Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2011; 6(4): e19455.
Published online 2011 Apr 29. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0019455
PMCID: PMC3084873

Differential Expression of Anthocyanin Biosynthetic Genes in Relation to Anthocyanin Accumulation in the Pericarp of Litchi Chinensis Sonn

Ivan Baxter, Editor


Litchi has diverse fruit color phenotypes, yet no research reflects the biochemical background of this diversity. In this study, we evaluated 12 litchi cultivars for chromatic parameters and pigments, and investigated the effects of abscisic acid, forchlorofenron (CPPU), bagging and debagging treatments on fruit coloration in cv. Feizixiao, an unevenly red cultivar. Six genes encoding chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS) and UDP-glucose: flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT) were isolated from the pericarp of the fully red litchi cv. Nuomici, and their expression was analyzed in different cultivars and under the above mentioned treatments. Pericarp anthocyanin concentration varied from none to 734 mg m−2 among the 12 litchi cultivars, which were divided into three coloration types, i.e. non-red (‘Kuixingqingpitian’, ‘Xingqiumili’, ‘Yamulong’and ‘Yongxing No. 2′), unevenly red (‘Feizixiao’ and ‘Sanyuehong’) and fully red (‘Meiguili’, ‘Baila’, Baitangying’ ’Guiwei’, ‘Nuomici’ and ‘Guinuo’). The fully red type cultivars had different levels of anthocyanin but with the same composition. The expression of the six genes, especially LcF3H, LcDFR, LcANS and LcUFGT, in the pericarp of non-red cultivars was much weaker as compared to those red cultivars. Their expression, LcDFR and LcUFGT in particular, was positively correlated with anthocyanin concentrations in the pericarp. These results suggest the late genes in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway were coordinately expressed during red coloration of litchi fruits. Low expression of these genes resulted in absence or extremely low anthocyanin accumulation in non-red cultivars. Zero-red pericarp from either immature or CPPU treated fruits appeared to be lacking in anthocyanins due to the absence of UFGT expression. Among these six genes, only the expression of UFGT was found significantly correlated with the pericarp anthocyanin concentration (r = 0.84). These results suggest that UFGT played a predominant role in the anthocyanin accumulation in litchi as well as pericarp coloration of a given cultivar.


Pigmentation is an appealing feature of fruits. Among the four pigment groups, i.e. anthocyanins, betalains, chlorophylls and carotenoids, anthocyanins are the most prominent imparting red, blue and black hues to the fruits in which they accumulate [1].

Anthocyanin biosynthesis is probably the most thoroughly studied plant secondary metabolism pathway. The metabolic pathway leading to their production has been well characterised in some model plants [2]. This pathway is usually divided into two sections, the early and the late sections [3]. The early sections leads to the formation of the dihydro-flavonols, comprising phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL), cinnimate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), 4-coumarate: CoA ligase (4CL), chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), and flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H). Genes of these enzymes in the early section are here called the early genes. The late section leads to the formation of the anthocyanin molecule involving actions of dihydroflavonol reductase (DFR), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS) and UDPGlucose: flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltranferase (UFGT). Genes expressing the three enzymes are thus called the late genes in anthocyanin biosynthesis.

Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) is one of the important subtropical fruit crops, which is indigenous to South China. Red color on litchi fruit is the expression of anthocyanins [4], [5], [6]. Anthocyanin-accumulating fruit often display a range of intermediary colors from green to pink, then red or blue and finally purple to black with increasing anthocyanin and decreasing chlorophyll levels [7]. Litchi has diverse varieties with different fruit colors, yet no research reflects the biochemical background of this diversity. The diversity of fruit coloration in litchi genotypes provides interesting experimental materials for litchi anthocyanin studies.

Cloning of the structural genes in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway and the identification of genes encoding transcription factors that regulate the expression of the structural genes have been extensively reported in fruit crops because of market acceptance and health benefits. The expression of the UDP-glucose: flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT) gene was critical for anthocyanin biosynthesis in the grape berry [8]. White grape cultivars appear to be lacking in anthocyanins because of the absence of UFGT [9]. In apple fruits, five anthocyanin biosynthetic genes, CHS, F3H, DFR, ANS and UFGT, are coordinately expressed during red coloration in skin and their levels of expression are positively related to anthocyanin concentration [10]. Recently, studies indicate that expression of biosynthetic genes in anthocyanin accumulation is regulated by MYB transcription factor in the fruit of grapes [11], apples [12], [13], mangosteen [14], Chinese bayberries [15] and red pear [16].

In litchi, however, the information on molecular physiology of anthocyanin biosynthesis is quite limited. More data are available concerning anthocyanin concentration and composition changes during fruit development [4], [5] and coloration improved by bagging or spraying growth regulators [17], [18]. In this study, we cloned six structural genes of anthocyanin biosynthetic enzymes, CHS, CHI, F3H, DFR, ANS and UFGT and studied the expression of these genes in cultivars of three different color types. Effects of abscisic acid (ABA), forchlorofenron (CPPU) and cluster bagging and debagging treatments on anthocyanin accumulation and the expression of the genes in the pericarp were also examined.


