• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC Dec 15, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3119859

ΔNp63 Regulates Stem Cell Dynamics in the Mammalian Olfactory Epithelium


The ability of the olfactory epithelium (OE) to regenerate after injury is mediated by at least two populations of presumed stem cells – globose basal cells (GBCs) and horizontal basal cells (HBCs). Of the two, GBCs are molecularly and phenotypically analogous to the olfactory progenitors of the embryonic placode (OPPs). In contrast, HBCs are a reserve stem cell population that appears later in development and requires activation by severe epithelial damage before contributing to epithelial reconstitution. Neither HBC emergence nor the mechanism of activation after injury is understood. Here we show that the transcription factor p63 (Trp63), which is expressed selectively by adult HBCs, is required for HBC differentiation. The first evidence of HBC differentiation is the expression of p63 by cells that closely resemble embryonic OPPs and adult GBCs by morphology and expression of the transcription factors Sox2, Ascl1, and Hes1. HBC formation is delayed in Ascl1 knockout OE and is completely abrogated in p63-null mice. Strikingly, other cell types of the OE form normally in the p63 knockout OE. The role of p63 in HBC differentiation appears to be conserved in the regenerating rat OE, where HBCs disappear and then reappear after tissue lesion. Finally, p63 protein is down-regulated in HBCs activated by lesion to become multipotent progenitor cells. Taken together, our data identify a novel mechanism for the generation of a reserve stem cell population and suggest a p63-dependent molecular switch is responsible for activating reserve stem cells when they are needed.


Adult stem cells are responsible for the maintenance and repair of self-renewing tissues throughout life. In some tissues, several progenitor populations are set aside during development to contribute to tissue maintenance and/or repair (Ito et al., 2007, Leung et al., 2007, Carlen et al., 2009). Stem cells that contribute to repair as opposed to maintenance often appear dormant in adult tissues, but can be activated by injury to generate multiple cell types (Ito et al., 2007, Carlen et al., 2009). Here we examine the dynamics of such a reserve stem cell population in the mammalian olfactory epithelium (OE).

Two broad basal cell populations with characteristics of stem cells have been identified in the adult OE. 1) Globose basal cells (GBCs) are situated just basal to olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) and constitute a functionally heterogeneous population. GBCs in the maturing and adult OE resemble the olfactory placode progenitor cells (OPPs) that give rise to the OE during embryogenesis with respect to transcription factor profile (Cau et al., 2000, Cau et al., 2002, Manglapus et al., 2004, Guo et al., 2010). Accordingly, clonal analysis following retroviral lineage tracing and transplantation after FACS purification show that GBCs encompass lineage-committed progenitors as well as lineage-uncommitted multipotent stem and/or progenitor cells (Goldstein et al., 1998, Huard et al., 1998, Jang et al., 2003, Chen et al., 2004). 2) Horizontal basal cells (HBCs) are arranged as a monolayer of flattened cells directly apposed and tightly adherent to the basal lamina. In contrast to GBCs, HBCs do not appear until late embryogenesis and do not form a complete differentiated monolayer until the second week after birth (Holbrook et al., 1995). However, genetic lineage tracing demonstrates that some HBCs are multipotent cells capable of giving rise to all cellular constituents of the epithelium after injury suggesting that HBCs are a reserve stem cell population and contribute to tissue repair (Leung et al., 2007).

In skin and other stratified epithelia the transcription factor p63 (a member of the p53 family) is highly expressed in the basal cell layer. Homozygous p63 mutant mice fail to form stratified epithelia due to a defect in progenitor cell generation and maintenance (Mills et al., 1999, Yang et al., 1999, Candi et al., 2007, McKeon and Melino, 2007). Among the genes directly regulated by p63 are the prototypic basal cell cytokeratins K5/K14 (Romano et al., 2009), molecules which mediate adhesion to the basal lamina, such as integrins (Carroll et al., 2006), components of signaling pathways including the Notch and Wnt pathways (Laurikkala et al., 2006, Romano et al., 2010, Yalcin-Ozuysal et al., 2010), and chromatin remodeling components (Keyes et al., 2011).

Here, we report that p63 is expressed in differentiating and mature HBCs and is required for their generation during development. We also identify a cycle of down-regulation and re-expression of p63 during recovery of the adult epithelium from injury that substantiates a role for p63 in the cycle of HBC activation and return to dormancy.


Animal Strains

Adult SD (Sprague-Dawley) rats were purchased from Taconic. Wildtype C57/B6 mice from Jackson Labs were used to analyze embryonic expression of p63. C57/B6 mice were mated to 129S1/Sv1MJ (Jackson) to produce the F1 progeny used in MeBr lesion experiments. Generation of ΔMash1-GFP (Ascl1 KO) knock-in mice and B6.129S7-Trp63tm2Brd/J (Brdm2 p63 KO) mice has been previously described (Mills et al., 1999, Wildner et al., 2006). To generate ΔNp63GFP knock-in animals, we engineered a targeting construct containing genomic sequences located 5′ and 3′ to the ΔNp63-specific exon in order to facilitate homologous recombination. The EGFP gene was fused in-frame to the codon that is specific for the ΔN isoform of the p63 gene to preserve as closely as possible the endogenous regulation of ΔNp63 at the transcriptional level. Additionally, a neomycin resistance gene (PGK-neo) flanked by FRT sites and the diphtheria toxin gene was used for selection in 129Sv embryonic stem (ES) cells. Two correctly targeted ES clones were identified by southern blotting and PCR. The selection and expansion of the ES cell clones were performed by the Gene Targeting and Transgenic Core Facility at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI). We used ΔNp63GFP ES cells to generate chimeras that were then bred to C57/BL6 mice to obtain germline transmission. The heterozygous ΔNp63GFP offspring were subsequently crossed to generate homozygous ΔNp63GFP/GFP, ΔNp63GFP, and wild-type mice for analysis. Details about the generation of the ΔNp63GFP knock-in animals and their detailed phenotypic characterization are described in a separate manuscript (Romano et al., in preparation). All protocols governing the use of vertebrate animals were approved by the Committee for the Humane Use of Animals at Tufts University School of Medicine, where the animals were housed and experiments were conducted.

