![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 1999, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochores by the type 1 phosphatase Glc7p 1Cell Biology Program, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany; 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK; 3Department of Biology 68-371, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 USA Received October 2, 1998; Accepted January 13, 1999. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract We have investigated the role of protein phosphorylation in regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochores. By use of phosphatase inhibitors and a type 1 protein phosphatase mutant (glc7-10), we show that the microtubule binding activity, but not the centromeric DNA-binding activity, of the kinetochore complex is regulated by a balance between a protein kinase and the type 1 protein phosphatase (PP1) encoded by the GLC7 gene. glc7-10 mutant cells exhibit low kinetochore-microtubule binding activity in vitro and a high frequency of chromosome loss in vivo. Specifically, the Ndc10p component of the centromere DNA-binding CBF3 complex is altered by the glc7-10 mutation; Ndc10p is hyperphosphorylated in glc7-10 extracts. Furthermore, addition of recombinant Ndc10p reconstitutes the microtubule-binding activity of a glc7-10 extract to wild-type levels. Finally, the glc7-10-induced mitotic arrest is abolished in spindle checkpoint mutants, suggesting that defects in kinetochore–microtubule interactions caused by hyperphosphorylation of kinetochore proteins activate the spindle checkpoint. Keywords: Checkpoint, kinetochore, mitosis, type 1 protein phosphatase One of the most important events in eukaryotic cell division is the faithful segregation of chromosomes to the two daughter cells. Chromosome segregation is mediated in large part by kinetochores, DNA–protein complexes that assemble on centromeric DNA and bind to microtubules of the mitotic spindle. Sister chromatid pairs make bipolar attachments to the spindle, with one chromatid bound to microtubules from one pole and the other chromatid bound to microtubules from the opposite pole. Once both kinetochores of each chromosome have established proper microtubule attachment, anaphase is triggered: Sister chromatids disjoin and move toward opposite spindle poles. Ensuring the faithful execution of this process requires tight regulation of the assembly, microtubule-binding properties, and motility of kinetochores. As yet, little is known about the mechanisms that control these important processes. Evidence from several organisms suggests that type 1 protein phosphatases (PP1) are required for chromosome segregation. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the catalytic subunit of PP1 is encoded by a single essential gene GLC7. Glc7p mutants arrest before anaphase onset with replicated DNA, short spindles, and high levels of Cdc28p kinase activity (Hisamoto et al. 1994; Black et al. 1995; MacKelvie et al. 1995). In the distantly related fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, sds21 dis2 double mutant cells carrying loss-of-function mutations in both of the genes encoding catalytic PP1 subunits, also arrest in mitosis at the restrictive temperature, and have short metaphase spindles and condensed and unseparated chromosomes (Ohkura et al. 1988, 1989; Ishii et al. 1996). Similarly, in Aspergillus nidulans, BimG (PP1) mutants at the restrictive temperature are blocked in mitosis with condensed chromosomes and short metaphase spindles (Doonan and Morris 1989). In Drosophila melanogaster, mutations in one of the four genes encoding PP1 isoenzymes result in overcondensed chromosomes, and no elongated anaphase spindles (Axton et al. 1990). Finally, experiments in mammalian cells have shown that the microinjection of anti-PP1 antibodies causes cells to arrest their division at metaphase (Fernandez et al. 1992). These data show that PP1 function is essential for the onset of anaphase and for correct chromosome segregation in a wide variety of eukaryotes. The reasons for the mitotic arrest are unknown. One possibility is that in the absence of PP1, kinetochores are incorrectly assembled or regulated, thereby triggering the spindle checkpoint that monitors the attachment of kinetochores to microtubules and prevents cell cycle progression to anaphase when attachment is defective (for review, see Wells 1996; Hardwick 