• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosntdPLoS Neglected Tropical DiseasesView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. Mar 2011; 5(3): e967.
Published online Mar 1, 2011. doi:  10.1371/journal.pntd.0000967
PMCID: PMC3046970

Immunological and Viral Determinants of Dengue Severity in Hospitalized Adults in Ha Noi, Viet Nam

Rebeca Rico-Hesse, Editor

Abstract

Background

The relationships between the infecting dengue serotype, primary and secondary infection, viremia and dengue severity remain unclear. This cross-sectional study examined these interactions in adult patients hospitalized with dengue in Ha Noi.

Methods and Findings

158 patients were enrolled between September 16 and November 11, 2008. Quantitative RT-PCR, serology and NS1 detection were used to confirm dengue infection, determine the serotype and plasma viral RNA concentration, and categorize infections as primary or secondary. 130 (82%) were laboratory confirmed. Serology was consistent with primary and secondary infection in 34% and 61%, respectively. The infecting serotype was DENV-1 in 42 (32%), DENV-2 in 39 (30%) and unknown in 49 (38%). Secondary infection was more common in DENV-2 infections (79%) compared to DENV-1 (36%, p<0.001). The proportion that developed dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) was 32% for secondary infection compared to 18% for primary infection (p = 0.14), and 26% for DENV-1 compared to 28% for DENV-2. The time until NS1 and plasma viral RNA were undetectable was shorter for DENV-2 compared to DENV-1 (p≤0.001) and plasma viral RNA concentration on day 5 was higher for DENV-1 (p = 0.03). Plasma viral RNA concentration was higher in secondary infection on day 5 of illness (p = 0.046). We didn't find an association between plasma viral RNA concentration and clinical severity.

Conclusion

Dengue is emerging as a major public health problem in Ha Noi. DENV-1 and DENV-2 were the prevalent serotypes with similar numbers and clinical presentation. Secondary infection may be more common amongst DENV-2 than DENV-1 infections because DENV-2 infections resulted in lower plasma viral RNA concentrations and viral RNA concentrations were higher in secondary infection. The drivers of dengue emergence in northern Viet Nam need to be elucidated and public health measures instituted.

Author Summary

Dengue is estimated to affect 50 million people each year and can occur as explosive outbreaks that overwhelm health systems. Despite significant advances the available knowledge is not sufficient to predict the outcome of individual infections or the occurrence of epidemics. Studies from low dengue transmission settings are lacking but offer the potential to better understand the contribution of age, primary versus secondary infection and serotype because there are likely to be more adult and primary infection patients and fewer serotypes circulating compared to high transmission settings. This is the first reported study of clinical dengue in Ha Noi, the largest urban area of Northern Viet Nam. Records kept by the Preventive Medicine Center indicate that <2500 clinical dengue cases attended government health care facilities in Ha Noi each year from 1999 until 2007. Patients in Ha Noi were older than in high transmission settings, the contribution of primary infection to overt and severe illness was greater and associations between serotype, plasma viral RNA concentration and overt and severe illness were distinct. The dengue situation in Ha Noi provides an opportunity to further examine the roles of serotype and prior immunity in dengue severity and epidemic emergence.

Introduction

Dengue virus (DENV) infections range in severity from asymptomatic to a syndrome characterized by a haemorrhagic tendency and vascular permeability [1]. The events that precipitate endothelial cell dysfunction and vascular leak are incompletely understood. Numerous studies including several prospective cohorts [2], [3], [4] demonstrate that the risk of severe dengue is higher during a secondary infection with a new serotype in children [5], [6], [7]. Severe dengue has also been associated with high viral loads [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], prolonged viremia [13] and high NS1 antigen levels [12], [14]. At sub-neutralizing concentrations, dengue specific antibodies can enhance dengue virus infection of mononuclear phagocytes [15]. In addition, antibodies to pre-membrane protein appear to enhance infection of all serotypes, even when present at high concentration [16]. It has therefore been proposed that antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of viremia is a risk factor for severe dengue [1]. However, ADE may not fully account for severe dengue as several studies have found no association between severity and secondary infection in adults [7], [17], [18], [19], or severity and viral load [20], [21], [22], [23]. In one study dengue virus titers were higher prior to defervescence in patients with secondary infection [8] but most other studies have found that titers are either similar or higher in primary infection [10], [17], [20], [24]. Demonstration of a link between enhancing antibody levels, viral load and disease severity in humans also remains elusive.

