Logo of jcellbiolHomeThe Rockefeller University PressThis articleEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
J Cell Biol. Oct 4, 2010; 191(1): 15–22.
PMCID: PMC2953446
Report

Live imaging of single nuclear pores reveals unique assembly kinetics and mechanism in interphase

Abstract

In metazoa, new nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) form at two different cell cycle stages: at the end of mitosis concomitant with the reformation of the nuclear envelope and during interphase. However, the mechanisms of these assembly processes may differ. In this study, we apply high resolution live cell microscopy to analyze the dynamics of single NPCs in living mammalian cells during interphase. We show that nuclear growth and NPC assembly are correlated and occur at a constant rate throughout interphase. By analyzing the kinetics of individual NPC assembly events, we demonstrate that they are initiated by slow accumulation of the membrane nucleoporin Pom121 followed by the more rapid association of the soluble NPC subcomplex Nup107–160. This inverse order of recruitment and the overall much slower kinetics compared with postmitotic NPC assembly support the conclusion that the two processes occur by distinct molecular mechanisms.

Introduction

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) are multiprotein channels that span the two membranes of the nuclear envelope of eukaryotic cells. The assembly of these large protein complexes requires coordination of several hundred individual proteins and the stabilization of highly curved membranes. In metazoa, new NPCs form at two different cell cycle stages: at the end of mitosis concomitant with the reformation of the nuclear envelope and during interphase (Antonin et al., 2008).

Postmitotic NPC assembly is thought to be regulated by the phosphorylation of several nucleoporins by mitotic kinases (Onischenko et al., 2005; Glavy et al., 2007) as well as by the small GTPase Ran and its counterplayer importin-β. Importin-β binds to several nucleoporins during mitosis, and their release by RanGTP in the vicinity of chromatin is crucial for postmitotic NPC assembly (Walther et al., 2003b). Assembly is initiated by the Nup107–160 complex in early anaphase, when it binds to chromatin via its DNA-binding subunit embryonic large molecule derived from yolk sac (ELYS)/Mel28 (Franz et al., 2007). This complex is essential for pore formation, and pore-free nuclei form in its absence in Xenopus laevis egg extract (Harel et al., 2003; Walther et al., 2003a; Franz et al., 2007; Gillespie et al., 2007). The association of membrane nucleoporins (Pom121) with the newly forming pores is the second phase of NPC assembly, followed by addition of the Nup93 and Nup62 complexes and finally more peripheral nucleoporins (Bodoor et al., 1999; Haraguchi et al., 2000; Dultz et al., 2008). Although many of the mechanistic interactions remain to be understood, the order and timeline of events that lead to the formation of NPCs after mitosis are thus rather well defined.

By comparison, the process of NPC assembly in interphase in metazoan cells is poorly characterized and has only recently become the focus of research (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Doucet et al., 2010; Iino et al., 2010). Although assembly during both phases of the cell cycle is thought to produce indistinguishable pores, and some of the regulatory requirements such as activity of the small GTPase Ran are conserved between interphase and mitosis (Walther et al., 2003b; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Iino et al., 2010), the assembly takes place under fundamentally different conditions. At the end of mitosis, a large number of NPCs assemble simultaneously. NPC assembly is initiated on naked chromatin and occurs concomitant with the reformation of the nuclear envelope, and the cytoplasm is in the biochemical state of mitotic exit with significant remaining mitotic kinase activity. In contrast, interphase assembly events are singular and rare. NPC insertion into the closed nuclear envelope requires fusion between inner and outer nuclear membranes, and there is no mitotic kinase activity in the cytoplasm. A very recent study has also reported molecular differences in the requirements of some nucleoporins for the two assembly processes (Doucet et al., 2010). ELYS, which mediates the interaction of the Nup107–Nup133 complex with chromatin, appears dispensable for interphase assembly. On the other hand, the membrane nucleoporin Pom121 as well as a membrane association domain of Nup133 were found to be required.

