• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosgenPLoS GeneticsSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Genet. Jun 2011; 7(6): e1002111.
Published online Jun 16, 2011. doi:  10.1371/journal.pgen.1002111
PMCID: PMC3116910

Trait Variation in Yeast Is Defined by Population History

Leonid Kruglyak, Editor

Abstract

A fundamental goal in biology is to achieve a mechanistic understanding of how and to what extent ecological variation imposes selection for distinct traits and favors the fixation of specific genetic variants. Key to such an understanding is the detailed mapping of the natural genomic and phenomic space and a bridging of the gap that separates these worlds. Here we chart a high-resolution map of natural trait variation in one of the most important genetic model organisms, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and its closest wild relatives and trace the genetic basis and timing of major phenotype changing events in its recent history. We show that natural trait variation in S. cerevisiae exceeds that of its relatives, despite limited genetic variation, and follows the population history rather than the source environment. In particular, the West African population is phenotypically unique, with an extreme abundance of low-performance alleles, notably a premature translational termination signal in GAL3 that cause inability to utilize galactose. Our observations suggest that many S. cerevisiae traits may be the consequence of genetic drift rather than selection, in line with the assumption that natural yeast lineages are remnants of recent population bottlenecks. Disconcertingly, the universal type strain S288C was found to be highly atypical, highlighting the danger of extrapolating gene-trait connections obtained in mosaic, lab-domesticated lineages to the species as a whole. Overall, this study represents a step towards an in-depth understanding of the causal relationship between co-variation in ecology, selection pressure, natural traits, molecular mechanism, and alleles in a key model organism.

Author Summary

An overall aim in modern biology is to achieve an in-depth understanding of an organism's physiology in the context of its ecology and historic selective pressures that have been acting on its genome. The baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a peculiar life history completely dominated by clonal reproduction and self-fertilization, prompting the suggestion that natural yeasts are remnants of repeated population bottlenecks in essentially clonal lineages. Such a life history dominated by mitotic proliferation purports a strong evolutionary influence of genetic drift and predicts trait variation to be high and largely defined by the genetic history of each population. Here we chart a highly resolved map of natural trait variation in S. cerevisiae and its closest non-domesticated relative, Saccharomyces paradoxus, and confirm this prediction. We found that trait variation in budding yeast is indeed high and largely defined by population rather than source environment. In particular, the West African population was found to be phenotypically unique with an extreme abundance of low-performance alleles. Our findings support the idea of population bottlenecks in the recent yeast evolutionary history and a large influence of genetic drift.

Introduction

An overall aim in modern biology is to achieve an in-depth understanding of how selection for certain traits in the context of an organism's ecology favors specific mechanistic changes in the cell machinery and establish distinct genetic variants within populations. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its closest relatives are expected to become the first eukaryotic organisms for which such a coherent understanding of causal relationships is to be achieved. This is primarily thanks to the uniquely detailed molecular knowledge that have been accumulated on this organism's internal cellular machinery, which in turn is due to the ease with which artificial genetic manipulation can be conducted [1]. Through the establishment of vast collections of mutants carrying single and double gene knockouts [2], [3], temperature sensitive alleles [4] and promoter constructs that allow controlled gene expression [5][7], budding yeast has become the flagship of reverse genetics. However, the fact that the bulk of our knowledge on yeast gene-trait relationships derives from studies on artificial gene constructs in a few genetically mosaic and partially lab-domesticated strains is cause for concern. Mosaic lab strains constitute artificial combinations of alleles that never jointly have been exposed to natural selective pressure and thus poorly reflect the natural state of the species. In addition, individual gene knockouts only to a very limited extent reflect the bulk of natural genetic variation which arises in the form of promoter, missense and gene duplication mutations rather than complete gene loss. Awareness of the limitations of artificial variation in lab domesticates has motivated an increasing number of endeavors focusing on the genetic basis for natural trait variation [8][13]. However, the lack of coherent charts of natural trait variation in S. cerevisiae has impeded a deeper understanding of the relation between ecology, selective pressure, traits and molecular mechanisms in this key model organism. In its natural ecological setting, baker's yeast has a peculiar life history dominated by clonal reproduction; it only completes one meiotic cycle for every 1000 mitotic divisions and 99% of these sexual cycles correspond to self-fertilization [14], [15]. In fact, it has been suggested that natural yeasts are remnants of repeated population bottlenecks in essentially clonal lineages [1]. Such a life history dominated by mitotic proliferation implies a strong evolutionary influence of genetic drift and predicts that trait variation is largely defined by the genetic history of each population. To test this prediction, we charted a highly resolved map of natural trait variation in S. cerevisiae and its closest non-domesticated relative Saccharomyces paradoxus, species that are separated by about 2 billion generations [1]. This design allowed the quantification of trait variation in relation to source environment and genetic history and the tracing of the molecular basis for between population variations down to individual alleles. We found that trait variation in budding yeast is largely defined by population rather than source environment, in support of recent population bottlenecks and a large influence of genetic drift.

Results

Co-variation of the rate and efficiency of proliferation in natural yeast isolates

To exhaustively survey natural trait variation in the partially domesticated S. cerevisiae and its closest wild relative S. paradoxus, we compared 39 sequenced S. cerevisiae isolates from a wide variety of geographic locations and sources to an equal number of sequenced S. paradoxus isolates. These strains represented all known populations in S. cerevisiae (Malaysian, West African, North American, European, Sake) and S. paradoxus (American, Far East, European) [16]. To provide an overview of the complete Saccharomyces sensu stricto clade, a smaller number of isolates from Saccharomyces kudriavzevii, Saccharomyces bayanus, Saccharomyces mikatae and the recently identified Saccharomyces arboricolus [17] was also included. Isolates were subjected to high-resolution quantification of mitotic proliferative ability across 200 environments; these were selected to represent components of natural yeast habitats, such as commonly found carbon and nitrogen sources, plant and microbial toxins and metabolites, and shifting availability of vitamins and minerals (Table S1). From high density mitotic growth curves, the fitness components lag of proliferation, rate of proliferation (population doubling time) and efficiency of proliferation (population density change) were extracted, providing 600 distinct measures of organism-environment interactions (Figure 1A, Table S2) [18], [19]. Overall, we found the rate and efficiency of yeast mitotic proliferation to be strongly correlated (r = 0.77) (Figure 1B). For 84% of the environments, the Pearson correlation exceeded 0.5, and for only two milieus, proliferation in absence of either copper or magnesium, was the correlation negative. This refutes assumptions of an evolutionary trade-off between rate and efficiency [20] but is in line with reports on artificial loss-of-function mutants in S. cerevisiae [21]. No evidence of a general adherence to a 1[ratio]1 correlation between rate and the square root of the efficiency was found, which would be expected if the rate was maximized in each environment and solely restricted by biomass yield [22]. Rather, the slope of the correlation was highly environment dependent (Figure S1). Taken together, this suggests that the rate and efficiency of proliferation in yeast have similar underlying genetic structures. In contrast, the time to initiate proliferation showed clear evidence of being physiologically and evolutionary distinct since no correlation (r<0.02) was observed to any of the two other variables (Figure 1B).

Figure 1
Trait variation between Saccharomyces sensu stricto species.