The emerging picture is that multiple factors including prior immunity, viral load, age of the patient and infecting serotype and genotype may contribute to the severity of dengue infection [2], [3], [25], [26] but the nature of these interactions remains unclear. Dengue pathogenesis has largely been studied in dengue hyper-endemic regions where analysis is “confounded by a multiplicity of preexisting immunity patterns coupled with co-circulation of multiple serotypes” [3], [27]. Studies in low transmission settings, where few dengue serotypes circulate and primary infection in adults is common, potentially offer an opportunity to better identify factors associated with severity across serotype and immunity groups. We conducted a prospective study in Ha Noi, Viet Nam, to examine the association between primary and secondary infections, serotype, plasma viral RNA concentration, and the development of dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) in a low transmission setting.

Methods

Patient recruitment and clinical investigations

The protocol for this study was approved by the scientific and ethical committees at the National Hospital of Tropical Diseases and The Oxford University Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OXTREC). Patients provided written informed consent to participate in this study.

Patients were eligible for recruitment if they were admitted to the National Hospital of Tropical Diseases (NHTD) in Ha Noi, Viet Nam between September and November 2008 with a clinical diagnosis of dengue according to the WHO criteria [28]. These criteria were fever plus two or more of the following: headache; retro-orbital pain; myalgia/arthralgia; rash; bleeding or leukopenia. The study protocol included children but the number attending the National Hospital of Pediatrics (NHP) in Ha Noi during the study period was too low to warrant investigation. The NHTD is a 160 bed tertiary care center for adult patients with infectious diseases and also serves as a referral center for dengue in Northern Viet Nam. The NHP is the coordinating center for pediatric care in the country, receives patients from all Northern provinces and sees on average 40,000 in-patients and 350,000 out-patients per year.

Patients were examined daily during hospitalization by a dedicated team of physicians with experience in dengue diagnosis and treatment. Signs and symptoms of hemorrhage, capillary permeability and shock along with other relevant clinical data were prospectively recorded using standardized case record forms. Ultrasound of the chest and abdomen was performed at study enrolment and additionally when clinically indicated. Full blood counts were performed daily for at least 6 days during admission, as well as at discharge and approximately 10 days after discharge. Other investigations and clinical management were at the discretion of the attending physicians. CRFs and laboratory results were reviewed to identify patients that fulfilled the WHO criteria for dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), i.e. plasma leakage, plus thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic signs [28]. Plasma leakage was said to be evident if pleural effusion and/or ascites were detected by ultrasound, or if a haematocrit during admission was ≥20% higher than at follow-up. If the patient did not attend follow-up, the average of follow-up values for males (n = 60, average  = 44) or females (n = 56, average  = 38) was used. This compares to a normal haematocrit value of 38% with a range of 35–41% set by the Ministry of Health of Viet Nam. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count less than 100,000/mm3.

Dengue Diagnostics

An in-house IgM & IgG capture ELISA using antigens from DENV 1-4 and monoclonal antibodies provided by Venture Technologies (Sarawak, Malaysia) was performed as previously described [29]. A sample was considered IgM or IgG positive if the units were at least 6 times higher than the negative control sera. An internally controlled, serotype-specific, real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay [30] was used to identify the infecting serotype and determine viral RNA concentrations expressed as cDNA equivalents/ml of plasma. The sequences of the dengue serotype-specific primers and probes have been published previously [30]. They amplify and detect parts of the NS5 coding region that were first identified by Laue et al as being highly conserved within each dengue serotype [31]. The assay limit of detection was 10 cDNA equivalents per reaction. Dengue NS1 antigen was detected using a commercial ELISA (BIO-RAD Platelia™ Dengue NS1 Ag) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A diagnosis of confirmed dengue was made using a previously described reference algorithm [32] that has been adapted to include NS1 ELISA and remove the indirect recombinant membrane protein ELISA, which was not used in this study (Figure S1). Using this algorithm a patient is considered to have confirmed dengue if either RT-PCR or NS1 ELISA is positive, if there is an increase in the level of IgM detected by ELISA or an IgG ELISA conversion in the presence of a positive IgM ELISA. Serology was considered to be consistent with primary dengue infection if on or after day 6 of illness IgM levels were at least 1.78 times higher than IgG levels [33], or with secondary infection if IgM levels were less than 1.2 times higher than IgG levels.

