• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Clin Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC Apr 15, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3079023
NIHMSID: NIHMS268047

CXCL12 (SDF1α) – CXCR4/CXCR7 Pathway Inhibition: An Emerging Sensitizer for Anti-Cancer Therapies?

Abstract

Addition of multiple molecularly targeted agents to the existing armamentarium of chemotherapeutics and radiotherapies represents a significant advance in the management of several advanced cancers. In certain tumor types with no efficacious therapy options, these agents have become the first line of therapy, e.g., sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma or bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma. Unfortunately, in many cases, the survival benefits are modest, lasting only weeks to a few months. Moreover, they may not show benefit in patients with localized disease (i.e., in adjuvant setting). Recent studies have provided increasing evidence that activation of the chemokine CXCL12 (SDF1α) pathway is a potential mechanism of tumor resistance to both conventional therapies and biological agents via multiple complementary actions: (i) by directly promoting cancer cell survival, invasion and the cancer stem/tumor-initiating cell phenotype; (ii) by recruiting “distal stroma” (i.e., myeloid bone marrow-derived cells) to indirectly facilitate tumor recurrence and metastasis; and (iii) by promoting angiogenesis directly or in a paracrine manner. Here, we discuss recent preclinical and clinical data that support the potential use of anti-CXCL12 agents (e.g., AMD3100, NOX-A12 or CCX2066) as sensitizers to currently available therapies by targeting the CXCL12/CXCR4 and CXCL12/CXCR7 pathways.

Background

The addition of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-based therapies to existing cytotoxic treatments has changed clinical practice as well as the research directions in advanced glioblastoma (GBM), colorectal cancer, lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (14). Unfortunately, the overall survival benefits in patients with these malignancies remain modest despite exceedingly high financial costs (512). Clearly, development of novel approaches to maximize the efficacy of available treatments remains a major priority in oncology.

Chemokines, a family of small cytokines, play an important role in leukocyte migration (13). There are over 50 chemokines, all with four conserved cysteins that form two essential disulphide bonds. Chemokines interact with a group of over 20 C-C or C-X-C seven trans-membrane domain G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs, reviewed in (14)). Although initially of clinical interest for immunology and diseases such as HIV/AIDS, chemokine pathways have become an important area of investigation for cancer therapy (14, 15).

An emerging chemokine target for cancer therapy is CXCL12, also known as the stromal-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF1α), which binds and initiates signaling through its cognate receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 (14, 16, 17). CXCL12 is a specific ligand for CXCR4 whereas CXCL11 binds CXCR7 as well. Knockout studies of CXCL12, CXCR4, or CXCR7 have shown lethality in mice either during embryonic development or perinatally (1820). This emphasizes that the pleiotropic activity of CXCL12 pathway is critical for hematopoietic, neural, vascular, craniofacial organogenesis and cardiac development. Activation of CXCR4 or CXCR7 signaling may affect several major signaling pathways related to cell survival, proliferation and migration (see Figure 1). For example, CXCL12 activates PI3K/Akt, IP3, and MAPK pathways via CXCR4, thus regulating cell survival, proliferation and chemotaxis. CXCR4 signaling can be modulated by β–arrestin-mediated internalization of the receptor. Much less is known about CXCL12 signaling via CXCR7, which was initially thought to serve primarily as a sink for CXCL12 (2123). Indeed, when CXCR7 is activated by CXCL12, the classical GPCR mobilization of Ca2+ is not observed (24). Rather, the β-arrestin pathway is activated and scavenges CXCL12 (22, 25). CXCR4 and CXCR7 can also form heterodimers, whereby CXCR7 changes the conformation of the CXCR4/G-protein complexes and abrogates its signaling (26). Finally, CXCR7 can signal through the PLC/MAPK pathway and increase cell survival in gliomas (27).

