• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of aacPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalAAC ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Aug 2011; 55(8): 3765–3773.
PMCID: PMC3147645

Detection of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Type XI Carrying Highly Divergent mecA, mecI, mecR1, blaZ, and ccr Genes in Human Clinical Isolates of Clonal Complex 130 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus[down-pointing small open triangle]


Methicillin resistance in staphylococci is mediated by penicillin binding protein 2a (PBP 2a), encoded by mecA on mobile staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) elements. In this study, two clonal complex 130 (CC130) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from patients in Irish hospitals were identified that were phenotypically PBP 2a positive but lacked mecA by conventional PCR and by DNA microarray screening. The isolates were identified as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus using the GeneXpert real-time PCR assay. Whole-genome sequencing of one isolate (M10/0061) revealed a 30-kb SCCmec element encoding a class E mec complex with highly divergent blaZ-mecA-mecR1-mecI, a type 8 cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) complex consisting of ccrA1-ccrB3, an arsenic resistance operon, and flanking direct repeats (DRs). The SCCmec element was almost identical to that of SCCmec type XI (SCCmec XI) identified by the Sanger Institute in sequence type 425 bovine MRSA strain LGA251 listed on the website of the International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements. The open reading frames (ORFs) identified within SCCmec XI of M10/0061 exhibited 21 to 93% amino acid identity to ORFs in GenBank. A third DR was identified ca. 3 kb downstream of SCCmec XI, indicating the presence of a possible SCC remnant. SCCmec XI was also identified in the second CC130 MRSA isolate by PCR and sequencing. The CC130 MRSA isolates may be of animal origin as previously reported CC130 S. aureus strains were predominantly from bovine sources. The highly divergent nature of SCCmec XI relative to other SCCmec elements indicates that it may have originated in another taxon.


Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates are S. aureus isolates that exhibit phenotypic resistance to methicillin and related β-lactam antibiotics, including cefoxitin and oxacillin. The first report of MRSA was in England in 1961 (24), and since then MRSA has become a major nosocomial problem. Today MRSA is one of the most important antibiotic-resistant pathogens in hospitals and communities around the world. There is also an increasing awareness of the significance of MRSA in animals and of the zoonotic potential of MRSA (69).

The success of S. aureus is partly due to its ability to acquire mobile genetic elements encoding virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes from other S. aureus isolates and from coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) species (12, 17, 21, 33, 46, 57, 58, 66). One such group of mobile genetic elements are the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) elements, which harbor the methicillin resistance gene mecA (22). Existing MRSA clones have arisen following the acquisition and integration of SCCmec into a specific site (the integration site sequence [ISS]) within an open reading frame (ORF) in the S. aureus chromosome designated orfX (21, 22). Until recently, the function of orfX was unknown, but in recent months it has been annotated as a 23S rRNA methyltransferase (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P0C1V0). SCCmec elements are characterized by the presence of flanking direct repeat (DR) sequences that are generated at both ends of the integrated SCCmec element (22). The mecA gene encodes the additional penicillin binding protein (PBP) 2a (in addition to PBP A to PBP D or PBP 1 to PBP 4) with a low affinity for β-lactam antibiotics, and the expression of mecA in MRSA allows cell wall synthesis to continue, despite inactivation of native PBPs by β-lactams (21, 48). The mecA gene forms part of the mec gene complex in SCCmec elements. Four classes of the mec gene complex (A to D), which differ in their genetic organization, have been described in the published literature (21, 26). Each has an intact copy of mecA, a copy of insertion sequence IS431, and, when present, complete or truncated mec regulatory genes mecI and mecR1. The cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) genes form another essential component of SCCmec that are involved in site-specific integration and excision of SCCmec (21, 27). To date, five ccr gene complexes (ccrA1B1, ccrA2B2, ccrA3B3, ccrA4B4, and ccrC) and eight SCCmec types (I to VIII) have been described in MRSA in the published literature, with the latter characterized by the presence of different combinations of ccr and mec complex genes and with subtypes defined by variations in the junkyard (J) regions (7, 11, 2123, 31, 45, 56, 75). Furthermore, some additional mec, ccr, and SCCmec types that have not yet been described in the published literature are listed on the SCCmec website curated by the International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements (IWG-SCC; http://www.sccmec.org/Pages/SCC_TypesEN.html). Because of the extensive diversity that has been observed in the genetic organization of SCCmec elements, the IWG-SCC was established to standardize criteria for the classification of SCCmec elements. Advice on appropriate nomenclature for novel SCCmec types and subtypes is available from the IWG-SCC, and it is recommended that the entire nucleotide sequence of all novel SCCmec elements be determined prior to SCCmec type designation (21).

SCCmec elements are not exclusive to MRSA and have also been reported in several CoNS species, many of which form part of the normal flora of healthy human and animal skin and mucous membranes and are frequently associated with opportunistic human and veterinary infections (9, 15, 18, 53, 62, 66, 70, 76). The presence of very similar SCCmec elements in MRSA and CoNS strongly suggests horizontal transfer of SCCmec (6, 8, 10, 17, 18, 61, 70). While the mechanism(s) and the exact route of transfer of SCCmec are presently unknown, the higher frequency and diversity of SCCmec elements in CoNS suggest that CoNS are potentially a reservoir of SCCmec elements that may facilitate the emergence of new MRSA clones (15, 16). In addition, several studies have identified mecA gene homologs with and without mec complex genes, as well as SCC elements without mecA but with ccr genes, as individual genetic components in CoNS and in the closely related species Macrococcus caseolyticus (40, 55, 65, 66, 73, 74). Thus, some researchers have speculated that such genetic elements may be the evolutionary precursors of SCCmec in CoNS and MRSA (66, 72).

In Ireland, MRSA has been endemic in hospitals since the 1980s, and different strains have predominated at different time periods (56). For the last decade, sequence type 22-MRSA-SCCmec type IV (ST22-MRSA-IV) isolates have dominated, and since 2003 they have accounted for 80% of MRSA isolates recovered from patients in Irish hospitals (51, 59). In line with trends worldwide, MRSA isolates harboring the Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene have emerged as community-acquired pathogens in Ireland and MRSA has also been reported among animals (1, 2, 32, 41, 52).