Data analysis

Illness day was calculated from the first date that the patient recalled having fever, which was assigned as day 1. Proportions were compared using odds ratios and Chi-Square or Fishers exact test when any expected cell count was less than 5. Continuous variables were presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) and compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney tests. Data for study patients was compared to records kept by the Ha Noi Preventive Medicine Center (Ha Noi PMC), which includes age, gender, province and district of people attending government health care facilities with a clinical diagnosis of dengue by month and year.

We modelled dengue severity as depending on serological definition of prior infection/immunity and infecting serotype (and a potential interaction) using simple and multiple logistic regression analyses. The probability of a positive NS1 result and the log-10 plasma viral RNA measurements on day 5 of illness (i.e. the median illness day when patients were admitted) were modelled using logistic and linear regression models, respectively, depending on serological definition of prior infection, infecting serotype and dengue severity. In a sensitivity analysis, the model was additionally adjusted for age and gender. The time from illness onset to the first undetectable NS1 and viral RNA measurement, respectively, were modelled using Weibull accelerated failure time regression models for interval censored data, i.e. patients were treated as reaching undetectable levels in the interval between their last positive and their first undetectable measurement and patients for whom the first measurement was undetectable were treated as first reaching undetectable levels between illness day 1 and the day of this first measurement.

Analyses were performed with the statistical software R version 2.9.1 [34] and SPSS for Windows, Rel. 14.0.0.245, 2005 (SPSS Inc. Chicago IL.).

Results

Characteristics of patients admitted with confirmed dengue

158 of 206 eligible patients consented and enrolled in an 8 week period commencing on September 16 2008. During this time approximately 1240 clinical dengue cases attended government health care facilities in Ha Noi out of a total of 2371 for the whole of 2008 of which 975 (41%) were admitted to NHTD. 139 patients were from Ha Noi province, 11 were from 4 neighboring provinces and 6 were from more distant provinces, the farthest being Nhge An, Son La and Quang Ninh which are more than 100 km from Ha Noi. None of the patients were from provinces north of Ha Noi. Laboratory diagnosis of dengue was made for 130 patients. A further 18 with probable dengue were not included in this analysis as these were recruited significantly later in their illness and 61% had already defervesced. 26% of all enrolled patients and 23% of those with confirmed dengue had been transferred from another hospital. The age and gender distribution of confirmed dengue patients (Table 1) were similar to that for dengue cases attending any government health care facility in Ha Noi in 2008 (median age 23 years, IQR 18–31, 52% male). The geographic distribution was also similar to that for all reported cases in Ha Noi (data not shown). Amongst confirmed cases serology was indicative of secondary infection in 61% and of primary infection in 34% (Table 1). The infecting serotype could be defined by real-time-RT-PCR for 81 patients of which 52% had DENV-1 and 48% had DENV-2 (Table 1). Viral RNA could not be detected by RT-PCR in 49 confirmed dengue patients. The median admission day for these patients was 1 day later than for those with virus RNA detectable by RT-PCR (Table 1). The E genes of 9 DENV-2 (GenBank: GU908512- GU908520) and 20 DENV-1 (GenBank: HQ591537-HQ591556) viruses were sequenced and belong phylogenetically to the Asian 1 genotype and Genotype I, respectively (unpublished findings). Secondary infection was significantly more common in DENV-2 patients (79%) compared to DENV-1 patients (36%, p<0.001). Age, sex and course of illness were similar across serotype and serology subgroups (Table 1). Most patients (91, 70%) were classified as dengue fever (DF) and 36 (28%) developed DHF, of which 5 were classified as grade I, 30 as grade II and 1 as grade III. All patients were well at discharge except one patient who was transferred to the surgical hospital.

