• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of bmcmudisBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11: 197.
Published online Sep 1, 2010. doi:  10.1186/1471-2474-11-197
PMCID: PMC2941484

Protocol for a population-based Ankylosing Spondylitis (PAS) cohort in Wales

Abstract

Background

To develop a population-based cohort of people with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in Wales using (1) secondary care clinical datasets, (2) patient-derived questionnaire data and (3) routinely-collected information in order to examine disease history and the health economic cost of AS.

Methods

This data model will include and link (1) secondary care clinician datasets (i.e. electronic patient notes from the rheumatologist) (2) patient completed questionnaires (giving information on disease activity, medication, function, quality of life, work limitations and health service utilisation) and (3) a broad range of routinely collected data (including; GP records, in-patient hospital admission data, emergency department data, laboratory/pathology data and social services databases). The protocol involves the use of a unique and powerful data linkage system which allows datasets to be interlinked and to complement each other.

Discussion

This cohort can integrate patient supplied, primary and secondary care data into a unified data model. This can be used to study a range of issues such as; the true economic costs to the health care system and the patient, factors associated with the development of severe disease, long term adverse events of new and existing medication and to understand the disease history of this condition. It will benefit patients, clinicians and health care managers. This study forms a pilot project for the use of routine data/patient data linked cohorts for other chronic conditions.

Background

Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis affecting between 1 in 400 and 1 in 270 people [1,2]. AS is characterised by inflammation of the spine, resulting in progressive and irreversible fusion of the spine. Peripheral joints, particularly the hips [3] can also be involved, often requiring hip replacement surgery. In a significant number of patients, AS is also associated with inflammation of other organs such as the heart [4,5], eyes [6], bowel [7] and skin [8]. In common with most chronic inflammatory conditions, AS is heterogeneous, having a variable course and unpredictable episodes of exacerbation [9].

AS typically strikes people in their late teens or early adult life and runs for the remainder of the life-course. It therefore has a significant impact on employment and function and on the use of health and social care resources. Over 80% of patients report daily pain, 60% report daily use of drugs 20 years after diagnosis [10] and in a Dutch study only 54.2% of the AS cohort were participating in the labour work force [11].

Our study proposes to collect and link a range of complementary sets of data; including, robust clinical data from rheumatologists (diagnosis, MRI/radiograph images), existing routinely collected datasets such as the GP records, out-patients clinical data, in-patient activity, emergency department, laboratory/pathology data and social services databases and finally data collected directly from the patients themselves (disease activity, function, quality of life, work limitations).

Re-use of routine data is problematic and requires detailed knowledge of the datasets and their idiosyncracies. Information Governance challenges can also be a problem in such distributed datasets. These problems have been surmounted by the establishment of the Health Information Research Unit (HIRU) at the School of Medicine at Swansea University as part of the Welsh Assembly Government's commitment to the UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC). Its remit is to realise the potential of electronically held, person-based, routinely collected information to conduct and support health-related research. HIRU has set up the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank to bring together, link and anonymise the widest possible range of person-based data, and has done this using a split-file approach to anonymisation to overcome issues of confidentiality and disclosure in health-related data warehousing [12]. The SAIL databank operates within a robust series of guidelines in line with the Caldicott principles and the National Information Governance Board for Health and Social Care. [13].

The collection and linkage of data proposed here is unique and not currently feasible elsewhere. Due to the existing routine data linkages [12] and a new rheumatology network incorporating all rheumatologists in Wales, it is now possible to undertake a national AS cohort study identifying a well defined and characterised group, with the intention of expanding this strategy to other rheumatological conditions in the future.

Methods/Design

Aims

This study aims to develop a cohort of people with AS using existing data from clinical and routine sources and data collected from patient completed questionnaires.

Recruitment and composition of the cohort

All patients living in Wales diagnosed with AS by a rheumatologist will be included. Examining all GP records in the Swansea area showed that there are 361 people registered with AS in 2006 out of 239,354 people registered with a GP. This gives a prevalence of 1.5 per 1000. Extrapolating this figure to the whole of Wales generates an estimated 4354 people in Wales with a diagnosis of AS. We plan to write to all patients with AS attending a rheumatologist in Wales as well as those registered with participating GPs, to ask for their consent to be included in this cohort. With this combined approach we anticipate a cohort of 2000 pseudonymised AS patients or 50% of all available AS patients.

