• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jan 1, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3218555
NIHMSID: NIHMS325638

Hdac-Mediated Control of Endochondral and Intramembranous Ossification

Abstract

Histone deacetylases (Hdacs) remove acetyl groups (CH3CO-) from ε-amino groups in lysine residues within histones and other proteins. This post-translational (de) modification alters protein stability, protein-protein interactions, and chromatin structure. Hdac activity plays important roles in the development of all organs and tissues, including the mineralized skeleton. Bone is a dynamic tissue that forms and regenerates by two processes: endochondral and intramembranous ossification. Chondrocytes and osteoblasts are responsible for producing the extracellular matrices of skeletal tissues. Several Hdacs contribute to the molecular pathways and chromatin changes that regulate tissue-specific gene expression during chondrocyte and osteoblast specification, maturation and terminal differentiation. In this review, we summarize the roles of class I and class II Hdacs in chondrocytes and osteoblasts. The effects of small molecule Hdac inhibitors on the skeleton are also discussed.

Keywords: Lysine deacetylase, chondrocytes, cartilage, osteoblasts, Runx2

INTRODUCTION

The vertebrate skeleton is an endocrine and mechanical organ that facilitates locomotion, protects vital organs, provides a niche for cells of the immune system, and regulates mineral homeostasis, metabolism, and male fertility.14 Disruptions in normal skeletal development and age-associated declines in skeletal maintenance have negative consequences on overall health and quality of life. Skeletal development and regeneration proceed by two general processes: endochondral bone formation and intramembranous ossification.5, 6 In each case, mesenchymal progenitors condense and begin developmental programs that include chondrogenesis (as is the case during endochondral bone formation) and/ or osteoblastogenesis. In adults, the skeleton is constantly being remodeled in response to physiological needs and repaired to heal fractures. During remodeling and repair, the vasculature and perichondrium bring mesenchymal progenitors to skeletal sites. The differentiation of mesenchymal cells into chondrocytes or osteoblasts, and their ability to maintain the differentiated phenotypes that exert autocrine, paracrine, and/or endocrine control requires the expression of particular gene programs and the stable repression of genes that are not needed for skeletal functions. These cell type-specific gene expression programs must be maintained in daughter cells during proliferation phases to prevent trans- or de-differentiation of the cell phenotype. Epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation, histone acetylation and methylation, and microRNA programming contribute to the differentiation of mesenchymal cells to the chondrocyte or osteoblast lineage as well as the maintenance and functional activities of these cell types. In this review, we will focus on the roles that histone deacetylases (Hdacs) play in regulating gene expression in chondrocytes and osteoblasts during ossification.

Hdacs and Gene Expression

Gene expression requires that transcriptional units in DNA are made accessible to RNA polymerase II. Transcription factors bind to promoter and enhancer elements and facilitate the recruitment of RNA polymerase II. Although some transcription factors are required for the formation of specific tissues and are often referred to as master transcription factors (e.g., Runx2 in osteoblasts and Sox9 in chondrocytes79), it is the temporal, spatial, and combinatorial control of multiple transcription factors that provides tissue-specific regulation of gene expression.10, 11 Transcription factors bind to DNA and provide docking sites for transcriptional co-activators and repressors, including lysine deacetylases (Kdacs) and their enzymatic counterparts, lysine acetyl transferases (Kats).

Histone deacetylases (Hdacs) are Kdacs that regulate transcription in an epigenetic manner by affecting chromatin structure and transcription factor activity. Hdacs remove negatively charged acetyl groups (CH3CO-) from ε-amino groups of lysine residues in histones, to restore the positively charged side chain. This alters the structural confirmation of histones, prevents associations with bromodomain-containing proteins, increases the affinity of the lysine side chain for negatively charged DNA, and thereby facilitates chromatin condensation and transcriptional repression. Hdacs can also deacetylate lysine residues on non-histone proteins, including Runx2 and other transcription factors,1215 affecting their stability and/or cellular localization to influence gene expression programs.

The 18 Hdacs in the human and genomes are subdivided into four groups based on their structure and function (Figure 1). Class I Hdacs (Hdacs 1, 2, 3, and 8) are structurally similar to each other and to the S. cerevisiae protein Rpd3.16 They are broadly expressed in most tissues and are usually localized to cell nuclei.17, 18 Class II Hdacs (Hdacs 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10) are similar to the S. cerevisiae protein Hda1 16 and demonstrate a more tissue restricted expression pattern making them important contributors to cell-specific differentiation programs. Furthermore, class II Hdacs shuttle between the cytoplasm and nucleus in response to activation of specific kinase signaling pathways. Hdacs 6 and 10 are subgrouped as class IIb Hdacs, due to the presence of two catalytic domains. Unlike the Zn2+ -dependent catalytic domains of class I and II Hdacs, class III Hdacs (the sirtuins (Sirts), homologs of the S. cerevisiae protein Sir2) require NAD+ for their enzymatic activity. Sirts 1, 6, and 7 are predominantly localized to cell nuclei, whereas Sirt2 is cytoplasmic and Sirts 3–5 are present in mitochondria.19 Hdac11, which is the sole member of class IV, shares similarities with both class I and class II Hdacs. Here the roles of class I and II Hdacs in endochondral and intramembranous ossification are reviewed.

Figure 1
Mammalian class I, II and IV histone deacetylases.

Hdac Control of Endochondral Ossification

Endochondral ossification is a highly organized and tightly controlled developmental process and Hdacs play crucial roles in its orchestration (Figure 2). Endochondral ossification gives rise to the majority of bones in the skeleton, including the long bones and vertebrae, and evolves via successive steps of mesenchymal condensation, chondrogenesis, chondrocyte maturation and hypertrophy, and finally vasculogenesis and osteoblast recruitment.

Figure 2
Hdacs regulate endochondral ossification

The initial steps of endochondral ossification involve the condensation of mesenchymal cells. The roles of the various Hdacs in these first steps are difficult to ascertain because many Hdac knockout mice die during early embryogenesis. This is the case for Hdac1, 3 and 7 as germline deletion of these genes causes lethality prior to embryonic day 10.5 (E10.5).2022 In contrast, Hdac2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9 do not appear to regulate mesenchymal condensation because individual deletion of these enzymes allows early endochondral bone formation.2325 It is unclear if this is due to the fact that these Hdacs are not expressed in the mesenchymal progenitors or if another protein compensates for their loss.