Pericarp color

The differences in pericarp color among the cultivars tested, expressed as the Hunter L*, a*, b*, and hue angle (h*) are shown in Table 1. Different cultivars displayed significant differences in color parameters. Basically, Hunter L*, b* showed a gradual decrease, while Hunter a* gradually increased as fruit color changed from green to light green-yellow, to yellow-red and to dark red among the cultivars (as shown in Figure 1). Hue angle (h*) derived from Hunter a* and b* color space, and therefore is a more practical parameter in reflecting fruit color. The h* value of ‘Kuixingqingpitian’, ‘Xingqiumili’, ‘Yamulong’ and ‘Yongxing No. 2′ were always significantly higher than those of ‘Feizixiao’, ‘Sanyuehong’, ‘Meiguili’, ‘Baila’, ‘Baitangying’, ‘Guiwei’, ‘Nuomici’ and ‘Guinuo’. The lower the hue angle, the redder the fruit skin. This result was consistent with the visual fruit color phenotypes.

Figure 1
Appearance of 12 litchi cultivars.
Table 1
Color parameters (L*, a*, b*) and hue angle (h*) of litchis at maturity.

Concentration of anthocyanins, chlorophylls and carotenoids and their correlations with hue angle

Anthocyanins, chlorophylls and carotenoids are almost exclusively found in the pericarp of litchi but not equally distributed within the pericarp. Anthocyanins and chlorophylls present mainly in the outer cell layers of the pericarp [19]. Therefore, concentration of the pigments on per square meter basis will be more applicable than on per gram basis to the comparison among different cultivars.

Total anthocyanin concentration was measured using the pH-differential spectrum method. Fruit color was mainly influenced by the concentration and distribution of anthocyanins in the skin. Anthocyanin concentration in the 12 cultivars ranged from none to 734 mg m−2 (Fig. 2A). ‘Kuixingqingpitian’, ‘Xingqiumili’, ‘Yamulong’ and ‘Yongxing No. 2′ contained extremely low or non-detectable levels of anthocyanins, while the rest cultivars accumulated quite a bit anthocyanins. In our study, anthocyanin levels of the tested cultivars were significantly negatively correlated with their hue angles (r = −0.78) (Fig. 2 B), which is consistent with sweet cherry [20]. Contrarily, the concentrations of chlorophylls in the pericarp of ‘Kuixingqingpitian’, ‘Xingqiumili’, and ‘Yamulong’ were much higher than those in the rest cultivars (Fig. 2 C). And the concentrations of chlorophylls were significantly positively correlated with their hue angles (r = 0.86) (Fig. 2 D). The pericarp of litchi contained carotenoids at levels ranging from 22 mg m−2 in cultivar ‘Sanyuehong’ to 122 mg m−2 in ‘Guiwei’ but displayed no visible patterns among the tested cultivars (Fig. 2 E, F).

Figure 2
Concentrations of anthocyanins (A), chlorophylls (C), and carotenoids (E) and their correlations with hue angle (B, D, F) in the pericarp of twelve litchi cultivars.

According to the color appearance and concentrations and distribution of anthocyanins and chlorophylls, the tested 12 cultivars could be basically divided into three types: (a) the non-red ones that accumulate no or extremely low anthocyanins, including ‘Quixingqingpitian’, ‘Xingqiumili’, ‘Yamulong’ and ‘Yongxing No. 2′; (b) the unevenly red cultivars, ‘Feizixiao’ and ‘Sanyuehong’, which accumulate some anthocyanins while retaining relatively high levels of chlorophylls; (c) the evenly red cultivars that accumulate significant amount of anthocyanins with decreased chlorophylls, including ‘Meiguili’, ‘Baila’, ‘Baitangying’, ‘Guiwei’, ‘Nuomici’ and ‘Guinuo’ which display a serial color progressing from pink to dark red.

Composition and relative content of anthocyanins in the pericarp of red litchi

Previous works using reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) revealed that the major pigment in ‘Brewster’ was cyanidin-3-rutinoside, and the minor pigments indentified were cyanidin-3-glucoside and malvidin-3-acetylglucoside [4], [5]. Zhang et al confirmed that the major anthocyanin in ‘Huaizhi’ was cyanidin-3-rutinoside (>91%) using HPLC equipped with mass spectrometry [6]. However, there is no available information by HPLC on other red litchi cultivars. To examine the composition and relative content of individual anthocyanins in red litchi varieties, anthocyanins were extracted and analyzed by HPLC. A very similar pattern of HPLC elution profiles for all the six red varieties was obtained. An example of a typical elution profile of red cultivar ‘Nuomici’ is shown in Fig. 3 A.

