• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of pnasPNASInfo for AuthorsSubscriptionsAboutThis Article
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar 1986; 83(5): 1388–1392.
PMCID: PMC323081

Alternative adaptations, speciation, and phylogeny (A Review)

Abstract

Alternative adaptations—different adaptive phenotypes maintained in the same life stage and the same population but not necessarily simultaneously expressed in the same individual—represent contrasting character sets produced by the same genome, in effect allowing a single species to occupy more than one sympatric niche. Such alternatives are particularly likely to give rise to novel adaptations because of selection for extreme dissimilarity between them and because established traits buffer populations against extinction while independently expressed alternatives evolve in new directions. Particular alternatives can be suddenly fixed in populations with little or no genetic change, leading to a period of rapid evolution (especially, of morphology) exaggerating the characteristics of the newly fixed form. This burst of change would facilitate rapid speciation and could produce “punctuated” patterns of evolution. Evidence from a wide variety of organisms shows that alternative phenotypes are exceedingly common in nature and that they are probably important in speciation and macroevolution. Although many of these ideas and observations have been noted piecemeal by previous authors, bringing them together demonstrates the probable importance of alternative adaptations in the origin of major evolutionary novelties and calls for a revision of current and traditional ideas about the role of behavior and ontogeny in the genesis of organic diversity.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.2M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Warner RR, Robertson DR, Leigh EG., Jr Sex change and sexual selection. Science. 1975 Nov 14;190(4215):633–638. [PubMed]
  • Mayr E. Behavior programs and evolutionary strategies. Am Sci. 1974 Nov-Dec;62(6):650–659. [PubMed]
  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. Theoretical genetics of Batesian mimicry I. single-locus models. J Theor Biol. 1975 Dec;55(2):283–303. [PubMed]
  • Tauber CA, Tauber MJ. A genetic model for sympatric speciation through habitat diversification and seasonal isolation. Nature. 1977 Aug 25;268(5622):702–705. [PubMed]
  • Alexander RD. Life cycle origins, speciation, and related phenomena in crickets. Q Rev Biol. 1968 Mar;43(1):1–41. [PubMed]
  • WILLIAMS JB. The dimorphism of Polystoma integerrimum (Frolich) Rudolphi and its bearing on relationships within the Polystomatidae. III. J Helminthol. 1961;35:181–202. [PubMed]
  • Wilbur HM, Collins JP. Ecological Aspects of Amphibian Metamorphosis: Nonnormal distributions of competitive ability reflect selection for facultative metamorphosis. Science. 1973 Dec 28;182(4119):1305–1314. [PubMed]
  • Stebbins GL, Ayala FJ. Is a new evolutionary synthesis necessary? Science. 1981 Aug 28;213(4511):967–971. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...