Two phenetic groups in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto clade

From species trait averages, it was evident that the major phenetic divide within Saccharomyces sensu stricto is the clear separation between S. paradoxus, S. cerevisiae and S. mikatae on the one hand and S. kudriavzevii, S. bayanus and S. arboricolus on the other - with the non-sensu stricto S. castellii as an expected outlier (Figure 1C). These two clades differed significantly (clade average; Bonferroni corrected Student's t-test, p<0.1) over 42% of all traits. Remarkably, 99% of these deviating traits corresponded to inferior performance of the S. kudriavzevii, S. bayanus and S. arboricolus group (Figure 1D). Most (62%) of these low performance traits remained significant (clade average; Bonferroni corrected Student's t-test, p<0.1) when normalizing for proliferation in basal conditions, suggesting that they are not the exclusive consequence of a general proliferation defect (Figure S2). Interestingly, although the deficiencies encompassed all types of ecologically relevant features (Figure 1E), they were clearly underrepresented among carbon sources (Fisher's exact test, p = 7E-8). This suggests early optimization of proliferation on a wide range of carbon substrates in the common ancestor of sensu stricto and that this selective pressure has been mostly maintained through the recent evolutionary history. Among the traits with the largest phenotypic variances between sensu stricto species was tolerance to citric acid (a dominant fruit organic acid), growth at high temperatures and growth in synthetic wine must, suggesting that these traits may have corresponded to important habitat differences during species divergence (Figure S3).

Between S. kudriavzevii, S. bayanus and S. arboricolus, overall pair-wise trait similarity was extremely high (Pearson correlation, r = 0.82–0.85) despite that these species diverge genetically as much from each other as from the remaining sensu stricto species [16], [23]. Hence, surprisingly much of the accumulated sequence variation in this clade appears to be neutral for the studied traits. Given that these species are mostly allopatric [24], the most attractive interpretation of their trait similarity is occupation of similar habitats in different geographic locations. S. paradoxus, S. cerevisiae and S. mikatae are genetically more similar; nevertheless, trait divergence between these species was much higher (Pearson correlation, r = 0.55–0.69). In fact, S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus diverged significantly (species average; Bonferroni corrected Student's t-test, p<0.1) for more than 18% of all traits, in contrast to conventional wisdom that marks the two species as phenotypically indistinguishable [25]. The vast majority of environment-dependent deviations between the two species placed S. cerevisiae as a superior performer (Figure 1F), even though no difference in proliferation was observed in basal conditions (Figure S4A). This superior performance included better ability to utilize the sugar maltose and higher tolerance to both temperature and a wide range of plant and microbial toxins (Figure S4B). The two unique examples where S. paradoxus performed better than S. cerevisiae were superior utilization of the sugar mannitol and extreme tolerance to oxalic acid, an organic acid prevalent in oak bark, a typical S. paradoxus habitat (Figure S4C, D). However, it should be noted that medium and test conditions have been tailored to S. cerevisiae and thus the generally inferior performance of S. paradoxus may reflect overall differences in physiology that confer media or test condition dependent defects manifested only under stress.

Trait variation within S. cerevisiae is defined by the population history

S. cerevisiae differed from S. paradoxus not only in its on average better tolerance to environmental stress but also in the degree of intra-species trait variability which exceeded variance in S. paradoxus by more than 60% despite lower genetic diversity (Figure S5A, S5B). The difference was consistent over the tested populations (Figure S5C). However, it is unknown to what extent we have sampled the existing global variation in each species and it cannot be excluded that future sampling of S. paradoxus will increase its trait variability. Utilization of less common carbon substrates (melibiose and maltose), growth in absence of particular vitamins (biotin and pantothenate) and tolerance to high concentrations of certain metabolites (ethanol, methanol and formaldehyde) showed the strongest variations within S. cerevisiae, suggesting niche variations with a large impact on trait divergence (Figure S6). The overall correlation between genetic and phenotypic similarity within S. cerevisiae was substantial (Pearson r = 0.52) and even higher (Pearson r = 0.66) when excluding mosaic isolates for which genetic distances have no straight-forward evolutionary interpretation. Hierarchical clustering of all yeast isolates based on the complete array of traits also provided groups that essentially followed species and population boundaries, with mosaic traits resembling those of the parent population donating the major part of the genome (Figure 2, Figure S7AS7C). In fact, 45% of all traits were distinct for one individual population (FDR = 2%). In contrast, only 1.2% of traits were distinct (FDR = 2%) for an individual source, i.e. neither clinical isolates nor industrial strains from processes such as baking or fermentation showed trait coherence within groups (Figure 2). Principal component analysis confirmed the stronger influence of population than source on S. cerevisiae traits (Figure S8). Notably, commonly used S. cerevisiae lab strains were extremely diverse, reflecting that lab domestication either has proceeded along very different routes or has had little overall influence (Figure S9). The few source-linked phenotypes figured among wild S. cerevisiae isolates, which showed low respiratory capability (glycerol, ethanol and arabinose utilization) and low tolerance to copper, suggesting that vigorous respiration and copper resistance may have been principal domestication traits (Figure S10). Disconcertingly, the yeast universal type strain, S288C, constituted the most atypical S. cerevisiae strain in the screen (Figure 3), diverging strongly from the average S. cerevisiae strain by e.g. showing superior proliferative rate on rich medium, superb maltose utilization but lower than average ability to tolerate very high ethanol concentrations (Figure S11). Given the wide-spread use of S288C as a norm for S. cerevisiae, this phenotypic uniqueness is a concern.

Figure 2
Trait variations within Saccharomyces sensu stricto species.
Figure 3
The S. cerevisiae type strain S288C is a phenotypic extreme.

The West African S. cerevisiae population is phenotypically unique

From an evolutionary perspective, the most interesting feature of an organism-wide phenotype map is the variation between phylogenetically distinct groups of individuals, i.e. in S. cerevisiae the Malaysian, West African, Sake, European and North American populations. Mapping our phenotypic information on the recently established population genomics tree [16], we can reconstruct the phenotypic history of S. cerevisiae. The most dramatic event in the S. cerevisiae trait history relates to the West African population, which deviated significantly (FDR = 2%) from other S. cerevisiae clean populations over 35% of all traits (Figure 4). Remarkably, all but one of the West African population traits represented severe reproductive deficiencies, including extremely poor utilization of galactose and hypersensitivity to high temperatures (Figure S12). This suggests extensive genome degeneration following relaxation of ancestral selective pressures. Our previous linkage analysis on crosses of a West African isolate to the other clean lineages [26] showed that its many proliferative deficiencies were due to environment-specific large effect QTLs widely dispersed over the genome (Figure S13). A less pronounced phenotypic burst distinguishes the branching-off of the European population (Figure 4). The European population traits encompassed phenotypes that may reflect man-directed selection for industrial production, such as high respiratory capability (ethanol growth), good proliferation in synthetic wine must, tolerance to tartaric acid (highly concentrated in grapes) and tolerance to copper, the latter presumably deriving from early brewery cultivation in copper containers and anti-parasitic spraying of vineyards with copper sulphate [27] (Figure S12). Not surprisingly, industrial yeasts are mostly European isolates or derivates thereof (Table S1). The European strains were also uniquely tolerant to Na+ and Li+, a trait which because of pleiotropy of the causal locus may not reflect adaptation to a saline niche (see below). The other clean populations were phenotypically less distinct (Figure 4). The Malaysian population displayed superb utilization of melibiose and mannitol, storage carbohydrates common in many tropical plants [28] (Figure S12), whereas the North American oak isolates were essentially unable to metabolize maltose and showed supreme tolerance to oxalic acid. The phenotypically more diverse Sake population, where the K11 isolate deviates both genetically and phenotypically from Y9 and Y12 (Figure 2), featured good utilization of glycerol and excellent proliferation in absence of biotin, the latter of which has been recently reported [29].