Several Hdacs contribute to the next phase of endochondral ossification, which is the commitment of mesenchymal precursors to the chondrocyte lineage.7, 26 Hdac1 associates with Nkx3.2, an essential transcriptional repressor governing the formation of the cartilage anlagen during endochondral ossification.27, 28 Furthermore, Hdac1 represses Smad-dependent signaling to control responses to Bmp2, a critical chondrogenic factor.29 Hdac4 and Hdac5 also regulate Smad signaling downstream of Tgf-β and thus may participate in controlling the process of chondrogenesis.30

Chondrocytes within the growth plate promote bone lengthening through proliferation, deposition of an extracellular matrix (ECM), and hypertrophy. Hdac1 regulates expression of several cartilage ECM genes including aggrecan, collagen type 2, collagen type 9, and cartilage oligomeric protein (Comp).3133 Hdac2 also regulates expression of chondrocyte specific matrix genes, including collagen type 2, aggrecan and collagen type 11.34 Hdac1 KO embryos die prior to chondrogenesis, but Hdac2 deletion causes only partially penetrant embryonic lethality, with significantly decreased survival of post-natal null animals.24 Of interest, a runted phenotype was observed in the surviving Hdac2 null animals, suggesting impairment of growth plate development. Double mutant Hdac5:Hdac9 mice are also smaller in size despite the fact that loss of either Hdac5 or Hdac9 has no effect.25 These data suggest that Hdacs contribute to chondrocyte proliferation and/or hypertrophy, but some redundancy exists amongst these Hdacs in regulating the endochondral ossification process.

Genetic deletion of Hdac3 and Hdac4 revealed the roles of these proteins in chondrocyte maturation.23, 25, 35 Hdac3 and Hdac4 control chondrocyte hypertrophy through their interaction with key transcription factors Runx2 and Mef2, as well as with the co-repressor Zpf521.23, 35, 36 Although global loss of Hdac3 results in embryonic lethality, conditional loss of Hdac3 function within osterix-expressing cells decreased body size.35 This smaller overall body size was accompanied by a narrower growth plate and a relative expansion of the hypertrophic zone.35 Additional studies are needed with more cartilage specific drivers of Cre (e.g., Col2-Cre) to fully characterize the role of Hdac3 in chondrocytes. In contrast to Hdac3, mice with germline deletion of Hdac4 function are viable, but exhibit premature endochondral ossification.23 Hdac4 ablation accelerated chondrocyte hypertrophy, as evidenced by increased expression of Ihh, Runx2 and collagen type X within the developing growth plate.23 The effect mimicked Runx2 overexpression in chondrocytes.23 It was thus concluded that Hdac4 binds to Runx2 and represses Runx2-induced hypertrophy.23, 37 Zfp521, a zinc-finger protein and transcription co-repressor that is crucial for maintaining PTH-inducible chondrocyte proliferation, is a component of the Runx2-Hdac4 repressor complex.36 Hdac4 also inhibits Mef2C transcriptional activity to control chondrocyte hypertrophy.23, 37

During the late stages of endochondral ossification, hypertropic chondrocytes down-regulate expression of type 2a collagen, begin to secrete type X collagen, and calcify the extra-cellular matrix.38 With further maturation, hypertrophic chondrocytes produce vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf), which promotes vascularization of the growth plate. Hypertrophic chondrocytes also produce matrix metalloproteinases (Mmps), which aid in calcified cartilage matrix turnover occurring in primary spongiosa formation. Hdacs regulate Vegf and Mmp13 expression in multiple cell types, thus they are likely to contribute growth plate biology as well.3942

Ultimately chondrocytes undergo apoptosis, leaving behind the calcified cartilage matrix as a scaffold for bone formation. Vascularization facilitates the recruitment of osteoblast progenitor cells required for the replacement of the collagen type II-dominated matrix with a collagen type I -dominated bone matrix and the formation of the primary spongiosa. These newly recruited precursors contribute to formation of osteoblasts responsible for trabecular (or cancellous) bone deposition; meanwhile, perichondral cells adjacent to the zone of hypertrophy become osteoblasts that form the bony collar. Osteoblast differentiation requires the master transcription factor Runx2.8, 9 Several Hdacs (Hdac1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) are expressed in osteoblasts and bind Runx2.14, 4345 Conditional loss of Hdac3 within osteo-chondroprogenitor cells decreases bone density and reduces osteoblast numbers, but increases marrow adiposity.46 These data point to a potential role for Hdac3 in regulating lineage commitment of mesenchymal cells. Interactions between Runx2 and Hdac3 are enhanced in both premature and mature osteoblasts by the co-repressor Zfp521 to control not only osteoblast differentiation, but also osteoblast-dependent osteoclastogenesis.47

A role for Hdac1 during bone formation was supported by the differential expression of Hdac1 during osteoblast differentiation. Hdac1 expression and presence on key osteoblast differentiation gene promoters (such as osterix and osteocalcin) declines during osteoblast maturation.48 siRNA-mediated suppression of Hdac1 induces osteoblast differentiation.48 Mechanistically, Hdac1 regulates osteoblast differentiation through a physical association with Runx2 to decrease transcriptional activity and repress the stimulatory effects of p300.48

Several class II Hdacs are also involved in osteoblast maturation. Hdac4 regulates osteoblast maturation by controlling expression of Mmp13 through a Runx2-dependent and PTH-sensitive mechanism.49 Hdac4 and Hdac5 also regulate Tgf- β-dependent signaling and downstream gene repression in osteoblasts through an interaction with a Runx2/Smad3 complex.30 Hdac6 is expressed in differentiated osteoblasts and binds Runx2 to repress gene expression, but its time in the nucleus is very short as it is rapidly exported from the nucleus by unknown signals.43,50 Hdac6 deficiency results in a minor increase in trabecular bone density.51 Hdac7 also inhibits the activity of Runx2 and slows osteoblast maturation.52 Bmp2 disrupts the interaction between Runx2 and Hdac7 by stimulating protein kinase D, which phosphorylates Hdac7, promotes its association with 14-3-3 proteins and facilitates nuclear export.50 Bmp2 also induces nuclear export of Hdac4 in committed osteoblasts, but it did not effect the localization of Hdac5, which remained in the nucleus, or Hdac6, which was firmly cytoplasmic.50 Thus, one mechanism of action for anabolic agents is to alter class II Hdac compartmentalization within the cell.