Tissue Processing for Immunohistochemistry

Pregnant dams were euthanized by cervical dislocation. Embryos were harvested and staged based on crown-rump length and Theiler criteria. The embryos were immersion-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) overnight. Neonates (up to P3) were euthanized by rapid decapitation and immersion-fixed in 4% PFA overnight. All rats and mice P10 and older were anaesthetized with an IP injection of triple cocktail of ketamine (37.5 mg/kg), xylazine (7.5 mg/kg), and acepromazine (1.25 mg/kg). Anaesthetized animals were transcardially flushed with PBS and perfused with 4% PFA. After dissection the tissue was post-fixed in 4% PFA under vacuum and decalcified in saturated EDTA overnight. All tissue was cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PBS, embedded in OCT compound (Miles Inc., Elkhart, IN), and frozen in liquid nitrogen. 8 μm coronal sections were generated on a Leica cryostat, mounted on “Plus” slides (Fischer Scientific) and stored at −20°C until needed.


Cells of the olfactory mucosa were dissociated and FACS-sorted for viability on the basis of propidium iodide exclusion (Chen et al., 2004). RNA was isolated from 106 viable cells using the ZymoResearch DNA-free RNA purification kit. To generate cDNA, 50 ng of RNA were reverse transcribed using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). A no-RT control was also performed with 50 ng RNA. cDNA was subjected to PCR using primers and conditions as described (Nakamuta and Kobayashi, 2007).


Primary antibody dilutions and the details of their working conditions and detection are listed in Table 1. Tissue sections were rinsed in PBS to remove OCT, puddled with citrate buffer, and steamed for 10 minutes in a commercial food steamer. Sections were blocked with 10% donkey serum/5% non-fat dry milk/4% BSA/0.1% TritonX-100 in PBS and incubated overnight in primary antibody. The following day the staining was visualized using an array of methods as indicated in the table. Unless otherwise indicated, blue represents the nuclear counterstain DAPI.

Table 1
Antibodies and staining protocols used in this study.

Image processing and quantification

Stained sections were imaged on a Zeiss 510 Confocal microscope in multi-tracking mode or on a Nikon 800E epifluorescent microscope with a Spot RT2 digital camera. Image preparation, assembly and analysis were performed in Photoshop CS2. In the vast majority of photos, only balance, contrast and evenness of the illumination were altered. In cases where tyramide signal amplification was used to visualize bound antibody (Ascl1 and Hes1 staining), a median noise filter of 2 pixels or less was applied to images. This filter reduces nonspecific background speckling smaller than the filter setting and does not alter those features (nuclear and cytoplasmic) specific to the antibody staining. For Fig. 2B low magnification images were taken with the Spot RT2 camera and assembled to encompass the entire tissue. The staining was highlighted using standard Photoshop tools.

Figure 2
p63 expression anticipates HBC differentiation

Cell types were counted by direct observation with the epifluorescent microscope. A low magnification image was used to measure the length of OE counted. Three animals (at least 3 sections/animal) were counted per time point examined, and the data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA using Graphpad Prism software. Mean values and standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) are reported.

EdU administration and processing

80 mg/g EdU (Invitrogen) was administered by subcutaneous injection to animals or pregnant dams. Two hours after injection tissue was processed as above. For visualization of EdU incorporation, sections were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS, and treated with azide-594 containing Click-iT reaction cocktail (Invitrogen) for 30 minutes. After 3 washes in 3% BSA in PBS, sections were steamed and stained for p63 as above.

Electron Microscopy

The heads from P0 p63+/+ and p63−/− pups were immersion-fixed overnight in EM fix (4% PFA + 3% gluteraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3). The olfactory tissue was then sectioned at 1 mm using a vibratome (Leica) and collected in cacodylate buffer. Sections were processed according to previously published protocols (Holbrook et al., 1995, Kubilus and Linsenmayer, 2010) and viewed on a Philips CM-10 transmission-electron microscope at 80 kV.

MeBr lesion

Twelve-week old F1 (C57×129) male mice were exposed to 180 ppm MeBr gas in pure air for 8 hours (Chen et al., 2004). SD Rats at 300 grams body weight were exposed to 330 ppm MeBr gas in pure air for 6 hours (Schwob et al., 1995).


p63 marks phenotypically differentiated HBCs

The OE is a pseudostratified neuroepithelium that consists of olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), sustentacular (Sus) cells, duct/gland assemblies, microvillar cells, and a set of morphologically and functionally heterogeneous basal cells including HBCs and GBCs (Graziadei and Graziadei, 1979). The lamina propria of the olfactory mucosa contains olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) that surround the axon fascicles of the OSNs as well as a heterogeneous population of fibroblasts some of which might function as mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) (Tome et al., 2009, Delorme et al., 2010) (Fig. 1A). In adult mouse and rat OE we find that anti-p63 antibodies label the nuclei of basal cells that are immediately apposed to the basal lamina; the p63(+) cells are flat, have scant cytoplasm, and co-label with the HBC markers K14 and CD54 (I-CAM) (Fig. 1B,D,E and not shown). Rarely, some of the K14(+) HBCs do not contain detectable p63 (Fig. 1C). Such p63(−)/K14(+) cells represent ~4% (8/201) of the total K14(+) cells in the rat and <1% (2/235) in the mouse.

Figure 1
ΔNp63 is expressed by HBCs of the adult OE of rat (B,C) and mouse (D-F)

The p63 gene encodes two sets of N-terminal isoforms driven by alternate promoters and 3 different C-terminal isoforms (α, β, and γ) generated by alternative splicing (Yang et al., 1998, Ghioni et al., 2002, Candi et al., 2007). The prevalent N-terminal isoforms present in the basal cells of most stratified epithelia are the ΔNp63 forms, which lack a transcriptional transactivation domain at the 5′ end of the gene (Candi et al., 2006). The TAp63 isoforms, which contain the transactivation domain, control CNS development (playing a role in neuronal apoptosis) and female germline maintenance (Jacobs et al., 2005, Suh et al., 2006). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR of RNA isolated from murine whole olfactory mucosa indicates that ΔNp63α and -β are the prevalent isoforms of p63 expressed in the OE; under the same conditions no TA- or γ-isoforms were detected. Immunolabeling with a ΔNp63-specific antibody (Romano et al., 2006) is completely coextensive with pan-p63 antibody staining in the HBCs (Fig. 1F), while a TAp63-specific antibody did not generate any nuclear signal in the OE (Romano et al., 2009)