Figure 3
HPLC elution profile and peak area of individual anthocyanins.

All the red cultivars examined contained the same three peaks and displayed similar relative levels (Fig 3 B). Peak 3 was the dominant anthoycanin in litchi pericarp, which was putatively identified as cyanidin-3-rutinoside through the comparison of retention time and spectrum characters with the published data [4], [5], [6]. The relative peak area of this compound (Peak 3) was around 94% in the six red cultivars. Peak 1 and Peak 2 which putatively identified as cyanidin and cyanidin-3-glucoside represented less abundant anthocyanins which had a relative area around 1% and 5%, respectively. These results indicated that red litchi cultivars had the same composition of anthocyanins and displayed similar relative levels of these three anthocyanins.

Isolation and sequence analysis of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes

Fragments of the anthocyanin biosynthetic genes were isolated following the traditional cloning procedures including RT-PCR and TA ligation from ‘Nuomici’. Six anthocyanin biosynthetic genes, including LcCHS (450 bp), LcCHI (300 bp), LcF3H (450 bp), LcDFR (250 bp), LcANS (430 bp) and LcUFGT (950 bp), were obtained using degenerate primers (Table 2).

Table 2
Degenerate primers for cloning of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in litchi pericarp.

The full lengths or longer fragments of these genes were obtained after 3′ and 5′-RACE. And then the sequences obtained were compared with known sequences from other species using NCBI Blast server (Table 3). Genbank accession codes of the six isolated genes were listed in Table 3. The coding region of LcCHS was 1279 bp long, encoding a deduced 393-amino acid sequence. LcCHS was 81% homologous with the CHSs from Dictamnus albus. The coding sequence of LcF3H (1196 bp) which was deduced to encode a 364-amino acid sequence, showed 97% identity with that of Dimocarpus longan. The fragments for LcCHI (912 bp), LcDFR (1017 bp), LcANS (1074 bp) and LcUFGT (1560 bp) of ‘Nuomici’ showed 86%, 79%, 95% and 67% identities to those of other plants excluding Arabidopsis, respectively. In the case of UFGT, the similarity was the lowest, which was in agreement with previous reports in other plants [15], [21]. The main anthocyanin identified in litchi pericarp is cyanidin-3-rutinoside, while the cyanidin-3-glucoside level is very low and no cyanidin-3-galactoside can be detected (Fig. 3). This suggests that the key enzyme catalyzing the conversion of anthocyanidin to anthocyanin in litchi may be neither UDP glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGluT) nor UDP galactose:flavonoid 3-O-galactosyltransferase (UFGalT). Further characterization of substrate and sugar specificity of litchi UFGT will be necessary to investigate.

Table 3
Homologies based on nucleotide sequences for anthocyanin biosynthetic genes isolated from litchi cv. Nuomici.

Expression of six anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in different fruit color phenotype litchis

To elucidate the molecular mechanisms for red coloration in the pericarp of litchi, the transcripts of anthocyanin structural genes were examined in non-red, unevenly red and evenly red cultivars of litchi at maturity. Primers for real-time PCR analysis and product size were shown in Table 4. Basically, in non-red varieties, ie. ‘Kuixingqingpitian’, Xingqiumili’, ‘Yamulong’ and ‘Yongxing No. 2′, the expression of six structural genes, especially the late structural genes from F3H to UFGT was much lower than in the red cultivars (Fig. 4 A). The expression patterns of the early genes, ie. LcCHS, LcCHI, LcF3H, LcDFR and LcANS, displayed striking difference between two unevenly red cultivars, ‘Feizixiao’ and ‘Sanyuehong’. The former showed much lower expression levels than the later, though they contained comparable anthocyanins. However, they had comparable LcUFGT expression level.

Figure 4
Expression analysis of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes (A) and their correlationship with anthocyanin concentration (B) in the pericarp of twelve litchi cultivars.
Table 4
Primers for real-time PCR analysis.

To clarify the relationship between the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes and anthocyanin accumulation, their correlations were calculated among the 12 tested cultivars (Figure 4 B). The expression levels of these genes especially the late structural genes from LcF3H to LcUFGT and anthocyanin concentration in the pericarp displayed positive correlations. Significant relations were observed between the expression of LcDFR (r = 0.73) and LcUFGT (r = 0.59) and anthocyanin concentration.

Effects of ABA and CPPU on coloration and anthocyanin biosynthetic gene expression

Fruit color, concentrations of anthocyanins and the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in response to ABA and CPPU treatments were showed in Figure 5 A–C. ABA improved while CPPU delayed coloration of litchi cv. Feizixiao (Fig. 5 A), suggesting the biosynthesis of anthocyanins in the pericarp of ‘Feizixiao’ was accelerated by ABA while retarded by CPPU. In the pericarp of the control fruit, no anthcocyanin accumulation occurred before 14 days after treatment (DAT), but it was notably induced at 21 DAT, resulting in a 3.6-fold increase from 21 to 28 DAT (13.4 to 47.7 mg m−2). In the pericarp of ABA treatment, no significant accumulation of anthocyanins was detectable at 7 DAT; thereafter, a rapid accumulation from 7 to 28 DAT occurred, resulting in a 2.5-fold higher level of anthocyanins (119.5 mg m−2) than the control at harvest. In the pericarp of CPPU treatment, however, no notable anthocyanin accumulation occurred until 28 DAT, resulting a concentration which was less than one tenth of the control.