Here, we have, for the first time, analyzed the dynamics of NPCs throughout the entire interphase of mammalian cells by live cell microscopy. We show that nuclear growth and NPC assembly are correlated and occur continuously throughout interphase, leading to an almost constant overall NPC density throughout the cell cycle. In addition, we define the kinetics of individual NPC assembly events in interphase. We demonstrate that NPC assembly in interphase is considerably slower than during postmitotic assembly and that the nucleoporin subcomplexes are added in a different order. These findings support the conclusion that NPC assembly at the end of mitosis and in interphase occurs via distinct mechanisms.

Results and discussion

We first asked when during interphase new NPCs are assembled in mammalian cells. Individual normal rat kidney (NRK) cells stably expressing the membrane nucleoporin Pom121 tagged with EGFP (previously characterized in Rabut et al., 2004; Dultz et al., 2008) were tracked from mitosis to mitosis, and high resolution confocal images of the bottom surface of their nuclei were acquired every 1–2 h (Fig. 1 A). Low sampling frequency ensured that the cells were not disturbed in their cell cycle progression and minimized photobleaching. NPC densities measured on the bottom and top surfaces of individual nuclei were indistinguishable (P = 0.4 for paired t test), and the bottom surface of the nucleus was therefore assumed to be representative for the entire nucleus. NPC density was ~6–7 NPCs/µm2 throughout interphase with a slight but significant decrease of the mean density from 6.9 ± 0.7 NPCs/µm2 in early G1 to 6.4 ± 0.8 NPCs/µm2 in late G2 (n = 11 and P = 0.02 for paired t test; Fig. 1 C). This observation is in contrast to a previous study in HeLa cells in which the NPC density increases from G1 to G2 (Maul et al., 1972).

Figure 1.
NPC density and nuclear growth during interphase. (A) An NRK cell stably expressing Pom121-3EGFP was tracked throughout the entire cell cycle. The signal from NPCs on the bottom surface of the nucleus is shown in inverted grayscale. Times relative to ...

To estimate at what rate new NPCs form during the cell cycle, we next measured the growth of the nuclear surface during interphase. Because NPCs are anchored in the nuclear lamina and do not move relative to each other in the plane of the nuclear envelope (Daigle et al., 2001), individual NPCs can be tracked over long intervals. Measuring the area between tracked NPCs (Fig. 1, B and D), we determined the growth rate of the nuclear surface to be 3.9 ± 0.7% per hour (24 cells from four independent experiments). We also independently determined the growth rate of the entire nucleus by imaging NRK cells expressing fluorescent nuclear markers and reconstructing the nuclear volume (Fig. S1). The growth rate of the nuclear surface area determined in this manner was 4.1 ± 1.4% per hour (24 cells from four independent experiments), which is indistinguishable from the growth rate of the bottom surface measured by pore tracking (P = 0.7 for unpaired t test). This indicates that nuclear growth occurs homogenously over the entire surface of the nucleus. Interestingly and in agreement with previous observations (Maul et al., 1973), nuclear growth was independent of DNA replication because treatment with aphidicolin to inhibit DNA polymerase did not affect nuclear growth rates while effectively blocking cells at the G1/S boundary (Fig. S1).

The NPC density and nuclear surface area measurements allowed us to calculate the number of NPCs on the nucleus during the cell cycle. Our data predict a continuous increase in the number of NPCs throughout interphase with 60–80 new NPCs forming per nucleus in 1 h. Nuclei of NRK cells had 1,960 ± 390 NPCs in early G1 and 2,830 ± 740 NPCs in late G2. We did not detect a phase of higher NPC formation rate during early S phase as reported for HeLa S3 cells (Maul et al., 1972). Our data indicate that the total number of NPCs at the end of G2 does not account for all NPCs formed in both daughter nuclei by early G1. Postmitotic NPC assembly therefore either has to rely on preexisting nucleoporin pools that were not assembled into NPCs in the preceding interphase or nucleoporins newly synthesized immediately after mitosis. Previous work in fixed cells showed an approximate doubling of NPC numbers from ~2,000 in G1 to ~4,000 in G2 in HeLa cells (Maul et al., 1972). The differences in our findings are likely a result of variations between different cell lines in NPC assembly during interphase, which may be related to cell cycle length and metabolic rates.