p63 expression anticipates differentiation of HBCs during embryonic development

Given that HBCs do not appear until the perinatal period when all other cell types of the OE have already emerged, we assayed for the expression of p63 in the embryonic and early postnatal epithelium (Fig. 2A, B). At E12, no p63 labeling is observed in OE. At E14, p63(+) cells are concentrated in the apical reaches of the epithelium; none of them contact the basal lamina. At this stage K14- or K5-labeled cells (Fig. 2A and not shown) have yet to appear in the OE. For purposes of classification we designated p63(+)/K14(−) cells as “HBC progenitors” (Fig. 2B). At E16.5 the density of “HBC progenitors” is slightly increased compared to E14. In addition, some p63(+) cells are weakly labeled by anti-K14 and K5 (not shown). The nuclei of the p63(+)/K14(+) cells are elongated and parallel the apico-basal axis. Some of these cells abut the basal lamina, but they are not flattened and lack the high level of K14 expression that is characteristic of mature HBCs. We classified these cells “nascent HBCs” (Fig. 2B). At E17.5 the density of “HBC progenitors” and “nascent HBCs” remains constant relative to E16.5. At E17.5 we observe a few “mature HBCs” (defined as flattened cells with abundant K14, adjacent to the basal lamina). At P0 the density of “HBC progenitors” decreases sharply, while the populations of “nascent HBCs” and “mature HBCs” expand. At P3, the number of “mature HBCs” continues to increase until P10. By P10 the OE approaches the adult state and contains a monolayer of flattened, K14(+) HBCs at the basal lamina with few if any “HBC progenitors” and rare “nascent HBCs”. The time course described above suggests that p63 marks progenitor cells (as indicated in Fig. 2B) that will come to express K14 and acquire mature HBC morphology. The appearance in the middle of the apicobasal axis followed by their accumulation at the basal lamina suggests that the p63(+) cells are in transit toward the epithelial base. As the cells that initiate p63 expression are neither at the apex of the developing epithelium, where the dividing OPPs are found, nor yet at the base, where the GBCs reside, we call them OPP/GBCs for convenience.

A mapping of p63 and K14 expression as they accumulate across the whole OE demonstrates that the aforementioned pattern is representative of HBC development overall (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, the ventral OE displays higher numbers of p63 and K14 expressing cells at earlier time points than the dorsal OE. This is consistent with earlier reports which show that HBC development is delayed in the dorsal vs. ventral OE in rats as well as other accounts of OE embryogenesis (Suzuki and Takeda, 1991, Holbrook et al., 1995).

In sum, the expression of p63 anticipates both molecular (e.g., K5/14 expression) and morphological differentiation of HBCs. The sequence of expression (combined with the role of p63 in maintaining basal cell populations in other epithelia) implicates p63 as a linchpin in the differentiation of this important population of reserve stem cells in the OE.

p63 is expressed along with various molecular markers of GBCs and OPPs

We sought to classify the p63(+) cells of the embryonic OE by comparing p63 expression with other transcription factors characteristic of the progenitor cell types of the OE. We first examined Sox2, a marker common to OPPs and adult basal cells; all of the p63(+) progenitors also label for Sox2 protein (Fig. 3A,D). Other markers that co-label with p63 are characteristic of what are believed to be more committed subsets of progenitor cells. For example, a low percentage of p63(+) cells express Ascl1, a bHLH transcription factor usually thought to convey a commitment to neuronal differentiation (Cau et al., 2002). The p63(+)/Ascl1(+) cells are most prominent at E14, becoming scant at E16.5 (Fig. 3B, E). In contrast, p63(+) cells that co-label with anti-Hes1 antibodies increase during the same time period (Fig. 3C,F). Hes1 is a bHLH transcription factor that is thought to oppose the action of Ascl1 and is characteristic of Sus cells or GBCs differentiating into Sus cells in the normal and regenerating epithelium, respectively. The p63(+)/Hes1(+) cells are a different population from the p63(+)/Ascl1(+) cells – double-labeling with Ascl1 and Hes1 antibodies stain non-overlapping sets of cells at all stages (data not shown). Nascent and mature HBCs continue to express Hes1 during early postnatal development. While many p63(+) cells still stain for Hes1 at P10, the intensity of this staining is reduced by comparison with earlier time points and is completely absent by the time the animal reaches adulthood (Manglapus et al., 2004). The co-expression of incipient p63 and heretofore lineage-restricted transcription factors is unexpected and lays the foundation for potential dynamic interactions within the transcriptional network during lineage commitment.

Figure 3
p63(+) HBC precursors are slow-cycling and express markers of OPPs and GBCs

p63 marks slowly dividing progenitor cells

HBCs in the adult OE are slow cycling cells with ~2 dividing HBCs/mm OE dividing under homeostatic conditions (Leung et al., 2007). We labeled proliferating cells acutely with the thymidine analog EdU at E16, P0, and P10 (Fig. 3H-J). Throughout the perinatal time-course of HBC development, there is no significant difference in the number of p63(+)/EdU(+) cells/mm OE (~2 cells/mm OE) (Fig. 3K). Since there are fewer p63(+) cells early in development we also analyzed the percentage of the total number of p63(+) cells that are EdU(+). The percent of EdU(+)/p63(+) cells trends downward during development, approaching statistical significance (p = 0.06, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis statistic = 5.600) (Fig. 3L). The apparent trend may be due to a higher number of cells with newly-acquired expression of p63. Such cells may have incorporated EdU before they expressed p63. These data suggest that p63(+) HBC progenitor cells become slow cycling before their full differentiation into mature HBCs.