1998). In S. cerevisiae, centromeric sequences are well conserved among all 16 chromosomes and are composed of three elements, CDEI, CDEII, and CDEIII (Clarke and Carbon 1980; Fitzgerald et al. 1982; Hegemann and Fleig 1993). Point mutations in the highly conserved central bases of CDEIII inactivate the centromere in vivo, showing that CDEIII plays a critical role in kinetochore function (McGrew et al. 1986; Ng and Carbon 1987). CDEIII is bound by CBF3, a complex consisting of four proteins, Skp1p (23 kD), Ctf13p (58 kD), Cep3p (64 kD), and Ndc10p (110 kD) all of which are necessary for DNA-binding activity and for cell viability (for review, see Hyman and Sorger 1995; Clarke 1998). Previously, we described a method to partially reassemble yeast kinetochores on centromeric DNA in vitro and measure the binding of these centromere complexes to microtubules (Sorger et al. 1994). This assay established that CBF3 plays an obligate, though not sufficient role in the microtubule-binding activity of kinetochores. However, the molecular nature of this microtubule-binding activity and how it is regulated is unclear to date. Here, we report that PP1 regulates the attachment of kinetochores to microtubules in S. cerevisiae. Budding yeast contain a single PP1 catalytic subunit, Glc7p. Kinetochores reconstituted in vitro from Glc7p mutant cell extracts have reduced microtubule binding relative to those reconstituted from wild-type extracts. CEN DNA binding by the CBF3 protein complex is identical in Glc7p mutant and wild-type extracts, suggesting that Glc7p specifically regulates the microtubule-binding activity of kinetochores. Kinetochore microtubule binding in Glc7p mutant extracts is restored to wild-type levels by addition of recombinant Ndc10p but not Cep3p or Ctf13p–Skp1p, suggesting that Ndc10p is the target of the Glc7p pathway in budding yeast. These results suggest that the mitotic arrest of Glc7p mutants is triggered by defective kinetochore–microtubules interactions. Results Microtubule binding by kinetochore complexes is regulated by phosphorylation To investigate the role of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in the regulation of kinetochore activity, we added ATP to the in vitro microtubule binding assay for reconstituted yeast kinetochores (Sorger et al. 1994). This assay consists of reassembling kinetochore complexes on centromeric DNA linked to fluorescent latex beads by incubation in a yeast extract. Then, the beads are incubated with taxol-stabilized microtubules and bead–microtubule interactions are monitored by fluorescence microscopy. In extracts from wild-type cells, we observed high levels of bead binding, corresponding to reconstitution of ~10%–20% of the kinetochores present in the starting culture. Using a luciferase assay, we determined that the concentration of ATP in these reactions was <0.1 μm, a concentration insufficient for kinases to phosphorylate their substrates. When ATP was added to extracts to a final concentration of 1 mm, the number of beads bound to microtubules decreased approximately threefold (Fig. (Fig.1A).1
To determine the type of phosphatase involved in the ATP-dependent regulation of microtubule-binding activity, we added two different phosphatase inhibitors. Microcystin-LR (Runnegar et al. 1995) is a potent inhibitor of PP1 and PP2A, whereas okadaic acid at low concentration is a selective inhibitor of PP2A (Zhang et al. 1994). When microcystin-LR and ATP were added simultaneously to reactions, microtubule-binding activity was reduced 15-fold relative to untreated reactions. The subsequent addition of apyrase to the microcystin and ATP-treated reactions did not restore activity (Fig. (Fig.1A).1 Next, we asked whether ATP was regulating the DNA-binding activity of CBF3 or some other aspect of kinetochore formation. The binding of CBF3 to DNA was measured by incubation of extracts with radiolabeled CDEIII–DNA (Sorger et al. 1995) and then testing of CBF3–CDEIII complex formation with a bandshift assay. We observed that the addition of ATP to CDEIII-binding reactions, with or without either microcystin or okadaic acid, did not alter the amount of DNA-bound CBF3 (Fig. (Fig.1B).1 Reduced microtubule-binding activity in a PP1 mutant To test directly whether PP1 regulates microtubule binding by kinetochore complexes, we assayed extracts from cells carrying a mutation in the unique PP1 catalytic subunit GLC7. One temperature-sensitive