• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of genbioBioMed CentralBiomed Central Web Sitesearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleGenome BiologyJournal Front Page
Genome Biol. 2010; 11(9): R94.
Published online Sep 27, 2010. doi:  10.1186/gb-2010-11-9-r94
PMCID: PMC2965386

Sequence and structure of Brassica rapa chromosome A3

Abstract

Background

The species Brassica rapa includes important vegetable and oil crops. It also serves as an excellent model system to study polyploidy-related genome evolution because of its paleohexaploid ancestry and its close evolutionary relationships with Arabidopsis thaliana and other Brassica species with larger genomes. Therefore, its genome sequence will be used to accelerate both basic research on genome evolution and applied research across the cultivated Brassica species.

Results

We have determined and analyzed the sequence of B. rapa chromosome A3. We obtained 31.9 Mb of sequences, organized into nine contigs, which incorporated 348 overlapping BAC clones. Annotation revealed 7,058 protein-coding genes, with an average gene density of 4.6 kb per gene. Analysis of chromosome collinearity with the A. thaliana genome identified conserved synteny blocks encompassing the whole of the B. rapa chromosome A3 and sections of four A. thaliana chromosomes. The frequency of tandem duplication of genes differed between the conserved genome segments in B. rapa and A. thaliana, indicating differential rates of occurrence/retention of such duplicate copies of genes. Analysis of 'ancestral karyotype' genome building blocks enabled the development of a hypothetical model for the derivation of the B. rapa chromosome A3.

Conclusions

We report the near-complete chromosome sequence from a dicotyledonous crop species. This provides an example of the complexity of genome evolution following polyploidy. The high degree of contiguity afforded by the clone-by-clone approach provides a benchmark for the performance of whole genome shotgun approaches presently being applied in B. rapa and other species with complex genomes.

Background

The Brassicaceae family includes approximately 3,700 species in 338 genera. The species, which include the widely studied Arabidopsis thaliana, have diverse characteristics and many are of agronomic importance as vegetables, condiments, fodder, and oil crops [1]. Economically, Brassica species contribute to approximately 10% of the world's vegetable crop produce and approximately 12% of the worldwide edible oil supplies [2]. The tribe Brassiceae, which is one of 25 tribes in the Brassicaceae, consists of approximately 240 species and contains the genus Brassica. The cultivated Brassica species are B. rapa (which contains the Brassica A genome) and B. oleracea (C genome), which are grown mostly as vegetable cole crops, B. nigra (B genome) as a source of mustard condiment, and oil crops, mainly B. napus (a recently formed allotetraploid containing both A and C genomes), B. juncea (A and B genomes), and B. carinata (B and C genomes) as sources of canola oil. These genome relationships between the three diploid species and their pairwise allopolyploid derivative species have long been known, and are described by 'U's triangle' [3].

B. rapa is a major vegetable or oil crop in Asia and Europe, and has recently become a widely used model for the study of polyploid genome structure and evolution because it has the smallest genome (529 Mb) of the Brassica genus and, like all members of the tribe Brassiceae, has evolved from a hexaploid ancestor [4-6]. Our previous comparative genomic study revealed conserved linkage arrangements and collinear chromosome segments between B. rapa and A. thaliana, which diverged from a common ancestor approximately 13 to 17 million years ago. The B. rapa genome contains triplicated homoeologous counterparts of the corresponding segments of the A. thaliana genome due to triplication of the entire genome (whole genome triplication), which occurred approximately 11 to 12 million years ago [6]. Furthermore, studies in B. napus, which was generated in the last 10,000 years, have demonstrated that overall genome structure is highly conserved compared to its progenitor species, B. rapa and B. oleracea, which diverged approximately 8 million years ago, but significantly diverged relative to A. thaliana at the sequence level [7,8]. Thus, investigation of the B. rapa genome provides substantial opportunities to study the divergence of gene function and genome evolution associated with polyploidy, extensive duplication, and hybridization. In addition, access to a complete and high-resolution B. rapa genome will facilitate research on other Brassica crops with partially sequenced or larger genomes.

