Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2011; 6(2): e14739.
Published online 2011 Feb 28. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0014739
PMCID: PMC3046141

Broad Epigenetic Signature of Maternal Care in the Brain of Adult Rats

Angela Sirigu, Editor



Maternal care is associated with long-term effects on behavior and epigenetic programming of the NR3C1 (GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTOR) gene in the hippocampus of both rats and humans. In the rat, these effects are reversed by cross-fostering, demonstrating that they are defined by epigenetic rather than genetic processes. However, epigenetic changes at a single gene promoter are unlikely to account for the range of outcomes and the persistent change in expression of hundreds of additional genes in adult rats in response to differences in maternal care.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We examine here using high-density oligonucleotide array the state of DNA methylation, histone acetylation and gene expression in a 7 million base pair region of chromosome 18 containing the NR3C1 gene in the hippocampus of adult rats. Natural variations in maternal care are associated with coordinate epigenetic changes spanning over a hundred kilobase pairs. The adult offspring of high compared to low maternal care mothers show epigenetic changes in promoters, exons, and gene ends associated with higher transcriptional activity across many genes within the locus examined. Other genes in this region remain unchanged, indicating a clustered yet specific and patterned response. Interestingly, the chromosomal region containing the protocadherin-α, -β, and (Pcdh) gene families implicated in synaptogenesis show the highest differential response to maternal care.


The results suggest for the first time that the epigenetic response to maternal care is coordinated in clusters across broad genomic areas. The data indicate that the epigenetic response to maternal care involves not only single candidate gene promoters but includes transcriptional and intragenic sequences, as well as those residing distantly from transcription start sites. These epigenetic and transcriptional profiles constitute the first tiling microarray data set exploring the relationship between epigenetic modifications and RNA expression in both protein coding and non-coding regions across a chromosomal locus in the mammalian brain.


The quality of parental care has a broad impact on mental health, including the risk for psychopathology [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Studies in the rat directly link the maternal care environment to long-term effects on neural systems that regulate stress [6], [7] emotional function[8], [9], learning and memory [10], [11], [12] and neuroplasticity [10], [13], [14], [15]. Naturally occurring variations in maternal care in the first week of life in rats are associated with changes in brain and behavior that persist until adulthood [16]. These effects are reversed by cross-fostering, [7], [9] demonstrating a causal link between maternal care and gene expression programming.

In rats and humans, there is evidence that changes in gene expression as a function of early care are at least partly regulated by epigenetic mechanisms [6], [17], [18]. In rats, variations in maternal care in the first week of life are associated with alterations in DNA methylation and H3K9 acetylation of the NR3C1 promoter region, and gene expression of the GR17 splice variant of the NR3C1 gene in the hippocampus of adult offspring [6]. There is evidence that the expression of hundreds of additional genes in adult rats changes in response to differences in maternal care [19]. Some of these changes in gene expression can be reversed by pharmacological alterations of chromatin structure by the histone deacetylase inhibitor Trichostatin A (TSA) and the methyl donor L-methionine [19], [20]. The fact that the methyl donor L-methionine inhibits some of the genes influenced by maternal behavior supports the involvement of either DNA or histone methylation. The fact that a large number of genes are responsive to the effects of TSA and L-methionine implies that the epigenetic regulation of gene expression as a function of maternal care may be extensive. In the present study, we test this hypothesis by examining epigenetic and transcriptional changes associated with naturally occurring differences in maternal care.

We obtained hippocampal samples from the adult offspring of rat mothers that differed in the frequency of pup licking/grooming in the first week of life (i.e. High vs Low LG adult offspring) and performed an analysis of DNA methylation, H3K9 acetylation and gene expression of a contiguous 7 million base pair region of rat chromosome 18 containing the NR3C1 gene at 100 bp spacing. To our knowledge, these epigenetic and transcriptional profiles constitute the first tiling microarray data set exploring the relationship between epigenetic modifications and RNA expression in both protein coding and non-coding regions across a chromosomal locus in the mammalian brain.


Validation of microarray results

To validate signals observed on our microarray and differences between High and Low LG offspring, we quantified changes in H3K9 acetylation, DNA methylation, and transcription. H3K9 acetylation differences in 7 regions (Fig. 1a) and DNA methylation differences in 12 regions (Fig. 1b) were validated by quantitative PCR (qChIP – see Methods for details; [21]). Levels of DNA methylation validated by qChIP correlated significantly with levels of enrichment detected by microarray (R = 0.38, P = 0.0029 by Pearson's correlation; Fig. S1). DNA methylation differences were further confirmed for four genes by sequencing sodium bisulfite converted DNA (Fig. S2). False positives due to DNA polymorphism rather than differential methylation were ruled out for 12 regions (those validated by qChIP above) via DNA sequencing (data not shown). Of nine genes showing significant differences in gene expression between High and Low LG offspring, all were significantly more expressed among High LG offspring (Fig. 1c).

Figure 1
Microarray validation.

