• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2010; 5(10): e13548.
Published online Oct 21, 2010. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0013548
PMCID: PMC2958824

New Insights into the Organization, Recombination, Expression and Functional Mechanism of Low Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunit Genes in Bread Wheat

Hany A. El-Shemy, Editor


The bread-making quality of wheat is strongly influenced by multiple low molecular weight glutenin subunit (LMW-GS) proteins expressed in the seeds. However, the organization, recombination and expression of LMW-GS genes and their functional mechanism in bread-making are not well understood. Here we report a systematic molecular analysis of LMW-GS genes located at the orthologous Glu-3 loci (Glu-A3, B3 and D3) of bread wheat using complementary approaches (genome wide characterization of gene members, expression profiling, proteomic analysis). Fourteen unique LMW-GS genes were identified for Xiaoyan 54 (with superior bread-making quality). Molecular mapping and recombination analyses revealed that the three Glu-3 loci of Xiaoyan 54 harbored dissimilar numbers of LMW-GS genes and covered different genetic distances. The number of expressed LMW-GS in the seeds was higher in Xiaoyan 54 than in Jing 411 (with relatively poor bread-making quality). This correlated with the finding of higher numbers of active LMW-GS genes at the A3 and D3 loci in Xiaoyan 54. Association analysis using recombinant inbred lines suggested that positive interactions, conferred by genetic combinations of the Glu-3 locus alleles with more numerous active LMW-GS genes, were generally important for the recombinant progenies to attain high Zeleny sedimentation value (ZSV), an important indicator of bread-making quality. A higher number of active LMW-GS genes tended to lead to a more elevated ZSV, although this tendency was influenced by genetic background. This work provides substantial new insights into the genomic organization and expression of LMW-GS genes, and molecular genetic evidence suggesting that these genes contribute quantitatively to bread-making quality in hexaploid wheat. Our analysis also indicates that selection for high numbers of active LMW-GS genes can be used for improvement of bread-making quality in wheat breeding.


Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L., AABBDD, 2n = 6x  = 42) provides basic staple food for a large proportion of the world population. A wide range of daily food products, such as bread, cakes, noodles and pastas, is prepared using dough that is generated by mixing wheat flour with water. The viscoelastic properties of dough, which are mainly affected by the strength and quantity of gluten, determine its suitability for being processed into different types of food products [1]. Through many decades of genetic and breeding studies, researchers have found that the prolamin seed storage proteins play important roles in determining gluten strength and quantity (and hence the viscoelastic properties of dough and end use qualities) of commercial wheat varieties [2]. The prolamins have been classified into two groups (gliadins and glutenins) according to their solubility in aqueous/alcohol solutions [3]. The gliadins are monomeric proteins, and contribute mainly to dough extensibility [4][6]. By contrast, the glutenins are polymeric proteins, and play a major role in dough elasticity [1]. The glutenins are further divided into high molecular weight subunits (HMW-GS) and low molecular weight subunits (LMW-GS) based on differences in molecular mass [7], [8]. In bread wheat, the genes encoding HMW-GS proteins are located at the orthologous loci Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1, each containing two paralogous genes encoding one x- and one y-type subunit [1]. Through genetic, breeding and transgenic studies, it has been found that the expression of certain subunits (i.e., 1Dx5, 1Ax1, 1Bx7OE) is correlated with superior bread-making quality [9][12]. Specific selections of these subunits in conventional and molecular breeding programs have contributed to the genetic improvement of bread-making quality in worldwide wheat production [7], [13][15].

Compared to HMW-GS proteins, substantially more LMW-GSs are expressed in the grains of bread wheat. The primary structure of a typical LMW-GS is generally composed of a signal peptide (removed from mature protein), a relatively short N-terminal domain, a central repetitive domain, and a C-terminal domain. Based on the first amino acid residue in the mature protein, LMW-GSs have been grouped into three types, LMW-m, LMW-s and LMW-i, which have methionine, serine and isoleucine at the beginning of their mature subunit proteins, respectively [16][18]. The three types of subunits also differ significantly in other important aspects. The molecular mass of LMW-m subunits (30~40 kD) is generally smaller than that of LMW-s proteins (35~45 kD). The primary structure of LMW-i subunits differ from that of LMW-s and LMW-m proteins in lacking the short N-terminal domain [19]. Central to the structure and function of typical LMW-GSs is the presence of a number of conserved cysteine residues in their proteins, but the relative positions of these cysteine residues may vary among different types of subunits [20], [21].

The multiplicity of LMW-GSs and the difficulty in distinguishing LMW-GSs from gliadins in SDS-PAGE have complicated efforts to understand the physical and genetic organization of the chromosomal loci containing LMW-GS genes. It is now generally accepted that the great majority of typical LMW-GSs is encoded by the genes situated at the orthologous Glu-3 loci (Glu-A3, Glu-B3, Glu-D3) on the short arms of group 1 chromosomes (1AS, 1BS and 1DS) [21], [22]. Glu-A3, Glu-B3 and Glu-D3 are closely linked with the Gli-A1, Gli-B1 and Gli-D1 loci, respectively, which encode gliadins [22], [23][25]. Through sequencing bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones derived from the short arms of 1A and 1B of the tetraploid wheat cultivar (cv.) Langdon, Gao et al. [26] provided the first insight into the physical relationships of Glu-3 and Gli-1 genes. In a 265 kb BAC contig derived from the short arm of 1AS, there were five gliadin and gliadin-like genes and two typical LMW-GS genes, and in a 140 kb genomic DNA fragment derived from 1BS, there were eight gliadin genes and one typical LMW-GS gene [26]. The gliadin genes appeared to be closely spaced, whereas the two LMW-GS genes in the sequenced 1AS region were separated from each other by about 100 kb [26]. While studying the Glu-3 locus of Triticum monococcum, which is diploid and possesses a genome homoeologous to the A genome of common wheat, Wicker et al. [27] also found a large intergenic distance between two neighboring LMW-GS genes (approximately 150 kb). Moreover, non-prolamin genes (such as Pm3 analog, LrK10) and non-coding genetic markers (i.e., SFR159, WHS179) occurred in close proximities to LMW-GS genes [26][29]. Together, these observations indicate that the Glu-A3 and B3 loci may be highly complex and their size may be quite large. To date, no sequencing data have been reported for any BAC clones containing genomic DNA from the Glu-D3 locus of wheat (or related Triticeae species). In addition, the numbers of BAC clones sequenced in the reported studies are generally small (less than three [26], [27]), making it difficult to examine the detailed organizational characteristics of LMW-GS genes at the Glu-3 loci. The genetic organization of LMW-GS genes at the othologous Glu-3 loci and their recombination characteristics are also not well understood. Although many investigators have placed Glu-3 markers in linkage maps of group 1 chromosomes constructed using specific genetic populations [30]-[38], generally no information is available on the number and molecular structure of the LMW-GS genes represented by such Glu-3 markers. One study mapped three LMW-GS genes on the short arm of chromosome 1D (1DS) of Aegilops tauschii, the D genome donor of hexaploid wheat [39], [40], and suggested the occurrence of high recombination in the chromosomal region harboring Glu-D3 loci [28]. However, no detailed information is currently available on the recombination characteristics of LMW-GS genes at the Glu-A3 or B3 loci.

Because of the importance of LMW-GS genes in bread-making quality (see below), considerable effort has been devoted to investigate the numbers and characteristics of the LMW-GS genes in different bread wheat varieties. For example, Ikeda et al. [41] found 12 LMW-GS genes (three at Glu-A3, two at Glu-B3, and seven at Glu-D3) in cv. Norin 61 by analyzing PCR products amplified with oligonucleotide primers specific for this group of genes. By analyzing selected BAC clones, Huang and Cloutier [42] identified 12 active and seven inactive LMW-GS genes in cv. Glenlea. Among the 12 active members, nine were assigned to Glu-D3 (GenBank accessions EU189090-EU189098), two to Glu-B3 (EU189088-EU189089), and one to Glu-A3 (EU189087). Consistent with the previous findings [26], [27], a large intergenic distance (about 81 kb) was found between any two neighboring LMW-GS genes in Glenlea. Both studies revealed that Glu-D3 contained more LMW-GS genes than Glu-A3 or Glu-B3. In line with these findings, seven distinct genes encoding LMW-GS proteins were found in an Aegilops tauschii accession [43]. Concomitant to the attempts to find the total number of LMW-GS genes in particular genotypes, another line of research was to identify distinct LMW-GS genes and their haplotypes in large groups of wheat varieties. Using this approach, a total of six active Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes with 12 haplotypes were isolated [44], [45]. The six Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes encode five m- and one s-type subunits. Four active Glu-B3 LMW-GS genes with 17 haplotypes were reported [46]. The four Glu-B3 LMW-GS genes specify one m- and three s-type subunits. One early study identified seven active Glu-A3 LMW-GS alleles (all coding for i-type subunits) [47], but it is still unclear as to how many distinct LMW-GS genes were originally involved. Collectively, the above data indicate that each Glu-3 locus may contain multiple LMW-GS genes with rich allelic variations, but do not provide a complete elucidation of the LMW-GS genes at individual Glu-3 loci in particular wheat genotypes, and do not establish specific correspondence between LMW-GS genes and their protein products accumulated in the seeds.

The function of LMW-GS proteins in controlling end use qualities of wheat grains has been studied in both tetraploid and hexaploid varieties. Pioneering investigations in durum wheat identified a superior LMW-GS allele (LMW-2) conferring improved pasta-making quality [48], [49]. The functional superiority of LMW-2 was mainly associated with the expression of more LMW-GS species from its locus than the contrasting allele [18], [21], [50], [51]. In bread wheat, multiple protein alleles were discovered for each of the three Glu-3 loci based on their differences in electrophoretic mobility in SDS-PAGE [52], and these alleles differed in their effects on certain aspects of bread-making quality [53][55]. However, it is still not clear if the particular allele per se, or the locus in which the examined allele is located, is responsible for observed functional differences. More recent breeding, quantitative genetic, and modeling studies generally found positive contributions of Glu-3 loci to parameters related to dough strength, extensibility and bread-making quality [13], [30], [32][36], [38], [56], [57]. But the molecular genetic mechanisms underlying the functional differences of orthologous or allelic Glu-3 loci are still not well investigated.