Despite the importance of Brassica crops in plant biology and world agriculture, none of the Brassica species have had their genomes fully sequenced. Cytogenetic analyses have showed that the B. rapa genome is organized into ten chromosomes, with genes concentrated in the euchromatic space and centromeric repeat sequences and rDNAs arranged as tandem arrays primarily in the heterochromatin [9,10]. The individual mitotic metaphase chromosome size ranges from 2.1 to 5.6 μm, with a total chromosome length of 32.5 μm [9]. An alternative cytogenetic map based on a pachytene DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) karyogram showed that the mean lengths of ten pachytene chromosomes ranged from 23.7 to 51.3 μm, with a total chromosome length of 385.3 μm [11]. Thus, chromosomes in the meiotic prophase stage are 12 times longer than those in the mitotic metaphase, and display a well-differentiated pattern of bright fluorescent heterochromatin segments. Sequencing of selected BAC clones has confirmed that the gene density in B. rapa is similar to that of A. thaliana in the order of 1 gene per 3 to 4 kb [6]. Each of the gene-rich BAC clones examined so far by FISH (> 100 BACs) was found to be localized to the visible euchromatic region of the genome. Concurrently, a whole-genome shotgun pilot sequencing of B. oleracea with 0.44-fold genome coverage generated sequences enriched in transposable elements [12,13]. Taken together, these data strongly point to a tractable genome organization where the majority of the B. rapa euchromatic space (gene space) can be sequenced in a highly efficient manner by a clone-by-clone strategy. Based on these results, the multinational Brassica rapa Genome Sequencing Project (BrGSP) was launched, with the aim of sequencing the euchromatic arms of all ten chromosomes [14]. The project aimed to initially produce a 'phase 2 (fully oriented and ordered sequence with some small gaps and low quality sequences)' sequence with accessible trace files by shotgun sequencing of clones so that researchers who require complete sequences from a specific region can finish them.

To support genome sequencing, five large-insert BAC libraries of B. rapa ssp. pekinensis cv. Chiifu were constructed, providing approximately 53-fold genome coverage overall [15]. These libraries were constructed using several different restriction endonucleases to cleave genomic DNA (EcoRI, BamHI, HindIII, and Sau3AI). Using these BAC libraries, a total of 260,637 BAC-end sequences (BESs) have been generated from 146,688 BAC clones (approximately 203 Mb) as a collaborative outcome of the multinational BrGSP community. The strategy for clone-by-clone sequencing was to start from defined and genetically/cytogenetically mapped seed BACs and build outward. Initially, a comparative tiling method of mapping BES onto the A. thaliana genome, combined with fingerprint-based physical mapping, along with existing genetic anchoring data provided the basis for selecting seed BAC clones and for creating a draft tiling path [6,16,17]. As a result, 589 BAC clones were sequenced and provided to the BrGSP as 'seed' BACs for chromosome sequencing. Integration of seed BACs with the physical map provided 'gene-rich' contigs spanning approximately 160 Mb. These 'gene-rich' contigs enabled the selection of clones to extend the initial sequence contigs. Here, as the first report of the BrGSP, we describe a detailed analysis of B. rapa chromosome A3, the largest of the ten B. rapa chromosomes, as assessed by both cytogenetic analysis and linkage mapping (length estimated as 140.7 cM). The A3 linkage group also contains numerous collinearity discontinuities (CDs) compared with A. thaliana, a recent study into which [18] revealed greater complexity than originally described for the segmental collinearity of Brassica and Arabidopsis genomes [19,20]. In accordance with the agreed standards of the BrGSP, we aimed to generate phase 2 contiguous sequences for B. rapa chromosome A3. We annotated these sequences for genes and other characteristics, and used the data to analyze genome composition and examine consequential features of polyploidy, such as genome rearrangement.

Results and discussion

General features of chromosome A3

Chromosome A3 is acrocentric, with a heterochromatic upper (short) arm bearing the nucleolar organizer region (NOR) and a euchromatic lower (long) arm (Figure (Figure1a).1a). The NOR comprises a large domain of 45S rDNA repeats and a small fraction of 5S rDNA repeats extending to the centromere. The centromere of chromosome A3 is typically characterized by hybridization of the 176-bp centromeric tandem repeat CentBr2, which resides on only chromosomes A3 and A5 [10]. The euchromatic region of chromosome A3, the lower arm, has been measured as 45.5 μm in pachytene FISH (Figure (Figure1b).1b). The sequence length of the lower arm from centromere to telomere was estimated to be approximately 34 to 35 Mb based on measurement of the average physical length of sequenced contigs (1 μm/755 kb). Chromosome sequencing was initiated using BAC clones that had been anchored onto the lower arm of chromosome A3 by genetic markers. Subsequently, BES and physical mapping of chromosome A3 allowed extension from these initial seed points and completion of the entire lower arm. However, no BAC clones were identified from the upper arm, possibly owing to the lack of appropriate restriction enzyme sites in these regions, the instability of the sequences in Escherichia coli or a complete lack of euchromatic sequences on that arm.

Figure 1
Features of B. rapa chromosome A3. (a) Mitotic metaphase structure of chromosome A3 with FISH signals of 45S (red), 5S (green) rDNAs, and CentBr2 (magenta). (b) Image of DAPI-stained pachytene spread of chromosome A3 showing the heterochromatic NORs of ...