Hdacs Regulate Intramembranous Ossification and Craniofacial Development

In addition to the important role Hdacs play in endochondral ossification, intramembranous ossification is likewise regulated by Hdac functions (Figure 3). Since Runx2 plays an important role in mediating osteoblast differentiation in both types of bone formation, it is not surprising that many Hdac mutants also display craniofacial abnormalities reminiscent of defects in intramembranous ossification. For instance, Hdac3 deficiency in osterix-positive osteo-chondroprogenitor cells decreased skull bone density as manifested by decreased calvarial thickness and increased porosity.35 In addition to Hdac3, Hdac8 is essential for proper skull development as evidenced by the effect of germline Hdac8 deletion. Conditional Hdac8 deletion using Wnt1-Cre decreased expression of the homeobox transcription factors Otx2 and Lhx1 and hindered intramembranous ossification.53 This phenotype was not observed with conditional deletion of Hdac8 in osteoblasts or in mesenchymal precursor cells with either Col1-Cre or Twist-1-Cre respectively.53 Thus, Hdac8 plays a crucial role in the specification of neural crest progenitor cells to the osteoblast lineage.

Figure 3
Hdacs regulate intramembranous bone formation

HDACS in Human Skeletal Disease

Given the important role of Hdac activity in bone cell function and murine skeletal development, it is not surprising that aberrant class II Hdac activity is associated with skeletal diseases in humans, including osteoarthritis and osteoporosis.

HDAC4 and HDAC5

Recently, HDAC5 was identified as a locus affecting BMD in a genome-wide association study (GWAS),54 and HDAC5 levels were elevated in two juveniles with primary osteoporosis.55 Consistent with these findings, increasing Hdac5 (via antagonizing a natural Hdac5 repressor, miR-2861) decreased bone formation and caused bone loss in animal models.55 Inactivating mutations in HDAC4 are associated with brachydactyly,56 but otherwise HDAC4 has yet to be conclusively linked to skeletal disease in humans. However, both HDAC4 and HDAC5 interact with MEF2C, another BMD-affecting locus identified in the GWAS described above and later confirmed in a second population cohort.57 HDAC4 and HDAC5 repress MEF2C’s transcriptional activity.54 This interaction is relevant because MEF2 transcription factors are implicated in the regulation of adult bone mass,58 likely in relation to Wnt signaling, as MEF2 transcription factors (including MEF2C) are essential for the transcriptional activation of SOST, the gene that produces the Wnt pathway inhibitor sclerostin.58

HDAC7

Cartilage from osteoarthritis patients demonstrated elevated levels of HDAC7 mRNA as compared to cartilage obtained from healthy controls.59 Furthermore, HDAC7-positive immunohistochemical staining was more prevalent in the middle- and deep zones of the articular cartilage of OA patients as compared to healthy controls. HDAC7 represses expression of MMP13,59 a matrix metalloproteinase linked to cartilage destruction, and thus HDAC7 increases may contribute to the progression and severity of cartilage breakdown.

Hdac Inhibitors and Bone Health

Pharmaceutical Hdac inhibitors are being rapidly developed and tested in clinical trials against a wide spectrum of diseases and clinical conditions including cancer, arthritis, traumatic brain injury, and cystic fibrosis.6063 Since class I and class II Hdac activity is already known to be associated with several human skeletal diseases (as described above), the potential for inhibitor therapies that target the enzymatic action of these Hdacs appears enticing. Early studies, predominantly conducted using in vitro models, supported the idea that Hdac inhibitors could be promising skeletal therapies as they inhibited osteoclasts and stimulated osteoblasts.6468

These in vitro studies, however, are sharply contrasted by clinical reports of bone loss in patients on long-term valproate therapy. In several patient cohorts, prolonged exposure to valproate decreased bone mineral density in both axial and appendicular sites in children and adults,6971 leading to increased fracture risk.72 These studies have many confounding factors, including general decreased physical activity of epileptic patients, but more mechanistic studies utilizing rodent models have confirmed that Hdac inhibition has negative consequences on bone. Mice and rats both demonstrate reduced bone mineral content and compromised skeletal architecture following valproate administration.73, 74 Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA, also known as vorinostat or ZolinzaTM), another FDA-approved Hdac inhibitor, also appears to have negative consequences on the skeleton. A preclinical animal model designed to test the effects of SAHA on tumors growing within the bone microenvironment confirmed that SAHA reduced tumor burden in long bones of immunocompromised mice, but unexpectedly found that bone mass of the contralateral limbs was simultaneously reduced.75 An independent investigation conducted with C57BL/6 mice concluded that SAHA administration led to a reduction in trabecular bone mass and architecture.76 Understanding the mechanisms behind Hdac inhibitor-induced bone loss requires a more in-depth consideration of the effects of these treatments on the cells responsible for bone resorption (osteoclasts) and bone formation (osteoblasts), as well as on the progenitor pools from which these cells arise.

Hdac Inhibition and Bone Resorption

Osteoclasts are bone-specific macrophages that are essential for bone formation, elongation, and remodeling as they stimulate osteoblast maturation, remove damaged bone, and influence bone shape. Several studies demonstrated that Hdac inhibition decreases osteoclast survival and activity in vitro. The Hdac inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) promoted apoptosis in mature osteoclasts derived from bone marrow cells.66 Similarly, the short chain fatty acid sodium butyrate suppressed osteoclast differentiation from hematopoietic precursors in vitro.67, 77 Depsipeptide, in the cyclic peptide class of Hdac inhibitors, inhibited osteoclastogenesis by increasing interferon-β production, and decreasing expression of pro-osteoclastogenesis factors c-Fos and Socs-3.67 Studies with human osteoclasts generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells indicate that simultaneous inhibition of both class I and II Hdacs may be necessary for osteoclastic suppression by Hdac inhibitors. Thus, pan Hdac inhibitors (e.g., 1179.4b78 and SAHA) suppressed osteoclast activity in vitro, whereas drugs that preferentially targeted class I (MS-275) or class II (2664.1279) Hdacs were less effective until utilized as a combined treatment.80 However, molecular studies suggest that targeting certain class II Hdacs may not prevent osteoclastogenesis at all, and instead may actually support osteoclast differentiation. Hdac3 suppression via shRNA inhibited osteoclast differentiation, whereas Hdac7 suppression increased osteoclast differentiation compared to controls, likely because of loss of its suppressive effect on Mitf-dependent transcriptional activity.81

Hdac6 is another important class II Hdac in osteoclasts. Hdac6 is a tubulin deacetylase that regulates tubulin polymerization and cellular attachment.82, 83 Hdac6-regulated tubulin deacetylation controls podosome formation and osteoclast migration along the bone surface.84,85 C-Cbl isoforms displace Hdac6 from tubulin and prevent osteoclast apoptosis while stabilizing microtubules and podosomes. Taken together, these studies indicate that osteoclasts are generally intolerant of class I Hdac inhibition in vitro, but further research is needed to understand the role of specific Hdacs in osteoclast development and survival.

