![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Electric Signaling and Pin2 Gene
Expression on Different Abiotic Stimuli Depend on a Distinct Threshold
Level of Endogenous Abscisic Acid in Several Abscisic Acid-Deficient
Tomato Mutants1 Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Karl Liebknechtstrasse 25, D-14476 Golm, Germany (O.H., L.W., J.F.) Universidad de Santiago, Casilla 40, Correo 33, Santiago, Chile (H.P.C.) Institut für Pflanzenbiochemie, Weinberg 3, 06120 Halle/Saale, Germany (C.W.) *Corresponding author; e-mail fisahn/at/mpimp-golm.mpg.de; fax
49–331–977–2301. Received June 8, 1998; Accepted October 14, 1998. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Experiments were performed on three
abscisic acid (ABA)-deficient tomato (Lycopersicon
esculentum Mill.) mutants, notabilis,
flacca, and sitiens, to investigate the
role of ABA and jasmonic acid (JA) in the generation of electrical
signals and Pin2 (proteinase
inhibitor II) gene expression. We selected
these mutants because they contain different levels of endogenous ABA.
ABA levels in the mutant sitiens were reduced to 8% of
the wild type, in notabilis they were reduced to 47%,
and in flacca they were reduced to 21%. In wild-type
and notabilis tomato plants the induction of
Pin2 gene expression could be elicited by heat
treatment, current application, or mechanical wounding. In
flacca and sitiens only heat stimulation
induced Pin2 gene expression. JA levels in
flacca and sitiens plants also
accumulated strongly upon heat stimulation but not upon mechanical
wounding or current application. Characteristic electrical signals
evolved in the wild type and in the notabilis and
flacca mutants consisting of a fast action potential and
a slow variation potential. However, in sitiens only
heat evoked electrical signals; mechanical wounding and current
application did not change the membrane potential. In addition,
exogenous application of ABA to wild-type tomato plants induced
transient changes in membrane potentials, indicating the involvement of
ABA in the generation of electrical signals. Our data strongly suggest
the presence of a minimum threshold value of ABA within the plant that
is essential for the early events in electrical signaling and mediation
of Pin2 gene expression upon wounding. In contrast,
heat-induced Pin2 gene expression and membrane potential
changes were not dependent on the ABA level but, rather, on the
accumulation of JA. The plant hormones ABA and JA play a predominant role in the
conversion of environmental signals into changes in plant gene
expression. An increase in endogenous ABA and JA levels precedes and is
involved in Pin2 (proteinase
inhibitor II) gene expression upon wounding
(Peña-Cortés et al., 1989, 1991, 1995, 1996; Farmer and
Ryan, 1992; Farmer et al., 1992). This increase in ABA and JA is not
restricted to the tissue damaged directly but can also be detected in
the nonwounded, systemically induced tissue
(Peña-Cortés et al., 1989; Peña-Cortés and
Willmitzer, 1995). The accumulation of ABA and JA have been described
for several plant species, including potato, tomato, and tobacco
(Sanchez-Serrano et al., 1991; Peña-Cortés and Willmitzer,
1995). Further evidence for the involvement of ABA and JA in wound-induced
Pin2 gene expression was provided by a series of experiments
in which potato plants were sprayed with ABA or JA and Pin2
mRNA accumulated in the absence of any wounding
(Peña-Cortés et al., 1989; Hildmann et al., 1992). Both
nonsprayed leaves and leaves that were sprayed directly showed
increased Pin2 mRNA levels with a pattern identical to the
one described for wounded plants (Peña-Cortés et al., 1988;
Peña-Cortés and Willmitzer, 1995). Conclusive evidence for
the involvement of ABA in wound-induced Pin2 activation was
obtained from mutants impaired in ABA biosynthesis. Consequently, wound
induction of Pin2 was not observed in the droopy
mutant of potato or the sitiens mutant of tomato
(Peña-Cortés et al., 1989). However, in these mutants
treatment with ABA caused a return of the accumulation of
Pin2 mRNA to levels normally found in wild-type plants upon
wounding (Peña-Cortés et al., 1991). Like wounding, the application of electrical current was able to
initiate ABA and JA accumulation in wild-type plants but not in
ABA-deficient plants (Herde et al., 1996). These results suggested
that, like wounding, electrical current requires the presence of ABA
for the induction of Pin2 gene expression (Herde et al.,
1996). In contrast to wounding and electrical current, burning of
leaves activated Pin2 gene expression in sitiens
mutants by directly triggering the biosynthesis of JA via an
alternative pathway that is independent of endogenous ABA levels (Herde
et al., 1996). To determine the endogenous levels of ABA that are sufficient to
mediate electrical current-, heat-, and wound- induced Pin2
gene expression via electrical signals, we used several tomato mutants
containing progressively reduced levels of ABA. The effects of these
attenuated ABA levels on JA content and membrane potentials and the
expression pattern of Pin2 genes were analyzed. Analysis of
JA content was conducted to confirm the existence of an alternative
pathway that is independent of endogenous ABA levels in the different
ABA-deficient mutants. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant Material and Growth Conditions Wild-type and the ABA-deficient mutants flacca,
notabilis, and sitiens (generously donated by Dr.
