• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2012; 7(1): e29669.
Published online Jan 3, 2012. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0029669
PMCID: PMC3250470

Cloning and Characterization of Maize miRNAs Involved in Responses to Nitrogen Deficiency

Sebastien Pfeffer, Editor

Abstract

Although recent studies indicated that miRNAs regulate plant adaptive responses to nutrient deprivation, the functional significance of miRNAs in adaptive responses to nitrogen (N) limitation remains to be explored. To elucidate the molecular biology underlying N sensing/signaling in maize, we constructed four small RNA libraries and one degradome from maize seedlings exposed to N deficiency. We discovered a total of 99 absolutely new loci belonging to 47 miRNA families by small RNA deep sequencing and degradome sequencing, as well as 9 new loci were the paralogs of previously reported miR169, miR171, and miR398, significantly expanding the reported 150 high confidence genes within 26 miRNA families in maize. Bioinformatic and subsequent small RNA northern blot analysis identified eight miRNA families (five conserved and three newly identified) differentially expressed under the N-deficient condition. Predicted and degradome-validated targets of the newly identified miRNAs suggest their involvement in a broad range of cellular responses and metabolic processes. Because maize is not only an important crop but is also a genetic model for basic biological research, our research contributes to the understanding of the regulatory roles of miRNAs in plant adaption to N-deficiency stress.

Introduction

As the key component of many macromolecules, including proteins and nucleic acids, nitrogen (N) is essential for the normal growth and development of plants. Because an insufficient N supply in soil can limit crop productivity, substantial research has been directed at improving the N-use efficiency by plants. The morphological, physiological, and biochemical adaptations to the variations of N availability in soils are at least partially dependent on changes in gene expression [1]. Several global expression profiling analyses have revealed that N-responsive genes are involved in a wide range of processes, such as primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cytokinin translocation and signaling, auxin transport and signaling, and transcription regulation [2], [3]. AtANR1 was the first transcription factor identified that controlled nutrient-induced changes in root architecture [4]. Other transcription factors involved in an N-stress responsive pathway contained GNC (GATA, nitrate-inducible, carbon metabolism-involved), DOF1 (DNA binding with one finger), and CCA1 (Circadian Clock Associated 1) [5][7]. Despite this substantial progress, the molecular basis underlying N sensing/signaling remains incompletely understood.

In recent years, small regulatory RNAs have attracted attention because of their important roles in posttranscriptional or translational gene regulation [8][12]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are the two major groups of small RNAs in plants that serve as negative regulators of gene expression. miRNAs are processed from hairpin precursors by the ribonuclease III-like enzyme Dicer Dicer-like1 (DCL1) or DCL4. Unlike miRNAs, siRNAs are generated from perfectly complementary, long, double-stranded RNAs by RNA -dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6)/RDR2. Plant miRNAs regulate a broad range of physiological processes, such as flowering time [13], leaf morphogenesis [14], nodule development [15], and adaption to abiotic stresses [16], [17].

Recent findings have also revealed the important roles of plant miRNAs in nutrient deficiency. For example, miR395 regulates sulfur assimilation and translocation by adjusting the mRNA levels of ATP sulfurylase and a low affinity sulfur transporter [18], [19]. miR399 regulates phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis through the suppression of a ubiquitin-conjugating E2 enzyme, PHO2 [20], [21]. miRNAs might also play a role in plant responses to N stresses. Gifford et al. reported that miR167 in pericycle cells mediated lateral root initiation and growth in response to nitrate [22]. By analysis of primary transcripts of known miRNAs, several N-responsive miRNAs in Arabidopsis were found and their abundances were strongly dependent on P or N status in the phloem sap of rapeseed (Brassica napus), suggesting that these miRNAs might act as systemic signals [23]. Our results also showed that miR169 was strongly down-regulated by N starvation, and transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing MIR169a accumulated less N and were more sensitive to N stress than the wild type [24].

As an important model system for basic biological research, maize has contributed significantly to our knowledge of plant development and evolution, and this understanding has been used to elucidate the regulatory functions of miRNAs [25]. The total number of miRNAs in an individual organism was estimated to represent ~1% of the total number of coding genes [16], [26]. Gene content in the maize B73 whole genome assembly was estimated at between ~37,000 and ~39,000. So far, only 150 high-confidence genes within 26 miRNA families have been reported in maize [25], and the number of miRNAs identified in maize was far from saturation. The two main approaches to identify new miRNAs have been advanced high-throughput sequencing technologies and bioinformatic analysis. Bioinformatic analysis based on sequence similarity effectively predicted conserved miRNAs among different species independent of their abundance or spatial/temporal expression patterns [18]. However, many miRNAs are species-specific and have evolved only recently. Advanced high-throughput sequencing technologies has revealed non-conserved miRNAs in various plant species [16], [27][31]. Because the methods are reproducible, advanced high-throughput sequencing technologies were also used to analyze small RNA profiles, in which the normalized small RNA reads from different tissues or developmental stages were compared [32], [33].