Figure 1
CXCL12 pathway

Because CXCR4 is a marker of hematopoietic cells in adults, much research has been dedicated to its role in hematopoiesis (and in particular to stem cell trafficking) as well as its involvement in leukemias (recently reviewed by Teicher and Fricker in (28)). In solid tumors, CXCR4 can be markedly overexpressed compared with normal tissues, and is present primarily on cancer cells (14, 2935). Similarly, CXCR7 is highly expressed on certain cancer cells (14, 27). Some studies have demonstrated a direct correlation between receptor upregulation in cancer cells and tumor growth/progression, neovascularization, invasion and metastasis (3639). CXCL12 expression is also detected in various cancer cells, which is consistent with autocrine signaling (29, 35). However, unlike CXCR4, this chemokine is also abundant in many normal tissues (14). In addition, in solid tumors different stromal cells express CXCL12 and/or its receptors can be involved in paracrine interactions to promote tumor progression. Stromal (myo)fibroblasts in some cases may be a major source of secreted CXCL12 in tumor tissue (17, 40, 41). Blood vascular endothelial cells express both CXCL12 and its receptors (27, 37). Moreover, CXCL12 is significantly involved in recruitment of various bone marrow-derived cells (BMDCs) expressing CXCR4, including CD11b+ myelomonocytes (that differentiate into macrophages with pro-vascular activity) (42, 43), and endothelial precursor cells and “hemangiocytes” that may directly incorporate in tumor vessels (40, 44, 45).

In gliomas, CXCL12 and both its receptors are expressed in the cancer cells themselves. The CXCR4/CXCL12 axis is particularly prevalent in pseudopalisading zones surrounding the necrotic foci and in invading glioma cells (35, 46, 47). A recent study revealed more complexity in the axis when CXCR4 was found on glioma stem-like cells while more abundant expression of CXCR7 was found on “differentiated” glioma cells, which mediated their resistance to apoptosis (27). Interestingly, a recent study has suggested a role for CXCR4 in modulation of neural stem cell migration and engraftment (48). Both receptors were also found on tumor-associated endothelial cells (27, 46), and CXCR7 on microglia (27). On the other hand, hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) activation, which can induce local expression of VEGF, placenta growth factor (PlGF), VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1) and CXCL12, was shown to enhance the recruitment of multiple bone marrow-derived cell (BMDC) populations via CXCR4 pathway (42). Finally, growth factors such as PDGF-D could upregulate CXCR4 and increase lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer (39).

In addition, CXCL12 signaling may indirectly promote tumor growth. For example, it can transactivate Her2/neu in breast cancer cells or trigger an “angiogenic switch” through upregulation of VEGF and IL-8 in prostate cancer (36, 49, 50). CXCR4 has also been identified as marker of sprouting endothelial cells (referred to as “tip cells”) (51) and can mediate VEGF expression through the transcription factor Yin Yang 1 (51, 52). However, of note, CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway may also affect tumor angiogenesis independently of the VEGF pathway – the main target of currently approved antiangiogenic drugs (53, 54)(see below).

In summary, activation of CXCL12 pathway may be critical for tumor progression via multiple complementary mechanisms: (i) by directly promoting cancer cell survival, invasion and stem/tumor-initiating cell phenotype; (ii) by recruiting “distal stroma” (i.e., myeloid BMDC) to indirectly facilitate tumor growth and metastasis; and (iii) by promoting angiogenesis either directly or in a paracrine manner, to support tumor growth. Future investigation should unravel the intricate roles of CXCR7 versus CXCR4 in different cancers and, in particular, confirm whether CXCL12 pathway also mediates cancer stem-like cell survival and migration, similar to normal adult stem cells. All this raises the exciting possibility that blocking CXCL12 pathway may be a valid strategy to target various components in solid tumors.

Clinical-Translational Advances

Based on these hypotheses, multiple agents are currently being developed to target the CXCL12 pathway in cancer. These agents include the anti-CXCR4 drug AMD3100, also known as plerixafor (Mozobil®); the CXCL12 analogue CTCE-9908 (Chemokine Therapeutics, Canada); the anti-CXCL12 aptamer Nox-A12 (Noxxon, Germany), the CXCR7-specific inhibitor CCX2066 (ChemoCentryx, Mountain View, CA) (5557). In addition, other strategies to inhibit CXCL12 pathway [e.g., the agent chalcone 4 (C7870, Sigma) or RNA interference]—that provided important insights into regulation of the pathway—could also be potentially tested for the therapy of solid tumors (37, 50, 58, 59). Of these, AMD3100 and CTCE-9908 are approved for clinical use in patients with leukemias (for stem cell mobilization) and osteosarcoma, respectively (14, 56).

