• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2010; 5(11): e14127.
Published online Nov 30, 2010. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0014127
PMCID: PMC2994709

Independent Interactions of Phosphorylated β-Catenin with E-Cadherin at Cell-Cell Contacts and APC at Cell Protrusions

Wenqing Xu, Editor

Abstract

Background

The APC tumour suppressor functions in several cellular processes including the regulation of β-catenin in Wnt signalling and in cell adhesion and migration.

Findings

In this study, we establish that in epithelial cells N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin specifically localises to several subcellular sites including cell-cell contacts and the ends of cell protrusions. N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin associates with E-cadherin at adherens junctions and with APC in cell protrusions. We isolated APC-rich protrusions from stimulated cells and detected β-catenin, GSK3β and CK1α, but not axin. The APC/phospho-β-catenin complex in cell protrusions appears to be distinct from the APC/axin/β-catenin destruction complex. GSK3β phosphorylates the APC-associated population of β-catenin, but not the cell junction population. β-catenin associated with APC is rapidly phosphorylated and dephosphorylated. HGF and wound-induced cell migration promote the localised accumulation of APC and phosphorylated β-catenin at the leading edge of migrating cells. APC siRNA and analysis of colon cancer cell lines show that functional APC is required for localised phospho-β-catenin accumulation in cell protrusions.

Conclusions

We conclude that N-terminal phosphorylation of β-catenin does not necessarily lead to its degradation but instead marks distinct functions, such as cell migration and/or adhesion processes. Localised regulation of APC-phospho-β-catenin complexes may contribute to the tumour suppressor activity of APC.

Introduction

Mutation of the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) gene is responsible for over 80% of colon tumours, and is the first detectable event in colorectal neoplasia [1], [2]. The current paradigm for most colon cancers is that truncation of APC disrupts the regulation of the cellular concentration of β-catenin by proteasome-mediated degradation [3], [4]. The critical step is the phosphorylation of β-catenin at Ser33 and Ser37, within an APC- and axin-containing complex known as the “β-catenin destruction complex”. PhosphoSer33/37-β-catenin comprise a recognition sequence for the βTrCP E3 ligase, resulting in the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of β-catenin [5], [6], [7]. Mutations in β-catenin in a number of tumour types can also prevent its phosphorylation [8]. The failure of the APC-axin-β-catenin destruction complex to phosphorylate β-catenin is proposed to result in the accumulation of β-catenin and subsequent constitutive activation of Wnt/β-catenin-target genes, which are important in gut development and in driving colorectal tumourigenesis [9], [10], [11].

Evidence is accumulating that the mechanism of regulation of different cellular processes by β-catenin is more complex than simply involving the control of total cellular levels of the protein [12], [13], [14]. β-catenin has been proposed to be regulated by changes in its conformation, where different molecular forms act in adhesion or transcription, respectively [14]. β-catenin is also regulated by E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion and tyrosine phosphorylation [13], [15]. For example, phosphorylation of β-catenin at Tyr654 results in its dissociation from E-cadherin [16] and phosphorylation at Tyr142 acts as a switch that disrupts its binding to α-catenin and promotes binding of BCL9-2, a nuclear co-factor, resulting in increased transcription of Wnt-target genes [13].

While several studies using phospho (Ser33/37/41/45)-specific β-catenin antibodies reinforce the concept that N-terminal phosphorylation of β-catenin leads to its degradation [17], [18], recent work implicates N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin in distinct functions, including microtubule regrowth at centrosomes [19] and Wnt5a-induced β-catenin/E-cadherin association that does not lead to β-catenin degradation [20]. More recently, phosphorylation of β-catenin at Ser45 has been reported to be spatially separate from phosphorylation at Ser33/37/41 and appears to be involved in a distinct nuclear function [21]. These studies raise the prospect that N-terminal phosphorylation of β-catenin may not necessarily lead directly to its degradation.

In addition to regulation of β-catenin degradation, APC has been implicated in a range of cellular processes based on interactions with cytoskeletal proteins [22], [23]. Several of these functions are altered by cancer-associated APC mutations [22]. However, little is known about the mechanisms by which the different interactions (and functions) of APC are regulated. Recently, phosphorylated APC and β-catenin were reported at microtubule-dependent clusters and phosphorylated APC proposed to play a role in directional migration independent of β-catenin transcriptional activity or cell-cell adhesion [24]. In the present study, we establish that N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin is localised to distinct subcellular sites in epithelial cells, including Ca2+-dependent cell-cell contacts and with APC in clusters at microtubule ends in cell protrusions. Here, β-catenin associated with APC exists in a complex that is separate from axin and is rapidly phosphorylated and dephosphorylated by a GSK3β-dependent mechanism. Localised phospho-β-catenin/APC clusters accumulate in migrating cells and are lost in colon cancer cells when APC is truncated. The subpopulation of phospho-β-catenin at the microtubule tips appears to play a role in the tumour suppressor function of APC.

Results

β-catenin is phosphorylated at distinct subcellular sites in epithelial cells

To investigate β-catenin phosphorylation, we examined the localisation of β-catenin in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney 3 (MDCK) epithelial cells using two phospho-specific β-catenin antibodies. One antibody was raised against β-catenin phosphorylated on Thr41 and Ser45 [P41/45] and the other was raised against phosphorylation at Ser33, Ser37 and Thr41 [P33/37/41]. We first confirmed that β-catenin is predominantly localised to cell-cell contacts in MDCK epithelial monolayers using a pan β-catenin antibody that recognises all molecular forms of β-catenin [25] (Layton et al, submitted) (Fig. 1A). β-catenin is reported to be phosphorylated first on Ser45 by CK1α which creates a priming site for GSK3β to subsequently phosphorylate Thr41, Ser37 and Ser33 [26], [27]. Despite phosphorylation at Ser33 and Ser37 having the potential to target β-catenin for destruction [6], [28], [29], stable populations of phospho-β-catenin recognised by either P41/45 or P33/37/41 phospho-specific antibodies are found at distinct subcellular sites, including cell-cell junctions, the mitotic cell cytoplasm and discrete clusters (Fig. 1B and C). The P33/37/41-phospho-β-catenin antibodies also detect staining at centrosomes and midbody bridges in mitotic cells and in the nucleus (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast to previous studies [17] phospho-β-catenin was detected in the absence of treatments that block the proteasome.

Figure 1
Populations of phosphorylated β-catenin in epithelial cells.

To test the specificity of P41/45- and P33/37/41-phospho-β-catenin antibodies for the different subpopulations, four control experiments were employed. Firstly, β-catenin was depleted by siRNA (~70% reduction; Fig S1). Immunofluorescent staining by P41/45- and P33/37/41-β-catenin antibodies at cell-cell contacts and in clusters was markedly reduced in β-catenin depleted cells (Fig. 1, D–G), indicating that these populations represent phospho-β-catenin, although the nuclear signal remained, suggesting that it is not specific for phospho-β-catenin. Secondly, competition with phospho-peptides of the same sequence as the antigen used to raise phospho-β-catenin antibodies, competed for detection of distinct subcellular populations by P41/45- and P33/37/41-β-catenin, with only the nuclear signal remaining, again suggesting that the nuclear staining may be non-specific (Fig. S2). Thirdly, phosphorylation of recombinant β-catenin in vitro demonstrates that P41/45 antibodies recognise β-catenin phosphorylated by CK1α alone or CK1α plus GSK3β; P33/37/41 antibodies recognise β-catenin phosphorylated by CK1α plus GSK3β but not by CK1α nor GSK3β alone (Fig. S3). This data confirms that CK1α phosphorylates Ser45 while GSK3β is required for phosphorylation of Thr41, Ser37, Ser33. In addition, phosphorylation of Thr41 by GSK3β is not necessary for recognition by the P41/45 antibody, suggesting that it predominantly recognises phospho-Ser45. Neither antibody recognises unphosphorylated β-catenin (Fig. S3). Finally, neither P41/45- nor P33/37/41-β-catenin antibodies detect β-catenin in interphase LIM2551 colon cancer cells that harbour a mutation resulting in deletion of the epitope for the phospho-β-catenin antibodies (β-catenin residues 5–72 [30]) (Fig. S4A and Fig. S5). We note that the P33/37/41 phospho-β-catenin antibodies also stain centrosomes and mid-body bridges in mitotic LIM2551 cells (Fig. S4B), indicating that the apparent localisation of phospho-β-catenin at centrosomes and concentrated at the mid-body during mitosis [19], [31] (see Fig. 1C, arrowheads) is not specific for phospho-β-catenin.