In the present research, we aimed to identify new miRNAs and discover N-deficiency regulated miRNAs in maize by using a deep sequencing approach. We constructed not only four small RNA libraries from N-deficient and control maize seedlings, but also a degradome from N-deficient roots. Through library sequencing and analysis, we discovered a total of 99 absolutely new loci belonging to 47 miRNA families by small RNA deep sequencing and degradome sequencing, as well as 9 new loci were the paralogs of previously reported miR169, miR171, and miR398. The results of small RNA northern blot analyses showed that the expressions of miR169s, miR395s, miR528s, miR827s, miRC1, miR169w, miR171p/q, miRC19 and miRC37 were downregulated or upregulated by N limitation. Our results contribute to the understanding of the regulatory roles of miRNAs in plant adaption to N- deficiency.

Results

Analysis of small RNA library data sets in response to N deficiency

For identification of miRNAs and other endogenous small RNAs in response to N deficiency, four small RNA libraries from N-sufficient roots (R+N), N-deficient roots (R−N), N-sufficient shoots (S+N), and N-deficient shoots (S−N) were generated and sequenced by Solexa high-throughput sequencing technology. These four small RNA libraries yielded a total of more than 35 million raw reads, and approximately 90% of the raw reads remained after 3′ adaptor trimming (Table S1). Of these, more than 24 million reads could be perfectly mapped to maize B73 RefGen_V2 (http://archive.maizesequence.org/index.html). Sequences that could not be mapped to the maize genome were discarded, and only those perfectly mapped were analyzed further. The genome-matched sequences were classed into several RNA groups, including known miRNA, rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA and others (Table S2). The known miRNAs accounted for 27.9, 46.4, 28.7, and 33.9% of the small RNA libraries for S+N, S−N, R+N, and R−N, respectively. However, the known miRNAs represented only ~0.1% of the total number of unique sequences in the shoot small RNA libraries, and even a lower percentage of the unique sequences in the root small RNA libraries (0.08% for R+N small RNA library, 0.05% for R−N small RNA library). The highest proportion of unique sequences was unclassified small RNA sequences, which might include novel miRNA candidates.

The cloning frequency of different sized small RNAs (16–26 nt) was similar between S+N and S–N libraries. Consistent with the previous report by Pantaleo et al. [34], 21-nt small RNAs in total sequence reads in S+N, S–N, and R+N libraries were dominant (Figure 1A). In contrast, two major peaks at 24 nt and 22 nt were observed in the R−N library (Figure 1A). When the unique sequence signatures were examined, the 24- and 22- nt class of small RNAs were most abundant, and most of them appeared only once in corresponding small RNA library data sets (Figure 1B), suggesting that they are diverse in maize.

Figure 1
Size distribution of redundant (A) and unique (B) small RNA sequences.

Identification of novel miRNAs from N-deficient maize by small RNA library sequencing

Confident annotation of novel species-specific miRNAs requires dcl1 or dcl4 knockout mutants [35], [36]. In the absence of these mutants, one of the most important criteria is the sequencing of miRNA* [37]. Although 953 novel loci with miRNA precursor-like stem-loop structures were found in our small RNA library data sets, only 102 loci belonging to 46 miRNA families were annotated as completely new miRNAs based on the criteria (Table S3). Many of newly identified miRNAs contained 21–22 nt and 17 of the 46 novel miRNA families began with a 5′ uridine. Twenty of these candidate miRNAs had different independent genomic locations (e.g. miRC34 had 13 different genomic loci), and others had a unique genomic location. The folding free energies ranged from −21.6 to −128.54 kcal mol−1 with an average of −64.10 kcalmol−1; this average was similar to the −72.4 kcal mol−1 in wheat and −71.0 kcal mol−1 in rice, and was much lower than that of tRNA and rRNA [38]. In maize, a subset of miRNAs was organized as compact clusters, with fewer than 2000 nt separating adjacent genes [25]. In the present research, all the novel MIRs we have identified existed as tandem paralog clusters (Table S3).

Among the novel miRNAs, four families belonged to known miRNAs based on their homology with known miRNAs or miRNA precursors reported in maize or other plant species. miRC8, which had two independent genomic loci in maize, and miRC31 were the homologues of zma-miR171. miRC16, miRC27 (three different genomic loci), and miRC24 were the orthologs of zma-miR169 and zma-miR398, respectively. Thus, we re-designated them as zma-miR171o, zma-miR171p, zma-miR171q, zma-miR169s, zma-miR169t, zma-miR169u, zma-miR169v, and zma-miR398c. The other novel miRNAs were not found in other plant species, indicating that they are maize-specific. The non-conserved miRNAs were usually expressed at a low level. Although miRC37 was abundant in the S−N library, the sequence reads of most of the novel miRNAs in the four libraries were under 100 TPQ (Table S4). miRC8 was abundantly expressed in maize shoots, while miRC4 showed elevated expression in roots. miRC34, miRC35, miRC36, miRC37, and miRC38 were only observed in the S−N library, whereas miRC42, miRC43, miRC44, miRC45, and miRC46 were distinctly abundant in N-limited root (Table S4), suggesting that the expression patterns of novel miRNAs were tissue-specific or stress-regulated. To further demonstrate that the novel miRNAs were authentic, we chose candidate miRNA sequences with at least five reads for small RNA northern blot analysis and a total of 15 probes (six from shoots, one from roots, and eight from both shoots and roots) were selected. Except miRC4, miRC23, and miRC26 from roots, miRNAs with around 21 nt could be clearly detected using small RNA blot analysis (Figure 2A), further demonstrating the authenticity of the novel miRNAs that we identified in our four libraries.

