• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC Apr 30, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3084904
NIHMSID: NIHMS283941

Conserved Eukaryotic Fusogens can Fuse Viral Envelopes to Cells

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans AFF-1 and EFF-1 (CeFFs) proteins are essential for developmental cell-to-cell fusion and can merge insect cells. To study the structure and function of AFF-1, we constructed Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) displaying AFF-1 on the viral envelope, substituting the native fusogen VSVG. Electron microscopy and tomography revealed that AFF-1 formed distinct supercomplexes resembling pentameric and hexameric flowers on pseudoviruses. Viruses carrying AFF-1 infected mammalian cells only when CeFFs were on the target cell surface. Furthermore, we identified Fusion Family proteins (FFs) within and beyond nematodes and divergent members from the human parasitic nematode Trichinella spiralis and the chordate Branchiostoma floridae could also fuse mammalian cells. Thus FFs comprise an ancient family of cellular fusogens that can promote fusion when expressed on a viral particle.

Membrane fusion is critical for many biological processes such as fertilization, development, intracellular trafficking and viral infection (16). Current models of the molecular mechanisms of membrane fusion rely upon experimental and biophysical analyses performed on viral and intracellular, minimal, fusion-mediating machineries. However, how well these models correspond to the mechanisms of cell-cell fusion is unknown (4, 5). CeFFs were identified as C. elegans fusogens that are expressed at the time and place of cell fusion in vivo (7, 8). Expression of CeFFs is essential for developmental cell fusion via hemifusion and sufficient to fuse cells in vivo and in insect cell cultures (810).

To identify putative FF members in other species we conducted sequence comparisons (4, 11). These comparisons yielded putative members in thirty-five nematodes, two arthropods (Calanus finmarchicus and Lepeophtheirus salmonis), a ctenophore (Pleurobrachia pileus), a chordate (Branchiostoma floridae) and a protist (Naegleria gruberi) (Fig. 1A). FF proteins are putative members of the `mostly beta sheet super family' and share a pattern of cysteines implying that they are conserved at the level of structure (Fig. S1).

Fig. 1
A family of eukaryotic cell-cell fusogens: FF orthologs from two phyla fuse mammalian BHK cells

To determine whether divergent FFs maintained their function as fusogens through evolution we expressed FFs from the human parasitic nematode Trichinella spiralis (Tsp-ff-1) and the chordate B. floridae (Bfl-ff-1) in Baby Hamster Kidney (BHK) cells and compared their fusogenic activity to AFF-1 (Fig. 1B to F). These orthologs share 26% and 22% sequence identity with AFF-1, respectively. We observed by immunofluorescence 28±4% and 37±7% multinucleation in cells transfected with Tsp-ff-1 and Bfl-ff-1, compared to 26±2% and 4±3% multinucleation in controls transfected with aff-1 and empty vector, respectively (Fig. 1F; (11)). In addition, when we expressed the EFF-1 paralog from the nematode Pristionchus pacificus in C. elegans embryos we detected ectopic fusion of cells that normally do not fuse (Fig. S2). Thus FFs represent a conserved family of cellular fusogens.

To explore whether FFs can functionally substitute for viral fusogens, we complemented VSVΔG pseudoviruses with AFF-1 (Fig. 2 and S3). Recombinant VSV named VSVΔG in which the glycoprotein G (VSVG) gene was replaced by a Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) reporter was used initially to infect BHK cells over-expressing VSVG (1116). The resulting VSVΔG-G viruses were capable of only a single round of infection, manifested by production of GFP. We achieved complementation with AFF-1 by VSVΔG-G infection of BHK cells expressing AFF-1 (BHK-AFF-1), which generated pseudotyped particles carrying the nematode fusogen (VSVΔG-AFF-1). We biochemically validated incorporation of AFF-1 into VSVΔG pseudotypes by SDS-PAGE, Coomassie, silver staining, immunoblotting and mass spectrometry (11). We found that the major proteins on VSVΔG-AFF-1 were the viral proteins N, P, L, M and AFF-1. For comparison we also analyzed VSVΔG-G and VSVΔG (Fig. S4 and Table S5). Infection of BHK-AFF-1 cells with VSVΔG-AFF-1 showed a 600-fold increase compared to infection of BHK control cells not expressing AFF-1 (Fig. 2A). Although infection due to residual VSVG complemented VSVΔG (VSVΔG-G) was negligible (Fig. 2), we performed inoculations in the presence of neutralizing anti-G antibody mAb I1 (17) to assure that we only measured AFF-1-mediated infection (Fig. S5). Thus, AFF-1 can replace the viral fusogen VSVG and can mediate virus-cell binding and fusion.

Fig. 2
AFF-1 can complement the infection of a fusion deficient VSVΔG

VSVΔG-AFF-1 could also infect cells expressing EFF-1 (BHK-EFF-1, Fig. 2A) with comparable efficiency, suggesting that different CeFFs can functionally interact to mediate membrane fusion. To test this hypothesis we evaluated cytoplasmic mixing between cells. We co-expressed aff-1 with a red fluorescent protein containing a nuclear export signal (RFPnes; Fig. 3) and mixed them with cells co-expressing eff-1 and a cyan fluorescent protein containing a nuclear localization signal (CFPnls) (18). We co-cultured the two cell populations and observed multinucleated cells expressing both markers (Fig. 3). In contrast, we did not observe cells expressing both markers in co-cultured cells co-transfected with empty vector (Fig. 3A). Thus AFF-1 and EFF-1 can promote heterotypic membrane fusion. To show independently that these results were a consequence of fusion, we recorded time-lapse images of BHK-AFF-1 cells (movies S1 and S2, Fig. S6), supporting the conclusion that AFF-1 expression was enough to fuse cells. Thus AFF-1 and EFF-1 can mediate cell-cell fusion as well as viral-cell fusion by a CeFF-mediated mechanism. However the VSVΔGAFF-1 infection mechanism is fundamentally different from that of native VSV. While the infection of VSV is mediated by VSVG only on the viral membrane, infection mediated by VSVΔG-AFF-1 requires an FF protein on both the viral and the cell membrane.