From the information presented above, the main objectives of this work were to gain new information on the organization and recombination characteristics of LMW-GS genes at Glu-3 loci, and on the molecular genetic mechanism underlying their function in bread-making quality. To achieve these goals, complementary approaches (gene identification through sequencing selected BAC clones and PCR amplification, transcript profiling, and proteomic analysis) were used to study the LMW-GS genes and their expression in the seeds of bread wheat cultivars Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411, with superior and poor bread-making qualities, respectively [58][60]. The relative genetic positions and recombination characteristics of LMW-GS genes at orthologous Glu-3 loci were studied in Xiaoyan 54. The differential contributions of allelic Glu-3 loci to Zeleny sedimentation value (an indicator of gluten strength and bread volume) were investigated by association analysis using recombinant inbred lines (RILs) developed from a cross between Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411.


Identification and analysis of BAC clones containing LMW-GS genes

A BAC library of Xiaoyan 54 was constructed and subjected to several rounds of PCR screening using primers (Table S1) specific for LMW-GS genes, resulting in the identification of 27 positive BAC clones (Table 1). Pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis revealed that the insert size of these clones ranged from 25 to 140 kb. Southern hybridization on BAC DNA digested with NotI showed that the majority of the analyzed clones yielded one hybridizing band, except for clone D1862-8-2 that showed two positive bands (Figure S1). Similar results were obtained when the hybridization was performed with DNA samples digested with two restriction enzymes (NotI, SalI), although in this case two hybridizing bands were observed for BAC clone B57-6-5 (Figure S1). Collectively, the data indicated that there may be one to two LMW-GS genes in each of the selected BAC clones. This finding is consistent with previous observations on LMW-GS genes in the BAC clones derived from Ae. tauschii [43], the tetraploid wheat cv. Langdon [26], and the bread wheat cv. Glenlea [42].

Table 1
The 14 LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54 isolated by BAC sequencing and PCR amplification, and the main characteristics of subunits deduced from active LMW-GS gene members.

The LMW-GS gene sequences in the positive BACs were amplified by high fidelity PCR with the same primers used in BAC library screening. The resultant PCR products were cloned and sequenced. Based on similarity analysis of the nucleotide sequences, 12 different LMW-GS gene sequences, representing 12 unique LMW-GS genes, were identified from 27 BACs. The suggested names of the 12 genes are given in Table 1. The 27 BAC clones were then assigned to individual group 1 chromosomes (1A, 1B, and 1D) by PCR mapping using genomic DNA samples extracted from the nulli-tetrasomic (NT) lines of group 1 chromosomes of Chinese Spring (CS) and the markers derived from LMW-GS genes or BAC end sequence information (Table S2). The numbers of BAC clones assigned to 1A, 1B and 1D chromosomes were five, six, and 16, respectively (Table 1).

Thirteen BAC clones, likely representing the maximum coverage of Glu-A3 (four clones), Glu-B3 (two clones), and Glu-D3 (seven clones) loci (Table 1), were chosen for DNA sequencing analysis. Twelve BAC clones were completely sequenced. The insert in B57-6-5 was only partially sequenced due to the presence of too many repeat sequences. Examination of BAC sequence data verified the nucleotide sequences of 12 LMW-GS genes (A3-1, A3-2, A3-3, B3-1, B3-2, D3-1, D3-2, D3-3, D3-4, D3-5, D3-6 and D3-7, Table 1) determined initially using PCR amplified fragments (Accession numbers FJ755302, FJ755303, FJ755304, FJ755306, FJ755309, FJ755310, FJ755311, FJ755312, FJ75513, FJ755314, FJ755315, FJ755316 ). In addition, another LMW-GS gene sequence (B3-3, accession number FJ755307) with its coding region interrupted by transposon insertion was found in B57-6-5.

Analysis of LMW-GS genes and their associations with known markers and genes

Sequence analysis revealed that A708-12-2, A1380-8-2 and A1154-1-1 from chromosome 1A were overlapping BACs, which formed a contig (Ctg708, Figure 1A) of ~210 kb and contained A3-2 and A3-3 (Figure 1A). The distance between A3-2 and A3-3 was 67.6 kb. By contrast, BAC clone A1056-11-5, containing A3-1 (Figure 1A), was a singleton. Within Ctg708, A3-2 and A3-3 were each closely associated with marker SFR159 (less than 4 kb between marker and gene). There were two Pm3 disease resistance gene analogs upstream of A3-2 and A3-3 (Figure 1A). WHS179 was present in A1056-11-5, but not found in Ctg708 (Figure 1A). Conceptual translation showed that A3-1 and A3-2 encoded m- and i-type subunits, respectively (Table 1). A3-3 represented an i-type subunit pseudogene because its coding region was disrupted by a premature stop codon (Table 1). The close relationship of SFR159 and the LMW-GS gene in Ctg708 resembled that at the Glu-Am3 locus of T. monococcum [27]. However, there were three LMW-GS genes at Glu-Am3 (TmGlu-A3-1, 2, 3), compared to the two LMW-GS genes in Ctg708. To test if there was another LMW-GS gene located adjacent to Ctg708, a genomic PCR experiment was conducted using primers specific for i-type LMW-GS gene sequences (Table S1). After cloning and sequencing the amplified fragments, a third i-type LMW-GS gene sequence, sharing more than 88% nucleotide identity to A3-2 and A3-3, was identified. This newly identified LMW-GS gene (A3-4, accession number FJ755305) contained an intact ORF, giving rise to an i-type subunit upon conceptual translation (Table 1).

Figure 1
The organizations of LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54 in 13 representative BAC clones.

For the two 1B BAC clones (Table 1), B229-8-7 (containing B3-1) was 124 kb in length, and contained one WHS179 marker but not SFR159 (Figure 1B). Although not fully assembled, B57-6-5 (containing B3-2 and B3-3) carried several non prolamin genes, including one Pm3 analog, two similar TdLRR-1B sequences [26], one ORF for a putative GPI-anchored protein, and one SFR159 marker (Figure 1B). The co-presence of LMW-GS gene, Pm3 analog, TdLRR-1B, SFR159 and GPI-anchored protein ORF in B57-6-5 resembled the structural organization in BAC clone BAC419P13 derived from the Glu-B3 locus of durum wheat [26], except that B57-6-5 possessed two LMW-GS genes and two TdLRR-1B sequences. Based on this similarity, the gene and marker order in B57-6-5 was tentatively arranged as shown in Figure 1B. B3-1 and B3-2 encoded m- and s-type subunits, respectively, whereas B3-3 represented a s-type subunit pseudogene due to transposon insertion in its coding region (Table 1).

For the seven 1D clones subjected to DNA sequencing analysis (Table 1), D78-6-8 and D357-11-6 formed a contig (Ctg357), which was about 128.7 kb and contained D3-1 (Figure 1C). D3-2 and D3-3 were found in D1862-8-4 with a distance of 15.9 kb, whereas D3-4, D3-5, D3-6 and D3-7 were in D510-5-7, D479-7-6, D1126-1-3 and D1220-5-2, respectively (Figure 1C). WHS179 was found in Ctg357, D510-5-7, D479-7-6 and D1220-5-2, whereas SFR159 was present only in D1862-8-4 (Figure 1C). Pm3 analogs were detected in D1862-8-4 and D1126-1-3 (Figure 1C). Among the six Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes with intact ORF, five (D3-1, D3-2, D3-4, D3-6, D3-7) encoded m-type subunits, one (D3-3) specified a s-type subunit, and the remaining one (D3-5) was a m-type subunit pseudogene because of the presence of a premature stop codon in the coding region (Table 1).

Genetic mapping and recombination of LMW-GS genes at Glu-3 loci

A mapping strategy, utilizing the 182 RILs from the Xiaoyan 54× Jing 411 cross, was undertaken to map the 14 LMW-GS genes at Glu-3 loci in Xiaoyan 54. This was facilitated by the development of specific and polymorphic markers for A3-1, A3-2/A3-3/A3-4, B3-1, B3-2/B3-3, D3-1, D3-2/D3-3, D3-4, D3-5, D3-6 or D3-7 (Table S2). A preliminary investigation showed that A3-2, A3-3 and A3-4 were inherited as a single genetic cluster in the 182 RILs (data not shown). A polymorphic marker developed from the A3-2 sequence was therefore used for mapping the location of this cluster. A similar situation occurred for B3-2/B3-3 and D3-2/D3-3. Consequently, the markers derived from the B3-2 and D3-2 sequences were used for investigating the locations of the B3-2/B3-3 and D3-2/D3-3 clusters, respectively. To facilitate the comparisons of our mapping data with those published previously, the positional relationships between the LMW-GS genes isolated in this work and the microsatellite markers previously mapped to the 1AS, 1BS or 1DS chromosome arms were also investigated. A total of 23 markers (seven on 1AS, 11 on 1BS, and five on 1DS), exhibiting polymorphisms between Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411, was mapped along with the different LMW-GS genes (see below).

Among the four LMW-GS genes at Glu-A3, A3-1 was proximal, whereas A3-2/A3-3/A3-4 was distal, to the centromere (Figure 2A). Recombination occurred between A3-1 and the A3-2/A3-3/A3-4 cluster, with an estimated genetic distance of 1.7 cM (Figure 2A). Seven previously reported microsatellite markers were proximal to A3-1 (Figure 2A). The cumulative genetic distance from A3-2/A3-3/A3-4 to Xcfa2158.1 was 38.3 cM.

Figure 2
Relative genetic positions of the LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54 in homoeologous group 1 chromosomes.

Among the three LMW-GS genes at Glu-B3, B3-1 was more proximal to the centromere than the B3-2/B3-3 cluster (Figure 2B). The estimated genetic distance between B3-1 and B3-2/B3-3 was 0.6 cM. Three previously described Xswes markers were more distal to the centromere than B3-2/B3-3 (Figure 2B). Another set of eight published microsatellite markers were assigned to locations proximal to B3-1 (Figure 2B). The total genetic distance covered from B3-2/B3-3 to Xgwm273.3 was 64.9 cM (Figure 2B).

