• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC Sep 20, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3176658
NIHMSID: NIHMS322983

Second-order selection for evolvability in a large Escherichia coli population

Abstract

In theory, competition between asexual lineages can lead to second-order selection for greater evolutionary potential. To test this hypothesis, we revived a frozen population of Escherichia coli from a long-term evolution experiment and compared the fitness and ultimate fates of four genetically distinct clones. Surprisingly, two clones with beneficial mutations that would eventually take over the population had significantly lower competitive fitness than two clones with mutations that later went extinct. By replaying evolution many times from these clones, we showed that the eventual winners likely prevailed because they had greater potential for further adaptation. Genetic interactions that reduce the benefit of certain regulatory mutations in the eventual losers appear to explain, at least in part, why they were outcompeted.

Keywords: experimental evolution, whole-genome re-sequencing, genetic architecture, clonal interference, epistasis, fitness landscape

Organisms may vary not only in traits that determine their immediate fitness, but also in their potential to generate better-adapted descendants with new beneficial mutations. Evolutionary potential, or evolvability, can be operationally defined as the expected degree to which a lineage beginning from a particular genotype will increase in fitness after evolving for a certain time in a particular environment (1). Evolvability thus reflects a complex probabilistic integration of accessible paths in the fitness landscape influenced by mutation rates, population structure, and epistatic interactions between mutations (2-4). Experiments with microorganisms have shown that genotypes with elevated mutation rates have greater evolvability under certain conditions (5, 6). The evolutionary potential of microorganisms can also vary when the same mutations have different fitness effects in different genetic backgrounds due to epistatic interactions (7-9). The extent to which material differences in evolvability of this latter kind — reflecting genetic architecture (10), rather than mutation rates — spontaneously arise between lineages within asexual populations and play a role in ongoing evolutionary dynamics is unknown (11, 12).

We found that several genetically distinct sub-populations were already present in a 500-generation sample archived from a now >50,000-generation long-term evolution experiment with the bacterium Escherichia coli (13, 14). In particular, we characterized numerous clones sampled at 500, 1000 and 1500 generations for the presence of five previously discovered beneficial mutations (14-18). Specific mutations in the rbs operon and topA, spoT, and glmUS genes fixed in the evolving population between 1000 and 1500 generations, and in pykF after 1500 generations (14). Two beneficial mutations – the ones affecting rbs and topA – were already present in many clones sampled at 500 generations (Table S1). Thus, we refer to topA rbs genotypes sampled at generation 500 as eventual winners (EW) and to other contemporaneous genotypes as eventual losers (EL). Importantly, these genotypes may have other beneficial mutations in these same or other genes, and most such mutations could not have been detected by the assays developed for the known mutations.

We further characterized two clonal isolates of each type: EW1 and EW2, each with the topA and rbs mutations, EL1 with no known mutations, and EL2 with another mutation we call the rbs1 mutation. The EW topA allele is an amino acid substitution in DNA topoisomerase I that alters chromosomal supercoiling, affects the transcription of many genes, and confers a fitness benefit of ~13% when moved into the ancestral genetic background (16). The rbs mutations are deletions of different sizes in the ribose utilization operon that occur with high frequency and cause 1-2% fitness gains (15). Competition experiments against the ancestral strain showed that these four representative clones were 13%–23% more fit than the ancestor (Fig. 1). Thus, the EL, and possibly also the EW, had other beneficial mutations, in addition to those that could be identified by our initial genotyping.

Fig. 1
Fitness of two eventual winner (EW) and two eventual loser (EL) clones relative to the ancestor of the E. coli long-term evolution experiment. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals. All four clones were significantly more fit than the ancestor. Surprisingly, ...

One would naively expect that the EW were better adapted than the EL at 500 generations, but the opposite was true (Fig. 1). Direct competition experiments also showed that the two representative EW clones were at a significant fitness disadvantage relative to the two representative EL clones (Fig. S1). In fact, if the fitness deficit of the EW (−6.3%) had remained constant, they would have gone extinct in another ~350 generations (19). We found no evidence of negative frequency-dependent interactions (20) between EW and EL strains that might have stabilized their continued coexistence in the long-term population (19).

How did descendants of the EW prevail over EL lineages despite their fitness deficit? The EW-derived lineage may have simply been “lucky” in this one instance of evolution; that is, they might have stochastically gained highly beneficial mutations that allowed them to overtake the EL sub-populations before they were driven extinct. Alternately, the EW genotypes may have had a greater potential for further adaptation, such that they would reproducibly give rise to higher fitness descendants and outcompete EL lineages before they were lost. To distinguish between these two hypotheses, we “replayed” evolution by initiating ten replicate experimental populations from each clone isolated at 500 generations (EW1, EW2, EL1, and EL2). Each population was propagated independently under the same conditions as the long-term evolution experiment for 883 generations, approximately as long as EL and EW coexisted in the original population.