In our long-term high resolution observations of NPCs on the nuclei of individual cells (Fig. 1 A), new NPCs appearing between preexisting ones could be identified. We next wanted to determine whether interphase assembly occurred with the same kinetics as postmitotic assembly. Our recent characterization of the kinetics of postmitotic NPC assembly in the same cell type (Dultz et al., 2008) provided a quantitative basis for a direct comparison. To determine the kinetics with which individual new NPCs are assembled from their subcomplexes in interphase, NPCs of cells expressing GFP-tagged nucleoporins were imaged on the bottom surface of the nucleus. In agreement with previous work (D’Angelo et al., 2006), we observed new NPC assembly events at previously pore-free sites independent of the position of preexisting NPCs (Fig. 2) and could not find any evidence for “pore-splitting” events in our analysis of a total of ~150 single NPC assembly events.

Figure 2.
Assembly of individual new NPCs in interphase. (A–C) Time series showing the assembly of individual NPCs labeled by members of different NPC subcomplexes: (A) Nup107–160 complex labeled by 3EGFP-Nup107 and 3EGFP-Nup133; (B) Nup93 complex ...

We first analyzed the assembly kinetics of two major soluble NPC subcomplexes, the Nup107–160 complex (represented by GFP fusions of Nup107 and Nup133) and the Nup93 complex (represented by GFP fusion of Nup93). The Nup107–160 complex is essential for NPC formation both after mitosis and in interphase (Walther et al., 2003a; D’Angelo et al., 2006). We observed that the accumulation of the Nup107–160 complex at sites of new NPC assembly from background nuclear envelope levels to levels comparable to neighboring preexisting pores was completed within ~15 min (Fig. 2 A). Similar results were found for the Nup93 complex (Fig. 2 B), which is also essential for correct NPC assembly and provides interaction between soluble and transmembrane components of the NPC (Mansfeld et al., 2006; Hawryluk-Gara et al., 2008). Fitting of the assembly kinetics with a sigmoid function allowed us to determine characteristic assembly times. These were not significantly different for the Nup107–160 complex and Nup93 with 12 ± 8 min (n = 21) and 9 ± 10 min (n = 14), respectively (P = 0.2 for unpaired t test; Fig. 3, A and B), indicating that these two essential soluble NPC subcomplexes assemble into NPCs with similar kinetics.

Figure 3.
Kinetics of NPC assembly in interphase. (A) Plots of NPC assembly kinetics. Curves were aligned after fitting with the sigmoid function along the half-maximal intensity. All measured data points are displayed in gray. Colored lines show a sigmoid curve ...

We then measured the assembly kinetics of the integral membrane nucleoporin Pom121, which is also essential for NPC assembly (Antonin et al., 2005). In contrast to the relatively rapidly assembling soluble components, the majority of NPC assembly events observed for Pom121 were characterized by a gradual accumulation process that could last several hours before the newly forming NPCs reached similar intensities as neighboring preexisting NPCs (Fig. 2 C). The characteristic assembly time determined for Pom121 was 29 ± 15 min (n = 28). Interestingly, a high variability in the assembly kinetics of Pom121 between individual newly assembling NPCs was apparent (range of characteristic assembly time from first to third quartile was 15–44 min; Fig. 3, A and B). We occasionally observed fast events also for Pom121 consistent with an individual rapid NPC formation event reported previously for this nucleoporin (D’Angelo et al., 2006).