Table 1
Characteristics of confirmed cases categorized by prior immunity and serotype.

Characteristics of patients with DHF

In patients with DHF platelet counts fell to their lowest levels and haematocrits increased by the greatest percentage over baseline on days 5–7 (Figure 1). DHF rates were similar for DENV-1 and DENV-2 patients (Table 1). There was a non-significant trend of higher DHF rates in patients with secondary compared to primary infection (Odds Ratio 1.96, 95% CI 0.80 – 4.85, p = 0.14). Results were consistent when including both serotype and serological definition of primary versus secondary infection in a logistic model and after adjusting for age and sex (data not shown), and there was no evidence of an interaction between serotype and primary/secondary infection status in the development of DHF (Likelihood ratio p = 0.48).

Figure 1
Daily platelet and haematocrit measurements in DF and DHF patients.

Association between serotype, serology and NS1

The proportion NS1 positive on day 5 of illness was significantly higher for DENV-1 compared to DENV-2 patients and the time to undetectable NS1 was shorter for DENV-2 (Table 2, Figure 2). The proportion NS1 positive on day 5 was similar for patients with primary and secondary infection but the time to undetectable was shorter for secondary infection. There was no evidence of an interaction between serotype and primary/secondary infection status (Likelihood ratio  = 0.24) and effects were consistent when the analysis was additionally adjusted for age and gender. There was also no evidence of any association between NS1 and DHF (Table 2).

Figure 2
NS1 measurements in DF and DHF patients stratified by serotype and primary versus secondary infection.
Table 2
Multiple regression models for prediction of NS1 detection.

Association between serotype, serology and plasma viral RNA concentration

Log10 viral RNA concentration in plasma on day 5 was estimated to be 0.96 lower for DENV-2 than for DENV-1 patients and the time taken until viral RNA was undetectable in plasma was estimated to be 0.89 times shorter for DENV-2 (Table 3, Figure 3). Plasma viral RNA concentration on day 5 was significantly higher in patients with secondary infection, but the time taken until viral RNA was undetectable in plasma was not significantly different. Results were consistent after adjusting for age and sex (data not shown) and likelihood ratio tests showed no evidence of interaction between serotype and primary/secondary infection status for either viral RNA concentration on day 5 (p = 0.96) or time taken until viral RNA was undetectable (p = 0.85). We couldn't establish a clear association between DHF and plasma viral RNA concentration on day 5 or time taken until viral RNA was undetectable in plasma.

Figure 3
Viral RNA concentration in DF and DHF patients stratified by serotype and primary versus secondary infection.
Table 3
Multiple regression models for prediction of plasma log10 viral RNA concentration and time to undetectable.

Discussion

Hospitalized dengue patients in Ha Noi in 2008 were predominantly adults with high rates of primary infection compared to Southern Vietnam [35] and other hyper-endemic regions [36], [37]. DENV-1 and DENV-2 were the only serotypes identified, consistent with national dengue surveillance data for Ha Noi (Le Quynh Mai, personal communication), whereas in Southern Viet Nam all serotypes were detected during clinical dengue surveillance in 2008 but DENV-1 was predominant [38]. Overall case numbers and clinical presentation were similar for DENV-1 and DENV-2. However, while primary infection predominated amongst DENV-1 patients suggesting that a substantial proportion of adults are dengue naïve, secondary infection predominated in DENV-2. This suggests that primary DENV-2 infections may be less likely to present clinically.

