• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of pnasPNASInfo for AuthorsSubscriptionsAboutThis Article
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep 1989; 86(17): 6666–6670.
PMCID: PMC297906

Exceptional chromosomal mutations in a rodent population are not strongly underdominant.

Abstract

The observation of karyotypic uniformity in most species has led to the widespread belief that selection limits chromosomal change. We report an unprecedented amount of chromosomal variation in a natural population of the South American marsh rat Holochilus brasiliensis. This variation consists of four distinct classes of chromosomal rearrangements: whole-arm translocations, pericentric inversions, variation in the amount of euchromatin, and variation in number and kind of supernumerary (B) chromosomes. Twenty-six karyotypes are present among 42 animals. Observations of the natural population over a 7-year period and breeding experiments with captive animals indicate that heterozygous individuals suffer no detectable reduction in fitness. This is at odds with a central assumption in current models of chromosomal speciation and provides a firm rejection of the view that selection necessarily restricts chromosomal change.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.2M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Images in this article

Click on the image to see a larger version.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • White MJ. Models of speciation. New concepts suggest that the classical sympatric and allopatric models are not the only alternatives. Science. 1968 Mar 8;159(3819):1065–1070. [PubMed]
  • White MJ. Rectangularity, speciation, and chromosome architecture. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;96:75–103. [PubMed]
  • Koop BF, Baker RJ, Genoways HH. Numerous chromosomal polymorphisms in a natural population of rice rats (Oryzomys, Cricetidae). Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1983;35(2):131–135. [PubMed]
  • Searle JB. Meiotic studies of Robertsonian heterozygotes from natural populations of the common shrew, Sorex araneus L. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1986;41(3):154–162. [PubMed]
  • Patton JL. Chromosome studies of certain pocket mice, genus Perognathus (Rodentia: heteromyidae). J Mammal. 1967 Feb;48(1):27–37. [PubMed]
  • Davisson MT, Akeson EC. An improved method for preparing G-banded chromosomes from mouse peripheral blood. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1987;45(2):70–74. [PubMed]
  • EVANS EP, BRECKON G, FORD CE. AN AIR-DRYING METHOD FOR MEIOTIC PREPARATIONS FROM MAMMALIAN TESTES. Cytogenetics. 1964;3:289–294. [PubMed]
  • Capanna E. Robertsonian numerical variation in animal speciation: Mus musculus, an emblematic model. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;96:155–177. [PubMed]
  • Stewart-Scott IA, Bruère AN. Distribution of heterozygous translocations and aneuploid spermatocyte frequency in domestic sheep. J Hered. 1987 Jan-Feb;78(1):37–40. [PubMed]
  • King M. Chromosomal rearrangements, speciation and the theoretical approach. Heredity (Edinb) 1987 Aug;59(Pt 1):1–6. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...