A total of 348 BAC clones were sequenced from the lower arm of chromosome A3 to produce 31.9 Mb of sequences of phase 2 or phase 3 (finished sequences) standard. These were assembled into nine contigs that span 140.7 cM of the genetic map (Figures 1c, d; Figure S1 in Additional file 1). The lower arm sequence starts at the proximal clone KBrH044B01 and terminates at the distal clone KBrF203I22 (Table S1 in Additional file 2). Excluding the gaps at the centromere and telomere, the pachytene spread FISH indicated that eight physical gaps, totaling approximately 2.3 Mb, remain on the pseudochromosome sequence. Despite extensive efforts, no BACs could be identified in those regions. The total length of the lower arm, from centromere to telomere, was therefore calculated to be 34.2 Mb. Thus, the 31.9 Mb of sequences we obtained represents 93% of the lower arm of the chromosome. The sequence and annotation of B. rapa chromosome A3 can be found in GenBank (see Materials and methods).

Characterization of the sequences

The distribution of genes and various repetitive DNA elements along chromosome A3 are depicted in Figure Figure2,2, with details of the content of repetitive sequences provided in Table S2 in Additional file 2. Overall, 11% of the sequenced region in chromosome A3 is composed of repetitive sequences, which are dispersed over the lower arm. The distribution of repetitive sequences along the chromosome was not even, with fewer retrotransposons (long terminal repeats) and DNA transposons towards the distal end. In addition, low complexity repetitive sequences are relatively abundant in the lower arm, indicating B. rapa-specific expansion of repetitive sequences. These are the most frequently occurring class of repetitive elements, accounting for 41% of the total amount of repetitive sequence elements. Other types of repeat do not show obvious clustering except satellite sequences around 22 Mb from the centromere. These sequences have high sequence similarity to a 350-bp AT-rich tandem repeat of B. nigra [21].

Figure 2
Distribution of various repeats and features on chromosome A3. The long arm of chromosome A3 is shown on the x-axis and is numbered from the beginning of contig 1 to the end of contig 9 by joining up the physical gaps. The y-axis represents genes, ESTs, ...

Gene structure and density statistics are shown in Table Table1.1. The overall G+C content of chromosome A3 is 33.8%, which is less than was reported for the euchromatic seed BAC sequences (35.2%) [6] and the entire A. thaliana genome (35.9%) [22]. Gene annotation was carried out using our specialized B. rapa annotation pipeline. This modeled a total of 7,058 protein-coding genes, of which 1,550 have just a single exon. On average, each gene model contains 4.7 exons and is 1,755 bp in length. Consistent with the results of more restricted studies [6], the average length of gene models annotated on chromosome A3 is shorter than those of A. thaliana genes due to reduction in both exon number per gene and exon length. The average gene density is 4,633 bp per gene, which is also lower than in A. thaliana (4,351 bp per gene), indicating a slightly less compact genome organization. The longest gene model, which is predicted to encode a potassium ion transmembrane transporter, consists of 8 exons across 31,311 bp.

Table 1
Statistics of B. rapa chromosome A3

Potential alternative splicing variants, based upon a minimum requirement for three EST matches, was identified for only 2.3% of the gene models. This finding suggests that alternative splicing may be rarer in B. rapa than it is in A. thaliana, where it occurs at a frequency of 16.9% [23]. Additional EST data will enable more precise identification of alternative spliced variants on the B. rapa genome.

We identified 5,825 genes as 'known' based upon EST matches, protein matches, or any detectable domain signatures. The remaining 1,417 predicted genes were assigned as 'unknown' or 'hypothetical'. The functions of 'known' genes were classified according to Gene Ontology (GO) analysis (Figure (Figure3).3). We compared the results of GO-based classification of gene models from chromosome A3 with a similar analysis of gene models from the 65.8 Mb of genome-wide seed BAC sequences [6]. This revealed several categories for which the functional complement of genes on chromosome A3 is atypical of the genome as a whole. For example, it has higher proportions of genes classified as related to 'stress' or 'developmental process' under the GO biological process category compared to the collection of seed BAC sequences (P < 0.0001). In addition, there are differences in terms pertaining to membrane related genes and chloroplast of the GO cellular component category between the two data sets (P < 0.2).

Figure 3
Functional classification of the proteins encoded on chromosome A3 or seed BAC sequences through annotation using Gene Ontology. Assignments are based on the annotations to terms in the GO biological process, cellular component, and molecular function ...

The predicted proteins found on chromosome A3 were categorized into gene families by BLASTP (using a minimum threshold of 50% alignment coverage at a cutoff of E-10). The chromosome contains 384 families of tandemly duplicated genes with 1,262 members, comprising 17.9% of all genes (Figure S2 in Additional file 1). This is lower than found in A. thaliana, which has 27% of genes existing as tandem duplicates in the genome. The most abundant gene family was the protein kinase family, with 249 members, followed by F-box proteins (170 members) and transcription factors (143 members). These families are distributed throughout the chromosome (Figure (Figure4).4). The highest number of tandem duplicates detected at a single site was a cluster of 18 copies of the cysteine-rich receptor-like protein kinase gene family, located around coordinate 7 Mb.