As a further method of validating our microarrays, we compared our average observed levels of transcriptional and epigenetic signals to previously described signals within specific gene elements across the entire locus profiled. To do so, we examined the absolute levels of transcription, histone acetylation and DNA methylation for all subjects combined (Fig. S3), and compared them to previously published relationships between levels of gene expression, DNA methylation, and histone acetylation across 5′ regulatory regions, exons, and introns. First, previous studies have indicated that much of the genome is actively transcribed [22] but that levels of transcription are generally higher within annotated exons relative to other regions. As expected, inside exons we observed significantly higher transcription than the overall levels of transcription throughout all regions in the locus (P = 1.47×10−155 by Student's T-test, P = 0 by Wilcoxon Rank Sum test). In contrast, we observed levels of transcription just upstream of genes (−1800 bp to transcription start site) and in intronic regions that were indistinguishable from the baseline. These data indicate that the signals observed by our microarray accurately detect known transcribed regions. Second, many previous studies in a variety of cell types have shown that active transcription is associated with low levels of DNA methylation in the 5′ ends of genes [23]. CpG islands also show lower than average levels of DNA methylation compared to other genomic regions [24]. As expected, we observed lower DNA methylation levels in 5′ gene ends (P = 1.34×10−78 by Wilcoxon Rank Sum test) and within CpG islands (P = 7.15×10−200 by Wilcoxon Rank Sum test) than the overall levels of methylation across the locus (Fig. S3b–c). Third, actively transcribed genes have been associated with reduced nucleosome occupancy near transcription start sites [25], [26], [27]. We similarly found lower H3K9 acetylation levels in 5′ gene ends (P = 9.22×10−47 by Wilcoxon Rank Sum test; Fig. S3b). Computational prediction of nucleosome density from DNA sequence [28] showed a significant correlation between nucleosome position and H3K9 acetylation levels observed by microarray (R = 0.2, P = 2.2×10−16 by Pearson's correlation; Fig. S4). These observations of lower absolute levels of DNA methylation with CpG islands and higher levels of transcription within exons associated with lower DNA methylation and H3K9 acetylation levels in 5′ gene ends indicate that our epigenetic and transcription microarray results conform to previously published data in other genomic loci.

The pattern of the epigenetic and transcriptional response to maternal care across the NR3C1 gene locus

A “large-scale” view of the entire locus as a whole revealed a widespread but patterned response to maternal care among High and Low LG adult offspring (High – Low; Fig. 2). We observed peaks and valleys of H3K9 acetylation and DNA methylation levels throughout a number of regions, suggesting a widespread epigenomic response to variations in maternal care. The response to maternal care is not evenly distributed, with many sequences showing little or no response and clustered regions showing enhanced responses. In total, we found significant differential DNA methylation in 1413 probes and significant differences in H3K9 acetylation in 713 probes out of 44000 probes covering the region. Variations in epigenetic signaling across the locus appear within annotated genic regions (e.g., Fig. 2 – see blue highlight), and also in regions where no gene is annotated (e.g., Fig. 2 – see orange highlight). Transcriptional differences are similarly widespread (Fig. 2 – see expression track). These results suggest that some but not all regions are associated with changes in epigenetic signaling associated with differences in maternal care, with broad epigenetic changes apparent within both genic and inter-genic areas.

Figure 2
The pattern of H3K9 acetylation, DNA methylation, and gene expression among High and Low LG adult offspring across ∼7MB of chromosome 18.

Localization of broad epigenetic changes to gene regulatory and transcriptional elements

To index broad epigenetic changes observed across the locus, we defined a Regional Difference in DNA methylation and a Regional Difference H3K9 acetylation (RDme and RDac, respectively) as a statistically significant difference between High LG and Low LG offspring of at least 1000 bp containing at least one statistically significant probe per 1000 bp (see Methods S1 for details). Across the entire locus, we identified 723 RDme of which 373 are significantly hypermethylated and 350 are hypomethylated in High relative to Low LG offspring. We similarly identified 471 RDac of which 204 are hyperacetylated and 267 are hypoacetylated. We found that these broad epigenetic differences associated with maternal care are significantly co-localized within the locus, and were positively correlated at distances over 100 Kb (Fig. 3a). The data suggest that clustering of differentially methylated and acetylated regions is not exclusive to pathological responses under extreme selection as is the case in cancer but includes epigenetic responses to natural variations in maternal care, and may be characteristic of naturally occurring epigenetic responses.

Figure 3
Regional variations in differences in histone acetylation, DNA methyation and gene expression between High and Low LG adult offspring.