Data sources

The AS cohort will be built on the SAIL data bank [13] and will use SAIL's approach to data linkage and anonymity. In this approach, the data provider divides a data file into two parts; the personal information (name, date of birth, address, national health number) in the first part (file 1), and the clinical data in the second (file 2), with a joining key to link the two parts. The personal information (file 1) is sent to a third party (Health Solutions Wales) who match the information against a list of all people registered with the National Health Service in Wales. In cases where the NHS number is absent, a mixture of other identifiers is used for probabilistic matching. This creates a linking number (Anonymised Linking Field), which is then encrypted to become ALF_E. The other identifiers are deleted, giving File 3. File 3 is then sent to HIRU. File 2 is sent directly to HIRU by the data provider. Files 2 and 3 are then brought together at the SAIL databank where they are merged using the joining key, which is then deleted [12].

This growing databank already holds over a billion anonymised records from 13 databases and these can be anonymously linked at the individual record level [13]. The SAIL databank has been used in characterising latent autoimmune diabetes in adults [14], establishing the hospitalised prevalence of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis [15], and investigating differences in blood pressure measurements taken in primary and secondary care settings [16]. Linkage of routine data to trial cohorts has been done in relation to identifying patients for a depression trial [17], to facilitate recruitment for a diabetes trial [18], and to link environmental information about the domestic circumstances of pregnant women with routinely collected child health data [19].

Thus, the use of this data warehouse in a wide range of clinical and research settings using combinations of routinely collected and trial data has been established. With the triangulation of datasets (comparing the same data items from different datasets), the validity and reliability of single datasets can be assessed.

Clinical data from Rheumatology centres

All rheumatology centres in Wales are in the process of adopting the same electronic clinical database system: Welsh Arthritis and Rheumatology Dataset (WARD). This is implemented on the CELLMA platform (RioMed Ltd., Eastleigh, Hampshire, http://www.riomed.com). WARD will, as a minimum, record all rheumatological diagnoses, date of diagnoses and medications whenever the rheumatological teams see a patient, in addition to providing clinical data support during consultations. This system can be used to easily identify all patients with a specific rheumatological diagnosis (such as AS) across Wales. Historical information about existing patients will be entered into the WARD system.

In 3 participating centres, a pilot scheme will be carried out to examine the feasibility of using existing radiographs or MRI reports. The pilot will examine the numbers of images available and the ease of obtaining them. If the collection of radiographs and MRIs is feasible, the radiographs will be scored using both the Stoke system [20] for lumbar spine and the BASRI system [21], which includes hip involvement. The radiographs and reports will be requested and scored to be included in the rheumatology clinical dataset and the system will be rolled this out to the other centres.

Patient self-administered data (PAS cohort)

Many of the validated measures of disease severity in AS are patient-assessed indices, such as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) [22] and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) [23].

We have previously demonstrated that these patient self-administered severity questionnaires for AS can be delivered over the internet as well as by paper [24] and have used this system to conduct an internet-delivered RCT in AS [25]. We have adapted this methodology in the present study.

As a result of clinical pressures, these measures are currently not routinely collected by all rheumatologists. Therefore, all patients coming for an appointment with a rheumatologist will be asked to complete a paper-based questionnaire at the visit. As part of the process of consent to be included in the cohort, patients will be asked to consent to completing a questionnaire every 6 months, either online if they have internet access, or by post. The contents of the questionnaires are summarised in Table Table11.

Table 1
Summary of questionnaires

This data will be fed back into the clinical dataset (WARD) and will be available to the patients' rheumatologists to help inform the patients' ongoing clinical care. In addition, for those patients not registered with a rheumatologist in Wales, all consenting patients registered with the National Ankylosing Spondylitis Society (NASS) (http://www.nass.co.uk/) and those registered with participating GPs, will receive postal or internet versions of the questionnaire.

Questionnaire responses will be linked using the SAIL process.

A website has been developed to give access to the questionnaires (http://www.ashealth.co.uk/). It includes open access sections for news about the cohort project as well as AS issues in general. There is also a section giving factsheets about AS, a community page where members of the AS community can give information about themselves and a forum where members of the community can submit posts on any topic.

Within the site, there are pages restricted to people with AS who are willing to register. The site collects name and address data as well as the name of the participant's GP. This renders the resulting dataset linkable via the SAIL mechanism. GPs are written to and asked to confirm that the patients have AS.

