• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jcellbiolHomeThe Rockefeller University PressThis articleEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
J Cell Biol. Sep 6, 2010; 190(5): 867–879.
PMCID: PMC2935565
Article

microRNA-1 and microRNA-206 regulate skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and differentiation by repressing Pax7

Abstract

Skeletal muscle satellite cells are adult stem cells responsible for postnatal skeletal muscle growth and regeneration. Paired-box transcription factor Pax7 plays a central role in satellite cell survival, self-renewal, and proliferation. However, how Pax7 is regulated during the transition from proliferating satellite cells to differentiating myogenic progenitor cells is largely unknown. In this study, we find that miR-1 and miR-206 are sharply up-regulated during satellite cell differentiation and down-regulated after muscle injury. We show that miR-1 and miR-206 facilitate satellite cell differentiation by restricting their proliferative potential. We identify Pax7 as one of the direct regulatory targets of miR-1 and miR-206. Inhibition of miR-1 and miR-206 substantially enhances satellite cell proliferation and increases Pax7 protein level in vivo. Conversely, sustained Pax7 expression as a result of the loss of miR-1 and miR-206 repression elements at its 3′ untranslated region significantly inhibits myoblast differentiation. Therefore, our experiments suggest that microRNAs participate in a regulatory circuit that allows rapid gene program transitions from proliferation to differentiation.

Introduction

Postnatal growth and regeneration of skeletal muscle mainly depend on adult muscle stem cells, named satellite cells. Satellite cells are characterized by the expression of the paired-box transcription factor Pax7 (Buckingham, 2007; Kuang et al., 2008). Mouse genetics and cell culture studies reveal that Pax7 is required for satellite cell survival, proliferation, and to prevent precocious differentiation of myogenic progenitor cells (Oustanina et al., 2004; Kuang et al., 2006; Relaix et al., 2006; Zammit et al., 2006). Gene targeting studies show that satellite cells that lack Pax7 and its close homologue, Pax3, die or differentiate into cartilage and other cell types (Relaix et al., 2005). However, Pax3 and Pax7 have been shown to function upstream of MyoD to activate skeletal muscle gene expression and to initiate the myogenesis program (Relaix et al., 2006). However, sustained expression of Pax7 in satellite cells delays the onset of myogenesis, and elevated expression of Pax7 in primary myoblasts inhibits the expression of MyoD, preventing myogenin induction and muscle terminal differentiation (Olguin and Olwin, 2004; McFarlane et al., 2008). These studies suggest that Pax7 plays a dual role in satellite cell fate maintenance and myogenic progenitor cell differentiation. These observations further imply that precise regulation of Pax7 is crucial for satellite cell transition from proliferation/self-renewal to differentiation.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of ~22 nucleotide noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the posttranscriptional level. The involvement of miRNAs in muscle biology has recently been reported. miRNAs regulate the expression of transcription factors and signaling mediators important for cardiac and skeletal muscle development and function (Callis and Wang, 2008; van Rooij et al., 2008). Aberrant miRNA expression has been observed in muscle diseases, including cardiac and skeletal muscle hypertrophy, heart failure, and muscular dystrophy (Eisenberg et al., 2007; Tatsuguchi et al., 2007; Thum et al., 2007). We have previously shown that the expression of muscle-specific miR-1 and miR-133 is induced during skeletal muscle differentiation. We further demonstrated that miR-1 and miR-133 play central regulatory roles in myoblast proliferation and differentiation (Chen et al., 2006). Interestingly, miR-1 and miR-133 are also important regulators of cardiomyocyte differentiation and heart development (Zhao et al., 2007; Ivey et al., 2008).

As stem cells differentiate, they turn on lineage-specific genes while down-regulating stem cell maintenance genes in response to appropriate cues (Jaenisch and Young, 2008; Rossant, 2008). Although these maintenance genes are regulated mainly at the transcriptional level, remaining transcripts that were highly expressed in the previous stage need to be effectively silenced for optimal transition from one gene program to another. In this sense, miRNAs are well suited for clearing these residual messages. Genetic studies on the components of the miRNA biogenesis pathway indicate that Dicer and miRNAs are essential for embryonic stem cell survival and differentiation (Murchison et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2007). It was recently reported that a skin miRNA (miR-203) promotes the differentiation of skin progenitor cells by restricting cell proliferation and inducing cell cycle exit. miR-203 achieved this function by repressing p63, a key factor for skin stem cell fate maintenance (Yang et al., 1999; Senoo et al., 2007; Yi et al., 2008). Interestingly, muscle-specific miR-1 and miR-133 appear to play a role in cardiac differentiation from embryonic stem cells (Ivey et al., 2008). Together, these studies indicate that miRNAs could be previously unrecognized regulators of muscle progenitor cell proliferation, fate specification, and differentiation.

In this paper, we study the function of miRNAs in skeletal muscle satellite cells and their derived myogenic progenitor cells. We find that miR-1 and miR-206 are highly induced during satellite cell and primary myoblast differentiation. We show that miR-1 and miR-206 promote satellite cell differentiation and restrict their proliferative potential. We further identify Pax7 as one of the direct regulatory targets of miR-1 and miR-206. In vivo knockdown of endogenous miR-1 and miR-206 in neonatal mouse skeletal muscle substantially enhances satellite cell proliferation and increases Pax7 protein level. In contrast, loss of miR-1 and miR-206 repression leads to sustained Pax7 expression, which results in inhibition of myogenic progenitor cell differentiation. Together, our experiments uncover a key role of miRNAs in skeletal muscle satellite cells and myogenic progenitor cells in which miR-1 and miR-206 participate in a regulatory circuit that facilitates gene program transition from proliferation to differentiation.