Figure 2
Detection of novel miRNA candidate identified by small RNA library (A) or degradome (B) sequencing.

Identification of novel miRNAs from N-deficient maize roots by degradome sequencing

The abundance of miRNA* is usually low. Even for conserved miRNAs, the miRNA* could not be detected by small RNA deep sequencing sometimes; this was the case with miR394 in the current research (data not shown). To continue with the identification of the potentially novel miRNAs, we constructed a degradome using total RNA from R−N for parallel analysis of RNA ends (PARE), which can be used to predict novel miRNAs that mediate mRNA cleavage [39]. We obtained a total of 15,328,555 reads, corresponding to 30,638 unique sequences perfectly matching the maize genome. Based primarily on the secondary structures of the miRNA candidates and their abundances in the R−N library, we identified six other novel loci belonging to five families (Table 1). Four of the five novel miRNA families began with a 5′ uridine. The folding free energies ranged from −41.2 to −96.0 kcal mol−1 with an average of −65.49 kcal mol−1. Among the novel miRNAs, miRC47 was the homologue of zma-miR169 and re-designated as zma-miR169w. The newly identified zma-miR169w was much more abundant than the conserved zma-miR169, whereas the abundances of miRC48–51 were relative low (Table S4). Thus, we selected zma-miR169w and miRC50, whose abundances were relatively high, for small RNA northern blot analysis; and we clearly detected the expression of zma-miR169w, but not of miRC50 (Figure 2B).

Table 1
Sequences of novel miRNAs identified by the degradome sequencing in maize.

Expression profiling of conserved miRNAs in response to N limitation

Computational approaches based on homology and secondary structure have identified 150 genes within 26 miRNA families in maize [25]. Except for zamiR482, all of the other 25 annotated miRNA families were detected in our small RNA library data sets (Table S5). Twenty-eight and 49 conserved miRNAs with > 2-fold relative change were identified in shoots and roots, respectively, based on the difference in numbers of normalized sequence reads between N deficient and N sufficient tissues (Figure 3A and B). The downregulation of miR169 caused by N deficiency in both shoots and roots agreed with our previous reports on Arabidopsis (Figure 3A and B), indicating the reliability of our sequencing data. In shoots, the expression of MIR162, MIR167s, and MIR394s was upregulated by N deficiency, whereas the expression of MIR169s, MIR397s, MIR398s, MIR408s, and MIR528s was significantly downregulated by N deficiency (Figure 3A). MIR162 and MIR167s were also upregulated by N deficiency in roots, and the expressions of MIR169s, MIR397s, MIR408s, MIR528s, MIR395s, and MIR827 were clearly decreased in N -deficient roots (Figure 3B).

Figure 3
Differential expression of conserved miRNAs in response to N deficiency in shoots (A) and roots (B).

Because of the importance of roots in the sensing and uptake of nutrients, we selected MIR169c/r, MIR395a/b/d/e/f/g/h/i/j/n/p, MIR528a/b, and MIR827 for further validation by Real-time RT PCR or small RNA northern analysis (Figure 3C and D). The expression of MIR169a/b, MIR395a/b/d/e/f/g/h/i/j/n/p, and MIR827 was substantially suppressed by N deficiency, which was consistent with the sequencing data. The only exception was MIR528a/b, whose expression was upregulated by N deficiency in the northern blot analysis but downregulated in the sequencing data.

Discovery of novel N-responsive miRNAs

The newly identified zma-miR169s, zma-miR169t, zma-miR169u, and zma-miR169v (identified by small RNA deep sequencing) and zma-miR169w (identified by degradome) were also downregulated in both shoots and roots by N deficiency (Table S4), which was consistent with the conserved zma-miR169, suggesting again the reliability of the sequencing data. To improve accuracy, we selected only the newly identified miRNAs with sequence reads over five TPQ in at least one library for further analysis. Twenty-one miRNAs in eight families in shoots and seven miRNAs in six families in roots with > 2-fold relative change were identified (Figure 4A and B). The expression of the novel miRNAs with greater than 4-fold relative change and miR169w was validated by small RNA northern blots. Seven families of 11 novel N-responsive miRNAs, including miRC1, miRC11, miR171p/q, miRC16, miRC19, miRC37 and miR169w, were selected (Figure 4C). miR171p/q and miR169w exhibited an expression pattern perfectly matching the sequence frequency in the libraries. miRC19 and miRC37 were slightly upregulated, and miRC1 was significantly downregulated by N deficiency. The discrepancy between northern blot analysis and sequencing data might be due to the insufficient sequence reads of the newly identified miRNAs, which has been also reported by Li et al. [40], or normalization in this case could not be simply done by adjusting reads to TPQ.

