• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 8, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3152298
NIHMSID: NIHMS313289

A Polarized Epithelium Organized by β- and α-Catenin Predates Cadherin and Metazoan Origins

Summary

A polarized epithelium in the non-metazoan Dictyostelium discoideum requires α-catenin and β-catenin but not classical cadherins, polarity proteins or Wnt signaling.

A fundamental characteristic of metazoans is the formation of a simple, polarized epithelium. In higher animals, the structural integrity and functional polarization of simple epithelia require a cell-cell adhesion complex containing a classical cadherin, the Wnt-signaling protein β-catenin and the actin-binding protein α-catenin. We show that the non-metazoan Dictyostelium discoideum forms a polarized epithelium that is essential for multicellular development. Although D. discoideum lacks a cadherin homolog, we identify an α-catenin ortholog that binds a β-catenin-related protein. Both proteins are essential for formation of the epithelium, polarized protein secretion and proper multicellular morphogenesis. Thus the organizational principles of metazoan multicellularity may be more ancient than previously recognized, and the role of the catenins in cell polarity predates the evolution of Wnt signaling and classical cadherins.

A simple epithelium is the most basic tissue type in metazoans (multicellular animals). It is the first overt sign of cellular differentiation during embryogenesis, and is important for the morphogenesis of many tissues and homeostasis in the adult (1). A simple epithelium comprises a cell monolayer surrounding a luminal space. The cells have a polarized organization of plasma membrane proteins, organelles and cytoskeletal networks that together regulate the directional absorption and secretion of proteins and other solutes (1).

The structural integrity and functional polarity of epithelial tissues in higher animals require cell-cell adhesion mediated by classical cadherins (2). Adhesion provides a spatial cue that initiates cell polarization via recruitment of cadherin-associated cytosolic proteins (3), including the Wnt signaling protein β-catenin (4) and the actin-binding protein α-catenin (5). Classical cadherins, which have extracellular cadherin repeats (6) and a conserved cytoplasmic domain that can bind β-catenin (7), are found in all multicellular animals including sponges, but not in choanoflagellates (8-10), suggesting that classical cadherins are restricted to metazoans. However, the evolutionary history of the catenins is unknown, and thus it is unclear how the cadherin-catenin complex evolved to mediate epithelial polarity in metazoans.

The non-metazoan social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum undergoes multicellular morphogenesis in response to starvation: single cells aggregate and undergo culmination to form a fruiting body, which comprises a rigid stalk that supports a collection of spores (Fig. 1a) (11). The mechanical rigidity of the stalk is due to the stalk tube, which contains cellulose and the extracellular matrix proteins EcmA/B (Fig. 1b) (12, 13). Harwood and colleagues described a ring of cells surrounding the stalk tube at the tip of the culminant (Fig. 1a, b and Movie S1) and speculated that these cells might contribute to stalk formation during culmination (14, 15). However, the subcellular organization and function of tip cells have not been characterized.

Figure 1
A) D. discoideum developmental process. Abbreviations: M, mound; Sl, slug; C, culminant; FB, fruiting body.

We confirmed the earlier observation (14) that the tip consists of an organized monolayer of cells surrounding the stalk (Fig. 1b and Movie S1). Additionally, we found that these cells have a distinctive polarized organization: centrosomes and Golgi localized to the stalk side of nuclei (Fig. 1c), and the transmembrane protein cellulose synthase (encoded by the dcsA gene (12)) localized to the plasma membrane domain adjacent to the stalk tube (Fig. 1d). Thus, D. discoideum tip cells have a subcellular organization characteristic of a simple polarized epithelium (Fig. S1), and we refer to these cells as the tip epithelium.

In metazoans, β-catenin and α-catenin are essential for formation of polarized simple epithelia (16, 17). A β-catenin-related protein called Aardvark has been identified in D. discoideum (Fig. S2) (9, 14). We identified a member of the α-catenin family in this organism, which we named Ddα-catenin on the basis of structural and functional characteristics (9). Ddα-catenin is approximately 35% homologous to human α-catenins and their paralog vinculin (Figs. 2a, S3-S5). Ddα-catenin was expressed at low levels in single D. discoideum cells but was up-regulated during multicellular development (Fig. 2b). Endogenous Ddα-catenin localized to cell-cell contacts in the slug and fruiting body (Figs. S6, S7a), and especially in columnar cells of the tip epithelium (Fig. 2c).

Figure 2
A) Primary structures of Ddα-catenin and human α-catenin and vinculin. Regions of homology are shaded gray. NTD, N-terminal domain; M, M-domain; ABD, actin-binding domain; P, proline-rich region.