Figure 5
Effects of ABA and CPPU on pigmentation and expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes.

The expression patterns of the six tested genes were similar in the pericarp of ‘Feizixiao’ from 0 to 28 DAT with the exception of LcUFGT (Fig. 5C). The expression of LcCHS, LcCHI, LcF3H, LcDFR and LcANS was low in the pericarp of the control throughout experimental period. The expression of all these five genes was up-regulated during 0 to 14 DAT in CPPU treatment and 0 to 3 DAT in ABA treatment. The expression pattern of LcUFGT was found paralleling with anthocyanin accumulation among treatments. Expression of LcUFGT was detected in all of the red pericarps, but not in any of the non-red pericarps. Its expression was not detectable before 14 DAT, after which there was a notable expression in the control. In the pericarp with CPPU treatment, the expression of LcUFGT was hardly detectable during the whole experiment period, while a steady increase of LcUFGT expression was observed in ABA treatment.

We correlated the expression of six anthocyanin biosynthetic genes to anthocyanin concentrations in different pericarp parts with different color in ‘Feizixiao’. Regression curves and correlation coefficients are shown in Fig. 5 C. Only the expression of LcUFGT was found significantly correlated with anthocyanin concentration (r = 0.84).

Effects of bagging and debagging on anthocyanin accumulation and anthocyanin biosynthetic gene expression

Bagging and bag removal were employed to study the effects of illumination on anthocyanin accumulation and the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes (Fig. 6). Both color development and anthocyanin accumulation were greatly inhibited by bagged in the pericarp of ‘Feizixiao’, with an anthocyanin concentration being less than 10% of that of non-bagged fruit (Fig 6A). But significant anthocyanin accumulation occurred after bag removal. The concentration of anthocyanins increased by 70 times in bagged fruit at 7 days after bag removal, which was about 50% higher than that in the control. This result is consistent with previous studies on apple, pear, and peach, which indicated that sunlight exposure enhanced anthocyanin accumulation [22], [23], [24].

Figure 6
Effects of bagging and bag removal on pigmentation and expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes.

The expression of all anthocyanin biosynthetic genes was possibly inhibited by the bagging treatment and stimulated by bag removal, indicating that sufficient light was essential for expression of the anthocyanin biosynthetic genes. In a study of ‘Cripps’ Red' apples, exposure of bagged fruit to sunlight induced anthocyanin synthesis and the synthesis of anthocyanins correlated with an increase in transcript levels of flavonoid pathway genes [22]. In the present study, the six genes tested were all up-regulated after exposure to sunlight (Fig. 6 B). Among them, LcUFGT was most concurrent with anthocyanin accumulation, where low expression level was found particularly in bagged fruit at color break stage and a sharp increase after debagging.


In this study, we demonstrated that a wide range of variability among litchi cultivars in their concentrations of anthocyanins and chlorophylls and chromatic parameters at fruit maturity (Table 1, Fig. 2). Anthocyanins imparted litchi fruit red hues, while green fruit owed their color to chlorophylls. Hue angle correlated negatively with the total anthocyanin concentration (r = −0.78), but positively with chlorophyll concentration (r = 0.86) in the pericarp of litchis (Fig. 2). Generally, the same anthocyanins were present in the red cultivars with similar relative levels (Fig. 3A). The dominant anthoycanin in litchi pericarp was putatively identified as cyanidin-3-rutinoside (>93%), as previously reported by Zhang et al.in cv. Huaizhi [6].

Six genes encoding the anthocyanin biosynthesis enzymes namely LcCHS, LcCHI, LcF3H, LcDFR, LcANS and LcUFGT were isolated from the pericarp of ‘Nuomici’. These genes were highly homologous, based on BLAST matches, to those from citrus, grape and longan (Table 3). Anthocyanin accumulation was positively correlated with the expression of four anthocyanin biosynthetic genes (LcF3H, LcDFR, LcANS and LcUFGT) in pericarp of litchi (Fig. 4). The expression of these genes in non-red cultivars, ‘Kuixingqingpitian’, ‘Xingqiumili’, ‘Yamulong’ and ‘Yongxing No. 2′, was weak, whereas in the red one, ‘Feizixiao’, ‘Sanyuehong’, ‘Meiguili’, ‘Baila’, ‘Guiwei’, ‘Nuomici’ and ‘Guinuo’, it was notable. This result suggests that late anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway genes were coordinately expressed in red colored pericarp of litchi, which indicates that alterations of regulating genes may have occurred in these cultivars resulting in decreased synthesis of certain enzymes of the pathway, preventing the accumulation of anthocyanins.

