• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of bmcmbBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Molecular Biology
BMC Mol Biol. 2010; 11: 88.
Published online Nov 21, 2010. doi:  10.1186/1471-2199-11-88
PMCID: PMC3002352

Expression of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, p-hydroxybenzoate-m-geranyltransferase and genes of phenylpropanoid pathway exhibits positive correlation with shikonins content in arnebia [Arnebia euchroma (Royle) Johnston]

Abstract

Background

Geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP) and p-hydroxybenzoate (PHB) are the basic precursors involved in shikonins biosynthesis. GPP is derived from mevalonate (MVA) and/or 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway(s), depending upon the metabolite and the plant system under consideration. PHB, however, is synthesized by only phenylpropanoid (PP) pathway. GPP and PHB are central moieties to yield shikonins through the synthesis of m-geranyl-p-hydroxybenzoate (GHB). Enzyme p-hydroxybenzoate-m-geranyltransferase (PGT) catalyses the coupling of GPP and PHB to yield GHB.

The present research was carried out in shikonins yielding plant arnebia [Arnebia euchroma (Royle) Johnston], wherein no molecular work has been reported so far. The objective of the work was to identify the preferred GPP synthesizing pathway for shikonins biosynthesis, and to determine the regulatory genes involved in the biosynthesis of GPP, PHB and GHB.

Results

A cell suspension culture-based, low and high shikonins production systems were developed to facilitate pathway identification and finding the regulatory gene. Studies with mevinolin and fosmidomycin, inhibitors of MVA and MEP pathway, respectively suggested MVA as a preferred route of GPP supply for shikonins biosynthesis in arnebia. Accordingly, genes of MVA pathway (eight genes), PP pathway (three genes), and GHB biosynthesis were cloned. Expression studies showed down-regulation of all the genes in response to mevinolin treatment, whereas gene expression was not influenced by fosmidomycin. Expression of all the twelve genes vis-à-vis shikonins content in low and high shikonins production system, over a period of twelve days at frequent intervals, identified critical genes of shikonins biosynthesis in arnebia.

Conclusion

A positive correlation between shikonins content and expression of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (AeHMGR) and AePGT suggested critical role played by these genes in shikonins biosynthesis. Higher expression of genes of PP pathway was a general feature for higher shikonins biosynthesis.

Background

Shikonins are red naphthoquinone pigments, which possess anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory and anti-tumour activities [1]. These are active ingredient in several pharmaceutical and cosmetics preparations, and used as dye for fabrics and food items [1,2]. Commercially, shikonins are extracted from roots of Lithospermum erythrorhizon with 0.14-1.09% yield [2]. Arnebia [Arnebia euchroma (Royle) Johnston (family, Boraginaceae)] is another plant species that yields 1.58-1.94% shikonins from roots [3]. The plant is naturally distributed in drier regions of Asia and Northern Africa [4]. In India, it is well distributed in cold desert areas of Lahaul and Spiti district of Himachal Pradesh (latitude 32° 44' 57"-32° 59' 57" N; longitude 76° 46' 29" -78° 41' 34" E) at an altitude of >3800 m above mean sea level [5].

Shikonins are composed of p-hydroxybenzoate (PHB) and an isoprenoid moiety derived from geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP). PHB is synthesized through phenylpropanoid (PP) pathway, whereas GPP can be synthesized through cytosolic mevalonate (MVA) [6] and plastid 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) [7] pathway. In MVA pathway (Figure (Figure1),1), three molecules of acetyl-CoA couple to yield 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA), which is reduced by the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR) to yield MVA. In the next two steps, mevalonate kinase (MVK) and mevalonate 5-phosphate kinase (PMVK) catalyses conversion of MVA to form mevalonate 5-diphosphate (MVD), which in turn is decarboxylated to yield isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP). IPP is converted into geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP) using the enzyme geranyl diphosphate synthase (GDPS).

Figure 1
Shikonin biosynthesis pathway as adopted and modified from Inouye et al. [38]. Encircled numbers represent enzyme catalyzing the corresponding reaction step as follows: 1 ACTH: acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase; 2 HMGS: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase; ...

MEP pathway involves condensation of pyruvate and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate to yield 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate (DXP) using the enzyme DXP synthase (DXS). DXP yields 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) by a reaction catalysed by DXP reductoisomerase (DXR), and MEP is then transformed into IPP [8,9] followed by its conversion into GPP, as in the MVA pathway.

Supply of GPP is critical in realizing the yield of isoprenoids [10], therefore, study on regulation of gene expression in GPP biosynthesis is of immense significance. Depending upon the metabolite and species under consideration, the preference for the route to GPP biosynthesis might differ. For example, natural rubber relies on MVA pathway, whereas stevioside is derived through MEP pathway [11,12].

GPP and PHB are coupled through a reaction catalysed by p-hydroxybenzoate-m-geranyltransferase (PGT) to yield m-geranyl-p-hydroxybenzoate (GHB; Figure Figure1),1), which later leads to the biosynthesis of shikonins [13,14]. Earlier work on shikonins biosynthesis was carried out in L. erythrorhizon using one gene of the MVA pathway (HMGR), three genes of PP pathway (PAL, C4H, and 4CL), and PGT. HMGR and PGT were shown to be regulatory genes in L. erythrorhizon [14,15]. Information on other genes in relation to shikonins biosynthesis, however, has not been reported for L. erythrorhizon. Arnebia is an important source for shikonins with no molecular data on any of the genes involved in shikonins biosynthesis. Also, the relative importance of MVA or MEP pathway in relation to shikonins is not yet reported. Therefore, the present research was carried out in arnebia to (a) identify the major GPP synthesizing pathways (MVA versus MEP) contributing to shikonins biosynthesis, (b) clone various genes of the pathway, and (c) understand expression regulation of the genes of the identified pathway. The knowledge so generated will help to understand molecular basis of shikonins biosynthesis in arnebia and would lay basis of metabolic engineering for this important moiety.