allele of GLC7, glc7-10, exhibits a G2/M arrest at the restrictive temperature (P.D. Andrews and M.J.R. Stark, in prep.). Following the shift of glc7-10 to 37°C, the majority of cells exhibit a large budded phenotype with an elongated bud, show a short mitotic spindle with poor tubulin staining, and have their nucleus positioned at the bud neck. These phenotypes are consistent with a defect in kinetochore function. We prepared extracts from glc7-10 mutant cells grown at the permissive temperature and at the nonpermissive temperature, and observed three- to sixfold lower microtubule-binding activity in both extracts compared with congenic wild-type extracts (Fig. (Fig.2A).2
To know whether the decrease in microtubule-binding activity was specific for glc7-10 allele, we assayed the kinetochore–microtubule binding activity of a glc7-1 mutant extract. glc7-1 cells are defective in glycogen synthesis (Cannon et al. 1994). This extract does not show any defect in our in vitro assay (data not shown), suggesting that the lack of microtubule-binding activity in glc7-10 mutant is likely to be specific for mitotic alleles of GLC7. To determine whether microtubule binding was also decreased in PP2A mutants, we examined cells carrying temperature-sensitive mutations in PP2A genes (Evans and Stark 1997). S. cerevisiae contains two PP2A catalytic subunits encoded by the PPH21 and PPH22 genes. Mutations in either pph21 or pph22 block cells in mitosis, although pph21 mutants eventually proceed through a round of aberrant chromosome segregation (Evans and Stark 1997). No significant differences in microtubule-binding activity between wild-type and PP2A mutant cells were observed (D.R.H. Evans, I. Sassoon, P.D. Andrews, A.A. Hyman, and M.J.R. Stark, in prep.). Taken together, these results suggest that Glc7p is part of a kinase–phosphatase balance that regulates the microtubule binding activity of kinetochores. In vivo evidence for Glc7p function in chromosome segregation We wanted to relate the observation that glc7-10 cells have reduced microtubule-binding activity in vitro with their in vivo mitotic phenotype. To test this relationship, we determined whether glc7-10 mutants had an increased frequency of chromosome loss. We visualized the mitotic stability of an artificial chromosome containing the SUP11 marker, using the red/white sectoring assay (see Materials and Methods) at permissive and semipermissive temperature (Fig. (Fig.3A,B).3
A defect in kinetochore–microtubule interaction has been proposed to activate the spindle checkpoint and delay the onset of anaphase (for review, see Wells 1996). Thus, the G2/M arrest in a glc7-10 mutant could result from kinetochore defects, triggering the spindle checkpoint. To test this possibility, we generated double mutants between glc7-10 and mutants preventing checkpoint activation. First, we constructed a double mutant containing glc7-10 and either ndc10-1 (Goh and Kilmartin 1993) or ndc10-42 (Doheny et al. 1993). As mentioned above, glc7-10 cells arrest in mid-mitosis. In contrast, ndc10-1 cells do not arrest but exhibit polyploidy (Goh and Kilmartin 1993). This later finding is surprising, as one might expect that a cell with defective kinetochores would arrest as a consequence of engaging the mitotic checkpoint (Spencer and Hieter 1992; Pangilinan and Spencer 1996; Wells and Murray 1996; Wang and Burke 1997). An attractive explanation is that in ndc10-1 mutants, kinetochores are sufficiently impaired at the restrictive temperature that they can neither bind microtubules nor activate the checkpoint. We generated synchronous cultures of the glc7-10 ndc10-1 double mutants by releasing cells arrested at G1/G0 by nutritional deprivation into fresh medium at 37°C and analyzed the DNA content of cells at different time points using flow cytometry (FACS). As expected, glc7-10 cells primarily contained 2C DNA, indicative of a G2/M arrest (Fig. (Fig.4A,b).4
One of the genes required for the spindle checkpoint in yeast is MAD2 (Li and Murray 1991). In the absence of MAD2, the kinetochore-dependent arrest of cells containing unattached chromosomes is abolished (Wang and Burke 1997). Therefore, we tested whether deletions in MAD2 would also bypass the glc7-10-dependent mitotic arrest. We isolated glc7-10 mad2Δ double mutant G1 cells by centrifugal elutriation, released them at restrictive temperature, and analyzed their DNA content by flow cytometry (Fig. (Fig.4B).4 To confirm this result, we plated single G0 cells coming from stationary phase and observed division patterns of single cells at 37°C. In the glc7-10 mutant, 89% of the cells arrested at the first mitosis and the other 11% arrested at the next mitosis (Fig. (Fig.5).5