Will blockade of CXCL12 pathway alone be efficacious in solid tumors?

Multiple preclinical studies converged to the finding that anti-CXCL12 agents can significantly delay primary tumor growth and metastasis when treatment is started at or close to the time of tumor implantation (i.e., in a “preventive” setting) (14, 3034). However, blockade of CXCL12 pathway had minor antitumor effects on established tumors: Although CXCR4 antagonists did inhibit tumor growth in some cases (60, 61), they were ineffective in others (6265). Thus, these preclinical studies suggest that blocking CXCL12 pathway alone may be not be sufficient except for certain solid tumors.

One potential setting in which blockade of CXCL12 pathway may be more widely efficacious is in preventing or delaying metastasis. Indeed, previous studies have shown that CXCL12 pathway is a key mediator of metastasis in prostate, colorectal and breast cancer (33, 54, 58). Since VEGF blockade has failed so far to prevent metastasis in mice and in patients (6669), evaluation of CXCL12 blockade has emerged as a potential additional or alternative target for neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment (70). However, clinical translation of anti-CXCL12 therapy in this setting will require combinations with standard neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments (see below).

Blocking CXCL12 pathway in combination with other therapies may prevent tumor recurrence: What is the preclinical evidence?

In contrast to monotherapy, the use of anti-CXCL12 therapy in combination with other anti-cancer treatments showed promising efficacy in most studies (see Table 1). One reason could be that CXCL12 pathway is activated in response to various therapies and may be an important mechanism of acquired resistance to them. This hypothesis is consistent with results from recent preclinical and clinical studies of antiangiogenic therapy, chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Our studies showed that treatment with the pan-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor cediranib leads to an increase in circulating CXCL12 concentrations and CXCR4+ cells as well as in myeloid BMDC infiltration in brain tumors as seen in clinical studies (7174). In addition, using genetic models, we found that the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway activation can compensate for specific inhibition of VEGFR1 activity in BMDCs and promote angiogenesis, tumor growth and metastasis by recruiting Gr1+ myeloid BMDCs to the tumor (54). Others have shown that certain chemotherapeutics (e.g. paclitaxel) or vascular-disrupting agents rapidly increased both circulating CXCL12 levels and the mobilization of BMDCs (75, 76). Finally, local irradiation directly increased CXCL12 expression in tumors both directly and indirectly (secondary to treatment-induced hypoxia and HIF1α activation), and increased the recruitment of myeloid BMDCs (62, 63, 77).

Table 1
Evidence suggesting the potential use of CXCL12 inhibition for sensitization of solid tumors to other treatments

To date, several studies have evaluated the role of therapy-induced activation of CXCL12 pathway as a mechanism of resistance to therapy with cytotoxics. For example, orthotopic U87 gliomas showed a substantial growth inhibition after chemotherapy (BCNU) with AMD3100, although the two treatments had no effect when given as monotherapy (64). Similarly, combination of AMD3100 with irradiation induced a significant tumor growth delay and increased curability in brain, lung and breast tumors (62, 63). However, treatment with AMD3100 commenced 5 days after irradiation had no significant effect in lung and breast tumors (62). These studies emphasize that it is critical to understand the temporal role of the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway activation in a tumor-dependent manner in pre-clinical models to identify optimal schedules for combining inhibitors against this pathway with other therapeutic agents in cancer patients.

Blocking CXCL12 pathway for tumor sensitization to other therapies: What is the clinical evidence?

The preclinical data discussed above is strongly supported by clinical studies, particularly in brain tumors. For example, clinical correlative studies have shown that elevated expression of CXCL12, CXCR4 and CXCR7 is associated with higher tumor grade and invasion and decreased apoptosis in GBM (27, 47, 78). In our clinical studies, we found that circulating plasma CXCL12 levels significantly correlated with progression in recurrent GBM after treatment with the pan-anti-VEGFR agent cediranib (71, 72) (Table 1). Of note, one of the most striking features in the recurrent GBMs after cediranib therapy was the emergence of an infiltrative tumor phenotype with a diffuse tumor with relatively normal blood vessels and reduced necrosis (74).