Results

Inhibitor studies suggested MVA as a preferred pathway for shikonins biosynthesis

To facilitate inhibitor studies, protocols for cell suspension culture were developed wherein shikonins content could be modulated. Shikonins content was recorded in traces (3.58 mgl-1) in suspension cultures maintained in growth medium [low shikonins production system (LSPS)]. The content, increased to 67.3 mgl-1 at day 1 of transfer of cultures from growth medium into production medium M9 [high shikonins production system (HSPS)]. Shikonins content increased to 478.8 mgl-1 at day 10 of the transfer to production medium M9 and declined thereafter, possibly due to senescence. The shikonins content remained in traces in LSPS during the entire period of experimentation.

At day zero (i.e. the day of transfer of culture from growth to production medium), when shikonins content was negligible, mevinolin (inhibitor of MVA pathway) and fosmidomycin (inhibitor of MEP pathway) were added separately at three different concentrations (50, 100 and 200 μM) and the samples were harvested at day 4 and day 8 of the treatment.

Lower concentration (50 μM) of mevinolin was found to be less effective as compared to the higher concentrations (100 and 200 μM) to inhibit shikonins production (Figure (Figure2a).2a). A similar level of inhibition observed in the presence of 100 and 200 μM of mevinolin suggested 100 μM to be optimal concentration for further experimentation. Of the day 4 and day 8 of the treatment, maximum inhibition was observed at day 8 of the inhibitor treatment wherein shikonins content was lower by 92.82% of the control (Figure (Figure2a).2a). However, shikonins content was not reduced so drastically in the presence of fosmidomycin and the value was 50.03% of the control at day 8 of the treatment. These results suggested the predominant role of MVA pathway in shikonins biosynthesis in arnebia.

Figure 2
Effect of inhibitors of mevalonate (MVA) and 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway on (a) shikonins biosynthesis, and (b) gene expression at day 4 and day 8 of the treatment. Mevinolin is an inhibitor of MVA pathway while fosmidomycin inhibits ...

Twelve genes associated with MVA pathway, PP pathway and GHB biosynthesis were cloned

Since MVA was a predominant pathway for GPP supply for shikonins biosynthesis, all the genes of the pathway were cloned along with those associated with PP pathway and GHB biosynthesis. Degenerate primers for AeACTH, AeHMGS, AeMVK, AePMVK, AeMVDD, AeGDPS, AeIPPI, AePAL, AeC4H and Ae4-CL yielded 540 bp, 413 bp, 474 bp, 286 bp, 495 bp, 620 bp, 361 bp, 809 bp, 270 bp and 531 bp sized amplicons, respectively (Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1). Though in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) several amplicons were obtained in some of the cases, but the amplicons mentioned above were the ones which exhibited strong homology with the reported genes in the database. Partial gene sequences allowed designing of primers for rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) to clone full-length genes. As mentioned in Methods section, availability of expressed sequence tag (EST) for AeHMGR and AePGT in the EST databank, facilitated designing of primers of these two genes for RACE.

Size and accession number of all the partial and full-length cDNAs are mentioned in Additional file 2: Supplementary Table S2. Ten full-length cDNAs namely, AeACTH (1.636 Kb), AeHMGR (2.007 Kb), AePMVK (1.745 Kb), AeMVDD (1.576 Kb), AeIPPI (894 bp), AeGDPS (1.483 Kb), AePGT (1.203 Kb), AePAL (2.380 Kb), AeC4H (1.767 Kb) and Ae4-CL (2.121 Kb) could be cloned. In spite of several attempts, full-length cDNAs of AeMVK and AeHMGS could not be cloned. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the cloned genes are provided in Additional file 3: Supplementary Figure S1, whereas sequence alignment with the respective reported sequences from other plants is provided in Additional file 4: Supplementary Figure S2. Characteristics domains in deduced amino acid sequences of the genes are mentioned in Additional file 5: Supplementary Figure S3. SOPMA (Self-Optimized Prediction Method with Alignment) analysis for prediction of secondary structures in terms of helices, β turns, extended strands and random coils is provided in Additional file 6: Supplementary Figure S4).

Deduced amino acid sequence of all the genes possessed the required motifs and secondary structures (Additional file 5: Supplementary Figure S3 and Additional file 6: Supplementary Figure S4), which are essential to render characteristic functionality, as described previously in other plant systems. These examples include ACTH from Raphanus sativus [16]; HMGS from Brassica juncea [17]; HMGR [18]; MVK [19], MVDD [20], IPPI [21], 4-CL [22], and PAL [23] from Arabidopsis thaliana; GDPS from Abies grandis [24]; C4H from Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides [25] and PGT from L. erythrorhizon [14].

Down-regulation of all the twelve genes in response to mevinolin treatment

Amplicons of AeACTH, AeHMGS, AeHMGR, AePMVK, AeMVDD, AeGDPS, AeIPPI, AePGT, AePAL, AeC4H and Ae4-CL exhibited down-regulation starting from day 4 of the mevinolin treatment. At day 8, amplicons were hardly visible in mevinolin treated cells. The genes expressed well in untreated control throughout the experimentation period suggesting extreme down-regulation of the genes in response to mevinolin treatment. Unlike mevinolin, fosmidomycin did not affect expression of these genes throughout the experimentation period [Figure [Figure2b;2b; Additional file 7: Supplementary S5 shows integrated density value (IDV) of the amplicons as in Figure Figure2b].2b]. At day 8 of the treatment, correlation coefficient between shikonins content and IDV of the amplicons was found to be 0.87 (AeACTH), 0.77 (AeHMGS), 0.71 (AeHMGR), 0.62 (AeMVK), 0.89 (AePMVK), 0.82 (AeMVDD), 0.83 (AeIPPI), 0.83 (AeGDPS), 0.88 (AePGT), 0.83 (AePAL), 0.68 (AeC4H), and 0.73 (Ae4-CL) indicating a positive correlation between the shikonins content and gene expression (Table (Table11).

Table 1
Correlation coefficient between gene expression and shikonins content in arnebia.