We next examined the localization of broad differences in H3K9 acetylation, DNA methylation (i.e., RDac and RDme) and transcription with respect to the physical anatomy of genes within the locus. Gene regulatory elements, including transcription start sites, 5′ and 3′ gene ends, and CpG islands are typical regions of interest in studies of gene regulation by epigenetic mechanisms. We found no evidence of a relationship between CpG density and the presence of RDme (P = 0.53 by Wilcoxon rank sum test), indicating there is no difference between CpG islands and other regions with respect to the presence of RDme. RDme/ac overlapped the transcription start sites of some but not all genes, indicating specificity in epigenetic signaling within the locus. Seventy-seven transcription start sites in 69 genes contain RDme while 127 transcript start sites in 94 genes do not contain RDme. Similarly, 37 transcription start sites in 32 genes contain RDac while 167 transcription start sites in 131 genes do not contain RDac. There was a significant enrichment of hyperacetylated RDac (regions in which the high maternal care group has higher acetylation levels) inside exons, particularly the first and last exons (P = 0.0014 and P = 0.0088, respectively; permutation test), and a significant depletion of hypoacetylated RDac inside the first and last exons (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.19, respectively; permutation test). RDac are relatively depleted in the 5′ and 3′ ends of genes (P = 0.02 by permutation test), likely reflecting the aforementioned depletion of nucleosomes at these sites in actively transcribed genes. In contrast, RDme co-localize in regulatory elements, particularly in the 5′ and 3′ ends of genes (P = 0.0032 by permutation test). Hypermethylated RDme (regions that are more methylated in the high maternal group than in the low maternal care group) are significantly enriched inside both the first and last exons of genes (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.004, respectively; permutation test) whereas hypomethylated RDme are significantly depleted inside the first exon (P = 0.0022; permutation test; Fig. 3b – red for hypermethylated RDme and blue for hypomethylated RDme). In addition, we observed an enrichment of hypomethylated RDme upstream of the TSS (P = 0.02; Fig. 3b – blue line). These data showing an enrichment of hyperacetylated RDac and hypermethylated RDme within exons and an enrichment of hypomethylated RDme in regulatory elements are consistent with previous data in cancer cells showing high exonic H3K9 acetylation [25], [26], [27] and DNA methylation [29] and low promoter DNA methylation associated with actively transcribed genes.

Next, we performed an analysis of probe-level changes in epigenetic and transcriptional signaling as an alternative method to compare to previous studies in cancer. We compared probe-level differences in H3K9 acetylation, DNA methylation, and RNA transcription to (1) identify whether our data show a similar correspondence between higher levels of transcription observed in the High LG offspring and epigenetic changes we expect based on studies in cancer cells and (2) examine whether the observed patterns at the level of individual probes are indicative of our analyses of RDme and RDac. Figure3c shows differences in H3K9 acetylation, DNA methylation, and RNA expression, with non-zero values indicating significant differences between High and Low LG offspring and line thickness denoting the standard error of the mean. In agreement with previous studies in cancer and the analyses of RDac/me above, H3K9 acetylation levels are significantly higher inside exons of the High LG offspring compared to the Low LG offspring, particularly the first and last exons (Fig. 3c – left panel). DNA methylation differences between the groups are, on average, significantly higher within exons among High LG offspring compared to Low LG offspring (Fig. 3c – middle panel). Expression differences inside exons indicate that High LG offspring show, on average, significantly higher RNA expression within annotated genes among High LG offspring compared to Low LG offspring (Fig. 3c – right panel). These data confirm previously published observations in cancer cells showing an association of actively transcribed genes with hyperacetylation and high methylation within exons [25], [26], [27], [29]. Taken together, these analyses within the regulatory and transcriptional elements of the genes in the locus are consistent with an observed significantly higher overall transcriptional activity among High LG adult offspring.

NR3C1 gene and identification of novel candidate genes regulated by maternal care

We previously reported that NR3C1 gene expression and H3K9 acetylation were increased and DNA methylation was decreased in the promoter of the exon 17 splice variant among High LG offspring compared to Low LG offspring [6], [7]. Using our comprehensive coverage of the entire NR3C1 locus we were able to identify additional novel regions of differential transcription, DNA methylation and histone acetylation in response to maternal care. We observed a number of RDme and RDac co-localized within intronic regions and upstream of the promoter region within the NR3C1 gene (Fig. 4a). The NR3C1 gene is known to contain at least 11 untranslated 5′ exon 1 splice variants that encode a common protein via a splice acceptor site on the exon 2. In this way, tissue-specific expression of NR3C1 is regulated by alternative splicing [30]. Our gene expression data agrees with previous studies showing that the expression of the GR exon 17 splice variant as well as that of exon 2 is increased in High LG offspring ([6], [7]; Fig. 4b). Furthermore, we also detected increased transcription among High LG offspring in each of the exon 1 splice variants known to be expressed in the hippocampus: GR15, GR16, GR17, GR110, and GR111 ([30]; Fig. 4b). These results suggest that broad epigenetic differences within the NR3C1 gene as well as the coordinated expression pattern of NR3C1 splice variants may be involved in the response to maternal care.

Figure 4
Epigenomic neighborhood of the glucocorticoid receptor gene.

In addition to the NR3C1 gene, a number of other genes show a significant number of RDme and are induced in response to differences in maternal care. We observed a broad genomic region that shows a cluster-wide response in DNA methylation and expression and exhibits the highest number of RDme relative to other regions in the locus: the -α, -β, and -γ protocadherin (Pcdh) gene clusters (82 of 696 RDme; P = 0.006, permutation test). Among Low LG offspring, we observed a significant enrichment for hypermethylated RDme across the entire Pcdh gene cluster (45 of a total of 350 RDme hypermethylated in Low LG offspring were found within the Pcdh gene clusters; P = 0.01, permutation test).

