• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Curr Opin Cardiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC May 1, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3145336
NIHMSID: NIHMS313349

Genetics of Sudden Cardiac Death Syndromes

Abstract

Purpose of review

To survey recent developments in the field of genetics encompassing discovery of new candidate genes, new diagnostic strategies and new therapies for sudden cardiac death (SCD) syndromes.

Recent findings

In addition to new mutations in known SCD genes, several novel genes not previously implicated in SCD causation have been found, particularly in long QT syndrome (e.g., KCNJ5, AKAP9, SNTA1), idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (DPP6, KCNJ8), dilated cardiomyopathy (e.g., NEBL) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (e.g. NEXN). Genetic SCD animal models have provided novel insights in the cellular mechanism and pathogenesis of nearly all the major SCD syndromes, which has led to several new drug therapies for patients with genetic arrhythmia syndromes (e.g., flecainide in Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia). Furthermore, genetic contributions to acquired heart diseases are increasingly being recognized. For example, a 21q21 locus is strongly associated with ventricular fibrillation after myocardial infarction. Near this locus is CXADR, a gene encoding a viral receptor implicated in myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy. Finally, common variants in cardiac ion channels and proteins likely contribute to common cardiac phenotypes.

Summary

Major strides have been made uncovering new genes, mechanisms and syndromes that have significantly advanced the diagnosis and treatment of genetic SCD disorders.

Keywords: sudden cardiac death, genetics, ventricular arrhythmia, mutation

Introduction

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major public health problem in the western world with over 200,000 deaths reported annually in the USA only.(1) The underlying mechanism is ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VA) in the overwhelming majority. However, the underlying substrate varies: ischemic heart disease in 75–80% cases; idiopathic cardiomyopathy in 10–15% and 1–2% due to rare monogenic mutations in cardiac ion channels or associated proteins.(2) Even though the latter constitutes only a small portion of SCDs, their study is imperative in understanding the mechanisms of SCD. In fact, the concept of evaluating the molecular mechanism of a monogenic arrhythmia syndrome to provide clues in probing the mechanism and improve therapy of more commonly acquired arrhythmogenic diseases has been proposed.(3) ? For example, mutations in the RyR2 Ca2+-release channel cause CPVT; acquired RyR2 dysfunction has been implicated in VA and SCD in heart failure and may contribute to the pathogenesis of other diseases like idiopathic cardiomyopathy or atrial fibrillation, with increased ‘SR Ca2+-leak’ being the common underlying mechanism. Furthermore, common variants in SCD genes may increase arrhythmia risk associated with the ‘environmental’ factors (e.g., drugs, electrolytes, ischemia).(4, 5)

Newer study methods in genetics promise to enhance our understanding of disease mechanisms. For example, genome wide association studies (GWAS), a high-throughput genotyping of a large number of SNPs correlating them to a phenotype, is clearly a step forward in investigating biologic pathways of disease causation.(6) Using this technique SNP ‘rs2824292’ at locus 21q21 has been strongly associated with ventricular fibrillation after acute myocardial infarction, a major cause of SCD of which very little is known.(7) Interestingly, the gene closest to this SNP is CXADR, which encodes a viral receptor previously implicated in myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy and has been identified as a modulator of cardiac conduction, but not implicated in arrhythmia susceptibility.(7) However, more studies need to be done to uncover a causal relationship, if one exists.

The remainder of the review focuses on new candidate genes and new developments in diagnosis and treatment of sudden cardiac death syndromes subdivided in two major categories (Table 1): Syndromes associated with structurally normal hearts (Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia, Brugada Syndrome, long and short QT syndrome, Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation) and syndromes associated with cardiomyopathic lesions (Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy, Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, LV Non-Compaction):

Table 1
Phenotype, genotype and underlying arrhythmia mechanisms of familial sudden cardiac death syndromes. Genes in bold are discussed more extensively in the text.

Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT)

The number of mutations in the RYR2(155) and CASQ2(15) linked to CPVT continues to grow since they were first described almost a decade ago (http://www.fsm.it/cardmoc/ for updated list).(810) Although the RyR2 binding proteins triadin and junctin have been suggested from murine models as additional candidates,(11, 12) human mutations have not yet been found. Among patients with exertional syncope, polymorphic VT and normal QTc, nearly 50% have putative RyR2 mutations causing CPVT(13) and nearly 20% of these RyR2 mutations are de novo.(13) Since sporadic cases of CPVT can be due to germ-line mosaicism in one of the parents,(13, 14) systematic genetic screening of the proband’s siblings should be done even if standard methods fail to clearly detect the mutation in the parents.(14) A tiered-approach in screening for RyR2 mutations due to clustering of known CPVT mutations in certain exons can be used to lower the cost.(13) ? It can be expected that newer technologies like the ‘next-generation’ gene sequencing will not only make it faster and cheaper to screen the entire RyR2 but will also abolish the need for sequencing these ‘hot regions’ for mutations.