Results

miRNAs are required for proper differentiation of satellite cells

To study the potential involvement of miRNAs in muscle stem cell differentiation, we first established a satellite cell in vitro differentiation system. Mouse skeletal muscle satellite cells were isolated from single myofibers of hind leg muscle of young adult mice. We carefully tested and compared two protocols for satellite cell isolation according to previous studies (see Materials and methods; Rosenblatt et al., 1995; Conboy and Rando, 2002; Shefer and Yablonka-Reuveni, 2005; Shinin et al., 2006). In our experiments, the protocol using extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle–derived myofibers yielded the purest single myofiber and satellite cell preparations. Satellite cell preparations were consistently >90% pure, as indicated by the expression of Pax7 and α7-integrin and the absence of myogenin or myosin heavy chain (MyHC) expression (Fig. S1). Therefore, in this study, we adopted the satellite cell isolation protocol from single myofibers of EDL muscle. Isolated satellite cells were maintained on collagen-coated plates, and they continued to proliferate without differentiation when cultured in the presence of basic FGF (bFGF). However, shortly after removal of bFGF and cultured in low-serum medium (differentiation condition), satellite cells quickly exited the cell cycle and initiated myogenic differentiation, a process that faithfully mimics the in vivo myogenesis process (Clegg et al., 1987; Templeton and Hauschka, 1992; Sabourin et al., 1999). The differentiation capacity of isolated satellite cells was confirmed by the expression of MyHC, a skeletal muscle terminal differentiation marker, upon differentiation induction (Fig. 1 A).

Figure 1.
miRNAs are required for skeletal muscle satellite cell differentiation in vitro. (A) Isolation and differentiation induction of satellite cells. Satellite cells under growth (0 h bFGF) or differentiation condition (48 h bFGF) were fixed and stained with ...

To assess the role of miRNAs in satellite cells, we isolated and cultured satellite cells from Dicerflox/flox mice, in which exons 22 and 23 of the Dicer gene had been flanked by loxP sequences (Murchison et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2008). Dicer encodes an RNase III endonuclease responsible for miRNA maturation; therefore, deletion of Dicer leads to depletion of all mature and functional miRNAs (Bernstein et al., 2001; Grishok et al., 2001). We infected the Dicerflox/flox satellite cells with adenoviruses that expressed either the Cre recombinase (Ad-Cre) or the controls LacZ- (Ad-LacZ) or GFP- (Ad-GFP; Fig. 1 B). 48 h after Ad-Cre infection, Dicer was deleted, and the expression of miRNAs was significantly decreased, as demonstrated by the decreased expression of miR-1, one of the most abundant miRNAs in skeletal muscle myoblasts and myotubes (Fig. 1, C and D). To assess the differentiation potential of the Dicer-null satellite cells, we switched the Ad-Cre–infected Dicerflox/flox satellite cells to differentiation medium (DM; Sabourin et al., 1999). Interestingly, we observed a significant loss of cell viability in Dicer-null satellite cells upon differentiation induction, as indicated by the increase of TUNEL-positive cells (Fig. S2, A and B). These observations are consistent with a previous study demonstrating that Dicer and miRNAs are required for stem cell survival (Bernstein et al., 2003).

We next investigated the effects of the Dicer mutation on satellite cell differentiation potential. We examined the expression of Pax7, myogenin, and MyHC in Ad-Cre or Ad-LacZ–transduced satellite cells under growth or differentiation conditions. Under the growth condition, in which both the Dicer-null and wild-type satellite cells were maintained at an undifferentiated state, we observed essentially no difference in Pax7 expression level (unpublished data). 12 h after being switched to the DM, satellite cells started to differentiate. We detected similar myogenin expression in both Dicer-null and wild-type satellite cells (unpublished data). These observations suggest that miRNAs are not required for the initiation of satellite cell differentiation. 24 h after switching to DM, control wild-type satellite cells further differentiated into myocytes, as indicated by the expression of MyHC proteins. However, very little MyHC expression was detected in Dicer-null cells (Fig. 1 E). 3 d after differentiation induction, robust myogenic differentiation was observed in control satellite cells, as demonstrated by multinucleated myotube formation and MyHC expression. However, Dicer-null satellite cells were unable to complete myogenic differentiation, as indicated by a much-reduced MyHC expression (Fig. 1 E) and absence of multinucleated myotube formation (Fig. 1, E and F). These data suggest that Dicer is essential for both survival and terminal differentiation of skeletal muscle satellite cells.

miRNA expression during satellite cell differentiation and skeletal muscle regeneration

To define the signature of miRNA expression in satellite cells and myogenic progenitor cells and to identify miRNAs that are responsive to satellite cell differentiation, we performed miRNA microarray analyses on satellite cells, which were grown in growth medium (GM) and satellite cells that had been switched to DM for 1 d to induce differentiation (Fig. 2 A). We also used RNA from normal adult mouse skeletal muscle as well as from injured muscle 3 d after cardiotoxin injection to identify the miRNA expression signature during muscle regeneration in vivo. It has been well established that injury stimulates satellite cells to reenter the cell cycle and undergo extensive proliferation and differentiation (Morgan and Partridge, 2003; Yan et al., 2003). Consistent with a previous study (Yan et al., 2003), molecular marker analyses confirmed that 3 d after cardiotoxin injection corresponds to a stage of active satellite cell proliferation (Fig. 2 B). miRNA microarray data revealed that a subset of miRNAs, including miR-1, miR-206, miR-133a, and miR-133b, were highly induced during satellite cell differentiation. Intriguingly, the expression of these miRNAs was markedly down-regulated in injured skeletal muscle where active muscle regeneration was occurring (Fig. 2 A, group I). Conversely, another set of miRNAs were highly induced in regenerating skeletal muscle, and their expression decreased in differentiating satellite cells. These included miR-21 and others (Fig. 2 A, group III). In addition, we found that the expression of some miRNAs was moderately increased in both differentiating satellite cells and regenerating skeletal muscle (Fig. 2 A, group II). These observations suggest that miRNAs are likely involved in the process of satellite cell proliferation, differentiation, and skeletal muscle regeneration.