Overall, the NPC assembly process during interphase is thus significantly slower than after mitosis, in which all NPCs of the daughter nucleus form within ~10 min (Dultz et al., 2008). We were able to directly compare the kinetics between interphase and postmitotic assembly by fitting our previously published quantitative data for the assembly kinetics of Nup133 (representing the Nup107–160 complex), Nup93, and Pom121 at the end of mitosis (Dultz et al., 2008) with the same sigmoid function. This yielded mean characteristic postmitotic assembly times of 1.9 ± 0.5 min for Nup133, 0.75 ± 0.17 min for Nup93, and 1.5 ± 0.2 min for Pom121 (n = 5 for all nucleoporins; Fig. 3 C and Fig. S2). Although the precision of the comparison is somewhat hampered by the lower time resolution necessary to capture the slow and rare single NPC assembly events in interphase, the difference in the overall duration of the assembly process between interphase and mitosis by about one order of magnitude is striking (Fig. 3, B and C). This longer time frame of NPC assembly in interphase might be, for example, a result of the requirement for fusion between inner and outer nuclear membranes.

In addition to NPC assembly events, we occasionally observed events of apparent NPC disassembly in which a fluorescent signal of indistinguishable appearance from neighboring NPCs disappeared (Fig. 2 D and Fig. S3). Disappearance of the signal in all observed cases occurred very rapidly, but the events were too rare to characterize their kinetics in detail. Such “disassembling” pores were also observed in cells coexpressing Nup107 and Pom121 tagged with different fluorescent proteins, indicating that they indeed represent NPCs (Fig. S3 B). In these double-labeled events, both signals decreased simultaneously (at a 15-min time resolution), indicating that disassembly is more rapid than assembly also in interphase, similar to our previous observations in mitosis (Dultz et al., 2008). Previous analysis in live cells indicated that NPCs are extremely stable in interphase (Daigle et al., 2001; Rabut et al., 2004) and can remain assembled and functional for the entire lifetime of differentiated cells in Caenorhabditis elegans (D’Angelo et al., 2009). Our observations suggest that NPCs may be able to disassemble spontaneously during interphase at low frequency. It will be interesting to study this process further in the future when advances in imaging technology will allow capturing these rare and transient events reliably.

To gain insight into not only the kinetics but also the order of interphase NPC assembly, we next asked whether the slow accumulation of the integral membrane protein Pom121 at the assembly site is an early or late step of assembly. At the end of mitosis, NPCs assemble in a stereotypic and highly ordered process in which the different nucleoporin subcomplexes are sequentially recruited to the reforming nuclear envelope (Bodoor et al., 1999; Dultz et al., 2008). Assembly is initiated by the binding of the Nup107–160 complex to chromatin upon anaphase onset, where it provides the assembly seeds for NPCs that then recruit transmembrane nucleoporins like Pom121 (Dultz et al., 2008; Rasala et al., 2008). By analyzing cells expressing Pom121 and Nup107 tagged with GFP and mCherry, respectively, resulting in double-labeled pores, we found that this order is inverted in interphase. Of 34 double-labeled NPC assembly events, 28 (82%) started with the signal of Pom121 appearing before the signal of Nup107, 5 showed simultaneous appearance of both nucleoporins (at a time resolution of 15 min), and only once was the signal of Nup107 above the significance threshold (see Materials and methods section Measurements of pore formation kinetics) before Pom121 (Fig. 4 C). There was no difference in this assembly order after swapping the colors between Pom121 and Nup107, excluding an influence of the different fluorescent proteins on the detection of the tagged proteins. Fitting of the assembly kinetics and temporal alignment using the half-maximal intensity of Nup107 as a reference clearly shows the assembly of the transmembrane protein Pom121 before Nup107 with a mean delay of 45 ± 36 min between the half-maximal intensities of Pom121 and Nup107 (Fig. 4 B). Our data thus provide direct evidence that during interphase, Pom121 assembles into newly forming NPCs before Nup107, as proposed by Doucet et al. (2010) based on indirect immunofluorescence data. Surprisingly, the order of recruitment of these two essential subcomplexes for NPC assembly is thus the opposite of postmitotic assembly, demonstrating fundamental mechanistic differences between NPC assembly in the two different cell cycle states. After mitosis, NPC assembly is initiated by the large, soluble Nup107–160 subcomplex by binding to chromatin via ELYS, thus defining the assembly position and acting as a platform for NPC assembly. Our data show that, in interphase, this role is taken over by other NPC components, likely by the transmembrane nucleoporin Pom121. Interestingly, both Nup107–160 and Pom121 have been implicated in providing a checkpoint for nuclear envelope closure of in vitro assembled nuclei (Antonin et al., 2005). They might play a similar role, but in reverse order, during interphase assembly and are then followed by the assembly of peripheral and central channel nucleoporins.