In the present study, we report on the identification of human clinical MRSA isolates from Ireland belonging to clonal complex 130 (CC130) that are detected as PBP 2a positive using two different latex agglutination assays but lack mecA, as detected by conventional mecA PCR. These MRSA isolates were detected as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) using the GeneXpert real-time PCR assay, which targets SCCmec and mecA, as well as the S. aureus protein A gene spa and the ISS, for the rapid detection of MRSA in clinical specimens (71). A comprehensive analysis of these isolates resulted in the identification of a novel SCCmec element with highly divergent mecA, mecI, mecR1, blaZ, and ccr genes.


Staphylococcus aureus isolates investigated.

Two clinical MRSA isolates (M10/0148 and M10/0061) were investigated in the present study. M10/0148 was isolated from a 64-year-old female inpatient in an acute care hospital in Dublin, Ireland, in February 2010, and M10/0061 was isolated from an 85-year-old male inpatient in a regional hospital in the southeast of Ireland in May 2010. There was no obvious epidemiological connection between these patients, and the two hospitals are approximately 160 kilometers apart. There was no information available indicating that the patients had had any contact with animal husbandry, domestic animals, raw meat, or other potential sources of zoonotic bacteria. Isolates were identified as S. aureus by detection of staphylocoagulase production (50), were inoculated onto Protect beads (Technical Service Consultants Limited, Heywood, United Kingdom), and stored at −70°C prior to subsequent detailed analysis.

A MSSA isolate (21250_V454) recovered from a brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) in Germany (courtesy of Sebastian Günther, Berlin University) was also included in the study for comparison since it was found to belong to the same clonal lineage and yielded DNA microarray hybridization patterns (see below) similar to those of the two clinical isolates.

Investigation of resistance to antimicrobial agents.

Screening for oxacillin/methicillin resistance was performed by culture of isolates on cefoxitin-containing ChromID MRSA selective agar (bioMérieux, Nuertlingen, Germany). The isolates were tested for methicillin resistance using 30-μg cefoxitin disks (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom) on BBL Mueller-Hinton II agar (Becton Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD) using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methodology (13). The MRSA isolates were further tested against oxacillin (1-μg and 5-μg disks; Oxoid) on Columbia blood agar (CBA; Oxoid) at 30°C. Oxacillin MICs were determined using the Etest system (bioMérieux) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and oxacillin MIC determinations were repeated using induced colonies that had been exposed to oxacillin. Additionally, susceptibility tests for the MRSA isolates were performed using the Vitek-2 system according to the manufacturer's instructions (Gram-positive bacteria susceptibility test card; bioMérieux). Both the MSSA isolate and the MRSA isolates were tested for PBP 2a production using a Mastalex MRSA kit (Mast Diagnostics, Bootle, United Kingdom), an MRSA-Screen latex agglutination assay (Innogenetics, Gent, Belgium), and a Clearview Exact PBP 2a kit (Alere, Cologne, Germany). All isolates were also tested for the presence of mecA by PCR using previously described primers (44) and novel primers to amplify the entire mecA gene (Table 1), with MRSA strains N315 (29) and ATCC 43300 as positive controls and MSSA strains MSSA476 (19, 29) and ATCC 25923 as negative controls. The MRSA isolates underwent antibiogram-resistogram (AR) typing as described previously to determine their resistance to a panel of 23 antimicrobial agents (52). The AR typing panel consists of the following antimicrobial agents: amikacin, ampicillin, cadmium acetate, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, ethidium bromide, fusidic acid, gentamicin, kanamycin, lincomycin, mercuric chloride, mupirocin, neomycin, phenyl mercuric acetate, rifampin, spectinomycin, streptomycin, sulfonamide, tetracycline, tobramycin, trimethoprim, and vancomycin (52). The MRSA isolates were tested for susceptibility to arsenicals using 100-, 250-, and 500-μg sodium arsenite disks and 250-, 500-, and 1,000-μg sodium arsenate disks and the CLSI methodology (13). The arsenic-resistant S. aureus reference strain WGB8404 (43) and the arsenic-susceptible S. aureus reference strain RN4220 (28) were used as controls. The MRSA isolates were also tested for susceptibility to sodium arsenite by broth microdilution. For these experiments, the arsenic-susceptible S. aureus strain NCTC8325 (42) and the arsenic-resistant strain WGB8404 were used as controls. Briefly, doubling dilutions of sodium arsenite (range, 10 to 10,000 μg/ml) were prepared in nutrient broth (Oxoid) supplemented with 2% (wt/vol) glucose. Inocula were prepared from cultures grown on CBA and adjusted to a density corresponding to a 0.5 McFarland standard (bioMérieux), and 20 μl was added to the wells of 96-well microtiter plates containing 80 μl of the respective sodium arsenite dilutions. Following overnight incubation at 37°C, plates were examined visually for growth.

Table 1.
Novel PCR primers used in the study

Investigation of isolates using the GeneXpert real-time PCR assay for the rapid detection of MRSA in clinical specimens.

The MRSA isolates M10/0148 and M10/0061 were both tested using the Xpert MRSA/SA SSTI assay on a GeneXpert DX system (version 1.2) real-time PCR platform (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions, to determine if the MRSA isolates would be detected as MRSA using this system, which targets SCCmec-associated and spa DNA sequences. The MSSA isolate 21250_V454 was also tested.

Total genomic DNA isolation.

Genomic DNA was extracted from all isolates by enzymatic lysis using the buffers and solutions provided with the StaphyType DNA microarray kit (described below) and the Qiagen DNeasy kit (Crawley, West Sussex, United Kingdom) as described previously (35).

Molecular typing.

The isolates underwent spa typing and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) as described previously (14, 60).

DNA microarray analysis.

The isolates were subjected to DNA microarray analysis using the StaphyType kit (Alere Technologies GmbH), which detects 334 S. aureus gene sequences and alleles, including species-specific, antimicrobial resistance- and virulence-associated genes, and typing markers (35). The genes detected using the array include previously described SCCmec-associated gene sequences, including mecA, its regulatory genes mecI and mecR1, various allotypes of the ccr genes, and gene sequences previously identified in the J regions of various SCCmec elements. The DNA microarray procedures have been described previously and were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (35). DNA microarray analysis of each isolate was performed on three separate occasions, and two different labeling approaches were employed. In one, amplification and labeling were directed by target-specific primers (35). In the second, the complete genome was labeled using randomized oligonucleotides instead of the site-specific labeling as in the first method (37, 39). The latter protocol proved to be useful for the detection of mutated or divergent target genes, e.g., genes from strains that are not fully represented by the published S. aureus genome sequences due to the different stringency of the overall labeling and hybridization process.