Figure 4
Distribution patterns of the top six gene categories on chromosome A3. Width of the vertical bars is proportional to the number of genes located at that position.

The chromosome contains 164 tRNAs and 3 small nuclear RNAs. The tRNAs are evenly distributed along chromosome A3 except for one region where they cluster. This cluster, at 23.9 Mb, contains 12 tandem tRNAPro genes, which are the most abundant tRNA genes on the chromosome (Figure S3 in Additional file 1). A tRNAPro cluster was previously detected also on A. thaliana chromosome 1 [24]. A computational search coupled with prediction of secondary structure using reported mature microRNA (miRNA) sequences identified 26 miRNA genes, which outnumber the total number of B. rapa (17) recorded in miRBase (release 15.0; April 2010; Table S3 in Additional file 2). Abundant miRNAs on chromosome A3 included miR2111 and miR399. These have been implicated in regulating nutritional balance in B. rapa based upon observation of their induction during phosphate limitation in A. thaliana and rapeseed [25,26].

A sequence similarity search showed that 2.5% of the genes identified on chromosome A3 are of mitochondrial (98 genes) or chloroplast (78 genes) origin. The widespread distribution observed for organellar insertions across the chromosome indicates that mitochondrial and chloroplast gene transfer occurred independently.

Synteny between chromosome A3 and the A. thaliana genome

To investigate detailed syntenic relationships between chromosome A3 and the five chromosomes of A. thaliana, we compared the proteomes predicted from the two genomes using BLASTP analysis (Table S4 in Additional file 2). Approximately 75.4% of the genes of chromosome A3 have similarity to genes in the A. thaliana genome. Figure Figure55 represents a dot matrix plot showing the large-scale blocks of collinearity between the two genomes. The collinearity blocks, identified by the red dots, extend the whole length of chromosome A3 and correspond to parts of four A. thaliana chromosomes (2, 3, 4, and 5) in a mosaic pattern. The collinearity blocks contain 6,551 gene models in B. rapa and 12,783 gene models in A. thaliana. Comparative analysis showed that 79.7% of gene models on chromosome A3 show similarity with counterparts in the collinear A. thaliana genome segments, whereas only 32.4% of A. thaliana genes show similarity with counterparts on chromosome A3. This is indicative of extensive and interspersed gene loss from B. rapa since divergence of the Brassica and Arabidopsis lineages, as described previously [5,27,28]. We found little evidence to support the presence of paralogous segments on chromosome A3 using self-syntenic comparison (Figure S4 in Additional file 1).

Figure 5
Synteny between B. rapa chromosome A3 and the A. thaliana genome. Chromosome correspondence between the genomes is represented by a dot-plot. Each dot represents a reciprocal best BLASTP match between gene pairs at an E value cutoff of < E-20 ...

Recombination and evolution of chromosome A3

Comparison of chromosome sequences between B. rapa chromosome A3 and A. thaliana allows complete mapping of the inferred ancient karyotype (AK) genome building blocks. According to genome mapping of AK blocks on the A. thaliana genome [20,29] and pairwise information for chromosome A3 and A. thaliana genome collinearity blocks, we defined conserved AK genome building blocks with pairwise boundary delineations of each block on the two genomes (Figure (Figure6;6; Table S4 in Additional file 2). The order and boundaries of AK blocks on chromosome A3 were fundamentally similar to those of our previous report using seed BAC sequences [6]. Chromosome A3 is highly rearranged relative to A. thaliana chromosomes and compared with the AK. Overall, 14 blocks derived from 6 AK chromosomes (AK3, AK4, AK5, AK6, AK7, and AK8) were aligned with chromosome A3. All the AK blocks on chromosome A3 were shorter than those on the A. thaliana genome and seven CD regions were found between the blocks, suggesting that a complicated recombination of six AK chromosomes resulted in the emergence of chromosome A3.

Figure 6
Genome building blocks and block boundaries of the ancestral karyotype mapped onto B. rapa chromosome A3. The position of AK genome building blocks in chromosome A3 was defined by a comparison of B. rapa-A. thaliana syntenic relationships and the A. thaliana ...