Figure 4.
Order of NPC assembly. (A) A cell expressing Pom121-3EGFP and 3mCherry-Nup107 was imaged at a time resolution of 15 min. A newly appearing NPC is circled. Black data points represent the mean of 10 preexisting pores. Red boxes on overview image indicate ...

Conclusion

Our findings provide direct evidence for different kinetics and mechanisms of NPC assembly during mitosis and interphase. We show that NPC assembly in interphase is an order of magnitude slower than in mitosis and that essential components of the NPC are recruited to the assembly site in a different order. To our knowledge, the NPC is thus the first example of a multiprotein complex, which is assembled by distinct mechanisms in two different phases of the cell cycle. These different mechanisms have likely evolved to cope with the fundamentally different cellular conditions between interphase and mitosis. Most importantly, the membrane fusion between inner and outer nuclear membranes may be the rate-limiting step of NPC assembly in interphase. This is supported by recent data showing that not only Pom121 but also the membrane binding domain of Nup133 play important roles, specifically during interphase NPC assembly (Doucet et al., 2010). Because postmitotic NPC assembly occurs on open chromatin concomitant with nuclear envelope formation, no direct fusion event may be required in this process (Antonin et al., 2008).

The two distinct mechanisms of NPC assembly could also reflect the fundamentally different functional requirements of the nucleus after mitosis and in interphase. After mitosis, nuclear import has to be established quickly to allow DNA decondensation and the onset of gene transcription. Therefore, rapidly building prepores on the surface of chromosomes that can immediately start nuclear import as soon as the new nuclear membrane barrier is laterally attached to them are an ideally suited mechanism. By contrast, in interphase, nuclei already have fully established transport capacity and a tightly controlled permeability barrier toward the cytoplasm. The main function of NPC assembly during interphase presumably is to maintain nuclear envelope homeostasis during nuclear growth in order to provide enough material for the two daughter cells in the next cell cycle. In this situation, a more gradual assembly process that initiates with the crucial step of a controlled membrane fusion would preserve the nucleo-cytoplasmic diffusion barrier and maintain controlled transport.

Materials and methods

DNA constructs and cell culture

pPom121-3mCherry and p3mCherry-Nup107 were created by replacing the three copies of EGFP in pPom121-3EGFP (Daigle et al., 2001) and p3EGFP-Nup107 (Belgareh et al., 2001) with three copies of mCherry. NRK cells were maintained in standard DME medium. An NRK cell line stably expressing Pom121-3EGFP (Daigle et al., 2001) was generated by selection with 0.5 mg/ml Geneticin (Invitrogen) and maintained in the presence of the antibiotic. The NRK cell line stably expressing IBB-DiHcRed was described previously in Dultz et al. (2009). Both cell lines had mean cell cycle durations of 12.5 h, similar to wild-type NRK cells. All imaging of Pom121 alone was performed in the stable cell line. For experiments with other nucleoporins, the plasmids p3EGFP-Nup107, p3EGFP-Nup133 (Belgareh et al., 2001), pNup93-3EGFP (Rabut et al., 2004), p3mCherry-Nup107, pPom121-3EGFP, and pPom121-3mCherry were expressed transiently as indicated in the figure legends. 3EGFP-Nup107 and 3EGFP-Nup133 were always cotransfected for enhanced signal. Transfections with plasmid DNA were performed with FuGene (Roche) or jetPRIME (PEQLAB Biotechnologie GmbH) according to the instructions of the manufacturer 50–80 h before imaging. All used nucleoporin fusion proteins are stably bound at the NPC (Rabut et al., 2004) and are therefore expected to correctly reflect the structure and assembly of the endogenous proteins. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude subtle changes in the transport properties of the assembled NPCs containing GFPs as has been suggested by single-molecule transport experiments (Yang and Musser, 2006).