Mechanistically, CPVT is a triggered arrhythmia that occurs due to delayed after-depolarization (DAD) due to spontaneous SR Ca2+-release during catecholamine surge.(15) Recent work implicates Purkinje fibers as being more arrhythmogenic than ventricular myocytes(16, 17) and may well be the source of bidirectional VT.(18) Cardiac sympathectomy has been suggested to control CPVT in patients refractory to β-blockers,(19) although relief after this surgical procedure can be temporary or of delayed onset.(20) The recent discovery that the class 1c antiarrhythmic agent flecainide directly targets the molecular defect in CPVT by virtue of blocking the RyR2 and cardiac Na+ channels downstream in the β-adrenergic cascade provides a new therapeutic option for CPVT patients refractory to β-blockers or sympathectomy.(2124) Flecainide suppressed DADs in mutant Purkinje fibers,(16) and effectively prevented CPVT in mice and humans.(2124) An international randomized placebo-controlled trial of flecainide in CPVT is currently open for enrollment (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01117454).

Brugada Syndrome (BrS)

Some estimate that BrS may account for up to 50% of all SCDs in young individuals without structural heart disease.(25) ? Patients with BrS display a characteristic coved-type ST segment elevation followed by a descending negative T wave in at least one right precordial lead (V1 to V3), which is considered diagnostic of BrS.(25) Although nearly 300 putative ‘loss of function’ mutations in the SCNA5 have been described,(26, 27) emerging epidemiologic data indicates that genetic background beyond SCNA5 mutations may be required for the BrS phenotype.(28) Since SCN5A mutations are seen in only ~20% of all BrS patients(26, 27) this suggests that multiple molecular mechanisms culminating into loss of function of SCNA5 may be the final common mechanism for BrS.(29) Mutations in the gene encoding glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1-like enzyme by virtue of Na+ current reduction has been linked to BrS.(30) Furthermore, ‘loss of function’ mutations in cardiac Ca2+ channel complex,(31, 32) and mutation in KCNE3 leading to increase in the amplitude of Ito current(33) have also been implicated in BrS. While the genetic cause of BrS remains elusive in the remaining 70–80% patients.(26)

The class Ia anti arrhythmic agent and Ito current blocker quinidine seems quite effective in suppressing VA in BrS patients.(34) Particularly challenging is treatment of electrical storm in BrS patients which has been anecdotally treated with disopyrmide,(35) orciprenaline(36) and quinine.(37)

Long QT syndrome (LQTS)

To date, more than 700 mutations in 12 genes have been identified in ~70% of patients with LQTS. However, genetic test results for long QT syndrome can be misleading because rare variants can be non-pathogenic;(38) require a common polymorphism in the target gene(39) or a genetic modifier like NOS1AP(40) to display the phenotype. Furthermore, large genomic rearrangements of the canonical LQTS-susceptibility genes should be suspected in patients with a strong clinical phenotype who fail to reveal point mutations with conventional genetic testing.(41) Compound and digenic heterozygosity causing a more severe phenotype is observed in 5–10% of LQTS patients.(42) Recently, a mutation in the K+ channel Kir3.4 resulting in a channel trafficking defect and reduction in the IKACh current has been described in autosomal dominant LQTS.(43) This discovery is noteworthy since unlike in the atrium, the IKACh current is generally not considered important for repolarization of the ventricle.(43) Clinically, echocardiography has been suggested as a complementary tool to QTc assessment in risk stratification of LQTS mutation carriers.(44)

Insight in pathogenesis of putative mutations causing LQTS is usually obtained from studies in heterologous cell expression system or genetic animal models. Due to their inherent limitations, the underlying mechanism by which a mutation causes LQTS may remain undetermined(45) or show discrepancy between in vitro and clinical phenotype.(46) To address this issue, investigators derived pluripotent stem cells from patients with LQTS-1 and directed them to differentiate into cardiac myocytes.(45) As a proof of concept, these myocytes did exhibit the abnormal biophysical and pharmacological phenotype that one would expect due to mutated Iks suggesting that induced pluripotent stem-cell models can recapitulate aspects of genetic cardiac diseases and can be used as an alternative method of studying their phenotype.(45) This technique has also been utilized to study LQTS-2 syndrome where the patient-specific human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) not only accurately model the human disease but also help in individualizing drug testing.(47)?

Therapeutically, recent work suggests that the late Na+ current blocker ranolazine shortens QT and may be beneficial for LQT patients with Na+ channel mutations (LQT3).(48)

Short QT syndrome (SQTS)

SQTS is an inherited primary arrhythmogenic cardiac disorder characterized by abnormally short QT interval and a predisposition to development of atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias.(49) Five subtypes have been described due to gain of function mutation in genes encoding K-channels (KCNH2, KCNQ1 and KCNJ2; types 1–3) or loss of function mutation in the gene encoding the L-type Ca channel (CACNA1C) or its beta-subunit CACNB2b (types 4–5).(49) ? The common underlying mechanism is a shortening of action potential duration which can generate a substrate for reentry.

Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation (IVF)

IVF – spontaneous VF without identifiable structural or electrical heart disease – may account for up to 10% of sudden death in the young.(5052) Haplotype-sharing analysis has identified a genetic basis for IVF.(53) The shared chromosomal segment contained the DPP6 gene, which encodes a putative regulator of the transient outward Ito current.(54) DPP6 mRNA levels were increased 20-fold in hearts of human carriers in one study.(53) To date this seems to be a founder risk locus but nonetheless it suggests that an increase in DPP6 imparts a higher risk for VF.