Routine data sources

For the PAS cohort, the data collected on patients with a diagnosis of AS, as given by the rheumatologist, will be linked to other routinely collected datasets using the SAIL system. This linkage will allow us to follow the patient pathway through the NHS system both retrospectively and prospectively. Linkage with GP system data provides information about patients going back 10 years including; previous diagnosis, presenting symptoms, results of laboratory tests and previous medications. This dataset can be used to follow the patient at every visit to the GP and therefore record the development of associated conditions and co-medication. Linkage with in-patient data will record all hospital visits, surgery and treatment. Linkage with the mortality datasets will ensure the dataset remains relevant and can examine survival of included patients. Linkage with A&E datasets will give information on emergency visits. The linkage with the GP system can also identify patients who have a diagnosis of AS but are not currently seen by a rheumatologist in Wales. Before inclusion into the cohort, the GPs of these patients will be asked to confirm that AS has been diagnosed by a rheumatologist. This will allow us to gain a full picture of the spectrum of AS patients, including those living in Wales but seeing a specialist elsewhere and those whose AS is not severe enough to require specialist rheumatology follow-up. Therefore, the characterisation of AS patients, at all disease stages can be maximised by the routinely collected data held on them by the NHS and other public bodies using the existing SAIL databanks.

Ethics

PAS has been granted ethical approval by the London Research Ethics Committee (08/H0718/64).

Discussion

This cohort takes its participants from GPs (primary care practitioners) and rheumatologists. The study is supplemented by patient-supplied information in the form of a series of questionnaires. Patient consent is required to include patients in the cohort. In addition, consent is sought to link cohort participants to the existing databank of routinely collected data currently in the SAIL system. The ability to link cohort members anonymously to routinely collected data is one of the unique features of this cohort. GP data is widely used in research, and can give a wide range of information about treatment and associated conditions, but one must be aware of the various issues of data quality and completeness concerning primary care records [26]. Other sources of routine data such as in-patient and out-patient records can also be linked to the cohort and can help to enhance the data held on each patient.

The cohort will have immediate impact on giving an objective estimate of the cost of AS at each stage of the disease which will help inform the use of anti-TNF agents. This is of immediate importance to many patients who could benefit from these agents, once approved by NICE. Patients who potentially meet the NICE criteria for the anti-TNF agents could be easily identified as part of this cohort.

The existing routine data from the previous 10 years will enable retrospective cohort studies to identify early risk factors (such as early hip involvement [27]) for progression to severe AS (as defined by the need for surgery or disability benefit). These patients could then be selected for aggressive early treatment with anti-TNF agents.

The cohort can be used to rapidly identify potential patients for RCTs of anti-TNF agents and other new drugs. This cohort can be used to screen for specified inclusion criteria and estimate the numbers eligible for new trials in the area. This will facilitate recruitment as the individuals can be identified remotely and invited by their local rheumatologists or GP to participate in these studies. The process of screening and recruitment of participants to trials can then be significantly speeded up reducing the risk and cost to pharmaceutical companies, thereby leading to more efficient and cost-effective trials.

The collection of AS patients can inform the development of genetic work in this field and facilitate the development of potential vaccines and other targeted therapies as a follow on from this work. Therefore it will facilitate the UK participation within international consortiums on genetic research of inflammatory autoimmune conditions. Once established and phenotyped, it is intended that this cohort will be used for studies in conjunction with the rheumatology research networks established by the Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC). These future studies include the potential to link the data from this cohort with biological and genetic sample banks from consenting patients. There has been a long history of work looking at the genetics of AS in the UK. However, there is a bottle-neck in terms of identifying enough people to conduct repeat validation studies to confirm the importance of new regions of interest for susceptibility and severity genes. By far the largest study in AS genetics to date involved 1000 patients with AS and 1500 controls [28], while no genome-wide association study has yet been done in AS [29]. Historically, these studies have not tended to use patients from Wales for logistical reasons as it has previously been difficult to identify these patients. Therefore this well characterised cohort, together with the collection of newly diagnosed AS patients, would enhance the ability of researchers in the UK to conduct these validation studies. Linking genetic and biological samples with the routinely collected clinical data would also allow the investigation and identification of associations not possible by other means.