Maarten Koornneef, Wageningen, The Netherlands) of tomato
(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Moneymaker [MM]) were
grown in the greenhouse at 26°C day/20°C night temperatures, 70%
to 80% RH, and 14 h of light. Characterization of the mutants and
determination of the endogenous levels of ABA were published previously
(Taylor, 1987). Two weeks after germination, the mutants were wrapped
in plastic to provide 100% humidity. All measurements were performed
on 21- to 28-d-old plants at 100% humidity. Mechanical Wounding, Current Application, Heat Treatment, and
Elicitation by ABA Mechanical damage to plants was due to dialysis clamps applied as
described by Sanchez-Serrano et al. (1986). For current application a
direct-current power supply provided 10 V for 30 s, as described
by Herde et al. (1995). Current was supplied extracellularly through
Ag/AgCl surface electrodes. Heat treatment was performed on the tip of
a leaf. Approximately 1 cm2 was burned as
described by Malone and Stankovic (1991) and Herde et al. (1996). In all experiments stimuli were applied on leaf 4, which we refer to as
“local.” Leaf 2 is referred to as “systemic” (not treated).
Treatment of plants was at 4 pm; at 10 pm
tissue samples were taken for analysis of Pin2 gene
expression and ABA and JA contents. Application of ABA was via a microincision in the major vein of a leaf
2 cm from the point of measurement. Cutting was with a high-frequency
microcauter (hf SURG, Meyer-Haake, Oberursel, Germany), which provided
a surgical tip 1 μm in diameter. No alterations in the membrane
potential upon cutting could be detected. The experimental solution was
water buffered with Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, with a final concentration of
10 μm ABA. A drop containing 10 μL of this solution was
introduced in the microincisions. ABA and JA Quantification Endogenous ABA and JA levels were determined as described by
Lehmann et al. (1995). In this ELISA an antibody highly specific for
(−)-JA and l-amino acid conjugates of (−)-JA, as
specified by Knöfel et al. (1990), was used. ABA/JA sample
quantitation values given are averages ± sd
(n = 5). Gel-Blot Analysis of RNA Total plant RNA was isolated and subjected to electrophoresis (10
μg of RNA per slot) in agarose-formaldehyde gels as described by
Logemann et al. (1987). Blotting and hybridization conditions were as
described by Amasino (1986). Probes used for radioactive labeling
consisted of potato Pin2 (cDNA 1; Sanchez-Serrano et al.,
1986). Each experiment was repeated independently at least five times.
The northern blots and ABA/JA quantification shown in the figures are
representatives of the average. Membrane Potential Recordings Quartz glass capillaries with a solid filament (Hilgenberg,
Malsfeld, Germany) were pulled on a laser-heated pulling device (P2000,
Sutter Instruments, Navaro, CA), resulting in a tip diameter of 150 nm.
These capillaries were filled with 0.1 m KCl, as described
by Fisahn et al. (1986). For recordings of the membrane potential,
these capillaries were mounted on the headstage of a gene-clamp
amplifier (model HS 2A, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). The ground
reference consisted of an Ag/AgCl wire electrode that was attached to
the stem as described by Fromm et al. (1995). For a detailed
description of the protocol for membrane potential recordings, see
Herde et al. (1998). RESULTS Pin2 Gene Expression Occurs in flacca and
sitiens Only after Heat Treatment Whole plants were mechanically wounded, treated with electrical
current, or gently burned at the tip of a leaf. After 6 h, the
time at which wound-induced JA accumulation reached its highest levels,
treated and nontreated systemic leaves were harvested and analyzed for
Pin2 gene expression by northern analysis (Fig.