Ndc10p is hyperphosphorylated in glc7-10 extracts Next, we asked why glc7-10 extracts had low microtubule binding activity compared with wild-type extracts. One possibility was that the levels of CBF3 complex proteins may be lower in glc7-10 cells than in wild-type cells. Therefore, we compared the amounts of Ndc10p, Skp1p, and Cep3p by immunoblotting in wild-type and glc7-10 extracts (Fig. (Fig.6A).6
Does Ndc10p hyperphosphorylation impair the binding of CBF3 to CEN-DNA? To address this question, we measured the CDEIII-binding activity of CBF3 in wild-type and glc7-10 extracts from cells grown at both permissive and restrictive temperatures and found that the band shift intensities were similar (Fig. (Fig.7A).7
The addition of Ndc10p to glc7-10 extracts reconstitutes its microtubule-binding activity To test directly whether Ndc10p hyperphosphorylation is responsible for the low microtubule-binding activity of glc7-10 extracts, we added fractionated lysates from insect cells expressing recombinant Ndc10p, Cep3p, or Ctf13p–Skp1p as described (Kaplan et al. 1997). It has been shown previously that these four proteins are necessary and sufficient to assemble functional CBF3 (Lechner and Carbon 1991; Kaplan et al. 1997). The association among CBF3 subunits is weak in the absence of centromeric DNA: When recombinant CBF3 subunits are added to yeast cell extracts, mixed complexes can form that contain both recombinant and native subunits (Grancell and Sorger, unpubl.). When recombinant CBF3 subunits were added to glc7-10 extracts, we observed that Ndc10p, but not Cep3p or Ctf13p–Skp1p, restored microtubule-binding activity to wild-type levels (Fig. (Fig.7B).7 Discussion In this report we examine the role of protein phosphorylation in regulating the activity of S. cerevisiae kinetochores. Using an in vitro system in which kinetochore–microtubule binding can be reconstituted in cell extracts, we show that this association is stimulated by a type 1 protein phosphatase and inhibited by an opposing kinase activity. We found that phosphorylation alters the ability of the essential centromere-binding complex CBF3 to mediate microtubule attachment, but that it does not alter its ability to bind to DNA. The component of CBF3 subject to regulation by the Glc7p phosphatase pathway seems to be Ndc10p, because this protein is hyperphosphorylated in the glc7-10 mutant. As glc7-10 arrest is mediated by the spindle checkpoint, it is possible that a change in Ndc10p phosphorylation is able to generate a checkpoint-dependent arrest. Regulation of centromere–microtubule attachment by Glc7p We used ATP and apyrase additions to show that phosphorylation regulates the microtubule-binding activity of yeast kinetochores in vitro. The use of microcystin at a concentration sufficient to inhibit PP1 and PP2A, and the use of okadaic acid at a concentration sufficient to inhibit only PP2A allowed us to conclude that PP1 promotes microtubule-binding activity of kinetochores in our in vitro assay. Furthermore, PP1 mutant extracts but not PP2A mutant extracts show low microtubule-binding activity in the same assay, supporting the hypothesis that PP1 activates kinetochore–microtubule attachment. Altogether, these findings can be explained by postulating that microtubule-binding activity is regulated by phosphorylation and that the ratio of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated kinetochore proteins is controlled by the competing actions of a protein kinase and a type 1 protein phosphatase. The decrease in microtubule-binding activity on ATP addition is in agreement with previous experiments analyzing binding of minichromosomes to taxol-stabilized microtubules (Kingsbury and Koshland 1993). Ndc10p is a downstream substrate of the Glc7p phosphatase pathway What substrate of Glc7p regulates kinetochore activity? Our data show that the kinetochore protein Ndc10p is hyperphosphorylated in the glc7-10 mutant extracts. This hyperphosphorylation appears to be correlated with the low microtubule-binding activity of kinetochore complexes observed in glc7-10 extracts because the addition of recombinant Ndc10p, but not