For the seven LMW-GS genes at Glu-D3, D3-1 was proximal to other six members. No recombination was detected between D3-6 and D3-7 (Figure 2C). By contrast, recombinations occurred between D3-1 and D3-2/D3-3, D3-2/D3-3 and D3-4, D3-4 and D3-5, or D3-5 and D3-6, with the calculated genetic distances ranging from 0.3 to 2.7 cM (Figure 2C). In total, the seven LMW-GS genes at Glu-D3 covered 4.9 cM. Five previously reported microsatellite markers were mapped to locations proximal to D3-1, and covering a total genetic distance of 42.8 cM extending from D3-6/D3-7 to Xcfd61.1 (Figure 2C).

A comparison of the data displayed in Figures 1 and and22 reveal that the WHS179 marker is present in all three genes (A3-1, B3-1, D3-1) located closest to the centromere. This is consistent with the previous finding showing that, on the short arm of group 1 chromosomes, WHS179 is proximal to SFR159 [29]. The D3-4 and D3-5 genes, which were accompanied by WHS179 but not LrK10 (Figure 1C), were mapped to a location more distal than D3-1 which is associated with both WHS179 and LrK10 (Figure 2C). This agrees with the observation made by Spielmeyer et al. [28], indicating that there are at least two WHS179 markers on the short arm of chromosome 1D in Ae. tauschii, with the one proximal to the centromere being associated with LrK10 [28].

Primary structure analysis and comparisons with published LMW-GS genes

Our results showed that the LMW-GS gene family in Xiaoyan 54 was composed of at least 14 distinct members. Except for A3-3, B3-3 and D3-5, 11 members possessed intact ORF, coding for two i-type, seven m-type, and two s-type subunits, respectively (Table 1). The molecular mass of the deduced subunits varied from 33,655.2 to 45,054.7 Da (Table 1). Amino acid sequence comparisons showed that the primary structure of the deduced subunits generally resembled that described previously for typical i-, m- or s-type LMW-GS proteins (Figure S2). All 11 deduced subunits had intact repetitive and C-terminal domains (Figure S2), although the number of repeat units differed among the members (Table 1). Furthermore, eight cysteine residues were present in each of the 11 deduced proteins (Figure S2). A3-1, predicted to encode a m-type subunit with a putative N-terminal domain sequence MDTSCIPGLERPW, was located at Glu-A3 (Table 1, Figures 2A and S2).

The 14 LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54 were compared mainly to the seven Glu-A3 alleles (Glu-A3a to Glu-A3g) reported by Zhang et al. [47], the four Glu-B3 genes (GluB3-1 to GluB3-4) defined by Wang et al. [46], or the six Glu-D3 genes (GluD3-1 to GluD3-6) identified by Zhao et al. [44], [45]. This was done because the three groups of genes (alleles) were all isolated from wheat genotypes with diverse genetic backgrounds, and were more likely to capture the molecular diversity of LMW-GS genes in the overall wheat gene pool. Among the four Glu-A3 genes of Xiaoyan 54, nucleotide sequence comparisons showed that A3-2 and A3-3 both exhibited the highest identity (>99%) to Glu-A3d, whereas A3-4 displayed the highest identity (94.3%) to Glu-A3b (Table S3). However, the identities of A3-1 to the seven Glu-A3 alleles were generally less than 60% (Table S3). Actually, A3-1 was more than 97% identical to the two Glu-A3 LMW-GS sequences represented by GenBank accessions AB062868 (from the Glu-A3 locus of the bread wheat cv. Norin 61 [20]) and AJ293099 (from the Glu-A3 locus of the durum wheat cv. Langdon), respectively.

Similar nucleotide sequence comparisons suggested that, among the three Glu-B3 genes of Xiaoyan 54, B3-1 was most similar to GluB3-4 (94.3% identity), whereas both B3-2 and B3-3 were most similar to GluB3-3 (>99% identities) (Table S3). Among the seven Glu-D3 genes of Xiaoyan 54, D3-1, D3-2, D3-3, D3-6 and D3-7 displayed the highest nucleotide sequence identities to GluD3-5 (99.9%), GluD3-2 (99.4%), GluD3-3 (99.8%), GluD3-1 (99.7%) and GluD3-4 (99.1%), respectively (Table S3). D3-4 and D3-5 both showed the highest nucleotide sequence identities (>97%) to GluD3-6 (Table S3).

For the LMW-GS genes that shared higher than 90% nucleotide sequence identities in the above comparisons, their deduced protein products were generally of the same type (Table S3). Thus, A3-1 and the two sequences represented by AB062868 and AJ293099 all specified m-type subunits (with an identical N-terminal domain sequence MDTSCIPGLERPW). A3-2 and Glu-A3d, as well as A3-4 and Glu-A3b, encoded i-type subunits. B3-1 and GluB3-4 coded m-type subunits, whereas B3-2 and GluB3-3 yielded s-type subunits. D3-1, D3-2, D3-4/D3-5, D3-6 and D3-7, like their respective closest counterparts GluD3-5, GluD3-2, GluD3-6, GluD3-1 and GluD3-4, all encoded m-type subunits, whereas D3-3 and GluD3-3 specified s-type subunits.

Transcriptional profiles of LMW-GS genes during grain development

Further to the experiments described above, it was relevant and important to study the transcription profiles of LMW-GS genes in the developing seeds, and to compare the transcriptional patterns of these genes in wheat varieties differing in bread making quality. To achieve these goals, semiquantitative RT-PCR experiments were performed using gene-specific oligonucleotide primers (Table S1) designed for the 11 active LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54. Figure 3 shows that the 11 members were all highly transcribed in the developing grains of Xiaoyan 54. By contrast, in the developing grains of Jing 411, the transcripts of A3-2, D3-6 and D3-7 were undetectable, and the relative transcript levels of A3-1 and D3-4 were both substantially lower than those in Xiaoyan 54, especially at 21 days post anthesis (DPA) (Figure 3). The data displayed in Figure 3 are representative of four independent RT-PCR experiments.

Figure 3
Transcriptional profiles of LMW-GS genes in developing grains of Jing 411 and Xiaoyan 54.

Examination of LMW-GS gene sequences in Jing 411

The RT-PCR data described above indicated that there could be substantial differences between Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411 in their LMW-GS genes. To investigate this possibility, genomic PCR experiments were conducted to amplify the nucleotide sequences of LMW-GS genes in Jing 411, using the primers derived from the 14 LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54 (Table S1). Eleven LMW-GS gene sequences, which were alleles corresponding to A3-1, A3-2, A3-4, B3-1, B3-2, B3-3, D3-1, D3-2, D3-3, D3-4 and D3-5, were amplified from Jing 411 (Accession numbers FJ907547, FJ907548, FJ907549, FJ907550, FJ907551, FJ907552, FJ755317, FJ755318, FJ755319, FJ755322, FJ755323). However, no PCR products were obtained from Jing 411 using the primers specific for A3-3, D3-6 or D3-7. More detailed bioinformatic analysis of the LMW-GS gene sequences amplified from Jing 411 revealed that the A3-1, A3-2 and D3-4 alleles were pseudogenes due to the presence of premature stop codon or frame shift mutations in their coding regions. Like in Xiaoyan 54, D3-5 was also a pseudogene in Jing 411, but B3-3, a pseudogene in Xiaoyan 54, possessed an intact ORF in Jing 411. Taken together, the above analysis suggested that the total number of inactive LMW-GS genes in Jing 411 was four (i.e., A3-1, A3-2, D3-4 and D3-5), compared to three (i.e., A3-3, B3-3 and D3-5) in Xiaoyan 54. The increased number of pseudogenes and the absence of A3-3, D3-6 and D3-7 alleles in Jing 411 were consistent with the findings of fewer transcribed LMW-GS genes in the developing grains of this variety in the foregoing RT-PCR assay (Figure 3). The amino acid sequence identities for the proteins deduced from the active LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411 were 91.51% for A3-4 alleles, 93.94% for B3-1 alleles, 92.44% for B3-2 alleles, 99.71% for D3-1 alleles, 100% for D3-2 alleles, and 92.43% for D3-3 alleles.

Matching LWM-GS genes to their subunit products accumulated in the grains

The characterization of LMW-GS genes in the foregoing experiments, especially the finding of the differences in the spectrum of LMW-GS genes expressed in the two wheat varieties with differing bread making quality, made it necessary to identify the native protein products expressed from the active LMW-GS gene members. Towards this end, the glutenin fractions of the seed storage proteins of Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411 were separated by two dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), followed by analysis of the peptide mass fingerprints (PMFs) and mass spectra of excised protein spots using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). For Xiaoyan 54, 60 major 2-DE spots in the region of LMW-GS proteins were marked (Figure 4A), excised, and analyzed. After bioinformatic analysis of PMFs and MS/MS spectra, 19 were found to be LMW-GS proteins (red circles), 21 were gliadins (blue circles), three were related to known proteins with other molecular functions (black circles), and 17 were unknown proteins (green circles) (Figure 4A and Table S4). More detailed comparisons were made between the peptide sequences obtained from the protein spots and the deduced amino acid sequences of the 11 active LMW-GS genes isolated in this work (Table S5). Based on these comparisons, the relationships between the analyzed protein spots and the proteins deduced from the cloned LMW-GS genes are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 4B. The phenomenon that two or three protein spots were matched to the deduced protein of a single LMW-GS gene (e.g., protein spots 1, 2 and 3 to A3-4) was observed previously, although the underlying reasons are still unclear [41], [61]. Among the 60 spots analyzed, none corresponded to the hypothetical polypeptides of A3-3, B3-3 or D3-5, deduced by ignoring the premature stop codons (for A3-3 and D3-5) or the partial coding sequence (for B3-3).

Figure 4
Identification of protein spots resolved by 2-DE of the glutenin samples.
Table 2
Matching LMW-GS genes to the protein spots resolved by 2-DE through mass spectrometry analysis.