Pcdh genes are predominantly expressed in neurons at synaptic junctions, and the assembly of these cell surface proteins is regulated by differential promoter activation and alternative pre-mRNA splicing [31]. Although the mechanisms underlying differential promoter activation are not well understood, promoter DNA methylation and histone acetylation play a role in Pcdh gene silencing [32], [33]. Consistent with this hypothesis, Pcdh gene expression induced in response to High LG maternal care is accompanied by higher in exonic H3K9 acetylation and DNA methylation (P<1×10−300 for both by Wilcoxon rank sum test) and lower proximal promoter DNA methylation in a majority (17 of 23, or 74%) of Pcdh genes showing a significant increase in expression among High LG compared to Low LG offspring (Fig. 5). High LG offspring show a significant increase in transcription in 20 Pcdh of 33 genes profiled within the Pcdh gene clusters (Table S1). Taken together, these results showing a transcriptional and epigenetic response to maternal care across the Pcdh gene family suggest that the epigenomic response to maternal care may act coordinately on a family of genes localized in the same broad genomic region.

Figure 5
Epigenomic neighborhoods of the first exons in protocadherin gene clusters.


The quality of maternal care in rodents has a widespread impact on phenotype that persists into adulthood, providing a model to study epigenetic mechanisms mediating the impact of the early life social environment on health later in life [6]. In this study, we asked whether our traditional approach examining the regulatory elements of candidate genes reflects the totality of the epigenetic response to naturally occurring environmental stimuli. By extending our analysis beyond the predicted boundaries of the NR3C1 gene using high-density coverage of megabases of sequence, we investigated whether changes are limited to a small number of candidate genes, whether the changes are limited to 5′ regulatory regions and whether they are exclusive to regions encoding mRNAs.

We found non-random patterns of epigenetic and transcriptional alterations in a number of genes in association with differences in maternal care (Fig. 2). The specificity of this pattern is further underscored by the fact that both increased and decreased peaks of acetylation and DNA methylation are observed throughout the region. However, the response is gene-specific, as not all genes appear to respond to differences in maternal care (Table S1). Differences in broad epigenetic marks co-cluster over large distances (Fig. 3a), supporting previous work in cancer cells and suggesting the possibility of widespread epigenetic effects on multiple genes in the same genomic regions in response to maternal care. Analysis of our data with respect to protein-coding genes reveals expected relationships between epigenetic marks and gene expression levels. Increased transcription is associated with decreased 5′ DNA methylation and increased exonic H3K9 acetylation and DNA methylation (Fig. 3b–c). Previous studies have examined the relationships between differences in DNA methylation and histone acetylation and gene expression in on/off states of gene expression activity, as seen in cancer and cellular differentiation paradigms[23], [25], [26], [27], [29]. Our data suggest that the modulation of gene expression in response to environmental stimuli follows the same rules.

Our approach using high-density tiling microarrays also provided us with a “macroscopic” perspective of the epigenetic and transcriptional responses to maternal care. By zooming out of the specific suspected regions, we discovered differentially-methylated and acetylated regions that span large domains of sequence in the vicinity of the NR3C1 gene (Fig. 4a). Among adult offspring of animals that had received relatively low levels of maternal care, we identified several hypermethylated RDme and hyperacetylated RDac upstream of the 5′ NR3C1 exon variants as well as in intronic regions, where transcription was also detected. These results suggest the possible involvement of non-coding RNAs and alternative splice variants in response to maternal care. Future studies are required to determine whether these broad regions that are differentially methylated in response to maternal care regulate NR3C1 expression.

Although when examined individually, different regions exhibit highly specific responses (Fig. 4b; Fig. 5a–b), large-scale patterns emerge when we use a “macro” view of the entire chromosomal region (Fig. 2). Both increased and decreased peaks of acetylation and DNA methylation are observed throughout the region. In addition, of the 29 transcripts showing statistically significant differences in transcription, all are significantly more expressed among High LG adult offspring (Table S1). These data indicate specificity in transcriptional changes at the single gene level as well as an overall common response at a “large-scale” level consisting of many neighboring genes. The fact that the observed response is a result of a naturally-occurring variation in maternal care rather than average “static” levels of histone acetylation and DNA methylation points to the possibility that a long-range coordinated regulation of genome function may play a role in the long-term programming of the genome.

One possible role for clustering of epigenetic responses across wide areas is the coordinate regulation of a large group of functionally related genes. We discovered that the expression of a large cluster of the Pcdh genes is coordinately regulated with respect to maternal care. Remarkably, the increase in gene expression in the High maternal care group spans genes within each of the Pcdh gene clusters (Fig. 1c; Fig. 5a–b). This family of genes correspondingly contains a significant overrepresentation of differentially methylated regions. It is interesting to speculate that the Pcdh gene family may have evolved though gene duplication as a class of functionally-related genes under coordinate epigenetic regulation. Indeed, coordinated silencing of the Pcdh family of genes was seen in cancer [34]. However, in cancer, processes related to cell-selection might be involved in a progressive spreading of DNA methylation [35], [36], [37].