other CBF3 subunits, restores microtubule-binding activity to wild-type levels. Although these data do not show that Ndc10p is a direct target of Glc7p, they define a regulatory pathway acting on kinetochores via Ndc10p. This pathway includes Glc7p and a kinase, both upstream from Ndc10p, which regulate kinetochore–microtubule attachment by phosphorylation. A potential kinase is the essential Ipl1 Ser/Thr protein kinase (Chan and Botstein 1993), which genetically counteracts Glc7p (Francisco et al. 1994) and has been shown to phosphorylate Ndc10p in vitro. Consistent with Ipl1p counteracting the Glc7p pathway on kinetochore activity, ipl1 mutant extracts are not sensitive to ATP addition in our in vitro kinetochore–microtubule-binding assay (Biggins et al. 1999). Interestingly, Ndc10p hyperphosphorylation is deleterious for the microtubule-binding activity of kinetochores but does not impair the binding of CBF3 to centromeric DNA. Thus, Ndc10p has two independently regulated functions in kinetochores: The first function is to bind to centromeric DNA, the second function is to participate in mediating the assembly of a microtubule attachment site. Only the second function is regulated by Glc7p. We know little about how CBF3 mediates microtubule attachment. CBF3 alone does not bind to microtubules (Sorger et al. 1994) but does associate with additional cellular factors, at least one of which can be purified from extracts (K.B. Kaplan, F.F. Severin, A.A. Hyman, and P.K. Sorger, in prep.), to link centromeric DNA to microtubules in vitro. Thus, it seems likely that Glc7p acts to remove the phosphorylated epitopes of Ndc10p that are inhibitory for its association with microtubule-binding proteins. What is the role of phosphorylation of Ndc10p in the wild-type cell? Previous experiments have shown that the binding of CBF3 to CDEIII does not vary through the vegetative cell cycle, but that microtubule-binding activity is low in G1, higher in S phase and reaches maximal levels at mitosis (I. Sassoon and A.A. Hyman, unpubl.). One explanation is that these changes in microtubule binding are derived from cell-cycle dependent changes in Ndc10p phosphorylation mediated, in part, by Glc7p. Ndc10p, Glc7p, and the spindle checkpoint We found that glc7-10 arrest at the G2/M transition is mediated by the spindle checkpoint, because glc7-10 ndc10-1, glc7-10 mad2Δ, and glc7-10 bub2Δ do not arrest at mitosis. Why do glc7-10 cells trigger the spindle assembly checkpoint? One possibility is that Glc7p has a role in control of spindle assembly, for instance by controlling microtubule organization. Defects in microtubule organization can trigger a spindle checkpoint-dependent arrest. Another possibility is that the spindle checkpoint proteins can sense the hyperphosphorylation of Ndc10p and activate a signaling cascade to stop the cell cycle at the metaphase–anaphase transition. Although we understand some of the downstream pathways required for the spindle checkpoint, we have no idea as to how kinetochores actually sense microtubule attachment. Perhaps the Glc7p-dependent phosphorylation state of Ndc10p plays a role in sensing microtubule attachment. We cannot yet distinguish between these possibilities, which will require the mapping of the Ndc10p phosphorylation sites, but it is interesting to note that in a glc7-10 mad2Δ double mutant, the cells can divide for several generations, suggesting that there are no gross defects in spindle organization in glc7-10 mutants. A general role for PP1 in mitosis In all eukaryotes in which genetic analysis has been performed, mutations in type 1 protein phosphatase generate a mitotic arrest, and as shown in this study and others (Hisamoto et al. 1994), these mutations decrease the fidelity of mitotic chromosome segregation at permissive temperatures. However, the critical mitotic substrates for PP1 have not been identified. In S. pombe, a genetic interaction between PP1 and components of the APC has been detected, suggesting that APC could be activated by PP1 (Yamada et al. 1997). However, results in Xenopus egg extracts do not support a role of PP1 in the direct activation of APC (Vorlaufer and Peters 1998). Our results suggest that PP1 is required for correct kinetochore assembly in S. cerevisiae (see model in Fig. Fig.8).8
Materials and methods Yeast strains All strains used in this study are summarized in Table 1. In all cases, the background is W303A.