Of the 27 protein spots investigated for Jing 411, 11 (Figure 4C, circled in red) were characterized as LMW-GS proteins based on bioinformatic analysis of their PMFs and MS/MS spectra (Tables S6 and S7). The 11 spots were matched to seven active LMW-GS genes (Figure 4C, Tables 2, S6 and S7). Highly similar molecular mass and pI values were found between the protein spots derived from each of the five LMW-GS genes (B3-1, B3-2, D3-1, D3-2 and D3-3) shared by Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411 (Table 2, Figure 4B and 4C). The product of A3-4 in Jing 411 (spots 26 and 27) had higher pI values than that in Xiaoyan 54 (spots 1, 2 and 3). Spot 25 in Jing 411 was matched to the deduced protein of B3-3 (Figure 4C and Table 2), which was a pseudogene in Xiaoyan 54 (Table 1). Twelve spots (1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20) were gliadin proteins, three (21, 22 and 23) were known proteins with other molecular functions, and one (9) represented an unknown protein (Figure 4C, Tables S6 and S7). Among the 27 examined spots, none matched to the hypothetical polypeptides for A3-1, A3-2, D3-4 or D3-5, translated with the premature stop codon or frame shift mutations ignored.

Collectively, these protein analysis data were consistent with the results of the foregoing RT-PCR assays, and showed that protein products of five LMW-GS genes (A3-1, A3-2, D3-4, D3-6 and D3-7) accumulated in Xiaoyan 54 grains, were not present in the grains of Jing 411 (Figure 4 and Table 2). On the other hand, the protein product of B3-3 was detected in the grains of Jing 411 but not those of Xiaoyan 54 (Figure 4 and Table 2).

Analysis of LWM-GS genes and their products in Ae. Tauschii

The above experiments indicated the existence of five (in Jing 411) to seven (in Xiaoyan 54) LMW-GS genes at the Glu-D3 locus of hexaploid wheat varieties. It was therefore interesting and necessary to investigate if the number of genes encoding typical LMW-GS proteins may also vary in different genotypes of Ae. tauschii. The LMW-GS genes and their native protein products in different Ae. tauschii genotypes (As91 and Y207) were analyzed. The genomic DNA samples of As91 and Y207 were each subject to PCR amplifications using several types of primers (Table S1), and the resultant products were cloned and sequenced. Based on nucleotide and amino acid sequence comparisons, seven distinct Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes were identified for each genotype (Table 2) (Accession numbers from FJ755324 to FJ755337). The D3-4 and D3-5 alleles in As91 and Y207 were pseudogenes owing to the lack of intact ORF.

The LMW-GS fractions of As91 and Y207 were separated by 2-DE, followed by analysis using mass spectrometry as described above. Nineteen and 15 protein spots were detected in the region of LMW-GS proteins for As91 and Y207, respectively (Figure S3). For As91, 11 of the 19 analyzed spots were LMW-GS proteins, which matched separately to the deduced proteins of five LMW-GS genes (Figure S3A, Tables 2 and S8). Seven spots (4, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19) were gliadin proteins, whereas one (spot 15) resembled an avenin-like b precursor protein (Figure S3A, data not shown). For Y207, six of the 15 investigated spots were LMW-GS proteins, which corresponded separately to the deduced proteins of four LMW-GS genes (Figure S3B, Tables 2 and S9). Four spots (8, 9, 13 and 15) were identified to be gliadin proteins, one spot (14) was found to be an avenin-like b precursor protein, and the remaining 4 spots (7, 10, 11 and 12) represented unknown proteins (Figure S3B, data not shown). The product of D3-7 was not detected in Y207 by 2-DE, probably due to its low expression level in this genotype.

Effects of allelic Glu-3 loci on Zeleny sedimentation value

The clear differences in the LMW-GS genes between Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411 (as described above) provided a suitable system to investigate the effects of allelic Glu-3 loci on bread-making quality. Our initial investigation detected major and consistent quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for Zeleny sedimentation value (ZSV) in the genomic regions containing the Glu-A3 or D3 loci (data not shown). We therefore performed a more detailed association analysis using 182 RILs derived from Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411. ZSV was again chosen as the evaluation parameter based on our earlier QTL investigation. This choice was also supported by the published literature showing that ZSV correlated positively with gluten strength and bread volume [62]-[64], and that the genetic composition of Glu-3 loci affected ZSV [65]-[68].

The ZSVs of the RILs and their parents were evaluated using grains produced in two growing seasons (2005-2006 and 2007-2008). The data from 2006 harvest were analyzed in more detail to investigate the genetic effects of allelic Glu-3 loci on ZSV. The averaged ZSV of Xiaoyan 54 (40.00 ml) was significantly higher than that of Jing 411 (22.20 ml). The ZSVs of the 182 RILs varied from 9.22 to 61.45 ml, with a mean value of 32.4 ml. The ZSV means of the lines followed a normal distribution, and were thus suitable for association analysis. Eight main genotypes (A3xB3xD3x, A3jB3jD3j, A3xB3jD3x, A3jB3xD3x, A3xB3xD3j, A3jB3jD3x, A3xB3jD3j and A3jB3xD3j, the subscripts x and j indicating allelic Glu-3 loci from Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411, respectively) were found among a total of 158 RILs (Table 3). Two genotypes (A3xB3xD3x and A3jB3jD3j) resembled the Xiaoyan 54 or Jing 411 parents in their Glu-3 complements. The Glu-3 complements in the six recombinant genotypes (A3xB3jD3x, A3jB3xD3x, A3xB3xD3j, A3jB3jD3x, A3xB3jD3j and A3jB3xD3j) were formed by inter-locus recombinations of the intact allelic Glu-3 loci of Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411. The number of active LMW-GS genes was calculated for each of the eight genotypes (Table 3).

Table 3
Statistical analysis of the Zeleny sedimentation values (means ± SD) of eight genotypes among 152 RIL lines derived from a cross between Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411.

The ZSVs (means ± SD) of the eight recombinant genotypes showed continuous variation (Table 3), consistent with previous findings showing that ZSV is controlled quantitatively by multiple chromosomal loci located on different wheat chromosomes [34], [65], [66]. Nevertheless, our statistical analysis showed that the averaged ZSV of A3xB3xD3x was significantly higher than that of A3jB3jD3j. This demonstrated that in the genetic system analyzed here the differences in the composition of Glu-3 loci had a significant effect on ZSV, which was in general agreement with the positive contributions of Glu-3 loci to dough and bread-making qualities in published studies [13], [30], [32]-[34], [38], [56], [57], [59], [60], [64]. A3jB3jD3x, A3xB3jD3j and A3jB3xD3j, each possessing a single Glu-3 locus from Xiaoyan 54 (i.e., D3x, A3x or B3x) in their Glu-3 complements, did not differ from A3jB3jD3j in ZSV (Table 3). This indicated that, at the single locus level, the Glu-3 loci of Xiaoyan 54 did not differ significantly from those of Jing 411 in their effects on ZSV. By contrast, A3xB3jD3x, A3jB3xD3x and A3xB3xD3j, each having two Glu-3 loci from Xiaoyan 54 (i.e., A3x and D3x, B3x and D3x or A3x and B3x) in their Glu-3 complements, exhibited the ZSVs significantly higher than that shown by A3jB3jD3j (P≤0.05) (Table 3). The ZSV of A3xB3jD3x remained significantly higher than that of A3jB3jD3j at P≤0.01 (Table 3). Clearly, the combined effects of A3x and D3x, B3x and D3x or A3x and B3x were significantly greater than those of A3j and D3j, B3j and D3j or A3j and B3j in terms of generating relatively high ZSVs, with the A3x and D3x combination giving the strongest performance. Compared to the scenario described above, none of the six progeny genotypes yielded a ZSV that was significantly higher than that of A3xB3xD3x (Table 3). Instead, the ZSVs of A3xB3jD3j and A3jB3xD3j were both significantly lower than that of A3xB3xD3x (P≤0.05), and the ZSV of A3jB3xD3j remained notably lower than that of A3xB3xD3x at P≤0.01 (Table 3). This confirmed that the combined effects of B3j and D3j or A3j and D3j were inferior to those of B3x and D3x or A3x and D3x in securing relatively high ZSVs, with the A3j and D3j combination resulting in a poorer performance.

Interestingly, the RILs having the A3xB3jD3x genotype in their Glu-3 complements exhibited a considerably wider variation in ZSVs compared to the RILs having other Glu-3 genotypes (Table 3). Although the averaged ZSV determined for A3xB3jD3x genotype did not differ significantly from that for A3xB3xD3x (Table 3), there were four lines (among a total of 21 RILs) in the A3xB3jD3x genotype that consistently displayed the highest ZSVs (20-50% higher than the ZSV displayed by the superior parent Xiaoyan 54) in the tests conducted in two growing seasons. These data indicated that the B3 locus of Jing 411 might interact positively with the A3 and D3 loci of Xiaoyan 54, leading to higher ZSVs in certain genetic backgrounds.

We also investigated the relationship between the number of active LMW-GS genes (i.e., the members possessing intact ORF) and the averaged ZSV among the eight genotypes. Regression analysis suggested a significant positive correlation between changes in the number of active LMW-GS genes and variations in ZSV among the eight genotypes (r = 0.903, p≤0.01, Figure S4). This positive correlation was well illustrated by the finding that the ZSVs of A3xB3jD3x and A3xB3xD3x (having 12 and 11 active LMW-GS genes, respectively) were consistently and significantly higher than those of A3jB3xD3j and A3jB3jD3j (possessing six and seven active LMW-GS genes, respectively) (Table 3). However, owing to the strong and continuous variation in ZSV, the genotypes with smaller differences in the number of active LMW-GS genes tended not to differ significantly from each other in this parameter. For example, A3jB3xD3x, A3xB3xD3j, A3jB3jD3x and A3xB3jD3j did not differ from each other in ZSV, although the number of active LMW-GS genes in the four genotypes varied from eight to ten (Table 3).

A highly significant correlation (r = 0.907, p≤0.01) was found between the averaged ZSVs of the eight main recombinant genotypes determined in 2005-2006 and those in 2007-2008, suggesting that the genetic effects of the different Glu-3 genotypes on ZSV were relatively stable between the two years.