Kinetics of gene expression vis-à-vis shikonins content in LSPS and HSPS identified critical genes

Shikonins content in HSPS was 67.3, 77.6, 151, 172, 227.6, 322.6, 478.8 and 397.4 mgl-1 at day 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12, respectively of sub-culturing of suspension culture into production medium. However in LSPS, shikonins content at above days was 3.58, 3.76, 3.24, 2.3, 13.2, 10.5, 8.2 and 4.8 mgl-1, respectively (Figure (Figure3c).3c). Analysis of all the twelve genes in HSPS and LSPS on the above days showed evident up-regulation of AeHMGR at day 2 onwards and the expression was 94-148% in HSPS as compared to LSPS.

Figure 3
Expression of various genes in (a) low shikonins producing system (LSPS), and (b) high shikonins producing system (HSPS) vis-à-vis shikonins content (c). Shikonins content was very low in HSPS at day 1 and increased thereafter till day 10, whereas ...

AePGT showed up-regulation by 141-184.5% in HSPS as compared to LSPS. The genes of PP pathway namely, AePAL, AeC4H and Ae4-CL also exhibited higher up-regulation of gene expression in HSPS as compared to LSPS at day 2 onwards. Expression of AeACTH, AeHMGS, AeMVK, AePMVK, AeMVDD, AeIPPI and AeGDPS was very similar in LSPS and HSPS during the entire period of experimentation (Figure 3a, b and Additional file 8: Supplementary Figure S6 showing IDV of Figure 3a, b). The correlation coefficient between shikonins content and IDV of the amplicons in HSPS had a value of 0.95, 0.91, 0.57, 0.59, and, 0.50 for AeHMGR, AePGT, AePAL, AeC4H and Ae4-CL, respectively (Table (Table11).

Discussion

The PP and isoprenoid pathways synthesize array of secondary metabolites, which perform diverse functions in plants ranging from growth and development to defense. Some of these compounds have economic values and also have implications to human health. Red coloured, bioactive shikonins are such molecules which are used in food, fabric and pharmaceutical industries [1,2].

Chemically, shikonins are composed of isoprenoid (e.g. GPP) and PHB moieties, which are also referred to as yield determining moieties [14]. Plants have single PP pathway for the synthesis of PHB, whereas GPP is synthesised through MVA and MEP pathways. The preference for MVA versus MEP pathway depends upon the metabolites and the plant species under consideration [11,12]. Coupling of the two moieties, GPP and PHB, is mediated through the enzyme PGT encoded by PGT.

Biosynthesis of shikonins predominantly uses MVA pathway for GPP supply

Relative contribution of MVA versus MEP pathway towards shikonins biosynthesis was assessed by using mevinolin and fosmidomycin, which are inhibitors of HMGR (of MVA pathway) and DXR (of MEP pathway), respectively [26,27]. For such a study, a cell suspension culture-based system was developed wherein shikonins content increased from negligible quantity by 82.8 fold from day zero to day 10 of transferring the suspension cultures from LSPS to HSPS (Figure (Figure3c).3c). Inclusion of mevinolin produced a severe inhibition (92.82%) in shikonins accumulation (Figure (Figure2a),2a), whereas fosmidomycin produced a comparatively milder (49.97%) inhibition. Data thus implies a prominent role of MVA pathway in shikonins biosynthesis, though a role of MEP pathway can not be completely ruled out. The results are slightly different from L. erythrorhizon in which mevinolin inhibited the shikonins biosynthesis by 98% [28] suggesting that GPP for shikonins biosynthesis was derived from the MVA pathway. Involvement of both MVA and MEP pathway in terpenoid biosynthesis has been reported for dolichols biosynthesis in Coluria geoides [29], which might also be the case in arnebia.

Mevinolin down-regulated expression of all the twelve genes involved in GPP and GHB biosynthesis

Mevinolin is a known inhibitor of the enzyme HMGR. Down-regulation of expression of HMGR mRNA was reported in L. erythrorhizon in response to mevinolin treatment [15]. Information on the effect of mevinolin on expression of other genes of shikonins biosynthesis pathway is not available in L. erythrorhizon. Our data showed that mevinolin down-regulated expression of all the eight genes involved in MVA pathway, all the three gene of PP pathway and AePGT (Figure (Figure2b).2b). Application of fosmidomycin had no effect on expression of these genes. Data suggested a substrate/product mediated feed-back and feed-forward regulation of the genes under study. For HMGR, its post-transcriptional and post-translational feedback regulation was suggested in the experiments using arabidopsis treated with lovastatin (analogous to mevinolin) [30]. Previously, Dixon et al. [31] reported that endogenous cinnamate (product of PAL) caused inhibition of both transcription and enzymatic activity of PAL. Rani et al. [32] reported catechin-mediated down-regulation of several genes of PP pathway. In animal system, MVA pathway involved in the biosynthesis of cholesterol, has long been known to be regulated by end-product feedback inhibition and this regulation has been attributed to direct regulation of the expression of several cholesterol biosynthetic genes by the sterol sensing sterol regulatory element (SRE) binding protein-2 (SREBP-2) [33]. In yeast and higher plants, MVK was subjected to feed-back inhibition by GPP and FPP [34,35], suggesting feed-back inhibition by prenyl phosphates as a general regulatory mechanism to modulate the activity of MVK.

Existing literature thus supports the view of substrate mediated feedback inhibition, possibly that has been observed for HMGR, MVK and PAL. Overall down-regulation of other genes in response to mevinolin and fosmidomycin needs further investigations on substrate/product mediated feed-back and feed-forward regulation of the genes.

Not all genes exhibited up-regulation in HSPS

LSPS and HSPS provided a convenient system to study the possible regulatory genes in shikonins biosynthesis. Analysis of all the twelve genes showed that AeHMGR (of MVA pathway), and AePGT (involved in coupling of GPP and PHB) exhibited evident up-regulation in HSPS as compared to LSPS from day 2 onwards. Generally an up-regulation of all the genes of PP pathway was noticed in HSPS as compared to the LSPS. Earlier reports suggested HMGR enzyme to play a key role in the control of isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants [36,37]. Lange et al. [15] proposed the importance of HMGR as an early enzyme in isoprenoid biosynthesis to control the metabolic flux into the MVA pathway, in contrast to the stringently regulated later enzymes controlling the biosynthesis of specific end products. Our data also suggested that AeHMGR could be an important regulatory gene in shikonins biosynthesis, since a strong positive correlation (r, 0.95) was obtained between its expression and the shikonins content (Table (Table11).