PCR and sequencing of the genes encoding the native S. aureus PBPs 1 to 4.

The S. aureus genes encoding PBPs 1 to 4 were amplified and sequenced using Taq polymerase (Genaxxon BioScience GmbH, Biberach, Germany), the primers PBP 1 to PBP 4 (Table 1), and the following conditions: 95°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 2 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1% (wt/vol) agarose gels, ethidium bromide staining, and visualization under UV light. Bands were extracted from agarose gels, and DNA was purified using a Qiaex II gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing was performed using the PCR primers and BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (version 1.1; Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sequence analysis was performed using a 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems).

Whole-genome sequencing of M10/0061.

The whole genome of one MRSA isolate, M10/0061, was sequenced to investigate the location of the ccr genes identified in both isolates using the DNA microarray and to investigate the possible presence of a novel SCCmec element. High-throughput de novo sequencing was undertaken commercially by Geneservice (Source BioScience plc, Nottingham, United Kingdom) using an Illumina genome analyzer system (HiSeq 2000 platform; Essex, United Kingdom). The average coverage across the genome was 40 times. The reads were assembled into contigs using a Velvet de novo genome assembler (version 1.0.15; Illumina). Contigs were analyzed using the Artemis DNA sequence viewer and annotation tool (54) and BLAST software (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (3). ORFs were predicted using prodigal (http://prodigal.ornl.gov/) (20), a gene prediction algorithm designed specifically for prokaryotic sequences. Prodigal was trained with four fully sequenced and annotated S. aureus genomes (GenBank accession numbers CP000046.1, BA000017.4, BX571856.1, and AJ938182.1). All predicted ORFs were analyzed against a local database of all staphylococcal sequences extracted from GenBank using the BLAST standalone software package (version 2.2.24; NCBI). The sequences of the ORFs were globally aligned with the best-matching sequences from the local database, and the positions of start and stop codons and potential ribosomal binding sites were checked for consistency. All ORFs were translated into protein sequences, and the protein sequences were analyzed against the NCBI nonredundant database of protein sequences with the BLAST program. Amino acid identities between two sequences were calculated from global sequence alignments. The sequences were aligned with the needle global alignment program from the EMBOSS software package (49). Relative identities were calculated from the number of identical amino acids in the alignment with respect to the length of the new sequence from SCCmec type XI (SCCmec XI). These overall amino acid identities were calculated for the best-matching BLAST sequence. In addition, for the mec complex genes, amino acid identities were calculated for additional sequences which represented different allotypes or paralogs of the gene concerned. Occurrences of the characteristic DRs of SCCmec were detected with the bl2seq program from the NCBI BLAST software package.

PCRs to confirm the presence of novel mecA and ccr allotypes and SCCmec element in M10/0148.

Having determined the presence of novel allotypes of ccr, mecA, blaZ, and the mec regulatory genes mecI and mecR1 in M10/0061 by analysis of its whole-genome sequence, primer pairs ccrB3M10/0061 F1/ccrA1M10/0061 R1 and mecAM10/0061 F1/mecAM10/0061 R1 were designed to investigate M10/0148 for the presence of ccrA1B3M10/0061 and mecAM10/0061, respectively (Table 1). In addition, primer pair orfX F1/mecIM10/0061 R2 was used to amplify and sequence the complete mec gene complex in M10/0148, and four additional primer pairs were used to amplify the remainder of the novel SCCmec element (between DRs 1 and 2) and the 3-kb region identified between the second and third DRs in M10/0061 in M10/0148 (Table 1 and Fig. 1). DNA fragments were obtained by PCR amplification of chromosomal DNA using either GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) for primers ccrB3M10/0061 F1/ccrA1M10/0061 R1 and mecAM10/0061 F1/mecAM10/0061 R1 or the Expand Long-Template PCR system (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., Lewes, East Sussex, United Kingdom) for all other primer pairs according to the manufacturers' instructions. The whole-genome-sequenced isolate M10/0061 harboring the novel mecA allotype and MRSA strain CA05 (31) harboring SCCmec IV and encoding the original mecA allotype were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis, gel red staining (Biotium, Hayward, CA), and visualization under UV light. PCR products were purified using a Genelute PCR cleanup kit (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland). DNA sequencing was performed commercially by Geneservice (Source Bioscience, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland). Sequence analysis was performed using the BLAST, BioNumerics (version 5.1; Applied Maths, Ghent, Belgium), and DNA Strider software packages.

Fig. 1.
Schematic diagram showing the genetic organization of the SCCmec element designated SCCmec XI and the adjacent 3-kb downstream region in the ST130 MRSA isolate M10/0061 (GenBank accession number ...

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The nucleotide sequence of the SCCmec element (SCCmec XI) and the 3-kb DNA sequence identified adjacent to SCCmec XI were deposited in GenBank under the accession number FR823292. The nucleotide sequences of PBPs 1, 2, 3, and 4 identified in M10/0061 by whole-genome sequencing have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers FR823293, FR823294, FR823295, and FR823296, respectively.


Identification of two PBP 2a-positive clinical MRSA isolates that lack mecA by conventional mecA PCR.

The S. aureus isolates M10/0061 and M10/0148 exhibited resistance to cefoxitin (30-μg cefoxitin disks) and oxacillin (1-μg and 5-μg disks), exhibited growth on ChromID MRSA selective agar, and were identified by the Vitek-2 system as MRSA. The two isolates exhibited oxacillin MICs of 1.0 mg/liter and 2.0 mg/liter, respectively, and for both isolates, these rose to 16 mg/liter when the colonies were induced (i.e., cultured in the presence of oxacillin) prior to oxacillin MIC determination. Both isolates were positive for production of PBP 2a using the Mastalex and Clearview latex agglutination assays but were PBP 2a negative using the Innogenetics PBP 2a assay. Furthermore, neither isolate yielded any amplicons following PCR using mecA primers, while the positive control MRSA strains N315 and ATCC 43300 yielded amplicons corresponding to the amplification of mecA. AR typing revealed that the isolates exhibited resistance to ampicillin only out of the 23 antimicrobials tested in the AR typing panel. Both MRSA isolates exhibited resistance to sodium arsenite and sodium arsenate.