Reconciling the effects of Hdac inhibitors on osteoclasts in vitro with their effects on bone resorption in vivo is difficult. Clinical reports offer conflicting evidence; serum and urinary markers of bone resorption were reported to increase, decrease, or remain unchanged in patients on valproate therapy.8688 Animal models, as present, have also failed to demonstrate a consistent in vivo effect of Hdac inhibition on bone resorption. Valproate-treated C3H/HeJ mice experience compromised trabecular architecture with no histomorphometric changes in osteoclast number. In immunocompromised mice, SAHA induced bone loss was associated with an increases in serum and histological markers of bone resorption,89 but in normal C57BL/6 mice, SAHA administration caused bone loss without inducing changes in circulating or histomorphometric indices of bone resorption.76 Thus, understanding the effects of Hdac inhibition on bone resorption in vivo requires further study.

Hdac inhibition and bone formation

A large body of literature demonstrates that Hdac inhibitors promote osteoblast differentiation in vitro or ex vivo.64, 90 Valproate, TSA, sodium butyrate, and MS-275 all have stimulatory effects on several osteoblast cell lines, primary calvarial osteoblasts, and in calvarial organ cultures.64, 68, 91 In particular, TSA increased expression levels of osteoblast marker genes including collagen type I and osteopontin, and all four of these Hdac inhibitors increased Runx2-dependent transcriptional activity without negatively affecting cell viability.64 Hdac inhibitors have been consistently reported to increase osteoblast gene expression, mineralized matrix deposition, alkaline phosphatase production, and Runx2 transcriptional activity in vitro by numerous independent researchers.64, 90, 9294

Similar to what happens with osteoclasts, these effects of Hdac inhibitors on osteoblasts in vitro do not translate to a similar response in vivo. Although SAHA-treated C57BL/6 mice had increased indices of local osteoblast activity including mineral apposition rate (MAR) and bone formation rate (paralleling increases in osteoblastic gene expression and mineralized matrix production seen in osteoblasts following in vitro exposure to Hdac inhibitors64, 93, 94), levels of the circulating bone formation marker P1NP were reduced, and histological indices of osteoblast numbers were decreased. These confounding data highlight a limitation of dynamic histomorphometry, particularly MAR measurements, which only measure the activity of mature osteoblasts where bone is present. Biochemical markers are generally more reflective measures of overall bone formation activity. However, circulating osteocalcin (a marker of bone formation) was reported to be both higher86, 88, 95 and lower87, 96 in patients receiving long-term valproate therapy compared to controls. Recent studies indicate that human cells treated with valproate reduce production of type I collagen and osteonectin (a collagen binding glycoprotein necessary for maintenance of bone mass), supporting a direct effect of valproate that may contribute to bone loss.97

Why, then, do the in vitro stimulatory effects of Hdac inhibitors on osteoblasts not translate to increased bone formation in vivo? The deleterious effects of Hdac inhibitors on osteoblast progenitors may explain this. Hdac inhibitors promote apoptosis by activating both extrinsic (death ligands/receptors) and intrinsic (mitochondrial proteins) pro-apoptotic pathways.98, 99 This is one reason that Hdac inhibitors are such effective anti-cancer therapeutics, as they preferentially target rapidly proliferating cells and induce apoptosis. However, this mechanism raises concern regarding the effects of Hdac inhibitors in regenerative organs, like bone, especially when considering their consequences on self-renewing mesenchymal progenitor cell populations. Mouse embryos from valproate or TSA dams show increased somatic apoptosis, likely contributing to axial skeletal malformations,100 which may explain why children born to mothers treated with valproate have an increased chance of developing craniofacial bone defects.101 More importantly, adult bone marrow stromal cells, from which osteoblasts arise, appear susceptible to Hdac inhibition. Both mouse and human bone marrow stromal cells undergo DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis following culture with Hdac inhibitors.76, 93, 94, 102 Interestingly, once these cells are sufficiently differentiated into mature, matrix producing osteoblasts, Hdac inhibitors fail to cause cell death and instead begin to have stimulatory effect.76, 92 Thus, although Hdac inhibitors may stimulate mature, functional osteoblasts, this positive effect is outweighed by their simultaneous depletion of the immature osteoblast progenitor pool, leading to a net decrease in osteoblasts and overall bone formation.

Conclusion / Future Directions

Class I and II Hdacs contribute greatly to skeletal development by binding to transcription factors that control gene expression during specific stages of chondrocyte and osteoblast maturation. It is clear that broad inhibition of Hdacs with pharmaceuticals has adverse effects on mesenchymal precursors and bone formation. Conditional deletion of some individual Hdacs has revealed stage-specific roles, but systematic deletion of every Hdac in skeletal tissues during relevant stages of differentiation is necessary to fully understand their roles during development. This may ultimately lead to better designs for Hdac inhibitors that effectively treat cancer and other diseases without harming the skeleton. Studies are also needed to determine how Hdacs contribute to orthopedic problems such as fracture repair and if existing Hdac inhibitors are effective at treating heterotopic ossification.

Tissue-restricted expression and intracellular mobility between the cytoplasm and nucleus are well-described characteristics of class II Hdacs. Surprisingly, very little is known about how class II Hdacs are regulated at the transcriptional and translation levels. Moreover, the signaling pathways and posttranslational modifications that influence cytoplasmic-nuclear shuttling are incompletely understood. This knowledge could provide new mechanistic insights for regulating the expression and/or localization of specific enzymes.