Ascl1 knock-out causes a delay in the OE in p63 expression and HBC differentiation

To test the hypothesis that p63(+) HBC progenitors might pass through a phase of Ascl1 expression we analyzed the embryonic development of Ascl1(−/−) OE using a ΔMash1-GFP knock-in line (Wildner et al., 2006). We have recently observed a lag in HBC differentiation in the OE of Ascl1 knockout (KO) embryos, but no delay in Ascl1 heterozygous (Het) as compared to wildtype (WT) mice (Krolewski, Packard, Jang, and Schwob, manuscript in preparation). Here we show that p63 expression in the KO also lags by comparison with the Ascl1 WT or Het epithelium (Fig. 4). At E14.5, p63(+) cells cannot be detected in the Ascl1 knockout OE in contrast to the sizeable population of p63(+) cells in the Ascl1 Het littermates (Fig. 4A,B). At E18.5, the KO OE still contains very few p63(+) cells, while the Het OE has robust p63 and K14 expression, which parallels the developmental increase seen in the C57/B6 strain described earlier (Fig. 4C,D). At P0, there are only a few p63(+)/K14(+) cells in the KO, as opposed to the large population of fully differentiated and differentiating HBCs in the Het OE (Fig. 4E,F). Thus, while HBCs do eventually form in Ascl1 KO animals, there is a substantial delay in their appearance, suggesting an alternate, Ascl1-independent, pathway to HBC development.

Figure 4
p63 expression and HBC differentiation are delayed in Ascl1 KO OE

p63 is required for timely morphological and molecular differentiation of HBCs

To test whether p63 is an essential factor regulating HBC differentiation we next analyzed p63 KO mice in which the p63 gene was disrupted via retroviral insertion into the coding sequence of the gene (Mills et al., 1999). Because the KO mice die soon after birth due to severely compromised skin development, we analyzed KO, Het, and WT animals as they were born. At this time point, K14 expression in the OE of p63 KO mice is not readily detectable. p63(+) HBCs are evident in the OE of the p63 Het littermates, but are reduced in number to 41% (± 9%) of WT, suggesting that HBC development is delayed due to haploinsufficiency (Fig. 5A-C). The OE of p63 KO mice also lacks detectable levels of another early HBC marker, CD54 (ICAM). The absence of p63 in the KO animals does not prevent expression of K14 and CD54 in other cell types: CD54-labeled cells are evident within the lamina propria and basal lamina-delimited capillary loops that extend into the OE (Fig. 5D-E). K14 is expressed by patches of cells within the tongue epithelium of the knockout mice (not shown). Taken together the data suggest that timely morphological and molecular HBC differentiation is absent in the OE of the p63-null mice.

Figure 5
p63 KO prevents the development of HBCs at P0

To confirm that the lack of marker expression indicates an absence of morphologically distinct HBCs we assessed the basal population of the p63 WT vs. KO OE by transmission electron microscopy. WT OE contains flat cells with scant cytoplasm and foot processes that contact the basal lamina, consistent with past ultra-structural analysis of HBCs (Graziadei and Graziadei, 1979, Holbrook et al., 1995). In keeping with past reports (ibid), these HBCs arch over bundles of axons (Fig. 6A). Cells with these morphological characteristics are not found in the p63 KO. Instead, we see round cells, some of which touch the basal lamina, but do not form foot processes. Furthermore, axon bundles in the OE of p63 KO mice are not covered over by the arching processes of basal cells as they are in the WT (Fig. 6B). Taken together the above data demonstrate that p63 is necessary for differentiation of HBCs from a placodally-derived progenitor population.

Figure 6
Electron microscopy confirms the absence of morphologically distinct HBCs in p63 KO OE

Strikingly, the other cellular constituents of the OE are grossly normal in the p63 KO, including neurons (expressing neuron-specific tubulin and labeled with Tuj1), cells of Bowman’s glands and ducts (expressing Sox9 and K18), and Sus cells (expressing Sox2 and K18) (Fig. 7A-D). The neuronal population in the KO OE can be subdivided into mature, OMP(+), and immature, GAP43(+), groups in roughly the same number and proportion as WT OE, indicating that neurogenesis is not disrupted by p63 knockout (Fig. 7E, F). Moreover OMP(+) olfactory axons fill the glomeruli of the olfactory bulb in the KO mice, suggesting that the bulb is also innervated more or less appropriately in the absence of p63 (data not shown). We did observe a subtle abnormality in the development of Bowman’s glands and ducts. Whereas the glands/ducts project well into the lamina propria of the WT OE at birth (Fig. 7A, C, white arrows), their extension below the basal lamina is stunted in the KO mucosa. In the KO mice, some glands push into the lamina propria, but Sox9(+)/K18(+) cells with gland morphology are often clustered in the OE superficial to the basal lamina (marked by Type IV collagen) (Fig. 7B,D, black arrows). Clusters like this are rarely if ever seen in the WT OE. Since p63 can regulate production of components of the basal lamina in the epidermis, it is possible that the absence of HBCs may cause defects in the olfactory basal lamina that may inhibit proper extension of gland cells into the lamina propria during development (Koster et al., 2007).

Figure 7
With the exception of the HBCs, the cell types and epithelial architecture emerge normally in the p63 KO OE

We also assayed for the presence of progenitor cell populations in the knockout OE using the markers described earlier. Sox2 protein is expressed in the Sus and basal cells of p63 KO OE, however the number of Sox2(+) cells is diminished in the KO compared to WT. Since HBCs are Sox2(+), this decrease can be accounted for by the absence of HBCs in the KO described above (Fig. 7G,H). Similarly, fewer basal cells in the p63 KO OE express Hes1, which is still expressed in developing HBCs at this stage (Fig. 7I,J). Expression of Ascl1 and of NeuroD1, markers of early and late neural precursor cells, respectively, does not significantly differ between knockout and wild-type animals (Fig. 7K,L and data not shown). In addition, we examined the expression of CD190, Thy1, and vimentin to assess the status of the fibroblastic cells of the lamina propria and of brain lipid-binding protein for the olfactory ensheathing cells, respectively. Our examination of the former set of markers was motivated by recent demonstrations that a stem-like cell is present within the mesenchymal elements deep to the OE. However, no difference was observed between the KO and wild-type with regard to the distribution of these cell types, nor the rate of their proliferation (data not shown).

p63 is required specifically for HBC differentiation and not for release of OPP/GBCs from an immature phenotype

There are two likely interpretations of the data thus far: (1) p63 is required to actively drive the differentiation of HBCs from a subset of OPP/GBCs induced to express p63 by unkown mechanism(s). (2) p63 is required to release a subclass of OPP/GBCs from an immature state, and allow them to differentiate. In the first case, OPP/GBCs induced to express p63 in the knock-out would simply adopt an alternate cell fate. In the second case any OPP that might be induced to express p63 would not differentiate and would instead remain immature. To distinguish between these possibilities we analyzed a ΔNp63 knock-in mouse model in which the ΔNp63 specific exon has been replaced by the Green Fluorescent Protein (ΔNp63GFP). Homozygous mice are thus null for the ΔNp63 gene product, but retain expression of TAp63 (Romano et al., manuscript in preparation). In the OE, skin, and limbs, among other tissues, the ΔNp63GFP−/− mice phenocopy the mutant mouse strain presented above, in which both forms are eliminated, once again validating the criticality of the ΔNp63 isoform vs. TAp63 in the OE.