Live cell microscopy

For live cell microscopy, cells were seeded into chambered coverglasses (LabTek; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the culture medium was exchanged for prewarmed imaging medium (CO2-independent medium without phenol red [Invitrogen] supplemented with 20% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 mg/ml penicillin, and streptomycin) at least 30 min before imaging. The chambers were sealed with silicon grease. Live cell microscopy was performed at 37°C on an LSM 510 Meta microscope using the LSM software or an LSM 710 microscope using the Zen software (all microscopes and objectives were obtained from Carl Zeiss, Inc.). High resolution NPC data for a single color were acquired on a microscope (LSM 510 Meta) with a 100× Plan-α Fluar objective, NA 1.45. Nuclear volume measurements were performed with a 63× Plan-Apochromat objective, NA 1.4. NPC data in two colors were acquired on the LSM 510 using a 100× Plan-Apochromat objective, NA 1.4 or on the LSM 710 with a 63× Plan-Apochromat objective, NA 1.4. The AutoTimeSeries Macro (Rabut and Ellenberg, 2004) was used to automatically track cells during time-lapse experiments whenever possible on the LSM software–run microscopes. Imaging for single NPC assembly events was performed with a time resolution of 3–15 min. Three optical sections at a distance of 0.4–0.5 µm were acquired to cover the entire nuclear envelope and thus exclude that appearance or disappearance of individual NPCs might be caused by local folding or focus fluctuations. For all single-pore analysis, cells were chosen among the 10% highest expressing cells that exhibited no aberrant aggregates or NPC clusters in order to provide sufficient signal for this high resolution time-lapse assay.

Image analysis

Image processing was performed in ImageJ (National Institutes of Health). Calculations and fitting were performed in Excel (Microsoft) unless otherwise stated.

Pore density measurements

The density of pores was measured using the ITCN plugin for ImageJ to find the peak fluorescence of individual pores in a manually selected in-focus region of the nuclear surface. Images were first filtered with a Gaussian blur filter in ImageJ with kernel size 2.5 and then were analyzed with the ITCN plugin using the following parameters: a width of 7 pixels, distance of 6 pixels, and threshold of 0.3–0.5. Errors in this peak detection method were estimated to be <5% by comparison to manual identification of pores on 10 randomly chosen images. Time courses of NPC density of individual cells were fitted by linear regression, and the slopes were tested to significantly deviate from 0 with a p-value of 0.02 (one sample z test).

Measurements of pore formation kinetics

Time-lapse series for the analysis of pore formation kinetics were z projected and registered according to two manually selected landmarks. Newly forming pores were identified visually, and intensities were measured on the best in-focus slice for single-color data and on the mean intensity projection for two-color data. For each individual newly forming pore, a preexisting pore of representative intensity was chosen as a reference pore. The best in-focus slice was identified individually for each frame by the highest signal intensity of this reference pore. Background intensities were measured on the same slice and subtracted. Only newly forming pores that reached an intensity at least half the intensity of the reference pore and for which the intensity increase from background intensity to final plateau was at least twice the SD of the intensity fluctuations of the reference pore were considered for analysis. For comparison of the kinetics of different nucleoporin subcomplexes, background-subtracted intensity data normalized to the upper plateau were fitted with a sigmoid function of the form y = 1 − 1/(1 + exp((t − t0)/τ), where t0 is the time of the half-maximum and τ is the characteristic time. Fitting was performed with the Curve Fitting Toolbox of Matlab (MathWorks, Inc.). Because of the lower photostability and quantum yield of mCherry relative to EGFP, it was not possible to obtain movies of comparable quality in two colors. Therefore, for the data shown in Fig. 4 C, the first time point of appearance of a new NPC in each color was judged to be the time point when the signal first reached an intensity of at least three SDs above the background of 10 randomly chosen pore-free regions and no more than two SDs below the intensity of 10 well-defined preexisting NPCs. In addition, the dynamic range between background and preexisting NPCs was required to be at least twice the sum of the SDs of background and preexisting NPCs.