The MSSA isolate did not grow in the presence of cefoxitin, was negative for the production of PBP 2a using the Mastalex, Innogenetics, and Clearview latex agglutination assays, and was mecA negative by both mecA PCR assays.


The two MRSA isolates, M10/0061 and M10/0148, were identified as S. aureus but not as MRSA using the GeneXpert MRSA real-time PCR assay. Identical results were obtained for the rat MSSA isolate 21250_V454.

Molecular typing.

The two MRSA isolates exhibited two different STs, ST130 and ST1764, following MLST analysis, with both belonging to CC130 (Table 2), respectively. ST1764 is a single-locus variant of ST130 that differs by only 1 nucleotide base within the tpi gene. The MSSA isolate was also assigned to CC130 (Table 2). Using spa typing, the MRSA isolates exhibited two closely related spa types (t843 and t373) (Table 2), which differ by the presence of two additional repeat units in t843. The MSSA isolate exhibited a novel but related spa type t8403 which differed from spa type t843 in the deletion of one repeat unit and from t373 in the presence of one additional repeat unit.

Table 2.
MLST, spa types, and DNA microarray hybridization profiles of MRSA isolates M10/0061 and M10/0148 and MSSA isolate 21250_V454

DNA microarray analysis.

The DNA microarray results for the two MRSA isolates and the MSSA isolate are shown in Table 2. DNA microarray analysis confirmed the absence of mecA in the MSSA and MRSA isolates. No mec regulatory genes were detected. The MSSA and MRSA isolates yielded very similar DNA microarray signals, except that the MRSA isolates exhibited weak and/or variable signals for ccrB1, ccrA3, and ccrB3 in the primer-directed protocol, while the random protocol yielded signals for ccrB1 and ccrB3 (Table 2). This suggested the possible presence of a novel ccr allotype in the MRSA isolates. No other known SCC or SCCmec-associated genes were detected in MRSA isolates M10/0061 and M10/0148 (Table 2).

DNA and amino acid sequence analysis of the genes encoding PBPs 1 to 4.

Comparative analysis of the DNA sequences of the genes encoding PBPs 1 to 4 from CC130 MRSA isolates M10/0061 and M10/0148 and the CC130 MSSA isolate revealed that each gene in the MRSA isolates exhibited 100% DNA sequence identity to each other and to the corresponding genes in the MSSA isolate. The PBP sequences identified in M10/0061 by whole-genome sequencing were submitted to GenBank.

Identification of an SCCmec element encoding a novel mecA allotype in MRSA isolate M10/0061.

Whole-genome sequencing of the ST130 MRSA isolate M10/0061 yielded 401 contigs ranging in size from ca. 100 bp to 100 kb, and 46 of these were >20 kb in size. The ccr genes were localized to a 90-kb contig that was found to contain sequences encoding a 30-kb SCCmec element which was analyzed in depth (Fig. 1). Because the present study focused on the 30-kb SCCmec element and immediately adjacent ORFs, other ORFs encoded by the 90-kb contig or other contigs are not discussed further here. Details of the ORFs identified within SCCmec of M10/0061 are described in Table S1 in the supplemental material. The SCCmec element harbored a novel allotype of the mecA gene designated mecAM10/0061, the predicted protein from which exhibited 62% amino acid (aa) identity with MecA proteins previously described in MRSA and 63% aa identity with MecA from Staphylococcus kloosii and Staphylococcus vitulinus. Novel allotypes of the mec regulatory genes mecI and mecR1 were also identified upstream of mecAM10/0061, and they encoded proteins that exhibited 66% and 45% aa identities with proteins encoded by previously described MRSA mecI and mecR1 genes, respectively (Fig. 1). A novel allotype of the β-lactamase resistance gene blaZ was identified downstream of mecA but still within the SCCmec element and exhibited 67% aa identity with the previously known S. aureus blaZ gene. The ccrAB genes within the SCCmec element from M10/0061 consisted of ccrA1 and ccrB3 genes and exhibited 86% and 93% aa identities to previously described ccrA1 and ccrB3 genes in the GenBank database, respectively.

The SCCmec element in M10/0061 was integrated at the same nucleotide position within orfX in M10/0061 as all other SCCmec elements described in MRSA isolates to date and was flanked by DR sequences (DR-1 and DR-2) that are characteristic of SCCmec elements (Fig. 1). A third DR (DR-3; Fig. 1) was identified outside the SCCmec region ca. 3 kb downstream of DR-2 in the novel SCCmec element. Three ORFs were identified within this 3-kb, region but they exhibited only weak similarity (39 to 53% aa identity) with ORFs in nonstaphylococcal species (Fig. 1; see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

No ORFs were identified in the 316-bp DNA sequence identified between orfX and blaZ in the SCCmec element from M10/0061; i.e., no ORFs were identified in the J3 region. The J2 region (between the mec gene complex and the ccr genes) of the SCCmec element was ca. 4.5 kb and contained seven ORFs. For 6/7 ORFs, the highest similarities (49 to 91%) were to hypothetical proteins of S. aureus (2 of which were SCCmec related), M. caseolyticus, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. For one ORF in the J2 region, the highest similarity was to a transposase of Clostridium spp., but these ORFs exhibited just 21% aa identity. The J1 region (between the ccr genes and DR-2) of the SCCmec element was ca. 16.5 kb, and 14 ORFs were identified. The highest similarities for any ORFs within the J1 region were of three ORFs (79 to 93% aa identity) to the arsenic resistance operon genes arsC, arsB, and arsR. For 2/14 ORFs (ORF_115 and ORF_16) in the J1 region, the highest similarity was to ORFs encoding hypothetical proteins described in SCCmec elements, one in MRSA and one in Staphylococcus hominis. Of the nine remaining ORFs within the J1 region, eight exhibited amino acid identities ranging from 39 to 89% to ORFs from CoNS, including a cassette chromosome helicase protein, a lipase precursor protein, a FAD-binding dehydrogenase, two ABC transporter proteins, a flavin reductase protein, a major facilitator superfamily protein, and a hypothetical protein. The remaining ORF (ORF_117) exhibited weak similarity (32% aa identity) with a DNA helicase in a nonstaphylococcal species.