Figure 4
Reconstructing the phenotypic history of S. cerevisiae.

Trait variation patterns differ between S. paradoxus and S. cerevisiae

As for S. cerevisiae, trait variation in S. paradoxus agreed well with recently reported population boundaries based on genome sequences [16]. However, although unique phenotypes were observed for each of the American, European and Far East populations, no phenotypic event as dramatic as the one distinguishing the West African S. cerevisiae population was detected in S. paradoxus (Figure S14). Moreover, traits that were specific for individual S. paradoxus populations did not agree with traits that were specific for individual S. cerevisiae populations (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.11). For example, whereas differences in the ability to utilize different carbon sources were prevalent between individual isolates in S. cerevisiae, such variations were virtually absent in S. paradoxus (Figures S11, S14). In contrast, S. paradoxus populations varied more between each other in the ability to tolerate the absence of important vitamins and minerals. Overall, the American population, which covers a vast geographical latitude range, was the phenotypically most distinct, featuring superior tolerance to the toxin canavanine and the metabolite selenomethionine, both affecting the protein folding machinery, but reduced tolerance to superoxide anions as generated by the insecticide paraquat. The genetically distinct South American sub-population, previously regarded as a separate species and referred to as S. cariocanus and here represented by the isolates UFRJ50791 and UFRJ50816, was unique also phenotypically, suggesting either adaptation to a different environmental niche or genetic drift due to genetic isolation from other American isolates (Figure 2). The European population primarily diverged in its metal ion tolerance profile, with low tolerance to lithium and cadmium but high tolerance to arsenic in the form of arsenite, which may reflect soil composition. The Far East population had extremely low performance in absence of biotin, suggesting occupation of a biotin rich habitat (Figure S14). Interestingly, neither traits separating the S. paradoxus populations, nor traits separating the S. cerevisiae populations, overlapped more than chance expectation (Fisher's exact test, p>0.12) with traits separating the two species from each other, implying that different selective pressures have driven trait divergence at different time points in the history of these two species.

Genetic basis for population specific traits in S. cerevisiae

The considerable divergence between S. paradoxus populations resulted in that offspring from crosses over population borders suffered drastic reductions in proliferative ability, as exemplified by on average 42% slower rate of proliferation in optimal conditions of F1 recombinants deriving from a cross between the American YPS138 and the European CBS432. This population incompatibility prevented linkage analysis of population specific traits in S. paradoxus. Such limitations do not hamper genetic dissection of S. cerevisiae population traits, with the exception of the Malaysian population which is effectively reproductively isolated [28]. However, the number of SNPs detected in the 36 partially sequenced S. cerevisiae isolates exceeds 230.000 [16], preventing a full scale genome-wide association analysis over all genetic variations. To circumvent this “large number of hypotheses, small number of samples” situation, we first performed a genome-wide association analysis limited to genetic variation suspected of having strong phenotypic consequences: i.e. gene presence variations, non-sense mutations (premature stop codons), and gene Copy Number Variations (CNV) (Tables S3, S4, S5). The scored gene-phenotype associations were cross-referenced to a global linkage map covering crosses between representatives of the clean lineages examined in 24 environments where strong population specific phenotypes were scored [26]. Where associations agreed with QTL regions, candidate genetic variations were retained as high confidence hits.

One of the most distinct West African traits was the extremely poor utilization of galactose, a sugar that is ubiquitous in natural gum and plant mucilage of e.g. cactus, but not present in an accessible form in grapes or other fruits. The poor utilization of galactose in the West African strain associated to a premature stop codon in the transcriptional regulator GAL3, which acts as a positive regulator to control galactose-induced expression of galactose utilization enzymes [30] (Figure 5A, 5B). Linkage analysis of the galactose utilization ability in crosses involving the West African DBVPG6044, as well as poor proliferation of the hemizygote BY4741 (gal3Δ)×DBVPG6044 on galactose, confirmed this association (Figure 5C, 5D). In S. kudriavzevii and in some non sensu stricto yeasts, loss of the complete galactose system has been observed [31], [32]. Multiple mutations throughout the GAL system in West African strains, notably frameshifts in GAL2 and GAL4, suggested a similar loss of selective constraints following emergence of the GAL3 stop codon (Figure 5A). However, unperturbed galactose growth of the hemizygotes (galxΔ)×DBVPG6044 showed that, except for GAL3, all GAL genes, including GAL2 and GAL4, were fully functional in DBVPG6044 (Figure S15A, S15B). Interestingly, the GAL3 stop codon was not found outside the West African population and the West African derived mosaics SK1 and Y55. Rather, the complete inability of some mosaic strains, such as 273614N, to utilize galactose was due to selective loss of GAL1 (Figure 5E), whereas the severe galactose deficiency of S288C agreed with a well-known point mutation in the galactose permease GAL2 [33]. Hence, inactivation of the galactose utilization pathway has occurred as multiple, independent events in the recent S. cerevisiae history.

Figure 5
Recent, parallel inactivation of galactose utilization in multiple S. cerevisiae lineages.

The association analysis also showed that the ability to utilize the related, but rare, sugar melibiose, a disaccharide of galactose and glucose, was unique for the Malaysian lineage, and was completely associated with the presence of a single gene, the melibiase encoding MEL1 (Figure 5F). The poor melibiose utilization in the West African population, which contains a MEL1 with no non-synonymous variations but only performed marginally better than strains missing MEL1, was in this context surprising. The hemizygotes BY4741 (galxΔ)×DBVPG6044 showed normal melibiose proliferation, demonstrating that the melibiose utilization inability is not due to defects in the GAL system which is known to regulate MEL1 expression [34] (Figure S15C). Interestingly, the MEL1 of the West African and Malaysian populations have diverging evolutionary origins, with the West African MEL1 deriving from a recent introgression of the S. paradoxus MEL1 (Figure 5G), potentially explaining the inferior melibiose utilization of the West African population.

The drastically elevated copper tolerance of the European and Sake lineages associated strongly with a copy number variation of the copper binding metallothionein CUP1 with limited contribution from other loci: the more CUP1 genes, the higher the copper tolerance (Figure 6A). This association was confirmed by linkage analysis of crosses between populations with high and low performance on copper (Figure 6B). Tandem amplifications of CUP1 is well known to mediate copper tolerance in adapting yeast populations during artificial selection for this trait [35]. The emergence of the CUP1 CNV in both the European and Sake lineages, but not in other S. cerevisiae populations nor in S. paradoxus, suggested that the CUP1 CNV may be a true case of convergent evolution due to man-directed selection for industrial production. Such a model postulates independent amplification events which most likely would result in variable amplification breakpoints. We compared amplification breakpoints in the Sake strain Y12 and the mostly European S288C and W303, and found the amplified CUP1 segments in these lineages to be clearly distinct, providing strong support for independent events and thus convergent evolution (Figure 6C, Figure S16). S. paradoxus isolates consistently showed low CUP1 copy numbers and also low tolerance to copper.

Figure 6
Parallel amplifications of CUP1 in S. cerevisiae populations reflect convergent evolution for copper tolerance.