We examined MDCK and 6 colon cancer cell lines and found that the major band detected by P41/45- and P33/37/41-phospho-β-catenin antibodies co-migrates with β-catenin (Fig. S5). Cells containing mutations in APC (LIM2537 and SW480) have detectable phospho-β-catenin whereas cells containing β-catenin mutations at Ser45 (LIM1899 and HCT116) do not contain phospho-β-catenin recognised by P41/45. However, the P41/45 phospho-β-catenin antibody still recognises T41A β-catenin (LIM1215) further demonstrating that the P41/45 antibody primarily recognises phospho-Ser45 rather than phospho-Thr41. Interestingly, Ser45 mutant β-catenin, which lacks the ability to be ‘primed’ for GSK3β phosphorylation by CK1α, is still recognised by P33/37/41 (Fig. S5), consistent with previous findings [32], underscoring the complexity of β-catenin regulation. As expected, inhibition of GSK3β with LiCl did not show a change in P41/45-β-catenin but does reduce the P33/37/41 signal (Fig. S5). These data suggest that stable populations of N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin are associated with different subcellular sites, and that, in contrast to prevailing models, β-catenin phosphorylation may not only be involved in degradation.

Phosphorylated-β-catenin localised to cell-cell contacts requires cell-cell adhesion

We then examined which proteins are associated with populations of phospho-β-catenin in different subcellular locations. β-catenin phosphorylated at Thr41 and Ser45 (as detected by the P41/45 antibody) is localised to cell-cell contacts with E-cadherin (Fig. 2A). Peripheral P33/37/41-β-catenin staining shows minimal overlap with E-cadherin (Fig. 2B, arrows). The peripheral phospho-β-catenin localisation is similar to partial co-localisation with E-cadherin reported previously [18]. E-cadherin co-precipitates P41/45-β-catenin whereas P33/37/41-β-catenin is not detected in the E-cadherin precipitate (Fig. 2C), suggesting that peripheral P33/37/41-β-catenin may not be associated with cell-cell adhesions. This may be due to low levels of P33/37/41-β-catenin and reflect that only a small proportion of total P33/37/41-phospho-β-catenin may be associated with E-cadherin.

Figure 2
Phosphorylated β-catenin associates with E-cadherin at cell-cell adherens junctions.

We investigated the nature of peripheral phospho-β-catenin further by testing the impact of dissociation of calcium dependent adhesions. Chelation of extracellular calcium disrupts cell-cell contacts (Fig. 2D and E). Significantly, the peripheral populations of both P41/45- and P33/37/41-β-catenin are lost completely, whereas other populations of phospho-β-catenin, notably those in discrete clusters at the ends of cell protrusions, remain (Fig. 2D and E, arrowheads). These results suggest that localisation of phospho-β-catenin to the cell periphery requires intact calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesions. Furthermore, we do not detect axin at the sites of cell contact (Fig. S6), in contrast to Maher et al [18], suggesting that the peripheral, cadherin-associated phospho-β-catenin that we detect is not part of a destruction complex.

Phosphorylated β-catenin localised with APC at microtubule ends does not require cell-cell adhesion

Co-staining with APC reveals that P41/45- and P33/37/41-β-catenin cluster with APC at the ends of microtubules (Fig. 3A and B, arrowheads, β-tubulin co-stain is shown in, Fig. S7). The clusters of P33/37/41-β-catenin staining in Fig. 1C (dashed arrows) are also coincident with APC (not shown). Note that the majority of APC decorates the ends of microtubules at cell protrusions in subconfluent epithelial cells, as previously reported [33].

Figure 3
Phosphorylated β-catenin associates with APC at the ends of microtubules.

Given that the phospho-β-catenin populations localised at cell-cell contacts with E-cadherin and at the ends of microtubules with APC are spatially separate, and that β-catenin binding to APC and E-cadherin is mutually exclusive [34], it is clear that the APC/phospho-β-catenin complex is distinct from the E-cadherin/phospho-β-catenin complex. E-cadherin co-precipitates P41/45-β-catenin but not APC; whereas APC co-precipitates P41/45- and P33/37/41-β-catenin, but not E-cadherin (Fig. 2C). Accordingly, the phospho-β-catenin coincident with APC at cell extensions remains after disruption of calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion (Fig. 3C and D, arrowheads) whereas junctional E-cadherin/phospho-β-catenin is lost. This data suggests that the cell-cell contact population of phospho-β-catenin (predominantly P41/45) is associated with E-cadherin in calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesions and that there is a separate population of phospho-β-catenin associated with APC clustered at the ends of microtubules at cell protrusions.

Isolation of APC-rich protrusions

The distinctive localisation of APC to the ends of microtubules is linked to a role in microtubule stabilisation and cell migration [35], [36]. We focussed on phospho-β-catenin coincident with APC clusters and sought to isolate APC-rich cell protrusions and examine the proteins in APC protein complexes. Cells were plated on a porous 3.0 µm membrane and induced to extend pseudopodial protrusions through the membrane in response to a stimulus [37]. We fractionated these cells into pseudopodia (PS) and cell body (CB) fractions (Fig. 4A). We established that the protrusions that extend past the lower surface of the membrane in response to serum stimulation are enriched for APC (Fig. 4B). In addition, nuclei are not present on the lower surface of the membrane but were detected only in the cell bodies (Fig. 4B). In order to isolate sufficient pseudopodial proteins, cells were plated on the filters at high density. Accordingly, a significant proportion of cells were not able to extend protrusions to the underside of the filter, and some APC clusters at the ends of microtubules are still present on the upper surface of the membrane (Fig. 4B). These findings indicate that although APC is present at the microtubule tips on both the upper and lower surfaces of the filter, extraction of pseudopodia from the lower surface provides a means to biochemically isolate the APC that is concentrated in protrusions.

Figure 4
Isolation of APC from protruding pseduopodia.

We confirmed that APC is present in pseudopodia and cell bodies by immunoblotting isolated CB and PS fractions (Fig. 4C, D). In the absence of serum, little APC, as well as β-tubulin, is detected in the pseudopodia fraction (data not shown), consistent with immunofluorescent staining (Fig. 4B) and indicating that serum is required for pseudopodia formation and/or extension. The isolated pseudopodia fraction contained only low level contamination of proteins exclusive to the cell body. No nuclear staining (DAPI) was apparent in the pseudopodia (Fig. 4B) therefore no nucleoporin, a nuclear membrane protein, should appear in the PS fraction (Fig. 4C, D). The contribution of CB proteins to the PS fraction is therefore defined by the proportion of nucleoporin in the PS (Fig. 4D). Proteins with a greater proportion in the PS versus the CB fraction compared to nucleoporin are therefore enriched in pseudopodia or distributed similarly between the two fractions. Importantly, proteins with a lower proportion in the PS compared to nucleoporin must be excluded from the pseudopodia.

APC/β-catenin in cell protrusions is distinct from the APC/β-catenin/axin complex

A significant proportion of total β-catenin is present in the pseudopodia, together with E-cadherin (Fig. 4C, D). E-cadherin and β-catenin are also detected in the PS fraction by immunofluorescence (not shown). As expected, β-tubulin and actin are also present in pseudopodia (Fig. 4C, D). We next examined proteins shown to associate with APC and β-catenin in the ‘destruction complex’. Consistent with our previous findings [38], only a very small proportion of axin is present in the pseudopodia compared to the cell bodies (less than 4-fold compared to APC, P<0.002), suggesting that any axin:APC complex is spatially separate from APC concentrated in cell protrusions (Fig. 4C, D). Moreover, the proportion of axin in the PS fraction was consistently less than the proportion of nucleoporin in the PS fraction, indicating that any axin detected in this fraction must be due to low level CB contamination of the PS fraction (Fig. 4D). The proportion of APC, β-catenin, GSK3β and CK1α, as well as PP2A (not shown), detected in the PS fraction was consistently greater than that of nucleoporin (Fig. 4C, D), demonstrating that they are genuinely present, although not necessarily enriched in pseudopodia. Thus the APC/β-catenin complex in cell protrusions is distinct from the APC/axin/β-catenin destruction complex.