Designation of the SCCmec element of M10/0061 as SCCmec XI.

The website of the IWG-SCC (http://www.sccmec.org/Pages/SCC_TypesEN.html) lists a SCCmec type, designated SCCmec XI, from MRSA isolate LGA251 with a genetic organization within the mec and ccr complex genes similar to that of the SCCmec element identified in the present study in M10/0061. A search of the published literature and GenBank failed to yield descriptions of SCCmec XI. MRSA isolate LGA251 was originally recovered from a bovine source and has previously been assigned to ST425 (34) (http://www.sanger.as.uk/pathogens). The whole-genome sequence of LGA251 has been determined by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (Cambridge, United Kingdom) and is available on the Sanger Institute website (http://www.sanger.as.uk/pathogens). Because the whole-genome sequence of LGA251 is not currently available in GenBank and has not yet been published, permission was obtained from the Sanger Institute to compare the SCCmec element identified in the human clinical MRSA isolate M10/0061 in the present study with that of SCCmec XI first identified by the Sanger Institute in bovine MRSA isolate LGA251. This comparative analysis revealed that both SCCmec elements exhibited 99.9% DNA sequence identity. Thus, we have designated the SCCmec type of M10/0061 XI (http://www.sccmec.org/Pages/SCC_TypesEN.html). Similarly, we have designated the mec complex of M10/0061, consisting of divergent blaZ, mecA, mecR1, and mecI genes, class E mec, reflecting the corresponding IWG-SCC designation for LGA251 (Fig. 1). The ccrA1B3 gene combination of M10/0061 was designated type 8 ccr complex, again reflecting the corresponding IWG-SCC designation for LGA251 (Fig. 1).

No sequence similarity to the 3-kb region downstream of DR-2 in SCCmec XIM10/0061 (Fig. 1) was identified downstream of SCCmec XI in LGA251.

Detection of SCCmec XI in M10/0148.

PCR and sequencing revealed the presence of ccrA1B3M10/0061 and mecAM10/0061 as well as mecIM10/0061, mecR1M10/0061, and blaZM10/0061 in the second clinical CC130 MRSA isolate, M10/0148. Each of these genes exhibited 99 to 100% DNA sequence identity with the corresponding genes identified in M10/0061. The presence of the entire SCCmec XI element and the 3-kb region between DR-2 and DR-3 was also confirmed in M10/0148 using PCR and 10 primer pairs. M10/0148 yielded amplicons of the expected size using all primer pairs.


Methicillin-resistant S. aureus continues to be a significant problem in many hospitals worldwide, with potentially serious consequences for patients and significant extra demands on health care resources. Correct identification of MRSA is essential to ensure appropriate isolation and treatment of patients. Here we report on two MRSA isolates recovered from patients in Irish hospitals that exhibited phenotypic resistance to methicillin but were identified as MSSA using mecA PCR, a DNA microarray, the GeneXpert rapid real-time PCR assay, and a PBP latex agglutination assay. These two CC130 MRSA isolates harbored a 30-kb SCCmec element, designated SCCmec XI, that had several striking features, including highly divergent mecA, mecI, mecR1, blaZ, and ccr genes, and that was almost identical to an unpublished SCCmec element, designated SCCmec XI on the IWG-SCC website (http://www.sccmec.org/Pages/SCC_TypesEN.html). Each ORF identified within SCCmec element XI exhibited 21 to 93% aa identity to previously described ORFs in GenBank (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), indicating that this SCCmec element is distantly related to previously described SCCmec elements and may possibly represent an ancestral form of SCCmec in MRSA.

In all SCCmec elements that have been described previously in the literature, the mec complex genes (mecA, mecI, and mecR1) are almost identical. In contrast, the mecA, mecR1, and mecI genes identified in the CC130 MRSA isolates in the present study were highly divergent, exhibiting only 62%, 45%, and 66% aa identities, respectively, with the corresponding genes in GenBank. In addition, while mecA homologs have been described previously in Staphylococcus kloosii, Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus vitulinus, and M. caseolyticus (55, 65, 66, 73), the mecA gene in the CC130 isolates was also clearly distinct from each of these genes, exhibiting only 21 to 63% aa identity. The combination of ccr genes identified within SCCmec XI was also different from those previously described and was assigned a novel ccr type combination designated type 8.

Another unusual feature of the mec complex identified in SCCmec XI was the presence of blaZ upstream of mecA. The blaZ gene encodes a β-lactamase and is generally found as part of the bla operon (blaI, blaR1, and blaZ), which is widespread among Gram-positive bacteria. Apart from the mec complex identified in SCCmec XI in CC130 MRSA isolates in the present study and in bovine isolate LGA251 on the IWG-SCC website, the only previous report of a mec complex with blaZ was from M. caseolyticus, where a transposon harboring a mec gene complex with the same genetic organization as that in SCCmec XI (blaZ, mecA, mecR1, and mecI) was integrated downstream of orfX and was flanked by DRs (65). A non-mecA SCC element was integrated next to the mec transposon in M. caseolyticus and was separated from mecA by DRs. It has been speculated previously that the mec gene complex was generated following integration of mecA into the bla operon and that the blaZ-mecA-mecR1-mecI complex in M. caseolyticus may represent the ancestral form of the mec gene complex in staphylococci (4, 63, 65). The mec complex of SCCmec XI may represent a putative ancestral mec gene complex in MRSA.