Treatment-induced increase in CXCL12 and CXCR4 expression in cancer cells has also been documented in clinical studies of neoadjuvant anti-VEGF therapy in rectal cancer (79). Importantly, increased circulating plasma CXCL12 after neoadjuvant anti-VEGF therapy with chemoradiation was associated with development of metastatic disease at three years (79). In addition, in our clinical trials we found circulating plasma CXCL12 levels significantly correlated with progression in advanced HCC and in soft tissue sarcoma after treatment with anti-VEGF agents (80, 81) (Table 1). Collectively, these clinical data are consistent with CXCL12 pathway being a potential target to prevent progression in GBM and improve neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for other solid tumors. However, important challenges remain prior to the translation of these promising findings into the clinic.

Clinical implications, challenges and future direction

The convergence to the CXCL12 pathway in studies of multiple tumor types strongly suggests that: (i) tumors in different organs exploit this common pathway to spread and escape from therapy; and (ii) the systemic effects of CXCL12 pathway activation on BMDCs and local stroma are critical. Blockade of CXCL12 in adjuvant setting has been proposed several years ago to prevent breast cancer cell chemotaxis (70). However, no clinical trial has tested to date this concept in solid tumors. Moreover, future research should consider the role of CXCR7, which is clearly emerging as a potentially important pathway in solid tumors. Gaining a more in depth understanding of the CXCL12/CXCR7 pathway in preclinical studies is urgently needed to inform the future translation of CXCL12, CXCR4 or CXCR7 inhibitors into the clinic.

To bridge these gaps in our knowledge, preclinical models should be developed to closely recapitulate the clinical features and the response to targeted or cytotoxic therapies as seen in patients. This will be critical in determining the causal role of CXCL12 pathway in tumor progression, and then rapidly translating the pre-clinical findings to the clinic to prolong survival in patients with advanced cancers beyond what is possible with currently approved therapies. This should be facilitated by the fact that the CXCR4 blocker AMD3100 is an FDA-approved drug with a relatively mild toxicity profile (55, 82). However, the optimal dosing of AMD3100 with anti-VEGF agents, chemotherapy or radiation will be a challenge in patients with solid tumors. In preclinical studies, AMD3100 is often given continuously with an infusion pump for tumor therapy, whereas in the clinic it is given as a daily s.c. injection with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for a limited time (1–7 days) to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells into the circulation prior to transplantation (82). Only a mechanistic understanding of action of CXCL12 pathway in solid tumors could provide novel insight into how to use this drug safely for improved cancer treatment. Moreover, CXCR4 blockade with AMD3100 may not be sufficient to block the effects of CXCL12, which may also bind to CXCR7 on cancer or stromal cells. This could be studied using Nox-A12, an aptamer against CXCL12, or with CXCR7-specific inhibitors such as CCX2066. Finally, as we move forward with the development of inhibitors of the CXCL12 pathway for solid tumors, a critical issue will become the development of biomarkers. Currently, there are no approved biomarkers for anti-VEGF agents or AMD3100 (6). Thus, mechanistic studies and biology-driven, rational design of novel combination therapies will be critical for successfully pursuing this pathway as a novel target for sensitization to existing therapies (83). Overcoming these challenges would increase the chances of realizing the promise of CXCL12 pathway inhibition as a potentially effective strategy to decrease the rates of local and distant failure after currently available therapies for solid tumor.

Acknowledgments

Grant Support

NIH grants P01-CA080124, R01-CA115767, R01-CA085140, R01-CA126642, T32-CA073479, R21-CA139168, R01-CA096915 and Federal Share/NCI Proton Beam Program Income, Department of Defense Award W81XWH-10-1-0016, American Cancer Society Grant RSG-11-073-01-TBG, and a National Foundation for Cancer Research Grant.

Footnotes

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

R.K. Jain: commercial research grant, Dyax, AstraZeneca, and MedImmune; consultant/advisory board, AstraZeneca, Dyax, Astellas-Fibrogen, Regeneron, SynDevRx, Genzyme, Morphosys, and Noxxon Pharma; speaker honorarium, Genzyme; stock ownership, SynDevRx. Dan G. Duda, Sergey V. Kozin, Nathaniel D. Kirkpatrick, Lei Xu and Dai Fukumura disclosed no potential conflicts of interest.