Furthermore, previously thought to be a benign and common ECG finding present in up to 5% of the population, three separate case-control studies(5557) suggest that ‘J-point elevation’ (manifested either as terminal QRS slurring or notching, or ST-segment elevation with upper concavity and prominent T waves in infero-lateral leads) is significantly more prevalent (16–60%) in patients with IVF. Mutations in genes encoding subunits of L-type Ca2+ channel (CACNA1C, CACNB2, and CACNA2D1)(58) and a subunit of the KATP channel encoded by KCNJ8(59) have been implicated in this new ‘J-wave syndrome’ or ‘early repolarization syndrome’.(60)

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC)

ARVC is an autosomal-dominant syndrome with variable penetrance in up to 50% of patients characterized by progressive myocardial atrophy with fibro-fatty replacement predominantly in the right ventricle.(61) Since the first description of mutations in plakoglobin causing ARVC in 2000,(62) many more desmosomal protein mutations have been discovered.(63) Even though mutations in the desmosomal protein plakophilin-2 (PKP2) are most common (25–40%) in ARVC patients,(63, 64) they may not be pathogenic in isolation, as indicated by reports of low-penetrance of some heterozygous PKP2 mutations,(65) prevalence of certain disease-causing missense PKP2 mutations in healthy controls,(66) and prevalence of mutations in multiple desmosomal genes in 4–42% of ARVC patients.(63, 65, 67) Additionally, a gene-dose effect is suggested by the requirement of compound or digenic heterozygosity (additional variants in the same or associated desmosomal genes, respectively) in order to manifest an ARVC phenotype(63, 65, 67) which is also significantly associated with increased likelihood of SCD and LV systolic dysfunction.(63, 64, 67) Furthermore, nonsense or frame-shift mutations in PKP2 alone – in contrast to missense mutations – often do not result in clinical disease, which suggests a dominant-negative effect of missense mutations when compared to haplo-insufficiency associated with truncated mutations.(63, 65) Therefore, genotyping in clinical practice should include all the desmosomal proteins even if an index mutation is discovered, especially in patients with a severe phenotype or LV dysfunction.(65, 67) The latter seems more common with mutations in desmoglein-2 (50%), plakophilin-2 (10%), and desmoplakin.(63)

Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)

Familial DCM is associated with rare variants in more than 20 sarcomeric and structural proteins but known gene mutations only explain the disease in a small percentage of patients. Not surprisingly, common variants in these genes may also increase susceptibility to DCM.(68) Even though considered a separate entity, studies implicate mutations in genes associated with familial DCM in a small subset of patients with peripartum or pregnancy-associated DCM.(69, 70)

A recent new addition to the long list of DCM candidate genes is nebulette (NEBL), which encodes a 107 kDa protein that aligns thin filaments and connects them with the myocardial Z-disk. Novel nebulette mutations (K60N, Q128R, G202R, and A592E) were identified in patients with DCM, endocardial fibroelastosis, and cardiac failure.(71) Another is Dynamin-1-like (Dnm1l) gene, which is known to be critical for mitochondrial fission and has also been implicated in causing DCM by reducing levels of mitochondrial enzyme complexes and cardiac ATP depletion.(72)

Influence of common polymorphisms on DCM susceptibility was evaluated in a case-control study identifying a polymorphism (rs1739843) in intron 2 of the HSPB7 (encoding the small heat shock protein cvHsp, also called HspB7) being associated with susceptibility to DCM. However, the functional significance of this variant is presently unknown and needs further evaluation.(73) Furthermore, classically implicated in causing ARVC, desmosomal mutations occur in at least 5% of patients with DCM with a phenotype essentially indistinguishable from DCM patients without desmosomal mutations, except for a higher prevalence of exercise-induced ventricular ectopy.(74)

Clinically, it is not uncommon to see the degree of ischemic cardiomyopathy often out of proportion to the amount of overtly infarcted myocardium suggesting involvement of other mechanisms. One such is Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain-Containing Protein (PHD) prolyl hydroxylases which are oxygen-sensitive enzymes that transduce changes in oxygen availability into changes in the stability of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) transcription factor, a master regulator of genes that promote survival in a low-oxygen environment.(75) Inactivation of cardiac-specific PHD and subsequent HIF activation causes structural, histological, and functional changes akin to chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy, suggesting its causal role and possible therapeutic target for pharmacological manipulation in ischemic cardiomyopathy, the leading cause of SCD from an acquired disease.(75)

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)

Familial HCM is usually caused by mutations in genes encoding sarcomeric proteins. Among them, mutations in β-myosin heavy, cardiac myosin-binding protein C, cardiac troponin I, and cardiac troponin T account for nearly 50% of reported cases.

Recently, missense mutations that cause defective interaction between Nexilin and α-actin have been described in HCM.(76) Nexilin (NXN) is a cardiac Z-disc protein that has a crucial function to protect cardiac Z-discs from forces generated within the sarcomere.(76) Pathologic hypertrophy in HCM is associated with α-MHC downregulation and β-MHC induction representing a fetal state of MHC expression. Brg1, a chromatin-remodelling protein, has a critical role in regulating cardiac growth, differentiation and gene expression and is reactivated by cardiac stresses to induce this pathologic MHC shift.(77) Preventing Brg1 re-expression decreases hypertrophy and reverses this pathologic MHC switch suggesting it to be a potential therapeutic target for cardiac hypertrophy and failure.(77) Amidst general cardiac hypertrophy, myocyte enhancer factor-2 mediated focal myocyte necrosis and scarring may lead to heterogeneous scarring that predisposes to VA.(78) These show that novel structural genes (NXN) and pathogenic mechanisms in causation of HCM, a common cause of SCD continue to be discovered, re-emphasizing the importance of future research in this area.