To determine the cell fate of OPP/GBCs that are pushed to express ΔNp63, but cannot do so as a result of gene deletion, we analyzed GFP perdurance in the ΔNp63GFP−/− OE at E18.5. We find that the majority of GFP(+) cells at this age are CK18(+) and have the morphology of either Sus or Bowman’s gland cells (Fig. 8A-A”). The GFP(+) Sus cells are Sox2(+), while the GFP(+) gland cells are Sox2(−), which are their marker profiles in the normal OE (Fig. 8B-B”). Interestingly, none of the GFP(+) cells stained for PGP9.5 or Tuj1, suggesting that these OPP/GBCs are committed to a non-neuronal lineage (Fig. 8C-C”). Some GFP(+) cells did not resemble Sus or gland cells and did not express the neuronal markers PGP9.5 or Tuj1, suggesting that a subset of OPP/GBCs is still driven to express the ΔNp63 locus at this age (Fig. 8A, C, and not shown). Taken together, our data strongly suggest that p63 functions actively to drive HBC differentiation of a progenitor committed to making non-neuronal cells, rather than passively to release OPP/GBCs from an uncommitted, immature state.

Figure 8
OPP/GBCs differentiate into non-neuronal subtypes in the absence of p63

Recovery of ventral rat OE recapitulates the developmental sequence of HBC formation

The rodent OE is lesioned by passive inhalation of the olfactotoxic gas methyl bromide (MeBr) (Schwob et al., 1995). MeBr destroys the differentiated cells (neurons, Sus cells, microvillar cells) of the OE, but spares a heterogeneous population of basal progenitor cells, truncated ducts and damaged Bowman’s glands. The remaining cells are able to reconstitute the epithelium fully in 2-3 weeks. However, the response of HBCs to the toxin is subtly different in rat vs. mouse OE, which provides an analytic advantage. We have previously shown that the ventral domain of the MeBr-lesioned rat OE becomes almost completely devoid of K5/14(+) HBCs by 1-3 days after exposure (Schwob et al., 1995). The HBCs then reappear progressively between 3-14 days post-lesion (dpl). As such, regeneration of the ventral rat OE after lesion recapitulates development.

As expected, the number of p63(+)/K14(+) cells (HBCs) in the ventral OE drops off at 1 and 3 dpl as compared to normal OE (Fig. 9A,B). As regeneration proceeds from 3 to 5 dpl, p63(+)/K14(−) cells (HBC progenitors) appear, although they are less numerous than during embryonic development (Fig. 9C,D). Instead, most nascent p63(+) cells express low levels of K14, suggesting that these cells are much quicker to express HBC cytokeratins than embryonic HBC progenitors. Because it is difficult to discriminate cells that lack K14 expression from those with very low levels of K14-labeling, we grouped p63(+)/K14(−) and p63(+)/K14(weak) cells into a single category for purposes of the quantitative analysis (Fig. 9F). These “HBC precursors” increase in number during the first 1.5 weeks of regeneration until a nearly mature HBC layer is re-established by 2 weeks post-lesion (Fig. 9E,F). These data further validate a role for p63 in maintaining a reserve stem cell population within the cellular dynamics of the OE.

Figure 9
p63 expression anticipates HBC differentiation in the regenerating ventral rat OE

p63 is transiently down-regulated in the regenerating OE

In contrast to the ventral OE of the rat, the mouse OE retains K14(+) basal cells after MeBr lesion. However, we find that at 1 dpl many of these K14(+) cells are more lightly stained for p63 as compared with normal OE (Fig. 10A,B). Because downregulation of p63 levels appears to be a direct consequence of MeBr lesion we categorized the p63(−)/K14(+) cells in our quantification as “activated HBCs”, while the p63(+)/K14(+) cells were classified as “quiescent HBCs” (Fig. 10F). At 2 dpl K14(+) cells no longer form a monolayer but have accumulated to several cell layers thick. At this time, some K14(+) basal cells have regained expression of p63, but many more apically situated K14(+) cells are p63(−) (Fig. 10C). At 3 dpl all of the basal-most cells of the regenerating OE strongly express p63, while the more apical p63(−)/K14(+) layer continues to expands (Fig. 10D). The population of p63(−)/K14(+) cells remains prominent until 5 dpl, when their number begins to drop off. This drop-off continues 7-14 dpl until there are few if any p63(−)/K14(+) cells present in the tissue (Fig. 10E,F).

Figure 10
p63 protein levels are transiently down-regulated after MeBr lesion in the mouse


Our results demonstrate that p63 is a key player in the emergence of HBCs during development. The first definitive HBCs – p63(+)/K14(+) cells apposed to the basal lamina – appear in the mouse OE at E17.5. Their formation accelerates after birth and the HBC layer reaches confluency by P10. These data closely match prior descriptions in the rat (Holbrook et al., 1995). Expression of p63 anticipates the appearance of definitive HBCs in the embryo; p63(+) cells at this stage are slow-cycling, Sox2(+), GBC-like, HBC progenitors some of which are marked by Ascl1 at an early stage and many of which express Hes1 later (Fig. 11A). Moreover, HBCs do not form in the absence of p63. We also show that p63’s role in driving HBC differentiation in the OE appears to be conserved well into adult life. In the regenerating ventral rat OE, p63 expression recapitulates development by anticipating the re-appearance of dormant HBCs. Conversely, we provide evidence suggesting that down-regulation of p63 protein by mature HBCs is a hallmark of their activation to multipotency (Fig. 11B).