Figure 2.
miRNA expression pattern during satellite cell differentiation and adult skeletal muscle regeneration. (A) Microarray analyses of miRNA expression in differentiating satellite cells or regenerating skeletal muscle. Bar graph indicates the fold change ...

Based on their high expression levels and dynamic change during satellite cell differentiation and muscle regeneration, we decided to focus on miR-1 and miR-206. Both miR-1 and miR-206 belong to the miRNA family of miR-1, and they share a high homology in their sequences (Griffiths-Jones, 2004). Both miR-1 and miR-206 contain identical “seed” sequences (bases 2–8 of the 5′ end of the miRNA), suggesting that they likely regulate the same or very similar target genes (Fig. 2 C). The induction of miR-1 and miR-206 expression during satellite cell differentiation was further confirmed by miRNA Northern blot analyses (Fig. 2 D). To precisely monitor the expression and action of these miRNAs at the single cell level in satellite cells, we used an miR-1 sensor, in which the complementary sequence for miR-1 was cloned downstream of a dsRed coding sequence (Chen et al., 2006). As a control sensor, the miR-1–binding sequence was mutated (miR-1 sensor M). When maintained in GM, similar dsRed expression levels were detected in both miR-1 sensor–expressed cells (miR-1 sensor) and control cells (miR-1 sensor M), indicating that miR-1 actually was nearly undetectable in undifferentiated satellite cells (Fig. 2 E, top). However, when satellite cells were switched into DM to induce to differentiation, the expression of dsRed was extinguished in miR-1 sensor cells, whereas control cells still exhibited strong dsRed (Fig. 2 E, bottom). These data further demonstrate that miR-1 actually is highly induced during satellite cell differentiation.

miR-1 and miR-206 restrict satellite cell proliferative potential and promote their differentiation

The sharp induction of miR-1 and miR-206 expression during the transition of satellite cells from proliferation to differentiation, as well as their decreased expression in regenerating skeletal muscle, prompted us to investigate the role of these miRNAs in satellite cells and satellite cell–derived myogenic progenitor cells. We hypothesized that miR-1 and miR-206 repress the satellite cell proliferation program, thus facilitating myogenic differentiation. To test this hypothesis, we prematurely overexpressed miR-1, miR-206, or both in isolated satellite cells using adenoviruses. We validated the expression of miR-1, miR-206, or both using Northern blot analyses (Fig. S2 and not depicted). BrdU incorporation experiments were performed to assess the proliferation of satellite cells. miR-1 and miR-206 strongly inhibited satellite cell proliferation, as indicated by significantly less BrdU incorporation in miRNA-overexpressing satellite cells in comparison with control cells (n = 3 independent isolation and infection; Fig. 3, A and B).

Figure 3.
miR-1 and miR-206 restrict the proliferative potential of satellite cells and enhance their differentiation. (A) Satellite cells were infected with either Ad–miR-1+206 or Ad-GFP (control) and pulsed with 10 µM BrdU for 1.5 h. 12 h later, ...

To further characterize the inhibition of satellite cell proliferative potential by miR-1 and miR-206, we performed satellite cell colony formation assays (Montarras et al., 2005; Shinin et al., 2006). We applied a retroviral expression system modified from previous studies (Miller and Rosman, 1989; Grez et al., 1990), in which genomic sequences encoding miR-1 and miR-206 were cloned upstream of a GFP cassette and were under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter, which directs the expression of miR-1, miR-206, and GFP simultaneously (Fig. S2 E). We also validated the expression and activity of these miRNAs using both RNA Northern blot analyses and miR-1 sensor (Fig. S2 and not depicted). Indeed, overexpression of miR-1 and miR-206 significantly inhibits colony formation by satellite cells. Approximately 18 h after the retroviral infection, a similar number of colonies and a similar number of cells within individual colonies were observed in the control and miR-1– and miR-206–infected satellite cells. At this stage, the majority of GFP-positive colonies exhibited single- or two-cell pattern when plated at a low density (Fig. 3, D and E). However, 72 h after the retroviral infection, significantly fewer colonies were formed in miR-1– and miR-206–infected satellite cells compared with the control (Fig. 3, C–E). In addition, we found that ~50% of colonies contained >20 cells in the control satellite cells. In contrast, the number of colonies that contained >20 cells were much less in miR-1– and miR-206–infected satellite cells (Fig. 3 E). These results indicate that miR-1 and miR-206 restrict satellite cell proliferation and colony formation.