References

1. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. New Engl J Med. 2004;350:2335–42. [PubMed]
2. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. New Engl J Med. 2006;355:2542–50. [PubMed]
3. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. New Engl J Med. 2008;359:378–90. [PubMed]
4. Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY, et al. Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4733–40. [PubMed]
5. Jain RK, Duda DG, Clark JW, Loeffler JS. Lessons from phase III clinical trials on anti-VEGF therapy for cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006;3:24–40. [PubMed]
6. Jain RK, Duda DG, Willett CG, et al. Biomarkers of response and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6:327–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Loges S, Mazzone M, Hohensinner P, Carmeliet P. Silencing or fueling metastasis with VEGF inhibitors: antiangiogenesis revisited. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:167–70. [PubMed]
8. Heath VL, Bicknell R. Anticancer strategies involving the vasculature. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6:395–404. [PubMed]
9. Chen HX, Cleck JN. Adverse effects of anticancer agents that target the VEGF pathway. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6:465–77. [PubMed]
10. Grothey A, Galanis E. Targeting angiogenesis: progress with anti-VEGF treatment with large molecules. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6:507–18. [PubMed]
11. Ivy SP, Wick JY, Kaufman BM. An overview of small-molecule inhibitors of VEGFR signaling. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6:569–79. [PubMed]
12. Fojo T, Parkinson DR. Biologically targeted cancer therapy and marginal benefits: Are we making too much of too little or are we achieving too little by giving too much? Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5972–80. [PubMed]
13. Baggiolini M. Chemokines and leukocyte traffic. Nature. 1998;392:565–8. [PubMed]
14. Sun X, Cheng G, Hao M, et al. CXCL12 / CXCR4 / CXCR7 chemokine axis and cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2010;29:709–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Homey B, Alenius H, Muller A, et al. CCL27-CCR10 interactions regulate T cell-mediated skin inflammation. Nat Med. 2002;8:157–65. [PubMed]
16. Muller A, Homey B, Soto H, et al. Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2001;410:50–6. [PubMed]
17. Kojima Y, Acar A, Eaton EN, et al. Autocrine TGF-beta and stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) signaling drives the evolution of tumor-promoting mammary stromal myofibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:20009–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Nagasawa T, Hirota S, Tachibana K, et al. Defects of B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone-marrow myelopoiesis in mice lacking the CXC chemokine PBSF/SDF-1. Nature. 1996;382:635–8. [PubMed]
19. Tachibana K, Hirota S, Iizasa H, et al. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is essential for vascularization of the gastrointestinal tract. Nature. 1998;393:591–4. [PubMed]
20. Sierro F, Biben C, Martinez-Munoz L, et al. Disrupted cardiac development but normal hematopoiesis in mice deficient in the second CXCL12/SDF-1 receptor, CXCR7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:14759–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Balabanian K, Lagane B, Infantino S, et al. The chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12 binds to and signals through the orphan receptor RDC1 in T lymphocytes. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:35760–6. [PubMed]
22. Boldajipour B, Mahabaleshwar H, Kardash E, et al. Control of chemokine-guided cell migration by ligand sequestration. Cell. 2008;132:463–73. [PubMed]
23. Thelen M, Thelen S. CXCR7, CXCR4 and CXCL12: an eccentric trio? J Neuroimmunol. 2008;198:9–13. [PubMed]
24. Zabel BA, Wang Y, Lewen S, et al. Elucidation of CXCR7-mediated signaling events and inhibition of CXCR4-mediated tumor cell transendothelial migration by CXCR7 ligands. J Immunol. 2009;183:3204–11. [PubMed]
25. Kalatskaya I, Berchiche YA, Gravel S, Limberg BJ, Rosenbaum JS, Heveker N. AMD3100 is a CXCR7 ligand with allosteric agonist properties. Mol Pharmacol. 2009;75:1240–7. [PubMed]
26. Levoye A, Balabanian K, Baleux F, Bachelerie F, Lagane B. CXCR7 heterodimerizes with CXCR4 and regulates CXCL12-mediated G protein signaling. Blood. 2009;113:6085–93. [PubMed]
27. Hattermann K, Held-Feindt J, Lucius R, et al. The chemokine receptor CXCR7 is highly expressed in human glioma cells and mediates antiapoptotic effects. Cancer Res. 2010;70:3299–308. [PubMed]