We recognize that we do not yet know whether differences in Pcdh gene expression play a role in the effects of maternal care on brain function in offspring. Future studies are needed to examine the consequences of the epigenetic regulation of Pcdh gene expression for the regulation of Pcdh protein and downstream functional effects. Pcdh genes are preferentially expressed in neurons, including the hippocampus, and regulate synaptic development and function [38]. Pcdh-α gene expression during rodent neural development is highest in early postnatal life (until PD21), when it is involved in specifying the innervation of serotonergic neurons in the hippocampus [39]. Studies indicate enduring influences of differences in maternal care on hippocampal neuroplasticity, including effects on LTP [40], [41] and synaptic morphology [42], [43]. Indeed, a rich literature suggests widespread effects of the prenatal and postnatal environment on the developing brain (for reviews see [44], [45]). For example, whereas other maternal factors such as maternal stress during pregnancy induce long-term influences on behavior, including hippocampally-mediated fear conditioning and spatial learning, adoption studies show that postnatal maternal care can reverse these effects [11], [13], [46]. Both hippocampal synaptic density and LTP as well as contextual fear conditioning and spatial learning vary as a function of maternal care in the rat [10], [15]. It is interesting to speculate that differences in Pcdh gene regulation may be functionally relevant for hippocampal development.

The mechanisms responsible for this coordinated epigenomic response and its maintenance into adulthood are unknown. We observed a broad epigenomic response associated with an extensive difference in gene expression. These broad epigenomic and transcriptome changes occurred not in response to disease (e.g. cancer) [34] or artificial interventions (e.g., gene knock-out or exposure to toxins), but in the context of a natural variation in maternal behavior. Although the changes are broad, not all genes are affected. The specificity of the response and its pattern are consistent with the hypothesis that the epigenetic response is indeed a biological signal. Our data suggest that epigenetic variations in the context of early life environment variations and perhaps other environmental influences involve coordinate changes in gene-networks rather than dramatic changes in a single or few genes. Our data also suggest that this response may involve more than protein coding mRNAs. Our traditional approaches to examine relationships between epigenetic regulation, gene function and phenotype were developed to examine changes within genetic elements defined apriori (promoters, exons, 3′ gene ends) in single or few candidate genes. If, in addition, the response to an environmental stimulus such as maternal care involves more widespread or coordinated changes across multiple genomic regions, new experimental approaches are needed to examine the contribution of these changes to the ultimate phenotype. Our data suggest multiple levels of variations in DNA methylation and H3K9 acetylation, from site-specific gene-specific responses as previously reported [6], [17] to the regional responses shown in this study. Although future experiments are needed to address the relative role of “micro” and “macro” epigenetic responses, these data suggest that the broad epigenetic regulation of gene expression may form part of a coordinated response to early maternal care.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All procedures were performed according to guidelines developed by the Canadian Council on Animal Care and the protocol was approved by the McGill University Animal Care Committee, permit number 3284.

Subjects and tissue preparation

Three to 4 animals per group were used in all microarray and quantitative immunoprecipitation experiments. An additional cohort of 8 animals per group was used for gene expression analysis. A maximum of 2 animals from any one litter were used, to control for possible effects attributable to variation between litters rather than variation as a function of High and Low LG. The animals were Long-Evans hooded rats born in our colony originally obtained from Charles River Canada (St. Constant, Québec). Maternal behavior was scored by using a version of the procedure described elsewhere[16]. Hippocampal tissue was dissected from 90-day-old (adult) male High and Low LG offspring and stored at −80°C. Genomic DNA extraction (DNeasy, Qiagen) and quantification (Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific) as well as RNA extraction (RNeasy plus, Qiagen) and quality assessment (Bioanalyzer 2100, Agilent) were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (see Methods S1 for details).

Chromatin/DNA immunoprecipitation and microarray hybridization

The procedure for methylated DNA immunoprecipitation was adapted from previously published work,[47], [48], [49] and H3K9 acetylation ChIP assays[50] were performed using the ChIP assay kit protocol (06-599, Upstate Biotechnology), as previously described[6]. The amplification (Whole Genome Amplification kit, Sigma) and labeling reaction (CGH labeling kit, Invitrogen), and all the steps of hybridization, washing and scanning were performed following the Agilent protocol for chip-on-chip analysis (see Methods S1 for details). Three animals per group were used in the immunoprecipitation microarray experiments, and microarrays were hybridized in triplicate for each sample.

cDNA microarray hybridization

RNA spike-in controls (Agilent) were added to RNA prior to generating cDNA. The cDNA was amplified and labeled with Cy3 or Cy5 (GE Healthcare) according to manufacturer's instructions (Fairplay III, Agilent; See Methods S1 for details). Four animals per group were used for the gene expression microarrays, and a dye-swap experiment was performed for each subject in duplicate.

Microarray design and analysis

Custom 44 K tiling arrays were designed using eArray (Agilent technologies). Probes of approximately 55 bp were selected to tile all unique regions within approximately 3.5 MB upstream and downstream of the NR3C1 gene described in Ensembl (version 44) at 100 bp-spacing. Probe intensities were extracted from hybridization images using Agilent's Feature Extraction 9.5.3 Image Analysis Software and analyzed using the R software environment for statistical computing[51]. Log-ratios of the bound (Cy5) and input (Cy3) microarray channel intensities were computed for each microarray. Each microarray was normalized using quantile-normalization[52] assuming an identical overall distribution of measurement across all samples. Gene expression levels were estimated as the mean probe values across exons. DNA methylation and H3K9 acetylation levels at genomic locations were estimated using a Bayesian convolution algorithm to incorporate probe values from nearby probes[53]. Gene expression differences associated with maternal care were obtained using RMA[54] applied to sample probe values inside exons. RDme/ac were identified by computing a modified t-statistic for each probe and then significant levels of agreement across 1000 bp regions. Enrichment of RDac and RDme was determined by comparing base-pair overlap of these regions with overlap of randomly selected RDac/RDme (see Methods S1 for details). All microarray data are MIAME compliant and the raw data have been deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) at NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), accession number pending.

