designed according to sequences from the GenBank database. A real-time thermocycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler ep realplex ES) was used to perform quantitative PCR. In a 20-μl final volume, 0.5 μl of the cDNA solution was mixed with SYBR Green RealMasterMix (Eppendorf), and 0.3 μM each of sense and antisense primers. The mixture was used as a template for the amplification by the following protocol: a denaturing step at 95°C for 2 min, then an amplification and quantification program repeated for 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 55°C for 25 s, and 68°C for 25 s, followed by the melting curve step. SYBR Green fluorescence was measured, and relative quantification was made against RPS9 cDNA used as an internal standard. All PCR reactions were done in triplicates.

Animals

All animal work was conducted according to institutional guidelines for the care of laboratory animals. For the wortmannin studies, wild-type mice were given single bolus injections of wortmannin (1 mg/kg bw) or vehicle (0.5% DMSO) alone via the tail vein, followed 1 h later by an intraperitoneal injection of insulin (1 U/kg bw). The liver was harvested 4 h after insulin injection to determine Akt phosphorylation and HMGA1-DNA binding, in addition to IGFBP-1 expression. INSR mRNA and ChIP of the INSR promoter gene were analysed in liver from 12 h-fasted mice after intraperitoneal injection of insulin (1 U/kg bw) or saline and after 4 h refeeding. Mouse hepatocytes were isolated as described elsewhere38. Primary hepatocytes were cultured on matrigel-coated six-well plates in Williams E media (Sigma) supplemented with 10% FBS. 1.5−2.5×106 cells were allowed to adhere for 2–3 h and were then incubated in serum-free DMEM containing 0.1% BSA. Cells were maintained in this medium overnight (12 h) and then utilized in subsequent experiments.

ChIP

ChIP assay was performed in cultured HepG2 cells, either untreated or pretreated with HMGA1 siRNA as described previously17,39. For in vivo ChIP, at the end of the indicated treatments, mice were killed by cervical dislocation, the liver was rapidly removed, prewarmed with PBS, and treated with collagenase (0.2%) for 15 min. The liver was then diced, forced through a 60 µm stainless steel sieve, the hepatocytes were collected directly into DMEM containing 1% formaldehyde, and the formaldehyde-fixed DNA-protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with anti-HMGA1 antibody17,39. Sequence-specific primers for IGFBP-1 and INSR gene promoters used for PCR amplification of ChIP DNA (30 cycles), using PCR ready-to-go beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech): human IGFBP-1 (NT_007819) for 5′-CAGAAAGAGAAGCAATTCCG-3′, rev 5′-TACCAGCCAGACGCGAGCAA-3′; mouse IGFBP-1 (NT_039515) for 5′-CCTGGGGAGGGAGAAACAACT-3′, rev 5′-GCAGTGTTCAATGCTCGCTGG-3′; human INSR (NT_11255.14) for 5′-AGATCTGGCCATTGCACTC-3′, rev 5′-ATGCCAGTTCTGGGGAGGTA-3′; mouse INSR (NC_000074.5) for 5′-TTGTTGGGCGCCTACTAGC-3′, rev 5′-AAACACAAGTAACACCGAGG-3′. Primers for ChIP with non-AT-rich sequences: human IGFBP-1 locus [for 5′-AGTAGAGATGGGGTTTTGCC-3′ (−2266/−2247 from the ATG), rev 5′- GATAGCAATGCCTTCTTGTG-3′ (−2022/−2003 from the ATG)]; human INSR locus [for 5′-TCCCCTGCAAGCTTTCCCTC-3′ (−586/−567 from the ATG), rev 5′-TACTGAGCGGAGGCCCTTGCGGT-3′ (−226/−204 from the ATG). PCR products were electrophoretically resolved on 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Primers for qRT-PCR ChIP-ed samples are available upon request.

IP/WB

These assays were performed to analyse IGFBP-1 protein expression in HepG2 cells and in whole-cell liver extracts (1 mg) from treated and untreated mice, using a polyclonal specific antibody raised against IGFBP-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For the measurement of IRS-1 and Akt phosphorylation, protein extracts (1 mg) from mice were prepared and analysed as previously described17. IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation was assayed after IP of total lysates with antibody to IRS-1, followed by immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. WBs for Akt were performed using antibody that recognizes only phosphorylated Ser473 form of Akt and antibody that recognizes total (nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated) Akt in liver. The antibodies used for these studies were: anti-phosphotyrosine, anti-IRS-1, anti-Akt, anti-pAkt (Upstate Biotechnology). A polyclonal-specific antibody against HMGA111 was used to analyse HMGA1 protein expression in HepG2 cells.

EMSA

Nuclear extracts were prepared from liver of wild-type animals, injected or not with insulin, and binding of HMGA1 to DNA was assessed using a32P-labeled oligonucleotide duplex corresponding to the human INSR E3 promoter element11,24. In supershift assays nuclear protein was preincubated with 1 µg polyclonal antibody to HMGA1 before addition of the probe.