28. Teicher BA, Fricker SP. CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:2927–31. [PubMed]
29. Balkwill F. Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:540–50. [PubMed]
30. Richert MM, Vaidya KS, Mills CN, et al. Inhibition of CXCR4 by CTCE-9908 inhibits breast cancer metastasis to lung and bone. Oncol Rep. 2009;21:761–7. [PubMed]
31. Sun YX, Schneider A, Jung Y, et al. Skeletal localization and neutralization of the SDF-1(CXCL12)/CXCR4 axis blocks prostate cancer metastasis and growth in osseous sites in vivo. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:318–29. [PubMed]
32. Huang EH, Singh B, Cristofanilli M, et al. A CXCR4 antagonist CTCE-9908 inhibits primary tumor growth and metastasis of breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2009;155:231–6. [PubMed]
33. Matsusue R, Kubo H, Hisamori S, et al. Hepatic stellate cells promote liver metastasis of colon cancer cells by the action of SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2645–53. [PubMed]
34. Ma WF, Du J, Fu LP, Fang R, Chen HY, Cai SH. Phenotypic knockout of CXCR4 by a novel recombinant protein TAT/54R/KDEL inhibits tumors metastasis. Mol Cancer Res. 2009;7:1613–21. [PubMed]
35. Sciume G, Santoni A, Bernardini G. Chemokines and glioma: invasion and more. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;224:8–12. [PubMed]
36. Hinton CV, Avraham S, Avraham HK. Role of the CXCR4/CXCL12 signaling axis in breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2010;27:97–105. [PubMed]
37. Miao Z, Luker KE, Summers BC, et al. CXCR7 (RDC1) promotes breast and lung tumor growth in vivo and is expressed on tumor-associated vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:15735–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Darash-Yahana M, Pikarsky E, Abramovitch R, et al. Role of high expression levels of CXCR4 in tumor growth, vascularization, and metastasis. FASEB J. 2004;18:1240–2. [PubMed]
39. Liu J, Liao S, Huang Y, et al. PDGF-D improves drug delivery and efficacy via vascular normalization, but promotes lymphatic metastasis by activating CXCR4 in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 (in press) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Orimo A, Gupta PB, Sgroi DC, et al. Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion. Cell. 2005;121:335–48. [PubMed]
41. Kishimoto H, Wang Z, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Chang D, Clarke R, Nakshatri H. The p160 family coactivators regulate breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion through autocrine/paracrine activity of SDF-1alpha/CXCL12. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1706–15. [PubMed]
42. Du R, Lu KV, Petritsch C, et al. HIF1alpha induces the recruitment of bone marrow-derived vascular modulatory cells to regulate tumor angiogenesis and invasion. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:206–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. De Palma M, Venneri MA, Galli R, et al. Tie2 identifies a hematopoietic lineage of proangiogenic monocytes required for tumor vessel formation and a mesenchymal population of pericyte progenitors. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:211–26. [PubMed]
44. Petit I, Jin D, Rafii S. The SDF-1-CXCR4 signaling pathway: a molecular hub modulating neo-angiogenesis. Trends Immunol. 2007;28:299–307. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Jin DK, Shido K, Kopp HG, et al. Cytokine-mediated deployment of SDF-1 induces revascularization through recruitment of CXCR4+ hemangiocytes. Nat Med. 2006;12:557–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Rempel SA, Dudas S, Ge S, Gutierrez JA. Identification and localization of the cytokine SDF1 and its receptor, CXC chemokine receptor 4, to regions of necrosis and angiogenesis in human glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:102–11. [PubMed]
47. Zagzag D, Esencay M, Mendez O, et al. Hypoxia- and vascular endothelial growth factor-induced stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha/CXCR4 expression in glioblastomas: one plausible explanation of Scherer's structures. Am J Pathol. 2008;173:545–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Carbajal KS, Schaumburg C, Strieter R, Kane J, Lane TE. Migration of engrafted neural stem cells is mediated by CXCL12 signaling through CXCR4 in a viral model of multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:11068–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Cabioglu N, Summy J, Miller C, et al. CXCL-12/stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha transactivates HER2-neu in breast cancer cells by a novel pathway involving Src kinase activation. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6493–7. [PubMed]