Phenotyping patients would include collecting measures that reflect the expression of the disease without describing the actual genetic make-up of the patient. In the case of AS, this would include; medically held data such as first symptoms, disease history and development, areas affected, co-disorders, severity, family history, age at onset, environmental data such as socio-economic status, physical activity levels, medications, inherent modifiers such as sex, ethnicity and finally biochemical/immunological measures from the laboratory such as markers for inflammation. Much of this data can be obtained from existing routine data and from the patient.

The cohort can be used to work with family members of AS patients in order to identify individuals at high risk of developing AS (such as the children of AS-affected women with a young age at onset [30]) to examine the early disease history of AS pre-diagnosis (using MRI scans) in order to examine interventions which may switch off or prevent AS.

This study therefore builds on and enhances existing UK resources and infrastructure. The methods used in this study are also relevant to other chronic conditions, and the PAS cohort is seen as a pilot for this strategy of phenotyping cohorts using the linkage of routine, clinical and patient-entered data.

This cohort will also allow easy collection of post-RCT and post-marketing surveillance data, which is crucial for new biologic agents whose long-term effects are unknown. The British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) is currently piloting measures and data collection for the development of a Disease Management Register for AS, including a biologics register [31] The PAS cohort could be used to directly contribute to and enhance this national register.

Thus, in conclusion the cohort can be used for a wide variety of research studies (burden/cost of disease, disease history, trial recruitment, genetic research, basic research of biological markers, and post trial surveillance). This is a pilot for undertaking the same method of cohort development in other chronic conditions.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

The protocol was conceived and designed by SB, SS, DVF and RAL with input from MBG, CP and KJ regarding analysis and data for collection. The first draft of the paper was written by MDA and subsequent drafts were amended and finally approved by all the authors.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/197/prepub

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Medical Research Council for funding this cohort development study. We thank Mrs Liz Irvine for managing the questionnaires and Ryan Lever for constructing the website and managing the data.