Online supplemental material

Fig. S1 shows nuclear growth during interphase. Fig. S2 shows sigmoid fits for postmitotic NPC assembly. Fig. S3 shows evidence for disassembly of NPCs. Online supplemental material is available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.201007076/DC1.

Acknowledgments

We thank Catherine Chapuis for the cloning of the 3mCherry tag and members of the Ellenberg and Mattaj groups for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.

This work was supported by funding from the German Research Council to J. Ellenberg (grants DFG EL 246/3-1 and DFG EL 246/3-2 within the priority program SPP1175). E. Dultz acknowledges support by a fellowship from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory International PhD Program.

Footnotes

Abbreviations used in this paper:

ELYS
embryonic large molecule derived from yolk sac
NPC
nuclear pore complex
NRK
normal rat kidney

References

  • Antonin W., Franz C., Haselmann U., Antony C., Mattaj I.W. 2005. The integral membrane nucleoporin pom121 functionally links nuclear pore complex assembly and nuclear envelope formation. Mol. Cell. 17:83–92 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.010 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Antonin W., Ellenberg J., Dultz E. 2008. Nuclear pore complex assembly through the cell cycle: regulation and membrane organization. FEBS Lett. 582:2004–2016 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.067 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Belgareh N., Rabut G., Baï S.W., van Overbeek M., Beaudouin J., Daigle N., Zatsepina O.V., Pasteau F., Labas V., Fromont-Racine M., et al. 2001. An evolutionarily conserved NPC subcomplex, which redistributes in part to kinetochores in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 154:1147–1160 10.1083/jcb.200101081 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bodoor K., Shaikh S., Salina D., Raharjo W.H., Bastos R., Lohka M., Burke B. 1999. Sequential recruitment of NPC proteins to the nuclear periphery at the end of mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 112:2253–2264 [PubMed]
  • Daigle N., Beaudouin J., Hartnell L., Imreh G., Hallberg E., Lippincott-Schwartz J., Ellenberg J. 2001. Nuclear pore complexes form immobile networks and have a very low turnover in live mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 154:71–84 10.1083/jcb.200101089 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • D’Angelo M.A., Anderson D.J., Richard E., Hetzer M.W. 2006. Nuclear pores form de novo from both sides of the nuclear envelope. Science. 312:440–443 10.1126/science.1124196 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • D’Angelo M.A., Raices M., Panowski S.H., Hetzer M.W. 2009. Age-dependent deterioration of nuclear pore complexes causes a loss of nuclear integrity in postmitotic cells. Cell. 136:284–295 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.037 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Doucet C.M., Talamas J.A., Hetzer M.W. 2010. Cell cycle-dependent differences in nuclear pore complex assembly in metazoa. Cell. 141:1030–1041 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.036 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dultz E., Zanin E., Wurzenberger C., Braun M., Rabut G., Sironi L., Ellenberg J. 2008. Systematic kinetic analysis of mitotic dis- and reassembly of the nuclear pore in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 180:857–865 10.1083/jcb.200707026 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dultz E., Huet S., Ellenberg J. 2009. Formation of the nuclear envelope permeability barrier studied by sequential photoswitching and flux analysis. Biophys. J. 97:1891–1897 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.07.024 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Franz C., Walczak R., Yavuz S., Santarella R., Gentzel M., Askjaer P., Galy V., Hetzer M., Mattaj I.W., Antonin W. 2007. MEL-28/ELYS is required for the recruitment of nucleoporins to chromatin and postmitotic nuclear pore complex assembly. EMBO Rep. 8:165–172 10.1038/sj.embor.7400889 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gillespie P.J., Khoudoli G.A., Stewart G., Swedlow J.R., Blow J.J. 2007. ELYS/MEL-28 chromatin association coordinates nuclear pore complex assembly and replication licensing. Curr. Biol. 17:1657–1662 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.041 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Glavy J.S., Krutchinsky A.N., Cristea I.M., Berke I.C., Boehmer T., Blobel G., Chait B.T. 2007. Cell-cycle-dependent phosphorylation of the nuclear pore Nup107-160 subcomplex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:3811–3816 10.1073/pnas.0700058104 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Haraguchi T., Koujin T., Hayakawa T., Kaneda T., Tsutsumi C., Imamoto N., Akazawa C., Sukegawa J., Yoneda Y., Hiraoka Y. 2000. Live fluorescence imaging reveals early recruitment of emerin, LBR, RanBP2, and Nup153 to reforming functional nuclear envelopes. J. Cell Sci. 113:779–794 [PubMed]