To follow the evolutionary dynamics in more detail, these evolution experiments were conducted in a neutral marker divergence format (9, 21, 22). A variant of each of the four E. coli test strains was constructed where the state of a readily scored phenotypic marker (Ara), which has no effect on fitness under these culture conditions, was altered by a specific point mutation (13). Each experimental population was then started by mixing approximately equal numbers of the original test strain (Ara) and the strain with the changed marker (Ara+), with each type grown separately from a single colony to ensure that there was essentially no initial genetic variation within a population and no shared history between independent replicates. Tracking the frequency of this genetic marker in these 40 populations over time allowed us to visually follow and quantitatively analyze the first beneficial mutations that swept to high frequency within each population.

The trajectory for the Ara/Ara+ ratio in each population eventually diverged from its starting level, as bacteria with beneficial mutations linked to one marker state arose and outcompeted their ancestors and competitors with less-beneficial mutations (Fig. 2A-B, S2A-B). The shape of the initial divergence of the family of curves generated from evolutionary replicates of the same clone reflects its local fitness landscape. In particular, a simple model that assumes one category of beneficial mutation, with an effective rate (μ) and fitness benefit (b), reproduces the salient features of these dynamics (21), provided that it includes competition between lineages with alternative beneficial mutations, i.e., clonal interference (2, 23, 24).

Fig 2
Replay evolution experiments to measure the evolvability of the four representative 500- generation clones. (A-B) The frequencies of Ara and Ara+ versions of each test strain, initially mixed equally, were recorded at regular intervals (symbols) ...

By performing population genetic simulations to generate families of curves for many μ and b values (19), we determined the parameter combinations that agreed best with the experimental curves (Fig. 2C). It is clear that the replicate EW marker ratio trajectories diverged earlier and more steeply than the EL trajectories, and that the effective size of the first beneficial mutations to sweep to high frequency was significantly larger for the EW. However, by itself, this first mutation was not sufficient for the EW to overtake the EL. From the 6.3% initial fitness deficit of the EW and the 1.8% larger effect size of their first beneficial mutations, we calculate that, on average, the EW would still be ~4.5% less fit than an EL after the first adaptive step for each type (Fig. 3).

Fig 3
Greater evolvability of EW allows them to reproducibly overtake EL. Two representative EW clones from generation 500 of the long-term evolution experiment were initially at a significant fitness disadvantage relative to two contemporary EL clones (circles). ...

To compare evolvability on a timescale that allows a lineage to accumulate multiple beneficial mutations, we isolated a random clone from each replicate population at the 883-generation endpoint. This evolved clone was either Ara or Ara+. We performed head-to-head competitions of every EL-EW pair with opposite Ara marker states to determine their relative fitness (Fig. S3). We found that, on this timescale, the EW overcame their initial fitness deficit and evolved to higher fitness than the EL by ~2.1%, on average (Fig. 3). Thus, the EW evidently prevailed in the original long-term population because they had greater evolvability. On average, they achieved higher fitness than the EL after each type had equal time to evolve by multiple beneficial-mutation steps from its starting point in the fitness landscape. We stress, however, that this result is necessarily probabilistic in nature. Not every evolved EW clone was able to outcompete every evolved EL clone.

What is the genetic basis of this difference in evolvability? There are three possibilities. First, the EW genetic background may have interacted more favorably with certain potential beneficial mutations than the ancestral background with those same mutations (positive epistasis), thereby opening up additional pathways for adaptive evolution. Conversely, mutations in the EL may have reduced the effects of otherwise beneficial mutations (negative epistasis), thereby closing off some pathways for adaptation. Finally, a mutation in the EW may have caused an elevated mutation rate relative to the EL that would allow the EW to access rarer, more beneficial mutations.

To distinguish the salient genetic differences between the EW and EL, we re-sequenced the genomes of eight evolved E. coli isolates from generation 883 of the replay experiments (19). We chose two strains descended from each of the four 500-generation clones, so that we could reconstruct what mutations were present in the original isolates as well as sample mutations that occurred in their descendants (Fig. 4A). We found that the EW shared only the two known mutations (topA and rbs), and that both EL had two previously unknown base substitutions (topA1 and fadR). Interestingly, the EL topA1 mutation alters the amino acid (isoleucine-34 to serine) directly adjacent to the one changed by the EW topA allele (histidine-33 to tyrosine). FadR is a regulator of fatty acid and acetate metabolism (25), and the effects of this EL mutation are unknown.

Fig 4
(A) Mutations identified by whole-genome re-sequencing of endpoint E. coli clones from the replay evolution experiments and inferred by parsimony in their EW and EL ancestors. Numbers in squares indicate how many mutations accumulated relative to the ...