We examined whether Ddα-catenin is similar to metazoan α-catenin or vinculin, or both (9). Like metazoan α-catenin, Ddα-catenin bound and bundled actin filaments (Fig. 2d, e). Ddα-catenin bound to the D. discoideum β-catenin-related protein Aardvark (Fig. 2f) and mouse β-catenin (Fig. S9), and its localization to cell-cell contacts in vivo was Aardvark-dependent (Figs. 2c, S7). Unlike mammalian αE-catenin, but like the C. elegans α-catenin ortholog HMP-1 (18), purified Ddα-catenin was monomeric in solution (Fig. S10), and it did not inhibit the actin-nucleating activity of the Arp2/3 complex (Fig. 2g). In contrast to its overall similarity to metazoan α-catenin, Ddα-catenin lacked key properties of metazoan vinculin (Figs. S11, S12) (9). Because Ddα-catenin represents the most basally-branching members of the α-catenin/vinculin family (Fig. S4), these data indicate that the ancestral member of this protein family was probably α-catenin-like.

To test whether Ddα-catenin and its binding partner Aardvark are involved in the polarized organization of the tip epithelium, we depleted Ddα-catenin using RNA interference (Fig. S13). When Ddα-catenin was depleted below a level that could be detected by immunofluorescence, multicellular development arrested at the onset of culmination (Fig. 3a). Tip cells were disorganized and the stalk and tip epithelium were absent (Figs. 3a, b). Moreover, the distributions of Golgi and centrosomes were not polarized (Figs. 3c, S14), and cellulose synthase was mislocalized intracellularly (Fig. 3d). Culminants with partial Ddα-catenin knockdown exhibited a milder phenotype: a distinct stalk and tip epithelium formed, but the epithelium appeared disorganized and was more than one cell layer thick (Fig. 3b), and organelles (Figs. 3c, S14, arrowheads) and cellulose synthase (Fig. 3d) were not correctly polarized. Prestalk cell differentiation was unaffected in Ddα-catenin knockdowns, indicating that the lack of a stalk was not due to a failure of the developmental program to correctly specify cell types (Fig. S15).

Figure 3
A) Early culminants formed by wild-type and Ddα-catenin knockdown cells.

Similar results were obtained with an Aardvark knockout strain (14) (Figs. 3b-d, S14), indicating that both Ddα-catenin and Aardvark are required to organize and polarize the tip epithelium during culmination. Harwood and colleagues reported that Aardvark was necessary for formation of actin-associated cell-cell junctions in tip cells that appeared similar to adherens junctions at the ultrastructural level (14, 15, 19). However, we found that Aardvark knockouts formed junctions similar to wild-type, as did Ddα-catenin knockdowns (Fig. S16). Because these junctions do not require Ddα-catenin or Aardvark, and D. discoideum does not have classical cadherins, we conclude that these junctions are unlikely to be molecularly equivalent to metazoan adherens junctions (9) and are not involved in the developmental phenotypes described above.

To better understand the developmental mechanism underlying impaired stalk formation in Ddα-catenin knockdowns and Aardvark knockouts, we examined whether the stalk tube components cellulose and EcmA/B were correctly distributed. Accumulation of cellulose and EcmA/B in the stalk tube was absent in severe Ddα-catenin knockdowns, and was strongly reduced in mild Ddα-catenin knockdowns and Aardvark knockouts (Figs. 4a, S17a, b) (19). Note that cellulose synthase (compare Figs. 3d and and1d)1d) and EcmA/B (Figs. 4a, S17a, b, arrowheads) were mislocalized intracellularly in tip epithelial cells but were unchanged in stalk cells, indicating that tip epithelial cells are the primary source of secreted cellulose and EcmA/B in the stalk tube. Confirming this interpretation, we observed rare cases in which half of the tip epithelium was better organized than the other half, and in those culminants cellulose and EcmA/B accumulated in the stalk tube adjacent to the better-organized tip epithelial cells (Fig. S18). Significantly, in cellulose synthase knockouts, which do not form a stalk tube (12), the tip epithelium was morphologically normal and EcmA/B were secreted (Fig. 4b, S17c), demonstrating that tip epithelial polarity is genetically upstream of stalk tube formation.

Figure 4
A) Confocal sections of the tip epithelium in culminants of the indicated cells. Arrows indicate deposition of small amounts of extracellular cellulose and EcmA/B in a nascent stalk tube. Arrowheads indicate intracellular accumulation of EcmA/B.