Figure 4
Differential expression of newly identified miRNAs in response to N deficiency in shoots (A) and roots (B).

Prediction and validation of targets of newly identified miRNAs

To predict the potential targets of the novel identified miRNAs, we searched the Filtered Gene Set transcripts (Release 4a.53) of the B73 maize genome sequenced for maize mRNAs with sequence complementarity to the miRNAs according to the procedure and criteria described by Allen et al. [41] and Schwab et al. [42]; we also searched the results of the degradome sequencing for targets. For the potential targets of novel miRNAs identified by small RNA deep sequencing, the mispair score and minimum free energy (MFE) ratio limits to ≤4 and ≥0.70 were applied. Our analysis predicted 80 unique potential genes targeted by 31 miRNA sequences belonging to 20 families (Table S6). We also detected 28 unique targets for novel miRNAs identified by the degradome (Table 2). That the others lacked predicted targets might be due to the recent development/appearance of these miRNAs or to unannotated mRNAs in the maize genome.

Table 2
Predicted targets of novel miRNAs identified by the degradome sequencing in maize.

In agreement with previous reports for Arabidopsis [16], [43], our predicted target sites fell in the open reading frames (ORFs). Interestingly, three miRNAs (miRC11, miRC37, and miRC42) had been predicted to target the ORFs of GRMZM2G030823_T01, GRMZM2G030823_T02 and GRMZM2G030823_T03. Unlike the conserved miRNAs whose targets showed a strong preference for transcription factor activity or transcription regulatory activity [25], most of the newly identified miRNAs were predicted to target mRNAs encoding important enzymes including protein kinases, zinc finger family protein, and oxidoreductase (Table 2 and Table S6). To further understand the function of the predicted novel miRNA target genes, we investigated target enrichment in Gene Ontology [44]. The newly identified targets were enriched in binding activity, signal transducer activity, transmembrane transporter activity, and kinase activity (data not shown), indicating that these novel miRNAs might play an important role in metabolic processes and signaling transduction pathways.

To verify targets of the miRNAs that were newly identified by small RNA sequencing, we used the high-throughput degradome sequencing approach and the total RNA from N-deficient root. For conserved miRNAs, we identified a total of 72 target mRNAs that had at least one degradome tag matching the corresponding cleavage sits, for MIR166a/b/c/d/g/h/I, MIR169s, MIR172b/c/d, MIR395s, MIR408, and MIR408b (data not shown). We also detected the potential targets of miR164f*, miR167g*/h*/i*, miR169r*, miR168a*/b* and miR827* by the degradome (Table 3), suggesting that miRNA* also mediated mRNA cleavage. For the novel miRNAs (MIR169w, MIRC48, MIRC49, MIRC50, and MIRC51) identified by the degradome, we plotted the abundance of each signature as a function of its position in the transcript targets as described by German et al. [39]. Only the two targets of zma-miR169s were detected (Figure 5A). The low identification frequency might be due to the low abundance of these miRNA and/or the different spatial distribution (miRC27–28 were only detected in the N-sufficient condition; miRC34–38 and miR39–41 were found only in the S−N library and the R+N library, respectively).

Figure 5
Target plots of validated miRNA targets.
Table 3
miRNA* mediated mRNA cleavage detected by degradome sequencing in maize.

The gene GRMZM2G006953, encoding a putative nuclear transport factor 2, was predicted to be a target of miRC49. To further confirm the targets solely proven by their target plots, the cleavage of the mRNA of GRMZM2G006953 was confirmed by 5′ RACE using RNA from N-deficient roots (Figure 5B). The cleavage of GRMZM2G053779, a target of miR408 (conserved miRNA) was also experimentally validated by 5′ RACE (data not shown). The mapped cleavage sites of both conserved and novel mirNAs were in agree with those identified by degradome, indicating the reliability of degradome sequencing data.

Discussion

To obtain high crop yields, farmers have greatly increased the application of N fertilizer, which has resulted in the severe environmental degradation [45]. Recently, substantial research has been directed at improving the N-use efficiency of plants, and our previous results clearly demonstrated that miR169 was involved in N-deficiency responses in Arabidopsis [24]. This motivated us to identify N-responsive miRNAs. Pant et al. detected some N status-responsive pri-miR species by a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction platform [23]; however, the data came from dicotyledon, Arabidopsis, and this technology could not find non-conserved miRNAs. The present study focused on maize, a valuable graminaceous monocot that provides feed, fodder, and biofuel. By deep sequencing four small RNA libraries and one degradome from maize seedlings exposed to N deficiency, we were able to add 47 new miRNA families to the previously published 26 families in maize. In addition, we identified three, five, and one new member for the families of miR171, miR169, and miR398, respectively (Table 1 and Table S3).