The J regions of SCCmec XI also differed significantly from those of previously described SCCmec elements. The J3 region of SCCmec XI was just 316 bp in size, which is substantially smaller than the J3 regions identified in SCCmec I to VIII. The J2 and J1 regions were more comparable in size to those of previously described SCCmec elements, but the 21 ORFs identified (excluding the ccr and mec complex genes) exhibited similarities to previously described ORFs ranging from only 21% to 93%. In addition, for only 4/21 ORFs the highest similarities (62 to 88%) were to genes previously identified in SCCmec elements in MRSA or CoNS. The remaining 17 ORFs exhibited similarities to non-SCCmec DNA sequences in S. aureus and CoNS and in some cases weak similarity to the sequences in nonstaphylococcal species. Of particular interest was the identification of genes with similarity (79 to 93% aa identity) to those of an arsenic resistance operon, consisting of arsR, a transcriptional repressor; arsB, an arsenite efflux pump; and arsC, an arsenate reductase. Both isolates exhibited resistance to sodium arsenite and sodium arsenate. Arsenic occurs naturally in the environment and is commonly found in the earth's crust; but it can also originate from agriculture and industry as a result of the use of pesticides, waste processing, and mining, and arsenic in drinking water is a problem in many parts of the world (47). Arsenic resistance genes have been identified in chromosomal and plasmid locations in many bacterial species, including S. aureus, CoNS, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas fluorescens (47). While genes encoding resistance to other heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury have been reported previously in SCC elements, including SCCmer in MRSA (22) and the SCC composite island in S. epidermidis strain ATCC 12228 (40), previously reported arsenic resistance genes in staphylococci have been plasmid located (47) and have not been associated with SCCmec. The very significant differences between SCCmec XI and previously described SCCmec elements suggest that SCCmec XI may have originated in another species or genus and are further evidence to support the theory that interspecies transfer of SCCmec may play a role in the emergence of novel MRSA strains.

It has been suggested previously that smaller SCCmec elements are more competitive than larger mobile genetic elements and that they may be more readily transferred between staphylococci (21, 31). The relatively small size of SCCmec XI (30 kb) suggests that it has the potential to become widespread among S. aureus and other staphylococci. In fact, MRSA strains harboring this novel SCCmec element may be more widespread than is currently known. First, this study identified SCCmec XI in CC130 MRSA clinical isolates from humans, and the Sanger Institute has also identified its presence in the ST425 bovine MRSA isolate LGA251 (http://www.sanger.as.uk/pathogens). This suggests that SCCmec XI has been horizontally transferred between two distinct S. aureus clones. However, the 3-kb region that was identified downstream of SCCmec in the CC130 isolates and that was flanked by DRs characteristic of SCC elements is absent in LGA251. This suggests that in the CC130 isolates SCCmec XI may have integrated adjacent to an existing SCC/SCCmec element that was subsequently partially lost, leaving behind this 3-kb SCC remnant. The weak similarity between the ORFs in this 3-kb region to unrelated nonstaphylococcal species suggests that another taxon may be the source of this possible SCC remnant. In addition, the CC130 MRSA isolates in the present study were not detected as MRSA using different mecA PCRs, the DNA microarray genotyping approach, or the GeneXpert MRSA assay, and therefore, there may be more MRSA strains harboring this SCCmec element that have not yet been detected. While confirmation of this hypothesis requires detailed molecular characterization of strains from human and animal sources, inclusion of the DNA sequences of these highly variant mec complex and ccr genes into the design of mecA PCR, DNA microarray, and rapid real-time PCR as well as antibody-based assays will aid the future detection of MRSA strains harboring this novel SCCmec element.

To the best of our knowledge, all CC130 isolates that have been reported to date have been MSSA and have mainly been reported from animals, including cows and rats (25, 64, 67). While in the present study there was no evidence of any association between the patients from whom the CC130 MRSA isolates were recovered and any animals, it is interesting to speculate that the patients may have acquired these MRSA strains from animal sources. First, it is very difficult to completely rule out a link between patient and animal sources, particularly livestock, pets, and raw meat products. The fact that Ireland has a large agriculture industry, particularly dairy and beef farming, coupled with the fact that the lineages (CC130 and ST425) in which SCCmec XI was identified have previously been found to be mainly associated with cattle, indicates that the CC130 MRSA isolates in the present study may have been acquired from bovine sources. Interestingly, the ST425 isolate LGA251 reported on the Sanger Institute website was recovered from a bovine source (http://www.sanger.as.uk/pathogens). In addition, the DNA microarray revealed the absence of β-toxin-converting bacteriophages in the two CC130 MRSA isolates. Previous studies have shown that β-toxin-converting bacteriophages are rare among S. aureus isolates from bovine sources (36) but common among those from humans (30, 38, 39). The zoonotic spread of MRSA has been reported previously, and this may contribute to the burden of MRSA strains among humans (68, 69).

It has been reported previously that mutations in several S. aureus genes, including pbp4, can result in high-level β-lactam resistance (5). However, comparative DNA sequence analysis of the PBP genes from the two CC130 MRSA isolates and the CC130 MSSA isolate revealed that there were no differences in the PBP gene sequences in the MRSA isolates and the MSSA isolate (which also lacked mecA and the SCCmec cassette), indicating that it is the novel mecA gene and not alterations in PBPs that is responsible for the methicillin resistance phenotype in these isolates. Further studies involving controlled expression of the novel mecA gene in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus laboratory strains are under way in order to provide further evidence that the novel mecA gene identified in CC130 MRSA is responsible for the methicillin resistance phenotype in these isolates.

The identification of a mecA gene in MRSA that is not detected by mecA PCR, a DNA microarray, the GeneXpert rapid real-time PCR assay, or a PBP latex agglutination assay is alarming. Thus, with regard to infection prevention and therapy, isolates harboring this SCCmec element should be treated as MRSA, even though they are identified by PCR to be mecA negative. Therefore, isolates in which unexplained resistance phenotypes are detected, such as methicillin resistance in apparently mecA-negative S. aureus isolates, require further characterization and should be submitted to specialized laboratories until updated routine assays are available. Routine procedures for MRSA screening need to be reevaluated, and phenotypic approaches such as the use of chromogenic media should not be abandoned.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]


This work was supported by the Microbiology Research Unit, Dublin Dental University Hospital.

We thank the staff of the Irish National MRSA Reference Laboratory for identification of isolates as S. aureus, investigation of methicillin resistance, and AR typing. We also thank Antje Ruppelt (Faculty of Medicine, Dresden, Germany) and Elke Müller, Ines Engelmann, Gisela Rössler, and Jana Sachtschal (Alere Technologies, Jena, Germany) for technical assistance. We gratefully acknowledge Sebastian Günther (Veterinary Faculty, Free University Berlin) for providing the MSSA isolate from a brown rat, Helmut Hotzel (FLI Jena) for sequencing PCR products, and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Pathogen Group for the provision of the whole-genome sequence of the bovine MRSA isolate LGA251 (http://www.sanger.as.uk/pathogens).