There are 18 genes that encode Hdacs in the human and mouse genomes, meanwhile there are greater than 1800 transcription factor genes. It is clear that transcriptional control of gene expression in chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and all other cell types is specified by the combinatorial association of the transcription factors with DNA sequences, each other, and cofactors like Hdacs. New genome-wide sequencing technologies will provide a plethora of data in the next few years that will increase our understanding of the genetic and epigenetic events regulating gene expression. It will also be important to know how interactions between transcription factors and co-repressors are regulated in each tissue. As was discussed, Runx2 binds multiple Hdacs but it is not understood if these are high-affinity interactions or if signaling pathways influence their pairing. Phosphorylation of specific serine residues in Runx1 releases or prevents interactions between Runx1 and Hdac1/Hdac3 in myeloid cells.103 Similar events may influence the activity of Runx2 and other transcription factors involved in endochondral and intramembranous bone formation. Thus, while much has been accomplished in the last decade, more work is needed to understand the mechanisms of action of Hdacs in the skeleton.

Acknowledgments

The National Institutes of Health supported this work through grants AR48147, AR56950, AR60140, and DE20194.

References

1. Lee NK, Sowa H, Hinoi E, Ferron M, Ahn JD, Confavreux C, et al. Endocrine regulation of energy metabolism by the skeleton. Cell. 2007 Aug 10;130(3):456–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Oury F, Sumara G, Sumara O, Ferron M, Chang H, Smith CE, et al. Endocrine regulation of male fertility by the skeleton. Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):796–809. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Quarles LD. Endocrine functions of bone in mineral metabolism regulation. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008 Dec;118(12):3820–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Yin T, Li L. The stem cell niches in bone. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2006 May;116(5):1195–201. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Tuan RS. Biology of developmental and regenerative skeletogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Oct;427(Suppl):S105–17. [PubMed]
6. Yang Y. Skeletal morphogenesis during embryonic development. Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression. 2009;19(3):197–218. [PubMed]
7. Bi W, Deng JM, Zhang Z, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B. Sox9 is required for cartilage formation. Nature genetics. 1999 May;22(1):85–9. [PubMed]
8. Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi A, Sasaki K, Deguchi K, et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell. 1997 May 30;89(5):755–64. [PubMed]
9. Otto F, Thornell AP, Crompton T, Denzel A, Gilmour KC, Rosewell IR, et al. Cbfa1, a candidate gene for cleidocranial dysplasia syndrome, is essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone development. Cell. 1997 May 30;89(5):765–71. [PubMed]
10. Lemon B, Tjian R. Orchestrated response: a symphony of transcription factors for gene control. Genes & development. 2000 Oct 15;14(20):2551–69. [PubMed]
11. Zaidi SK, Young DW, Choi JY, Pratap J, Javed A, Montecino M, et al. The dynamic organization of gene-regulatory machinery in nuclear microenvironments. EMBO Rep. 2005 Feb;6(2):128–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Glozak MA, Sengupta N, Zhang X, Seto E. Acetylation and deacetylation of non-histone proteins. Gene. 2005 Dec 19;363:15–23. [PubMed]
13. Choudhary C, Kumar C, Gnad F, Nielsen ML, Rehman M, Walther TC, et al. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science (New York, NY. 2009 Aug 14;325(5942):834–40. [PubMed]
14. Jeon EJ, Lee KY, Choi NS, Lee MH, Kim HN, Jin YH, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 stimulates Runx2 acetylation. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006 Jun 16;281(24):16502–11. [PubMed]
15. Juan LJ, Shia WJ, Chen MH, Yang WM, Seto E, Lin YS, et al. Histone deacetylases specifically down-regulate p53-dependent gene activation. J Biol Chem. 2000 Jul 7;275(27):20436–43. [PubMed]
16. de Ruijter AJ, van Gennip AH, Caron HN, Kemp S, van Kuilenburg AB. Histone deacetylases (HDACs): characterization of the classical HDAC family. The Biochemical journal. 2003 Mar 15;370(Pt 3):737–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Chini CC, Escande C, Nin V, Chini EN. HDAC3 is negatively regulated by the nuclear protein DBC1. J Biol Chem. 2010 Dec 24;285(52):40830–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Yang WM, Tsai SC, Wen YD, Fejer G, Seto E. Functional domains of histone deacetylase-3. J Biol Chem. 2002 Mar 15;277(11):9447–54. [PubMed]
19. Michishita E, Park JY, Burneskis JM, Barrett JC, Horikawa I. Evolutionarily conserved and nonconserved cellular localizations and functions of human SIRT proteins. Molecular biology of the cell. 2005 Oct;16(10):4623–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Lagger G, O'Carroll D, Rembold M, Khier H, Tischler J, Weitzer G, et al. Essential function of histone deacetylase 1 in proliferation control and CDK inhibitor repression. The EMBO journal. 2002 Jun 3;21(11):2672–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Chang S, Young BD, Li S, Qi X, Richardson JA, Olson EN. Histone deacetylase 7 maintains vascular integrity by repressing matrix metalloproteinase 10. Cell. 2006 Jul 28;126(2):321–34. [PubMed]
22. Bhaskara S, Chyla BJ, Amann JM, Knutson SK, Cortez D, Sun ZW, et al. Deletion of histone deacetylase 3 reveals critical roles in S phase progression and DNA damage control. Mol Cell. 2008 Apr 11;30(1):61–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Vega RB, Matsuda K, Oh J, Barbosa AC, Yang X, Meadows E, et al. Histone deacetylase 4 controls chondrocyte hypertrophy during skeletogenesis. Cell. 2004 Nov 12;119(4):555–66. [PubMed]
24. Trivedi CM, Luo Y, Yin Z, Zhang M, Zhu W, Wang T, et al. Hdac2 regulates the cardiac hypertrophic response by modulating Gsk3 beta activity. Nat Med. 2007 Mar;13(3):324–31. [PubMed]