From 2 to 5 mutations accumulated during the 883-generation replay experiment in the eight independently evolved isolates (Tables S2-S9). There was no evidence that EW had an elevated mutation rate that might have contributed to their greater evolvability. The number of replay-phase mutations in the four evolved EW (16 total) was essentially identical to that in the four evolved EL (15 total). The only mutation in the original 500-generation clones in a gene related to DNA repair or replication (uvrB) was shared by the EL1-derived strains, contrary to the expectation if a change in mutation rate drove the difference in evolvability.

It is very likely that most of the 31 observed mutations that occurred during the replay experiments are beneficial. The rate of genomic change due to adaptive evolution greatly exceeds the rate of neutral drift in this system, and mutations in some of the same genes, operons, and pathways have been found in other isolates from the long-term experiment (14, 26). Two genes independently evolved mutations in more than one of the sequenced 883-generation EL- and EW-derived strains (Fig. 4A). Seven of the eight sequenced clones from the replays evolved mutations in pykF, which encodes the metabolic enzyme pyruvate kinase. In the original long-term population, pykF mutations were detected in EW by 1500 generations (Table S1) and in rbs1 EL by 1000 generations (19). The long-term EW pykF mutation is highly beneficial in this environment (14), and all 12 long-term populations substituted pykF mutations by 20,000 generations (27). Two of the sequenced replay clones had point mutations in spoT, which encodes a bifunctional (p)ppGpp synthesis and degradation enzyme that is a global regulator of gene expression. The next mutation found in the long-term EW lineage, after rbs and topA, was also a spoT base substitution (Table S1). This spoT mutation has been shown to affect the transcription of numerous genes and to confer a fitness benefit of ~9% when moved into the ancestral strain background (17, 28).

We observed pykF mutations in both EW- and EL-derived strains. However, all spoT mutations arose in EW-derived lines (Fig. 4A). This association with genetic background raised the possibility that spoT mutations might be involved in epistatic interactions that underlie differences in EW–EL evolvability, especially given the potential for widespread pleiotropic effects caused by mutations in this global regulator (29). To increase the statistical power for detecting an association, we sequenced the complete spoT reading frame in all 40 EW and EL endpoint clones isolated from the replay experiments. We found spoT mutations in 6 of the 20 evolved EW clones (Table S10). Strikingly, we found no spoT mutations in the 20 EL clones, a difference unlikely by chance (two-tailed Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.0202).

To test directly for epistatic interactions, we measured the fitness effects of adding the spoT allele that arose during the long-term experiment to the EW2 and EL1 strain backgrounds. We found that this spoT allele confers a large fitness benefit in the EW background, but has no significant effect in the EL background (Fig. 4B). Because changes in chromosomal supercoiling also may have widespread pleiotropic effects, it seemed likely that interactions with the topA alleles specific to the EW and EL backgrounds might explain these epistatic effects. To test this hypothesis, we constructed otherwise isogenic strains carrying only the EW topA or EL topA1 alleles on the ancestral background, and then measured the fitness effects of adding the spoT mutation that arose during the long-term experiment to each strain (Fig. 4C). The EL topA1 allele is beneficial on its own, though less so than the EW topA mutation. The spoT mutation is also highly beneficial on its own and has essentially the same fitness effect in the presence of the EW topA allele. By contrast, this spoT mutation is neutral, or at least much less beneficial, in combination with the EL topA1 mutation.

These results therefore support the hypothesis of negative epistasis between the EL and later mutations in spoT, and they contradict the hypothesis of positive epistasis between the EW and that spoT allele. Highly beneficial spoT mutations are evidently at the leading edge of the adaptive mutations that are accessible to the EW sub-population, which is why they often evolve in this background. The alternative topA1 mutation that arose in the EL sub-population evidently renders those spoT mutations neutral, leaving other less-beneficial mutations the best available. In essence, the EL followed a trajectory in the fitness landscape that allowed more rapid improvement early on, but which shut the door on at least one important avenue for further improvement. By contrast, the EW followed a path that did not preclude this option, giving them a better than otherwise expected chance of overtaking the EL. Because spoT mutations evolved in only 6 of the 20 EW replays, and because it took multiple mutations for the EW to overtake the EL, it is likely that epistatic interactions with other beneficial mutations also contributed to their differences in evolutionary potential.