References

  • De Angelis R, Salaffi F, Grassi W. Prevalence of spondyloarthropathies in an Italian population sample: a regional community-based study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2007;36:14–21. doi: 10.1080/03009740600904243. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Calin A, Taurog J, (Eds) The spondyloarthritides. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  • Sweeney S, Gupta R, Taylor G, Calin A. Total hip arthroplasty in ankylosing spondylitis: outcome in 340 patients. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:1862–1866. [PubMed]
  • Lautermann D, Braun J. Ankylosing spondylitis - cardiac manifestations. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002;20(Suppl 28):S11–S15. [PubMed]
  • Vinsonneau U, Brondex A, Mansourati J, Saraux A, Cornily JC, Arlès F, Godon P, Quiniou G. Cardiovascular disease in patients with spondyloarthropathies. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75:18–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.04.011. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zeboulon N, Dougados M, Gossec L. Prevalence and characteristics of uveitis in the spondyloarthropathies: a systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:955–959. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.075754. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Baeten D, De Keyser F, Van Damme N, Veys EM, Mielants H. Influence of the gut and cytokine patterns in spondyloarthropathy. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002;20(Suppl 28):S38–S42. [PubMed]
  • Brophy S, Pavy S, Lewis P, Taylor G, Bradbury L, Robertson D, Lovell C, Calin A. Inflammatory eye, skin, and bowel disease in spondyloarthritis: genetic, phenotypic, and environmental factors. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:2667–2673. [PubMed]
  • Cooksey R, Brophy S, Gravenor MB, Brooks CJ, Burrows CL, Siebert S. Frequency and characteristics of disease flares in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology. 2010;49:929–932. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep435. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gran JT, Skomsvoll JF. The outcome of ankylosing spondylitis: a study of 100 patients. Br J Rheumatol. 1997;36:766–771. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.7.766. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chorus AMJ, Boonen A, Miedema HS, van der Linden SJ. Employment perspectives of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:693–699. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.8.693. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lyons RA, Jones KH, John G, Brooks CJ, Verplancke JP, Ford DV, Brown G, Leake K. The SAIL databank: linking multiple health and social care datasets. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2009;9:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ford DV, Jones KH, Verplancke JP, Lyons RA, John G, Brooks CJ, Thompson S, Bodger O, Couch T, Leake K. The SAIL databank: building a national architecture for e-health research and evaluation. BMC Health Services Research. 2009;9:157. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Davies H, Brophy S, Fielding A, Bingley P, Chandler M, Hilldrup I, Brooks C, Williams R. Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) in South Wales: incidence and characterization. Diabetic Medicine. 2008;25:1354–1357. [PubMed]
  • Button LA, Roberts SE, Goldacre MJ, Akbari A, Rodgers SE, Williams JG. Hospitalized prevalence and 5-year mortality for IBD: Record linkage study. World J Gastroent. 2010;16:431–438. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i4.431. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brooks CJ, Tang TS, Ford DV, Lyons RA, Price DE, Bain SC, Stephens JW. Are blood pressure levels taken during a secondary care diabetic clinic likely to be higher than when measured in primary care? Primary Care Diabetes. 2009;3:193–195. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.06.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • McGregor JI, Brooks CJ, Chalasani P, Chukwuma J, Hutchings H, Lyons RA, Lloyd K. The Health Informatics Trial Enhancement Project (HITE): Using routinely collected primary care data to identify potential participants for a depression trial. Trials. 2010;11:39. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brooks CJ, Stephens JW, Price DE, Ford DV, Lyons RA, Prior SL, Bain SC. Use of a patient linked data warehouse to facilitate diabetes trial recruitment from primary care. Primary Care Diabetes. 2009;3:245–248. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.06.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hill RA, Brophy S, Brunt H, Storey M, Thomas NE, Thornton CA, Palmer S, Dunstan F, Paranjothy S, McClure R, Rodgers SE, Lyons RA. Protocol of the baseline assessment for the Environments for Healthy Living (EHL) Wales cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-150. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Taylor HG, Wardle T, Beswick EJ, Dawes PT. The relationship of clinical and laboratory measurements to radiological change in ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol. 1991;30:330–335. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/30.5.330. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mackey K, Brophy S, Mack C, Doran M, Calin A. The development and validation of a radiographic grading system for the hip in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Hip index. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:2866–2872. [PubMed]
  • Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:2286–2291. [PubMed]
  • Calin A, Jones SD, Garrett SL, Kennedy LG. Bath ankylosing-spondylitis functional index. British J Rheumatol. 1995;34:793–794. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/34.8.793. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brophy S, Hunniford T, Taylor G, Menon A, Roussou T, Calin A. Assessment of disease severity (in terms of function) using the internet. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:1819–1822. [PubMed]
  • Brophy S, Burrows CL, Brooks C, Gravenor MB, Siebert S, Allen SJ. Internet-based randomised controlled trials for the evaluation of complementary and alternative medicines: probiotics in spondyloarthropathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Thiru K, Hassey A, Sullivan F. Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. BM J. 2003;326:1070. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1070. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brophy S, Mackay K, Al-Saidi A, Taylor G, Calin A. The natural history of ankylosing spondylitis as defined by radiological progression. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1236–1243. [PubMed]
  • Wellcome Trust Control Consortium; The Australo-Anglo-American Spondylitis Consortium. Association scan of 14,500 nonsynonymous SNPs in four diseases identifies autoimmunity variants. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1329–1337. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brown MA. Breakthroughs in genetic studies of ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology. 2008;47:132–137. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem269. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Calin A, Brophy S, Blake D. Impact of sex on inheritance of ankylosing spondylitis: a cohort study. Lancet. 1999;354:1687–1690. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03219-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • BSRBR. Ankylosing Spondylitis: Feasibility of a Disease management Register. BSR Biologics Register Newsletter; 2008. p. 5.http://www.medicine.manchester.ac.uk/arc/BSRBR/
  • Cheung K, Oemar M, Oppe M, Rabin R. EQ-5D user guide. Basic information on how to use EQ-5D. Rotterdam: EuroQol Group; 2009.
  • The International Physical Activity Questionnaire. http://www.ipaq.ki.se/ipaq.htm
  • Markland T, Tobin V. A Modification to the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire to Include an Assessment of Amotivation. J Sport Exercise Psychol. 2004;26:191–196.
  • Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF III, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research. 1989;28:193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2003;1:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lerner D, Amick BC III, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D. The Work Limitations Questionnaire: a self-administered instrument for assessing on-the-job work disability. Med Care. 2001;39:72–85. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200101000-00009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • WPAI general information, Reilly Associates. http://www.reillyassociates.net/
  • Reilly MC, Gooch KL, Wong RL, Kupper H, van der Heijde D. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology. 2010;49:812–819. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep457. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...