25. Chang S, McKinsey TA, Zhang CL, Richardson JA, Hill JA, Olson EN. Histone deacetylases 5 and 9 govern responsiveness of the heart to a subset of stress signals and play redundant roles in heart development. Molecular and cellular biology. 2004 Oct;24(19):8467–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Huang W, Chung UI, Kronenberg HM, de Crombrugghe B. The chondrogenic transcription factor Sox9 is a target of signaling by the parathyroid hormone-related peptide in the growth plate of endochondral bones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001 Jan 2;98(1):160–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Zeng L, Kempf H, Murtaugh LC, Sato ME, Lassar AB. Shh establishes an Nkx3.2/Sox9 autoregulatory loop that is maintained by BMP signals to induce somitic chondrogenesis. Genes & development. 2002 Aug 1;16(15):1990–2005. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Murtaugh LC, Zeng L, Chyung JH, Lassar AB. The chick transcriptional repressor Nkx3.2 acts downstream of Shh to promote BMP-dependent axial chondrogenesis. Developmental cell. 2001 Sep;1(3):411–22. [PubMed]
29. Kim DW, Lassar AB. Smad-dependent recruitment of a histone deacetylase/Sin3A complex modulates the bone morphogenetic protein-dependent transcriptional repressor activity of Nkx3.2. Molecular and cellular biology. 2003 Dec;23(23):8704–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Kang JS, Alliston T, Delston R, Derynck R. Repression of Runx2 function by TGF-beta through recruitment of class II histone deacetylases by Smad3. The EMBO journal. 2005 Jul 20;24(14):2543–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Hall BK, Miyake T. All for one and one for all: condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. Bioessays. 2000 Feb;22(2):138–47. [PubMed]
32. Huh YH, Ryu JH, Chun JS. Regulation of type II collagen expression by histone deacetylase in articular chondrocytes. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007 Jun 8;282(23):17123–31. [PubMed]
33. Liu CJ, Prazak L, Fajardo M, Yu S, Tyagi N, Di Cesare PE. Leukemia/lymphoma-related factor, a POZ domain-containing transcriptional repressor, interacts with histone deacetylase-1 and inhibits cartilage oligomeric matrix protein gene expression and chondrogenesis. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004 Nov 5;279(45):47081–91. [PubMed]
34. Hong S, Derfoul A, Pereira-Mouries L, Hall DJ. A novel domain in histone deacetylase 1 and 2 mediates repression of cartilage-specific genes in human chondrocytes. Faseb J. 2009 Oct;23(10):3539–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Razidlo DF, Whitney TJ, Casper ME, McGee-Lawrence ME, Stensgard BA, Li X, et al. Histone Deacetylase 3 Depletion in Osteo/Chondroprogenitor Cells Decreases Bone Density and Increases Marrow Fat. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(7):e11492. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Correa D, Hesse E, Seriwatanachai D, Kiviranta R, Saito H, Yamana K, et al. Zfp521 is a target gene and key effector of parathyroid hormone-related peptide signaling in growth plate chondrocytes. Developmental cell. 2010 Oct 19;19(4):533–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Arnold MA, Kim Y, Czubryt MP, Phan D, McAnally J, Qi X, et al. MEF2C transcription factor controls chondrocyte hypertrophy and bone development. Developmental cell. 2007 Mar;12(3):377–89. [PubMed]
38. Noonan KJ, Hunziker EB, Nessler J, Buckwalter JA. Changes in cell, matrix compartment, and fibrillar collagen volumes between growth-plate zones. J Orthop Res. 1998 Jul;16(4):500–8. [PubMed]
39. Ellis L, Hammers H, Pili R. Targeting tumor angiogenesis with histone deacetylase inhibitors. Cancer letters. 2009 Aug 8;280(2):145–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Elsharkawy AM, Oakley F, Lin F, Packham G, Mann DA, Mann J. The NF-kappaB p50:p50:HDAC-1 repressor complex orchestrates transcriptional inhibition of multiple pro-inflammatory genes. J Hepatol. 2010 Sep;53(3):519–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Kim MS, Kwon HJ, Lee YM, Baek JH, Jang JE, Lee SW, et al. Histone deacetylases induce angiogenesis by negative regulation of tumor suppressor genes. Nat Med. 2001 Apr;7(4):437–43. [PubMed]
42. Seo HW, Kim EJ, Na H, Lee MO. Transcriptional activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha by HDAC4 and HDAC5 involves differential recruitment of p300 and FIH-1. FEBS Lett. 2009 Jan 5;583(1):55–60. [PubMed]
43. Westendorf JJ, Zaidi SK, Cascino JE, Kahler R, van Wijnen AJ, Lian JB, et al. Runx2 (Cbfa1, AML-3) interacts with histone deacetylase 6 and represses the p21(CIP1/WAF1) promoter. Molecular and cellular biology. 2002 Nov;22(22):7982–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Schroeder TM, Kahler RA, Li X, Westendorf JJ. Histone deacetylase 3 interacts with runx2 to repress the osteocalcin promoter and regulate osteoblast differentiation. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004 Oct 1;279(40):41998–2007. [PubMed]
45. Westendorf JJ. Transcriptional co-repressors of Runx2. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2006 May 1;98(1):54–64. [PubMed]
46. Razidlo D, Whitney T, Stensgard B, Secreto F, Li X, Knutson S, et al., editors. ASBMR 31st Annual Meeting. Denver, CO: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; 2009. Histone Deacetylase 3 Depletion in Osteo/Chondro-progenitor Cells Prevents Osteoblast Maturation, Resulting in Decreased Bone Density and Increased Marrow Fat.
47. Hesse E, Saito H, Kiviranta R, Correa D, Yamana K, Neff L, et al. Zfp521 controls bone mass by HDAC3-dependent attenuation of Runx2 activity. J Cell Biol. 2010 Dec 27;191(7):1271–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Lee HW, Suh JH, Kim AY, Lee YS, Park SY, Kim JB. Histone deacetylase 1-mediated histone modification regulates osteoblast differentiation. Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md. 2006 Oct;20(10):2432–43. [PubMed]