Following submission of our study for peer-review evaluation, we became aware that García-Álvarez et al. had submitted a paper for publication describing the identification and characterization of SCCmec type XI in the bovine ST425 MRSA isolate LGA251 (L. García-Álvarez et al., Lancet Infect. Dis., 2011. [Epub ahead of print.] doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70126-8). This study was the first to identify the SCCmec XI element, the nomenclature for which was approved by the IWG-SCC.


Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aac.asm.org/.

[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 2 June 2011.


1. Abbott Y., Leggett B., Rossney A. S., Leonard F. C., Markey B. K. 2010. Isolation rates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in dogs, cats and horses in Ireland. Vet. Rec. 166:451–455 [PubMed]
2. Abbott Y., Leonard F. C., Markey B. K. 2010. Detection of three distinct genetic lineages in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from animals and veterinary personnel. Epidemiol. Infect. 138:764–771 [PubMed]
3. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410 [PubMed]
4. Baba T., et al. 2009. Complete genome sequence of Macrococcus caseolyticus strain JCSCS5402, reflecting the ancestral genome of the human-pathogenic staphylococci. J. Bacteriol. 191:1180–1190 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Banerjee R., Gretes M., Harlem C., Basuino L., Chambers H. F. 2010. A mecA-negative strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with high-level beta-lactam resistance contains mutations in three genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:4900–4902 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Barbier F., et al. 2010. Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in the community: high homology of SCCmec IVa between Staphylococcus epidermidis and major clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 202:270–281 [PubMed]
7. Berglund C., et al. 2008. Novel type of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain isolated in Sweden. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:3512–3516 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Berglund C., Soderquist B. 2008. The origin of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate at a neonatal ward in Sweden—possible horizontal transfer of a staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec between methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14:1048–1056 [PubMed]
9. Black C. C., et al. 2009. Identification of a predominant multilocus sequence type, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis cluster, and novel staphylococcal chromosomal cassette in clinical isolates of mecA-containing, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Vet. Microbiol. 139:333–338 [PubMed]
10. Bloemendaal A. L., Brouwer E. C., Fluit A. C. 2010. Methicillin resistance transfer from Staphylococcus epidermidis to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a patient during antibiotic therapy. PLoS One 5:e11841. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Boyle-Vavra S., Ereshefsky B., Wang C. C., Daum R. S. 2005. Successful multiresistant community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage from Taipei, Taiwan, that carries either the novel staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) type VT or SCCmec type IV. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4719–4730 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Carroll D., Kehoe M. A., Cavanagh D., Coleman D. C. 1995. Novel organization of the site-specific integration and excision recombination functions of the Staphylococcus aureus serotype F virulence-converting phages phi 13 and phi 42. Mol. Microbiol. 16:877–893 [PubMed]
13. CLSI 2006. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 16th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S16. CLSI, Wayne, PA
14. Enright M. C., Day N. P., Davies C. E., Peacock S. J., Spratt B. G. 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1008–1015 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Garza-Gonzalez E., et al. 2010. Diversity of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec structures in coagulase-negative staphylococci and relationship to drug resistance. J. Med. Microbiol. 59:323–329 [PubMed]
16. Garza-Gonzalez E., Morfin-Otero R., Llaca-Diaz J. M., Rodriguez-Noriega E. 2010. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) in methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. A review and the experience in a tertiary-care setting. Epidemiol. Infect. 138:645–654 [PubMed]
17. Hanssen A. M., Ericson Sollid J. U. 2006. SCCmec in staphylococci: genes on the move. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 46:8–20 [PubMed]
18. Hanssen A. M., Kjeldsen G., Sollid J. U. 2004. Local variants of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in sporadic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci: evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:285–296 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Holden M. T., et al. 2004. Complete genomes of two clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains: evidence for the rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:9786–9791 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Hyatt D., et al. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 11:119–130 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements (IWG-SCC) 2009. Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:4961–4967 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Ito T., Y, et al. 2001. Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1323–1336 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Ito T., et al. 2004. Novel type V staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec driven by a novel cassette chromosome recombinase, ccrC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2637–2651 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Jevons M. P. 1961. Celbenin-resistant staphylococci. Br. Med. J. i:124–125
25. Jorgensen H. J., Mork T., Caugant D. A., Kearns A., Rorvik L. M. 2005. Genetic variation among Staphylococcus aureus strains from Norwegian bulk milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:8352–8361 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Katayama Y., Ito T., Hiramatsu K. 2001. Genetic organization of the chromosome region surrounding mecA in clinical staphylococcal strains: role of IS431-mediated mecI deletion in expression of resistance in mecA-carrying, low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1955–1963 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Katayama Y., Ito T., Hiramatsu K. 2000. A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1549–1555 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Kreiswirth B. N., et al. 1983. The toxic shock syndrome exotoxin structural gene is not detectably transmitted by a prophage. Nature 305:709–712 [PubMed]
29. Kuroda M., et al. 2001. Whole genome sequencing of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 357:1225–1240 [PubMed]
30. Luedicke C., Slickers P., Ehricht R., Monecke S. 2010. Molecular fingerprinting of Staphylococcus aureus from bone and joint infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 29:457–463 [PubMed]
31. Ma X. X., et al. 2002. Novel type of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec identified in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1147–1152 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Maeda Y., et al. 2007. Community-associated MRSA SCCmec type IVd in Irish equids. Vet. Rec. 161:35–36 [PubMed]
33. Malachowa N., Deleo F. R. 2010. Mobile genetic elements of Staphylococcus aureus. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67:3057–3071 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. McCarthy A. J., Lindsay J. A. 2010. Genetic variation in Staphylococcus aureus surface and immune evasion genes is lineage associated: implications for vaccine design and host-pathogen interactions. BMC Microbiol. 10:173–188 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Monecke S., Jatzwauk L., Weber S., Slickers P., Ehricht R. 2008. DNA microarray-based genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from Eastern Saxony. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14:534–545 [PubMed]
36. Monecke S., Kuhnert P., Hotzel H., Slickers P., Ehricht R. 2007. Microarray based study on virulence-associated genes and resistance determinants of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 125:128–140 [PubMed]
37. Monecke S., Leube L., Ehricht R. 2003. Simple and robust array-based methods for the parallel detection of resistance genes of Staphylococcus aureus. Genome Lett. 2:106–118
38. Monecke S., Luedicke C., Slickers P., Ehricht R. 2009. Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in asymptomatic carriers. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 28:1159–1165 [PubMed]