Reagents BSA, nocodazole, α factor, propidium iodide, okadaic acid, microcystin, taxol, apyrase, and cytohelicase were purchased from Sigma. PMSF, high concentration alkaline phosphatase, and ATP were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim. Restriction enzymes and buffers were purchased from New England Biolabs. Bovine brain tubulin was prepared in house (Ashford et al. 1998). ECL+ Kit and secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse IgGs conjugated with horse radish peroxidase were purchased from Amersham. General yeast methods and DNA manipulations All yeast growth medium (rich medium, minimal medium, and sporulation medium) and general yeast methods are described in Rose et al. (1990). Yeast strains were transformed by the lithium acetate procedure as described by Ito et al. (1983). General molecular biology methods were carried out as described by Sambrook et al. (1989). One-step gene disruption was performed by the method of Langle-Rouault (Langle and Jacobs 1995). Verification of the disruption was confirmed by PCR with appropriate primers. Chromosome loss assay Yeast cells carrying ade2 ochre mutations accumulate a read pigment, the appearance of which is suppressed by a single copy of the ochre suppressor gene SUP11. The ade2 strain K5043 contains SUP11 on a nonessential chromosome fragment and produces white colonies, allowing chromosome loss to be scored by the appearance of red sectors during colony development (Spencer et al. 1990). The SUP11 chromosome fragment was transferred into the mutant glc7-10 and control GLC7 backgrounds by crossing K5043 with PAY700-4 and PAY700-1, respectively, identifying spores that germinated to give Trp+ Leu+ Ura+ colonies following sporulation and tetrad dissection. Loss of the SUP11 chromosome fragment was monitored visually after 7 days by the production of red sectors following growth of the strains on YPD plates lacking supplementary adenine at 26°C and 35.5°C. Yeast cultures and extracts preparation Yeast temperature-sensitive cells were grown at 26°C (permissive temperature) to a density of 2–5 × 107 cells/ml. Whole-cell extracts were prepared by centrifugation of the culture 4 min at 4000 rpm and at 4°C in a J6-B centrifuge (Beckman) and washing once in water at 4°C [in a 50-ml Falcon tube in a megafuge 10R (Heraeus)]. The pellet was then weighed and resuspended in the same weight of breakage buffer 2× [200 mm β-glycerophosphate, 100 mm bis-Tris-propane (pH 7.0), 400 mm KCl, 10 mm EDTA, 10 mm EGTA, 20% glycerol, 4°C] with protease inhibitors (final concentrations: 1 mm PMSF and 10 μg/ml each pepstatin, leupeptin, and chymostatin). The cell paste obtained was then dripped in a 50-ml Falcon tube filled with liquid nitrogen. The frozen paste was pulverized with a porcelain mortar (Coors 60322, 13.5 cm O.D.) and pestle cooled in liquid nitrogen (~300 strokes are required to obtain a very fine powder and to fragment >50% of the cells). The efficiency of breakage was monitored by examination of the cells by phase-contrast microscopy. The powder was then thawed on ice and cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. Typical protein concentrations in the extracts were 10–40 mg/ml. In extracts prepared in this manner, the ATP concentration (determined by luciferase luciferin) was <1 μm for an extract prepared at 20 mg/ml. The extracts were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70°C for several months. Alkaline phosphatase treatment of extracts was performed with Boehringer Mannheim high concentration alkaline phosphatase (1 U/μl) and incubation at 37°C for 15 min.Band-shift assay The DNA probe used for this experiment consisted of 89 bp derived from the centromeric sequence of chromosome III of S. cerevisiae (Espelin et al. 1997). The probe was radiolabeled (Sorger et al. 