The detection of miRNA* has been considered one of the most important criteria for miRNA identification. In the miRNA/miRNA* duplex, the mature miRNA is selected to load into AGO protein and miRNA* is degraded. Thus, the abundance of miRNA* is rather low. In our deep sequencing data, several miRNA* (miR159d*, miR169m*, miR171h*/k*, miR319b*/d* and miR395o*) showed a greater number of normalized small RNA reads than the corresponding mature miRNA, and we even validated the potential targets of miR164f*, miR167g*/h*/i*, miR169r*, miR168a*/b* and miR827* by the degradome (Table 3), in line with previous findings from vertebrate [46] and Medicago truncatula [47]. These results suggested that these miRNAs* might be the authentic miRNAs, or both these miRNAs and corresponding miRNAs* could play important roles in gene expression regulation.

We also discovered several miRNAs that were either downregulated or upregulated by N limitation, including the conserved miR169s, miR395s, miR528s, and miR827 and the newly identified miRC1, miR169w, miRC19, miRC37 and miR171p/q. As illustrated in Figure 6, the expression of miR169, miR395, miR827 and miRC1 was down-regulated by N-limitation and formed the first subgroup. In Medicago truncatula, miR169 is the key regulator for the differentiation of nodule primoridia [15]. Our previous research also showed that miR169 affected drought-resistance and N-limitation responses in Arabidopsis via inhibition of its targets, HAP2 transcription factors [17], [24]. Contrary to the low abundance of newly identified miRNAs, zm-miR169w was much more abundant than the conserved zma-miR169, indicating the important roles of zma-miR169w in various developmental processes or responses to abiotic stresses as is the case for other orthologs. miR827 is another miRNA that attracted our attention. The target genes of miR827 encoded SPX domain-containing proteins. One of its targets, NITROGEN LIMITATION ADAPTATION (NLA), is involved in adaptive responses to low N conditions in Arabidopsis [48]. Though recent evidence showed that miR827 took part in maintaining nitrate-dependent phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis [49], the function of miR827 in plant adaption to N limitation requires further research. miR395 was reported to function in regulating sulfur assimilation and translocation [50], [51], and the downregulation of miR395 indicated cross talk among different nutrient-deficient responses.

Figure 6
A possible functional network of N-limitation responsive miRNAs in maize seedlings.

The second group consisted of 4 N-limitation downregulated miRNAs including miR171, miR528, miRC19 and miRC37. miR171 was predicted to GRAS family transcription factor-containing protein and the plant-specific GRAS gene family is essential for the activation of stress-inducible promoters [52]. The predicted targets of miR528 and miRC19 were involved signal transduction pathways. Recently, NLP7 (nodule inception-like protein) was reported to be a positive regulator of the primary nitrate response [53]; CHL1 (Nitrate Transporter AtNRT1.1) was assumed to utilize dual-affinity binding and a phosphorylation switch to sense a wide range of nitrate concentrations in the soil [54]; NRT2.1, a high-affinity nitrate transporter, might be the dominant nitrate sensor under nitrogen limited conditions [55]. However, a detailed understanding of the molecular basis underlying N sensing/signaling is still lacking. miR528 and miRC19 might shed another light on understanding the molecular basis underlying N sensing/signaling.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Plants of inbred Zea mays B73 were grown hydroponically in a growth chamber with a light intensity of 300 µmol·m−2·s−1, 60–70% relative humidity, and 28/22°C day/night temperature regime. Seeds of uniform size were surface sterilized in 10% H2O2 for 20 min and then germinated in coarse quartz sand at room temperature. The seedlings were then transferred to 2-L pots supplied with modified half-strength Hoagland's nutrient solution for 3 days and then supplied with full-strength Hoagland's nutrient solution. The basic nutrients in hydroponic solutions consisted of 0.75 mM K2SO4, 0.65 mM MgSO4·7H2O, 0.25 mM KH2PO4, 0.1 mM KCl, 2 mM Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, 0.1 mM Fe-EDTA, 0.01 mM H3BO3, 1 µM MnSO4·H2O, 1 µM ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.5 µM CuSO4·5H2O, and 0.005 µM (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O. The nutrient solution was replaced with fresh solution every 2 days. After they had grown for 2 weeks, seedlings were supplied with N-free nutrient solutions for 2 days to generate N-deficiency conditions. Nutrient solutions were renewed daily to ensure pH stability. Each treatment was replicated for three times. Shoots and roots were harvested separately, flash frozen and stored at −80°C.

Small RNA isolation, library construction and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from shoots and roots with TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen). For enrichment of small RNAs, high molecular weight RNA was selectively precipitated by the addition of one volume of 20% PEG/1M NaCl [56]. The miRNAs were cloned as described by Sunkar & Zhu [16] with some modifications. In brief, low molecular weight RNA was fractioned on 17% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. Small RNAs in the range of 16–30 nt were excised and eluted with 0.3 M NaCl. The RNA was dephosphorylated and ligated sequentially to 5′ and 3′ RNA/DNA chimeric oligonucletide adaptors. Reverse transcription PCR was carried out and the resulting PCR products were sequenced using Solexa sequencing technology (LC Sciences, Hangzhou, China).