Figure 11
Schematic of HBC development and activation after injury

p63 is not necessary for development of a definitive olfactory epithelium

To the best of our knowledge, our results are the first in which p63 is expressed by and required for basal cells of a tissue, but is dispensable for the generation of all other cell types. In contrast, loss of p63 expression elsewhere (specifically the ΔNp63 form, as in the OE) prevents the formation of normal epithelia. For example, in addition to the disruption of the epidermis, the prostatic bud, the thymic anlage, and the breast buds do not form in p63-null mice, nor is there squamous differentiation of the utero-vaginal junction (Mills et al., 1999, Yang et al., 1999, Crum and McKeon, 2010). These developmental abnormalities are commonly attributed to a failure to form and/or maintain the basal cells of these tissues (Candi et al., 2007, McKeon and Melino, 2007, Su et al., 2009). Our results in the OE suggest that p63 is a prerequisite for the differentiation of a typical basal cell phenotype (flat cells directly apposed to the basal lamina with strong K5/14 and CD54 expression), but does not direct the generation of the entire tissue. In settings where cytokeratin-positive basal cells are obligate progenitors from which the tissue forms, loss of p63 aborts tissue development. However, the cytokeratin-positive HBCs of the OE (a pseudostratified epithelium) emerge later in development, after most of the architecture of the mature tissue has been assembled. While our data indicate that HBCs are not necessary for generating the OE de novo we cannot exclude an essential contributory role for HBCs to the maintenance of the epithelium. It remains to be seen how loss of p63 and concurrent absence of HBCs affects the OE later in life. Do HBCs eventually form via an alternate pathway, as they do in the Ascl1 knockout (see below)? Is the OE less stable in the absence of a backup progenitor population? Will the system exhibit functional/behavioral defects? Answers to these questions will require the creation of an OE-specific knockout of the p63 gene.

HBCs develop from GBC-like progenitor cells

We further characterized the p63(+) HBC progenitors using a wide array of markers associated with OPPs and GBCs. In addition to a marker of multipotent GBCs and OPPs (Sox2) we found that HBC progenitor cells also express factors that are usually associated with lineage commitment, Ascl1 (commitment to neuronal lineage) in small number and Hes1 (commitment to Sus cell lineage) in a greater proportion. Moreover, the p63(+) cells may be transitioning from Ascl1 expression to Hes1 expression (which persists in association with p63 and K14 during the first days of life). The substantial delay in p63 expression and HBC differentiation in Ascl1 KO OE might reflect a lineage whereby most HBCs develop from Ascl1(+) precursor cells that transition to express p63 and Hes1. However, HBCs do emerge to some extent in Ascl1 KO OE, indicating that passage through an Ascl1(+) progenitor is not an obligatory step in the differentiation of HBCs. We cannot rule out alternative pathways for HBC differentiation at present. First, p63(+) progenitors may encompass distinct populations expressing Ascl1 vs. Hes1 independently, rather than sequentially. Second, Ascl1(+)/p63(+) progenitors may give rise to cells other than HBCs. Extensive lineage tracing of Ascl1(+), Hes1(+), and p63(+) cells will be essential to clarify the significance of the marker co-localization observed here. However, the data strongly indicate, that HBCs arise from cells that closely resemble adult GBCs, consistent with past results (Schwob et al., 1995, Chen et al., 2004). Combined with our observations in the lesioned-recovering rat OE, these data suggest a substantial flux amongst the basal stem/progenitor cell compartments.

p63 regulates the cycling of progenitor cells from establishment to activation and the return to dormancy

Past work suggests that HBCs function as a reserve progenitor/stem cell population capable of replenishing all the cell types of the epithelium throughout post-natal life (Holbrook et al., 1995, Carter et al., 2004, Leung et al., 2007, Iwai et al., 2008). However, their multipotency remains largely dormant, i.e. they are incapable of engraftment following transplantation and give rise only to themselves, for the most part, unless activated by severe epithelial injury (Chen et al., 2004, Leung et al., 2007). Here we show that the sequential down- and then up-regulation of p63 expression is tightly linked to the cycle of HBC activation and return to dormancy. Our findings in the MeBr lesioned-recovering OE parallel observations in skin demonstrating that the transition from basal to suprabasal compartments is mediated by down-regulation of p63 via miR-203 expression (Lena et al., 2008, Yi et al., 2008). Likewise, wound healing in humans is accompanied by a transient down-regulation of p63 expression at the leading edge of the wound (Noszczyk and Majewski, 2001).

While the molecular mechanisms of the basal to suprabasal phenotypic shift are not fully understood, even in epidermis, p63 down-regulation appears to be required (Yi et al., 2008). Direct targets of p63 in other epithelial tissues regulate cell adhesion, signal transduction components, and cell cycle regulators. Loss of expression of these molecules would allow basal cells to detach, migrate, and participate vigorously in regeneration and wound healing (Carroll et al., 2006, Yang et al., 2006, Thepot et al., 2010, Yalcin-Ozuysal et al., 2010). While the genes regulated by p63 in developing and adult HBCs are currently unknown, the potential downstream targets identified in other systems may be relevant to HBC dynamics as well. In this study we have looked at a number of genes already known to be direct targets of p63 including K5/14, CD54 (ICAM), and Hes1(Kikuchi et al., 2004, Nguyen et al., 2006, Romano et al., 2009). The initial expression of Hes1 (a gene that is directly repressed by p63 in keratinocytes; Nguyen et al., 2006) followed by its down-regulation during HBC maturation, illustrates that p63 targets can be dynamic even within a single tissue. Interestingly, we have found that another p63 target, Notch1, is expressed in adult HBCs (manuscript in preparation). Thus, identifying novel p63-dependent transcription programs throughout OE development and regeneration is a natural next step. An understanding of the mechanisms of HBC activation and return to quiescence will open a promising avenue for regulating the flow between the various stem/multipotent progenitor populations of the OE.

Concluding Remarks

The OE is unique in the vigor with which epithelial progenitor cells repopulate neurons and non-neuronal cells for both tissue maintenance and regeneration. At least two multipotent progenitor cell populations underlie this ability. As such, the OE is an ideal system for uncovering dynamics of stem cell transitions that may apply elsewhere. We have identified p63 as a key transcription factor that may control the transition between stem cell types: p63 expression anticipates formation of the HBC reserve stem cell population, and p63 down-regulation anticipates the activation of HBCs, seemingly back to GBCs. This pattern of p63 expression combined with our knockout analysis suggests that p63 is playing a linchpin role in stem cell transitions and implicates it as a potential therapeutic target for inducing stem cell activation. The OE of anosmic humans is characterized by swathes of aneuronal OE that apparently lack GBCs but still retain HBCs (Holbrook et al., 2005). Similarly aneuronal OE is observed in a transgenic mouse model where OMP-driven misexpression of the SV40 T-antigen oncogene likely causes accelerated turnover (Largent et al., 1993). In these settings HBCs have not been activated, and apparently cannot contribute to normal repair of the aneuronal tissue. Such activation might be accomplished by down-regulating p63 in the OE of these patients.