The combined analysis of AK mapping and identification of CDs on chromosome A3 enable us to hypothesize how parts of this chromosome have evolved from the AK. One hypothetical model for the reconstruction of the chromosome from the AK is presented in Figure Figure7.7. Chromosome A3 appears to have been derived from at least six AK chromosomes that were recombined in the progenitor of B. rapa by genome rearrangements, including inversion, translocation, fusion, and recombination. The detection of sequences from the W block of AK8 at both ends of the AK4 block indicates that there might have been a circular intermediate derived from fusion chromosome AK8/4 that was then integrated into AK6. Rearrangement of the AK seems to have taken place in the B. rapa genome after whole genome triplication, as none of the other chromosomes in the B. rapa genome show a similar arrangement of AK blocks. Furthermore, this study suggests that rearrangement events were involved in reduction of the basic chromosome number of B. rapa to ten. It remains uncertain, however, which group of linked events occurred earlier or later because multiple rounds of polyploidy followed by complex genome recombination yielded the current chromosome structure of B. rapa.

Figure 7
Hypothetical derivation of chromosome A3. Chromosome A3 has originated due to inversion (i), translocation (t), fusion (f), and recombination (r) of six AK chromosomes (AK3, AK4, AK5, AK6, AK7, and AK8). The ancestral chromosomes are presumed to bear ...

Conclusions

Polyploid ancestry greatly complicates efforts to sequence genomes because of the presence of related sequences. Nevertheless, we have successfully sequenced, almost in its entirety, the largest chromosome of B. rapa, A3, using a clone-by-clone strategy. Annotation of the 31.9 Mb of sequences representing the gene space of chromosome A3 resulted in the development of models for 7,058 protein-coding genes and revealed the gene density to be only slightly lower than that observed for the related species A. thaliana, which is considered to have an exceptionally compact genome [22]. Comparative analysis of collinear genome segments with A. thaliana revealed extensive chromosome-wide interspersed gene loss from B. rapa since divergence of the Brassica and Arabidopsis lineages, as described previously only for small genomic regions [5,27,28]. The alignment of genome segments that the whole chromosome sequence permitted, relative to both the A. thaliana genome and the inferred AK of a common progenitor of Brassica and Arabidopsis, enabled the development of a model for the derivation of chromosome A3. The results confirm that the complete genome sequence of B. rapa, provided that it is of an appropriate standard, will have a major impact on comparative genomics and gene discovery in Brassica species.

Materials and methods

Chromosome sequencing

The B. rapa chromosome A3 was sequenced using a clone-by-clone sequencing strategy with a BAC-based physical map framework that was genetically anchored to the B. rapa genome [16]. We sequenced chromosome A3 of B. rapa ssp. pekinensis cultivar Chiifu from 348 overlapping BAC clones. Initially, we isolated seed BAC clones using a comparative BES tiling method and sequenced them by shotgun sequencing [6]. Seed BAC clones were then extended in both directions by searching for sequence identity in the BES database, which was then cross-examined with a physical map constructed using the KBrH, KBrB, and KBrS1 BAC libraries [16]. We also used KBrE and KBrS2 BAC libraries for additional extension and gap filling in particular. We carried out shotgun sequencing of the BAC clones to generate sequence data with eight- to ten-fold coverage of each clone using the ABI3730×l sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). According to the BrGSP [30], the minimal sequence goal was five phase 2 contigs. Individual BACs were assembled from the shotgun sequences using the PHRED/PHRAP [31,32] and the Consed [33] programs. The sequence contig assembly was created based on overlapping sequences using Sequencher (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) program. To evaluate the accuracy of the assembly, alignment of EST unigenes, PCR amplification of the assembled sequences, and sequence comparison with fosmid clone links were performed. Contigs were ordered using sequence tagged site markers mapping to the long arm of the chromosome using VCS and Jangwon linkage maps [15], followed by estimation of non-overlapping gaps between contigs based on the results of FISH experiments. Pseudochromosome sequences were created by connecting sequence contigs with addition of filler sequences according to the estimated gap size; 10 k addition for gap sizes < 100 kb or 100 k addition for gap sizes > 100 kb. All the sequence information has been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology and Information (NCBI) with accession numbers [NCBI:AC189184] to [NCBI:AC241201] (Table S1 in Additional file 2).