A limitation of this study is that patients were recruited from only one hospital in Hanoi. However, the patients studied represented ~12% of dengue cases seeking treatment for dengue at government health care centers in Ha Noi during the study period and had similar epidemiology. We did not include children as originally intended because only 5 were admitted to the National Hospital of Pediatrics with clinically suspected dengue while the study was being conducted. This may be expected if transmission is low such that secondary infections mainly occur in adulthood. However it is not clear why children with primary infection do not present given that 34% of adult patients had primary infection. Others report that DHF rates during primary infection are higher for adults and suggest that primary infection is more severe in adults [39]. Patients that admitted late were not precluded from this study in order to obtain a comprehensive description of clinical dengue, however this limited our ability to detect viral RNA in plasma and determine peak concentrations. The infecting serotype was unknown for 38% of confirmed dengue patients most of whom admitted 5 to 6 days after illness onset, and by day 6 viral RNA could be detected in only 39 of 100 confirmed patients tested. We suspect that DENV-2 will be the predominant infecting serotype in this group because viral RNA clearance from plasma was faster for DENV-2 than for DENV-1 patients in our study.

Similar to the findings of this study, records kept since 1988 indicate that Dengue case numbers have been low in Ha Noi and that dengue has predominated in adults (Horby P. et al, in preparation). This may not reflect transmission because the proportion of infections that present clinically can be low and the proportion and age-distribution depends on the prevalent serotypes and the age-associated prevalence of past infection with each serotype [3], [40], [41]. However, the age of clinical dengue cases generally increases with decreasing transmission intensity [42], and the epidemiology of hospitalized dengue in this study is similar to that in Singapore where transmission has decreased due to effective vector control but the age and proportion of cases with primary dengue has increased, presumably because adults are more prone to present clinically upon primary infection [40].

Others have reported that primary DENV-2 infections are rarely symptomatic [6], [36], [37], [43], [44]. The reason for this has not been established but our data shows that viral RNA concentration is low and NS1 detection brief in the plasma of DENV-2 compared to DENV-1 patients, factors that could be considered important in disease pathogenesis leading to severe dengue. Furthermore, the relatively high prevalence of secondary DENV-2 coincided with higher plasma viral RNA concentrations in secondary infection. It is important to note that the DENV-2 viruses sequenced in this study belonged to the Asian I genotype, which has been associated with more severe disease compared to the American genotype [26] and with higher plasma viral RNA concentrations compared to Asian/American genotype [38]. While the results suggest that primary infection with DENV-1 is more likely to lead to clinically overt disease than with DENV-2, we can not exclude the possibility that secondary infection contributes to overt DENV-1 or the possibility that DENV-2 infections are more likely to be enhanced than DENV-1 infections. The latter has been suggested elsewhere [3] and is supported by several studies showing that in children with secondary infection DHF is more common for DENV-2 compared to DENV-1 [4], [36]. DHF was approximately twice as common in secondary compared to primary infection in our cohort, but the number of patients with DHF was small and this did not reach statistical significance or permit analysis within each serotype. However, in a study of hospitalized patients in Thailand the association between secondary infection and DHF was greater for DENV-2 than DENV-1 because DHF was less common in DENV-2 compared to DENV-1 during primary infection [34]. As in our study, this suggests that primary DENV-2 infections may be less virulent than DENV-1. As discussed above, we suspect that DENV-2 would have been the predominant infecting serotype amongst confirmed dengue patients in which the infecting serotype was unknown. NS1 measurements and prior infection status were similar for serotype-unknown and DENV-2 patients and distinct from DENV-1 patients providing further indication that DENV-1 may be distinct in terms of virulence during primary infection.

There was a non-significant trend of increased DHF in secondary infection, but 22% of DHF cases had primary infection. Thus secondary infection was not essential for DHF in this cohort. Secondary infection was associated with higher viral RNA concentration in plasma on day 5 of illness, but we did not find an association between viral RNA concentration and DHF. Interpretation of the effect of viral RNA concentration on DHF in our patients is limited by the relatively low proportion that developed DHF and perhaps also the high proportion that presented after day 3 of illness. Several of the studies that find an association between viremia and DHF recruit children within the first 3 days of illness and suggest that DHF is positively associated with peak viremia [8], [9], [11]. It remains controversial whether virus clearance times also differ. In one study clearance of infectious virus determined by mosquito inoculation was faster in children with DHF compared to DF [8] but studies of adults with DENV-2 or DENV-3 infection [10], [13] and children with DENV-2 infection [24] have found longer times to virus RNA or virus-RNA containing immune complex clearance amongst those with DHF[10], [13]. It is also possible that we did not detect an association between DHF and plasma viral RNA concentration because a relatively high proportion of our patients had primary DENV-1 and studies where DHF has been associated with viremia rarely include primary DENV-1 [9], [10], [11], [13], [14], [24] or reported that there was no association in patients with primary DENV-1 [8]. The contribution of plasma viral RNA concentration to the development of DHF may be not be discernable in primary DENV-1 because plasma viral RNA concentration is generally high in DENV-1, but this would imply that high viral RNA concentration alone is not sufficient to cause DHF.