Quantitative real-time PCR of immunoprecipitated samples (qCHIP)

Gene-specific real-time PCR validation of microarray was performed in an identical manner for H3K9 acetylation and DNA methylation enrichment[21] for the same subjects used for microarray experiments (n = 3/group; see Methods S1 for details). Relative enrichment of triplicate reactions were determined as a ratio of the crossing point threshold (Ct) of the amplified immunoprecipitated fraction (with either anti-histone H3K9 acetylation or anti 5-meC antibody) over the Ct of the amplified input genomic DNA fraction according to the formula: IP(Ct)/IN(Ct). The calculated immunoprecipitation enrichment was plotted and standard error bars were displayed.

Sodium bisulfite mapping of DNA methylation

Sodium bisulfite mapping was performed as previously described[55]. After gene-specific PCR amplification (Table S2) of sodium bisulfite treated DNA for each subject, a mix of 10 ng of the gel-extracted PCR product from all of the subjects from each High and Low LG group (n = 3/group) were used for subsequent molecular cloning (Cequation 8800, Beckman-Coulter). We obtained 20 clones for sequencing from 2–3 independent PCR reactions for each subject.


The genes verified for differences in DNA methylation by qCHIP analysis were further analyzed for genotyping using identical primers (Table S2). The resulting PCR products for each subject were sequenced bidirectionally using the forward and the reverse primer by Genome Quebec (ABI 3100, Applied Biosystems). Genetic variation was assessed throughout the PCR amplicon used for qCHIP analysis by alignment of genomic DNA with the published gene sequence (CLC Workbench, CLC bio).

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis

The expression patterns of 45 transcripts examined by microarray were quantified. For genes shown in Figure 1c (also see Table S1) primer design (Table S2) and analysis were performed by Genome Quebec (ABI lightcycler, ABI biosystems), whereby the expression of an additional 7 housekeeping genes (Actb, Gapdh, Gusb, Pum1, Rpl19, Rps18, Tubb5) was assessed for the same subjects used for microarray hybridization. The gene showing the least variance between High and Low LG adult offspring was selected as the reference gene for all subjects (GusB), and statistical significance, fold differences and standard errors of the mean were calculated according to published methods using the freely-available Relative Expression Software Tool program[56]. For the quantification of gene expression differences related to the NR3C1 gene shown in Figure 4b and the Pcdh gene clusters shown in Figure 5 (also see Table S1), a standard curve was generated from 7 serial dilutions of a mixture of cDNA from each High and Low LG offspring, and gene expression was quantified relative to the tubulin housekeeping gene (480 lightcycler, Roche) for an additional cohort of 8 High LG and 8 Low LG offspring, according to previously published methods (Table S2; [19], [57]). All reactions for all genes were performed in triplicate and statistical significance was determined as P<0.05 using one-tailed t-tests.

Supporting Information

Methods S1

(0.08 MB PDF)

Table S1

Genes with higher expression in High LG offspring. Listed are the fold change for 44 transcripts selected for gene expression profiling (High LG/Low LG). Expression is significantly higher in the High LG offspring for 29 transcripts (** = P<0.01, * = P<0.05). Also shown are distances to the nearest RDme and RDac both before and after the transcription start site of each gene, and whether they are hyper-methylated/acetylated or hypo-methylated/acetylated in High relative to Low LG adult offspring.

(0.04 MB XLS)

Table S2

Sequence information for primers used for H3K9 acetylation, DNA methylation, and gene expression validation of microarrays.

(0.04 MB XLS)

Figure S1

Pearson correlation between DNA methylation levels estimated from microarray data and levels estimated from qChIP for each gene validated by quantitative real-time PCR (red circles).

(0.07 MB TIF)

Figure S2

DNA methylation validated by sodium bisulfite mapping showing expected enrichment of DNA methylation in Low (black bars) compared to High LG (white bars) animals for the majority of CpG sites examined. These data confirm the enrichment in Low LG relative to High LG offspring estimated from microarray and qChIP.

(0.10 MB TIF)

Figure S3

DNA methylation, H3K9 acetylation and gene expression levels. (a) Average levels of H3K9 acetylation and DNA methylation across all regions, and gene expression levels within protein coding exons only for all subjects are depicted across the 7Mb region centered at the NR3C1 gene (see Supporting Methods for calculation of levels). (b) Levels across gene-associated regions for all genes are depicted. (c) Levels are depicted across CpG islands (H3K9 acetylation levels are red, DNA methylation levels are blue, and gene expression levels are green). All data are mean values and line thickness denotes SEM.