A number of studies have shown that the organization of orthologous Glu-3 loci in wheat is highly complex [26], [27], [41], [42], [44]-[47]. Unlike previous investigations focused on single or a small number of BACs from individual Glu-3 loci [26], [27], we used a genome wide approach, and identified and sequenced the BACs from all three Glu-3 loci of a bread wheat variety. Fourteen unique LMW-GS genes were found in Xiaoyan 54, representing the highest number of LMW-GS genes characterized from a single bread wheat genotype so far. Furthermore, we carried out comparative analyses of the transcriptional and protein accumulation patterns of LMW-GS genes between Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411, and performed an association study using the RIL population derived from a cross of the two varieties.

Organization of LMW-GS genes at orthologous Glu-3 loci

Firstly, we identified four and three LMW-GS genes for the Glu-A3 (A3-1 to A3-4) and Glu-B3 (B3-1 to B3-3) loci of Xiaoyan 54, respectively, by far the highest numbers of LMW-GS genes reported for the two loci from a single wheat genotype. Furthermore, we mapped A3-1 to a location proximal to the centromere relative to A3-2 to A3-4, and for the first time provided direct evidence for the presence, location and expression of a m-type subunit gene (A3-1) at Glu-A3 in addition to those encoding i-type subunits. Previous studies indicated the existence of m-type subunit gene(s) at Glu-A3, and hypothesized the evolution of i-type members from m-type genes [26] (see also GenBank accessions AB062868 and AJ293099). The present work established a more solid basis for further investigation of this hypothesis in the future. Nucleotide sequence comparisons showed that the three i-type subunit genes isolated here exhibited high identities to only two (Glu-A3b, Glu-A3d) of the seven Glu-A3 alleles reported for bread wheat varieties [47]. It is possible that the molecular diversity of Glu-A3 LMW-GS genes is relatively high in the bread wheat gene pool, and different varieties may differ in the composition of Glu-A3 LMW-GS genes. This may also explain the finding of two i-type subunit genes at the Glu-A3 locus of Norin 61, but one active i-type subunit gene at the Glu-A3 locus of Glenlea [41], [42]. Similarly, B3-1, B3-2 and B3-3 exhibited high nucleic sequence identities to only two (GluB3-3, GluB3-4) of the four Glu-B3 LMW-GS genes defined previously [46], indicating that the number of Glu-B3 LMW-GS genes in the whole bread wheat gene pool could be higher than that present in a given variety. A comparison of the Glu-B3 LMW-GS genes between Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411 (Table 2) indicated the presence of more s-type subunit than m-type subunit genes at this locus, consistent with the identification of three s-type, but only one m-type, subunit genes from a wide range of varietal backgrounds [46]. Two Glu-B3 LMW-GS genes were reported for both Norin 61 and Glenlea [41], [42], but the total numbers of Glu-B3 LMW-GS genes (including both active and inactive members) are still unknown for the two varieties.

Secondly, we identified and determined the relative genetic locations of seven LMW-GS genes (D3-1 to D3-7) at Glu-D3 in Xiaoyan 54. This number is identical to that described for the Glu-D3 locus of three Ae. tauschii accessions (AUS18913, As91 and Y207, [43], this work) and Norin 61 [41]. Furthermore, the seven Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54 each had one closely related counterpart (based on a nucleotide sequence identity above 97%) among the six Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes isolated from diverse bread wheat varieties [44], [45]. In contrast, the number of detectable Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes was five in Jing 411 (this work), and nine in Glenlea [42]. Collectively, these data strongly suggest that the number of Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes could vary from five to nine, and that a large proportion of Ae. tauschii and bread wheat genotypes may contain seven LMW-GS genes at their Glu-D3 locus. Our data (Table 2), as well as those published previously [41][45], all demonstrate that, within Glu-D3, the number of genes coding for m-type subunits is much greater than that encoding s-type subunits. Surprisingly, only m-type subunit genes were found at the Glu-D3 locus in Ae. tauschii accession AUS18913 [43], indicating that the s-type subunit gene in this material might have been mutated.

Thirdly, the occurrence of one or more inactive LMW-GS gene members is common to all three orthologous Glu-3 loci. For Glu-A3, the inactive members could originally encode i-type [26,27, this work] or m-type (i.e., the A3-1 pseudogene in Jing 411, Table 2) subunits. For Glu-B3, the pseudogene members could mainly code for s-type subunits originally [26, this work]. For Glu-D3, pseudogenization appeared to affect mainly the members originally specifying m-type subunits [43, this work]. The s-type subunit gene at Glu-D3 appeared to be expressed in diverse Ae. tauschii and bread wheat backgrounds [41,42,44,45, this work], except in Ae. tauschii accession AUS18913 [43]. The numbers of pseudogenes at allelic Glu-A3, B3 or D3 loci may vary substantially, which affects the total LMW-GS subunit species expressed in different bread wheat varieties. This is well illustrated by our comparative analysis of Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411 (Table 2). There are more inactive LMW-GS gene members at the Glu-A3 and D3 loci of Jing 411 than in Xiaoyan 54, which is the main reason for fewer i- and m-type subunit species expressed in Jing 411.

Recombination of LMW-GS genes and genetic distances of Glu-3 loci

An important prerequisite for investigating the functions of the Glu-3 loci through genetic analysis is to understand the recombination of LMW-GS genes and the relative genetic distances within the individual Glu-3 loci. The identification of multiple LMW-GS genes within individual Glu-3 loci allowed us to investigate these two aspects in Xiaoyan 54. The following points, summarized from the data of Xiaoyan 54, provide new insights into the recombination features of LMW-GS genes and genetic distances of the Glu-A3, B3 and D3 loci in bread wheat.

Firstly, for all three Glu-3 loci, recombinations may occur unevenly between different LMW-GS genes. No recombination was detected among the three i-type subunit genes (A3-2 to A3-4, Figure 2) within Glu-A3, despite the fact that A3-2 and A3-3 were separated by more than 70 kb and A3-4 was not located in the BAC harboring A3-2 and A3-3 (Table 1). Within Glu-B3, recombination was not found between B3-2 and B3-3 (Figure 2). As the BAC clone containing B3-2 and B3-3 was not completely sequenced, it is currently not possible to deduce if physical distance between the two members plays a role in the lack of recombination between them. Within Glu-D3, recombination was not found for two pairs of LMW-GS genes (D3-2 and D3-3, D3-6 and D3-7) (Figure 2). In the case of D3-2 and D3-3, the absence of recombinations is likely to be related to the very close physical distance (about 16 kb, Figure 1) between them.

Secondly, the genetic distance covered by LMW-GS genes differs substantially among the Glu-A3, B3 and D3 loci. In Xiaoyan 54, this value varied from 0.6 (Glu-B3) to 1.7 (Glu-A3) to 4.9 (Glu-D3) cM (Figure 2). The longest genetic distance was found for Glu-D3, correlating with the finding of more LMW-GS genes in this locus. Spielmeyer et al. [28] reported 2.7 cM for the three LMW-GS genes located on 1DS of Ae. tauschii. This distance is comparatively lower than the one obtained here, most likely due to the fact that fewer LMW-GS genes were mapped in their research.

Thirdly, based on the total genetic distance (4.9 cM) covered by LMW-GS genes and the minimum physical space (i.e., around 500 kb estimated from the total insert size of six BAC clones, Table 1) of Glu-D3 in Xiaoyan 54, the average ratio of physical to genetic distance for this locus is probably higher than 100 kb per cM. This local recombination rate is considerably lower than that suggested for the Glu-D3 locus of Ae. tauschii, which was about 20–50 kb/cM [28]. But our estimation is in line with recombination rates reported for some of the gene rich regions on wheat groups 1 and 5 chromosomes (118 kb/cM) [69], [70].

Concomitant to investigating the genetic features of LMW-GS genes, we also succeeded in placing polymorphic microsatellite markers in the vicinities of Xiaoyan 54 Glu-3 loci. Because these microsatellites are generally used for constructing wheat chromosome linkage maps, their incorporations may facilitate the comparisons of the map positions of Glu-3 LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54 with those of other varieties. For example, in the composite map of common wheat 1B chromosome (http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/map_summary.html), the genetic distance from the first Glu-B3 marker to the microsatellite Xgwm273.3 is 55 cM, which is comparable to the genetic distance covered from B3-2/B3-3 to the same microsatellite shown in Figure 2B (64.9 cM). In the composite map of common wheat 1D chromosome (http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/map_summary.html), the genetic distance from the only Glu-D3 marker to the microsatellite Xcfd61.1 is 44 cM, which is highly similar to the genetic distance from D3-6/D3-7 to the same microsatellite marker (42.8 cM, Figure 2C). Importantly, we mapped and ordered six LMW-GS genes within the Glu-D3 locus (compared to only one at the Glu-D3 of the 1D composite map, see above), which provides a useful basis for investigating potential functional differences among the different Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes in the future.

Expression of LMW-GS genes in the grains

For more detailed understanding of the expression of LMW-GS genes in a given genotype, two key challenges are to determine the total numbers of active and inactive LMW-GS genes at individual Glu-3 loci, and to match the active LMW-GS genes to their protein products accumulated in the seeds. In this work, we demonstrated that the combined use of gene cloning (through sequencing selected BAC clones and PCR amplification), expression profiling (via semiquantitative RT-PCR), and proteomics analysis (with 2-DE/MS analysis) represented an efficient strategy for dealing with the two challenges in bread wheat and for generating more systematic information linking active LMW-GS genes to their expressed products.