1995), gels were prepared (Lechner and Carbon 1991), and band-shift reactions were performed (Sorger et al. 1995) essentially as described. Microtubule-binding assay The microtubule-binding assay has been described previously (Sorger et al. 1994). Typically, we use a 30-μl reaction containing 50–80 μg of extract with 3 × 107 beads and 10 μg of sonicated salmon sperm DNA in kinetochore buffer [10 mm HEPES (pH 8), 6 mm MgCl2, 10% glycerol] and adjusted to a final KCl concentration of 140 mm. For the experiment involving inhibitors of phosphatases, ATP was added at 1 mm, microcystin was added at 1 μm, okadaic acid was added at 0.1 μm (parallel experiments involving okadaic acid titration confirmed that 0.1 μm was sufficient to inhibit only type 2A protein phosphatases), and apyrase was added for 5 min at 1 U/μl after the 40-min incubation. Microtubule-bound beads were counted manually, 10–20 fields were averaged, and standard deviations and the mean calculated.Flow cytometry analysis Small unbudded G1 cells were isolated by centrifugal elutriation, performed as described previously (Schwob and Nasmyth 1993). Cells were grown overnight on YPRaffinose and small G1 cells were released into YPD at 37°C. Samples were processed for flow cytometry analysis as described previously (Schwob and Nasmyth 1993). Production of yeast proteins in baculovirus CBF3 subunits were produced in baculovirus insect cells as described previously (Kaplan et al. 1997). Each protein was purified and was able to complement its corresponding extract for DNA binding and microtubule-binding activity (Espelin et al. 1997; Kaplan et al. 1997). Ndc10p produced in insect cells is extensively phosphorylated as measured by in vivo 32P labeling. Bacterially produced Ndc10p, or alkaline phosphatase-treated baculovirus-produced Ndc10p are incapable of CBF3 complex formation (K.B. Kaplan, unpubl.). Antibody production The plasmid pGEX–GST–NDC10 was kindly provided by J. Kilmartin (Medical Research Council, Cambridge, UK). It contains the carboxy-terminal part of the NDC10 gene (amino-acids 679–894). It was transformed into BL21 bacteria and the GST–Ndc10p was renatured, purified over a GST column, and injected into rabbits. The sera obtained were subsequently purified over a GST–Ndc10p column and stored in 50% glycerol at −20°C. Small peptides suitable for raising antisera were chosen by computer analysis of the sequences of the Cep3p, Skp1p, and Glc7p proteins, synthesized, conjugated to carrier proteins (Imject Activated Immunogen Conjugation kits, Pierce, 77107-8) and injected into rabbits. The sera obtained were purified with the peptides coupled to a column (Sulfolink coupling gel, Pierce 20401-2). The purified antibodies were stored at −20°C in 50% glycerol. Acknowledgments We thank J. Kilmartin for kindly providing the Ndc10p antibodies and the GST–NDC10 plasmid, S. Piatti for providing the c-myc-tagged NDC10 strain, A. Tóth for the BUB2 disruption oligonucleotides, A. Atzberger for technical assistance with the FACS Scan, M. Glotzer, A. Murray, and K. Nasmyth for helpful discussions, and A. Deshai, C. Echeverri, A. Murray, S. Schuyler, and R. Tournebize for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was carried out with support from the Wellcome Trust to M.J.R.S. (project grants 046956 and 049778). This work was supported by a Leukemia Society Special Fellowship to K.B.K and by the Searle Scholars Program, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (travel grant CRG.960163) and by National Institutes of Health grant R01-GM51464. Footnotes 4Corresponding author. E-MAIL hyman/at/embl-heidelberg.de; FAX 49 6221 387 512. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mol Cell Biol. 1994 May; 14(5):3158-65.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1994]Yeast. 1995 Jun 30; 11(8):747-59.