In the present study, we found that the expression of the late genes in anthocyanin synthesis pathway, LcDFR and LcUFGT in particular, were consistent with the degree of anthocyanin concentration in different color genotypes of litchi. Similar results were also reported in apples [10], [12], [13] and Chinese bayberry [15], indicating that the multiple late genes determined the differential anthocyanin accumulation among different genetypes. The results differed from those reported in grapes where UFGT was found the only gene that made the difference in coloration between white type and its red sport [8], [9]. Hence, the different results might be related to the difference in genetic background of the materials studied.

Some enzymes involved in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway were studied during development or exogenous stimulus. Lister et al. reported that the activities of CHI and UGFalT in ‘Splendour’ apple were correlated with anthocyanin accumulation during fruit ripening [25]. In ‘Delicious’ and ‘Ralls’ apples exposed to light, CHS activity was not positively correlated with anthocyanin accumulation, whereas UFGalT was positively correlated with anthocyanin accumulation [26]. Moreover, they found that the rapid accumulation of anthocyanins was correlated with an increase in DFR activity in ‘Delicious’ apple [27]. These physiological studies show modification of anthocyanin accumulation by factors beyond the genetic background. In the present study, we investigated developmental changes in the expression of anthocyanin pathway genes and examined their response to growth regulators and illumination conditions (Fig 5, ,6).6). Expression of LcUFGT was not detected in any of the green pericarp either before color break or after CPPU application. Hence it appears to be independent of the expression of the other flavonoid synthetic genes in the pericarp of red litchi cv. Feizixiao.

The encoded enzyme UFGT catalyzes the glycosylation of the unstable anthocyanidin aglycones into stable anthocyanins. Only the expression of UFGT was significantly positively correlated with anthocyanin concentration in the pericarp of ‘Feizixiao’ (Fig. 5 C). Our previous studies on the activities of enzymes in anthocyanin biosynthesis including PAL, CHI, DFR and UFGT in the pericarp of ‘Feizixiao’ during fruit development and in response to bagging and growth regulator dipping treatments revealed that only the activity of UFGT was in parallel with the changes in anthocyanin concentration [28]. In the present study, ABA treatment at about one month before commercial harvest enhanced, whereas CPPU treatment at the same date inhibited the expression of LcUFGT as well as anthocyanin synthesis (Fig. 5). Accumulation of anthocyanin was also induced and the structural genes in flavonoid pathways were up-regulated in berry skin of the Cabernet Sauvignon grape by ABA application [29]. Cluster bagging inhibited, while bag removal increased both the expression of UFGT and anthocyanin accumulation (Fig. 6). All these results suggest that UFGT was the limiting factor to anthocyanin biosynthesis in the pericarp of ‘Feizixiao’.

The predominant role of UFGT in the coloration of a given red litchi cultivar suggest that LcUFGT expression was under a different regulatory regime from the other flavonoid synthetic genes. UFGT could be expressed either synchronously with or independent from other flavonoid synthetic genes.

Materials and Methods

Plant material and treatments

Fruit samples of selected twelve litchi cultivars based on their fruit color phenotypes, including four non-red skin cultivars ‘Kuixingqingpitian’, ‘Xinqiumili’, ‘Yamulong’, and ‘Yongxing No. 2′, two unevenly red cultivars ‘Feizixiao’ and ‘Sanyuehong’ and six evenly red cultivars ‘Meiguili’, ‘Baila’,‘Baitangying’, ‘Guiwei’, ‘Nuomici’ and ‘Guinuo’, were taken from Haikou, Hainan province, China and experimental orchard of South China Agricultural University in Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (as shown in Fig. 1). Thirty exposed fruit for each cultivar were picked randomly at commercial maturity. The sampling date, average fruit weight, aril total soluble solid and titratable acid of twelve litchi cultivars are listed in Table S4. After color parameter measurements, pericarp discs were sampled between 10∶00 to 11∶00 am, frozen in liquid N2, and stored at −80°C for RNA extraction and other analyses.

The growth regulator applications were carried out 4 weeks before harvest. Triplicate lots from 3 trees of cv. Feizixiao grown in the experimental orchard of South China Agricultural University were sprayed with abscisic acid (ABA, 25 mg l−1), forchlorofenron (CPPU, 4 mg l−1) and tap water (Control), respectively. After color measurement, pericarp discs were sampled on the day of growth regulator spraying (day 0) and 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatments.

In the bagging experiments, three trees of cv. Feizixiao were allotted. Ten clusters existing in different parts of the canopy of each tree were bagged with double-layer kraft paper bags at one month after full bloom. Bags were removed at color break. Clusters in similar development stage grown near the treated ones were served as the control. After color measurements, pericarp discs were sampled on the day of bag removal and on the 7th day after bag removal. All samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until use.