Among the 14 LMW-GS genes cloned from Xiaoyan 54, the 11 members with intact ORF were all highly transcribed in the developing grains and their proteins were present in the harvested seeds. Among the 11 LMW-GS genes isolated from Jing 411, the proteins translated from the seven LMW-GS genes with complete ORF were observed in the seeds, and evidence for high levels of transcription in the developing grains was obtained for six of the seven genes. Transcription of the B3-3 allele was not evaluated in Jing 411 grains because it was originally found to be a pseudogene in Xiaoyan 54. Together, these data suggest that the LMW-GS genes with intact ORF are generally and highly expressed in developing grains and their products accumulate in mature wheat seeds, although exceptions do occur in certain Ae. tauschii accessions (see below). For either Xiaoyan 54 or Jing 411, the proteomics analysis did not find protein spots derived from the LMW-GS genes with interrupted ORF. This is in accordance with the very low transcript levels detected for the A3-1 and D3-4 alleles in Jing 411, the two genes possessing ORFs disrupted by premature stop codons. It is very likely that damaged ORF may also be responsible for the lack of expression of A3-3 and D3-5 in both Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411, the absence of B3-3 expression in Xiaoyan 54, and the lack of A3-2 expression in Jing 411. No D3-6 and D3-7 transcripts were detected in the grains of Jing 411, which is in agreement with our failure to isolate the coding sequences of these two genes from this variety by genomic PCR amplifications. The two genes may not exist in Jing 411, or their coding regions may be damaged by transposon insertion. The disruption of LMW-GS ORF by transposon insertion was found previously for the LMW.S4 gene in Ae. tauschii [43], and for the B3-3 allele of Xiaoyan 54 in the present work.

The combination of gene cloning and proteomics analyses was also used successfully for assessing the LMW-GSs expressed in two different accessions of Ae. tauschii (As91, Y207). As in bread wheat, protein products were generally found for the LMW-GS genes with intact ORF, but not for those with disrupted ORF. One notable exception was that no protein product was detected by 2-DE/MS analysis for the D3-7 allele in Y207, despite that it had an intact ORF. Further study is needed to investigate if the D3-7 allele of Y207 is transcribed during grain development, or whether the protein translated from this allele is unstable in the endosperm cells. Among the seven Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes in Ae. tauschii accession AUS18913, four had intact ORF, and were predicted to encode protein species with different molecular mass and pI values [43]. However, only three protein spots with the molecular mass and pI values of LMW-GSs were found in 2-DE analysis of polymeric gluten proteins, indicating that one of the four LMW-GS genes with intact ORF may not be expressed in the seeds. Together, our analysis and the one by Johal et al. [43] have yielded a more extensive understanding of the composition and expression of Glu-D3 LMW-GS genes in Ae. tauschii, which is valuable for studying the structure and function of the homologous Glu-D3 locus and gene members in bread wheat.

Protein spots representing gliadins were commonly found in our proteomics analyses of the glutenin fractions from either bread wheat or Ae. tauschii accessions. This is consistent with the observations made by previous investigators [21], [43]. There is now evidence for the incorporation of certain gliadins into the polymeric glutenin fraction although the potential effect of such gliadins on bread-making quality is not understood [21], [43]. Because of the existence of multiple genes coding for gliadins along with those encoding LMW-GS proteins in the chromosomal regions harboring Glu-3 loci [26], an important task for the future will be to dissect the physical, genetic and functional relationships of the two types of seed storage proteins.

Genetic mechanism involved in the function of Glu-3 loci in bread-making quality

Although past breeding and QTL studies established that allelic LMW-GS alleles can differ significantly in their effects on bread-making quality, the molecular genetic mechanism responsible for the difference is still not well understood. In this work, the elucidation of the allelic variations of Glu-3 loci between Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411 and an understanding of the recombination characteristics of these genes enabled us to carry out an association analysis using the RILs derived from the two varieties. The knowledge gained provides new insights into the genetic mechanism behind the function of Glu-3 loci, and may also have practical implications on the improvement of ZSV and bread-making quality.

Firstly, positive interactions between the orthologous Glu-3 loci from the superior parent (Xiaoyan 54) may be important for the recombinant progenies to achieve relatively high ZSVs. However, the combinations of the strongest Glu-3 alleles from the superior parent (for example, the A3 and D3 alleles of Xiaoyan 54) and certain alleles from the inferior parent (i.e., the B3 allele of Jing 411) may yield the highest ZSV in certain genetic backgrounds. Secondly, the beneficial effects on ZSV, brought about either by the interaction among the Glu-3 loci from the superior parent or via certain combinations of the Glu-3 loci from both parents, are likely to be achieved through increasing the number of active LMW-GS genes contained in the Glu-3 complement. In general, a higher number of active LMW-GS genes tends to lead to a higher ZSV. This may explain the presence of a number of RILs with very high ZSVs in the A3xB3jD3x genotype. It possessed the highest number of active LMW-GS genes (i.e., 12) owing to the combinations of the three Glu-3 loci each of which contained more active LMW-GS genes than its allelic counterpart. However, the potential of A3xB3jD3x to give more elevated ZSV may be influenced by genetic backgrounds, which, in turn, may be responsible for the more extensive variation of ZSVs observed for the RILs with genotype A3xB3jD3x.

From the points discussed above, it appears that the total number of active LMW-GS genes contained in, and expressed from, Glu-3 complements may largely determine the effect of LMW-GSs on ZSV and probably bread-making quality. Elite Glu-3 alleles may generally be associated with the possession of higher numbers of active LMW-GS genes, and the combinations of elite alleles at all Glu-3 loci (A3, B3 and D3) may enhance the contribution of LMW-GSs to bread-making quality. Interestingly, the elite Glu-3 locus allele, LMW-2, in durum wheat also harbors and expresses a higher number of active LMW-GS genes than the alternative allele [18], [21], [48], [50], [51], indicating similarity in the mechanism behind the function of LMW-GSs in end use quality in tetraploid and hexaploid wheat varieties.

In practical bread wheat improvement programs, the selection of recombinant progenies with the highest number of active LMW-GS genes in the Glu-3 complement from breeding populations, combined with direct evaluation of their ZSVs, may increase the chance of obtaining lines with superior bread-making quality. In line with this suggestion, previous studies demonstrated that selection of higher sedimentation volume results in enrichment of the elite LMW-2 locus in durum wheat breeding [71].

In summary, this work has substantially improved our understanding of the genomic organization and recombination of LMW-GS genes at orthologous Glu-3 loci, the expression of LMW-GS genes in bread wheat and Ae. tauschii, and the genetic mechanism involved in the function of Glu-3 loci in bread-making quality. The system characterized here may provide a useful model for further studies of the function and mechanism of LMW-GS genes, the physical structure of orthologous Glu-3 loci, and the potential functional interaction between LMW-GSs and gliadins. The new insights and resources generated in this work may also accelerate the efficient use of these genes in further improvement of bread-making quality in wheat.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and general molecular and bioinformatic methods

Winter-type bread wheat varieties Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411 were used in this study. Xiaoyan 54 exhibited relatively high flour protein content (13.2%) and expressed five HMW-GS proteins (1Ax1, 1Bx14+1By15, 1Dx2+1Dy12). Jing 411 also expressed five HMW-GS proteins (1Ax2*, 1Bx7+1By8, 1Dx2+1Dy12) but showed a comparatively lower flour protein content (11.7%) [59], [60]. In baking tests, the loaf volume of Xiaoyan 54 was approximately 10% larger than that of Jing 411 [59], [60]. A recombinant inbred population containing 182 lines (F8 generation), developed from a cross between Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411, was utilized for mapping LMW-GS genes and the subsequent association analysis (see below). Two Ae. tauschii accessions (As91 and Y207, obtained from the Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, China) were also used. Chinese Spring (CS) and the nulli-tetrasomic (NT) lines derived from CS (obtained from the National Bioresource Project, Japan) were employed for assigning positive BAC clones to individual group 1 chromosomes. The general molecular and bioinformatic methods used in this work are described in Methods S1.

BAC library construction and screening and BAC sequencing

The main protocol for constructing the BAC library of Xiaoyan 54 was from Zhang et al. [72] and http://hbz.tamu.edu. The resultant library was screened by PCR using several pairs of primers specific for LMW-GS sequence (Table S1). Full details for BAC library construction, library screening and analysis of positive clones are given in Methods S1.

Development of molecular markers, chromosomal location of BAC clones, and genetic mapping of LMW-GS genes

The molecular markers (Table S2) were mainly derived from LMW-GS genes or BAC end sequences. Specifically, the markers for tagging A3-1, A3-2/A3-3/A3-4, B3-2/B3-3, D3-1, D3-4, D3-6, or D3-7 were developed from LMW-GS gene sequences, whereas those for B3-1 or D3-2/D3-3 were from microsatellite sequences (located adjacent to B3-1 and D3-2, respectively). The marker for D3-5 was developed from the reverse end sequence of the BAC clone D479-7-6. Details for using these markers to assign the positive BAC clones to group 1 chromosomes, or to map LMW-GS genes, are summarized in Table S2.

For mapping the LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54 to wheat chromosomes, 182 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from Xiaoyan 54× Jing 411 cross and the polymorphic markers listed Table S2 were used. Further details on mapping the LMW-GS genes and 23 previously published microsatellite markers along group 1 chromosomes are described in Methods S1.

Evaluation of LMW-GS gene transcript level by semi-quantitative RT-PCR assay

The seedlings of Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411 were vernalized at 4°C for four weeks, followed by growth in the greenhouse with a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod. Temperatures in the greenhouse were set at 23°C (day) and 14°C (night) before anthesis, and at 27°C (day) and 16°C (night) after flowering. The developing grains were harvested from the two varieties at 7, 14 and 21 days post anthesis, respectively, and were immediately used for total RNA extraction using Trizol reagent and the accompanying protocol (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Full details on RNA transcription, cDNA synthesis and semi-quantitative PCR are provided in Methods S1.

Isolation of the coding sequences of LMW-GS genes from Jing 411 and Ae. tauschii accessions As91 and Y207

Primer pairs 1 to 17 (Table S1) were used to isolate LMW-GS gene sequences from Jing 411 by genomic PCR amplification. Primer pairs 2 to 7 and 13 to 17 (Table S1) were deployed for cloning the LMW-GS genes in Ae. tauschii accessions As91 and Y207. The resultant PCR products were sequenced commercially (Sun Bio-chem Technology, Beijing, China). Construction of LMW-GS gene nucleotide sequences was conducted as descried above.

Glutenin extraction and 2-DE

Glutenin extraction was performed according to the method described by Singh et al. [73] with some modifications. Full details for preparing glutenin samples and their separation by 2-DE are described in Methods S1.