β-catenin associated with APC at the ends of microtubules is phosphorylated by GSK3β

To test whether the different subpopulations of N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin are GSK3β-dependent, we treated cells with two different GSK3β inhibitors. Both kenpaullone and LiCl treatment results in loss of APC-coincident P33/37/41 β-catenin clusters (Fig. 5A and B) indicating that β-catenin is phosphorylated by GSK3β at this site. Reduction in P33/37/41 β-catenin following kenpaullone and LiCl treatment was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Fig. S8A). P41/45 β-catenin is not affected by GSK3β inhibitors, as expected (Fig. S8B and C). The localisation of P41/45 β-catenin with APC clusters implies that phosphorylation at Ser33, Ser37 and Thr41 by GSK3β does not result in recruitment of β-catenin to APC clusters, but instead that β-catenin resident in these complexes is phosphorylated by GSK3β in situ. Surprisingly, the P33/37/41 β-catenin at cell contacts is not affected by inhibition of GSK3β even after long treatments (Fig. 5A and B) suggesting that GSK3β is not involved in phosphorylating these populations of β-catenin. Both P33/37/41- and P41/45-β-catenin at cell-cell contacts are reduced following treatment with CK1 inhibitor, D4476 (Fig. S8A and B; Fig. S9). The loss of P33/37/41- and P41/45-β-catenin cell contact staining upon CK1 but not GSK3β inhibition (Fig. S9) indicates that CK1, but not GSK3β, is involved in β-catenin phosphorylation at cell-cell adhesions. This implies that either CK1 phosphorylates P33/37/41 localised at the cell periphery or that S45 phosphorylation is required for these sites to be phosphorylated by another priming-dependent kinase. Thus, β-catenin is phosphorylated both by CK1 and GSK3β, but is selectively phosphorylated by different kinases at different sub-cellular sites.

Figure 5
Inhibition of GSK3β results in loss of P33/37/41-β-catenin associated with APC but not other sub-populations.

In astrocytes, GSK3β has been reported to be specifically inactivated in cell protrusions, leading to the association of APC with the plus ends of microtubules [39]. Accumulation of β-catenin at the leading edge in these cells is attributed to the localised inhibition of GSK3β. Although our observations suggest that APC localisation to the ends of microtubules is unaffected by inhibition of GSK3β and that the β-catenin which accumulates with APC is phosphorylated by GSK3β, and is unaffected by degradation, it is possible that these are separate events and that examining total β-catenin masks the phospho-specific events. In addition, the rate of phosphorylation and the incubation period for inhibitors may be crucial. The role of GSK3β is complex and short term LiCl treatment (up to 4 h) has been reported to result in dramatically different effects on β-catenin compared to longer term inhibition (>6 h) (Gottardi and Gumbiner, 2004).

Consequently, we examined the kinetics of GSK3β-dependent phosphorylation of localised β-catenin in lysates from control or LiCl treated cells. Inhibition of GSK3β for one hour results in reduced P33/37/41-β-catenin and this persists for several hours with LiCl treatment before phosphorylation begins to be restored (Fig. 5C). The P33/37/41-β-catenin co-precipitated with APC is also reduced in GSK3β inhibited cells compared to control, whereas total β-catenin is similar in control and treated cells (Fig. 5C). P41/45-β-catenin is not altered in LiCl-treated cells (Fig. 5C and Fig. S8), which suggests that the loss of phospho-β-catenin upon GSK3β-inhibition is not due to protein turnover/degradation. P33/37/41-β-catenin coincident with APC at the ends of microtubules is reduced within 5 min of LiCl treatment and is depleted for several hours (Fig. 5D), consistent with immunoblot analysis of total lysates and APC immunoprecipitates (Fig. 5C). The APC clusters themselves were not affected by Lithium treatment, although the number of clusters per cell was reduced with longer treatments (>6 h) (Fig. 5D). These data show that β-catenin localised with APC at the ends of microtubules is phosphorylated by GSK3β and that inhibition of GSK3β or CK1 does not have a marked effect on APC clusters.

β-catenin associated with APC is phosphorylated and dephosphorylated rapidly

To investigate phosphorylation of β-catenin by GSK3β further, we first inhibited GSK3β by pretreatment with LiCl and then washed out the inhibitor and assessed P33/37/41-β-catenin levels. Consistent with rapid phosphorylation, P33/37/41-β-catenin increases after removal of LiCl from the media (Fig. 5E, Fig. S10A). P33/37/41-β-catenin co-incident with APC is also increased (Fig. S10C (P<0.02)). The rapid loss of phosphorylation upon treatment with LiCl indicates that a phosphatase may directly regulate β-catenin, as suggested in earlier studies [17]. While we observe only modest increases in P33/37/41-β-catenin in total cell lysates upon incubation with phosphatase inhibitors (Fig. S10B), there is a robust increase in the proportion of P33/37/41-β-catenin co-incident with APC (Fig. S10C (P<0.0001)). Interpretation of these experiments is complicated by any direct effects of phosphatase inhibitors and LiCl treatment on the auto-inhibitory Ser9 phosphorylation of GSK3β as has been reported [40], however, these data suggest that the phospho-β-catenin localised at the ends of microtubules is also regulated by phosphatases. Together, these data suggest that phospho-β-catenin observed in clusters at cell protrusions is associated with APC and constantly phosphorylated by GSK3β, and that other subpopulations of phospho-β-catenin at other subcellular sites are likely to be phosphorylated by other kinases.

Phospho-β-catenin localisation is prominent at the ends of microtubules in migrating cells

Given that APC localised to the plus ends of microtubules is implicated in microtubule dynamics and cell migration [36], [41], [42], we examined phospho-β-catenin in cells stimulated to migrate in a scratch wound assay. In subconfluent MDCK cells, APC is localised to the ends of a subset of microtubules, often in cell protrusions ([36], [42], see also Fig. 3B). One to two hours after wound-induced migration, P33/37/41-β-catenin accumulates in clusters at the leading edge of migrating cells (Fig. 6A) where APC also decorates the ends of microtubules (Fig. 6B). Importantly, P33/37/41-β-catenin accumulates with APC at the leading edge of migrating cells (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6
Phospho-β-catenin and APC are localised to the ends of microtubules in migrating cells.

The accumulation of phospho-β-catenin in association with APC in migrating cells prompted us to examine the location of P33/37/41-β-catenin in cells stimulated with HGF. HGF stimulates epithelial cell motility, inducing disruption of cell-cell junctions and subsequent cell scattering [43]. In control cells, P33/37/41-β-catenin is concentrated at the ends of microtubules coincident with APC (Fig. 6C). HGF stimulation results in extended protrusion formation and prominent P33/37/41 β-catenin and APC staining at the ends of microtubules in these protrusions (Fig. 6D). Thus, induction of cell migration promotes the accumulation of phospho-β-catenin and APC at the leading edge. Whether phosphorylation of β-catenin at the ends of microtubules contributes to the process of cell migration or whether this occurs as a result of cell migration remains to be determined. Interestingly, phosphorylation of β-catenin at the microtubule ends in migrating epithelial cells contrasts with that observed in migrating astrocytes where GSK3β is inactivated at the leading edge [39].

Phospho-β-catenin clusters localised to the ends of microtubules is dependent on APC

We then tested whether loss of APC impacts phospho-β-catenin localised to the ends of microtubules by depleting APC with siRNA. Transfection of MDCK cells with siRNAs targeting APC reduces the level of APC (Fig. 7A) and results in loss of detectable P33/37/41-β-catenin clusters at the ends of microtubules (Fig. 7B). Quantification of phospho-β-catenin at microtubule protusions revealed a significant reduction in phospho-β-catenin clusters in APC siRNA treated cells compared to control (P<0.001) (Fig. 7C). E-cadherin staining defines the junctional signal in MDCK colonies and shows that concentrations of P33/37/41-β-catenin coincident with E-cadherin are unaffected in APC siRNA treated cells (Fig. S11, green arrows). Note that these accumulations of P33/37/41 are not coincident with APC.

Figure 7
APC is required for phospho-β-catenin localisation to the ends of microtubules.

To test the significance of APC in phospho-β-catenin localisation at cell extensions, we examined P33/37/41-β-catenin in colon cancer cells containing either intact or mutated APC. LIM2405 cells contain a single intact APC allele and harbour a mutation in the other allele which results in truncation at residue 2198 [30]. LIM2405 cells form loosely adherent colonies with the cells on the outer edges extending prominent protrusions that are decorated at the very ends by APC (Fig. 7D). P33/37/41-β-catenin also accumulates at the ends of these protrusions (Fig. 7D, white arrowheads) and is also frequently found in concentrations immediately before the ends of the extension (Fig. 7D, green arrowheads). SW480 cells contain only truncated APC, and in contrast to cells with intact APC, P33/37/41-β-catenin is not detected at the ends of microtubules, but is instead distributed diffusely throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 7E). Together these data show that intact APC is required for phospho-β-catenin localisation in clusters at the ends of microtubules protrusions.