49. Shimizu E, Selvamurugan N, Westendorf JJ, Olson EN, Partridge NC. HDAC4 represses matrix metalloproteinase-13 transcription in osteoblastic cells, and parathyroid hormone controls this repression. J Biol Chem. 2010 Mar 26;285(13):9616–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Jensen ED, Gopalakrishnan R, Westendorf JJ. Bone morphogenic protein 2 activates protein kinase D to regulate histone deacetylase 7 localization and repression of Runx2. J Biol Chem. 2009 Jan 23;284(4):2225–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Zhang Y, Kwon S, Yamaguchi T, Cubizolles F, Rousseaux S, Kneissel M, et al. Mice lacking histone deacetylase 6 have hyperacetylated tubulin but are viable and develop normally. Molecular and cellular biology. 2008 Mar;28(5):1688–701. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Jensen ED, Schroeder TM, Bailey J, Gopalakrishnan R, Westendorf JJ. Histone deacetylase 7 associates with Runx2 and represses its activity during osteoblast maturation in a deacetylation-independent manner. J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Mar;23(3):361–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Haberland M, Mokalled MH, Montgomery RL, Olson EN. Epigenetic control of skull morphogenesis by histone deacetylase 8. Genes & development. 2009 Jul 15;23(14):1625–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Rivadeneira F, Styrkarsdottir U, Estrada K, Halldorsson BV, Hsu YH, Richards JB, et al. Twenty bone-mineral-density loci identified by large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Nature genetics. 2009 Nov;41(11):1199–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Li H, Xie H, Liu W, Hu R, Huang B, Tan YF, et al. A novel microRNA targeting HDAC5 regulates osteoblast differentiation in mice and contributes to primary osteoporosis in humans. J Clin Invest. 2009 Dec;119(12):3666–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Williams SR, Aldred MA, Der Kaloustian VM, Halal F, Gowans G, McLeod DR, et al. Haploinsufficiency of HDAC4 causes brachydactyly mental retardation syndrome, with brachydactyly type E, developmental delays, and behavioral problems. American journal of human genetics. 2010 Aug 13;87(2):219–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Styrkarsdottir U, Halldorsson BV, Gudbjartsson DF, Tang NL, Koh JM, Xiao SM, et al. European bone mineral density loci are also associated with BMD in East-Asian populations. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13217. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Leupin O, Kramer I, Collette NM, Loots GG, Natt F, Kneissel M, et al. Control of the SOST bone enhancer by PTH using MEF2 transcription factors. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Dec;22(12):1957–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Higashiyama R, Miyaki S, Yamashita S, Yoshitaka T, Lindman G, Ito Y, et al. Correlation between MMP-13 and HDAC7 expression in human knee osteoarthritis. Modern rheumatology / the Japan Rheumatism Association. 2010 Feb;20(1):11–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Lin HS, Hu CY, Chan HY, Liew YY, Huang HP, Lepescheux L, et al. Anti-rheumatic activities of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in vivo in collagen-induced arthritis in rodents. British journal of pharmacology. 2007 Apr;150(7):862–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Tao R, de Zoeten EF, Ozkaynak E, Chen C, Wang L, Porrett PM, et al. Deacetylase inhibition promotes the generation and function of regulatory T cells. Nat Med. 2007 Nov;13(11):1299–307. [PubMed]
62. Shein NA, Grigoriadis N, Alexandrovich AG, Simeonidou C, Lourbopoulos A, Polyzoidou E, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 is neuroprotective, improves functional recovery, and induces glial apoptosis following experimental traumatic brain injury. Faseb J. 2009 Dec;23(12):4266–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Hutt DM, Herman D, Rodrigues AP, Noel S, Pilewski JM, Matteson J, et al. Reduced histone deacetylase 7 activity restores function to misfolded CFTR in cystic fibrosis. Nature chemical biology. 2010 Jan;6(1):25–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Schroeder TM, Westendorf JJ. Histone deacetylase inhibitors promote osteoblast maturation. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Dec;20(12):2254–63. [PubMed]
65. Westendorf JJ. Histone deacetylases in control of skeletogenesis. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2007 Oct 1;102(2):332–40. [PubMed]
66. Yi T, Baek JH, Kim HJ, Choi MH, Seo SB, Ryoo HM, et al. Trichostatin A-mediated upregulation of p21(WAF1) contributes to osteoclast apoptosis. Experimental & molecular medicine. 2007 Apr 30;39(2):213–21. [PubMed]
67. Nakamura T, Kukita T, Shobuike T, Nagata K, Wu Z, Ogawa K, et al. Inhibition of histone deacetylase suppresses osteoclastogenesis and bone destruction by inducing IFN-beta production. J Immunol. 2005 Nov 1;175(9):5809–16. [PubMed]
68. Iwami K, Moriyama T. Effects of short chain fatty acid, sodium butyrate, on osteoblastic cells and osteoclastic cells. The International journal of biochemistry. 1993 Nov;25(11):1631–5. [PubMed]
69. Sheth RD, Wesolowski CA, Jacob JC, Penney S, Hobbs GR, Riggs JE, et al. Effect of carbamazepine and valproate on bone mineral density. The Journal of pediatrics. 1995 Aug;127(2):256–62. [PubMed]
70. Elliott JO, Jacobson MP, Haneef Z. Homocysteine and bone loss in epilepsy. Seizure. 2007 Jan;16(1):22–34. [PubMed]
71. Boluk A, Guzelipek M, Savli H, Temel I, Ozisik HI, Kaygusuz A. The effect of valproate on bone mineral density in adult epileptic patients. Pharmacol Res. 2004 Jul;50(1):93–7. [PubMed]
72. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Fracture risk associated with use of antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia. 2004 Nov;45(11):1330–7. [PubMed]
73. Senn SM, Kantor S, Poulton IJ, Morris MJ, Sims NA, O'Brien TJ, et al. Adverse effects of valproate on bone: Defining a model to investigate the pathophysiology. Epilepsia. 2010 Feb 12; [PubMed]
74. Nissen-Meyer LS, Svalheim S, Tauboll E, Reppe S, Lekva T, Solberg LB, et al. Levetiracetam, phenytoin, and valproate act differently on rat bone mass, structure, and metabolism. Epilepsia. 2007 Oct;48(10):1850–60. [PubMed]
75. Pratap J, Akech J, Wixted JJ, Szabo G, Hussain S, McGee-Lawrence ME, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor, vorinostat, reduces tumor growth at the metastatic bone site and associated osteolysis, but promotes normal bone loss. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010 Dec;9(12):3210–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. McGee-Lawrence ME, McCleary-Wheeler AL, Secreto FJ, Razidlo DF, Zhang M, Stensgard BA, et al. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA; vorinostat) causes bone loss by inhibiting immature osteoblasts. Bone. 2011 Jan 19; [PMC free article] [PubMed]
77. Rahman MM, Kukita A, Kukita T, Shobuike T, Nakamura T, Kohashi O. Two histone deacetylase inhibitors, trichostatin A and sodium butyrate, suppress differentiation into osteoclasts but not into macrophages. Blood. 2003 May 1;101(9):3451–9. [PubMed]