Increased myocardial collagen synthesis in HCM mutation carriers often antedates overt clinical hypertrophy and may identify persons at risk for arrhythmias, sudden death, or heart failure even before manifestation of overt myocardial fibrosis, a hallmark of HCM and a likely substrate for VA and heart failure.(79) Mechanistically, non-myocyte activation of Tgf-β signaling is pivotal for increased fibrosis in HCM.(80) Therefore, prophylactic pharmacologic inhibition of Tgf-β cascade may prevent fibrosis and heart failure and warrants further study in patients with sarcomeric gene mutations.(80)

Another independent mechanism for VA risk in HCM appears to be the increased myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity caused by several mutations in troponin T or I. Even in absence of cardiac remodeling, increased myofilament Ca2+ sensitization reduces effective refractory period, greater beat to beat variability of APD and increased dispersion of ventricular conduction velocities at fast heart rates in mice.(81) This observation has potential therapeutic implications and should be explored further.

Left Ventricular Non-Compaction (LVNC)

LVNC – a rare disorder characterized by multiple deep trabeculations within the LV myocardium – is increasingly being recognized as a cause of VA and SCD in young patients.(82) Overlapping genetic predisposition to LVNC, HCM and dilated CM, suggesting a continuum of disease associated with sarcomeric gene mutations has been proposed.(83) Interestingly, distal chromosome deletion at 22q11.2(84) and 1p36(85, 86) while previously associated with atrial and ventricular septal defects, have been more recently described in patients with LVNC.

Conclusion

Genetic testing does not only impact care of inherited SCD syndrome patients but benefits also their often asymptomatic, disease carrying relatives by institution of prophylactic treatment.(87) At the other end of the spectrum, postmortem screening for cardiac channelopathies in SCD victims has been advocated; newer technologies are emerging to accomplish this more effectively.(88, 89) Furthermore, discovery of novel SCD syndromes (e.g., IVF) provides the opportunity to decipher the genetic contribution to relatively well characterized clinical ECG phenotypes (e.g., J-wave).(57, 90, 91) Finally, new discoveries in genetics enable a better understanding of fundamental mechanisms of SCD that may lead to better treatments in the future.(3)

Key Points

  • Novel gene discoveries have been made in many SCD syndromes
  • New genetic SCD animal models have provided novel mechanistic insights of nearly all the major SCD syndromes, which has led to new drug therapies for patients with genetic SCD syndromes
  • New studies identify genetic contributions to arrhythmia risk after myocardial infarction
  • Common variants in cardiac ion channels and proteins likely contribute to common cardiac phenotypes

Acknowledgements

Funding support: This work was supported in part by the US National Institutes of Health grants HL88635 and HL71670 (to BCK) and by the American Heart Association Established Investigator Award 0840071N (to BCK).

We thank Prince Kannankeril and Jessica Delaney, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA, and Christian van der Werf, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, for their expert editorial suggestions.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