Discussion

β-catenin is a critical component of cell-cell adhesions, where it forms a dynamic link between E-cadherin and the actin cytoskeleton [44], [45]. It is also a critical component of Wnt signalling, where it functions as a transcriptional activator of target genes that regulate cell proliferation and differentiation [15]. The canonical model of Wnt signalling requires that N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin is targeted for destruction, thus providing a means for regulating the transcriptionally active protein. Our present findings establish that the different subcellular populations of N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin are regulated quite differently and that phosphorylated β-catenin is not always targeted for destruction: 1. Phospho-β-catenin is detected without blocking the proteasome; 2. Mutation of S45 still results in detection of phospho-S33/S37/T41, as previously shown [32]; 3. Distinct subcellular locations of phospho-β-catenin implies participation in different functions; 4. Inhibition of GSK3β reduces the phospho-β-catenin at cell protrusions but does not appear to alter the junctional phospho-β-catenin populations; 5. A core component of the destruction complex, axin, is not present in cell protrusions with APC and is not detected at cell-cell junctions; 6. Accumulation of APC and phospho-β-catenin at the ends of cell protrusions and at the leading edge of migrating cells suggests that this population has an active role in microtubule regulation, cell-cell or cell matrix interactions. Our data suggest that localised phospho-β-catenin has distinct roles in normal epithelial cells (Fig. 8) and that the truncation of APC in many colon cancers would be expected to disturb these functions.

Figure 8
Functionally distinct populations of N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin.

N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin localised to sites of cell-cell contact is associated with E-cadherin and requires intact cell-cell adhesions. Phospho-β-catenin has recently been reported in two separate complexes: one with E-cadherin and the other with components of the destruction complex [18]. Cell-cell adhesion is proposed to influence the activity of the Wnt-signalling pool of β-catenin via a junction-localised phospho-destruction complex [18]. The loss of cell contact phospho-β-catenin that we observe following perturbation of Ca2+-dependent cell adhesion may reflect the increased transcriptionally active β-catenin reported by Maher et al [18]. However, we did not detect any change in the levels of total β-catenin (MCF and JLC, unpublished data), consistent with a recent report that also showed that the proteosomal inhibitor MG132 had little effect on β-catenin phosphorylation or Tcf/Lef-mediated transcription [24]. Significantly, we did not detect other destruction complex components (i.e. axin) at the cell periphery. Our results show that N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin is not exclusively present in the destruction complex. Further, inhibition of GSK3β did not alter the cell-cell adhesion-associated populations of P41/45- or P33/37/41-β-catenin, indicating that this population of P33/37/41-β-catenin is likely to be phosphorylated by another kinase. This contrasts with the recent findings in endothelial cells that inhibition of GSK3β and CK1α results in reduced phospho-β-catenin at cell-cell contacts and in this cell type phospho-β-catenin was not detected in VE-cadherin immunoprecipitates [24]. The loss of cell contact phospho-β-catenin following CK1 inhibition implicates CK1 in the phosphorylation of β-catenin at Ser45 and possibly also Ser33/Ser37/Thr41. Alternatively, CK1 may be required to prime β-catenin at Ser45 for phosphorylation at Ser33/Ser37/Thr41 by another kinase. As recently proposed, phosphorylation at S45 may not only be important for priming β-catenin for subsequent phosphorylation [21]. Although P33/37/41-β-catenin is present at cell contacts in a Ca2+-dependent manner, it does not associate with E-cadherin by immunoprecipiation analysis, supporting the conclusion from Maher et al. [21] that P33/37/41-β-catenin can be uncoupled from P41/45. While tyrosine phosphorylation of β-catenin is reported to reduce E-cadherin-β-catenin association at the membrane [46], the role of N-terminally Ser/Thr phosphorylated β-catenin at the cell junctions remains an open question. Adherens junctions are dynamically modulated [44], [45] and while N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin may not be necessary for stable cell-cell adhesions, it may be required for junction formation [17] or recycling [47]. Interestingly, Wnt5a was recently proposed to promote β-catenin/E-cadherin association via CK1α-mediated phosphorylation of β-catenin at Ser45 but not Ser33 [20] which supports a role for Ser45 phospho-β-catenin in cell adhesion and also raises the possibility that localised phosphorylation at individual sites may lead to distinct functional outcomes.

The striking cytoplasmic distribution of phospho-β-catenin in mitotic cells, particularly for P41/45-β-catenin, suggests a role in cell-cycle regulation. Total β-catenin levels are reported to increase in early S phase and are maximal at G2/M [48], but the increase in the phospho-β-catenin is much more dramatic than any increase in the total β-catenin levels. However, it has been shown that many proteins become highly phosphorylated during M phase [49], therefore it is not yet clear whether N-terminal phosphorylation of this population of β-catenin is functional or whether it is a bystander phosphorylation.

Our discovery that phospho-β-catenin accumulates with APC clusters at the ends of microtubules reveals an unexpected role for β-catenin in conjunction with microtubule-associated APC. APC localisation to the plus ends of growing microtubules is well established [33], [42] and is linked to its role in cell migration, polarization and microtubule stability [23]. While β-catenin and stabilised β-catenin mutants have been reported to be associated with peripheral APC clusters [33], [50], [51], [52], its role at this location is not entirely clear. Conflicting reports have suggested that β-catenin contributes to accumulation of APC at membrane clusters [52] or interferes with APC function [51]. In addition, it is not known whether the multiple complexes that APC participates in exist in concert or as distinct complexes. A recent report indicates that phospho-β-catenin is also localised in clusters at microtubule ends in endothelial cells and that CK1- and GSK3β-mediated phosphorylation of APC, but not β-catenin, appears to promote cell migration in a process that is independent of β-catenin-mediated transcription [24]. Our results support this notion except that in endothelial cells, APC clusters appeared to be linked to the proteasomal degradation of APC and β-catenin [24]. Since we have shown that extending pseudopodia contain APC, but not axin, it is clear that the APC at microtubule extensions is distinct from the axin-APC complex [38], [53] in epithelial cells. Unlike endothelial cells, APC is not present at the lateral membrane in MDCK cells. Furthermore, we have shown that phospho-β-catenin is localised to Ca2+-dependent cell contacts and forms a complex with E-cadherin whereas phospho-β-catenin was not detected in VE-cadherin complexes [24], underscoring the differences between the cell types which may explain the different conclusions.

We propose that the form of N-terminally phosphorylated β-catenin which accumulates with APC at cell extensions is not targeted for degradation but may regulate microtubule-associated APC function. Stabilised β-catenin has previously been implicated in inhibition of APC function in neurite formation and growth [51]. However, we did not detect altered APC at microtubule extensions upon inhibition of β-catenin phosphorylation. Our data suggest that unlike stabilised β-catenin, phospho-β-catenin does not impede APC function at microtubules.

Our experiments show that GSK3β phosphorylates the β-catenin that accumulates with APC at microtubule ends. The action of GSK3β is intriguing. GSK3β phosphorylation of APC is reported to abolish microtubule binding [54] and localised inactivation of GSK3β in migrating astrocytes and neurite extensions leads to accumulation of APC in cell polarisation and axon growth, respectively [39], [55]. In contrast, Wnt-induced GSK3β inactivation in neuronal growth cones, and CK1- and GSK3β-inhibition in endothelial cells, leads to decreased APC at microtubule plus ends [24], [56]. Different levels of GSK3β inhibition are proposed to exert different responses depending on cell context or cell type [14], [56]. We observed reduced phospho-β-catenin associated with APC in epithelial cells within 5 min of GSK3β inhibition, indicating that turnover of phosphorylation at these sites is rapid, and this was maintained during 6 h of treatment. We did not observe changes in APC clusters during this time frame. In contrast, previous reports identified accumulation of APC after 8 h to 24 h treatments [55], [57]. We also show prominent accumulation of phospho-β-catenin with APC at the leading edge of cells stimulated to migrate for 1–2 h indicating that GSK3β phosphorylates β-catenin associated with APC in migrating cells. While depletion of β-catenin did not result in differences in endothelial cell migration upon GSK3β inhibition [24], β-catenin has been strongly implicated in epithelial cell migration [58] and our current results link phospho-β-catenin to APC migration/adhesion processes that are independent of axin and β-catenin degradation. Thus GSK3β is important in regulating APC at microtubules, but is also involved in phosphorylation of β-catenin. As functional APC is required for localised phospho-β-catenin at cell protrusions, this process must also involve APC.