The European population's extreme tolerance to Li+ and Na+ associated to a CNV of the ENA Na+ exporter (Figure 7A), supporting our own (Figure 7B) and recently published linkage data [36]. Sequence comparison to S. paradoxus showed that the single ENA gene in the non-European S. cerevisiae lineages, recently found in a mosaic strain and referred to as ENA6 [37], and the three ENA copies in the laboratory strain S288C, have diverging evolutionary origins. The phylogeny strongly supports a recent introgression of one of the two S. paradoxus ENA variants into the S. cerevisiae European lineage (Figure 7C, Figure S17), as suggested [38]. Transfer of ENA6 to a European mosaic in which the three native ENA genes (ENA1,2,5) had been deleted clearly demonstrated the inferior performance of the ENA6 allele. In fact, ENA6 did not confer any tolerance to low concentrations of Na+ or to Li+, and at high Na+ concentrations only alleviated the efficiency, but not the rate, proliferation defect (Figure 7D). However, the selective pressure maintaining the ENA introgression and copy number variation need not necessarily have been for Na+ or Li+ tolerance; both association and linkage analysis [26] connected the ENA CNV with multiple other traits. Poor performance of the ENA1,2,5 triple deletion during exposure to K+, Cu+, alkali stress and the toxic metabolites methylglyoxal and DHA confirmed that the ENA introgressed from S. paradoxus confers a distinctly pleiotropic advantage (Figure 7E). The ENA6 allele had either substantially lower or adverse effects on these traits, supporting the notion that it represents a selectively weaker allele. This degree of pleiotropy of the recently emerged ENA amplification is surprising, given that adaptive mutations in pleiotropic genes are expected to be rare [39].

Figure 7
An introgressed and serially amplified S. paradoxus ENA gene causes pleiotropy in S. cerevisiae.

Hydroxyurea tolerance associated to an inactivating stop codon early in the reading frame of the functionally unknown HUR1 in the West African and Malaysian populations (Figure S18). HUR1 overlaps the ion exporting ATPase PMR1 (coding on opposite strands) and deletion mutants of both HUR1 and PMR1 are highly hydroxyurea sensitive [40]. However, the early stop codon in HUR1 with only a neutral amino acid change, F947P, in the poorly conserved C-terminal region of PMR1 suggests that the genetic variation in HUR1 is indeed the causative allele, providing a rare example of two functional overlapping genes that potentially are maintained by diverging selective pressures.

Discussion

A fundamental shortcoming of modern biology is that our understanding of model organisms, such as baker's yeast, rests heavily on studies of a few lab domesticated isolates with mosaic genomes, i.e. natural trait variation in these species remains a largely unmapped territory. To address this issue, we charted an exhaustive map of the landscape of mitotic proliferation traits in S. cerevisiae and its closest relatives, revealing astounding trait diversity between and within these species. Overall, trait variation in S. cerevisiae exceeded that of its never domesticated cousin S. paradoxus, despite substantially lower genetic variation. This situation is reminiscent of what has been observed for morphological and behavioral traits in Canis lupus, where a large variation due to recent population bottlenecks exists among domesticated dogs relative their wolf cousins with no corresponding increase in overall genetic variability [41]. Periods of small population sizes promote trait variation between populations by allowing deleterious, pleiotropic and large effect alleles, which rarely are adaptive in longer evolutionary perspectives, to reach high frequency by genetic drift [39]. The idea that natural yeast genomes are remnants of repeated bottlenecks in essentially clonal populations has recently been contemplated [1]. In fact, the natural life cycle of budding yeasts with one sexual cycle only every 1000 mitotic divisions and only 1% of these sexual cycles corresponding to non-self-fertilization [14], [15] makes these unicellular eukaryotes especially susceptible to genetic drift. The high trait variation in S. cerevisiae reinforces the idea of S. cerevisiae populations being remnants of recent bottleneck events. Such a bottleneck hypothesis is also supported by trait variation in Saccharomyces sensu stricto largely following phylogenetic boundaries. First, the six species were phenotypically clearly delineated, an observation that is surprising given wide-spread sympatry [13], [24], [42], [43] and the traditional view that at least S. paradoxus and S. cerevisiae are phenotypically indistinguishable [25]. Secondly, trait variation within S. cerevisiae essentially followed the population structure with little apparent influence from source environments. This is in line with a strong impact of genetic drift, such as imposed by recent bottlenecks, but contrasts against earlier reports that describe links between sources and the traits of specific yeast lineages [10], [24], [44][46]. The here reported strong effect of population genetic history on traits suggests that these source-to-trait links may either be rare exceptions or due to a confounding influence from a shared population history.

A predicted consequence of recent population bottlenecks is the prevalence of large effect and deleterious alleles that is otherwise typically weeded out by long-term evolution [39]. Hence, the recent allele frequency based estimate that as much as 12% of coding SNPs and 7% of non-coding SNPs in S. cerevisiae are deleterious provides strong support for recent bottlenecks in this species [38]. We found abundant experimental evidence for the prevalence of conditionally deleterious alleles in S. cerevisiae, most notably in the phenotypically extreme West African population. This lineage showed drastically reduced mitotic performance in 35% of environments, many of which are ubiquitous in a range of biotopes. These low performance traits mapped to a variety of large effect loci, two of which, premature translational termination signals in GAL3 and HUR1, could be traced to loss-of-function mutations in individual genes. The GAL3 linked galactose utilization defect is especially interesting; although recent loss of the ability to utilize galactose has occurred in multiple S. cerevisiae lineages, the genetic basis for this loss diverge between lineages in the form of loss-of-function mutations in either of GAL1, GAL2 or GAL3. This is in line with that even when traits are similar between populations, the underlying genetic structures typically vary between lineages with the vast majority of QTLs being private to one individual population [26], as expected given a bottleneck hypothesis. Here, population specific, large effect alleles were also detected in the other four S. cerevisiae populations. Notably, yeast domestication traits, traditionally associated with wine/beer production, were specific for the European population and mapped to individual large affect loci. Hence, it is conceivable that many domestication traits are consequences of genetic drift in the European population and pre-dates, or coincides with, the emergence of large scale wine and beer production. However, there are cases of apparent man-enforced adaptive evolution, suggesting that genetic drift does not completely define the yeast genotype-phenotype map. Notably, we show that CUP1 amplifications, which underlie natural variation in yeast copper tolerance, have arisen separately in the European and Sake populations. It cannot be excluded that a smaller number of pleiotropic alleles, such as the well known amino acid polymorphism in MKT1 that affects a wide variety of traits [47], contribute disproportionately to the strength and frequency of population specific traits. However, we found the major QTLs that define population specific traits to be essentially distinct for specific environments, suggesting that the overall influence of pleiotropic alleles is minor [26].