The time until NS1 was undetectable was longer for DENV-1 compared to DENV-2, similar to findings of an earlier study in Southern Viet Nam [32]. We previously suggested that this reflected a predominance of primary infection in DENV-1 and that NS1 clearance is faster in secondary infection due to sequestration by IgG [32], [45]. In the current study there were sufficient primary cases for a stratified analysis, which demonstrated that serotype is the main determinant of the sensitivity of NS1 tests, and this should be considered when interpreting NS1-based diagnostics.

In conclusion our results indicate an association between secondary infection and clinically overt DENV-2 infection. Higher plasma viral RNA concentration in secondary infection may underlie the association between secondary infection and overt DENV-2. We could not detect an association between DHF and secondary infection or plasma viral RNA concentration but this may be due to the relatively high proportion of patients with primary DENV-1, a situation that may change if dengue emerges and the proportion and age of the population that is dengue naïve declines.

The number of countries affected by dengue has increased six-fold in the last 30 years with potential for further spread through temperate, subtropical and tropical areas [46]. The Ha Noi Preventive Medicine Centre reported a 7-fold increase in the number of clinical dengue cases from 2008 to 2009 and this unforeseen epidemic overwhelmed the health system. A similar problem is faced in regions where dengue has been endemic for decades due to large multi-annual peaks in severe disease incidence [47]. Current understanding of the drivers of dengue epidemics is inadequate to predict their occurrence and inform public health prevention and preparedness measures. The dengue situation in Ha Noi provides an opportunity to further examine the roles of serotype infection sequence and prior immunity in dengue severity and emergence.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Dengue lab algorithm

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients for agreeing to participate in the study. We thank the Ministry of Health of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam and the staff of the National Hospital of Tropical diseases for their continued support for our work and for their dedication to high quality research into infectious diseases in Viet Nam. We particularly acknowledge the doctors and nurses on the dengue ward for their hard work in patient care. We thank Cuong Hoang Quoc for collating dengue surveillance data from the Ha Noi Preventive Medicine Center.