Mass spectrometry analysis

Selected protein spots were carefully excised from gels. After destaining, the gel pieces were dehydrated with acetonitrile and dried. Digestion was performed in chymotrypsin reaction buffer containing 60 ng chymotrypsin (Sigma–Aldrich, MO, USA) at 30°C for 6 h. Finally, 8 µL trifluoroacetic acid extraction buffer [5% (v/v)] was added to stop the digestion. The peptides in the digested gel pieces were extracted, and the resulting supernatants were concentrated by freeze-drying. Further details on the analysis of peptide samples by MALDI-TOF-MS and LC-MS/MS are given in Methods S1.

Evaluation of ZSV and association analysis

The RIL population and the two parents (Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411) were grown for two crop seasons (2005–2006, 2007–2008) in the experimental farm of the Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing. Standard winter wheat cultivation practices, including three irrigations and two applications of pesticides to control aphid infestation and powdery mildew, were followed. No major abiotic stresses (drought, hot and dry winds) were encountered. For each RIL and the parents, a sample of 500 g of grains (15.5% moisture) was milled using a Brabender Junior Mill (Brabender OHG, Duisburg, Germany) fitted with a 70GG sieve. Zeleny sedimentation values were measured for each line with three replicates according to Axford et al. [74].

The genetic compositions of Glu-3 loci in the 182 RILs were determined using eight polymorphic markers (Table S2), leading to identification of eight main recombinant genotypes (A3xB3xD3x, A3jB3jD3j, A3xB3jD3x, A3jB3xD3x, A3xB3xD3j, A3jB3jD3x, A3xB3jD3j and A3jB3xD3j) among the RILs. Several rare Glu-3 genotypes (in a total of 24 RILs) resulting from intra-locus recombinations were also found, but were not included in the association analysis owing to the very low number of RILs per genotype. Based on the analysis of the allelic Glu-3 loci of Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411, the number of active LMW-GS genes was summarized for each of the eight recombinant progeny genotypes. The averaged ZSVs determined for the eight main recombinant genotypes during the two seasons were significantly correlated (r = 0.907, p≤0.01). For statistical analysis, t-tests were performed using the T-TEST procedure of SAS 10.0 (SAS Institute Inc., North Carolina, USA).

Supporting Information

Methods S1

(0.07 MB DOC)

Figure S1

Southern blot hybridization analysis of positive BAC clones using a probe specific for LMW-GS genes.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Figure S2

Alignment of the amino acid sequences deduced from active LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54.

(0.02 MB PDF)

Figure S3

Identification of protein spots resolved by 2-DE of glutenin samples from As91 and Y207.

(0.04 MB PDF)

Figure S4

Significant and positive correlation between number of active LMW-GS genes and mean ZSV.

(0.02 MB PDF)

Table S1

Oligonucleotide primers used for LMW-GS gene cloning and expression profiling experiments.

(0.02 MB PDF)

Table S2

Oligonucleotide primers used in BAC clone chromosomal localization and LMW-GS gene genetic mapping experiments.

(0.02 MB PDF)

Table S3

Nucleotide sequence identities of the 14 LMW-GS genes of Xiaoyan 54 to previously reported Glu-A3, B3 or D3 LMW-GS alleles/genes [44]-[46], [47].

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S4

Characterization of protein spots resolved by 2-DE of the glutenin fraction of Xiaoyan 54 with MALDI-TOF-MS and LC-MS/MS analyses.

(0.04 MB PDF)

Table S5

Matching LMW-GS protein spots resolved by 2-DE to the proteins predicted from the cloned active LMW-GS genes using the mass spectragraphs generated by LC-MS/MS analysis in Xiaoyan 54.

(0.05 MB PDF)

Table S6

Characterization of the protein spots resolved by 2-DE of the glutenin fraction of Jing 411 with MALDI-TOF-MS and LC-MS/MS analyses.

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S7

Matching LMW-GS protein spots resolved by 2-DE to proteins predicted from the cloned active LMW-GS genes using mass spectragraphs generated by LC-MS/MS analysis in Jing 411.

(0.05 MB PDF)

Table S8

Matching LMW-GS protein spots resolved by 2-DE to proteins predicted from cloned active LMW-GS genes using the mass spectragraphs generated by LC-MS/MS analysis in Ae. tauschii accession As91.

(0.05 MB PDF)

Table S9

Matching LMW-GS protein spots resolved by 2-DE to proteins predicted from cloned and active LMW-GS genes using mass spectra generated by LC-MS/MS analysis in Ae. tauschii accession Y207.

(0.03 MB PDF)


We thank Professors Rudi Appels (Murdoch University, Perth, Australia) and Jorge Dubcovsky (University of California at Davis, CA, USA) for constructive suggestions on this work, and Drs Zhonghu He and Pingping Zhang (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China) for advice on the quality parameters of Xiaoyan 54 and Jing 411.