We wish to thank all the members of the Schwob lab, especially Richard Krolewski and Po Kwok Tse. We thank Cathy Linsenmeyer for assistance with the electron microscopy studies. This work was supported by grants from the NIH: R01DC002167 to J.E.S. and F30DC011241 to N.S.


  • Candi E, Dinsdale D, Rufini A, Salomoni P, Knight RA, Mueller M, Krammer PH, Melino G. TAp63 and DeltaNp63 in cancer and epidermal development. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:274–285. [PubMed]
  • Candi E, Rufini A, Terrinoni A, Dinsdale D, Ranalli M, Paradisi A, De Laurenzi V, Spagnoli LG, Catani MV, Ramadan S, Knight RA, Melino G. Differential roles of p63 isoforms in epidermal development: selective genetic complementation in p63 null mice. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:1037–1047. [PubMed]
  • Carlen M, Meletis K, Goritz C, Darsalia V, Evergren E, Tanigaki K, Amendola M, Barnabe-Heider F, Yeung MS, Naldini L, Honjo T, Kokaia Z, Shupliakov O, Cassidy RM, Lindvall O, Frisen J. Forebrain ependymal cells are Notch-dependent and generate neuroblasts and astrocytes after stroke. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:259–267. [PubMed]
  • Carroll DK, Carroll JS, Leong CO, Cheng F, Brown M, Mills AA, Brugge JS, Ellisen LW. p63 regulates an adhesion programme and cell survival in epithelial cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:551–561. [PubMed]
  • Carter LA, MacDonald JL, Roskams AJ. Olfactory horizontal basal cells demonstrate a conserved multipotent progenitor phenotype. J Neurosci. 2004;24:5670–5683. [PubMed]
  • Cau E, Casarosa S, Guillemot F. Mash1 and Ngn1 control distinct steps of determination and differentiation in the olfactory sensory neuron lineage. Development. 2002;129:1871–1880. [PubMed]
  • Cau E, Gradwohl G, Casarosa S, Kageyama R, Guillemot F. Hes genes regulate sequential stages of neurogenesis in the olfactory epithelium. Development. 2000;127:2323–2332. [PubMed]
  • Chen X, Fang H, Schwob JE. Multipotency of purified, transplanted globose basal cells in olfactory epithelium. J Comp Neurol. 2004;469:457–474. [PubMed]
  • Crum CP, McKeon FD. p63 in epithelial survival, germ cell surveillance, and neoplasia. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:349–371. [PubMed]
  • Delorme B, Nivet E, Gaillard J, Haupl T, Ringe J, Deveze A, Magnan J, Sohier J, Khrestchatisky M, Roman FS, Charbord P, Sensebe L, Layrolle P, Feron F. The human nose harbors a niche of olfactory ectomesenchymal stem cells displaying neurogenic and osteogenic properties. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19:853–866. [PubMed]
  • Ghioni P, Bolognese F, Duijf PH, Van Bokhoven H, Mantovani R, Guerrini L. Complex transcriptional effects of p63 isoforms: identification of novel activation and repression domains. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:8659–8668. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Goldstein BJ, Fang H, Youngentob SL, Schwob JE. Transplantation of multipotent progenitors from the adult olfactory epithelium. Neuroreport. 1998;9:1611–1617. [PubMed]
  • Graziadei PP, Graziadei GA. Neurogenesis and neuron regeneration in the olfactory system of mammals. I. Morphological aspects of differentiation and structural organization of the olfactory sensory neurons. J Neurocytol. 1979;8:1–18. [PubMed]
  • Guo Z, Packard A, Krolewski RC, Harris MT, Manglapus GL, Schwob JE. Expression of Pax6 and Sox2 in adult olfactory epithelium. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2010;9999 NA. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Holbrook EH, Leopold DA, Schwob JE. Abnormalities of axon growth in human olfactory mucosa. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:2144–2154. [PubMed]
  • Holbrook EH, Szumowski KE, Schwob JE. An immunochemical, ultrastructural, and developmental characterization of the horizontal basal cells of rat olfactory epithelium. J Comp Neurol. 1995;363:129–146. [PubMed]
  • Huard JM, Youngentob SL, Goldstein BJ, Luskin MB, Schwob JE. Adult olfactory epithelium contains multipotent progenitors that give rise to neurons and non-neural cells. J Comp Neurol. 1998;400:469–486. [PubMed]
  • Ito M, Yang Z, Andl T, Cui C, Kim N, Millar SE, Cotsarelis G. Wnt-dependent de novo hair follicle regeneration in adult mouse skin after wounding. Nature. 2007;447:316–320. [PubMed]
  • Ito T, Udaka N, Yazawa T, Okudela K, Hayashi H, Sudo T, Guillemot F, Kageyama R, Kitamura H. Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors regulate the neuroendocrine differentiation of fetal mouse pulmonary epithelium. Development. 2000;127:3913–3921. [PubMed]
  • Iwai N, Zhou Z, Roop DR, Behringer RR. Horizontal basal cells are multipotent progenitors in normal and injured adult olfactory epithelium. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1298–306. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jacobs WB, Govoni G, Ho D, Atwal JK, Barnabe-Heider F, Keyes WM, Mills AA, Miller FD, Kaplan DR. p63 is an essential proapoptotic protein during neural development. Neuron. 2005;48:743–756. [PubMed]
  • Jang W, Youngentob SL, Schwob JE. Globose basal cells are required for reconstitution of olfactory epithelium after methyl bromide lesion. J Comp Neurol. 2003;460:123–140. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Keyes WM, Pecoraro M, Aranda V, Vernersson-Lindahl E, Li W, Vogel H, Guo X, Garcia EL, Michurina TV, Enikolopov G, Muthuswamy SK, Mills AA. DeltaNp63alpha is an oncogene that targets chromatin remodeler Lsh to drive skin stem cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8:164–176. [PubMed]
  • Kikuchi T, Ichimiya S, Kojima T, Crisa L, Koshiba S, Tonooka A, Kondo N, Van Der Saag PT, Yokoyama S, Sato N. Expression profiles and functional implications of p53-like transcription factors in thymic epithelial cell subtypes. Int Immunol. 2004;16:831–841. [PubMed]