1. Myerburg RJ. Scientific gaps in the prediction and prevention of sudden cardiac death. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;13(7):709–723. [PubMed]
2. Zipes D, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac Electrophysiology: from cell to bedside. 5th ed. Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
3. Knollmann BC, Roden DM. A genetic framework for improving arrhythmia therapy. Nature. 2008 Feb 21;451(7181):929–936. [PubMed]. A state of art review article emphasizing the mechanism-based approach in improving arrhythmia therapy.
4. Albert CM, MacRae CA, Chasman DI, VanDenburgh M, Buring JE, Manson JE, et al. Common variants in cardiac ion channel genes are associated with sudden cardiac death. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Jun 1;3(3):222–229. [PubMed]. A series of cohort studies demonstrating the importance of common intronic variants in KCNQ1 and SCN5A for sudden death risk.
5. Ran Y, Chen J, Li N, Zhang W, Feng L, Wang R, et al. Common RyR2 variants associate with ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in chronic heart failure. Clin Sci (Lond) 2010;119(5):215–223. [PubMed]
6. Manolio TA. Genomewide association studies and assessment of the risk of disease. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 8;363(2):166–176. [PubMed]. A review article describing the use of genome-wide association studies in assessing the risk of disease and associated challenges inherent to this approach.
7. Bezzina CR, Pazoki R, Bardai A, Marsman RF, de Jong JS, Blom MT, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus at 21q21 for ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction. Nat Genet. 2010 Aug;42(8):688–691. [PubMed]. A GWAS study implicating a novel susceptibility locus for ventricular fibrillation in patients with first myocardial infarction.
8. Priori SG, Napolitano C, Tiso N, Memmi M, Vignati G, Bloise R, et al. Mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene (hRyR2) underlie catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2001 Jan 16;103(2):196–200. [PubMed]
9. Lahat H, Pras E, Olender T, Avidan N, Ben-Asher E, Man O, et al. A missense mutation in a highly conserved region of CASQ2 is associated with autosomal recessive catecholamine-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in Bedouin families from Israel. Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Dec;69(6):1378–1384. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Postma AV, Denjoy I, Hoorntje TM, Lupoglazoff JM, Da Costa A, Sebillon P, et al. Absence of calsequestrin 2 causes severe forms of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circ Res. 2002 Oct 18;91(8):e21–e26. [PubMed]
11. Chopra N, Yang T, Asghari P, Moore ED, Huke S, Akin B, et al. Ablation of triadin causes loss of cardiac Ca2+ release units, impaired excitation-contraction coupling, and cardiac arrhythmias. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 5;106(18):7636–7641. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Yuan Q, Fan GC, Dong M, Altschafl B, Diwan A, Ren X, et al. Sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium overloading in junctin deficiency enhances cardiac contractility but increases ventricular automaticity. Circulation. 2007 Jan 23;115(3):300–309. [PubMed]
13. Medeiros-Domingo A, Bhuiyan ZA, Tester DJ, Hofman N, Bikker H, van Tintelen JP, et al. The RYR2-encoded ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel in patients diagnosed previously with either catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or genotype negative, exercise-induced long QT syndrome: a comprehensive open reading frame mutational analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 24;54(22):2065–2074. [PubMed]. A study showing that nearly 50% of patients with exercise-induced syncope and normal QT have putative RYR2 mutations. A tiered targeting strategy for CPVT genetic testing is proposed due to presence of mutations in certain exons only.
14. Roux-Buisson N, Egea G, Denjoy I, Guicheney P, Lunardi J. Germline and somatic mosaicism for a mutation of the ryanodine receptor type 2 gene: implication for genetic counselling and patient caring. Europace. 2010 Sep 17; [PubMed]
15. Knollmann BC, Chopra N, Hlaing T, Akin B, Yang T, Ettensohn K, et al. Casq2 deletion causes sarcoplasmic reticulum volume increase, premature Ca2+ release, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. J Clin Invest. 2006 Sep;116(9):2510–2520. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Kang G, Giovannone SF, Liu N, Liu FY, Zhang J, Priori SG, et al. Purkinje cells from RyR2 mutant mice are highly arrhythmogenic but responsive to targeted therapy. Circ Res. 2010 Aug 20;107(4):512–519. [PubMed]. A study implicating Purkinje cells as the source of ventricular arrhythmia in mice with RyR2 mutation and responsive to flecainide which is effective in CPVT.
17. Herron TJ, Milstein ML, Anumonwo J, Priori SG, Jalife J. Purkinje cell calcium dysregulation is the cellular mechanism that underlies catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Aug;7(8):1122–1128. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Cerrone M, Noujaim SF, Tolkacheva EG, Talkachou A, O'Connell R, Berenfeld O, et al. Arrhythmogenic mechanisms in a mouse model of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circ Res. 2007 Nov 9;101(10):1039–1048. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Wilde AA, Bhuiyan ZA, Crotti L, Facchini M, De Ferrari GM, Paul T, et al. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation for catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 8;358(19):2024–2029. [PubMed]
20. Gopinathannair R, Olshansky B, Iannettoni M, Mazur A. Delayed maximal response to left cardiac sympathectomy for catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Europace. 2010 Jul;12(7):1035–1039. [PubMed]
21. Watanabe H, Chopra N, Laver D, Hwang HS, Davies SS, Roach DE, et al. Flecainide prevents catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in mice and humans. Nat Med. 2009 Apr;15(4):380–383. [PubMed]. A landmark study showing that drug therapy with flecainide that directly targets the underlying defect is highly effective in CPVT.