Fig. 3
BHK-AFF-1 can fuse with BHK-EFF-1 cells

To study the relationship between structure and function of AFF-1 we used transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We compared negatively stained samples of VSVΔG, to VSVG and AFF-1 complemented VSVΔG preparations (11). VSVΔG virions have the typical VSV shape with a smooth membrane, hence termed bald, while both VSVΔG-G (19) and VSVΔG-AFF-1 virions displayed distinct spikes on their envelopes (Fig. 4A to C). In negative stain (pH 5), VSVG forms elongated spikes on VSVΔG-G (19) (Fig. 4B), while VSVΔG-AFF-1 showed shorter spikes (Fig. 4C). The estimated average spike lengths of VSVG and AFF-1 were 145 Å and 109 Å, respectively (Table S2). To confirm that the observed spikes were indeed AFF-1, we performed immunogold labeling using anti-AFF-1 polyclonal antibodies. We observed specific immunoreactivity on the surface of VSVΔGAFF-1 (Figs. 4D and E, S7 and S8). To further characterize the pseudoviruses at higher resolution and in a more native state they were imaged embedded in vitreous ice by cryoTEM (Fig. 4F to H) and cryo electron tomography (cryoET, Fig. 4I to K and movie S3). CryoTEM projection images showed that AFF-1 proteins coat the pseudoviruses. Side views of individual spikes could be observed at central sections of the tomograms (Fig. 4J). Higher order assemblies of AFF-1 in the form of penta- or hexa- meric “flower” shaped supercomplexes could be observed in slices through the tomogram oriented peripheral to the pseudotyped virus particles (Fig. 4I). These assemblies were more visible in slices through the tomograms of co-purified vesicles (Figs. 4L and M, S9 and movies S4 and S5). The order of these arrays may have a critical function in bending and deforming plasma membranes to mediate fusion.

Fig. 4
Electron microscopy of VSVΔG-AFF-1 reveals specific bulky surface spikes (A–C) Negative stained particles of (A) VSVΔG; (B) VSVΔG-G; and (C) VSVΔG-AFF-1. (D–E) Anti-AFF-1 polyclonal antibodies followed by ...

Here we have presented evidence that FF proteins are functionally conserved in evolution and can restore the infectivity of VSVΔG through interactions with FF proteins on the target cell. Thus, FF, viral and intracellular fusogens converge functionally as minimal fusion machines that function on their own to promote fusion.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

We thank I. Nagano, M. Whitt, A. Fire, C. Giraudo and J. Rothman for reagents, F. Glaser, M. Glickman, A. Harel, O. Kleifeld, T. Schwartz, I. Sharon, R. Sommer and members of the White and Podbilewicz labs for discussions; the Smoler Proteomics Center at the Technion and E. Spooner for mass spectrometry, T. Ziv for proteomics analysis, the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center for nematode strains and I. Yanai, and A. de Silva for critically reading the manuscript. Supported by grants from: The FIRST Program of the ISRAEL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (ISF 1542/07 to BP), the HFSP (RG0079/2009-C to KG); a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship to KG and the NIH (AI22470 to JMW).

Footnotes

One Sentence Summary: A Caenorhabditis elegans cell surface fusion protein can promote viral fusion with mammalian cells.

Supporting Online Material www.sciencemag.org

References and Notes

1. Wickner W, Schekman R. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:658. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Martens S, McMahon HT. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:543. [PubMed]
3. White JM, Delos SE, Brecher M, Schornberg K. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;43:189. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Sapir A, Avinoam O, Podbilewicz B, Chernomordik LV. Dev Cell. 2008;14:11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Oren-Suissa M, Podbilewicz B. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17:537. [PubMed]
6. Chen EH, Grote E, Mohler W, Vignery A. FEBS Lett. 2007 [PubMed]
7. Mohler WA, et al. Dev. Cell. 2002;2:355. [PubMed]
8. Sapir A, et al. Dev Cell. 2007;12:683. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Podbilewicz B, et al. Dev Cell. 2006;11:471. [PubMed]
10. Shemer G, et al. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1587. [PubMed]
11. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
12. Zavada J. J Gen Virol. 1972;15:183. [PubMed]
13. Schnell MJ, Buonocore L, Kretzschmar E, Johnson E, Rose JK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:11359. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Takada A, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:14764. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Matsuura Y, et al. Virology. 2001;286:263. [PubMed]
16. Fukushi S, et al. J Gen Virol. 2005;86:2269. [PubMed]
17. Lefrancois L, Lyles DS. Virology. 1982;121:157. [PubMed]
18. Hu C, et al. Science. 2003;300:1745. [PubMed]
19. Libersou S, et al. J Cell Biol. 2010;191:199. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...