The rapid loss of phospho-β-catenin at the protrusion tips following GSK3β inhibition suggests the presence of a phosphatase, as proposed in an earlier study [17]. PP2A has been linked to β-catenin and the degradation complex [59], [60], [61], where APC has been proposed to protect phosphorylated β-catenin from PP2A dephosphorylation thus enabling it to be ubiquitinated and degraded [62]. Whether APC plays a similar role at microtubule plus ends remains to be determined, but we did detect significant levels of PP2A in isolated pseudopodia (MCF, unpublished) and inhibition of PP2A resulted in increased phospho-β-catenin staining in clusters coincident with APC. Identifying the molecular mechanisms that regulate localised phosphorylation of β-catenin at the microtubules will be an important challenge in the future.

While our data showing that axin is excluded from APC-rich protrusions suggests that phospho-β-catenin is not always targeted for proteasomal-mediated destruction, we cannot rule out a model whereby phosphorylation of β-catenin earmarks the protein for destruction by non-axin-mediated mechanisms. One such scaffold complex, containing presenilin, has previously been implicated in mediating phosphorylation of β-catenin [63]. However, while treatment with proteasome inhibitors increases the levels of phospho-β-catenin co-incident with axin puncta [38], clearly demonstrating regulation of these populations by proteasomal degradation, we observed no similar increase in the levels of the APC-rich protrusions-associated population of phospho-β-catenin due to treatment with proteasome inhibitors. Instead, the population associated with APC is prominent in actively migrating cells, implying that it has an active role in cell migration. Although surprising, our data also shows that kinases other than the CK1α/GSK3β combination can phosphorylate β-catenin, which may result in β-catenin destruction or mark distinct functions, such as in cell migration and/or adhesion processes. It should be noted that the rapid dephosphorylation of β-catenin in the presence of GSK3β inhibitors is also reversed rapidly when the inhibition is removed, suggesting that the β-catenin in the protrusions may not be destroyed.

Overall, our studies implicate phosphorylated β-catenin in cell adhesion and at the ends of APC-associated HGF- and wound healing-induced cell protrusions. The latter process requires functional APC and is perturbed in cancer cells containing mutated APC (Fig. 7). Regulation of localised phospho-β-catenin may contribute to the tumour suppressor activity of APC. Whether accumulation of APC and phospho-β-catenin at the leading edge is controlled by Wnt signalling will require further investigation. We propose that phosphorylation of β-catenin does not only lead to its degradation but provides a level of regulation for β-catenin function in distinct cellular processes. This premise is supported by our recent identification of the formation of a Wnt3a-induced phospho-β-catenin-APC-α-catenin complex that resides close to the plasma membrane and appears to be involved in cell-cell adhesion (Layton et al., submitted). The demonstration of localised phosphorylated forms of β-catenin provides important insight into understanding the complexities of β-catenin signalling in colon cancer.

Materials and Methods

Antibodies

The anti-phospho-β-catenin P41/45 and P33/37/41 antibodies were from Cell Signaling (9565 and 9561, respectively). The APC monoclonal antibody (APC-NT) was raised against amino acids 1–61 of human APC with an N-terminal Flag epitope tag, produced in bacteria (Elliott, Catimel and Faux, unpublished). Commercial antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz (anti-APC (H290) and CK1α), Zymed (axin-1), BD Transduction Laboratories (β-catenin (19920/610153), GSK3β (G22320), E-cadherin, nucleoporin, PP2A), and Sigma (actin, clone AC-40 and β-tubulin, clone 2.1). AlexaFluor-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Molecular Probes and IR Dye-conjugated secondary antibodies were from LiCor Biosciences.

Cell culture and treatments

MDCK cells [64] were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS) (DMEM+10%FCS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Colorectal carcinoma cell lines SW480 [65], HCT116 and LIM cells: LIM2405 [66], LIM2537, LIM1215, LIM1899, LIM2551 [30] were grown in RPMI supplemented with 0.01 µg/ml thioglycerol, 0.025 U/ml insulin, 1 µg/ml hydrocortisone, 10% FCS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin.

For Ca2+ chelation experiments, MDCK cells were serum starved for 24 h and incubated with 4 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2 in DMEM or control DMEM for 2 h. For GSK3β inhibitor experiments, cells were incubated with 2 nM Kenpaullone (Calbiochem) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) control, 30 mM LiCl or 30 mM NaCl, for the indicated times. For inhibition of CK1, cells were incubated with 100 µM D4476 (Calbiochem) diluted as described [67] and 5–10 µM IC261 (Calbiochem) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) control. For inhibitor washout experiments, MDCK cells were pretreated with 30 mM LiCl or NaCl for 30 min, cells were washed 2× and incubated with DMEM+10%FCS for 0, 5, 10 and 20 min. Scratch wound assays were performed by plating MDCK cells on optical glass coverslips. Confluent monolayers were scratched with a plastic tip, washed 2× DMEM and incubated with DMEM +10%FCS. The cells were fixed at 0, 1, 2.5 or 6 h. For HGF stimulation, MDCK cells were serum starved for 24 h and incubated with 2 ng/ml HGF (R and D Systems) for 6 h.

To deplete APC using RNA interference (RNAi), MDCK cells were transfected with small interfering RNA (siRNA) directed against APC with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions using 0.3 µM siRNA targeting canine APC (Ambion) or 0.3 µM non-targeting siRNA. Predesigned Dharmacon siRNA pools targeting β-catenin (CTNNB1, L-003482-00-0005, NM_001904) and non-target control siRNA pools (D-001810-20) were used to deplete β-catenin in MDCK cells. Cells were harvested for immunoblot analysis or fixed for immunofluorescence 48 h after siRNA treatment. The sequences of siRNA oligonucleotides were: siAPC 1: 5′-GGAAUCAACCCUCAAAAGUtt-3′, siAPC 2: 5′-GCACACUGCACUGAGAAUAtt-3′, siAPC 3 5′-GCACACUGCACUGAGAAUAtt-3′ (Ambion).

Confocal fluorescence microscopy

Cells were immunostained as described previously [68] with the indicated primary antibodies. AlexaFluor488-, 546-, 633- and 405-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for immunofluorescence analysis. For peptide competition experiments, P41/45 and P33/37/41 phospho-β-catenin antibodies were preincubated without and with P41/45 and P33/37/41 peptides (Cell Signalling), respectively, for 30 min. For immunostaining with antibodies raised in the same species, cells were first incubated with APC (APC-NT) mouse monoclonal antibodies for 1 hour, washed 3× 0.2%BSA/PBS, incubated with anti-mouse AlexaFluor-546 antibodies for 1 h, and then washed 4×0.2% BSA/PBS before incubating with β-tubulin or E-cadherin mouse monoclonal antibodies for 1 h. Cells were washed 3×0.2% BSA/PBS and incubated with anti-mouse AlexaFluor-405 antibodies for 1 h, washed 3×0.2% BSA/PBS. Cells were co-stained with DAPI or TO-PRO-3 Iodide (642/661 Molecular Probes) to visualise nuclei. Immunofluorescence staining was detected in successive focal planes using Nikon C1 or Olympus FV1000 confocal microscopes. Double- and triple- labelled images were detected using standard filter sets and laser lines. Cells were imaged with Nikon Plan Apo 60× (NA1.4), Nikon TIRF 100× (NA1.45), Olympus 60× (NA1.35) oil or Olympus 60× (NA1.35) water immersion lenses.

Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis

MDCK cells were lysed in ice-cold Lysis Buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH7.4 containing 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Na deoxycholate, 1% Triton-X100, a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (1 mM Na Vanadate, 10 mM NaF, 5 mM Na pyrophosphate, 5 mM β-glyercophosphate, 10 nM okadaic acid), and Complete (Roche) EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail). Lysates were clarified by microcentrifugation at 16,000 g for 30 min at 4°C. For immunoprecipitations, the lysates were incubated with the indicated antibodies (1–2 µg) for 16 h at 4°C and with protein A- or G-Sepharose (10% slurry) (Pharmacia) for the final 30 min 4°C. Precipitated proteins were eluted with 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer and boiled for 10 minutes. Cell lysates and immunoprecipitated proteins were analysed by SDS-PAGE using 3–8% TrisAcetate or 4–12% Bis-Tris NuPAGE gels (Novex). Proteins were detected using the indicated primary antibodies and the Odyssey infrared imaging system (Odyssey). Protein bands were quantitated by densitometry, and analysed using GeneTools software.