To study the effect of miR-1 and miR-206 on satellite cell differentiation, we performed immunofluorescent staining using an antibody against MyHC at different time points after the initiation of satellite cell differentiation induction. Indeed, miR-1 and miR-206 accelerated satellite cell differentiation (Fig. 3 F). Quantitative analyses demonstrated that these changes are statistically significant (Fig. 3 G). Together, these data suggest that miR-1 and miR-206 restrict satellite cell proliferative potential and positively regulate satellite cell differentiation.

miR-1 and miR-206 restrict satellite cell proliferation in vivo

To investigate whether miR-1 and miR-206 also restrict the proliferative potential of satellite cells in vivo, we knocked down both miR-1 and miR-206 in the skeletal muscle of neonatal mice using miRNA antagomirs (Krutzfeldt et al., 2005; Yi et al., 2008). Administration of antagomir-1 and -206, but not PBS or mut–antagomir-1 and -206 (in which four mismatch mutations were introduced into each miRNA sequence), resulted in a profound decrease in the endogenous expression level of miR-1 and miR-206 in skeletal muscle (Fig. 4 A). Both intraperitoneal (IP) injection and intramuscular injection of antagomir-1 and -206 markedly abolished endogenous miR-1 and miR-206 in skeletal muscle (Fig. 4 and Fig. S3 A). The expression of miR-1 was also dramatically abolished in the heart after IP injection (but not intramuscular injection) of antagomir-1 (unpublished data). Most importantly, the expression level of miR-133, which is clustered with miR-1 in the mouse genome and is normally cotranscribed with miR-1, was unaffected by antagomir-1 and -206 under the same conditions (Fig. 4 A and Fig. S3), indicating that the action of antagomirs is highly specific.

Figure 4.
Knockdown of miR-1 and miR-206 increases the proliferation of satellite cells in vivo. (A) Northern blot analyses of total RNAs isolated from skeletal muscle 24 h after the last injection of RNA antagomirs against miR-1 and miR-206 (antagomir-1+206). ...

We examined the effects of miR-1 and miR-206 knockdown on mouse skeletal muscle development and satellite cell proliferation. We first performed BrdU incorporation experiments to label proliferating cells. Quantitative analyses revealed a significant increase in BrdU-positive cells in antagomir-1– and -206–treated skeletal muscle compared with control mut–antagomir-1– and -206–treated samples (Fig. 4, B and C), indicating that the knockdown of endogenous miR-1 and miR-206 indeed enhanced muscle cell proliferation. Consistent with the aforementioned observation, we found substantially more phospho–histone H3-positive cells in antagomir-1– and -206–treated muscle than in control muscle (Fig. 4, D and E). To further confirm the satellite cell identity of these proliferating cells in skeletal muscle, we examined the expression of Pax7, a well-defined marker for satellite cells, and found a significant increase in Pax7-positive cells in antagomir-1– and -206–treated skeletal muscle (Fig. 4, F and G; and Fig. S3). Quantitative analyses indicate that 88% of BrdU-positive cells were also positive for Pax7 in antagomir-1– and -206–treated skeletal muscle (Fig. S3 D). These in vivo results, together with our previous findings in which miR-1 and miR-206 inhibit satellite cell colony formation and proliferation in vitro, further support the view that miR-1 and miR-206 are key regulators of satellite cell proliferation.

Pax7 is a direct regulatory target of miR-1 and miR-206 during satellite cell differentiation

Pax7, a paired-box transcription factor, has been well established as a key regulator of satellite cell survival, self-renewal, and proliferation (Oustanina et al., 2004; Zammit et al., 2004; Relaix et al., 2006; McFarlane et al., 2008). The observation that overexpression of miR-1 and miR-206 in satellite cells dramatically inhibited colony formation and decreased the size of individual colonies prompted us to further examine the expression of Pax7 in miR-1– and miR-206–overexpressed satellite cells. Indeed, we observed an inverse correlation between the expression level of miR-1/miR-206 and Pax7 protein in satellite cell colonies (Fig. 5 A and Fig. S4), suggesting that miR-1 and miR-206 may participate in the repression of Pax7 protein expression. Parallel up-regulation of miR-1 and miR-206 and down-regulation of Pax7 during satellite cell differentiation led us to hypothesize that miR-1 and miR-206 directly inhibit Pax7 gene expression.

Figure 5.
Pax7 is a direct regulatory target of miR-1 and miR-206. (A) Confocal microscopic images of satellite cell colonies infected with retroviral vector expressing GFP–miR-1 and miR-206 or control (GFP only). Note that the expression of Pax7 is inversely ...

To test this hypothesis, we searched for miR-1 and miR-206 regulatory targets. Indeed, two putative miR-1– and miR-206–binding sites were identified in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR; of Pax7 mRNA; Fig. S5). Next, we performed luciferase reporter assays using a partial sequence of the Pax7 3′-UTR that contained both miR-1– and miR-206–binding sites (Fig. S5). Not surprisingly, miR-1, miR-206, or both strongly repressed Pax7 3′-UTR luciferase activity (Fig. 5 B). Introduction of mutations into these two miRNA-binding sites completely abolished miR-1 and miR-206–mediated repression, demonstrating the specificity of repression (Fig. 5 B). Furthermore, we tested whether miR-1 and miR-206 could reduce the endogenous Pax7 protein level in isolated satellite cells. Western blot analyses clearly demonstrate that miR-1 and miR-206 overexpression reduced Pax7 protein expression (Fig. 5 C). Interestingly, although we observed a significant repression of Pax7 protein by miR-1 and miR-206, the expression level of Pax7 mRNA only decreased slightly (Fig. 5 C), indicating that a posttranscriptional regulation of Pax7 expression is likely involved. Finally, we found that the Pax7 protein level was down-regulated during satellite cell differentiation (Fig. 5 D), which is consistent with previous observations (Olguin et al., 2007). Together, these results demonstrate that miR-1 and miR-206 directly regulate Pax7 protein expression posttranscriptionally.