Color analyses

The pericarp color variables were measured on 15 fruit samples immediately after picking. L*, a*, and b* values was measured randomly with a Konica Minolta CR-10 Chroma Meter (Minolta, Japan) on the site opposite to the fruit suture. The lightness coefficient ‘L*’, represents brightness and darkness, ‘a*’ value represents greenish and redness as the value increases from negative to positive, and ‘b*’ represents bluish and yellowish. Hue angle (h*) were calculated according to the following equations [30], [31]:

h* = ATAN(b/a)/6.2823*360 when a*≥0 and b*≥0 and h* = ATAN(b/a)/6.2823*360+180 when a*<0 and b*>0.

Determination of pigments

Total anthocyanins were determined according to the method developed by Fuleki and Francis [32] which involves the measurement of the absorbance at 520 nm on samples diluted with pH 1.0 and 4.5 buffers. Four peel discs (2 cm2) were extracted with methanol/water/HCl (3 ml, 85∶12∶3, v/v) for four hours at room temperature at dark. Peel chlorophylls and caroteniods were measured according to Arnon [33].

HPLC analysis of anthocyanins

Anthocyanins were extracted as above mentioned in anthocyanin determination using a solvent containing methanol : water : HCl (85 ∶ 12 ∶ 3, v/v). The supernatants were filtered through a 0.45 µm Millipore™ filter before used. Anthocyanins in the samples were analyzed using a HP1200-DAD system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). Detection was performed at 510 nm. A NUCLEODUR® C18 column (250 mm×4.6×mm) (Pretech Instruments, Sollentuna, Sweden) was used for separation at 35°C and eluted using a mobile phase consisting of solvent A (1.6% formic acid in methanol) and solvent B (1.6% formic acid in water) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml min−1. The elution program was followed the procedure described by Wu and Prior [34] with some modifications. Solvent A was 15% initially and increased linearly in steps to 20% at 5 min, 28% at 10 min, 40% at 28 min to 40 min.

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from pericarp tissues using the RNAOUT kit (Tiandz, Beijing). DNase I (TaKaRa, Japan) was added to remove genomic DNA [35] and RNase-free columns (Tiandz, Beijing) were used for purifying total RNA. The concentration of total RNA was measured by absorbance at 260 nm using BioPhotometer Plus (Eppendorf, Germany), and the integrity and quality of the RNA was checked using agarose gel electrophoresis and A260/280 ratio. Subsequently, first-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA (2 µg) using oligo(dT) primers following the manufacturer's instructions of PrimeScript™ RT-PCR Kit (TaKaRa, Japan).

Cloning of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes

Degenerate primers were designed based on the highly conserved peptide regions of CHS, CHI, F3H, DFR, ANS and UFGT (Table 2). The cDNAs encoding these proteins were amplified by PCR using these degenerate primers. cDNAs synthesized from mature pericarp of cv. Nuomici were used as PCR templates. Amplified PCR products of appropriate length were cloned into T/A cloning vector pMD® 20-T (TaKaRa, Japan) and then transformed into E.coli DH5α Max Efficiency chemically competent cells (TaKaRa, Japan). Plasmid DNA isolated from positive E.coli cells was digested with EcoR I, and the inserted DNA was sent to Beijing Genomics Institute for sequencing.

Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) was performed to obtain the 3′and 5′ ends of these six genes in anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway from mature pericarp cv. Nuomici using 3′ -Full RACE Core Set Ver.2.0 and 5′ RACE Kit (TaKaRa, Japan). Full-length or partial-length cDNA sequences encoding CHS, CHI, F3H, DFR, ANS and UFGT enzymes are available in the GenBank nucleotide database.

Sequence analysis

Analysis of CHS, CHI, F3H, DFR, ANS, and UFGT sequences and comparing them with known sequences was carried out using NCBI Blast server [36]. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalX 1.83 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk) [37].

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Isolation of total RNA from the pericarp of litchis and synthesis first strand cDNA were performed as described above. The transcript levels of LcCHS, LcCHI, LcF3H, LcDFR, LcANS, and LcUFGT were analysed using quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) with THUNDERBIRD qPCR Mix (TOYOBO, Japan) and ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, USA), according to the manufacturers' instructions. Each reaction (final volume, 20 µl) contained 10 µl 2×SYBR® qPCR Mix (TOYOBO), 0.04 µl 50×ROX reference dye, 1 µl of each the forward and reverse primers (0.25 µM), 2 µl of the cDNA template (corresponding to 50 ng of total RNA), and 7 µl of RNase-free water. The reaction mixtures were heated to 95°C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles at 95°C for 10 s, 55°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 30 s. A melting curve was generated for each sample at the end of each run to ensure the purity of the amplified products.