Regardless of underlying ecological and population history determinants, the massive trait variation in S. cerevisiae is disconcerting, given the implicit assumption that studies in one or a few laboratory strains of a model organism may provide a general understanding of gene- environment interactions in the species as a whole. Even the set of genes that are essential for viability in S. cerevisiae, the most fundamental of traits, was recently reported to vary by more than 5% between two related isolates [48], underscoring this concern. The problem is exacerbated by the universal S. cerevisiae type strain S288C proving to be a highly atypical representative of the species. Although it was previously known that S288C constitutes an outlier for certain traits, e.g. with regards to its low sporulation capacity [49] and high transposon content [16], the abnormality of this strain in relation to wild and industrial isolates over a wide array of traits was unexpected. The mosaic genome structure of S288C may contribute to its abnormal traits; although predominantly derived from European stock, it also contains genetic material from a plethora of other progenitors [16], [50]. The astounding diversity of yeast traits and the limited representativeness of the universal reference strain calls for care in extrapolating gene-phenotype links derived from a single lab-domesticated and mosaic individual to general statements on the ecology and physiology of the organism. This stresses the need for application of the powerful yeast molecular toolbox to a wider diversity of genetic backgrounds.

Materials and Methods

Strains

Diploid isolates of S. cerevisiae, S. paradoxus, S. arboricolus, S. kudriavzevii, S. bayanus, S. mikatae and S. castellii were collected from diverse sources and geographical locations as described [16] and as detailed in Table S1. Hybrid strains for tests of hemizygote growth were prepared by mating a haploid parental strain to the single deletion strain of interest in the BY4741 background; hybridization was verified by the ability to sporulate. The ENA1,2,5 triple deletion strain BYT5 (ena1Δ2Δ5Δ::loxP, BY4741 derivative) was a kind gift from Hana Sychrová of the Institute of Physiology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. The West African ENA6 was amplified by PCR using primers as described (Table S6) and incorporated into the URA3 locus of BYT5 using standard molecular biology methods.

Phenotyping

Strains were subjected to high throughput phenotyping by micro-cultivation (n = 2) in an array of environments (Table S2) as described [19]. Briefly, strains were inoculated in 350 µl of Synthetic Defined (SD) medium (0.14% yeast nitrogen base, 0.5% ammonium sulfate and 1% succinic acid; 2% glucose; 0.077% Complete Supplement Mixture (CSM, ForMedium), pH set to 5.8 with NaOH or KOH) and incubated for 48 h at 30°C. Experiment-dependent variations in this protocol are described in Text S1. Pre-cultures were diluted 35× to an OD of 0.03–0.15 in 350 µL of SD medium and cultivated (n = 2) at 30.0° for 72 h in a Bioscreen analyzer C (Growth curves Oy, Finland). Optical density was measured every 20 minutes using a wide band (450–580 nm) filter. Flocculation, which is a serious problem in liquid cultivations of wild yeast cells in higher cultivation volumes, was not observed. The mitotic proliferation rate (population doubling time), lag (population adaptation time) and efficiency (total change in population density) were extracted from high density growth curves and log2 transformed. Relative fitness variable for each strain and trait, LSCij, were calculated as:

equation image

wtkj is the fitness variable of the k:th measurement of the wildtype for trait j, xij is the measure of strain i for trait j and r indicates the run. The measure for proliferation efficiency was inverted to maintain directionality between fitness components. Derived log2 relative proliferation variables were used for all statistical analysis, except where otherwise stated. The average coefficient of variation between replicates, considering all variables and environments, equalled 11.6%, (see Dataset S1).

Statistical analysis

Strains W303, YJM789, RM11 and YIIc17_E5, which contained known or suspected auxotrophies with potential confounding effects on traits, were excluded from all statistical comparisons and calculations of trait and species averages. A two-tailed Student's t-test with equal variance assumptions was used for two-group comparisons. Pearson correlation coefficients were used for correlation analysis, Fisher's exact test was used for tests of enrichments and tests of hypergeometric distributions; Bonferroni corrections were applied in multiple hypotheses testing situations. Population and source specific traits were defined using the False Discovery Rate [51]. A threshold of 2% was applied; however, the relation between the number of population and source specific traits was essentially constant in the FDR interval 0.5–5%. Hierarchical clustering, as outlined in [52], was performed using data centred over each trait and a Pearson correlation coefficient similarity metric. Group clustering was achieved using group averages. Some of the S. kudriavzevii, S. bayanus and S. arboricolus isolates were not available at the start of the experimental series; consequently, data for these strains is missing in 30% of environments. Missing measurements were treated as “missing data” throughout the analysis. To ensure that this did not affect conclusions, analyses relating to these species were repeated also only considering environments for which all isolates were tested. No impact on conclusions was observed.

Associating phenotypes to CNVs, stop codons, and novel genes

For all S. cerevisiae isolates, copy number variations, stop codons and novel genes were extracted using previously published genomic sequence information [16]. Gene copy number variations, stop codons and novel genes were extracted and tested for associations to individual traits as detailed in Text S1. Candidate associations were compared to a systematic linkage mapping of crosses between the clean lineages [26] and were retained only if a significant QTL was detected in the corresponding chromosomal region in at least one of the crosses.

Supporting Information

Dataset S1

Mitotic proliferation fitness variables. The mitotic proliferative variables proliferation rate (population doubling time), lag (population adaptation time) and efficiency (total change in population density) were extracted from high density growth curves and log2 transformed. Relative fitness variables for each strain and trait were calculated by normalization to the corresponding measures of the WT, BY4741 or S288C, as indicated in the Materials and Methods. Natural strain isolates were grouped on the basis of species, population (S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus) and source environment (S. cerevisiae), whereas environmental variations were divided into classes based on overall physiological impact.

(XLS)

Figure S1

The correlation between proliferative rate and efficiency is environment dependent. The linear correlation (Pearson correlation coefficients, r) between the proliferative rate and the square root of the proliferative efficiency was plotted for each environment separately. Three sample environments are displayed. Red = clotrimazole (3 µM) exposure, blue = maltose (8%) growth, green = 1,2,4-aminotriazole (300 mM) exposure. No evidence of a general adherence to a 1[ratio]1 correlation was observed, which would be expected if the rate was maximized in each environment and restricted only by biomass yield.

(PDF)

Figure S2

The S. cerevisiae, S. mikatae and S. paradoxus clade shows superior performance to the S. kudriavzevii, S. bayanus and S. arboricolus clade in a wide range of environments. Trait averages within the S. cerevisiae/S. mikatae/S. paradoxus clade and the S. kudriavzevii/S. bayanus/S. arboricolus clade were calculated for each trait separately, and the clade difference was calculated as (S. kudriavzevii/S. bayanus/S. arboricolus) - (S. cerevisiae/S. mikatae/S. paradoxus). Lag, rate and efficiency traits are displayed separately. Dotted lines indicated with “No stress” correspond to differences in basal conditions.

(PDF)

Figure S3

Traits varying between Saccharomyces sensu stricto species. The trait variance between Saccharomyces sensu stricto species was calculated for each trait separately using species trait averages. The top ten environments with highest between-species trait variance for each proliferative measure are displayed.

(PDF)

Figure S4

S. cerevisiae shows superior performance to other Saccharomyces sensu stricto species in a wide range of environments. A) Average proliferative ability in basal conditions in S. paradoxus and S. cerevisiae in relation to the S. cerevisiae reference strain (BY4741, Log2 scale). Error bars correspond to standard errors. No significant (Bonferroni corrected Student's t-test, p>0.25) differences were observed. B) The difference in proliferation between each of S. arboricolus (n = 3), S. bayanus (n = 3), S. kudriavzevii (n = 4), S. mikatae (n = 2) and S. paradoxus (n = 35) and S. cerevisiae (n = 35) was determined separately for each proliferative measure. Significant differences at p<0.1 (Student's t-test, Bonferroni correction) are displayed. Green indicates proliferation inferior to that of S. cerevisiae, red indicates proliferation superior to that of S. cerevisiae. * pre-culture performed using the same nitrogen source as in the experiment (see Text S1) C) Proliferation of the S. paradoxus Far East (N-43), European (CBS432) and American (UFRJ50791) populations as compared to that of S. cerevisiae (BY4741), using mannitol as carbon source. D) Proliferation of the S. paradoxus Far East (N-43), European (N-17) and American (A12) populations as compared to that of S. cerevisiae (BY4741) during oxalic acid (12.5 mg/mL) exposure.