22. Hilliard FA, Steele DS, Laver D, Yang Z, Le Marchand SJ, Chopra N, et al. Flecainide inhibits arrhythmogenic Ca2+ waves by open state block of ryanodine receptor Ca2+ release channels and reduction of Ca2+ spark mass. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010 Feb;48(2):293–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Knollmann BC. Power and pitfalls of using transgenic mice to optimize therapy for CPVT: A need for prospective placebo-controlled clinical trials in genetic arrhythmia disorders. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jul 29; [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Biernacka EK, Hoffman P. Efficacy of flecainide in a patient with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Europace. 2010 Aug 26; [PubMed]
25. Zipes D, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac Electrophysiology: from cell to bedside. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
26. Kapplinger JD, Tester DJ, Alders M, Benito B, Berthet M, Brugada J, et al. An international compendium of mutations in the SCN5A-encoded cardiac sodium channel in patients referred for Brugada syndrome genetic testing. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jan;7(1):33–46. [PubMed]. A comprehensive evaluation of BrS genetics adding 200 new BrS associated mutations to the public domain. It also suggests that rare mutations can be innocuous and need to be differentiated from pathogenic mutations.
27. Capulzini L, Brugada P, Brugada J, Brugada R. Arrhythmia and right heart disease: from genetic basis to clinical practice. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):963–983. [PubMed]
28. Probst V, Wilde AA, Barc J, Sacher F, Babuty D, Mabo P, et al. SCN5A mutations and the role of genetic background in the pathophysiology of Brugada syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009 Dec;2(6):552–557. [PubMed]. A landmark report demonstrating that additional genetic predisposition may be required to manifest the disease phenotype.
29. Roden DM. Brugada syndrome: lots of questions, some answers. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jan;7(1):47–49. [PubMed]
30. London B, Michalec M, Mehdi H, Zhu X, Kerchner L, Sanyal S, et al. Mutation in glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1 like gene (GPD1-L) decreases cardiac Na+ current and causes inherited arrhythmias. Circulation. 2007 Nov 13;116(20):2260–2268. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Antzelevitch C, Pollevick GD, Cordeiro JM, Casis O, Sanguinetti MC, Aizawa Y, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the cardiac calcium channel underlie a new clinical entity characterized by ST-segment elevation, short QT intervals, and sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 2007 Jan 30;115(4):442–449. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Burashnikov E, Pfeiffer R, Barajas-Martinez H, Delpon E, Hu D, Desai M, et al. Mutations in the Cardiac L-Type Calcium Channel Associated with Inherited J Wave Syndromes and Sudden Cardiac Death. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Sep 2; [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Delpon E, Cordeiro JM, Nunez L, Thomsen PE, Guerchicoff A, Pollevick GD, et al. Functional effects of KCNE3 mutation and its role in the development of Brugada syndrome. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008 Aug;1(3):209–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Belhassen B, Glick A, Viskin S. Excellent long-term reproducibility of the electrophysiologic efficacy of quinidine in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and Brugada syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32(3):294–301. [PubMed]
35. Sumi S, Maruyama S, Shiga Y, Kodama S, Miyoshi K, Tojou H, et al. High efficacy of disopyramide in the management of ventricular fibrillation storms in a patient with Brugada syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Jun 1;33(6):e53–e56. [PubMed]
36. Schweizer PA, Becker R, Katus HA, Thomas D. Successful acute and long-term management of electrical storm in Brugada syndrome using orciprenaline and quinine/quinidine. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Jul;99(7):467–470. [PubMed]
37. Mehrotra S, Juneja R, Naik N, Pavri BB. Successful Use of Quinine in the Treatment of Electrical Storm in a Child with Brugada Syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Oct 6; [PubMed]
38. Tester DJ, Valdivia C, Harris-Kerr C, Alders M, Salisbury BA, Wilde AA, et al. Epidemiologic, molecular, and functional evidence suggest A572D-SCN5A should not be considered an independent LQT3-susceptibility mutation. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jul;7(7):912–919. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Nof E, Cordeiro JM, Perez GJ, Scornik FS, Calloe K, Love B, et al. A common single nucleotide polymorphism can exacerbate long-QT type 2 syndrome leading to sudden infant death. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Apr;3(2):199–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Tomas M, Napolitano C, De Giuli L, Bloise R, Subirana I, Malovini A, et al. Polymorphisms in the NOS1AP gene modulate QT interval duration and risk of arrhythmias in the long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 15;55(24):2745–2752. [PubMed]
41. Tester DJ, Benton AJ, Train L, Deal B, Baudhuin LM, Ackerman MJ. Prevalence and spectrum of large deletions or duplications in the major long QT syndrome-susceptibility genes and implications for long QT syndrome genetic testing. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Oct 15;106(8):1124–1128. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Itoh H, Shimizu W, Hayashi K, Yamagata K, Sakaguchi T, Ohno S, et al. Long QT syndrome with compound mutations is associated with a more severe phenotype: a Japanese multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Oct;7(10):1411–1418. [PubMed]
43. Yang Y, Liang B, Liu J, Li J, Grunnet M, Olesen SP, et al. Identification of a Kir3.4 Mutation in Congenital Long QT Syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Jun 2;. A report indicating a new concept in LQT mechanism.
44. Haugaa KH, Amlie JP, Berge KE, Leren TP, Smiseth OA, Edvardsen T. Transmural Differences in Myocardial Contraction in Long-QT Syndrome: Mechanical Consequences of Ion Channel Dysfunction. Circulation. 2010 Oct 5;122(14):1355–1363. [PubMed]