All gene-specific primers from the identified genes for real-time PCR were designed using a Primer 5.0 program (PREMIER Biosoft International, Canada) (Table 4). Each assay using the gene-specific primers amplified a single product of correct size with high PCR efficiency (90%–110%) [38]. Among seven frequently used candidate reference genes, actin gene (GenBank accession number:HQ615689) was stably expressed in varieties and fruit developmental stage according to a study on selection of reliable reference genes for expression study by qRT-PCR in litchi [39]. Actin gene also exhibited expression stability in ABA and CPPU treatments (See Table S7). All qRT-PCR reactions were normalized using Ct value corresponding to the actin gene. The relative expression levels of target genes were calculated with formula 2−▵▵CT [40]. Values reported represent the average of three biological replicate.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package DPS v3.0 (Hangzhou, China). Duncan multiple range test was used to determine significance of color parameter differences at the 5% level. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated and a two-tailed test was used to determine significance at the 5% level.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

HPLC elution profile of anthocyanins from pericarp of full red litchi cultivars.


Table S1

Results of ANOVA test for L*, a*, b*and h* among twelve cultivars.


Table S2

Results of ANOVA test on relative coefficients between anthocyanin concentration and gene expression level in the pericarp of twelve cultivars.


Table S3

Results of ANOVA test on relative coefficients between anthocyanin concentration and gene expression level in the pericarp of different pigmentation pericarp of ‘Feizixiao’.


Table S4

Sampling date, fruit weight, total soluble solid and titratable acid of litchis at maturity.


Table S5

Cloning of LcCHS, LcCHI, LcF3H, LcDFR, LcANS and LcUFGT.


Table S6

Cloning and identification of LcActin.


Table S7

Evaluating the expression stability of reference genes.



We thank Drs. Yong-Hua Qin, Jian-Guo Li and Hou-Bin Chen for technical assistance and reading of the manuscript.