Purification of APC-rich protrusions

Pseudopodia were extracted as described by [37]. To monitor APC rich protrusions, serum starved MDCK cells (1×105 or 1×106) were placed in the upper compartment of a chamber (12 or 24 mm, respectively) containing a 3.0-µm porous polycarbonate membrane insert. Cells were allowed to attach for 2 h with 2 ng/ml HGF (R and D Systems), and then inserts placed in chambers containing serum free DMEM or DMEM+10%FCS. Cells were allowed to extend pseudopodia through the pores for 24 h. Pseudopodia (PS) and cell bodies (CB) on the lower- and upper-surface of the filter were immunostained using standard methods, after first removing upper and lower-surface proteins, respectively, as described [37]. Co-staining with DAPI revealed nuclei on the upper surface (cell body) but not the undersurface (pseudopodia).

To extract proteins, 5×105 cells were induced to extend protrusions across the filter. Proteins on the lower-(PS) and upper-(CB) surface of the filter were scraped directly into Lysis Buffer after first removing upper- and lower-surface proteins, respectively, by wiping the surface as described [37]. We typically obtain 20 µg of protein from pseudopodia from each 24 mm well which represents ~5% of total cellular protein, similar to protein amounts reported by [37].

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Reduction of phospho-β-catenin following β-catenin siRNA treatment MDCK cells were treated with siRNA directed against β-catenin or a control sequence. Cells were harvested for immunoblot analysis 72 h after siRNA transfection. Shown is β-catenin immunoblot analysis of 1%Triton, 1% Deoxycholate extracts from control and β-catenin siRNA treated MDCK cells. In β-catenin siRNA treated cells, β-catenin was decreased ~70% (n = 3).

(6.53 MB TIF)

Figure S2

Phospho-β-catenin antibodies are specific. (A) P41/45 β-catenin antibody staining demonstrates cell membrane localisation in the absence but not in the presence of the competing phospho-peptide. MDCK cells were fixed and immunostained with P41/45-β-catenin antibodies preincubated with P41/45-β-catenin blocking peptide. Bottom panels show mitotic cells co-stained with DAPI showing the specific increase in cytoplasmic phospho-β-catenin in mitotic cells. Upper panels are confocal Z projections, lower panels are single confocal sections of immunostained MDCK cells, scale bar 20 µm. (B) P33/37/41 β-catenin antibody staining demonstrates cell membrane (arrow), centrosome (arrowhead), intracellular cluster (dashed arrow) as well as mid-body bridge (not shown), in the absence but not in the presence of the competing phosphopeptide. MDCK cells were fixed and immunostained with P33/37/41 β-catenin antibdies preincubated with P33/37/41 β-catenin blocking peptide. Shown are confocal Z projections of immunostained cells, scale bar 20 µm. Phospho-peptides contain the same sequence as the antigen used to raise phospho-β-catenin antibodies.

(3.77 MB TIF)

Figure S3

Phospho-β-catenin antibodies recognise phosphorylated but not unphosphorylated β-catenin. (A) Immunoblot analysis of purified recombinant wild type β-catenin and S45A -β-catenin phosphorylated with CK1α alone, GSK3β alone and CK1α+GSK3β probed with β-catenin and phospho-β-catenin antibodies, as indicated. P41/45 phospho-β-catenin antibodies recognise β-catenin phosphorylated by CK1α alone and CK1α+GSK3β but not GSKβ alone; P33/37/41 phospho-β-catenin antibodies recognise β-catenin phosphorylated by CK1α+GSK3β but not CK1α or GSK3β alone. S45A β-catenin is not phosphorylated by CK1α and is therefore not recognised by P41/45 or P33/37/41-β-catenin antibodies. Full length mouse β-catenin (residues 1–782, accession number Q02248), subcloned into pET-DUET as an Asc1/Not1 fragment, was expressed in E.coli BL21 (DE3) cells as an N-terminal His6 fusion protein was purified using nickel affinity and size exclusion chromatography. Active CK1α (a kind gift from Dr Jorge Allende) was expressed in E.coli BL21 (DE3) and part-purified as a His6 fusion protein by Ni-affinity chromatography. GSK3β with an N-terminal Flag epitope tag was subcloned into the baculovirus vector pBlueBac4 (Invitrogen) and recombinant protein produced in Sf9 cells. Flag-GSK3β was purified by affinity chromatography using anti-Flag-M2 agarose (Sigma) followed by size exclusion chromatography. 20 pmols purified recombinant His6-β-catenin or His6-β-catenin S45A mutant was phosphorylated in the presence of 1 mM ATP, 4 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 using recombinant His6-CK1α and Flag-GSK3β. Reactions were performed in a final volume of 20 µl at room temperature for 30 min, terminated by the addition of SDS-PAGE loading buffer, and separated by SDS-PAGE (4–12% Bis-Tris). Phosphate incorporation was verified by performing the reaction in the presence of 2 −μCi γ32P-ATP followed by phospho-imaging, or by immunoblot with the indicated antibodies. (B) Autoradiograph of phosphorylated β-catenin from (A) showing incorporation of 32P phosphate followingphosphorylation by CK1α and CK1α+GSK3β but not GSK3β alone.

(1.68 MB TIF)

Figure S4

Specificity of phospho-β-catenin antibodies (A) LIM2551 cells, containing mutated β-catenin that results in deletion of amino acids 5–72 [30], show little to no detectable P41/45 β-catenin and P33/37/41 β-catenin in interphase cells. Shown are confocal sections of LIM2551 cells immunostained with P41/45 β-catenin (top) and P33/37/41 β-catenin (bottom) antibodies and costained with DAPI, scale bar 20 µm. (B) P33/37/41 β-catenin antibodies stain centrosomes and mid-body bridges in mitotic LIM2551 cells. It is important to note that as β-catenin does not contain the P33/37/41 β-catenin epitope, this staining is not related to β-catenin. Shown are confocal micrographs of LIM2551 cells immunostained with P33/37/41 β-catenin and β-tubulin antibodies and co-stained with DAPI to visualise DNA, scale bar 5 µm.

(1.47 MB TIF)

Figure S5

Detection of phosphorylated-β-catenin in colon cancer cells. Immunoblots of MDCK and colon cancer cell lysates demonstrate that the major band detected by P41/45- and P33/37/41-β-catenin antibodies co-migrates with β-catenin. Filters were probed with antibodies to the indicated proteins. Cells containing mutations in APC (LIM2537 and SW480) have detectable phospho-β-catenin. Cells containing β-catenin mutations at S45 (LIM1899 and HCT116) do not have detectable P41/45-β-catenin but are still phosphorylated at P33/37/41. LIM1215 cells contain a mutation at T41. Note that in LIM2551 cells, β-cateninΔ5–72 migrates faster by SDS-PAGE consistent with the size of the mutated protein and is not detected by P41/45 or P33/37/41. Cells treated with 30 mM LiCl do not show any change in P41/45-β-catenin, as expected, but show reduced P33/37/41-β-catenin as detected by P41/45- and P33/37/41-β-catenin antibodies, respectively. Shown are representatives of at least three separate experiments.

(1.98 MB TIF)

Figure S6

Axin is localised to cytoplasmic puncta and not at cell junctions or the ends of cell extensions in MDCK cells. MDCK cells were serum starved and untreated (control (A and C)) or treated with HGF (2 ng/ml) for 6 h (B and D), fixed and immunostained with axin and β-tubulin (A and B) and axin or APC (C and D) antibodies and co-stained with DAPI to visualise nuclei. Left panels are grey scale images of axin; Right panels are merged images, axin (green), β-tubulin/APC (red), nuclei (blue). Axin was not detected at the cell periphery or at the ends of microtubules in control or HGF stimulated cells. Scale bars 20 µm.

(6.25 MB TIF)

Figure S7

Phosphorylated β-catenin is localised in clusters to the ends of microtubules and is coincident with APC. MDCK cells were immunostained with antibodies to P41/45- (A) or P33/37/41-β-catenin (B) (green), APC (magenta) and β-tubulin (blue) and in (B) co-stained with TO-PRO-3 iodide to visualise nuclei (cyan). APC clusters and coincident phospho-β-catenin (white) are indicated with green arrowheads. Note that APC decorates the ends of microtubules; in tight colonies, the cell protrusions are not distinct and extend across the epithelial monolayer so it is sometimes not obvious that the APC clusters are at the ends of microtubules even when cells are costained with tubulin (see A). However, at the edges of colonies, the ends of microtubules are distinct and the APC clusters at cell protrusions are clearly visible.Shown are confocal sections, scale bar 20 µm.

(8.56 MB TIF)

Figure S8

Inhibition of β-catenin phosphorylation in MDCK cells. Lysates from MDCK cells treated with GSK3β and CK1α inhibitors and immunoblotted as indicated. (A) P33/37/41-β-catenin is reduced following treatment with all kinase inhibitors, but most strongly following inhibition with GSK3β inhibitors, LiCl and kenpaullone. (B) P41/45-β-catenin is reduced following treatment with D4476, and reduced slightly with IC261, but not by treatment with GSK3β inhibitors, LiCl and kenpaullone. C) P41/45-β-catenin remains localised in sub-populations at cell junctions (arrows) and in clusters coincident with APC (arrowheads) following treatment with GSK3β inhibitor, LiCl. Scale 10 µm.