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: Financial support for this work was provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grants 2006AA100102, 2006AA10A105, 2006AA10Z1B2, 2009CB118300) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 30821061). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Shewry PR, Tatham AS, Barro F, Barcelo P, Lazzeri P. Biotechnology of breadmaking: unraveling and manipulating the multi-protein gluten complex. Nat Biotechnol. 1995;13:1185–1190. [PubMed]
2. Weegels PL, Hamer RJ, Schofield JD. Functional properties of wheat glutenin. J Cereal Sci. 1996;23:1–17.
3. Osborne TB. The vegetable proteins. London: Longmans Green and Co. 1924;154
4. MacRitchie F. Evaluation of contributions from wheat protein fractions to dough mixing and breadmaking. J Cereal Sci. 1987;6:259–268.
5. Hussain A, Lukow OM. Influence of gliadin-rich subfractions of Glenlea wheat on the mixing characteristics of wheat flour. Cereal Chem. 1997;74:791–799.
6. Uthayakumaran S, Gras PW, Stoddard FL, Békés F. Effects of varying protein content and glutenin-to-gliadin ratio on the functional properties of wheat dough. Cereal Chem. 1999;76:389–394.
7. Payne PI. Genetics of wheat storage protein and the effect of allelic variation on bread-making quality. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1987;38:141–153.
8. Gupta RB, Shepherd KW. Two-step one-dimensional SDS-PAGE analysis of LMW subunits of glutelin. 1. Variation and genetic control of the subunits in hexaploid wheats. Theor Appl Genet. 1990;80:65–74. [PubMed]
9. Payne PI, Corfield KG, Holt LM, Blackman JA. Correlations between the inheritance of certain high-molecular weight subunits of glutenin and bread-making quality in progenies of six crosses of bread wheat. J Sci Food Agric. 1981;32:51–60.
10. Blechl AE, Anderson OD. Expression of a novel high-molecular-weight glutenin subunit gene in transgenic wheat. Nat Biotechnol. 1996;14:875–879. [PubMed]
11. Barro F, Rooke L, Békés F, Gras P, Tatham AS, et al. Transformation of wheat with high molecular weight subunit genes results in improved functional properties. Nat Biotechnol. 1997;15:1295–1299. [PubMed]
12. Butow BJ, Gale KR, Ikea J, Juhasz A, Bedo Z, et al. Dissemination of the highly expressed Bx7 glutenin subunit (Glu-B1al allele) in wheat as revealed by novel PCR markers and RP-HPLC. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109:1525–1535. [PubMed]
13. Eagles HA, Hollamby GJ, Gororo NN, Eastwood RF. Estimation and utilisation of glutenin gene effects from the analysis of unbalanced data from wheat breeding programs. Aust J Agric Res. 2002;53:367–377.
14. Eagles HA, Cane K, Eastwood RF, Hollamby GJ, Kuchel H, et al. Contributions of glutenin and puroindoline genes to grain quality traits in southern Australian wheat breeding programs. Aust J Agric Res. 2006;57:179–186.
15. Cornish GB, Békés F, Eagles HA, Payne PI. Prediction of dough properties for bread wheats. In: Wrigley C, Békés F, Bushuk W, editors. Gliadin and glutenin: the unique balance of wheat quality. Minnesota: American Association of Cereal Chemists; 2006. pp. 243–280.
16. Tao HP, Kasarda DD. Two-dimensional gel mapping and N-terminal sequencing of LMW-glutenin subunits. J Exp Biol. 1989;40:1015–1020.
17. Lew EJL, Kuzmicky DD, Kasarda DD. Characterization of low molecular weight glutenin subunits by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and N-terminal amino acid sequencing. Cereal Chem. 1992;69:508–515.
18. Masci S, Lew EJL, Lafiandra D, Porceddu E, Kasarda DD. Characterization of low molecular weight glutenin subunits in durum wheat by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and N-terminal sequencing. Cereal Chem. 1995;72:100–104.
19. Cloutier S, Rampitsch C, Penner GA, Lukow OM. Cloning and expression of a LMW-i glutenin gene. J Cereal Sci. 2001;33:143–154.
20. Ikeda TM, Nagamine T, Fukuoka H, Yano H. Identification of new low-molecular-weight glutenin subunit genes in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2002;104:680–687. [PubMed]
21. D'Ovidio R, Masci S. The low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits of wheat gluten. J Cereal Sci. 2004;39:321–339.
22. Singh NK, Shepherd KW. Linkage mapping of genes controlling endosperm storage proteins in wheat. 1. Genes on the short arms of group 1 chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet. 1988;75:628–641.
23. Jackson EA, Holt LM, Payne PI. Characterisation of high molecular weight gliadin and low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits of wheat endosperm by two-dimensional electrophoresis and the chromosomal localization of their controlling genes. Theor Appl Genet. 1983;66:29–37. [PubMed]
24. Pogna NE, Autran JC, Mellini F, Lafiandra D, Feillet P. Chromosome 1B-encoded gliadins and glutenin subunits in durum wheat: genetics and relationship to gluten strength. J Cereal Sci. 1990;11:15–34.
25. Ruiz M, Carrillo JM. Linkage relationships between prolamin genes on chromosomes 1A and 1B of durum wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 1993;87:353–360. [PubMed]
26. Gao S, Gu YQ, Wu J, Coleman-Derr D, Huo N, et al. Rapid evolution and complex structural organization in genomic regions harboring multiple prolamin genes in the polyploid wheat genome. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;65:189–203. [PubMed]
27. Wicker T, Yahiaoui N, Guyot R, Schlagenhauf E, Liu ZD, et al. Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight glutenin loci of the A and Am genomes of wheat. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1186–1197. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Spielmeyer W, Moullet O, Laroche A, Lagudah ES. Highly recombinogenic regions at storage protein loci on chromosome 1DS of Aegilops tauschii, the D-genome donor of wheat. Genetics. 2000;155:361–367. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Yahiaoui N, Srichumpa P, Dudler R, Keller B. Genome analysis at different ploidy levels allows cloning of the powdery mildew resistance gene Pm3b from hexaploid wheat. Plant J. 2004;37:528–538. [PubMed]
30. Appels R, Gras P, Clarke BC, Anderssen R, Wesley I, et al. Molecular genetic studies on processing traits of wheat flour. Euphytica. 2001;119:49–54.
31. Perretant MR, Cadalen T, Charmet G, Sourdille P, Nicolas P, et al. QTL analysis of bread-making quality in wheat using a doubled haploid population. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;100:1167–1175.
32. Ma W, Appels R, Bekes F, Larroque O, Morell MK, et al. Genetic characterisation of dough rheological properties in a wheat doubled haploid population: additive genetic effects and epistatic interactions. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;111:410–422. [PubMed]
33. Kuchel H, Langridge P, Mosionek L, Williams K, et al. The genetic control of milling yield, dough rheology and baking quality of wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;112:1487–1495. [PubMed]
34. Nelson JC, Andreescu C, Breseghello F, Finney PL, Gualberto DG, et al. Quantitative trait locus analysis of wheat quality traits. Euphytica. 2006;149:145–159.
35. Li Y, Song Y, Zhou R, Branlard G, Jia J. Detection of QTLs for bread-making quality in wheat using a recombinant inbred line population. Plant Breeding. 2009;128:235–243.
36. Mann G, Diffey S, Cullis B, Azanza F, Martin D, et al. Genetic control of wheat quality: interactions between chromosomal regions determining protein content and composition, dough rheology, and sponge and dough baking properties. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;118:1519–1537. [PubMed]
37. Patil RM, Oak MD, Tamhankar SA, Rao VS. Molecular mapping of QTLs for gluten strength as measured by sedimentation volume and mixograph in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp durum). J Cereal Sci. 2009;49:378–386.
38. Raman R, Allen H, Diffey S, Raman H, Martin P, et al. Localisation of quantitative trait loci for quality attributes in a doubled haploid population of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome. 2009;52:701–715. [PubMed]
39. Kihara H. Discovery of the DD-analyser, one of the ancestors of Triticum vulgare (Japanese). Agric Hortic (Tokyo) 1944;19:13–14.
40. McFadden ES, Sears ER. The origin of Triticum spelta and its free-threshing hexaploid relatives. J Hered. 1946;37:107–116. [PubMed]
41. Ikeda TM, Araki E, Fujita Y, Yano H. Characterization of low-molecular-weight glutenin subunit genes and their protein products in common wheats. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;112:327–334. [PubMed]
42. Huang XQ, Cloutier S. Molecular characterization and genomic organization of low molecular weight glutenin subunit genes at the Glu-3 loci in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2008;116:953–966. [PubMed]
43. Johal J, Gianibelli MC, Rahman S, Morell MK, Gale KR. Characterization of low-molecular-weight glutenin genes in Aegilops tauschii. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109:1028–1040. [PubMed]
44. Zhao XL, Xia XC, He ZH, Gale KR, Lei ZS, et al. Characterization of three low-molecular-weight Glu-D3 subunit genes in common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;113:1247–1259. [PubMed]
45. Zhao XL, Xia XC, He ZH, Lei ZS, Appels R, et al. Novel DNA variations to characterize low molecular weight glutenin Glu-D3 genes and develop STS markers in common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;114:451–460. [PubMed]
46. Wang LH, Zhao XL, He ZH, Ma W, Appels R, et al. Characterization of low-molecular-weight glutenin subunit Glu-B3 genes and development of STS markers in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2009;118:525–539. [PubMed]
47. Zhang W, Gianibelli MC, Rampling LR, Gale KR. Characterization and marker development for low molecular weight glutenin genes from Glu-A3 alleles of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2004;108:1409–1419. [PubMed]
48. Payne PI, Jackson EA, Holt LM. The association between γ-gliadin 45 and gluten strength in durum wheat varieties: A direct causal effect or the result of genetic linkage? J Cereal Sci. 1984;2:73–81.
49. Josephides CM, Joppa LR, Youngs VL. Effect of chromosome 1B on gluten strength and other characteristics of durum wheat. Crop Sci. 1986;27:212–216.
50. Autran JC, Laignelet B, Morel MH. Characterization and quantification of low molecular weight glutenins in durum wheats. Biochimie. 1987;69:699–711. [PubMed]
51. D'Ovidio R, Tanzarella OA, Porceddu E. Molecular analysis of gliadin and glutenin genes in T. durum cv. Lira. A model system to analyse the molecular bases of quality differences in durum wheat cultivars. J Cereal Sci. 1992;16:165–172.
52. Jackson EA, Morel MH, Sontag-Strohm T, Branlard G, Metakovsky EV, et al. Proposal for combining the classification systems of alleles of Gli-1 and Glu-3 loci in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Genet Breed. 1996;50:321–336.
53. Gupta RB, Singh NK, Shepherd KW. The cumulative effect of allelic variation in LMW and HMW glutenin subunits on dough properties in the progeny of two bread wheats. Theor Appl Genet. 1989;77:57–64. [PubMed]
54. Gupta RB, Békés F, Wrigley CW. Prediction of physical dough properties from glutenin subunit composition in bread wheats: correlation studies. Cereal Chem. 1991;68:328–333.
55. Metakovsky EV, Wrigley CW, Békés F, Gupta RB, Metakovskii EV. Gluten polypeptides as useful genetic markers of dough quality in Australian wheats. Aust J Agric Res. 1990;41:289–306.
56. Békés F, Kemeny S, Morell M. An integrated approach to predicting end-product quality of wheat. Eur J Agron. 2006;25:155–162.
57. Oury F-X, Chiron H, Faye A, Gardet O, Giraud A, et al. The prediction of bread wheat quality: joint use of the phenotypic information brought by technological tests and the genetic information brought by HMW and LMW glutenin subunits. Euphytica. 2010;171:87–109.
58. He ZH, Rajaram S, Xin ZY, Huang GZ. Mexico, editor. A history of wheat breeding in China. D.F.: CIMMYT. 2001.
59. He ZH, Liu L, Xia XC, Liu JJ, Peña RJ. Composition of HMW and LMW glutenin subunits and their effects on dough properties, pan bread, and noodle quality of Chinese bread wheats. Cereal Chem. 2005;82:345–350.
60. Zhang PP, He ZH, Zhang Y, Xia XC, Liu JJ, et al. Pan bread and Chinese white salted noodle qualities of Chinese winter wheat cultivars and their relationship with gluten protein fractions. Cereal Chem. 2007;84:370–378.
61. Mamone G, De Caro S, Di Luccia A, Addeo F, et al. Proteomic-based analytical approach for the characterization of glutenin subunits in durum wheat. J Mass Spectrom. 2009;44:1709–1723. [PubMed]
62. Branlard G, Pierre J, Rousset M. Selection indices for quality evaluation in wheat breeding. Theor Appl Genet. 1992;84:57–64. [PubMed]
63. Payne PI, Holt LM, Krattiger AF, Carrillo JM. Relationships between seed quality characteristics and HMW glutenin subunit composition determined using wheats grown in Spain. J Cereal Sci. 1988;3:229–235.
64. Rakszegi M, Boros D, Kuti C, Lang L, Bedo Z, et al. Composition and end-use quality of 150 wheat lines selected for the HEALTHGRAIN diversity screen. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:9750–9757. [PubMed]
65. Zanetti S, Keller M, Winzeler M, Saurer W, et al. QTL for quality parameters for bread-making in a segregating wheat by spelt population. In: Scarascia Mugnozza GT, Porceddu E, Pagnotta MA, editors. Genetic and Breeding for Crop Quality and Resistance. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999. pp. 357–360.
66. Zanetti S, Winzeler M, Feuillet C, Keller B, Messmer M. Genetic analysis of bread-making quality in wheat and spelt. Plant Breeding. 2001;120:13–19.
67. Zhang YL, Wu YP, Xiao YG, Yan J, Zhang Y, et al. QTL mapping for milling, gluten quality, and flour pasting properties in a recombinant inbred line population derived from a Chinese soft×hard wheat cross. Crop & Pasture Sci. 2009;60:587–597.
68. Groos C, Bervas E, Chanliaud E, Charmet G. Genetic analysis of bread-making quality scores in bread wheat using a recombinant inbred line population. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115:313–323. [PubMed]
69. Gill KS, Gill BS, Endo TR, Boyko EV. Identification and high-density mapping of gene-rich regions in chromosome group 5 of wheat. Genetics. 1996a;143:1001–1012. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Gill KS, Gill BS, Endo TR, Taylor T. Identification and high-density mapping of gene-rich regions in chromosome group 1 of wheat. Genetics. 1996b;144:1883–1891. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Peña RJ, Trethowan R, Pfeiffer WH, Van Ginkel M. Quality (end-use) improvement in wheat: compositional, genetic, and environmental factors. J Crop Prod. 2002;5:1–37.
72. Zhang HB, Zhao X, Ding X, Paterson AH, Wing RA. Preparation of megabase-size DNA from plant nuclei. Plant J. 1995;7:175–184.
73. Singh NK, Shepherd KW, Cornish GB. A simplified SDS-PAGE procedure for separating LMW subunits of glutenin. J Cereal Sci. 1991;14:203–208.
74. Axford DWE, McDermott EE, Redman DG. Note on the sodium dodecyl sulfate test of breadmaking quality: comparison with Pelshenke and Zeleny tests. Cereal Chem. 1979;56:582–583.

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...