50. Wang J, Sun Y, Song W, Nor JE, Wang CY, Taichman RS. Diverse signaling pathways through the SDF-1/CXCR4 chemokine axis in prostate cancer cell lines leads to altered patterns of cytokine secretion and angiogenesis. Cell Signal. 2005;17:1578–92. [PubMed]
51. Strasser GA, Kaminker JS, Tessier-Lavigne M. Microarray analysis of retinal endothelial tip cells identifies CXCR4 as a mediator of tip cell morphology and branching. Blood. 2010;115:5102–10. [PubMed]
52. de Nigris F, Crudele V, Giovane A, et al. CXCR4/YY1 inhibition impairs VEGF network and angiogenesis during malignancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14484–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Kryczek I, Lange A, Mottram P, et al. CXCL12 and vascular endothelial growth factor synergistically induce neoangiogenesis in human ovarian cancers. Cancer Res. 2005;65:465–72. [PubMed]
54. Hiratsuka S, Duda DG, Huang Y, et al. C-X-C receptor type 4 promotes metastasis by activating p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in myeloid differentiation-antigen (Gr-1) positive cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:302–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Donzella GA, Schols D, Lin SW, et al. AMD3100, a small molecule inhibitor of HIV-1 entry via the CXCR4 co-receptor. Nat Med. 1998;4:72–7. [PubMed]
56. Burger JA, Stewart DJ. CXCR4 chemokine receptor antagonists: perspectives in SCLC. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18:481–90. [PubMed]
57. Sayyed SG, Hagele H, Kulkarni OP, et al. Podocytes produce homeostatic chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCL12, which contributes to glomerulosclerosis, podocyte loss and albuminuria in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2009;52:2445–54. [PubMed]
58. Lapteva N, Yang AG, Sanders DE, Strube RW, Chen SY. CXCR4 knockdown by small interfering RNA abrogates breast tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Gene Ther. 2005;12:84–9. [PubMed]
59. Sowinska A, Jagodzinski PP. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of DNMT1 and DNMT3B induces CXCL12 expression in MCF-7 breast cancer and AsPC1 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2007;255:153–9. [PubMed]
60. Rubin JB, Kung AL, Klein RS, et al. A small-molecule antagonist of CXCR4 inhibits intracranial growth of primary brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:13513–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Porvasnik S, Sakamoto N, Kusmartsev S, et al. Effects of CXCR4 antagonist CTCE-9908 on prostate tumor growth. Prostate. 2009;69:1460–9. [PubMed]
62. Kozin SV, Kamoun W, Huang Y, Dawson MR, Jain RK, Duda DG. Recruitment of myeloid but not endothelial precursor cells facilitates tumor re-growth after local irradiation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5679–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Kioi M, Vogel H, Schultz G, Hoffman RM, Harsh GR, Brown JM. Inhibition of vasculogenesis, but not angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence of glioblastoma after irradiation in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:694–705. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Redjal N, Chan JA, Segal RA, Kung AL. CXCR4 inhibition synergizes with cytotoxic chemotherapy in gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6765–71. [PubMed]
65. Singh S, Srivastava SK, Bhardwaj A, Owen LB, Singh AP. CXCL12-CXCR4 signalling axis confers gemcitabine resistance to pancreatic cancer cells: a novel target for therapy. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:1671–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Allegra CJ, Yothers G, O'Connell MJ, et al. Phase III Trial Assessing Bevacizumab in Stages II and III Carcinoma of the Colon: Results of NSABP Protocol C-08. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:11–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Dawson MR, Duda DG, Fukumura D, Jain RK. VEGFR1-activity-independent metastasis formation. Nature. 2009;461:E4–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Van Cutsem E, Lambrechts D, Prenen H, Jain RK, Carmeliet P. Lessons from the adjuvant bevacizumab trial in colon cancer: what next? J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1–4. [PubMed]
69. Willett CG, Duda DG, Ancukiewicz M, et al. A safety and survival analysis of neoadjuvant bevacizumab with standard chemoradiation in a phase I/II study compared with standard chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer. Oncologist. 2010;15:845–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Epstein RJ. The CXCL12-CXCR4 chemotactic pathway as a target of adjuvant breast cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:901–9. [PubMed]