45. Moretti A, Bellin M, Welling A, Jung CB, Lam JT, Bott-Flugel L. et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7;363(15):1397–1409. [PubMed]. A landmark study demonstrating proof of principle of using patient derived pluripotent stem cells for studying genotype-phenotype relationship in arrhythmic disorders.
46. Winbo A, Diamant UB, Stattin EL, Jensen SM, Rydberg A. Low incidence of sudden cardiac death in a Swedish Y111C type 1 long-QT syndrome population. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009 Dec;2(6):558–564. [PubMed]
47. Itzhaki I, Maizels L, Huber I, Zwi-Dantsis L, Caspi O, Winterstern A, et al. Modelling the long QT syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2011 Jan 16; [PubMed]
48. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Schwarz KQ, Rosero S, McNitt S, Robinson JL. Ranolazine shortens repolarization in patients with sustained inward sodium current due to type-3 long-QT syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Dec;19(12):1289–1293. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Patel C, Yan GX, Antzelevitch C, Short QT. syndrome: from bench to bedside. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Aug 1;3(4):401–408. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. van der Werf C, van Langen IM, Wilde AA. Sudden death in the young: what do we know about it and how to prevent? Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb 1;3(1):96–104. [PubMed]
51. Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with apparently normal heart. Need for definition and standardized clinical evaluation. Consensus Statement of the Joint Steering Committees of the Unexplained Cardiac Arrest Registry of Europe and of the Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Registry of the United States. Circulation. 1997 Jan 7;95(1):265–272. [PubMed]
52. van der Werf C, Hofman N, Tan HL, van Dessel PF, Alders M, van der Wal AC, et al. Diagnostic yield in sudden unexplained death and aborted cardiac arrest in the young: the experience of a tertiary referral center in The Netherlands. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Oct;7(10):1383–1389. [PubMed]
53. Alders M, Koopmann TT, Christiaans I, Postema PG, Beekman L, Tanck MW, et al. Haplotype-sharing analysis implicates chromosome 7q36 harboring DPP6 in familial idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Apr;84(4):468–476. [PubMed]. An exciting report identifying a novel gene and potentially novel mechanism for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.
54. Radicke S, Cotella D, Graf EM, Ravens U, Wettwer E. Expression and function of dipeptidyl-aminopeptidase-like protein 6 as a putative beta-subunit of human cardiac transient outward current encoded by Kv4.3. J Physiol. 2005 Jun 15;565(Pt 3):751–756. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Haissaguerre M, Derval N, Sacher F, Jesel L, Deisenhofer I, de Roy L, et al. Sudden cardiac arrest associated with early repolarization. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 8;358(19):2016–2023. [PubMed]. Landmark study implicating early repolarization on the ECG as risk factor for SCD from idiopathic VF.
56. Nam GB, Kim YH, Antzelevitch C. Augmentation of J waves and electrical storms in patients with early repolarization. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 8;358(19):2078–2079. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Rosso R, Kogan E, Belhassen B, Rozovski U, Scheinman MM, Zeltser D, et al. J-point elevation in survivors of primary ventricular fibrillation and matched control subjects: incidence and clinical significance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Oct 7;52(15):1231–1238. [PubMed]
58. Burashnikov E, Pfeiffer R, Barajas-Martinez H, Delpon E, Hu D, Desai M, et al. Mutations in the cardiac L-type calcium channel associated with inherited J-wave syndromes and sudden cardiac death. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Oct 13; [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Haissaguerre M, Chatel S, Sacher F, Weerasooriya R, Probst V, Loussouarn G, et al. Ventricular fibrillation with prominent early repolarization associated with a rare variant of KCNJ8/KATP channel. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Jan;20(1):93–98. [PubMed]
60. Miyazaki S, Shah AJ, Haissaguerre M. Early repolarization syndrome - a new electrical disorder associated with sudden cardiac death. Circ J. 2010 Oct;74(10):2039–2044. [PubMed]
61. Basso C, Corrado D, Marcus FI, Nava A, Thiene G. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2009 Apr 11;373(9671):1289–1300. [PubMed]
62. McKoy G, Protonotarios N, Crosby A, Tsatsopoulou A, Anastasakis A, Coonar A, et al. Identification of a deletion in plakoglobin in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy with palmoplantar keratoderma and woolly hair (Naxos disease) Lancet. 2000 Jun 17;355(9221):2119–2124. [PubMed]
63. Fressart V, Duthoit G, Donal E, Probst V, Deharo JC, Chevalier P, et al. Desmosomal gene analysis in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: spectrum of mutations and clinical impact in practice. Europace. 2010 Jun;12(6):861–868. [PubMed]
64. Bhuiyan ZA, Jongbloed JD, van der Smagt J, Lombardi PM, Wiesfeld AC, Nelen M, et al. Desmoglein-2 and desmocollin-2 mutations in dutch arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomypathy patients: results from a multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009 Oct;2(5):418–427. [PubMed]
65. Xu T, Yang Z, Vatta M, Rampazzo A, Beffagna G, Pilichou K, et al. Compound and digenic heterozygosity contributes to arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 9;55(6):587–597. [PubMed]. Screening all the known genes for mutations even if an index mutation is discovered is proposed especially with severe phenotype.
66. Christensen AH, Benn M, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Haunso S, Svendsen JH. Missense variants in plakophilin-2 in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients--disease-causing or innocent bystanders? Cardiology. 2010;115(2):148–154. [PubMed]
67. Bauce B, Nava A, Beffagna G, Basso C, Lorenzon A, Smaniotto G, et al. Multiple mutations in desmosomal proteins encoding genes in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jan;7(1):22–29. [PubMed]