39. Monecke S., et al. 2006. Microarray-based characterisation of a Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive community-acquired strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12:718–728 [PubMed]
40. Mongkolrattanothai K., Boyle S., Murphy T. V., Daum R. S. 2004. Novel non-mecA-containing staphylococcal chromosomal cassette composite island containing pbp4 and tagF genes in a commensal staphylococcal species: a possible reservoir for antibiotic resistance islands in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1823–1836 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Moodley A., et al. 2006. spa typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from domestic animals and veterinary staff in the UK and Ireland. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 58:1118–1123 [PubMed]
42. Novick R. 1967. Properties of a cryptic high-frequency transducing phage in Staphylococcus aureus. Virology 33:155–166 [PubMed]
43. O'Brien F. G., et al. 2004. Diversity among community isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Australia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3185–3190 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Oliveira D. C., de Lencastre H. 2002. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2155–2161 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Oliveira D. C., Milheirico C., de Lencastre H. 2006. Redefining a structural variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, SCCmec type VI. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3457–3459 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Otto M. 2010. Staphylococcus aureus toxin gene hitchhikes on a transferable antibiotic resistance element. Virulence 1:49–51 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Paez-Espino D., Tamames J., de Lorenzo V., Canovas D. 2009. Microbial responses to environmental arsenic. Biometals 22:117–130 [PubMed]
48. Reynolds P. E., Brown D. F. 1985. Penicillin-binding proteins of beta-lactam-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Effect of growth conditions. FEBS Lett. 192:28–32 [PubMed]
49. Rice P., Longden I., Bleasby A. 2000. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 16:276–277 [PubMed]
50. Rossney A. S., English L. F., Keane C. T. 1990. Coagulase testing compared with commercial kits for routinely identifying Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Pathol. 43:246–252 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Rossney A. S., et al. 2006. Epidemiological typing of MRSA isolates from blood cultures taken in Irish hospitals participating in the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (1999-2003). Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 25:79–89 [PubMed]
52. Rossney A. S., et al. 2007. The emergence and importation of diverse genotypes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) harboring the Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene (pvl) reveal that pvl is a poor marker for community-acquired MRSA strains in Ireland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2554–2563 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Ruppe E., et al. 2009. Diversity of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec structures in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains among outpatients from four countries. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:442–449 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Rutherford K., et al. 2000. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 16:944–945 [PubMed]
55. Schnellmann C., et al. 2006. Presence of new mecA and mph(C) variants conferring antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus spp. isolated from the skin of horses before and after clinic admission. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4444–4454 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Shore A., Rossney A. S., Keane C. T., Enright M. C., Coleman D. C. 2005. Seven novel variants of the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Ireland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:2070–2083 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Shore A. C., et al. 2010. Identification and characterization of the multidrug resistance gene cfr in a Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive sequence type 8 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus IVa (USA300) isolate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:4978–4984 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Shore A. C., et al. 2011. Characterization of a novel arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec composite island with significant homology to Staphylococcus epidermidis ACME type II in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus genotype ST22-MRSA-IV. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:1896–1905 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Shore A. C., et al. 2010. Enhanced discrimination of highly clonal ST22-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus IV isolates achieved by combining spa, dru, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing data. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:1839–1852 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Shore A. C., et al. 2008. Detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec-associated DNA segments in multiresistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis ccrAB4 in both methicillin-resistant S. aureus and MSSA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:4407–4419 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Smyth D. S., Wong A., Robinson D. A. 2011. Cross-species spread of SCCmec IV subtypes in staphylococci. Infect. Genet. Evol. 11:446–453 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Soderquist B., Berglund C. 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus saprophyticus in Sweden carries various types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15:1176–1178 [PubMed]
63. Song M. D., Wachi M., Doi M., Ishino F., Matsuhashi M. 1987. Evolution of an inducible penicillin-target protein in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by gene fusion. FEBS Lett. 221:167–171 [PubMed]
64. Sung J. M., Lloyd D. H., Lindsay J. A. 2008. Staphylococcus aureus host specificity: comparative genomics of human versus animal isolates by multi-strain microarray. Microbiology 154:1949–1959 [PubMed]
65. Tsubakishita S., Kuwahara-Arai K., Baba T., Hiramatsu K. 2010. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec-like element in Macrococcus caseolyticus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:1469–1475 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Tsubakishita S., Kuwahara-Arai K., Sasaki T., Hiramatsu K. 2010. Origin and molecular evolution of the determinant of methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:4352–4359 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. van de Giessen A. W., et al. 2009. Occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in rats living on pig farms. Prev. Vet. Med. 91:270–273 [PubMed]
68. Van Den Broek I., et al. 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in people living and working in pig farms. Epidemiol. Infect. 137:700–708 [PubMed]
69. Weese J. S. 2010. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals. ILAR J. 51:233–244 [PubMed]
70. Wisplinghoff H., et al. 2003. Related clones containing SCCmec type IV predominate among clinically significant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3574–3579 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Wolk D. M., et al. 2009. Rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in wound specimens and blood cultures: multicenter preclinical evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert MRSA/SA skin and soft tissue and blood culture assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:823–826 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
72. Wu S., de Lencastre H., Tomasz A. 1998. Genetic organization of the mecA region in methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus sciuri. J. Bacteriol. 180:236–242 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Wu S., Piscitelli C., de Lencastre H., Tomasz A. 1996. Tracking the evolutionary origin of the methicillin resistance gene: cloning and sequencing of a homologue of mecA from a methicillin susceptible strain of Staphylococcus sciuri. Microb. Drug Resist. 2:435–441 [PubMed]
74. Yokoi K. J., et al. 2011. Characterization of the histidine decarboxylase gene of Staphylococcus epidermidis TYH1 coded on the staphylococcal cassette chromosome. Gene 477:32–41 [PubMed]
75. Zhang K., McClure J. A., Elsayed S., Conly J. M. 2009. Novel staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type, tentatively designated type VIII, harboring class A mec and type 4 ccr gene complexes in a Canadian epidemic strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:531–540 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Zong Z., Lu X. 2010. Characterization of a new SCCmec element in Staphylococcus cohnii. PLoS One 5:e14016. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...