miR-1 and miR-206–mediated repression of Pax7 is essential for myogenic progenitor cell differentiation

Pax7 plays a central role in satellite cell self-renewal and the initiation of the myogenic program (Oustanina et al., 2004; Zammit et al., 2004; Relaix et al., 2006). Intriguingly, it has also been observed that sustained expression of Pax7 in myogenic progenitor cells significantly represses myogenic terminal differentiation (Olguin and Olwin, 2004; McFarlane et al., 2008). We hypothesized that miR-1 and miR-206–mediated repression of Pax7 protein level through its 3′-UTR might be essential for the transition of myogenic progenitor cells from proliferation to differentiation. To test this hypothesis, we built two Pax7 expression constructs in which the 3′-UTR was either included or excluded (referred to as Pax7-UTR and Pax7, respectively); we also built another Pax7 expression construct in which both the miR-1 and miR-206 targeting sites in its 3′-UTR were mutated (referred to as Pax7-UTR–M; Fig. 6 A). We examined the effects of these Pax7 expression constructs on Pax7 protein expression and myoblast differentiation. To perform these experiments, we switched to the C2C12 myoblast cell line, which we could stably transfect with the indicated Pax7 expression constructs. Under the growth condition, where miR-1 and miR-206 expression was barely detected in myoblasts, the expression levels of Pax7 mRNAs and proteins were similar for all three Pax7 constructs (Fig. 6 B). However, under the differentiation condition, in which miR-1 and miR-206 are rapidly induced, the Pax7 protein expression level is significantly lower in Pax7-UTR–transfected cells compared with Pax7- or Pax7-UTR–M-transfected cells (Fig. 6, C and D). Importantly, we did not detect a significant difference in Pax7 mRNA levels when individual Pax7 expression constructs were stably expressed in myoblasts (Fig. 6 C), indicating that miR-1 and miR-206 contributed to the inhibition of Pax7 protein expression posttranscriptionally via its 3′-UTR. As expected, under the differentiation condition, stable cell lines with Pax7 and Pax7-UTR–M expression constructs showed profound inhibition of myoblast differentiation compared with cells that stably express Pax7-UTR, as indicated by a significant decrease in the expression of skeletal muscle differentiation marker genes, including myogenin, skeletal muscle α-actin, and MyHC (Fig. 6, C and D). Furthermore, we performed immunofluorescent staining to examine the effects of different forms of Pax7 expression constructs on myoblast differentiation. Consistently, myoblasts stably transfected with Pax7 or Pax7-UTR–M expression constructs displayed much less MyHC expression. In contrast, myoblasts stably transfected with the Pax7-UTR expression construct had comparable expression of MyHC with the control (Fig. 6 D), indicating that miR-1– and miR-206–mediated repression of Pax7 expression facilitates cell differentiation. Collectively, these data demonstrate that down-regulation of Pax7 by miR-1 and miR-206 is functionally significant for the progression of skeletal muscle progenitor cell differentiation.

Figure 6.
Functional significance of miR-1– and miR-206–mediated repression of Pax7 during myoblast differentiation. (A) Scheme of expression constructs including a control plasmid, Pax7 ORF only (Pax7), Pax7 with its 3′-UTR containing two ...

Discussion

In this study, we reveal a critical role of miR-1 and miR-206 in the repression of the proliferation of skeletal muscle satellite cells and their derived myogenic progenitor cells. We found that miR-1 and miR-206 are sharply up-regulated during satellite cell differentiation while strikingly decreased during skeletal muscle regeneration. Furthermore, we showed that premature overexpression of miR-1 and miR-206 restricts the proliferative potential of satellite cells and accelerates their myogenic differentiation. Conversely, satellite cell proliferation is increased when miR-1 and miR-206 are knocked down in skeletal muscle in vivo. Furthermore, we identified Pax7 as one of the regulatory targets of miR-1 and miR-206 during satellite cell proliferation and differentiation. We showed that down-regulation of Pax7 by these two miRNAs is crucial for proper muscle progenitor cell differentiation. Our observation that miR-1 and miR-206 facilitate satellite cell differentiation by limiting Pax7 expression implies that miRNAs may play a key role in accelerating the transition from cell proliferation to differentiation. Our conclusion is consistent with a recent study in which miR-203 was shown to promote skin progenitor cell differentiation by repressing the expression of P63, a key transcription factor for skin stem cell fate maintenance (Yi et al., 2008). It will be interesting to determine whether similar miRNA-mediated gene regulation mechanisms exist in other adult stem cells, such as adult neural stem cells and hematopoietic stem cells.

Recently, it was reported that the myogenic regulatory factors MyoD and myogenin inhibit the expression of Pax7 in skeletal muscle primary myoblasts during differentiation (Olguin et al., 2007). However, the molecular mechanism underlying this observation was not well defined. Our experiments, in which miR-1 and miR-206 repress Pax7 protein expression in differentiating muscle progenitor cells, offer an explanation. Pax7 is expressed in undifferentiated satellite cells and is required for the initial activation of Myf5 and MyoD when satellite cells are induced to differentiate and become myogenic progenitor cells. Activated MyoD in satellite cell–derived myogenic progenitor cells will then turn on miR-1 and miR-206 (Rao et al., 2006; Rosenberg et al., 2006). As a result, miR-1 and miR-206 will repress Pax7 posttranscriptionally. Given the essential dual roles of Pax7 in satellite cell self-renewal and myogenic terminal differentiation inhibition, we suggest that the repression of Pax7 protein levels in activated satellite cell–derived myogenic progenitor cells by miR-1 and miR-206 could be one of the major mechanisms through which miRNAs regulate satellite cell transition between self-renewal and differentiation (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.
Model of miR-1– and miR-206–mediated repression of Pax7 for satellite cell differentiation. Pax7 has multiple functions in satellite cell fate determination. One such role is to specify satellite cells into myogenic fate while preventing ...