Analysis of sequencing data

The raw reads were produced after excluding low quantity reads, and 5′ and 3′ adaptor contaminants. The identical adaptor-trimmed sequences in the range of 16–30 nt were grouped as unique sequences with normalized counts for the individual sequence reads. The unique small RNAs were aligned to the maize B73 RefGen_V2 genome (http://archive.maizesequence.org/index.html). Only perfectly matching sequences were considered for further analysis. Known non-coding RNAs derived from rRNAs, tRNAs, snRNAs and snoRNAs were identified by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BLASTN. The resulting small RNAs were mapped to the reported miRNAs from miRBase (miRBase15.0, http://www.mirbase.org/). These sequences were then clustered to generate the listed miRNA families. A unique sequence was identified as a new miRNA if it met the following criteria: the fold-back structures formed hairpins as predicted using RNAFOLD program [57]; the sequence was located in the duplex region of the hairpin structure [58]; and the corresponding miRNA* could be detected in the small RNA libraries [37]. For prediction of miRNA target genes, the procedure and criteria were followed as described by Allen et al. [41] and Schwab et al. [42].

RNA analysis

Low molecular weight RNA was separated from total RNA by PEG precipitation. Small RNA (40 µg per lane) was loaded and the blots were probed and washed as previously reported [17]. The probes used were listed in Table S7.

For real-time RT-PCR, 5 µg of total RNA isolated with the RNeasy plant mini kit was used for the first-strand cDNA synthesis using SuperScript III first-strand synthesis supermix (Invitrogen). The cDNA reaction mixture was diluted three times, and 1 µL was used as template in a 25-µL PCR reaction. PCR was performed after a preincubation at 95°C for 3 min and was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 60°C for 40 s, and extension at 72°C for 40 s. All the reactions were performed in the iQ5 real-time PCR detection system using iQ SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad). Primers specific for MIR169C/R were used to detect expression levels of miR169c/r. Each experiment was replicated three times. The comparative Ct method was applied.

5′ RACE

To obtain cleavage fragments resulting from transcript processing by microRNAs, 5′ RACE System for Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends, Version 2.0 (Invitrogen) was used. Total RNA was extracted from N-deficient roots by the TRIZOL method described above. The oligo dT was then used for cDNA synthesis. Initial PCR was carried out using the 5′ RACE Abridged Primer and gene specific outer primer. Nested PCR was carried out using the 1/100 of the initial PCR reaction, Universal Amplification Primer and gene specific inner primer. The gene specific primers were listed in Table S7.

Degradome library construction and data analysis

A degradome library was constructed for hydroponically grown 2-week-old maize roots that had been subjected to N stress for 2 d as described by German et al. [39] and Addo-Quaye et al. [40] with some modifications. In brief, 1 mg of polyA-enriched RNA was ligated to a 5′ RNA adaptor with a Mmel site, followed by reverse transcription PCR (five cycles), Mmel digestion, PAGE-gel purification, ligation of 3′-double strand DNA adaptor, PAGE-gel purification, PCR amplication (21 cycles), and PAGE-gel purification. The purified cDNA library was sequenced with a Solaxa/Illumina genome analyzer (LC Sciences, Hangzhou, China). A public software package, CleaveLand, was used for analyzing sequencing data Addo-Quaye et al. [59], [60].

Supporting Information

Table S1

Summary statistics of small RNA sequences from maize shoots and roots with/without N.

(PPT)

Table S2

Different categories of small RNAs by deep sequencing.

(PPT)

Table S3

Sequences of novel miRNAs identified by small RNA deep sequencing in maize.

(PPT)

Table S4

Expression profiles of new miRNAs identified by small RNA library sequencing and degradome sequencing.

(PPT)

Table S5

Normalized abundance of known-miRNAs in response to N deficiency.

(XLS)

Table S6

Predicted targets of novel miRNAs identified by small RNA deep sequencing in maize.

(PPT)

Table S7

Probes and primers used in this study.

(PPT)