Sequence annotation

We carried out gene prediction using our in-house automated gene prediction system [6]. The assembled sequences were masked using RepeatMasker [34] based on a dataset combining the plant repeat element database of The Institute for Genomic Research [35], Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences [36], and our specialized database of B. rapa repetitive sequences. Gene model prediction was performed using EVidenceModeler [37]. Putative exons and open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted ab initio using FGENESH [38], AUGUSTUS [39], GlimmerHMM [40], and SNAP [41] programs with the parameters trained using the B. rapa matrix. Putative gene splits predicted on the unfinished gaps were removed. To predict consensus gene structures, 152,253 B. rapa ESTs plus full-length cDNAs we have generated, A. thaliana coding sequences (release TAIR9), plant transcripts, and plant protein sequences were aligned to the predicted genes using PASA [42] and AAT [43] packages. The predicted genes and evidence sequences were then assembled according to the weight of each evidence type using EVidenceModeler. The highest scoring set of connected exons, introns, and noncoding regions was selected as a consensus gene model. Proteins encoded by gene models were searched against the Pfam database [44] and automatically assigned a putative name based on conserved domain hits or similarity with previously identified proteins. Annotated gene models were also searched against a database of plant transposon-encoded proteins [45]. Predicted proteins with a top match to transposon-encoded proteins were excluded from the annotation and gene counts. Transfer RNAs were identified using tRNAscan-SE [46]. To scan miRNA genes, the nonredundant miRNA sequences in miRBase v15 were mapped using BLASTN (up to two mismatches) [47]. A search of potential precursor structures was performed by extracting the genomic context (400 bp upstream and downstream) surrounding the position of the miRNA sequence predicted and by analyzing those regions with Vienna RNA package [48]. Only the putative pre-miRNA precursors with a folding energy lower than -20 kcal/mol were selected. Organellar insertions were determined using BLASTN with the A. thaliana mitochondrion and the B. rapa chloroplast genome sequence using a cutoff of 95% identity plus 90% coverage.

Comparative genome analysis

Syntenic regions between chromosome A3 of B. rapa and the A. thaliana genome were identified by a proteome comparison based on BLASTP analysis [47]. The entire proteomes of the two genomes were compared, and only the top reciprocal BLASTP matches per chromosome pair were selected (minimum of 50% alignment coverage at a cutoff of < E-20). Chromosome scale synteny blocks were inferred by visual inspection of dot-plots using DiagHunter with parameters as described in the previous reports [6,49]. At least four genes with the same respective orientations in both genomes were required to establish a primary candidate synteny block. To distinguish highly homologous real synteny blocks from false positives due to multiple rounds of polyploidy followed by genome rearrangement, we manually evaluated the degree of gene conservation in all the primary candidate blocks and selected real syntenic regions showing a gene conservation index of greater than 50% (the number of conserved matches divided by the total number of genes in the blocks). Self comparison of chromosome A3 with other chromosomes of the B. rapa genome was also conducted using seed BAC sequences [6].

Abbreviations

AK: ancestral karyotype; BAC: bacterial artificial chromosome; BES: BAC-end sequence; bp: base pair; BrGSP: Brassica rapa Genome Sequencing Project; CD: collinearity discontinuity; DAPI: 4':6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride; EST: expressed sequence tag; FISH: fluorescent in situ hybridization; GO: Gene Ontology; kb: kilobase; miRNA: microRNA; NOR: nucleolar organizer region.

Authors' contributions

JHM conceived the project, designed research, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. SJK designed research, performed the experiments, and analyzed data. JHM, SJK, JAK, MHL, SIL, JKH, THP, SCL, MJL, JYP, JL, TJY, and IYC contributed to shotgun sequencing, sequence assembly, and data acquisition. MJ and JSK performed genetic mapping. YJH and KBL contributed to FISH. YJS and JHH contributed to annotation and database development. YJS, BJK, SB, JYS, MSS, HJY, and BSC analyzed data. SRC, NR, YPL, FF, ND, ES, MT, IB, AGS, IAPP, JB, and DE participated in BAC-end sequencing. HJY and IB participated in manuscript preparation. BSP conceived the project.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1:

Figures S1, S2, S3, and S4. Figure S1: genetic versus physical distance on chromosome A3. The genetic map was constructed using the VCS population. Figure S2: frequency distribution of genes in multigene families with tandem duplicated paralog arrangements. Tandem duplicated paralogs on chromosome A3 were identified using BLASTP analysis with a minimum threshold of 50% alignment coverage at a cutoff of E-10 in a 100-kb window interval. Figure S3: clusters of tRNAPro genes on chromosome A3. The tRNAPro repeat clusters at 23.68 Mb is located on BAC clone KBrH72P15. Figure S4: dot plot of chromosome A3 compared with itself. Each dot in the dot plot represents a reciprocal best BLASTP match between gene pairs at a cutoff value of < E-20. Black dots show the regions of synteny identified by DiagHunter

Additional file 2:

Tables S1, S2, S3, and S4. Table S1: summary of sequence contigs along with constituent BAC associations on minimum tiling path for chromosome A3. Table S2: comparison of repetitive sequences identified on chromosome A3 and seed BAC sequences of B. rapa. Table S3: miRNAs identified on chromosome A3. Table S4: synteny alignment between B. rapa chromosome A3 and the A. thaliana genome along with mapping of AK genome building blocks.

Acknowledgements

We thank the many participants in the Korean Brassica rapa Genome Project and Dr Xiaowu Wang of IVF, China for discussion. This work was supported by the National Academy of Agricultural Science (05-1-12-2-1 and PJ006759) and the BioGreen 21 Program (20050301034438), Rural Development Administration, Korea, the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/E017363), and the Australian Research Council (Projects LP0882095 and LP0883462).