Since tip epithelial cells appear to secrete cellulose and EcmA/B directionally to form an organized stalk tube, we tested whether the secretory pathway was polarized in wild-type and mutant strains. Sec15, a component of the Exocyst complex involved in polarized exocytosis in diverse systems (20), localized adjacent to the stalk tube (Fig. 4c), reminiscent of Exocyst localization in polarized mammalian epithelial cells (21), and this distribution was strongly disrupted in Ddα-catenin knockdowns and Aardvark knockouts (Fig. 4c). The molecular mechanisms underlying the polarized organization of the Exocyst in D. discoideum are unknown, but it is interesting to note that the catenins have been reported to associate in a complex with Exocyst components in mammalian cells (22).

Taken together with earlier results (14), our work shows that the non-metazoan Dictyostelium discoideum has a bona fide polarized epithelium consisting of a single layer of structurally and functionally polarized cells that secrete proteins into a luminal space (Fig. S1). Significantly, epithelial polarity in both metazoans and D. discoideum requires homologs of α-catenin and β-catenin, indicating a close evolutionary relationship between D. discoideum and metazoan epithelia. Since D. discoideum lacks cadherins, Wnt signaling components and polarity proteins of the PAR, Crumbs and Scribble complexes (9), the conserved catenin complex appears to be an ancient functional module that mediates epithelial polarity in the absence of the more complicated machinery found in metazoans (1).

The fact that the catenin complex is essential for epithelial polarity in both D. discoideum and metazoans indicates that this complex likely functioned in cell polarity prior to the divergence of social amoebae and metazoans. It is possible that the catenins evolved initially to mediate cell polarity in a unicellular organism, and then were used to organize cell polarity in a multicellular context in both social amoebae and metazoans. Alternatively, the last common ancestor of social amoebae and metazoans may have formed a polarized epithelial tissue organized by the catenin complex, but epithelial polarity was lost in some intervening lineages (9). In either case, our results identify unexpected similarities in tissue organization between two groups of distantly related organisms that were thought to have evolved multicellularity independently (23), and thereby reveal molecular factors and organizational principles that may have contributed to the early evolution and diversification of animals.

Supplementary Material

Movie 1

Movie 2

Acknowledgments

We thank numerous colleagues for reagents (9); T. Soldati for sharing Sec15 antibodies prior to publication; C. Carswell-Crumpton, N. Ghori, J. Perrino and T. Weiss for technical assistance; D. Ehrhardt, N. King, D.N. Robinson, T. Soldati, J.A. Spudich, M. Tsujioka, H. Warrick and members of the Nelson and Weis laboratories for discussions. This work was supported by a Stanford Graduate Fellowship and an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (DJD), NIH GM035527 (WJN) and NIH GM56169 (WIW). Portions of this research were carried out at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, supported by the US DoE and NIGMS.

References and Notes

1. Bryant DM, Mostov KE. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:887. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Nelson WJ. Nature. 2003;422:766. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Nelson WJ. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2008;036:149. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Clevers H. Cell. 2006;127:469. [PubMed]
5. Rimm DL, Koslov ER, Kebriaei P, Cianci CD, Morrow JS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:8813. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Hulpiau P, Roy Fv. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41:349. [PubMed]
7. Huber AH, Weis WI. Cell. 2001;105:391. [PubMed]
8. Srivastava M, et al. Nature. 2010;466:720. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Materials and methods and additional text are available as supporting online material.
10. Abedin M, King N. Science. 2008;319:946. [PubMed]
11. Urushihara H. Development, Growth & Differentiation. 2008;50:S277. [PubMed]
12. Blanton RL, Fuller D, Iranfar N, Grimson MJ, Loomis WF. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2391. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. McRobbie SJ, Tilly R, Blight K, Ceccarelli A, Williams JG. Dev Biol. 1988;125:59. [PubMed]
14. Grimson MJ, et al. Nature. 2000;408:727. [PubMed]
15. Williams HP, Harwood AJ. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2003;6:621. [PubMed]
16. Watabe M, Nagafuchi A, Tsukita S, Takeichi M. J Cell Biol. 1994;127:247. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Torres M, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:901. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Kwiatkowski AV, et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107:14591. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Coates JC, et al. Mech Dev. 2002;116:117. [PubMed]
20. He B, Guo W. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21:537. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Grindstaff KK, et al. Cell. 1998;93:731. [PubMed]
22. Yeaman C, Grindstaff KK, Nelson WJ. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:559. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. King N. Dev Cell. 2004;7:313. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Compound
    Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • Gene
    Gene
    Gene links
  • GEO Profiles
    GEO Profiles
    Related GEO records
  • HomoloGene
    HomoloGene
    HomoloGene links
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Pathways + GO
    Pathways + GO
    Pathways, annotations and biological systems (BioSystems) that cite the current article.
  • Protein
    Protein
    Published protein sequences
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links
  • Taxonomy
    Taxonomy
    Related taxonomy entry
  • Taxonomy Tree
    Taxonomy Tree

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...