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant number 30970221, 31071139), the Ministry of Agriculture of China for transgenic research (Grant number 2009ZX08009-131B) to W-XL, and the Innovation Fund for Graduate Student of China Agricultural University to MZ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Vidal E, Gutiérrez RA. A systems view of nitrogen nutrient and metabolite responses in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008;11:521–529. [PubMed]
2. Scheible WR, Morcuende R, Czechowski T, Fritz C, Osuna D, et al. Genome-wide reprogramming of primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular growth processes, and the regulatory infrastructure of Arabidopsis in response to nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2483–2499. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Wang R, Okamoto M, Xing X, Crawford NM. Microarray analysis of the nitrate response in Arabidopsis roots and shoots reveals over 1,000 rapidly responding genes and new linkages to glucose, trehalose-6-phosphate, iron, and sulfate metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2003;132:556–567. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Zhang H, Forde BG. An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. Science. 1998;279:407–409. [PubMed]
5. Bi YM, Zhang Y, Signorelli T, Zhao R, Zhu T, et al. Genetic analysis of Arabidopsis GATA transcription factor gene family reveals a nitrate-inducible member important for chlorophyll synthesis and glucose sensitivity. Plant J. 2005;44:680–692. [PubMed]
6. Yanagisawa S, Akiyama A, Kisaka H, Uchimiya H, Miwa T. Metabolic engineering with Dof1 transcription factor in plants: improved nitrogen assimilation and growth under low-nitrogen conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:7833–7838. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Gutiérrez RA, Stokes TL, Thum K, Xu X, Obertello M, et al. Systems approach identifies an organic nitrogen-responsive gene network that is regulated by the master clock control gene CCA1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:4939–4944. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Hamilton AJ, Baulcombe DC. A species of small antisense RNA in posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants. Science. 1999;286:950–952. [PubMed]
9. Carrington JC, Ambros V. Role of microRNAs in plant and animal development. Science. 2003;301:336–338. [PubMed]
10. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. [PubMed]
11. Brodersen P, Sakvarelidze-Achard L, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Dunoyer P, Yamamoto YY, et al. Widespread translational inhibition by plant miRNAs and siRNAs. Science. 2008;320:1185–1190. [PubMed]
12. Lanet E, Delannoy E, Sormani R, Floris M, Brodersen P, et al. Biochemical evidence for translational repression by Arabidopsis microRNAs. Plant Cell. 2009;21:1762–1768. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Aukerman MJ, Sakai H. Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2730–2741. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Palatnik JF, Allen E, Wu X, Schommer C, Schwab R, et al. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature. 2003;425:257–263. [PubMed]
15. Combier JP, Frugier F, Billy F, Billy FD, Boualem A, et al. MtHAP2-1 is a key transcriptional regulator of symbiotic nodule development regulated by microRNA169 in Medicago truncatula. Gene Dev. 2006;20:3084–3088. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Sunkar R, Zhu JK. Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:2001–2019. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Li WX, Oono Y, Zhu J, He XJ, Wu JM, et al. The Arabidopsis NFYA5 transcription factor is regulated transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally to promote drought resistance. Plant Cell. 2008;20:2238–2251. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP. Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress induced miRNA. Mol Cell. 2004;14:787–799. [PubMed]
19. Kawashima CG, Yoshimoto N, Maruyama-Nakashita A, Tsuchiya YN, Saito K, et al. Sulphur starvation induces the expression of microRNA-395 and one of its target genes but in different cell types. Plant J. 2009;57:313–321. [PubMed]
20. Fujii H, Chiou TJ, Lin SI, Aung K, Zhu JK. A miRNA involved in phosphate-starvation response in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2005;15:2038–2043. [PubMed]
21. Chiou TJ, Aung K, Lin SI, Wu CC, Chiang SF, et al. Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by microRNA in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18:412–421. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Gifford ML, Dean A, Gutierrez RA, Coruzzi GM, Birnbaum KD. Cell-specific nitrogen responses mediate developmental plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:803–808. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Pant BD, Musialak-Lange M, Nuc P, May P, Buhtz A, et al. Identification of nutrient-responsive Arabidopsis and rapeseed microRNAs by comprehensive real-time polymerase chain reaction profiling and small RNA sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:1541–1555. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Zhao M, Ding H, Zhu JK, Zhang F, Li WX. Involvement of miR169 in the nitrogen-starvation responses in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2011;190:906–915. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Zhang L, Chia JM, Kumari S, Stein JC, Liu Z, et al. A genome-wide characterization of microRNA genes in maize. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000716. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Grad Y, Aach J, Hayes GD, Reinhart BJ, Church GM, et al. Computational and experimental identification of C. elegans microRNAs. Mol Cell. 2003;11:1253–1263. [PubMed]