Footnotes

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust United Kingdom (grant 077078/Z/05/Z). At the time of this study, WT and HW were supported by the South East Asian Clinical Infectious Disease Network (N01- A0-50042). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Halstead SB. Pathogenesis of dengue: challenges to molecular biology. Science. 1988;239:476–481. [PubMed]
2. Sangkawibha N, Rojanasuphot S, Ahandrik S, Viriyapongse S, Jatanasen S, et al. Risk factors in dengue shock syndrome: a prospective epidemiologic study in Rayong, Thailand. I. The 1980 outbreak. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;120:653–669. [PubMed]
3. Burke DS, Nisalak A, Johnson DE, Scott RM. A prospective study of dengue infections in Bangkok. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;38:172–180. [PubMed]
4. Thein S, Aung MM, Shwe TN, Aye M, Zaw A, et al. Risk factors in dengue shock syndrome. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;56:566–572. [PubMed]
5. Halstead SB, Udomsakdi S, Simasthien P, Singharaj P, Sukhavachana P, et al. Observations related to pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. I. Experience with classification of dengue viruses. Yale J Biol Med. 1970;42:261–275. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Guzman MG, Kouri G, Valdes L, Bravo J, Alvarez M, et al. Epidemiologic studies on Dengue in Santiago de Cuba, 1997. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:793–799; discussion 804. [PubMed]
7. Wichmann O, Hongsiriwon S, Bowonwatanuwong C, Chotivanich K, Sukthana Y, et al. Risk factors and clinical features associated with severe dengue infection in adults and children during the 2001 epidemic in Chonburi, Thailand. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9:1022–1029. [PubMed]
8. Vaughn DW, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, Innis BL, Nimmannitya S, et al. Dengue viremia titer, antibody response pattern, and virus serotype correlate with disease severity. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:2–9. [PubMed]
9. Libraty DH, Endy TP, Houng HS, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, et al. Differing influences of virus burden and immune activation on disease severity in secondary dengue-3 virus infections. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:1213–1221. [PubMed]
10. Wang WK, Chao DY, Kao CL, Wu HC, Liu YC, et al. High levels of plasma dengue viral load during defervescence in patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever: implications for pathogenesis. Virology. 2003;305:330–338. [PubMed]
11. Endy TP, Nisalak A, Chunsuttitwat S, Vaughn DW, Green S, et al. Relationship of preexisting dengue virus (DV) neutralizing antibody levels to viremia and severity of disease in a prospective cohort study of DV infection in Thailand. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:990–1000. [PubMed]
12. Avirutnan P, Punyadee N, Noisakran S, Komoltri C, Thiemmeca S, et al. Vascular leakage in severe dengue virus infections: a potential role for the nonstructural viral protein NS1 and complement. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:1078–1088. [PubMed]
13. Wang WK, Chen HL, Yang CF, Hsieh SC, Juan CC, et al. Slower rates of clearance of viral load and virus-containing immune complexes in patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1023–1030. [PubMed]
14. Libraty DH, Young PR, Pickering D, Endy TP, Kalayanarooj S, et al. High circulating levels of the dengue virus nonstructural protein NS1 early in dengue illness correlate with the development of dengue hemorrhagic fever. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:1165–1168. [PubMed]
15. Halstead SB, O'Rourke EJ. Dengue viruses and mononuclear phagocytes. I. Infection enhancement by non-neutralizing antibody. J Exp Med. 1977;146:201–217. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Dejnirattisai W, Jumnainsong A, Onsirisakul N, Fitton P, Vasanawathana S, et al. Cross-reacting antibodies enhance dengue virus infection in humans. Science. 2010;328:745–748. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Kuberski T, Rosen L, Reed D, Mataika J. Clinical and laboratory observations on patients with primary and secondary dengue type 1 infections with hemorrhagic manifestations in Fiji. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1977;26:775–783. [PubMed]
18. Harris E, Videa E, Perez L, Sandoval E, Tellez Y, et al. Clinical, epidemiologic, and virologic features of dengue in the 1998 epidemic in Nicaragua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;63:5–11. [PubMed]
19. Guilarde AO, Turchi MD, Siqueira JB, Jr, Feres VC, Rocha B, et al. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever among adults: clinical outcomes related to viremia, serotypes, and antibody response. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:817–824. [PubMed]
20. Gubler DJ, Suharyono W, Tan R, Abidin M, Sie A. Viraemia in patients with naturally acquired dengue infection. Bull World Health Organ. 1981;59:623–630. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Sudiro TM, Zivny J, Ishiko H, Green S, Vaughn DW, et al. Analysis of plasma viral RNA levels during acute dengue virus infection using quantitative competitor reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. J Med Virol. 2001;63:29–34. [PubMed]
22. Chen RF, Liu JW, Yeh WT, Wang L, Chang JC, et al. Altered T helper 1 reaction but not increase of virus load in patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005;44:43–50. [PubMed]