References

  • Beilstein MA, Al-Shehbaz IA, Kellogg EA. Brassicaceae phylogeny and trichome evolution. Am J Bot. 2006;93:607–619. doi: 10.3732/ajb.93.4.607. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Selected vegetable production in leading countries and the world, 1998-2008. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/VGS/Tables/World.pdf
  • UN. Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot. 1935;7:389–452.
  • Johnston JS, Pepper AE, Hall AE, Chen ZJ, Hodnett G, Drabek J, Lopez R, Price HJ. Evolution of genome size in Brassicaceae. Ann Bot. 2005;95:229–235. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci016. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yang TJ, Kim JS, Kwon SJ, Lim KB, Choi BS, Kim JA, Jin M, Park JY, Lim MH, Kim HI, Lim YP, Kang JJ, Hong JH, Kim CB, Bhak J, Bancroft I, Park BS. Sequence-level analysis of the diploidization process in the triplicated FLOWERING LOCUS C region of Brassica rapa. Plant Cell. 2006;18:1339–1347. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.040535. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mun JH, Kwon SJ, Yang TJ, Seol YJ, Jin M, Kim JA, Lim MH, Kim JS, Lee SI, Baek S, Choi BS, Kim DS, Kim N, Yu HJ, Lim KB, Lim YP, Bancroft I, Hahn JH, Park BS. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the Brassica rapa gene space reveals genome shrinkage and differential loss of duplicated genes after whole genome triplication. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R111. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-10-r111. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rana D, van den Boogaart T, O'Neill CM, Hynes L, Bent E, Macpherson L, Park JY, Lim YP, Bancroft I. Conservation of the microstructure of genome segments in Brassica napus and its diploid relatives. Plant J. 2004;40:725–733. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02244.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cheung F, Trick M, Drou N, Lim YP, Park JY, Kwon SJ, Kim JA, Scott R, Pires JC, Paterson AH, Town C, Bancroft I. Comparative analysis between homoeologous genome segments of Brassica napus and its progenitor species reveals extensive sequence-level divergence. Plant Cell. 2009;21:1912–1928. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.060376. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lim KB, de Jong H, Yang TJ, Park JY, Kwon SJ, Kim JS, Lim MH, Kim JA, Jin M, Jin YM, Kim SH, Lim YP, Bang JW, Kim HI, Park BS. Characterization of rDNAs and tandem repeats in the heterochromatin of Brassica rapa. Mol Cells. 2005;19:436–444. [PubMed]
  • Lim KB, Yang TJ, Hwang YJ, Kim JS, Park JY, Kwon SJ, Kim J, Choi BS, Lim MH, Jin M, Kim HI, de Jong H, Bancroft I, Lim YP, Park BS. Characterization of the centromere and peri-centromere retrotransposons in Brassica rapa and their distribution in related Brassica species. Plant J. 2007;49:173–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02952.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Koo DH, Plaha P, Lim YP, Hur Y, Bang JW. A high-resolution karyotype of Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis revealed by pachytene analysis and multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109:1346–1352. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1771-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ayele M, Haas BJ, Kumar N, Wu H, Xiao Y, Van Aken S, Utterback TR, Wortman JR, White OR, Town CD. Whole genome shotgun sequencing of Brassica oleracea and its application to gene discovery and annotation in Arabidopsis. Genome Res. 2005;15:487–495. doi: 10.1101/gr.3176505. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang X, Wessler SR. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the transposable elements in the related species Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:5589–5594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401243101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brassica info. http://www.brassica.info/info/about-mbgp.php
  • The Korea Brassica rapa Genome Project. http://www.brassica-rapa.org/BRGP/index.jsp
  • Mun JH, Kwon SJ, Yang TJ, Kim HS, Choi BS, Baek S, Kim JS, Jin M, Kim JA, Lim MH, Lee SI, Kim HI, Kim H, Lim YP, Park BS. The first generation of a BAC-based physical map of Brassica rapa. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:280. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-280. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kim JS, Chung TY, King GJ, Jin M, Yang TJ, Jin YM, Kim HI, Park BS. A sequence-tagged linkage map of Brassica rapa. Genetics. 2006;174:29–39. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.060152. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Trick M, Kwon SJ, Choi SR, Fraser F, Soumpourou E, Drou N, Wang Z, Lee SY, Yang TJ, Mun JH, Paterson AH, Town CD, Pires JC, Lim YP, Park BS, Bancroft I. Complexity of genome evolution by segmental rearrangement in Brassica rapa revealed by sequence-level analysis. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:539. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-539. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Parkin IA, Gulden SM, Sharpe AG, Lukens L, Trick M, Osborn TC, Lydiate DJ. Segmental structure of the Brassica napus genome based on comparative analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 2005;171:765–781. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.042093. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schranz ME, Lysak MA, Mitchell-Olds T. The ABC's of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:535–542. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gupta V, Jagannathan V, Lakshmikumaran MS. A novel AT-rich tandem repeat of Brassica nigra. Plant Sci. 1990;68:223–229. doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(90)90228-G. [Cross Ref]
  • The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000;408:796–815. doi: 10.1038/35048692. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • The Arabidopsis Information Resource. http://www.arabidopsis.org/portals/genAnnotation