A requirement of higher PP pathway appeared to be general feature for shikonins biosynthesis in arnebia as evidenced by higher expression of the three genes (Figure (Figure3).3). PP supplies PHB which is a substrate involved in shikonins biosynthesis [38,39]. While in L. erythrorhizon genes of PP pathway did not exhibit any specific trend in relation to shikonins biosynthesis [40], data on arnebia appears to be in line with the previous reports on tea [32,41] wherein all the three genes of PP pathway were reported to be regulatory.

AePGT encodes for PGT enzyme involved in GHB biosynthesis. This gene also showed up-regulation (three times) in HSPS and was positively correlated (r, 0.91) with shikonins content. Heide and Tabata [42] reported high (thirty five times) activity of PGT enzyme in shikonins producing culture extracts of L. erythrorhizon as compared to the non-shikonins producing system suggesting PGT to be important in regulating of biosynthesis of shikonins.

Conclusion

Arnebia prominently uses MVA pathway for the synthesis of GPP to be utilized in shikonins biosynthesis. Analyses of all the twelve genes suggested the importance of AeHMGR, all the genes of PP pathway and AePGT in realizing the shikonins yield in arnebia. This is the first report wherein twelve genes of shikonins biosynthesis pathway have been analysed to identify the regulatory genes and hence have implications in synthetic biology for shikonins production.

Methods

Plant material

Plants of arnebia [Arnebia euchroma (Royle) Johnston] were procured from Kibber (a niche site of arnebia; latitude 32° 20' 11" N; longitude 78° 00' 52"E; 4200 m above mean sea level) in Lahaul and Spiti district of Himachal Pradesh, India and maintained in plastic pots (20 cm height x 20 cm top width x 12 cm bottom width) containing soil, sand, and farm yard manure mixture in a ratio of 2:1:1 at the Institute at Palampur (latitude 32° 06' 32" N; longitude 76° 33' 43" E; 1300 m above mean sea level).

Establishment of arnebia cell suspension cultures and inhibitor experiment

Shoot cultures were raised using rhizome buds as explants after surface sterilization with 0.04% mercuric chloride. The medium used was agar gelled Murashige and Skoog medium (MS) [43] supplemented with kinetin (Kn: 5.0 μM). The leaves from in vitro shoots were cut into 0.3-0.5 cm2 segments and inoculated with their adaxial surface in contact with agar gelled MS + 6-benzyl aminopurine (BAP: 10.0 μM) + indole-3-butyric acid (IBA: 5.0 μM) in Petri plates (90 mm). The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.8 prior to autoclaving at 121°C for 20 minutes. The callus was maintained by regular sub-culturing at 30 day interval on the same medium and incubated in culture room at 25 ± 2°C under dark conditions. Sub-culture resulted into the formation of friable callus. Friable callus was used for raising cell suspension cultures. Callus (2-3 g fresh weight) was inoculated in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 30 ml of growth medium (MS with 10 μM BAP and 5 μM of IBA). The cultures were kept on shaker set at 100 rpm at 25°C under dark conditions and sub-cultured at 8 day interval. Cell biomass was maintained either on "growth medium" (Table (Table2)2) to get low-shikonins producing system (LSPS) or to "production medium" (M9 medium; Table Table2;2; [44]) to get high-shikonins producing system (HSPS).

Table 2
Composition of growth medium and production medium used for arnebia cell suspension culture.

In order to find out the possible role of MVA versus MEP pathway in shikonins production, different concentrations (50, 100 and 200 μM) of mevinolin (inhibitor of MVA pathway; dissolved in 100% ethanol and later added to the medium) [26] and fosmidomycin (inhibitor of MEP pathway; dissolved in water) [27] was added separately at the time of inoculation of cell biomass to M9 medium. Accordingly, two controls were used. One had equivalent concentration of ethanol as used for dissolving mevinolin (0.2%, 0.4% and 0.8% in respective control of 50, 100 and 200 μM mevinolin), and for other control equal volume of water, as used for dissolving fosmidomycin, was added to the medium. Cell suspension cultures were kept on shaker set at 100 rpm at 25°C under dark conditions. Samples were harvested at day 4 and day 8 of the treatment for shikonins analysis and gene expression studies.

Estimation of total shikonins

The production of shikonins in cell suspension cultures was measured as described by Yazaki et al. [45]. For the purpose, 1 ml medium was aspirated from cell suspension culture and 500 μl of isoamyl alcohol was added followed by gentle shaking for 5 minutes, and allowed to settle till two layers were formed. A portion (200 μl) from the upper oily layer, was pipetted out to which 800 μl of freshly prepared KOH (2.5%) was added followed by gentle shaking for 5 minutes. After a while two layers got separated and the blue colored lower layer (500 μl) was used to record absorbance at 620 nm on a spectrophotometer (SPECORD 200, Analytik Jena, AG, Germany). A calibration curve was prepared using shikonin (Life Technologies, India) as standard.

Cloning of cDNAs involved in the biosynthesis of GPP, PHB and GHB

Degenerate primers were designed (Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1) to clone AeACTH, AeHMGS, AeMVK, AePMVK, AeMVDD, AeGDPS, AeIPPI, AePAL, AeC4H, and Ae4-CL, based upon the conserved regions of corresponding genes reported for different plants. Total RNA was isolated from root tissue of arnebia using Colinmin™ and the iRIS™ system as described earlier [46-48]. RNA was treated with DNase I (amplification grade; Invitrogen, USA) and used for the synthesis of first strand complementary DNA (cDNA) using 0.5 μg oligo-d (T)12-18 primer (Invitrogen, USA) and 200 U Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) in a total volume of 20 μl. Gene was amplified by PCR using 1 μl of cDNA template (prepared using RNA isolated from root tissue), 0.2 μM each of forward and reverse primers, 0.2 mM of dNTPs, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase, and 1× PCR buffer in a final volume of 25 μl. Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1 lists PCR conditions used to amplify the partial cDNAs. Amplified products were ligated into a pGEM®-T Easy vector (Promega, USA) and transformed into DH5α E. coli cells using the standard protocol. The transformed cells were spread on LB-ampicillin (100 μg/ml) plate along with isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal). All the white (transformed) colonies were re-streaked on a fresh ampicillin plate and colony PCR was performed to check the cloning of PCR product. PCR-positive colonies were used for isolation of plasmids using GenElute Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Sigma, USA). Sequencing of both the strands was performed using Big Dye terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing mix (Applied Biosystems, USA) on an automated DNA sequencer (ABI PRISM™ 310 and 3130 xl, Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems, USA) and analyzed by BLAST algorithm at NCBI database.