(Fig.1).1
Differential Accumulation of ABA and JA Endogenous levels of ABA and JA in the mutants
notabilis, flacca, and sitiens were
determined with all three stimuli. In particular, hormone concentration
was measured 6 h after treatment in both treated leaves (local)
and leaves located distal (systemic) of the treated ones. As expected,
ABA and JA accumulated in wild-type tomato plants following wounding,
current application, and heat treatment (Figs.
(Figs.22
JA was measured to confirm the existence of an alternative pathway that
is independent of endogenous ABA levels and was found to accumulate to
a minor extent after elicitation by mechanical wounding or current
application in notabilis, flacca, and
sitiens mutants compared with wild- type plants (Fig.
(Fig.3).3 Membrane Potential Recordings In the signal transduction cascade mediating elicitor- induced
Pin2 gene expression, membrane transport events precede
hormone biosynthesis and changes in gene expression patterns. To
measure relaxation kinetics of membrane potentials, a microelectrode
was targeted to the region of the most negative membrane potential
within the major vein of a tomato leaf (Herde et al., 1998). Upon
arrival of the microelectrode in the target region and establishment of
a steady-state recording of the membrane potential, one of the three
stimuli was applied to a remote leaf and the electrical signal was
recorded (Herde et al., 1998). In wild- type tomato plants all three
stimuli resulted in an initial rapid depolarization that was followed
by a second time constant (Herde et al., 1998). A prolonged
depolarization was observed during this second phase. The relaxation kinetics of the membrane potential that were generated
in notabilis and flacca plants upon wounding,
current application, and heat treatment resembled those of wild-type
plants (Fig. (Fig.4;4
Application of exogenous ABA to microincisions of the major vein of
wild-type tomato leaves induced characteristic changes of the membrane
potential (Fig. (Fig.5).5
DISCUSSION Previous studies revealed local and systemic induction of
Pin2 gene expression and JA accumulation upon mechanical
wounding and electrical current in wild-type tomato plants (Fig. (Fig.1).1 Since exogenous application of JA did not evoke an elevation in ABA
(Peña-Cortés et al., 1996), the accumulation of this
hormone in wild-type plants upon heat treatment demonstrated that
elicitation by heat has the capacity to activate two biosynthetic
pathways independently (i.e. ABA and JA biosynthesis). Furthermore, the
accumulation of JA in sitiens plants indicated that heat
treatment was able to activate JA biosynthesis independently of the
internal levels of ABA (Fig. (Fig.3).3 By analyzing tomato mutants that were progressively impaired in ABA
biosynthesis, we obtained additional information concerning a minimal
content of ABA required for stress-induced Pin2 gene
expression (Fig. (Fig.1).1 The ABA level that accumulated in wounded and current-treated plants
was roughly reflected by the respective JA content of wild-type and
mutant plants after these treatments. These findings are in line with
the results of Peña-Cortés et al. (1995), who demonstrated
that the application of ABA is able to induce JA biosynthesis and,
furthermore, that JA is located downstream of ABA in the signal
transduction cascade leading to Pin2 gene expression.
Conversely, unwounded control plants of the wild type and the
notabilis, flacca, and sitiens mutants
had almost identical levels of JA, suggesting that JA biosynthesis is
not influenced by endogenous levels of ABA. Harms et al. (1995)
reported that high endogenous levels of JA in transgenic plants
overexpressing a flax allene oxide synthase cDNA did not induce
constitutive Pin2 gene expression. One possible explanation
for these phenomena is that endogenous ABA and JA are stored in
cellular compartments different from those where ABA and JA accumulate
upon wounding. JA biosynthesis is suggested to occur in the chloroplast
(Harms et al., 1995), which implies that accumulation of JA in this
organelle is not sufficient to lead to changes in the expression of
JA-responsive genes such as Pin2. The results presented here indicate an involvement of ABA in the early
events of the signal transduction cascade mediating wound-induced
Pin2 gene expression. In particular, wild-type tomato plants
generated an electrical signal upon all three stimuli, mechanical
wounding, current application, and heat treatment. Similarly, the
relaxation kinetics of the membrane potential that were generated in
notabilis and flacca plants upon these stimuli
resembled those of wild-type plants (Fig. (Fig.4;4 In the mutant with the lowest endogenous ABA content,
sitiens, there were no changes in the membrane potential
upon mechanical wounding or current application (Herde et al., 1998).