We and others previously demonstrated that miR-1 and miR-206 promote skeletal muscle terminal differentiation (Chen et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2006; Rosenberg et al., 2006; Williams et al., 2009). One of the miR-1 regulatory targets that mediates miRNA function in myoblasts is HDAC4, an inhibitor of muscle differentiation. HDAC4 was also shown repressed by miR-206 (Lu et al., 2000; McKinsey et al., 2000; Chen et al., 2006; Williams et al., 2009). In this study, we further show that miR-1 and miR-206 repress transcription factor Pax7, therefore conferring robustness to the gene program transition from proliferation to differentiation in satellite cells. Interestingly, both miR-1 and miR-206 were sharply down-regulated in injured skeletal muscle, presumably to allow active satellite cell proliferation and regeneration. This study, together with our previous study (Chen et al., 2006), supports the view that miRNAs may regulate multiple mRNA targets that encode proteins with related functions (Leung and Sharp, 2007). A recent study showed that miR-27 represses the expression level of Pax3, another important transcription regulator for satellite cells and myogenic progenitor cells, thereby enhancing the myogenic differentiation program (Crist et al., 2009). It will be important to identify and study additional miR-1 and miR-206 regulatory targets in skeletal muscle, which will be essential to further our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of miRNA function. Intriguingly, the expression of miR-133 was also found to be increased in differentiated satellite cells and decreased in injured skeletal muscle, similar to the expression patterns of miR-1 and miR-206. We and others have reported that miR-1 and miR-133 are cotranscribed in cardiac and skeletal muscle on a polycistronic primary transcript. Unlike miR-1, which strongly promotes myoblast differentiation, miR-133 inhibits myoblast differentiation and enhances proliferation (Chen et al., 2006). Similar observations were also reported in embryonic stem cells that were induced to differentiate into cardiomyocytes (Ivey et al., 2008). It will be important to determine whether miR-133 affects satellite cell proliferation and differentiation processes, and if so, investigate the downstream regulatory targets that mediate such function. In addition, it will be interesting to explore whether similar miR-1 regulatory targets and molecular mechanisms exist in cardiomyocytes, where miR-1 is also highly expressed.

In summary, our findings demonstrate that miR-1 and miR-206 regulate the transition of skeletal muscle satellite cells from proliferation to differentiation. They do so, at least partially, by limiting and refining the expression of important genes that are responsible for the maintenance of adult stem cells in an undifferentiated, self-renewing state. In this manner, miRNAs confer robustness to participate in a feed-forward genetic circuit that reinforces satellite cell commitment from self-renewal to myogenic differentiation. Therefore, miRNAs could be therapeutic tools and targets for human skeletal muscle disease.

Materials and methods

Mice, satellite cell isolations, and cell cultures

Mice carrying the Dicer floxed allele (Dicerflox/flox) were described previously (Murchison et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2008). Single fibers and associated satellite cells were prepared from EDL muscles as described previously (Rosenblatt et al., 1995; Conboy and Rando, 2002; Shefer and Yablonka-Reuveni, 2005; Shinin et al., 2006). Primary isolated satellite cells were plated on collagen-coated dishes (Roche) in Ham’s F-10 medium (Invitrogen) containing 20% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% penicillin/strep, and fed with 5.0 ng/ml bFGF (Invitrogen). The identity of satellite cells was determined by the expression of Pax7 proteins. Satellite cell differentiation was induced culturing in F-10 with 2% horse serum lacking bFGF or FBS as described previously (Frock et al., 2006).

For satellite cell colony formation assays, isolated satellite cells from single myofibers were plated on poly-d-lysine–coated dishes (Sigma-Aldrich) at ~100 cells/cm2 for overnight culture. Satellite cells were infected by retroviruses and cultured overnight before selection using puromycin at 10 µg /ml concentration. GFP-positive cells and single cell–derived colonies were counted at 18, 40, or 72 h after the infections.

C2C12 myoblasts were maintained at subconfluent densities in DME supplemented with 20% FBS (GM). Myogenic differentiation was induced by changing subconfluent cells to DME containing 2% heat-inactivated horse serum (DM; Chen et al., 2006). To examine the effect of Pax7 expression on myoblast differentiation, C2C12 myoblasts were transfected with control, Pax7, Pax7-UTR, or Pax7-UTR–M expression constructs and cultured for 12 h under growth condition after transfection. They were then selected using puromycin at 10 µg/ml for 7 d. Stable cell lines were maintained on GM plus 5 µg /ml puromycin. The expression of Pax7 and myogenic markers was examined using RT-PCR and/or Western blot analyses. The stable cell lines harboring different Pax7 expression constructs were switched to DM for 36 h before immunostaining or Western blot analyses.