Sequence of these partial cDNA was used for cloning of full length cDNAs using rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). Primers for RACE of AeHMGR and AePGT were designed using their EST available at NCBI database vide accession number GR881971 and GR882046, respectively. Additional file 9: Supplementary Table S3 lists various primers and PCR conditions used for RACE. The 5'- and 3'- RACE-ready cDNAs were prepared and RACE was performed using SMART™ RACE cDNA Amplification Kit: Clontech, USA). Amplified products were cloned and analysed essentially as described above. Manufacturer's instructions were followed as and when necessary and also various protocols, as detailed in Sambrook et al. [49], were followed.

Bioinformatics analysis

Primers were designed and analyzed using Primer 3 Input (Primer3_www.cgi v.0.2; http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/). Various sequences were aligned using ClustalW2 http://www.ebi.ac.uk/. Homology search was conducted using BLASTN and BLASTX algorithm http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. Deduced amino acid sequence was used to analyse protein families and domains using tools available at PROSITE database at ExPASy Proteomics Server http://ca.expasy.org/, SMART http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/ and NCBI conserved domain search http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/structure/cdd/. SOPMA http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr was used for secondary structure prediction of the deduced protein.

Semi-quantitative gene expression analysis

Complementary DNA was synthesized essentially as described earlier. PCR was carried out using gene specific primers and expression was evaluated at exponential phase of amplification as described earlier [50]. Additional file 10: Supplementary Table S4 lists all the PCR parameters for reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Expression of 26S rRNA was used as internal control to equalize cDNA quantity in various reactions [50]. Gel was viewed on a UV trans-illuminator and captured on gel documentation system (Alpha DigiDoc™, Alpha Innotech, USA). Integrated density value (IDV) of amplicons was calculated by AD-1000 software (Alpha DigiDoc™, Alpha Innotech, USA). The data was used to calculate the relative change in gene expression.

Gene expression in response to mevinolin and fosmidomycin

To study the gene expression in response to mevinolin and fosmidomycin (100 μM; the most effective concentration), RNA was isolated from arnebia cell suspension culture harvested at day 4 and day 8 day of the treatment, along with their respective controls and the expression was studied as described elsewhere.

Kinetics of gene expression and shikonins content in LSPS and HSPS

Cells were harvested at day 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 of transfer into production medium (HSPS). For control, the cells at similar day were harvested from growth medium (LSPS). RNA was isolated and expression analysis was performed by RT-PCR as described earlier. Shikonins content was also estimated on respective days as described elsewhere in the manuscript.

Authors' contributions

RSS carried out the gene cloning, expression analysis, data collection, data analysis and manuscript writing. RKG and PKB participated in gene cloning and expression analysis. AK participated in gene expression analysis. SM and RK were involved in experiments on cell suspension culture and shikonins estimations under the guidance of MS who also contributed in manuscript writing. PSA guided the research on cell suspension culture. SK conceived the study, designed the experiments, analysed the data, drafted and improved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1:

Primer sequences and PCR conditions used in the present work for amplifying the desired gene from arnebia. Degenerate primer sequences and PCR conditions used for amplifying the genes; AeACTH, AeHMGS, AeMVK, AePMVK, AeMVDD, AeGDPS, AeIPPI, AePAL, AeC4H, and Ae4-CL from arnebia.

Additional file 2:

Size of cDNAs (partial, full-length), BLAST analysis and Domain search in deduced amino acid sequences. Size of cDNAs (partial, full-length), BLAST analysis and Domain search in deduced amino acid sequences of cDNAs of AeACTH, AeHMGS, AeHMGR, AeMVK, AePMVK, AeMVDD, AeGDPS, AeIPPI, AePGT, AePAL, AeC4H, and Ae4-CL from arnebia.

Additional file 3:

Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of the genes cloned from arnebia. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of the (a) AeACTH, (b) AeHMGS, (c) AeHMGR, (d) AeMVK, (e) AePMVK, (f) AeMVDD, (g) AeGDPS, (h) AeIPPI, (i) AePGT, (j) AePAL, (k) AeC4H and (l) Ae4-CL. The amino acid sequence is represented by single-letter code under each codon. Start and stop codons are indicated by * and **, respectively. Nucleotides in capital letters represent untranslated regions. 'Poly A' signal is shown in bold and underlined at position for AeACTH (AAATAAAA), AeHMGS (AAATAACT), AeHMGR (TGATAAA), AePMVK (CATTAAAA), AeMVDD (AATAAA), AeIPPI (GAATAAAA), AeGDPS (GAATAAAA), AePGT (AAATAAAT), AeC4H (AAATAATC) and Ae4-CL (ATATAAAA). ('Poly A' signal was searched using HCpolya: Hamming Clustering poly-A prediction in Eukaryotic Genes, http://zeus2.itb.cnr.it/~webgene/wwwHC_polya.html).