(PDF)

Figure S5

Trait variation in S. cerevisiae exceeds trait variation in S. paradoxus. A) Trait variance within S. cerevisiae and within S. paradoxus was calculated for each trait separately and a mean over all traits was formed. Error bars represent standard errors. B) Genetic variation within S. cerevisiae and within S. paradoxus [16], represented by the total number of SNPs within each species. C) To determine whether the difference in within-species trait variation between S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus is due to population sub-structure effects, trait variance calculations, systematically and repeatedly excluding one individual population at a time, were performed. The difference between species was clear regardless of population excluded.

(PDF)

Figure S6

Traits varying within S. cerevisiae. The trait variance over all S. cerevisiae isolates was calculated for each trait separately. Environments were ranked separately for each proliferative measure according to degree of variance. Top ten environments are displayed.

(PDF)

Figure S7

Clustering of trait profiles of Saccharomyces sensu stricto isolates. Hierarchical clustering of all traits was performed using a centered Pearson correlation metric and average linkage mapping as described in the Materials and Methods. Species are indicated by line color. The heat map reflects the proliferation of each isolate in relation to either BY4741 or S288C. Green = inferior proliferation, red = superior proliferation, black = BY4741/S288C performance, grey = data not available. For S. cerevisiae, source habitats (symbols) and population structure [1] are indicated (symbol color). A) Proliferative rate traits B) Proliferative efficiency traits C) Proliferative lag traits.

(PDF)

Figure S8

Trait variation in S. cerevisiae is defined by population structure rather than source. To stringently evaluate the effect of population and source on trait variation within Saccharomyces cerevisiae, principal component analysis (PCA) followed by ANOVA was performed. Traits with one or more missing values were removed leaving 523 traits, and 21 clean lineage isolates, the latter independently categorized into five population and five source categories. Before PCA, strains were centered and scaled to unit variance. A) Scree plot of phenotypic variance (%) explained by each principal component. The plot shows that the phenotypic variation is high dimensional, with only the first principal component having substantial explanatory power on its own (42%). B) ANOVA was performed on the five first principal components individually, using population and source as regressors. The plot shows the fraction of variance in each principal component that is explained by population and source respectively. Filled bars = significant (p<0.01) effect of population/source, empty bars = non-significant effect of population/source. The principal component analysis shows that the first and overwhelmingly dominant principal component, explaining 42% of the trait variation, was very strongly influenced by population (ANOVA, r = 0.87, p = 1.1E-4) with no effect of source, whereas the following four components, together accounting for 31% of the variation, showed minor and comparable effects of population and source. Hence, the overall effect of population was substantially larger than the overall effect of source.

(PDF)

Figure S9

S. cerevisiae lab strains have diverging trait profiles. The proliferative efficiency of the four commonly used S. cerevisiae lab strains, S288C, W303, SK1 and Y55, in relation to that of the reference strain BY4741, Log2 (isolate/BY4741), in ~200 environments. Environments where a strong difference of the respective lab strain to BY4741 was observed are indicated with names.

(PDF)

Figure S10

Source dependent traits in S. cerevisiae. Traits that differ significantly (FDR = 2%) between isolates from one source classes and isolates from all other source classes.

(PDF)

Figure S11

Traits unique for the universal reference strain S288c. Traits for which S288C deviate significantly (p<0.1, Student's t-test, Bonferroni correction) from all other S. cerevisiae isolates.

(PDF)

Figure S12

Reconstructing the phenotypic history of S. cerevisiae. Population specific traits in S. cerevisiae were mapped onto a recently established population genomics tree based on low coverage genome sequence data [16]. Population specific traits were defined as environments where the performance of isolates in one population deviated significantly from isolates in other populations (FDR = 2%). Percentages indicate frequency of population specific traits in each population. Inset bar diagrams show a subset of population specific traits for each population. Bars represent trait averages with bar color indicating population and error bars representing standard errors. Total number of population specific phenotypes: West African = 190, European = 30, North American = 13, Malaysian = 13 and Sake = 3.

(PDF)

Figure S13

Low performance traits of the West African population map to different QTLs. To map the chromosomal location of the many phenotypes of the West African phenotypic burst, the West African DBVPG6044 was crossed to the North American YPS128, the Sake Y12, and the European DBVPG6765 as described [26]. For each cross, 96 haploid F1 offspring were obtained after meiotic recombination, and co-inheritance of the West African DBVPG6044 proliferation defects and 130 chromosomal markers was investigated using linkage analysis. Figures depict LOD score plots for the co-inheritance of each chromosomal marker and four West African traits: low heat tolerance (the cross DBVPG6044×YPS128), low copper tolerance (the cross DBVPG6044×DBVPG6765), low cobalt tolerance and low paraquat tolerance (both in the cross DBVPG6044×Y12). Chromosome numbers indicate centromere position on each chromosome and tick marks indicate the position of each marker.

(PDF)

Figure S14

Reconstructing the phenotypic history of S. paradoxus. Population specific traits in S. paradoxus were mapped onto the S. paradoxus population genomics tree [16]. Population specific traits were defined as traits where the proliferative performance of one population deviated significantly from other S. paradoxus isolates (FDR = 2%). Percentages indicate the frequency of population specific traits in each population. Inset bar diagrams show a subset of population specific traits. Bars represent trait averages with bar color indicating population and error bars representing standard errors. Total number of population specific phenotypes: American = 36, European = 19, Far East = 8. Bar color indicates population, error bars indicate standard errors of population averages.

(PDF)

Figure S15

The West African galactose utilization defect is due to a defect in GAL3. A) Deletion strains for all components in the galactose utilization pathway were crossed to the galactose defect West African strain DBVPG6044 (WA) to form diploid hemizygotes, BY4741 (galxΔ)×WA. Hemizygotes as well as their haploid parents and the hybrid BY4741×WA were micro-cultivated for 72 h in glucose and galactose medium respectively and the population doubling time was quantified. Only the BY4741 (gal3Δ)×WA hemizygote shows a galactose growth defect. B) Population doubling time of heterozygote deletion strains (BY4743) corresponding to galactose utilization pathway components, in galactose and glucose respectively. All heterozygotes showed unperturbed growth, including the gal3Δ heterozygote, demonstrating that GAL gene hemizygosity per se does not affect galactose growth. C) Deletion strains for all components in the galactose utilization pathway were crossed to the galactose defect West African strain DBVPG6044 (WA) to form diploid hemizygotes, BY4741 (galxΔ)×WA. Hemizygotes as well as their haploid parents and the hybrid BY4741×WA were micro-cultivated for 72 h in glucose and galactose medium respectively and the population doubling time was quantified. The Malaysian strain UWOPS05_217_3 is shown for comparison. The WA melibiose utilization defect is not suppressed by presence of any of the BY GAL genes.