(3.21 MB TIF)

Figure S9

Inhibition of CK1 results in loss of phospho-β-catenin at cell-cell contacts. MDCK cells were treated with vehicle control or D4476 (100 µM) for 1 h, fixed and immunostained with antibodies to P41/45 β-catenin or P33/37/41β-catenin (green), APC or E-cadherin (red), and co-stained with DAPI to visualise nuclei. (A) P41/45 β-catenin (green), APC (red), nuclei (blue). (B) P41/45 β-catenin (green), E-cadherin (red), nuclei (blue). (C) P33/37/41 β-catenin (green), APC (red), nuclei (blue). Phospho β-catenin cell contact staining, indicated by solid arrows, is lost in D4476 treated cells but co-incident APC staining, indicated by dashed arrows, and cytoplasmic staining in mitotic cells (*) remains after treatment. Shown are confocal sections, scale bars 20 µm.

(7.60 MB TIF)

Figure S10

Inhibition of protein phosphatases results in an increase in P33/37/41-β-catenin associated with APC. (A) MDCK cells were pre-treated with 30 mM NaCl or LiCl for 30 min, cells were washed 2× and incubated in DME+10% FCS containing vehicle control or okadaic acid (20 nM). Cells were harvested at T0, 5, 10 and 20 min and lysates immunoblotted with P33/37/41-anti rabbit-IR800 and reprobed with actin-anti-mouse-IR700 antibodies. The numbers below each lane reflect normalised densitometry values. Shown is a representative of at least 3 independent experiments. There is a modest increase in phosphorylated (P33/37/41)-β-catenin in the presence of the phosphatase inhibitor. (B) MDCK cells were pre-treated with 30 mM NaCl or LiCl for 30 min and cells were washed 2× and either fixed (T0) or incubated in DME+10%FCS without and with Calyculin (20 nM) for 20 min. Fixed cells were immunostained with P33/37/41-β-catenin (green) and APC (red) antibodies and costained with DAPI. P33/37/41-β-catenin coincident with APC clusters at cell protrusions is reduced with LiCl treament and is partially restored after LiCl is washed out. Incubation with phosphatase inhibitor, Calyculin, results in increased P33/37/41-β-catenin in clusters coincident with APC. Representative fields for each treatment are shown in left panels. Arrowheads indicate APC clusters. Scale bar 20 µm. Cells were scored for coincident P33/37/41-β-catenin and APC staining and plotted in right panel. Shown is average +/− SD from three independent experiments, >100 cells per treatment group. **P<0.02, ***P<0.005, ****P = 0.00005 by Students t test.

(3.08 MB TIF)

Figure S11

APC is required for phospho-β-catenin localisation to the ends of microtubules. MDCK cells transfected with control and APC siRNA were immunostained for P33/37/41 β-catenin (green), APC (magenta) and E-cadherin (blue) with grey scale images shown below and enlarged in insets. Arrowheads indicate clusters of phospho-β-catenin at cell extensions coincident with APC in control but not APC depleted cells. White arrows indicate intact junctional phospho-β-catenin; green arrows indicate concentrations of phospho-β-catenin coincident with E-cadherin. Scale bars 20 µ (insets, 10 µ).