In contrast, application of a heat stimulus resulted in relaxation
kinetics of the membrane potential consisting of a fast depolarization
followed by a second time constant. The results of the Pin2
gene expression analysis suggested that the generation of electrical
signals upon heat treatment is independent of endogenous ABA levels.
Moreover, the depolarization of the slow component within the
ABA-deficient plants was not as pronounced as in the wild type, which
is in agreement with a progressive reduction in endogenous levels of
ABA within the different mutants. Like wound-induced Pin2
gene expression, there was a distinct threshold value required for
propagation of electrical signals within the plant. Compared with the
role of ABA in wound-induced Pin2 gene expression, two
differences are obvious: (a) the variation potential generated upon
mechanical damage or current application became less pronounced in
correlation with progressive attenuation in endogenous ABA levels,
indicating a graduated response to different levels of ABA; and (b) the
ABA threshold value required for a change in the membrane potential
upon wounding and current application (between 8% and 21% of the wild
type) was below that required for an induction of Pin2 gene
expression (between 21% and 47% of the wild type). Resting membrane
potential is also dependent on ABA levels. In parallel to progressive
decreases in ABA content, the resting membrane potentials became more
negative (Fig. (Fig.4;4 The results presented in this report suggest that the ABA-dependent
pathway leading to Pin2 gene expression upon wounding and
current application requires ABA levels ranging between 21% and 47%
of those found in wild- type tomato plants. Within these ranges, a
distinct threshold value seems to exist, functioning as an on/off
switch for the subsequent Pin2 gene activation. In contrast,
heat-induced Pin2 mRNA accumulation is regulated by
triggering directly the biosynthesis of JA by an alternative pathway
that is independent of normal levels of ABA. In terms of the membrane
potential, two major differences emerged between wild-type and
ABA-deficient tomato plants. First, ABA-deficient mutants were not able
to generate electrical signals upon wounding and current application
below a certain threshold value of endogenous ABA. Conversely,
stimulation by heat induces the generation of electrical signals
independently of ABA. Unlike the threshold level of ABA required for
Pin2 gene expression, the threshold level of ABA for
membrane transporter activation ranged between 8% and 21% of the wild
type. Second, resting membrane potential was more negative in ABA-
deficient mutants, in accordance with decreasing levels of endogenous
ABA. Exogenous application of ABA to wild-type tomato plants induced
transient changes in membrane potentials, indicating the essential role
of ABA in the generation of electrical signals within plants. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank C. Gebhardt and Dr. R. Atzorn for JA and ABA
measurements. Abbreviation:
Footnotes 1This work was supported by Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft grant no. 571/2 to J.F. and H.P.C. LITERATURE CITED
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
||||||||||||||||
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec; 86(24):9851-9855.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989]Plant Cell. 1991 Sep; 3(9):963-972.
[Plant Cell. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9; 92(10):4106-13.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Plant Cell. 1992 Feb; 4(2):129-134.
[Plant Cell. 1992]Plant Physiol. 1992 Mar; 98(3):995-1002.
[Plant Physiol. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec; 86(24):9851-9855.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989]Plant Cell. 1992 Sep; 4(9):1157-70.
[Plant Cell. 1992]Plant Cell. 1991 Sep; 3(9):963-972.
[Plant Cell. 1991]Plant Physiol. 1996 Oct; 112(2):853-860.
[Plant Physiol. 1996]Plant Physiol. 1996 Oct; 112(2):853-860.
[Plant Physiol. 1996]Anal Biochem. 1987 May 15; 163(1):16-20.
[Anal Biochem. 1987]Anal Biochem. 1986 Feb 1; 152(2):304-7.
[Anal Biochem. 1986]Plant Physiol. 1995 Oct; 109(2):375-384.
[Plant Physiol. 1995]Plant Physiol. 1996 Oct; 112(2):853-860.
[Plant Physiol. 1996]Plant Cell. 1992 Feb; 4(2):129-134.
[Plant Cell. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9; 92(10):4106-13.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Plant Cell. 1995 Oct; 7(10):1645-1654.
[Plant Cell. 1995]FASEB J. 1988 Dec; 2(15):3074-82.
[FASEB J. 1988]Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988 Jul 26; 320(1199):325-43.
[Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988]