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: The project was supported by National Natural Science Fund of China (Project No. 30971985), Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (Project No. nyhyzx07-31) and China Litchi Industry Technology Research System (Project No. nycytx-32), Ministry of Agriculture, China. The funders had no role in study design, data colletion and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Macheix, JJ, Fluriet A, Billot J. Fruit Phenolics. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 1990;378
2. Holton TA, Cornish EC. Genetics and biochemistry of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1071–1083. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Deroles S. Anthocyanin biosynthesis in plant cell cultures: A potential source of natural colourants. In: Kevin G, Kevin D, Chris W (eds) Anthocyanins: Biosynthesis, functions and applications. 107-117. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC., New York, USA. 2009;329
4. Lee HS, Wicker L. Anthocyanin pigments in the skin of lychee fruit. J Food Sci. 1991;56:446–468.
5. Rivera-López J, Ordorrica-Falomir C, Wesche-Ebeling P. Changes in anthocyanin concentration in Lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) pericarp during maturation. Food Chem. 1999;65:195–200.
6. Zhang Z, Pang X, Yang C, Ji Z, Jiang Y. Purification and structural analysis of anthocyanins from litchi pericarp. Food Chem. 2004;84:601–604.
7. Wheelwright NT, Janson CH. Colors of fruit displays of bird-dispersed plants in two tropical forests. Am. Nat. 1985;126:777–799.
8. Boss PK, Davies C, Robinson SP. Expression of anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway genes in red and white grape. Plant Mol Bio. 1996;32:565–569. [PubMed]
9. Kobayashi S, Ishimaru M, Ding CK, Yakushiji H, Goto N. Comparison of UDP-glucose: flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT) gene sequences between white grapes (Vitis vinifera) and their sports with red skin. Plant Sci. 2001;160:543–550. [PubMed]
10. Honda C, Kotoda N, Wada M, Kondo S, Kobayashi S, et al. Anthocyanin biosynthetic genes are coordinately expressed during red coloration in apple skin. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2002;40:955–962.
11. Kobayashi S, Ishimaru M, Hiraoka K, Honda C. Myb-related genes of the Kyoho grape (Vitis labruscana) regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis. Planta. 2002;215:924–933. [PubMed]
12. Takos AM, Jaffé ´ FW, Jacob SR, Bogs J, Robinson SP, et al. Light-induced expression of a MYB gene regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in red apples. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:1216–1232. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Espley RV, Hellens RP, Putterill J, Stevenson DE, Kutty-Amma S, et al. Red colouration in apple fruit is due to the activity of the MYB transcription factor, MdMYB10. Plant J. 2007;49:414–427. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Palapol Y, Ketsa S, Lin-Wang K, Ferguson IB, Allan AC. A MYB transcription factor regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) fruit during ripening. Planta. 2009;229:1323–1334. [PubMed]
15. Niu SS, Xu CJ, Zhang WS, Zhang B, Li X, et al. Coordinated regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra) fruit by a R2R3MYB transpription factor. Planta. 2010;231:887–899. [PubMed]
16. Zhang X, Allan AC, Yi Q, Chen L, Li K, et al. Differential gene expression analysis of Yunan red pear, Pyrus Pyrifolia, during fruit skin coloration. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2010 DOI 10.1007/s11105-010-0231-z.
17. Chen D, Li P, Hu G, Ouyang R, Gao F, et al. Effect of bagging on fruit coloration of litchi (litchi chinensis Sonn. cv. Feizixiao). J South China Agricultural University. 1999;20:65–69.
18. Wang H, Huang H, Huang X. Differential effects of abscisic acid and ethylene on the fruit maturation of Litchi chinensis Sonn. Plant Growth Regul. 2007;52:189–198.
19. Underhill S, Critchley C. Anthocyanin decolorisation and its role in lychee pericap browning. Aust J Experi Agric. 1994;34:115–122.
20. Gonçalves B, Silva AP, Moutinho-Pereira J, Bacelar E, Rosa E, et al. Effect of ripeness and postharvest storage on the evolution of colour and anthocyanins in cherries (Prunus avium L.). Food Chem, 2007;103:976–984.
21. Kim SH, Lee JR, Hong ST, Yoo YK, An G, et al. Molecular cloning and analysis of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes preferentially expressed in apple skin. Plant Sci. 2003;165:403–413.
22. Takos AM, Robinson SP, Walker AR. Transcriptional regulation of the flavonoid pathway in the skin of dark-grown ‘Cripps’ Red’ apples in response to sunlight. J Hortic Sci Biotech, 2006;81:735–744.
23. Feng SQ, Wang YL, Yang S, Xu YT, Chen XS. Anthocyanin biosynthesis in pears is regulated by a R2R3-MyB transcription factor PyMYB10. Planta, 2010;232:245–255. [PubMed]
24. Jia HJ, Araki A, Okamoto G. Influence of fruit bagging on aroma volatiles and skin coloration of ‘Hakuho’ peach (Prunus persica Batsch). Post Harvest Biol Technol. 2005;35:61–68.
25. Lister CE, Lancaster JE, Walker JRL. Developmental changes in enzymes of flavonoid biosynthesis in the skins of red and green apple cultivars. J Sci Food Agric. 1996;71:313–320.
26. Ju Z, Liu C, Yuan Y. Acitivties of chalcone synthase and UDPGal: flavonoid-3-o-glycosyltransferase in relation to anthocyanin synthesis in apple. Sci Hortic. 1995;63:175–185.
27. Ju Z, Yuan Y, Liu C, Wang Y, Tian X. Dihydroflavonol reductase activity and anthocyanin accumulation in ‘Delicious’, ‘Golden Delicious’ and ‘Indo’ apples. Sci Hortic. 1997;70:31–43.
28. Wang H, Huang X, Hu G, Huang H. Studies on the relationship between anthocyanin biosynthesis and related enzymes in litchi pericarp. Sci Agric Sinica. 2004;37:2028–2032.
29. Koyama K, Sadamatsu K, Goto-Yamamoto N. Abscisic acid stimulated ripening and gene expression in berry skins of the Cabernet Sauvignon grape. Funct Integr Genomic. 2010;10:367–381. [PubMed]
30. McGuire RG. Reporting of objective colour measurements. HortSci. 1992;27:1254–1255.
31. Voss DH. Relating colorimeter measurement of plant colour to the Royal Horticultural society colour chart. HortSci. 1992;27:1256–1260.
32. Fuleki T, Francis FJ. Quantitative methods for anthocyanins. 2. Determination of total anthocyanin and degradation index for cranberry juice. J Food Sci. 1968;33:78–83.
33. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chlroplasts. Polyphenoxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949;24:1–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Wu X, Prior RL. Identification and characterization of anthocyanins by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry in common foods in the United States: Vegetables, nuts, and grains. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:3101–3113. [PubMed]
35. Huang Z, Fasco MJ, Kaminsky LS. Optimization of Dnase I removal of contaminating DNA from RNA for use in quantitative RNA-PCR. Biotechniques. 1996;20:1012–1020. [PubMed]
36. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Lefever S, Hellemans J, Pattyn F, Przybylski DR, Tayor C, et al. RDML: Structured language and reporting guidelines for real-time quantitative PCR data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:2065–2069. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Zhong HY, Chen JW, Li CQ, Chen L, Wu JY, et al. Selection of reliable reference genes for expression studies by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR in litchi under different experimental conditions. Plant Cell report. 2010 DOI 10.1007/s00299-010-0992-8. [PubMed]
40. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25, 2001;402-408 [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Compound
    PubChem chemical compound records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records. Multiple substance records may contribute to the PubChem compound record.
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Nucleotide
    Primary database (GenBank) nucleotide records reported in the current articles as well as Reference Sequences (RefSeqs) that include the articles as references.
  • Protein
    Protein translation features of primary database (GenBank) nucleotide records reported in the current articles as well as Reference Sequences (RefSeqs) that include the articles as references.
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem chemical substance records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records.

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...