Generation of adenoviral vectors, retroviral vectors, and cell infection

Ad-Cre, Ad-LacZ, and Ad-GFP adenoviruses were provided by the University of North Carolina vector core. Ad–miR-1, Ad–miR-206, and Ad–miR-1/miR-206 vectors were generated using standard molecular biology techniques. High-titer viruses were prepared as described previously (He et al., 1998) and purified using ViraBind Adenovirus Purification kit (Cell Biolabs, Inc.). For cell transfection, satellite cells were cultured for 2 d in GM in the presence of bFGF. They were infected with adenoviruses at 37°C at a multiplicity of infection of 20–80 for 12 h. Cells were maintained on GM for 2–3 additional days before immunofluorescent staining. Alternatively, cells were induced to differentiate in DME medium with 2% horse serum for the duration of the time indicated in Figs. 17. Myogenesis was analyzed by immunostaining, RT-PCR, or Western blot analysis with indicated markers.

To generate retroviral miR-1, miR-206, and miR-1/miR-206 constructs, the murine stem cell virus vector (MaRX IVfPuro) was modified to carry splicing donor and splicing acceptor sequences where miRNA precursor sequences were inserted (provided by S. Hammond, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Fig. S2). The retroviral vectors were generated using standard molecular biology techniques according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. 293 lupus erythematosus cells were transfected with 6 µg retroviral vectors, 3 µg envelope plasmids, and 3 µg gag-pol plasmids (Fugene6; Roche). Viral supernatants from 293LE cells were filtered through a 0.2 µm syringe and subsequently used to infect satellite cells as described previously (Springer and Blau, 1997). In brief, growing satellite cells were immersed in viral supernatant in the presence of 20% FBS, 8 µg /ml polybrene, and 5.0 ng/ml bFGF, returned to the CO2 incubator for 15 min, and the dish was centrifuged at 32°C for 30 min at 1,100 g. After centrifugation, satellite cells were replaced with fresh GM containing 20% FBS and 5.0 ng/ml bFGF and cultured overnight before selection using puromycin at 10 µg/ml concentration. Satellite cells were maintained on selection medium for an additional 4 d before analysis.

miRNA microarray, Northern blot, and RT-PCR analysis

miRNA microarray, Northern blot, and RT-PCR assays were performed as described previously (Chen et al., 2006). 5 µg and 10 µg total RNAs isolated from skeletal muscle satellite cells were used for microarray and Northern blot assays, respectively.

Proliferation and differentiation assay, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot analysis

To measure cell proliferation, satellite cells infected with adenoviruses were maintained on GM for 48 h, pulsed with 10 µM BrdU (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1.5 h, and fixed for immunostaining using anti-BrdU antibody at 1:1,000 dilution (A21300; Invitrogen). To examine the expression level of endogenous Pax7 in satellite cells after overexpression of miR-1 and miR-206, retroviral miR-1– and miR-206–infected satellite cells were cultured under 10 µg /ml puromycin selection for 4 d before immunostaining or Western blotting using Pax7 antibody at 1:100 dilution (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank [DSHB], University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA). To examine myogenic differentiation of satellite cells after the removal of bFGF and FBS, retroviral miR-1– and miR-206–infected cells, induced to differentiate at different time points, were fixed for immunostaining using the MF20 antibody, which recognizes MyHC proteins (DSHB, University of Iowa). The following antibodies and conditions were used for immunostaining and Western blot analyses for C2C12 myoblasts: MF20, 1:20 dilution in immunostaining and 1:100 dilution in Western blotting; myogenin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), 1:200 dilution; Flag (F7425; Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit polyclonal at 1:400 dilution.

Histological processing and immunochemical staining of skeletal muscle tissues were performed as described previously (Yan et al., 2003). Skeletal muscle tissues were embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound before 10 µm cyrosectioning (Chen et al., 2008). For costaining of Pax7 and BrdU, M.O.M. blocking kit (Vector Laboratories) and avidin/biotin blocking kit (Vector Laboratories) were used to stain muscle sections. The primary antibodies used were Pax7 (DSHB, University of Iowa) and biotin-BrdU (Invitrogen). The secondary antibodies used were avidin-FITC and Alex Fluor 594 goat anti–mouse IgG (Invitrogen). All images were acquired by a camera (UFX-DX; Nikon) mounted on an inverted (TE2000; Nikon) or upright fluorescence microscope (Microphot-SA; Nikon). Digital fluorescent images were captured at room temperature with a Plan Fluor air 10× NA 0.30, Plan Fluor air 20× NA 0.45, or Plan Fluor air 40× NA 0.60 objective lens using the least possible exposure to minimize bleaching. Confocal microscopic images (Figs. 35 and Fig. S3) were captured using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (FV 500; Olympus) with a Plan Apochromat 63× NA 1.40 oil objective lens (Microscopy Service Laboratory, University of North Carolina). The images were processed using SPOT (version 3.5.4 for MacOS; Diagnostic Instruments, Inc.) software and were scaled down and cropped in Photoshop (Adobe) to prepare the final figures.