(PDF)

Figure S16

Independent amplifications of the CUP1 locus in the S. cerevisiae Sake and European populations. To test the hypothesis of independent amplifications of CUP1 in the Sake isolate Y12 and the European derived W303, we investigated the breakpoints of the CUP1 amplification in Y12 and W303 by de novo assembly. Y12, W303 and the West African isolate DBVPG6044 was sequenced to 25, 31 and 29-fold coverage respectively with 108 bp reads from a 300 bp insert using the Illumina Genome Analyzer. Reads for each strain were independently assembled using the SGA (string graph assembly) algorithm (Simpson and Durbin, in preparation). SGA is a graph-based assembler which derives the relationship between sequence reads using the FM-index data structure [54]. The graph is traversed to find unambiguous walks which are output as sequence contigs and the topology of the graph indicates the presence and structure of amplified sequence. To identify CUP1 amplification breakpoints, the structure of the assembly graph around the CUP1 locus was analyzed for each strain separately. We mapped the sequence of CUP1 to each assembly to identify matching contigs. A) Dotplot of the CUP1 contig in DBVPG6044 vs. the CUP1 region in S. paradoxus. In DBVPG6044, CUP1 is located in a single contig without breaks, strongly indicating that CUP1 is not duplicated in this strain. We compared the sequence of the matched DBVPG6044 contig to the corresponding locus in S. paradoxus, confirming that the layout of the CUP1 locus in DBVPG6044 is identical to that of S. paradoxus and consistent with a single CUP1. B) Assembly graph of CUP1 sequence in W303 contigs. The CUP1 sequence had three partial matches to W303 contigs. The region of the assembly graph containing these contigs was manually inspected and a simple cycle (black arrows) was found, indicating duplication. C) Dotplot of the CUP1 region in W303 as compared to the CUP1 region in the S. cerevisiae reference genome (S288C). To find the breakpoint of the amplification in W303, we constructed a putative assembly of the region where the cycle is traversed a single time. This assembly was aligned to the corresponding region in S288C revealing that this amplification is the same as the CUP1 tandem duplication present in S288C. D) Dotplot of the CUP1 region in W303 (single cycle assembly) as compared to the CUP1-1 and RSC30 ORFs in S288C. The amplified sequence in W303 corresponds to CUP1 and the first 1,069 bp of RSC30. Alignment of the W303 sequence reads in the 150 bp region surrounding the breakpoint in RSC30 revealed six reads supporting the break. No Y12 reads matched this breakpoint, strongly suggesting that it does not exist. E) Assembly graph of CUP1 sequence in Y12 contigs. CUP1 had three partial matches to Y12 contigs. Manual inspection revealed two cycles (blue and black edges respectively), which suggests two independent amplifications of CUP1 in Y12. F) Dotplot of the CUP1 region in Y12 (assembly of the blue cycle) as compared to the CUP1-1 and RSC30 ORFs in S288C. The blue cycle corresponded to an amplification of CUP1 alone; 32 Y12 reads supported this break but no reads from W303. G) Dotplot of the CUP1 region in Y12 (assembly of the black cycle) as compared to the CUP1-1 and RSC30 ORFs in S288C. The black cycle represented an amplification of CUP1 and the first 1,624 bp of RSC30, i.e. 555 bp more than the amplification in W303; 25 reads from Y12 supported this breakpoint but no reads from W303. Although we are unable to reconstruct the exact number and sequence of traversals through the cycles in the graphs using the short read data, the three breakpoints found (one in W303, two in Y12) are unique to the particular strains, clearly demonstrating that the amplifications of CUP1 in Y12 and W303 are independent events.

(PDF)

Figure S17

The history of ENA genes in the S. cerevisiae European population diverge from that of the ENA genes in other S. cerevisiae populations. The ENA1 gene sequence from the S. cerevisiae reference genome contained in the Saccharomyces Genome Database (http://www.yeastgenome.org/) was BLASTed (BlastN) against S. cerevisiae genomes [16]. The top hit in each genome was retained and a multiple alignment using ClustalW was performed. The ENA2 and ENA5 reference strain paralogs and the two S. paradoxus ENA orthologs were included for comparison. The ENA genes of the European population and of mosaics predominantly of European origin show an evolutionary history that diverges from that of the ENA gene (ENA6) in the other populations. An ENA6 ortholog was also found in the North American YPS128 and YPS606; however, sequences were fragmented and a high confidence assembly could not be made.

(PDF)

Figure S18

A stop codon in HUR1 explains low tolerance to hydroxyurea in West African and Malaysian S. cerevisiae populations. A premature AAA→TAA (K→Stop) stop codon in HUR1 shows significant association (Student's t-test p<0.015, Kolmygorov-Smirnov p<0.15) to the proliferative efficiency during exposure to 15 mg/mL hydroxyurea. West African and Malaysian derived genomes (DBVPG6044, UWOPS03.461.4, UWOPS05.217.3, UWOPS05.227.2) contain the variant mutation, 14 other strains contain the reference sequence.

(PDF)

Table S1

Strains used in the study. ID refers to the strain ID number in the Gianni Liti collection. For further details on S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus strains, see Liti et al [16].

(DOC)

Table S2

Environments used in the screen. The classification “carbon utilization” indicates that 2% glucose in these experiments was substituted with the indicated amounts of the indicated carbon source, the classification “nitrogen utilization” indicates that 0.5% ammonium sulfate was substituted with the indicated nitrogen sources at nitrogen limiting concentrations (see Text S1). # = two consecutive pre-cultures were performed, the first with nitrogen limiting amounts of ammonium sulfate (low ammonium sulfate), the second with nitrogen limiting amounts of the indicated nitrogen source. * = pre-cultures were performed in medium identical to the experimental medium.

(DOC)

Table S3

Novel genes whose presence varies between strains. Novel genes whose presence varies between strains, as previously defined [16]. 1 = gene present, 0 = gene not detected.

(DOC)

Table S4

Nonsense mutations in natural yeast isolates. Premature stop codon mutations with a minor allele frequency ≥3 in S. cerevisiae. Stop codons in dubious genes, as well as in genes with a high number of premature stop codons (>2), were not included. In all cases, the reference sequence contains an amino acid encoding codon whereas the variation is a stop codon mutation. Strains carrying a premature stop codon are represented by “0”, whereas strains carrying the reference sequence are represented by “1”. Empty cells correspond to missing data for the associated strain.

(DOC)

Table S5

Copy Number Variations in natural yeast isolates. CNVs in S. cerevisiae with product P-value of less than e-50 (see Text S1). For each gene in each strain, the ‘copy number ratio’ was computed as log[1+observed reads]−log[1+expected reads]. Dubious genes and transposable elements, which represented the most highly variable genes, were excluded.

(DOC)

Table S6

Primers used in strain construction. Primers used for inserting the SK1 ENA6 into the URA3 locus of strain BYT5 – a BY4741 carrying a ENA1,2,5 triple deletion. 5′ overhangs correspond to URA3 flanking regions. Gene specific sequences for URA3 or ENA6 at the 3′ end of the primers according to the table. See Text S1 for further details.

(DOC)

Text S1

Supplementary Materials and Methods. Detailed experimental procedures and protocols.

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Hana Sychrová of the Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, for kindly supplying the ena1-5 triple deletion strain; Leo Parts of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute for help with the linkage analysis; and Per Jonsson and Marcus Krantz at the University of Gothenburg for thoughtful comments along the way.