HMGA protein extraction, HPLC, LC-MS and LC-MS/MS analyses

HMG proteins from HepG2 cells were selectively extracted by treating cells with 5% perchloric acid (PCA), precipitated by acetone-HCl, resuspended in water and their presence confirmed by SDS-PAGE9. By employing these conditions, endogenous HMG proteins were also extracted from the whole liver of wild-type mice intraperitoneally injected with insulin (1 U/kg bw) or saline after 12 h fasting. Reverse-phase HPLC chromatography and LC-MS analyses were carried out using a PerkinElmer Life Sciences apparatus (Series 200 LC Pump), using a RP Supelco Discovery BIO Wide Pore C5 column (2.1×250 mm, 5 μm) directly interfaced with an ESI interface to an ion trap HCTultra mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). HPLC separations were carried out using a water/acetonitrile gradient with 0.05% TFA as a modifier. MS parameters were the following: full MS scan: m/z 600–1100; mass range mode: standard/enhanced; ion charge control (ICC) active allowing the storage of a maximum of 200000 ions in a maximum accumulation time of 200 msec. LC-MS were elaborated with Data Analysis software (version 3.4, Bruker Daltonics). Identities of proteins were obtained by comparison of theoretical with experimental molecular masses, taking into consideration combinations of the various post-translational modifications. LC-MS/MS analyses were performed as previously described9 and were used to map the phosphorylation increase in HMGA1a sequence. HMGA1a protein was extracted from control and insulin treated HepG2 cells and purified (HPLC). Equal amounts of HMGA1a were then trypsin digested and LC-MS/MS analysed. Among all the peptides found, the phosphorylated counterparts were searched.

Statistics

Statistical significance was evaluated using a 2-tailed Student's t test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. All bar graph data shown represent mean ± s.e.m.

Author Contributions

E.C. participated in the analysis and discussion of the data and drafting of the manuscript; M.N. and C.P. performed photoactivation studies; S.I. and F.P. performed western blot, EMSA and transfection studies; E.M., R.S. and G.M. contributed with in vitro and in vivo studies of post-translation modifications; B.A., K.P. and A.N. participated in ChIP analysis and performed qRT-PCR and cloning studies; D.F. contributed to the data analysis and provided helpful and critical reading of the manuscript; G.B. participated in the analysis and discussion of data from fasting and fed mice; A.B. conceived, coordinated and supervised the study, analysed the data and wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information:

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information:

Video S1

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Dr L. Levintow for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Dr I.D. Goldfine for helpful discussion and suggestions, and F.S. Brunetti for his help in artwork preparation. This work was supported by Telethon-Italy, grant GGP04245, and MIUR, protocol 2004062059-002 Italy, to A. Brunetti.