78. Kahnberg P, Lucke AJ, Glenn MP, Boyle GM, Tyndall JD, Parsons PG, et al. Design, synthesis, potency, and cytoselectivity of anticancer agents derived by parallel synthesis from alpha-aminosuberic acid. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2006 Dec 28;49(26):7611–22. [PubMed]
79. Suzuki T, Kouketsu A, Itoh Y, Hisakawa S, Maeda S, Yoshida M, et al. Highly potent and selective histone deacetylase 6 inhibitors designed based on a small-molecular substrate. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2006 Aug 10;49(16):4809–12. [PubMed]
80. Cantley M, Fairlie D, Bartold P, Rainsford K, Le G, Lucke A, et al. Compounds that inhibit histone deacetylases in class I and class II effectively suppress human osteoclasts in vitro. J Cell Physiol. 2011 Feb 22; [PubMed]
81. Pham L, Kaiser B, Romsa A, Schwarz T, Gopalakrishnan R, Jensen ED, et al. HDAC3 and HDAC7 have opposite effects on osteoclast differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2011 Feb 15; [PMC free article] [PubMed]
82. Hubbert C, Guardiola A, Shao R, Kawaguchi Y, Ito A, Nixon A, et al. HDAC6 is a microtubule-associated deacetylase. Nature. 2002 May 23;417(6887):455–8. [PubMed]
83. Matsuyama A, Shimazu T, Sumida Y, Saito A, Yoshimatsu Y, Seigneurin-Berny D, et al. In vivo destabilization of dynamic microtubules by HDAC6-mediated deacetylation. The EMBO journal. 2002 Dec 16;21(24):6820–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
84. Purev E, Neff L, Horne WC, Baron R. c-Cbl and Cbl-b act redundantly to protect osteoclasts from apoptosis and to displace HDAC6 from beta-tubulin, stabilizing microtubules and podosomes. Mol Biol Cell. 2009 Sep;20(18):4021–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
85. Destaing O, Saltel F, Gilquin B, Chabadel A, Khochbin S, Ory S, et al. A novel Rho-mDia2-HDAC6 pathway controls podosome patterning through microtubule acetylation in osteoclasts. Journal of cell science. 2005 Jul 1;118(Pt 13):2901–11. [PubMed]
86. Sato Y, Kondo I, Ishida S, Motooka H, Takayama K, Tomita Y, et al. Decreased bone mass and increased bone turnover with valproate therapy in adults with epilepsy. Neurology. 2001 Aug 14;57(3):445–9. [PubMed]
87. Tsukahara H, Kimura K, Todoroki Y, Ohshima Y, Hiraoka M, Shigematsu Y, et al. Bone mineral status in ambulatory pediatric patients on long-term anti-epileptic drug therapy. Pediatr Int. 2002 Jun;44(3):247–53. [PubMed]
88. Kim SH, Lee JW, Choi KG, Chung HW, Lee HW. A 6-month longitudinal study of bone mineral density with antiepileptic drug monotherapy. Epilepsy Behav. 2007 Mar;10(2):291–5. [PubMed]
89. Pratap J, Dhillon R, Li X, Wixted J, Akech J, Bedard K, et al. The Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, Vorinostat, Blocks Growth and Associated Osteolysis of Cancer Cells Within Bone, but Reduces Bone Volume in Non-Tumor Bearing Bones in Mice. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research [Abstract] 2008 September 15;23(Suppl 1)
90. Haberland M, Carrer M, Mokalled MH, Montgomery RL, Olson EN. Redundant control of adipogenesis by histone deacetylases 1 and 2. J Biol Chem. 2010 May 7;285(19):14663–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Sakata R, Minami S, Sowa Y, Yoshida M, Tamaki T. Trichostatin A activates the osteopontin gene promoter through AP1 site. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Mar 19;315(4):959–63. [PubMed]
92. Cho HH, Park HT, Kim YJ, Bae YC, Suh KT, Jung JS. Induction of osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Cell Biochem. 2005 Oct 15;96(3):533–42. [PubMed]
93. Lee S, Park JR, Seo MS, Roh KH, Park SB, Hwang JW, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors decrease proliferation potential and multilineage differentiation capability of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell proliferation. 2009 Dec;42(6):711–20. [PubMed]
94. Di Bernardo G, Squillaro T, Dell'Aversana C, Miceli M, Cipollaro M, Cascino A, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors promote apoptosis and senescence in human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem cells and development. 2009 May;18(4):573–81. [PubMed]
95. Oner N, Kaya M, Karasalihoglu S, Karaca H, Celtik C, Tutunculer F. Bone mineral metabolism changes in epileptic children receiving valproic acid. Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2004 Aug;40(8):470–3. [PubMed]
96. Rieger-Wettengl G, Tutlewski B, Stabrey A, Rauch F, Herkenrath P, Schauseil-Zipf U, et al. Analysis of the musculoskeletal system in children and adolescents receiving anticonvulsant monotherapy with valproic acid or carbamazepine. Pediatrics. 2001 Dec;108(6):E107. [PubMed]
97. Fuller HR, Man NT, Lam le T, Shamanin VA, Androphy EJ, Morris GE. Valproate and bone loss: iTRAQ proteomics show that valproate reduces collagens and osteonectin in SMA cells. Journal of proteome research. 2010 Aug 6;9(8):4228–33. [PubMed]
98. Xu W, Ngo L, Perez G, Dokmanovic M, Marks PA. Intrinsic apoptotic and thioredoxin pathways in human prostate cancer cell response to histone deacetylase inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17;103(42):15540–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
99. Xu WS, Parmigiani RB, Marks PA. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: molecular mechanisms of action. Oncogene. 2007 Aug 13;26(37):5541–52. [PubMed]
100. Di Renzo F, Broccia ML, Giavini E, Menegola E. VPA-related axial skeletal defects and apoptosis: a proposed event cascade. Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, NY. 2010 Jan;29(1):106–12. [PubMed]
101. Vajda FJ, O'Brien TJ, Hitchcock A, Graham J, Cook M, Lander C, et al. Critical relationship between sodium valproate dose and human teratogenicity: results of the Australian register of anti-epileptic drugs in pregnancy. J Clin Neurosci. 2004 Nov;11(8):854–8. [PubMed]
102. Di Bernardo G, Alessio N, Dell'Aversana C, Casale F, Teti D, Cipollaro M, et al. Impact of histone deacetylase inhibitors SAHA and MS-275 on DNA repair pathways in human mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol. 2010 Nov;225(2):537–44. [PubMed]
103. Guo H, Friedman AD. Phosphorylation of RUNX1 by cyclin-dependent kinase reduces direct interaction with HDAC1 and HDAC3. J Biol Chem. 2011 Jan 7;286(1):208–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Compound
    Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...