We have demonstrated in detail a case in which epistatic interactions between beneficial mutations caused differences in bacterial evolvability that appear to have played a pivotal role in the evolution of a population. Similar cases are expected in any population of asexual organisms that evolve on a rugged fitness landscape with substantial epistasis, as long as the population is large enough that multiple beneficial mutations accumulate in contending lineages before any one mutation can sweep to fixation (2, 11, 22-24, 30). This scenario thus provides a general mechanism for the evolution of evolvability by “second-order selection” (3) on genetic architecture. Our results also suggest that studying the interactions among regulatory networks could lead to a deeper understanding of how genetic changes in those networks might either promote or impede evolvability at a systems level.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NSF (DEB1019989 to R.E.L.), DARPA (HR0011-09-1-0055 to R.E.L. and T.F.C), the NIH (K99GM087550 to J.E.B.), and the McDonnell Foundation (220020174 to T.F.C). We thank N. Hajela for laboratory assistance, staff at the MSU Research Technology Support Facility for assistance with genome sequencing, and the MSU High-Performance Computing Cluster for computational support.

Footnotes

This manuscript has been accepted for publication in Science. This version has not undergone final editing. Please refer to the complete version of record at http://www.sciencemag.org/. The manuscript may not be reproduced or used in any manner that does not fall within the fair use provisions of the Copyright Act without the prior, written permission of AAAS.

References and Notes

1. Pigliucci M. Is evolvability evolvable? Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008;9:75. [PubMed]
2. Fogle CA, Nagle JL, Desai MM. Clonal interference, multiple mutations and adaptation in large asexual populations. Genetics. 2008;180:2163. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Tenaillon O, Toupance B, Le Nagard H, Taddei F, Godelle B. Mutators, population size, adaptive landscape and the adaptation of asexual populations of bacteria. Genetics. 1999;152:485. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Weinreich DM, Watson RA, Chao L. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution. 2005;59:1165. [PubMed]
5. Chao L, Cox EC. Competition between high and low mutating strains of Escherichia coli. Evolution. 1983;37:125.
6. de Visser JAGM, Zeyl CW, Gerrish PJ, Blanchard JL, Lenski RE. Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. Science. 1999;283:404. [PubMed]
7. Burch CL, Chao L. Evolvability of an RNA virus is determined by its mutational neighbourhood. Nature. 2000;406:625. [PubMed]
8. McBride RC, Ogbunugafor CB, Turner PE. Robustness promotes evolvability of thermotolerance in an RNA virus. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008;8:231. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Barrick JE, Kauth MR, Strelioff CC, Lenski RE. Escherichia coli rpoB mutants have increased evolvability in proportion to their fitness defects. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010;27:1338. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Hansen TF. The evolution of genetic architecture. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006;37:123.
11. Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ. Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2010;365:1255. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Colegrave N, Collins S. Experimental evolution: experimental evolution and evolvability. Heredity. 2008;100:464. [PubMed]
13. Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC, Tadler SC. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am. Nat. 1991;138:1315.
14. Barrick JE, et al. Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Nature. 2009;461:1243. [PubMed]
15. Cooper VS, Schneider D, Blot M, Lenski RE. Mechanisms causing rapid and parallel losses of ribose catabolism in evolving populations of Escherichia coli B. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:2834. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Crozat E, Philippe N, Lenski RE, Geiselmann J, Schneider D. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. XII. DNA topology as a key target of selection. Genetics. 2005;169:523. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Cooper TF, Rozen DE, Lenski RE. Parallel changes in gene expression after 20,000 generations of evolution in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003;100:1072. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Stanek MT, Cooper TF, Lenski RE. Identification and dynamics of a beneficial mutation in a long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009;9:302. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
20. Elena SF, Lenski RE. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. VII. Mechanisms maintaining genetic variability within populations. Evolution. 1997;51:1058.
21. Hegreness M, Shoresh N, Hartl D, Kishony R. An equivalence principle for the incorporation of favorable mutations in asexual populations. Science. 2006;311:1615. [PubMed]
22. Kao KC, Sherlock G. Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:1499. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Gerrish PJ, Lenski RE. The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica. 1998;102/103:127. [PubMed]
24. Park SC, Krug J. Clonal interference in large populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007;104:18135. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Xu Y, Heath RJ, Li Z, Rock CO, White SW. The FadR•DNA complex: transcriptional control of fatty acid metabolism in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:17373. [PubMed]
26. Barrick JE, Lenski RE. Genome-wide mutational diversity in an evolving population of Escherichia coli. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 2009;74:119. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Woods R, Schneider D, Winkworth CL, Riley MA, Lenski RE. Tests of parallel molecular evolution in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006;103:9107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Cooper TF, Remold SK, Lenski RE, Schneider D. Expression profiles reveal parallel evolution of epistatic interactions involving the CRP regulon in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Philippe N, Crozat E, Lenski RE, Schneider D. Evolution of global regulatory networks during a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Bioessays. 2007;29:846. [PubMed]
30. Rozen DE, Habets MG, Handel A, de Visser JA. Heterogeneous adaptive trajectories of small populations on complex fitness landscapes. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1715. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. da Silva J, Coetzer M, Nedellec R, Pastore C, Mosier DE. Fitness epistasis and constraints on adaptation in a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protein region. Genetics. 2010;185:293. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...