References

  • Bustin M. & Reeves R. High-mobility group proteins: architectural components that facilitate chromatin function. Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. 54, 35–100 (1996). [PubMed]
  • Reeves R. Molecular biology of HMGA proteins: hubs of nuclear function. Gene 277, 63–81 (2001). [PubMed]
  • Thanos D. & Maniatis T. Virus induction of human IFN beta gene expression requires the assembly of an enhanceosome. Cell 83, 1091–1100 (1995). [PubMed]
  • Oñate S. A. et al. The DNA-bending protein HMG-1 enhances progesterone receptor binding to its target DNA sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 3376–3391 (1994). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Falvo J. V., Thanos D. & Maniatis T. Reversal of intrinsic DNA bends in the IFN beta gene enhancer by transcription factors and the architectural protein HMG I(Y). Cell 83, 1101–1111 (1995). [PubMed]
  • Reeves R. & Nissen M. S. Cell cycle regulation and functions of HMG-I(Y) .Prog. Cell Cycle Res. 1, 339–349 (1995). [PubMed]
  • Huth J. R. et al. The solution structure of an HMG-I(Y)-DNA complex defines a new architectural minor groove binding motif. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 657–665 (1997). [PubMed]
  • Edberg D. D., Bruce J. E., Siems W. F. & Reeves R. In vivo post-translational modifications of the High Mobility Group A1a proteins in breast cancer cells of differing metastatic potential. Biochemistry 43,11500–11515 (2004). [PubMed]
  • Sgarra R. et al. Macroscopic differences in HMGA oncoproteins post-translational modifications: C-terminal phosphorylation of HMGA2 affects its DNA binding properties. J. Proteome Res. 8, 2978–2989 (2009). [PubMed]
  • Wang D-Z., Ray P. & Boothby M. Interleukin 4-inducible Phosphorylation of HMG-I(Y) is Inhibited by Rapamycin. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22924–22932 (1995). [PubMed]
  • Brunetti A., Manfioletti G., Chiefari E., Goldfine I. D. & Foti D. Transcriptional regulation of human insulin receptor gene by the high-mobility group protein HMGI(Y). FASEB J. 15, 492–500 (2001). [PubMed]
  • Foti D., Iuliano R., Chiefari E. & Brunetti A. A nucleoprotein complex containing Sp1, C/EBPβ, and HMGI-Y controls human insulin receptor gene transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 2720–2732 (2003). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Baxter R. C. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins: interactions with IGFs and intrinsic bioactivities. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 278, E967–E976 (2000). [PubMed]
  • Clemmons D. R. Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins and their role in controlling IGF actions. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 8, 45–62 (1997). [PubMed]
  • Lee P. D. K., Conover C. A. & Powell D. R. Regulation and function of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 204, 4–29 (1993). [PubMed]
  • Allander S. V. et al. Hepatic nuclear factor 3 and high mobility group I/Y proteins bind the insulin response element of the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 promoter. Endocrinology 138, 4291–4300 (1997). [PubMed]
  • Foti D. et al. Lack of the architectural factor HMGA1 causes insulin resistance and diabetes in humans and mice. Nat. Med. 11, 765–773 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Arcaro A. & Wymann M. P. Wortmannin is a potent phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor: the role of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate in neutrophil responses. Biochem. J. 296, 297–301 (1993). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Drobic B., Pérez-Cadahìa B., Yu J., Kung S. K. & Davie J. R. Promoter chromatin remodeling of immediate-early genes is mediated through H3 phosphorylation at either serine 28 or 10 by the MSK1 multi-protein complex. Nucleic Acids Res 38, 3196–3208 (2010). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Piekielko A. et al. Distinct organization of DNA complexes of various HMGI/Y family proteins and their modulation upon mitotic phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 276, 1984–1992 (2001). [PubMed]
  • Sgarra R. et al. Nuclear phosphoproteins HMGA and their relationship with chromatin structure and cancer. FEBS Lett 574, 1–8 (2004). [PubMed]
  • Pender C. et al. Muscle insulin receptor concentrations in obese patients post bariatric surgery: relationship to hyperinsulinemia. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 28, 363–369 (2004). [PubMed]
  • Brunetti A., Maddux B. A., Wong K. Y. & Goldfine I. D. Muscle cell differentiation is associated with increased insulin receptor biosynthesis and messenger RNA levels. J. Clin. Invest. 83, 192–198 (1989). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brunetti A., Foti D. & Goldfine I. D. Identification of unique nuclear regulatory proteins for the insulin receptor gene, which appear during myocyte and adipocyte differentiation. J. Clin. Invest. 92, 1288–1295 (1993). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Goldfine I. D. The insulin receptor: molecular biology and transmembrane signalling. Endocr. Rev. 8, 235–255 (1987). [PubMed]
  • Kahn C. R. The molecular mechanisms of insulin action. Annu. Rev. Med. 36, 429–451 (1985). [PubMed]
  • Czech M. P. The nature and regulation of insulin receptor: structure and function. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 47, 357–381 (1985). [PubMed]
  • Lewitt M. S., Denyer G. S., Cooney G. J. & Baxter R. C. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 modulates blood glucose levels. Endocrinology 129, 2254–2256 (1991). [PubMed]
  • Rajkumar K., Krsek M., Dheen S. T. & Murphy L. J. Impaired glucose homeostasis in insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 transgenic mice. J. Clin. Invest. 98, 1818–1825 (1996). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chiefari E. et al. The cAMP-HMGA1-RBP4 system: a novel biochemical pathway for modulating glucose homeostasis. BMC Biol. 7, 24 (2009). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dey D. et al. Inhibition of insulin receptor gene expression and insulin signaling by fatty acid: interplay of PKC isoforms therein. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 16, 217–228 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Chiefari E. et al. Functional variants of the HMGA1 gene and type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 305, 903–912 (2011). [PubMed]
  • Chiefari E. et al. Pseudogene-mediated posttranscriptional silencing of HMGA1 can result in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nat. Commun. 1, 40 (2010). 10.1038/ncomms1040. [PubMed]
  • Desvergne B., Michalik L. & Wahli W. Transcriptional regulation of metabolism. Physiol. Rev. 86, 465–514 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Czech M. P. Insulin's expanding control of forkheads. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 11198–11200 (2003). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Puig O. & Tjian R. Transcriptional feedback control of insulin receptor by dFOXO/FOXO1. Genes Dev. 19, 2435–2446 (2005). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Paonessa F. et al. Activator protein-2 overexpression accounts for increased insulin receptor expression in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 66, 5085–5093 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Vitvitsky V. et al. Perturbations in homocysteine-linked redox homeostasis in a murine model for hyperhomocysteinemia. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 287, R39–R46 (2004). [PubMed]
  • Gerrish K., Cissell M. A. & Stein R. The role of hepatic nuclear factor 1a and PDX-1 in transcriptional regulation of the pdx-1 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 47775–47784 (2001). [PubMed]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...