(0.30 MB TIF)

Figure S4

An example of predicted nucleosome occupancy and actual H3K9 acetylation levels estimated from microarray data for Protocadherin-α genes. Predictions were obtained in silico solely from DNA sequence using a previously published tool [1].

(0.32 MB TIF)


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Mental Health (CIHR) and the Sackler Foundation to MJM and MS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Prescott CA. Toward a comprehensive developmental model for major depression in women. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1133–1145. [PubMed]
2. McEwen BS. Early life influences on life-long patterns of behavior and health. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9:149–154. [PubMed]
3. Nemeroff CB. Neurobiological consequences of childhood trauma. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65(Suppl 1):18–28. [PubMed]
4. Nemeroff CC. Early-Life Adversity, CRF Dysregulation, and Vulnerability to Mood and Anxiety Disorders. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2004;38:14–20. [PubMed]
5. Coldwell J, Pike A, Dunn J. Household chaos—links with parenting and child behaviour. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47:1116–1122. [PubMed]
6. Weaver IC, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D'Alessio AC, Sharma S, et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:847–854. [PubMed]
7. Francis D, Diorio J, Liu D, Meaney MJ. Nongenomic transmission across generations of maternal behavior and stress responses in the rat. Science. 1999;286:1155–1158. [PubMed]
8. Menard JL, Hakvoort RM. Variations of maternal care alter offspring levels of behavioural defensiveness in adulthood: evidence for a threshold model. Behav Brain Res. 2007;176:302–313. [PubMed]
9. Caldji C, Diorio J, Meaney MJ. Variations in maternal care alter GABA(A) receptor subunit expression in brain regions associated with fear. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28:1950–1959. [PubMed]
10. Liu D, Diorio J, Day JC, Francis DD, Meaney MJ. Maternal care, hippocampal synaptogenesis and cognitive development in rats. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:799–806. [PubMed]
11. Bredy TW, Humpartzoomian RA, Cain DP, Meaney MJ. Partial reversal of the effect of maternal care on cognitive function through environmental enrichment. Neuroscience. 2003;118:571–576. [PubMed]
12. Toki S, Morinobu S, Imanaka A, Yamamoto S, Yamawaki S, et al. Importance of early lighting conditions in maternal care by dam as well as anxiety and memory later in life of offspring. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:815–829. [PubMed]
13. Bredy TW, Zhang TY, Grant RJ, Diorio J, Meaney MJ. Peripubertal environmental enrichment reverses the effects of maternal care on hippocampal development and glutamate receptor subunit expression. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20:1355–1362. [PubMed]
14. Bredy TW, Grant RJ, Champagne DL, Meaney MJ. Maternal care influences neuronal survival in the hippocampus of the rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;18:2903–2909. [PubMed]
15. Champagne DL, Bagot RC, van Hasselt F, Ramakers G, Meaney MJ, et al. Maternal care and hippocampal plasticity: evidence for experience-dependent structural plasticity, altered synaptic functioning, and differential responsiveness to glucocorticoids and stress. J Neurosci. 2008;28:6037–6045. [PubMed]
16. Champagne FA, Francis DD, Mar A, Meaney MJ. Variations in maternal care in the rat as a mediating influence for the effects of environment on development. Physiol Behav. 2003;79:359–371. [PubMed]
17. McGowan PO, Sasaki A, D'Alessio AC, Dymov S, Labonte B, et al. Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:342–348. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. McGowan PO, Sasaki A, Huang TC, Unterberger A, Suderman M, et al. Promoter-wide hypermethylation of the ribosomal RNA gene promoter in the suicide brain. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2085. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Weaver IC, Meaney MJ, Szyf M. Maternal care effects on the hippocampal transcriptome and anxiety-mediated behaviors in the offspring that are reversible in adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:3480–3485. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Weaver IC, Champagne FA, Brown SE, Dymov S, Sharma S, et al. Reversal of maternal programming of stress responses in adult offspring through methyl supplementation: altering epigenetic marking later in life. J Neurosci. 2005;25:11045–11054. [PubMed]
21. Sadikovic B, Yoshimoto M, Al-Romaih K, Maire G, Zielenska M, et al. In vitro analysis of integrated global high-resolution DNA methylation profiling with genomic imbalance and gene expression in osteosarcoma. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2834. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Birney E, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Dutta A, Guigo R, Gingeras TR, et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007;447:799–816. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Suzuki MM, Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:465–476. [PubMed]
24. Rauch TA, Wu X, Zhong X, Riggs AD, Pfeifer GP. A human B cell methylome at 100-base pair resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:671–678. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Segal E, Widom J. What controls nucleosome positions? Trends Genet. 2009;25:335–343. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Smith DT, Hosken DJ, Ffrench-Constant RH, Wedell N. Variation in sex peptide expression in D. melanogaster. Genet Res. 2009;91:237–242. [PubMed]
27. Nishida H, Suzuki T, Kondo S, Miura H, Fujimura Y, et al. Histone H3 acetylated at lysine 9 in promoter is associated with low nucleosome density in the vicinity of transcription start site in human cell. Chromosome Res. 2006;14:203–211. [PubMed]