  • Theologis A, Ecker JR, Palm CJ, Federspiel NA, Kaul S, White O, Alonso J, Altafi H, Araujo R, Bowman CL, Brooks SY, Buehler E, Chan A, Chao Q, Chen H, Cheuk RF, Chin CW, Chung MK, Conn L, Conway AB, Conway AR, Creasy TH, Dewar K, Dunn P, Etgu P, Feldblyum TV, Feng J, Fong B, Fujii CY, Gill JE. et al. Sequence and analysis of chromosome 1 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000;408:816–820. doi: 10.1038/35048500. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hsieh LC, Lin SI, Shih AC, Chen JW, Lin WY, Tseng CY, WH L, Chiou TJ. Uncovering small RNA-mediated responses to phosphate deficiency in Arabidopsis by deep sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2009;151:2120–2132. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.147280. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pant BD, Musialak-Lange M, Nuc P, May P, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Walther D, Scheible WR. Identification of nutrient-responsive Arabidopsis and rapeseed microRNAs by comprehensive real-time polymerase chain reaction profiling and small RNA sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:1541–1555. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.139139. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • O'Neill CM, Bancroft I. Comparative physical mapping of segments of the genome of Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra that are homoelogous to sequenced regions of chromosomes 4 and 5 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2000;23:233–243. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00781.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Town CD, Cheung F, Maiti R, Crabtree J, Haas BJ, Wortman JR, Hine EE, Althoff R, Arbogast TS, Tallon LJ, Vigouroux M, Trick M, Bancroft I. Comparative genomics of Brassica oleracea and Arabidopsis thaliana reveal gene loss, fragmentation, and dispersal after polyploidy. Plant Cell. 2006;18:1348–1359. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.041665. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lysak MA, Berr A, Pecinka A, Schmidt R, McBreen K, Schubert I. Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:5224–5229. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510791103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • The Brassica Genome Project. http://brassica.bbsrc.ac.uk/brassica_genome_sequencing_concept.htm
  • Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl M, Green P. Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998;8:175–185. [PubMed]
  • Ewing B, Green P. Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998;8:186–194. [PubMed]
  • Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998;8:195–202. [PubMed]
  • RepeatMasker. http://www.repeatmasker.org/
  • Ouyang S, Buell CR. The TIGR Plant Repeat Databases: a collective resource for the identification of repetitive sequences in plants. Nucleic Acid Res. 2004;32:D360–366. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh099. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences. http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/en/ibis {AU query: please confirm the correct URL for ref.36 as this was not working when checked}
  • Haas BJ, Salzberg SL, Zhu W, Pertea M, Allen JE, Orvis J, White O, Buell CR, Wortman JR. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R7. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • FGENESH. http://www.softberry.com
  • Stanke M, Morgenstern B. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene prediction in eukaryotes that allows user-defined constraints. Nucleic Acid Res. 2005;33:W465–W467. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki458. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Majoros WH, Pertea M, Salzberg SL. TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open-source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:2878–2879. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth315. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Korf I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;5:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Haas BJ, Delcher AL, Mount SM, Wortman JR, Smith RK, Hannick LI, Maiti R, Ronning CM, Rusch DB, Town CD, Salzberg SL, White O. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acid Res. 2003;31:5654–5666. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg770. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Huang X, Adams MD, Zhou H, Kerlavage AR. A tool for analyzing and annotating genomic sequences. Genomics. 1997;46:37–45. doi: 10.1006/geno.1997.4984. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, Durbin R, Etwiller L, Eddy SR, Griffiths-Jones S, Howe KL, Marshall M, Sonnhammer EL. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acid Res. 2002;30:276–280. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.276. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Plant Transposon-encoded Protein Database. ftp://ftp.tigr.org/pub/data/TransposableElements/transposon_db.pep
  • Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for inproved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acid Res. 1997;25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acid Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gruber AR, Lorenz R, Bernhart SH, Neuböck R, Hofacker IL. The Vienna RNA websuite. Nucleic Acid Res. 2008;36:W70–74. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn188. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cannon SB, Kozik A, Chan B, Michelmore R, Young ND. DiagHunter and GenoPix2D: programs for genomic comparisons, large-scale homology discovery and visualization. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R68. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-10-r68. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Genome Biology are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...