  • Harel A., Orjalo A.V., Vincent T., Lachish-Zalait A., Vasu S., Shah S., Zimmerman E., Elbaum M., Forbes D.J. 2003. Removal of a single pore subcomplex results in vertebrate nuclei devoid of nuclear pores. Mol. Cell. 11:853–864 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00116-3 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hawryluk-Gara L.A., Platani M., Santarella R., Wozniak R.W., Mattaj I.W. 2008. Nup53 is required for nuclear envelope and nuclear pore complex assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:1753–1762 10.1091/mbc.E07-08-0820 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Iino H., Maeshima K., Nakatomi R., Kose S., Hashikawa T., Tachibana T., Imamoto N. 2010. Live imaging system for visualizing nuclear pore complex (NPC) formation during interphase in mammalian cells. Genes Cells. 15:647–660 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01406.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mansfeld J., Güttinger S., Hawryluk-Gara L.A., Panté N., Mall M., Galy V., Haselmann U., Mühlhäusser P., Wozniak R.W., Mattaj I.W., et al. 2006. The conserved transmembrane nucleoporin NDC1 is required for nuclear pore complex assembly in vertebrate cells. Mol. Cell. 22:93–103 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.015 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Maul G.G., Maul H.M., Scogna J.E., Lieberman M.W., Stein G.S., Hsu B.Y., Borun T.W. 1972. Time sequence of nuclear pore formation in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocytes and in HeLa cells during the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 55:433–447 10.1083/jcb.55.2.433 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Maul H.M., Hsu B.Y., Borun T.M., Maul G.G. 1973. Effect of metabolic inhibitors on nuclear pore formation during the HeLa S3 cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 59:669–676 10.1083/jcb.59.3.669 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Onischenko E.A., Gubanova N.V., Kiseleva E.V., Hallberg E. 2005. Cdk1 and okadaic acid-sensitive phosphatases control assembly of nuclear pore complexes in Drosophila embryos. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:5152–5162 10.1091/mbc.E05-07-0642 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rabut G., Ellenberg J. 2004. Automatic real-time three-dimensional cell tracking by fluorescence microscopy. J. Microsc. 216:131–137 10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01404.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rabut G., Doye V., Ellenberg J. 2004. Mapping the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:1114–1121 10.1038/ncb1184 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rasala B.A., Ramos C., Harel A., Forbes D.J. 2008. Capture of AT-rich chromatin by ELYS recruits POM121 and NDC1 to initiate nuclear pore assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:3982–3996 10.1091/mbc.E08-01-0012 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Walther T.C., Alves A., Pickersgill H., Loïodice I., Hetzer M., Galy V., Hülsmann B.B., Köcher T., Wilm M., Allen T., et al. 2003a. The conserved Nup107-160 complex is critical for nuclear pore complex assembly. Cell. 113:195–206 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00235-6 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Walther T.C., Askjaer P., Gentzel M., Habermann A., Griffiths G., Wilm M., Mattaj I.W., Hetzer M. 2003b. RanGTP mediates nuclear pore complex assembly. Nature. 424:689–694 10.1038/nature01898 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yang W., Musser S.M. 2006. Nuclear import time and transport efficiency depend on importin β concentration. J. Cell Biol. 174:951–961 10.1083/jcb.200605053 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...