28. Kaplan N, Moore IK, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Gossett AJ, Tillo D, et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature. 2009;458:362–366. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Flanagan JM, Munoz-Alegre M, Henderson S, Tang T, Sun P, et al. Gene-body hypermethylation of ATM in peripheral blood DNA of bilateral breast cancer patients. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:1332–1342. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. McCormick JA, Lyons V, Jacobson MD, Noble J, Diorio J, et al. 5'-heterogeneity of glucocorticoid receptor messenger RNA is tissue specific: differential regulation of variant transcripts by early-life events. Mol Endocrinol. 2000;14:506–517. [PubMed]
31. Yagi T. Clustered protocadherin family. Dev Growth Differ. 2008;50(Suppl 1):S131–140. [PubMed]
32. Tasic B, Nabholz CE, Baldwin KK, Kim Y, Rueckert EH, et al. Promoter choice determines splice site selection in protocadherin alpha and gamma pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2002;10:21–33. [PubMed]
33. Kawaguchi M, Toyama T, Kaneko R, Hirayama T, Kawamura Y, et al. Relationship between DNA methylation states and transcription of individual isoforms encoded by the protocadherin-alpha gene cluster. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:12064–12075. [PubMed]
34. Novak P, Jensen T, Oshiro MM, Watts GS, Kim CJ, et al. Agglomerative epigenetic aberrations are a common event in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8616–8625. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Coolen MW, Stirzaker C, Song JZ, Statham AL, Kassir Z, et al. Consolidation of the cancer genome into domains of repressive chromatin by long-range epigenetic silencing (LRES) reduces transcriptional plasticity. Nat Cell Biol. 12:235–246. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Rideout WM, 3rd, Eversole-Cire P, Spruck CH, 3rd, Hustad CM, Coetzee GA, et al. Progressive increases in the methylation status and heterochromatinization of the myoD CpG island during oncogenic transformation. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:6143–6152. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Wong DJ, Foster SA, Galloway DA, Reid BJ. Progressive region-specific de novo methylation of the p16 CpG island in primary human mammary epithelial cell strains during escape from M(0) growth arrest. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:5642–5651. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Junghans D, Haas IG, Kemler R. Mammalian cadherins and protocadherins: about cell death, synapses and processing. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:446–452. [PubMed]
39. Katori S, Hamada S, Noguchi Y, Fukuda E, Yamamoto T, et al. Protocadherin-alpha family is required for serotonergic projections to appropriately innervate target brain areas. J Neurosci. 2009;29:9137–9147. [PubMed]
40. Wilson DA, Willner J, Kurz EM, Nadel L. Early handling increases hippocampal long-term potentiation in young rats. Behav Brain Res. 1986;21:223–227. [PubMed]
41. Tang AC, Zou B. Neonatal exposure to novelty enhances long-term potentiation in CA1 of the rat hippocampus. Hippocampus. 2002;12:398–404. [PubMed]
42. Poeggel G, Helmeke C, Abraham A, Schwabe T, Friedrich P, et al. Juvenile emotional experience alters synaptic composition in the rodent cortex, hippocampus, and lateral amygdala. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:16137–16142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Ovtscharoff W, Jr, Helmeke C, Braun K. Lack of paternal care affects synaptic development in the anterior cingulate cortex. Brain Res. 2006;1116:58–63. [PubMed]
44. Korosi A, Baram TZ. Plasticity of the stress response early in life: Mechanisms and significance. Dev Psychobiol. 52:661–670. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Meaney MJ. Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1161–1192. [PubMed]
46. Wakshlak A, Weinstock M. Neonatal handling reverses behavioral abnormalities induced in rats by prenatal stress. Physiol Behav. 1990;48:289–292. [PubMed]
47. Weber M, Davies JJ, Wittig D, Oakeley EJ, Haase M, et al. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat Genet. 2005;37:853–862. [PubMed]
48. Keshet I, Schlesinger Y, Farkash S, Rand E, Hecht M, et al. Evidence for an instructive mechanism of de novo methylation in cancer cells. Nat Genet. 2006;38:149–153. [PubMed]
49. Brown SE, Szyf M. Dynamic epigenetic states of ribosomal RNA promoters during the cell cycle. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:382–390. [PubMed]
50. Crane-Robinson C, Myers FA, Hebbes TR, Clayton AL, Thorne AW. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays in acetylation mapping of higher eukaryotes. Methods Enzymol. 1999;304:533–547. [PubMed]
51. R Development Core Team. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
52. Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:185–193. [PubMed]
53. Down TA, Rakyan VK, Turner DJ, Flicek P, Li H, et al. A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:779–785. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4:249–264. [PubMed]
55. Clark SJ, Harrison J, Paul CL, Frommer M. High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:2990–2997. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L. Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e36. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Zou C, Huang W, Ying G, Wu Q. Sequence analysis and expression mapping of the rat clustered protocadherin gene repertoires. Neuroscience. 2007;144:579–603. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • BioProject
    BioProject links
  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    NCBI Bookshelf books that cite the current articles.
  • GEO DataSets
    GEO DataSets
    Gene expression and molecular abundance data reported in the current articles that are also included in the curated Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) DataSets.
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem chemical substance records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records.

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...