Additional file 4:

Sequence alignment (ClustalW2; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/) of the deduced amino acid sequences of arnebia cDNAs. Sequence alignment (ClustalW2; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/) of the deduced amino acid sequences of arnebia cDNAs with the respective reported sequences from other plants: (a) AeACTH (GenBank:AAU95618.1Nicotiana tabacum, GenBank:ABC74567.1Picrorhiza kurrooa, GenBank:AAM00280.1Arabidopsis thaliana, GenBank:AAL18924.1Hevea brasiliensis); (b) AeHMGS (GenBank:ABX55778.1Solanum lycopersicum, GenBank:ACD87446.1Camptotheca acuminate, GenBank:EEF51079.1Ricinus communis, GenBank:AAS46245.1Hevea brasiliensis, GenBank:AAG32923.1Brassica juncea); (c) AeHMGR (GenBank:AAL54878.1Nicotiana tabacum, GenBank:BAA93631.1Solanum tuberosum, GenBank:ABC74565.1Picrorhiza kurrooa, GenBank:ABV25901.1Antirrhinum majus, GenBank:AAD38873.1Oryza sativa, GenBank:AAA33040.1Camptotheca acuminata); (d) AeMVK (GenBank:AAN72115.1Arabidopsis thaliana, GenBank:ABD32397.1Medicago truncatula, GenBank:ABV02026.1Nicotiana langsdorffii x Nicotiana sanderae, GenBank:ACG46416.1Zea mays, GenBank:AAL31086.1Oryza sativa); (e) AePMVK (GenBank:BAD44652.1Arabidopsis thaliana, GenBank:AAL18926.1Hevea brasiliensis, GenBank:CAO63313.1Vitis vinifera, GenBank:ABF95008.1Oryza sativa, GenBank:NP_001149345.1Zea mays); (f) AeMVDD (GenBank:BAF98285.1Hevea brasiliensis, GenBank:XP_002521172.1Ricinus communis, GenBank:NP_566995.1Arabidopsis thaliana, GenBank:ABV02028.1Nicotiana langsdorffii x Nicotiana sanderae, GenBank:ABW87316.1Solanum lycopersicum); (g) AeIPPI (GenBank:BAB40974.1Nicotiana tabacum, GenBank:ABX55779.1Solanum lycopersicum, GenBank:AAQ84167.1Pueraria montana var. lobata, GenBank:AAB94132.1Camptotheca acuminate, GenBank:AAF29973.1Adonis palaestina); (h) AeGDPS (GenBank:AAS82860.1Antirrhinum majus, GenBank:AAF08793.1Mentha x piperita, GenBank:AAW66658.1Picrorhiza kurrooa, GenBank:ACQ90682.1Humulus lupulus, GenBank:AAN01133.1Abies grandis, GenBank:ACA21458.1Picea abies); (i) AePGT (GenBank:NP_849431.1Arabidopsis thaliana, GenBank:ACC91260.1Capsella rubella, GenBank:BAD05721.1Oryza sativa, GenBank:BAB84122.1Lithospermum erythrorhizon); (j) AePAL (GenBank:BAA24929.1Lithospermum erythrorhizon, GenBank:ABG75911.1Nicotiana attenuate, GenBank:ACF17667.1Capsicum annuum, GenBank:BAA95629.1Catharanthus roseus, GenBank:AAU08174.1Camellia sinensis); (k) AeC4H (GenBank:BAB71716.1Lithospermum erythrorhizon, GenBank:ABC69046.1Solanum tuberosum, GenBank:ACF19421.1Capsicum annuum, GenBank:AAT68775.2Camellia sinensis, GenBank:BAF81522.1Brassica rapa, GenBank:AAB58355.1Arabidopsis thaliana) and (l) Ae4-CL (GenBank:BAA08365.1Lithospermum erythrorhizon, GenBank:ACF17632.1Capsicum annuum, GenBank:AAD40664.1Solanum tuberosum, GenBank:BAA07828.1Nicotiana tabacum, GenBank:ACL31667.1Paulownia fortune, GenBank:CAP08784.1Arabidopsis thaliana, GenBank:ABA40922.1Camellia sinensis). Gaps are represented as dashes; asterisks, colons and dots indicate identical amino acid residues, conserved substitutions, and semi-conserved substitutions, respectively.

Additional file 5:

Domain and protein families in the deduced amino acid sequences of arnebia cDNAs. Domain and protein families in the deduced amino acid sequences of AeACTH, AeHMGS, AeHMGR, AeMVK, AePMVK, AeMVDD, AeGDPS, AeIPPI, AePGT, AePAL, AeC4H, and Ae4-CL.

Additional file 6:

Prediction of secondary structure of deduced amino acid sequences. Prediction of secondary structure of deduced amino acid sequences of AeACTH, AeHMGS, AeHMGR, AeMVK, AePMVK, AeMVDD, AeGDPS, AeIPPI, AePGT, AePAL, AeC4H and Ae4-CL by SOPMA. Helices, sheets, turns and coils are indicated by the longest, the second longest, the second shortest and the shortest vertical lines, respectively.

Additional file 7:

Bar diagram indicating intensities (integrated density value; IDV) of the amplicons of Figure Figure2b2b at day 4 and day 8 (panel b) as measured using Alpha DigiDoc 1000 software. Bar diagram indicating intensities (integrated density value; IDV) of the amplicons of Figure Figure2b2b at day 4 and day 8 (panel b) as measured using Alpha DigiDoc 1000 software. Error bar shows standard deviation of three separate values. Since the IDV of separate gels were very different, these were normalized based upon the amplicons for 26 S rRNA.

Additional file 8:

Bar diagram indicating intensities (integrated density value; IDV) of the amplicons of Figure Figure3a3a and and3b3b as measured using Alpha DigiDoc 1000 software. Bar diagram indicating intensities (integrated density value; IDV) of the amplicons of Figure Figure3a3a and and3b3b as measured using Alpha DigiDoc 1000 software. Error bar shows standard deviation of three separate values. Since the IDV of separate gels were very different, these were normalized based upon the amplicons for 26 S rRNA.

Additional file 9:

Primer sequences and PCR conditions used in RACE reactions. Primer sequences and PCR conditions used in RACE reactions for cloning of full-length cDNAs of AeACTH, AeHMGS, AeHMGR, AePMVK, AeMVDD, AeGDPS, AeIPPI, AePGT, AePAL, AeC4H and Ae4-CL.