Footnotes

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

JW was supported by the Carl Trygger Research Foundation and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. SWO was supported by the Norwegian Research Council EVITA program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Dujon B. Yeast evolutionary genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:512–524. [PubMed]
2. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science. 2010;327:425–431. [PubMed]
3. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature. 2002;418:387–391. [PubMed]
4. Li Z, Vizeacoumar FJ, Bahr S, Li J, Warringer J, et al. Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants. Nat Biotechnol 2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Mnaimneh S, Davierwala AP, Haynes J, Moffat J, Peng WT, et al. Exploration of essential gene functions via titratable promoter alleles. Cell. 2004;118:31–44. [PubMed]
6. Schuldiner M, Collins SR, Thompson NJ, Denic V, Bhamidipati A, et al. Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell. 2005;123:507–519. [PubMed]
7. Sopko R, Huang D, Preston N, Chua G, Papp B, et al. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol Cell. 2006;21:319–330. [PubMed]
8. Brem RB, Kruglyak L. The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:1572–1577. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Brem RB, Storey JD, Whittle J, Kruglyak L. Genetic interactions between polymorphisms that affect gene expression in yeast. Nature. 2005;436:701–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Gerke JP, Chen CT, Cohen BA. Natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae display complex genetic variation in sporulation efficiency. Genetics. 2006;174:985–997. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Liti G, Haricharan S, Cubillos FA, Tierney AL, Sharp S, et al. Segregating YKU80 and TLC1 alleles underlying natural variation in telomere properties in wild yeast. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000659. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Perlstein EO, Ruderfer DM, Roberts DC, Schreiber SL, Kruglyak L. Genetic basis of individual differences in the response to small-molecule drugs in yeast. Nat Genet. 2007;39:496–502. [PubMed]
13. Steinmetz LM, Sinha H, Richards DR, Spiegelman JI, Oefner PJ, et al. Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature. 2002;416:326–330. [PubMed]
14. Ruderfer DM, Pratt SC, Seidel HS, Kruglyak L. Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1077–1081. [PubMed]
15. Tsai IJ, Bensasson D, Burt A, Koufopanou V. Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: Quantifying the life cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:4957–4962. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, Warringer J, Parts L, et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature. 2009;458:337–341. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Wang S, Bai F. Saccharomyces arboricolus sp. nov., a yeast species from tree bark. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:510–514. [PubMed]
18. Warringer J, Anevski D, Liu B, Blomberg A. Chemogenetic fingerprinting by analysis of cellular growth dynamics. BMC Chem Biol. 2008;8:3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Warringer J, Ericson E, Fernandez L, Nerman O, Blomberg A. High-resolution yeast phenomics resolves different physiological features in the saline response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:15724–15729. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Novak M, Pfeiffer T, Lenski RE, Sauer U, Bonhoeffer S. Experimental tests for an evolutionary trade-off between growth rate and yield in E. coli. Am Nat. 2006;168:242–251. [PubMed]
21. Bell G. Experimental genomics of fitness in yeast. Proc Biol Sci. 2010;277:1459–1467. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Wong WW, Tran LM, Liao JC. A hidden square-root boundary between growth rate and biomass yield. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;102:73–80. [PubMed]
23. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander ES. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature. 2003;423:241–254. [PubMed]
24. Replansky T, Koufopanou V, Greig D, Bell G. Saccharomyces sensu stricto as a model system for evolution and ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23:494–501. [PubMed]
25. Barnett JA, Payne RW, Yarrow D. Yeasts: Characteristics and identification. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
26. Cubillos FA, Billi E, Zorgo E, Parts L, Fargier P, et al. Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:1401–1413. [PubMed]
27. Fay JC, McCullough HL, Sniegowski PD, Eisen MB. Population genetic variation in gene expression is associated with phenotypic variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R26. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Naumov GI, Serpova EV, Naumova ES. [A genetically isolated population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Malaysia]. Mikrobiologiia. 2006;75:245–249. [PubMed]
29. Wu H, Ito K, Shimoi H. Identification and characterization of a novel biotin biosynthesis gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:6845–6855. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Lohr D, Venkov P, Zlatanova J. Transcriptional regulation in the yeast GAL gene family: a complex genetic network. Faseb J. 1995;9:777–787. [PubMed]
31. Hittinger CT, Goncalves P, Sampaio JP, Dover J, Johnston M, et al. Remarkably ancient balanced polymorphisms in a multi-locus gene network. Nature 2010 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Hittinger CT, Rokas A, Carroll SB. Parallel inactivation of multiple GAL pathway genes and ecological diversification in yeasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101:14144–14149. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Winston F, Dollard C, Ricupero-Hovasse SL. Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C. Yeast. 1995;11:53–55. [PubMed]
34. Johnston M, Davis RW. Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1–GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984;4:1440–1448. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Fogel S, Welch JW. Tandem gene amplification mediates copper resistance in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79:5342–5346. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Kim HS, Fay JC. Genetic variation in the cysteine biosynthesis pathway causes sensitivity to pharmacological compounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:19387–19391. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Daran-Lapujade P, Daran JM, Luttik MA, Almering MJ, Pronk JT, et al. An atypical PMR2 locus is responsible for hypersensitivity to sodium and lithium cations in the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009;9:789–792. [PubMed]
38. Doniger SW, Kim HS, Swain D, Corcuera D, Williams M, et al. A catalog of neutral and deleterious polymorphism in yeast. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000183. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Stern DL, Orgogozo V. Is genetic evolution predictable? Science. 2009;323:746–751. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Zewail A, Xie MW, Xing Y, Lin L, Zhang PF, et al. Novel functions of the phosphatidylinositol metabolic pathway discovered by a chemical genomics screen with wortmannin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:3345–3350. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Wayne RK, Ostrander EA. Lessons learned from the dog genome. Trends Genet. 2007;23:557–567. [PubMed]
42. Sampaio JP, Goncalves P. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:2144–2152. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Sniegowski PD, Dombrowski PG, Fingerman E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. FEMS Yeast Res. 2002;1:299–306. [PubMed]
44. Kvitek DJ, Will JL, Gasch AP. Variations in stress sensitivity and genomic expression in diverse S. cerevisiae isolates. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000223. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Landry CR, Townsend JP, Hartl DL, Cavalieri D. Ecological and evolutionary genomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Ecol. 2006;15:575–591. [PubMed]
46. Schacherer J, Shapiro JA, Ruderfer DM, Kruglyak L. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2009;458:342–345. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Ehrenreich IM, Torabi N, Jia Y, Kent J, Martis S, et al. Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants. Nature. 2010;464:1039–1042. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Dowell RD, Ryan O, Jansen A, Cheung D, Agarwala S, et al. Genotype to phenotype: a complex problem. Science. 2010;328:469. [PubMed]
49. Deutschbauer AM, Davis RW. Quantitative trait loci mapped to single-nucleotide resolution in yeast. Nat Genet. 2005;37:1333–1340. [PubMed]
50. Mortimer RK, Johnston JR. Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center. Genetics. 1986;113:35–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1995;57:289–300.
52. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:14863–14868. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Naumova ES, Turakainen H, Naumov GI, Korhola M. Superfamily of alpha-galactosidase MEL genes of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto species complex. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;253:111–117. [PubMed]
54. Simpson JT, Durbin R. Efficient construction of an assembly string graph using the FM-index. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:i367–373. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...