27. Szittya G, Moxon S, Santos DM, Jing R, Fevereiro MP, et al. High-throughput sequencing of Medicago truncatula short RNAs identifies eight new miRNA families. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:593. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Yao Y, Guo G, Ni Z, Sunkar R, Du J, et al. Cloning and characterization of microRNAs from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome Biol. 2007;8:R96. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Zhu QH, Spriggs A, Matthew L, Fan L, Kennedy G, et al. A diverse set of microRNAs and microRNA-like small RNAs in developing rice grains. Genome Res. 2008;18:1456–1465. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Moxon S, Jing R, Szittya G, Schwach F, Pilcher RL, et al. Deep sequencing of tomato short RNAs identifies microRNAs targeting genes involved in fruit ripening. Genome Res. 2008;18:1602–1609. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Klevebring D, Street NR, Fahlgren N, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC, et al. Genome-wide profiling of populus small RNAs. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:620. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Fahlgren N, Howell MD, Kasschau KD, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, et al. High-throughput sequencing of Arabidopsis microRNAs: evidence for frequent birth and death of MIRNA genes. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e219. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Mohorianu I, Schwach F, Jing R, Lopez-Gomollon S, Moxon S, et al. Profiling of short RNAs during fleshy fruit development reveals stage-specific sRNAome expression patterns. Plant J. 2011;67:232–246. [PubMed]
34. Pantaleo V, Szittya G, Moxon S, Miozzi L, Moulton V, et al. Identification of grapevine microRNAs and their targets using high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. Plant J. 2010;62:960–976. [PubMed]
35. Ambros V, Bartel B, Bartel DP, Burge CB, Carrington JC, et al. A uniform system for microRNA annotation. RNA. 2003;9:277–279. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Rajagopalan R, Vaucheret H, Trejo J, Bartel DP. A diverse and evolutionarily fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene Dev. 2006;20:3407–3425. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Meyers BC, Axtell MJ, Bartel B, Bartel DP, Baulcombe D, et al. Criteria for annotation of plant microRNAs. Plant Cell. 2008;20:3186–3190. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Yao Y, Guo G, Ni Z, Sunkar R, Du J, et al. Cloning and characterization of microRNAs from wheat (Triticum aestivem L.). Genome Biol. 2007;8:R96. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. German MA, Pillay M, Jeong DH, Hetawal A, Luo S, et al. Global identification of microRNA-target RNA pairs by parallel analysis of RNA ends. Nat Biotech. 2008;26:941–946. [PubMed]
40. Li T, Li H, Zhang YX, Liu JY. Identification and analysis of seven H2O2-responsive miRNAs and 32 new miRNAs in the seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. Indica). Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;39:2821–2833. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC. MicroRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005;121:207–221. [PubMed]
42. Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, et al. Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev Cell. 2005;8:517–527. [PubMed]
43. Rhoades M, Reinhart B, Lim L, Burge B, Bartel B, et al. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell. 2002;110:513–520. [PubMed]
44. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Ju XT, Xing GX, Chen XP, Zhang SL, Zhang LJ, et al. Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:3041–3046. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Yang JS, Phillips MD, Betel D, Mu P, Ventura A, et al. Widespread regulatory activity of vertebrate microRNA* species. RNA. 2011;17:312–326. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Devers EA, Branscheid A, May P, Krajinski F. Stars and symbiosis: microRNA- and microRNA*-mediated transcript cleavage involved in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 2011 DOI: 10.1104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Peng M, Hannam C, Gu HL, Bi YM, Rothstein SJ. A mutation in NLA, which encodes a RING-type ubiquitin ligase, disrupts the adaptability of Arabidopsis to nitrogen limitation. Plant J. 2007;50:320–337. [PubMed]
49. Kant S, Peng M, Rothstein SJ. Genetic regulation by NLA and microRNA827 for maintaining nitrate-dependent phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002021. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Liang G, Yang F, Yu D. MicroRNA395 mediates regulation of sulfate accumulation and allocation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2010;62:1046–1057. [PubMed]
51. Kawashima CG, Matthewman CA, Huang S, Lee BR, Yoshimoto N, et al. Interplay of SLIM1 and miR395 in the regulation of sulfate assimilation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2011;66:863–876. [PubMed]
52. Fode B, Siemsen T, Thurow C, Weigel R, Gatz C. The Arabidopsis GRAS protein SCL14 interacts with class II TGA transcription factors and is essential for the activation of stress-inducible promoters. Plant Cell. 2008;20:3122–3135. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Castaings L, Camargo A, Pocholle D, Gaudon V, Texier Y, et al. The nodule inception-like protein 7 modulates nitrate sensing and metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009;57:426–435. [PubMed]
54. Ho CH, Lin SH, Hu HC, Tsay YF. CHL1 function as a nitrate sensor in plants. Cell. 2009;138:1184–1194. [PubMed]
55. Ho CH, Tsay YF. Nitrate, ammonium, and potassium sensing and signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13:604–610. [PubMed]
56. Llave C, Xie Z, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC. Cleavage of scarecrow-like mRNA targets directed by a class of Arabidopsis miRNA. Science. 2002;297:2053–2056. [PubMed]
57. Hofacker IL. Vienna RNA secondary structure server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3429–3431. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Hsieh LC, Lin SI, Shih ACC, Chen JW, Lin WY, et al. Uncovering small RNA-mediated responses to phosphate deficiency in Arabidopsis by deep sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2009;151:2120–2132. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Addo-Quaye C, Eshoo TW, Bartel DP, Axtell MJ. Endogenous siRNA and miRNA targets identified by sequencing of the Arabidopsis degradome. Curr Biol. 2008;18:758–762. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Addo-Quaye C, Snyder JA, Park YB, Li YF, Sunkar R, et al. Sliced microRNA targets and precise loop-first processing of MIR319 hairpins revealed by analysis of the physcomitrella patens degradome. RNA. 2009;15:2112–2121. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links