Additional file 10:

Primer sequences and PCR conditions used in semi-quantitative RT-PCR-based expression analysis. Primer sequences and PCR conditions used in semi-quantitative RT-PCR-based expression analysis of AeACTH, AeHMGS, AeHMGR, AeMVK, AePMVK, AeMVDD, AeGDPS, AeIPPI, AePGT, AePAL, AeC4H, and Ae4-CL in arnebia.

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) India, for funding the present research work under the mission mode project (CMM002) entitled "Developing Cell and Tissue Engineering for Colours and Dyes". RSS thanks University Grant Commission (UGC), India for award of junior/senior research fellowships. PKB and SM thank CSIR for awarding senior research fellowships. AK thanks CSIR for award of junior research fellowship. Technical help provided by Mr. Digvijay Singh and Ms. Anupama Saini in gene sequencing and plasmid isolation is duly acknowledged. The manuscript represents IHBT publication number 2022.

References

  • Kim SH, Kang IC, Yoon TJ. Antitumor activities of a newly synthesized shikonin derivative, 2-hyim-DMNQ-S-33. Cancer Lett. 2001;172:171–175. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00665-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Papageorgiou VP, Andreana N, Assimopoulou E, Couladouros A, Hepworth D, Nicolaou KC. The chemistry and biology of alkannin, shikonin, and related naphthazarin natural products. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 1999;38:270–300. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990201)38:3<270::AID-ANIE270>3.0.CO;2-0. [Cross Ref]
  • Chen X, Yang L, Oppenheim JJ, Howard MZ. Cellular pharmacology studies of shikonin derivatives. Phytother Res. 2002;16:199–209. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1100. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kaith BS, Kaith NS, Chauhan NS. Anti-inflammatory effect of Arnebia euchroma root extracts in rats. J ethnopharm. 1996;55:77–80. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(96)01477-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chauhan NS. Medicinal and aromatic plants of Himachal Pradesh. New Delhi: Indus Publishing Company; 1999.
  • Newman JD, Chappell J. Isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants: carbon partitioning within the cytoplasmic pathway. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1999;34:95–106. doi: 10.1080/10409239991209228. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lichtenthaler HK, Rohmer M, Schwender J. Two independent biochemical pathways for isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and isoprenoid biosynthesis in higher plants. Physiol Plant. 1997;101:643–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01049.x. [Cross Ref]
  • Eisenreich W, Rohdich F, Bacher A. Deoxyxylulose phosphate pathway to terpenoids. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6:78–84. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01812-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Boronat A. Elucidation of the methylerythritol phosphate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria and plastids: A metabolic milestone achieved through genomics. Plant Physiol. 2002;130:1079–1089. doi: 10.1104/pp.007138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nogués I, Brilli F, Loreto F. Dimethylallyl diphosphate and geranyl diphosphate pools of plant species characterized by different isoprenoid emissions. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:721–730. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.073213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sando T, Takaoka C, Mukai Y, Yamashita A, Hattori M, Ogasawara N, Fukusaki E, Kobayashi A. Cloning and characterization of mevalonate pathway genes in a natural rubber producing plant, Hevea brasiliensis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;72:2049–2060. doi: 10.1271/bbb.80165. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Totte N, Charon L, Rohmer M, Compernolle F, Baboeuf I, Geuns JMC. Biosynthesis of the diterpenoid steviol, an entkaurene derivative from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, via the methylerythritol phosphate pathway. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:6407–6410. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)01094-7. [Cross Ref]
  • Heide L, Nishioka N, Fukui H, Tabata M. Enzymatic regulation of shikonin biosynthesis in L. erythrorhizon cell cultures. Phytochem. 1989;28:1873–1877. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97877-4. [Cross Ref]
  • Yazaki K, Kunihisa M, Fujisaki T, Sato F. Geranyl diphosphate: 4-hydroxybenzoate geranyltransferase from L. erythrorhizon. Cloning and characterization of a key enzyme in shikonin biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:6240–6246. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106387200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lange BM, Serving K, Bechthold A, Geide L. Regulatory role of microsomal 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme-A reductase for shikonin biosynthesis in L. erythrorhizon cell suspension cultures. Planta. 1998;204:234–241. doi: 10.1007/s004250050252. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Vollack KU, Bach TJ. Cloning of a cDNA encoding cytosolic acetoacetyl-coenzyme A thiolase from radish by functional expression in Saccharomyces cerevkkie. Plant Physiol. 1996;111:1097–1107. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.4.1097. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nagegowda DA, Bach TJ, Chye ML. Brassica juncea 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA synthase 1: expression and characterization of recombinant wild-type and mutant enzymes. Biochemical J. 2004;383:517–527. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040721. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Learned RM, Fink GR. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase from Arabidopsis thaliana is structurally distinct from the yeast and animal enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:2779–2783. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2779. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lluch MA, Masferrer A, Arr'o M, Boronat A, Ferrer A. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of the mevalonate kinase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Bio. 2000;42:365–376. doi: 10.1023/A:1006325630792. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cordier H, Lacombe C, Karst F, Berge's T. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae mevalonate diphosphate decarboxylase (Erg19p) forms homodimers in vivo, and a single substitution in a structurally conserved region impairs dimerization. Current Microbiol. 1999;38:290–294. doi: 10.1007/PL00006804. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Campbell M, Hahn FM, Poulter CD, Leustek T. Analysis of the isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 1997;36:323–328. doi: 10.1023/A:1005935516274. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ehlting J, Buettner D, Wang Q, Douglas CJ, Somssich IE, Kombrink E. Three 4-coumarate: coenzyme A ligases in Arabidopsis thaliana represent two evolutionarily divergent classes in angiosperms. Plant J. 1999;19:9–20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00491.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cochrane FC, Davin LB, Lewis NG. The Arabidopsis phenylalanine ammonia lyase gene family: kinetic characterization of the four PAL isoforms. Phytochem. 2004;65:1557–1564. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.05.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Burke C, Croteau R. Geranyl diphosphate synthase from Abies grandis: cDNA isolation, functional expression, and characterization. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002;405:130–136. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9861(02)00335-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ro DK, Mah N, Ellis BE, Douglas CJ. Functional characterization and subcellular localization of Poplar (Populus trichocarpa x Populus deltoides) cinnamate 4-hydroxylase. Plant Physiol. 2001;126:317–329. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.1.317. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Alberts AW, Chen J, Kuron G, Hunt V, Huff J, Hoffman C, Rothrock J, Lopez M, Joshua H, Harris E, Patchett A, Monaghan R, Currie S, Stapley E, Albers-Schonbergy G, Hensens O, Hirshfieldt J, Hoogsteent K, Liescht J, Springer J. Mevinolin: A highly potent competitive inhibitor of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and a cholesterol-lowering agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77:3957–3961. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.3957. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schwender J, Muller C, Zeidler J, Lichtenthaler HK. Cloning and heterologous expression of a cDNA encoding 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase of Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 1999;455:140–144. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00849-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gaisser S, Heide L. Inhibition and regulation of shikonin biosynthesis in suspension cultures of L. erythrorhizon. Phytochem. 1996;41:1065–1072. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00633-8. [Cross Ref]
  • Skorupinska-Tudek K, Poznanski J, Wojcik J, Bienkowski T, Szostkiewicz I, Zelman-Femiak M, Bajda A, Chojnacki T, Olszowska O, Grunler J, Meyer O, Rohmer M, Danikiewicz W, Swiezewska E. Contribution of the mevalonate and methylerythritol phosphate pathways to the biosynthesis of dolichols in plants. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:21024–21035. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706069200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kobayashi K, Suzuki M, Tang J. Lovastatin Insensitive 1, a novel pentatricopeptide repeat protein, is a potential regulatory factor of isoprenoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:322–331. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dixon RA, Lamb CJ. In: BV Charlwood, Secondary Products from Plant Tissue Culture. Rhodes MJC, editor. Clarendon Press, Oxford; 1990. Regulation of secondary metabolism at the biochemical and genetic levels; pp. 103–118.
  • Rani A, Singh K, Sood P, Kumar S, Ahuja PS. p-Coumarate: CoA ligase as a key gene in the yield of catechins in tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] Funct Integr Genomics. 2009;9:271–275. doi: 10.1007/s10142-008-0098-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Goldstein JL, DeBose-Boyd RA, Brown MS. Protein sensors for membrane sterols. Cell. 2006;124:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.022. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gray JC. Control of isoprenoid biosynthesis in higher plants. Adv Bot Res. 1987;14:25–91. full_text.
  • Oulmouden A, Karst F. Nucleotide sequence of the ERG12 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding mevalonate kinase. Curr Genet. 1991;19:9–14. doi: 10.1007/BF00362081. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Stermer BA, Bianchini GM, Korth KL. Regulation of HMG-CoA reductase activity in plants. J Lipid Res. 1994;35:1133–1140. [PubMed]
  • Bach TJ, Boronat A, Campos N, Ferrer A, Wollack K-U. In: Biochemistry and Function of Sterols. Parish EJ, Nes WD, editor. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL; 1997. Mevalonate biosynthesis in plants; pp. 135–150.
  • Inouye H, Ueda S, Inoue K, Matsumura H. Biosynthesis of shikonin in callus cultures of Lithospermum erythrorhizon. Phytochem. 1979;18:1301–1308. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(79)83012-5. [Cross Ref]
  • Schmid HV, Zenk MH. p-Hydroxybenzoic acid and mevalonic acid as precursors of the plant naphthaquinone alkannin. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971;44:4151–4155. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)97486-6. [Cross Ref]
  • Yamamura Y, Sahin FP, Nagatsu A, Mizukami H. Molecular cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel apoplastic protein preferentially expressed in a shikonin-producing callus strain of Lithospermum erythrorhizon. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003;44:437–446. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcg057. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Singh K, Kumar S, Rani A, Gulati A, Ahuja PS. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) and catechins (flavan-3-ols) accumulation in tea. Funct Integr Genomics. 2009;9:125–134. doi: 10.1007/s10142-008-0092-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Heide L, Tabata M. Geranylpyrophosphate: p-hydroxybenzoate geranyltransferase activity in extracts of Lithospermum erythrorhizon cell culture. Phytochem. 1987;26:1651–1655. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82263-3. [Cross Ref]
  • Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x. [Cross Ref]
  • Fujita Y, Hara Y, Suga C, Morimoto T. Production of shikonin derivatives by cell suspension cultures of Lithospermum erythrorhizon. Plant Cell Rep. 1981;1:61–61. doi: 10.1007/BF00269273. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yazaki K, Tanaka S, Matsuoka H, Sato F. Stable transformation of Lithospermum erythrorhizon by Agrobacterium rhizogenes and shikonin production of the transformants. Plant Cell Rep. 1998;18:214–219. doi: 10.1007/s002990050559. [Cross Ref]
  • Kawoosa T, Singh H, Kumar A, Sharma SK, Devi K, Dutt S, Vats SK, Sharma M, Ahuja PS, Kumar S. Light and temperature regulated terpene biosynthesis: hepatoprotective monoterpene picroside accumulation in Picrorhiza kurrooa. Funct Integr Genomics. 2010;10:393–404. doi: 10.1007/s10142-009-0152-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ghawana S, Singh K, Riazada J, Rani A, Bhardwaj PK, Kumar S. A method for rapid isolation of RNA and a kit thereof. 2007. (WO 2007/113614)
  • Singh RS, Kumar S. A composition and method for removal of colours and inhibitors from tissues to isolate RNA. 2008. (Patent filed no. 89NF2008/IN)
  • Sambrook K, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989.
  • Singh K, Raizada J, Bhardwaj P, Ghawana S, Rani A, Singh H, Kaul K, Kumar S. 26S rRNA based internal control gene primer pair for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-based quantitative expression studies in diverse plant species. Anal Biochem. 2004;335:330–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2004.08.030. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from BMC Molecular Biology are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Compound
    Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • EST
    EST
    Published EST sequences
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Protein
    Protein
    Published protein sequences
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links
  • Taxonomy
    Taxonomy
    Related taxonomy entry
  • Taxonomy Tree
    Taxonomy Tree

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...