68. Rampersaud E, Kinnamon DD, Hamilton K, Khuri S, Hershberger RE, Martin ER. Common susceptibility variants examined for association with dilated cardiomyopathy. Ann Hum Genet. 2010 Mar;74(2):110–116. [PubMed]. Report suggesting that common variants in sarcomeric and structural genes associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy increase susceptibility to dilated cardiombyopathy.
69. Morales A, Painter T, Li R, Siegfried JD, Li D, Norton N, et al. Rare variant mutations in pregnancy-associated or peripartum cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2010 May 25;121(20):2176–2182. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. van Spaendonck-Zwarts KY, van Tintelen JP, van Veldhuisen DJ, van der Werf R, Jongbloed JD, Paulus WJ, et al. Peripartum cardiomyopathy as a part of familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2010 May 25;121(20):2169–2175. [PubMed]. Study suggesting that mutations in genes associated with familial DCM can explain subset of patients with peripartum DCM.
71. Purevjav E, Varela J, Morgado M, Kearney DL, Li H, Taylor MD, et al. Nebulette mutations are associated with dilated cardiomyopathy and endocardial fibroelastosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 26;56(18):1493–1502. [PubMed]. Identification of a novel DCM gene.
72. Ashrafian H, Docherty L, Leo V, Towlson C, Neilan M, Steeples V, et al. A mutation in the mitochondrial fission gene Dnm1l leads to cardiomyopathy. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(6):e1001000. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Stark K, Esslinger UB, Reinhard W, Petrov G, Winkler T, Komajda M, et al. Genetic Association Study Identifies HSPB7 as a Risk Gene for Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(10):e1001167. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Elliott P, O'Mahony C, Syrris P, Evans A, Rivera Sorensen C, Sheppard MN, et al. Prevalence of desmosomal protein gene mutations in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Aug;3(4):314–322. [PubMed]
75. Moslehi J, Minamishima YA, Shi J, Neuberg D, Charytan DM, Padera RF, et al. Loss of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase activity in cardiomyocytes phenocopies ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2010 Sep 7;122(10):1004–1016. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Wang H, Li Z, Wang J, Sun K, Cui Q, Song L, et al. Mutations in NEXN, a Z-Disc Gene, Are Associated with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Oct 20; [PMC free article] [PubMed]. Identification of a novel HCM candidate gene.
77. Hang CT, Yang J, Han P, Cheng HL, Shang C, Ashley E, et al. Chromatin regulation by Brg1 underlies heart muscle development and disease. Nature. 2010 Jul 1;466(7302):62–67. [PubMed]. Landmark study implicating Brg1, a chromatin-remodelling protein, for inducing the pathologic MHC shift from α-MHC to β-MHC in cardiac hypertrophy.
78. Konno T, Chen D, Wang L, Wakimoto H, Teekakirikul P, Nayor M, et al. Heterogeneous myocyte enhancer factor-2 (Mef2) activation in myocytes predicts focal scarring in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 19;107(42):18097–18102. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
79. Ho CY, Lopez B, Coelho-Filho OR, Lakdawala NK, Cirino AL, Jarolim P, et al. Myocardial fibrosis as an early manifestation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):552–563. [PubMed]. Landmark study suggesting that early identification of fibrosis can risk stratify patients at increased risk of SCD from ventricular arrhythmia and heart failure.
80. Teekakirikul P, Eminaga S, Toka O, Alcalai R, Wang L, Wakimoto H, et al. Cardiac fibrosis in mice with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is mediated by non-myocyte proliferation and requires Tgf-beta. J Clin Invest. 2010 Oct 1;120(10):3520–3529. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Baudenbacher F, Schober T, Pinto JR, Sidorov VY, Hilliard F, Solaro RJ, et al. Myofilament Ca2+ sensitization causes susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmia in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008 Dec;118(12):3893–3903. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
82. Captur G, Nihoyannopoulos P. Left ventricular non-compaction: genetic heterogeneity, diagnosis and clinical course. Int J Cardiol. Apr 15;140(2):145–153. [PubMed]
83. Baldi M, Sgalambro A, Nistri S, Girolami F, Baldini K, Fantini S, et al. Clinical and genetic features of left ventricular noncompaction: a continuum in cardiomyopathies. G Ital Cardiol (Rome) 2010 May;11(5):377–385. [PubMed]
84. Madan S, Madan-Khetarpal S, Park SC, Surti U, Bailey AL, McConnell J, et al. Left ventricular non-compaction on MRI in a patient with 22q11.2 distal deletion. Am J Med Genet A. 2010 May;152A(5):1295–1299. [PubMed]
85. Cremer K, Ludecke HJ, Ruhr F, Wieczorek D. Left-ventricular non-compaction (LVNC): a clinical feature more often observed in terminal deletion 1p36 than previously expected. Eur J Med Genet. 2008 Nov–Dec;51(6):685–688. [PubMed]
86. Gajecka M, Saitta SC, Gentles AJ, Campbell L, Ciprero K, Geiger E, et al. Recurrent interstitial 1p36 deletions: Evidence for germline mosaicism and complex rearrangement breakpoints. Am J Med Genet A. 2010 Dec;152A(12):3074–3083. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
87. Hofman N, Tan HL, Alders M, van Langen IM, Wilde AA. Active cascade screening in primary inherited arrhythmia syndromes: does it lead to prophylactic treatment? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 8;55(23):2570–2576. [PubMed]
88. Brion M, Quintela I, Sobrino B, Torres M, Allegue C, Carracedo A. New technologies in the genetic approach to sudden cardiac death in the young. Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Aug 10; [PubMed]
89. Basso C, Carturan E, Pilichou K, Rizzo S, Corrado D, Thiene G. Sudden cardiac death with normal heart Molecular autopsy. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2010 Apr 8; [PubMed]
90. Medeiros-Domingo A, Tan BH, Crotti L, Tester DJ, Eckhardt L, Cuoretti A, et al. Gain-of-function mutation S422L in the KCNJ8-encoded cardiac K(ATP) channel Kir6.1 as a pathogenic substrate for J-wave syndromes. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Oct;7(10):1466–1471. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Shimizu W. Arrhythmias originating from the right ventricular outflow tract: how to distinguish "malignant" from "benign"? Heart Rhythm. 2009 Oct;6(10):1507–1511. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...