  • Koster MI, Dai D, Marinari B, Sano Y, Costanzo A, Karin M, Roop DR. p63 induces key target genes required for epidermal morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:3255–3260. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kubilus JK, Linsenmayer TF. Developmental corneal innervation: interactions between nerves and specialized apical corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:782–789. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Largent BL, Sosnowski RG, Reed RR. Directed expression of an oncogene to the olfactory neuronal lineage in transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 1993;13:300–312. [PubMed]
  • Laurikkala J, Mikkola ML, James M, Tummers M, Mills AA, Thesleff I. p63 regulates multiple signalling pathways required for ectodermal organogenesis and differentiation. Development. 2006;133:1553–1563. [PubMed]
  • Lena AM, Shalom-Feuerstein R, Rivetti di Val Cervo P, Aberdam D, Knight RA, Melino G, Candi E. miR-203 represses ‘stemness’ by repressing DeltaNp63. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1187–1195. [PubMed]
  • Leung CT, Coulombe PA, Reed RR. Contribution of olfactory neural stem cells to tissue maintenance and regeneration. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:720–726. [PubMed]
  • Manglapus GL, Youngentob SL, Schwob JE. Expression patterns of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors define subsets of olfactory progenitor cells. J Comp Neurol. 2004;479:216–233. [PubMed]
  • McKeon F, Melino G. Fog of war: the emerging p53 family. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:229–232. [PubMed]
  • Mills AA, Zheng B, Wang XJ, Vogel H, Roop DR, Bradley A. p63 is a p53 homologue required for limb and epidermal morphogenesis. Nature. 1999;398:708–713. [PubMed]
  • Nakamuta N, Kobayashi S. Expression of p63 in the mouse ovary. J Reprod Dev. 2007;53:691–697. [PubMed]
  • Nguyen BC, Lefort K, Mandinova A, Antonini D, Devgan V, Della Gatta G, Koster MI, Zhang Z, Wang J, Tommasi di Vignano A, Kitajewski J, Chiorino G, Roop DR, Missero C, Dotto GP. Cross-regulation between Notch and p63 in keratinocyte commitment to differentiation. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1028–1042. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Noszczyk BH, Majewski ST. p63 expression during normal cutaneous wound healing in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1242–1247. discussion 1248-1250. [PubMed]
  • Romano RA, Birkaya B, Sinha S. Defining the regulatory elements in the proximal promoter of DeltaNp63 in keratinocytes: Potential roles for Sp1/Sp3, NF-Y, and p63. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:1469–1479. [PubMed]
  • Romano RA, Ortt K, Birkaya B, Smalley K, Sinha S. An active role of the DeltaN isoform of p63 in regulating basal keratin genes K5 and K14 and directing epidermal cell fate. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5623. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Romano RA, Smalley K, Liu S, Sinha S. Abnormal hair follicle development and altered cell fate of follicular keratinocytes in transgenic mice expressing DeltaNp63alpha. Development. 2010;137:1431–1439. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schwob JE, Youngentob SL, Mezza RC. Reconstitution of the rat olfactory epithelium after methyl bromide-induced lesion. J Comp Neurol. 1995;359:15–37. [PubMed]
  • Su X, Paris M, Gi YJ, Tsai KY, Cho MS, Lin YL, Biernaskie JA, Sinha S, Prives C, Pevny LH, Miller FD, Flores ER. TAp63 prevents premature aging by promoting adult stem cell maintenance. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5:64–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Suh EK, Yang A, Kettenbach A, Bamberger C, Michaelis AH, Zhu Z, Elvin JA, Bronson RT, Crum CP, McKeon F. p63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest. Nature. 2006;444:624–628. [PubMed]
  • Suzuki Y, Takeda M. Keratins in the developing olfactory epithelia. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1991;59:171–178. [PubMed]
  • Thepot A, Hautefeuille A, Cros MP, Abedi-Ardekani B, Petre A, Damour O, Krutovskikh V, Hainaut P. Intraepithelial p63-dependent expression of distinct components of cell adhesion complexes in normal esophageal mucosa and squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2010 [PubMed]
  • Tome M, Lindsay SL, Riddell JS, Barnett SC. Identification of nonepithelial multipotent cells in the embryonic olfactory mucosa. Stem Cells. 2009;27:2196–2208. [PubMed]
  • Wildner H, Muller T, Cho SH, Brohl D, Cepko CL, Guillemot F, Birchmeier C. dILA neurons in the dorsal spinal cord are the product of terminal and non-terminal asymmetric progenitor cell divisions, and require Mash1 for their development. Development. 2006;133:2105–2113. [PubMed]
  • Yalcin-Ozuysal O, Fiche M, Guitierrez M, Wagner KU, Raffoul W, Brisken C. Antagonistic roles of Notch and p63 in controlling mammary epithelial cell fates. Cell Death Differ. 2010 [PubMed]
  • Yang A, Kaghad M, Wang Y, Gillett E, Fleming MD, Dotsch V, Andrews NC, Caput D, McKeon F. p63, a p53 homolog at 3q27-29, encodes multiple products with transactivating, death-inducing, and dominant-negative activities. Mol Cell. 1998;2:305–316. [PubMed]
  • Yang A, Schweitzer R, Sun D, Kaghad M, Walker N, Bronson RT, Tabin C, Sharpe A, Caput D, Crum C, McKeon F. p63 is essential for regenerative proliferation in limb, craniofacial and epithelial development. Nature. 1999;398:714–718. [PubMed]
  • Yang A, Zhu Z, Kapranov P, McKeon F, Church GM, Gingeras TR, Struhl K. Relationships between p63 binding, DNA sequence, transcription activity, and biological function in human cells. Mol Cell. 2006;24:593–602. [PubMed]
  • Yi R, Poy MN, Stoffel M, Fuchs E. A skin microRNA promotes differentiation by repressing ‘stemness’ Nature. 2008;452:225–229. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...