71. Batchelor TT, Sorensen AG, di Tomaso E, et al. AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:83–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
72. Batchelor TT, Duda DG, di Tomaso E, et al. Phase II study of cediranib, an oral pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2817–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Kamoun WS, Ley CD, Farrar CT, et al. Edema control by cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted kinase inhibitor, prolongs survival despite persistent brain tumor growth in mice. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2542–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. di Tomaso E, Snuderl M, Kamoun W, et al. Glioblastoma recurrence after cediranib therapy in patients: Lack of “rebound” revascularization as mode of escape. Cancer Res. 2011;71:19–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Shaked Y, Henke E, Roodhart JM, et al. Rapid chemotherapy-induced acute endothelial progenitor cell mobilization: implications for antiangiogenic drugs as chemosensitizing agents. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:263–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Shaked Y, Tang T, Woloszynek J, et al. Contribution of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to the acute mobilization of endothelial precursor cells by vascular disrupting agents. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7524–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
77. Chang CC, Lerman OZ, Thanik VD, et al. Dose-dependent effect of radiation on angiogenic and angiostatic CXC chemokine expression in human endothelial cells. Cytokine. 2009;48:295–302. [PubMed]
78. Maderna E, Salmaggi A, Calatozzolo C, Limido L, Pollo B. Nestin, PDGFRbeta, CXCL12 and VEGF in glioma patients: different profiles of (pro-angiogenic) molecule expression are related with tumor grade and may provide prognostic information. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6:1018–24. [PubMed]
79. Xu L, Duda DG, di Tomaso E, et al. Direct evidence that bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, up-regulates SDF1alpha, CXCR4, CXCL6, and neuropilin 1 in tumors from patients with rectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7905–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
80. Zhu AX, Sahani DV, Duda DG, et al. Efficacy, safety, and potential biomarkers of sunitinib monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3027–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Raut CP, Boucher Y, Duda DG, et al. Measurement of interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and circulating biomarkers in soft tissue sarcoma (STS): An exploratory phase II clinical and correlative study of sorafenib (SOR) in patients with refractory STS (NCI Protocol 6948) J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(S) (Suppl; abstr 10091)
82. De Clercq E. The bicyclam AMD3100 story. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:581–7. [PubMed]
83. Jain RK. Lessons from multidisciplinary translational trials on anti-angiogenic therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:309–16. [PubMed]
84. Tabatabai G, Frank B, Mohle R, Weller M, Wick W. Irradiation and hypoxia promote homing of haematopoietic progenitor cells towards gliomas by TGF-beta-dependent HIF-1alpha-mediated induction of CXCL12. Brain. 2006;129:2426–35. [PubMed]
85. Murakami J, Li TS, Ueda K, Tanaka T, Hamano K. Inhibition of accelerated tumor growth by blocking the recruitment of mobilized endothelial progenitor cells after chemotherapy. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:1685–92. [PubMed]
86. Ebos JM, Lee CR, Christensen JG, Mutsaers AJ, Kerbel RS. Multiple circulating proangiogenic factors induced by sunitinib malate are tumor-independent and correlate with antitumor efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:17069–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
87. Gerstner ER, Eichler AF, Plotkin S, et al. Phase I study of vatalanib (PTK787) in combination with standard radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol. 2010 doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0390-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
88. Lee CH, Kakinuma T, Wang J, et al. Sensitization of B16 tumor cells with a CXCR4 antagonist increases the efficacy of immunotherapy for established lung metastases. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:2592–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
89. Kerber M, Reiss Y, Wickersheim A, et al. Flt-1 signaling in macrophages promotes glioma growth in vivo. Cancer Res. 2008;68:7342–51. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...