(5.37 MB TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Jorge Allende for providing the CK1α expression construct, Cameron Nowell for expert assistance with fluorescence microscopy, and Francesca Walker and Matthis Ernst for critically reading the manuscript.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: MCF and AWB are supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Program Grant 487922. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Cottrell S, Bicknell D, Kaklamanis L, Bodmer WF. Molecular analysis of APC mutations in familial adenomatous polyposis and sporadic colon carcinomas. Lancet. 1992;340:626–630. [PubMed]
2. Powell SM, Zilz N, Beazer-Barclay Y, Bryan TM, Hamilton SR, et al. APC mutations occur early during colorectal tumorigenesis. Nature. 1992;359:235–237. [PubMed]
3. Giles RH, van Es JH, Clevers H. Caught up in a Wnt storm: Wnt signaling in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1653:1–24. [PubMed]
4. Huang H, He X. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: new (and old) players and new insights. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:119–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Aberle H, Bauer A, Stappert J, Kispert A, Kemler R. beta-catenin is a target for the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Embo J. 1997;16:3797–3804. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Hart M, Concordet JP, Lassot I, Albert I, del los Santos R, et al. The F-box protein beta-TrCP associates with phosphorylated beta-catenin and regulates its activity in the cell. Curr Biol. 1999;9:207–210. [PubMed]
7. Orford K, Crockett C, Jensen JP, Weissman AM, Byers SW. Serine phosphorylation-regulated ubiquitination and degradation of beta-catenin. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:24735–24738. [PubMed]
8. Polakis P. Wnt signaling and cancer. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1837–1851. [PubMed]
9. Fodde R, Smits R, Clevers H. APC, signal transduction and genetic instability in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1:55–67. [PubMed]
10. Clevers H. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell. 2006;127:469–480. [PubMed]
11. Schneikert J, Behrens J. The canonical Wnt signalling pathway and its APC partner in colon cancer development. Gut. 2007;56:417–425. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Brabletz T, Jung A, Reu S, Porzner M, Hlubek F, et al. Variable beta-catenin expression in colorectal cancers indicates tumor progression driven by the tumor environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:10356–10361. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Brembeck FH, Schwarz-Romond T, Bakkers J, Wilhelm S, Hammerschmidt M, et al. Essential role of BCL9-2 in the switch between beta-catenin's adhesive and transcriptional functions. Genes Dev. 2004;18:2225–2230. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Gottardi CJ, Gumbiner BM. Distinct molecular forms of beta-catenin are targeted to adhesive or transcriptional complexes. J Cell Biol. 2004;167:339–349. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Brembeck FH, Rosario M, Birchmeier W. Balancing cell adhesion and Wnt signaling, the key role of beta-catenin. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006;16:51–59. [PubMed]
16. Piedra J, Martinez D, Castano J, Miravet S, Dunach M, et al. Regulation of beta-catenin structure and activity by tyrosine phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:20436–20443. [PubMed]
17. Sadot E, Conacci-Sorrell M, Zhurinsky J, Shnizer D, Lando Z, et al. Regulation of S33/S37 phosphorylated beta-catenin in normal and transformed cells. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:2771–2780. [PubMed]
18. Maher MT, Flozak AS, Stocker AM, Chenn A, Gottardi CJ. Activity of the beta-catenin phosphodestruction complex at cell-cell contacts is enhanced by cadherin-based adhesion. J Cell Biol. 2009;186:219–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Huang P, Senga T, Hamaguchi M. A novel role of phospho-beta-catenin in microtubule regrowth at centrosome. Oncogene. 2007;26:4357–4371. [PubMed]
20. Medrek C, Landberg G, Andersson T, Leandersson K. Wnt-5a-CKI{alpha} signaling promotes {beta}-catenin/E-cadherin complex formation and intercellular adhesion in human breast epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:10968–10979. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Maher MT, Mo R, Flozak AS, Peled ON, Gottardi CJ. Beta-catenin phosphorylated at serine 45 is spatially uncoupled from beta-catenin phosphorylated in the GSK3 domain: implications for signaling. PLoS One. 5:e10184. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Fodde R. The multiple functions of tumour suppressors: it's all in APC. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:190–192. [PubMed]
23. McCartney BM, Nathke IS. Cell regulation by the Apc protein Apc as master regulator of epithelia. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:186–193. [PubMed]
24. Harris ES, Nelson WJ. APC Regulates Endothelial Cell Migration Independent of Roles in {beta}-catenin Signaling and Cell-Cell Adhesion. Mol Biol Cell [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. van Noort M, Meeldijk J, van der Zee R, Destree O, Clevers H. Wnt signaling controls the phosphorylation status of beta-catenin. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:17901–17905. [PubMed]
26. Amit S, Hatzubai A, Birman Y, Andersen JS, Ben-Shushan E, et al. Axin-mediated CKI phosphorylation of beta-catenin at Ser 45: a molecular switch for the Wnt pathway. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1066–1076. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Liu C, Li Y, Semenov M, Han C, Baeg GH, et al. Control of beta-catenin phosphorylation/degradation by a dual-kinase mechanism. Cell. 2002;108:837–847. [PubMed]
28. Kitagawa M, Hatakeyama S, Shirane M, Matsumoto M, Ishida N, et al. An F-box protein, FWD1, mediates ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of beta-catenin. Embo J. 1999;18:2401–2410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Winston JT, Strack P, Beer-Romero P, Chu CY, Elledge SJ, et al. The SCFbeta-TRCP-ubiquitin ligase complex associates specifically with phosphorylated destruction motifs in IkappaBalpha and beta-catenin and stimulates IkappaBalpha ubiquitination in vitro. Genes Dev. 1999;13:270–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Zhang HH, Walker F, Kiflemariam S, Whitehead RH, Williams D, et al. Selective inhibition of proliferation in colorectal carcinoma cell lines expressing mutant APC or activated B-Raf. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:297–307. [PubMed]
31. Hadjihannas MV, Bruckner M, Behrens J. Conductin/axin2 and Wnt signalling regulates centrosome cohesion. EMBO Rep. 11:317–324. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Wang Z, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Phosphorylation of beta-catenin at S33, S37, or T41 can occur in the absence of phosphorylation at T45 in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5234–5235. [PubMed]
33. Nathke IS, Adams CL, Polakis P, Sellin JH, Nelson WJ. The adenomatous polyposis coli tumor suppressor protein localizes to plasma membrane sites involved in active cell migration. J Cell Biol. 1996;134:165–179. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Gottardi CJ, Gumbiner BM. Adhesion signaling: how beta-catenin interacts with its partners. Curr Biol. 2001;11:R792–794. [PubMed]
35. Nathke IS. The adenomatous polyposis coli protein: the Achilles heel of the gut epithelium. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:337–366. [PubMed]
36. Kroboth K, Newton IP, Kita K, Dikovskaya D, Zumbrunn J, et al. Lack of adenomatous polyposis coli protein correlates with a decrease in cell migration and overall changes in microtubule stability. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:910–918. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Cho SY, Klemke RL. Purification of pseudopodia from polarized cells reveals redistribution and activation of Rac through assembly of a CAS/Crk scaffold. J Cell Biol. 2002;156:725–736. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Faux MC, Coates JL, Catimel B, Cody S, Clayton AH, et al. Recruitment of adenomatous polyposis coli and beta-catenin to axin-puncta. Oncogene. 2008;27:5808–5820. [PubMed]
39. Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A. Cdc42 regulates GSK-3beta and adenomatous polyposis coli to control cell polarity. Nature. 2003;421:753–756. [PubMed]
40. Saito Y, Vandenheede JR, Cohen P. The mechanism by which epidermal growth factor inhibits glycogen synthase kinase 3 in A431 cells. Biochem J. 1994;303(Pt 1):27–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Mogensen MM, Tucker JB, Mackie JB, Prescott AR, Nathke IS. The adenomatous polyposis coli protein unambiguously localizes to microtubule plus ends and is involved in establishing parallel arrays of microtubule bundles in highly polarized epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 2002;157:1041–1048. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Kita K, Wittmann T, Nathke IS, Waterman-Storer CM. Adenomatous polyposis coli on microtubule plus ends in cell extensions can promote microtubule net growth with or without EB1. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:2331–2345. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Potempa S, Ridley AJ. Activation of both MAP kinase and phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase by Ras is required for hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor-induced adherens junction disassembly. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9:2185–2200. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Drees F, Pokutta S, Yamada S, Nelson WJ, Weis WI. Alpha-catenin is a molecular switch that binds E-cadherin-beta-catenin and regulates actin-filament assembly. Cell. 2005;123:903–915. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Yamada S, Pokutta S, Drees F, Weis WI, Nelson WJ. Deconstructing the cadherin-catenin-actin complex. Cell. 2005;123:889–901. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Roura S, Miravet S, Piedra J, Garcia de Herreros A, Dunach M. Regulation of E-cadherin/Catenin association by tyrosine phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:36734–36740. [PubMed]
47. Dupre-Crochet S, Figueroa A, Hogan C, Ferber EC, Bialucha CU, et al. Casein kinase 1 is a novel negative regulator of E-cadherin-based cell-cell contacts. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:3804–3816. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Olmeda D, Castel S, Vilaro S, Cano A. Beta-catenin regulation during the cell cycle: implications in G2/M and apoptosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:2844–2860. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Olsen JV, Vermeulen M, Santamaria A, Kumar C, Miller ML, et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci Signal. 3:ra3. [PubMed]
50. Barth AI, Pollack AL, Altschuler Y, Mostov KE, Nelson WJ. NH2-terminal deletion of beta-catenin results in stable colocalization of mutant beta-catenin with adenomatous polyposis coli protein and altered MDCK cell adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1997;136:693–706. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Votin V, Nelson WJ, Barth AI. Neurite outgrowth involves adenomatous polyposis coli protein and beta-catenin. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:5699–5708. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Sharma M, Leung L, Brocardo M, Henderson J, Flegg C, et al. Membrane localization of adenomatous polyposis coli protein at cellular protrusions: targeting sequences and regulation by beta-catenin. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:17140–17149. [PubMed]
53. Nakamura T, Hamada F, Ishidate T, Anai K, Kawahara K, et al. Axin, an inhibitor of the Wnt signalling pathway, interacts with beta-catenin, GSK-3beta and APC and reduces the beta-catenin level. Genes Cells. 1998;3:395–403. [PubMed]
54. Zumbrunn J, Kinoshita K, Hyman AA, Nathke IS. Binding of the adenomatous polyposis coli protein to microtubules increases microtubule stability and is regulated by GSK3 beta phosphorylation. Curr Biol. 2001;11:44–49. [PubMed]
55. Zhou FQ, Zhou J, Dedhar S, Wu YH, Snider WD. NGF-induced axon growth is mediated by localized inactivation of GSK-3beta and functions of the microtubule plus end binding protein APC. Neuron. 2004;42:897–912. [PubMed]
56. Purro SA, Ciani L, Hoyos-Flight M, Stamatakou E, Siomou E, et al. Wnt regulates axon behavior through changes in microtubule growth directionality: a new role for adenomatous polyposis coli. J Neurosci. 2008;28:8644–8654. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Etienne-Manneville S, Manneville JB, Nicholls S, Ferenczi MA, Hall A. Cdc42 and Par6-PKCzeta regulate the spatially localized association of Dlg1 and APC to control cell polarization. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:895–901. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Simpson KJ, Selfors LM, Bui J, Reynolds A, Leake D, et al. Identification of genes that regulate epithelial cell migration using an siRNA screening approach. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:1027–1038. [PubMed]
59. Seeling JM, Miller JR, Gil R, Moon RT, White R, et al. Regulation of beta-catenin signaling by the B56 subunit of protein phosphatase 2A. Science. 1999;283:2089–2091. [PubMed]
60. Willert K, Shibamoto S, Nusse R. Wnt-induced dephosphorylation of axin releases beta-catenin from the axin complex. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1768–1773. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Zhang W, Yang J, Liu Y, Chen X, Yu T, et al. PR55 alpha, a regulatory subunit of PP2A, specifically regulates PP2A-mediated beta-catenin dephosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:22649–22656. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Su Y, Fu C, Ishikawa S, Stella A, Kojima M, et al. APC is essential for targeting phosphorylated beta-catenin to the SCFbeta-TrCP ubiquitin ligase. Mol Cell. 2008;32:652–661. [PubMed]
63. Kang DE, Soriano S, Xia X, Eberhart CG, De Strooper B, et al. Presenilin couples the paired phosphorylation of beta-catenin independent of axin: implications for beta-catenin activation in tumorigenesis. Cell. 2002;110:751–762. [PubMed]
64. Ridley AJ, Comoglio PM, Hall A. Regulation of scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor responses by Ras, Rac, and Rho in MDCK cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:1110–1122. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Leibovitz A, Stinson JC, McCombs WB, 3rd, McCoy CE, Mazur KC, et al. Classification of human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 1976;36:4562–4569. [PubMed]
66. Whitehead RH, Zhang HH, Hayward IP. Retention of tissue-specific phenotype in a panel of colon carcinoma cell lines: relationship to clinical correlates. Immunol Cell Biol. 1992;70(Pt 4):227–236. [PubMed]
67. Rena G, Bain J, Elliott M, Cohen P. D4476, a cell-permeant inhibitor of CK1, suppresses the site-specific phosphorylation and nuclear exclusion of FOXO1a. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:60–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Faux MC, Ross JL, Meeker C, Johns T, Ji H, et al. Restoration of full-length adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) protein in a colon cancer cell line enhances cell adhesion. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:427–439. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...