23. Simmons CP, Chau TN, Thuy TT, Tuan NM, Hoang DM, et al. Maternal antibody and viral factors in the pathogenesis of dengue virus in infants. J Infect Dis. 2007;196:416–424. [PubMed]
24. Murgue B, Roche C, Chungue E, Deparis X. Prospective study of the duration and magnitude of viraemia in children hospitalised during the 1996-1997 dengue-2 outbreak in French Polynesia. J Med Virol. 2000;60:432–438. [PubMed]
25. Guzman MG, Kouri G. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever in the Americas: lessons and challenges. J Clin Virol. 2003;27:1–13. [PubMed]
26. Rico-Hesse R, Harrison LM, Salas RA, Tovar D, Nisalak A, et al. Origins of dengue type 2 viruses associated with increased pathogenicity in the Americas. Virology. 1997;230:244–251. [PubMed]
27. Alvarez M, Rodriguez-Roche R, Bernardo L, Vazquez S, Morier L, et al. Dengue hemorrhagic Fever caused by sequential dengue 1-3 virus infections over a long time interval: Havana epidemic, 2001-2002. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:1113–1117. [PubMed]
28. WHO. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1997. 2 ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997. Dengue haemorrhagic fever: diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. 2nd edition.
29. Cardosa MJ, Wang SM, Sum MS, Tio PH. Antibodies against prM protein distinguish between previous infection with dengue and Japanese encephalitis viruses. BMC Microbiol. 2002;2:9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Simmons CP, Popper S, Dolocek C, Chau TN, Griffiths M, et al. Patterns of host genome-wide gene transcript abundance in the peripheral blood of patients with acute dengue hemorrhagic fever. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:1097–1107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Laue T, Emmerich P, Schmitz H. Detection of dengue virus RNA in patients after primary or secondary dengue infection by using the TaqMan automated amplification system. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2543–2547. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Hang VT, Nguyet NM, Trung DT, Tricou V, Yoksan S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of NS1 ELISA and lateral flow rapid tests for dengue sensitivity, specificity and relationship to viraemia and antibody responses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e360. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Guzman MG, Kouri G. Dengue diagnosis, advances and challenges. Int J Infect Dis. 2004;8:69–80. [PubMed]
34. R DCTf A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
35. Tricou V, Minh NN, Van TP, Lee SJ, Farrar J, et al. A randomized controlled trial of chloroquine for the treatment of dengue in vietnamese adults. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e785. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Nisalak A, Endy TP, Nimmannitya S, Kalayanarooj S, Thisayakorn U, et al. Serotype-specific dengue virus circulation and dengue disease in Bangkok, Thailand from 1973 to 1999. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:191–202. [PubMed]
37. Anantapreecha S, Chanama S, An A, Naemkhunthot S, Sa-Ngasang A, et al. Serological and virological features of dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in Thailand from 1999 to 2002. Epidemiol Infect. 2005;133:503–507. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Vu TT, Holmes EC, Duong V, Nguyen TQ, Tran TH, et al. Emergence of the Asian 1 genotype of dengue virus serotype 2 in viet nam: in vivo fitness advantage and lineage replacement in South-East Asia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e757. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Egger JR, Coleman PG. Age and clinical dengue illness. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:924–925. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Egger JR, Ooi EE, Kelly DW, Woolhouse ME, Davies CR, et al. Reconstructing historical changes in the force of infection of dengue fever in Singapore: implications for surveillance and control. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:187–196. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Honorio NA, Nogueira RM, Codeco CT, Carvalho MS, Cruz OG, et al. Spatial evaluation and modeling of Dengue seroprevalence and vector density in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e545. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Thammapalo S, Nagao Y, Sakamoto W, Saengtharatip S, Tsujitani M, et al. Relationship between transmission intensity and incidence of dengue hemorrhagic fever in Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e263. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Vaughn DW. Invited commentary: Dengue lessons from Cuba. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:800–803. [PubMed]
44. Balmaseda A, Hammond SN, Perez L, Tellez Y, Saborio SI, et al. Serotype-specific differences in clinical manifestations of dengue. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:449–456. [PubMed]
45. Kumarasamy V, Wahab AH, Chua SK, Hassan Z, Chem YK, et al. Evaluation of a commercial dengue NS1 antigen-capture ELISA for laboratory diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection. J Virol Methods. 2007;140:75–79. [PubMed]
46. Mackenzie JS, Gubler DJ, Petersen LR. Emerging flaviviruses: the spread and resurgence of Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and dengue viruses. Nat Med. 2004;10:S98–109. [PubMed]
47. Cummings DA, Irizarry RA, Huang NE, Endy TP, Nisalak A, et al. Travelling waves in the occurrence of dengue haemorrhagic fever in Thailand. Nature. 2004;427:344–347. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...