[Yeast. 1995]Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jul; 15(7):3777-85.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1995]EMBO J. 1988 May; 7(5):1465-73.
[EMBO J. 1988]Cell. 1989 Jun 16; 57(6):997-1007.
[Cell. 1989]Nature. 1980 Oct 9; 287(5782):504-9.
[Nature. 1980]Cell. 1982 May; 29(1):235-44.
[Cell. 1982]Bioessays. 1993 Jul; 15(7):451-60.
[Bioessays. 1993]Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Feb; 6(2):530-8.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1986]Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Dec; 7(12):4522-34.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1987]J Cell Biol. 1994 Nov; 127(4):995-1008.
[J Cell Biol. 1994]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995 Nov 2; 216(1):162-9.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995]J Biol Chem. 1994 Jun 24; 269(25):16997-7000.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 19; 92(26):12026-30.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Genetics. 1994 Feb; 136(2):485-503.
[Genetics. 1994]Genetics. 1997 Feb; 145(2):227-41.
[Genetics. 1997]Trends Cell Biol. 1996 Jun; 6(6):228-34.
[Trends Cell Biol. 1996]J Cell Biol. 1993 May; 121(3):503-12.
[J Cell Biol. 1993]Cell. 1993 May 21; 73(4):761-74.
[Cell. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 1; 89(19):8908-12.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Mol Biol Cell. 1996 Aug; 7(8):1195-208.
[Mol Biol Cell. 1996]Cell. 1991 Aug 9; 66(3):519-31.
[Cell. 1991]Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Feb; 17(2):620-6.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1997]Cell. 1997 Nov 14; 91(4):491-500.
[Cell. 1997]Cell. 1991 Feb 22; 64(4):717-25.
[Cell. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 19; 92(26):12026-30.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Mol Biol Cell. 1993 Aug; 4(8):859-70.
[Mol Biol Cell. 1993]Genetics. 1993 Nov; 135(3):677-91.
[Genetics. 1993]Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jul; 14(7):4731-40.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1994]J Cell Biol. 1994 Nov; 127(4):995-1008.
[J Cell Biol. 1994]Mol Cell Biol. 1994 May; 14(5):3158-65.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1994]J Cell Sci. 1997 Aug; 110 ( Pt 15)():1793-804.
[J Cell Sci. 1997]Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Jul; 9(7):1817-31.
[Mol Biol Cell. 1998]J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan; 153(1):163-8.
[J Bacteriol. 1983]Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Aug 11; 23(15):3079-81.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1995]Genetics. 1990 Feb; 124(2):237-49.
[Genetics. 1990]J Cell Biol. 1997 Dec 15; 139(6):1383-96.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 19; 92(26):12026-30.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Cell. 1991 Feb 22; 64(4):717-25.
[Cell. 1991]J Cell Biol. 1994 Nov; 127(4):995-1008.
[J Cell Biol. 1994]Genes Dev. 1993 Jul; 7(7A):1160-75.
[Genes Dev. 1993]Cell. 1997 Nov 14; 91(4):491-500.
[Cell. 1997]J Cell Biol. 1997 Dec 15; 139(6):1383-96.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 19; 92(26):12026-30.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Cell. 1997 Nov 14; 91(4):491-500.
[Cell. 1997]