TUNEL assay

Satellite cells carrying Dicerflox/flox alleles were isolated using the same protocol as described for wild-type satellite cell isolation. Isolated Dicerflox/flox satellite cells were infected with Ad-Cre or Ad-LacZ (as a control) for 12 h. Ad-LacZ– or Ad-Cre–infected Dicerflox/flox satellite cells were cultured under growth condition for an additional 72 h and switched to differentiation condition for 5 h before TUNEL assay. TUNEL assays were performed using ApopTaq Fluorescein in situ Apoptosis Detection kit (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Antagomir synthesis and injection

Antagomir-1, mut–antagomir-1, antagomir-206, and mut–antagomir-206 were designed and synthesized (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as described previously (Krutzfeldt et al., 2005). The antagomir-1 sequence was 5′-*mA*mAmUmAmCmAmUmAmCmUmUmCmUmUmUmAmCmAmU*mU*mC*mC*mAChl-3′, and the mut–antagomir-1 sequence was 5′-*mA*mAmUmcmCmAmUmgmCmUmcmCmUmUmUmAmCmAmg*mU*mC*mC*mAChl-3′. The antagomir-206 sequence was 5′-*mA*mCmCmAmCmAmCmAmCmUmUmCmCmUmUmAmCmAmU*mU*mC*mC*mAChl-3′, and the mut–antagomir-206 sequence was 5′-*mA*mCmCmcmCmAmCmgmCmUmcmCmCmUmUmAmCmAmg*mU*mC*mC*mAChl-3′. Lowercase letters represent the mismatched sequence, “m” represents the 2’-O-methyl–modified nucleotide, “*” indicate a phosphorothioate linkage, and “Chl” indicates cholesterol linked through a hydroxyprolinol linkage. IP or intramuscular injection was performed on postnatal day 3 C57BL/6J mice. Antagomirs or controls were administrated twice at a dose of 80 mg/kg body weight in 0.01 ml/injection on every other day. Animals were sacrificed 24 h after the last injection for experimental analysis.

Online supplemental material

Fig. S1 shows the isolation and phenotypic characterization of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Fig. S2 shows that Dicer-depleted satellite cells exhibit higher rate of apoptosis in response to serum withdrawal. Fig. S2 also shows miR-1 sensor and retroviral vector expressing miR-1 and miR-206. Fig. S3 shows increased Pax7-positive satellite cells in antagomirs-1– and -206–treated skeletal muscle. Fig. S4 shows that miR-1 and miR-206 inhibit endogenous Pax7 protein expression. Fig. S5 shows the 3′-UTR of Pax7 transcript containing two binding sites for miR-1 and miR-206. Online supplemental material is available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200911036/DC1.

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the Wang laboratory for discussion and support, Xiaoyun Hu for excellent technical support, Kirk McNaughton for histology, Scott Hammond for help with miRNA microarrays, and Gregory Hannon (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) for Dicer-flox mice. We thank Bill Pu, Mark Majesky, and Xuefei Wang for careful reading of the manuscript.

This work was supported by the March of Dimes Birth Defect Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Muscular Dystrophy Association. Z. Deng is supported by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (grant 30772211). D.Z. Wang is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association.

Footnotes

Abbreviations used in this paper:

bFGF
basic FGF
DM
differentiation medium
EDL
extensor digitorum longus
GM
growth medium
IP
intraperitoneal
miRNA
microRNA
MyHC
myosin heavy chain
UTR
untranslated region

References

  • Bernstein E., Caudy A.A., Hammond S.M., Hannon G.J. 2001. Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature. 409:363–366 10.1038/35053110 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bernstein E., Kim S.Y., Carmell M.A., Murchison E.P., Alcorn H., Li M.Z., Mills A.A., Elledge S.J., Anderson K.V., Hannon G.J. 2003. Dicer is essential for mouse development. Nat. Genet. 35:215–217 10.1038/ng1253 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Buckingham M. 2007. Skeletal muscle progenitor cells and the role of Pax genes. C. R. Biol. 330:530–533 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.03.015 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Callis T.E., Wang D.Z. 2008. Taking microRNAs to heart. Trends Mol. Med. 14:254–260 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.03.006 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chen J.F., Mandel E.M., Thomson J.M., Wu Q., Callis T.E., Hammond S.M., Conlon F.L., Wang D.Z. 2006. The role of microRNA-1 and microRNA-133 in skeletal muscle proliferation and differentiation. Nat. Genet. 38:228–233 10.1038/ng1725 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chen J.F., Murchison E.P., Tang R., Callis T.E., Tatsuguchi M., Deng Z., Rojas M., Hammond S.M., Schneider M.D., Selzman C.H., et al. 2008. Targeted deletion of Dicer in the heart leads to dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:2111–2116 10.1073/pnas.0710228105 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Clegg C.H., Linkhart T.A., Olwin B.B., Hauschka S.D. 1987. Growth factor control of skeletal muscle differentiation: commitment to terminal differentiation occurs in G1 phase and is repressed by fibroblast growth factor. J. Cell Biol. 105:949–956 10.1083/jcb.105.2.949 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Conboy I.M., Rando T.A. 2002. The regulation of Notch signaling controls satellite cell activation and cell fate determination in postnatal myogenesis. Dev. Cell. 3:397–409 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00254-X [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Crist C.G., Montarras D., Pallafacchina G., Rocancourt D., Cumano A., Conway S.J., Buckingham M. 2009. Muscle stem cell behavior is modified by microRNA-27 regulation of Pax3 expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106:13383–13387 10.1073/pnas.0900210106 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Eisenberg I., Eran A., Nishino I., Moggio M., Lamperti C., Amato A.A., Lidov H.G., Kang P.B., North K.N., Mitrani-Rosenbaum S., et al. 2007. Distinctive patterns of microRNA expression in primary muscular disorders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:17016–17021 10.1073/pnas.0708115104 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Frock R.L., Kudlow B.A., Evans A.M., Jameson S.A., Hauschka S.D., Kennedy B.K. 2006. Lamin A/C and emerin are critical for skeletal muscle satellite cell differentiation. Genes Dev. 20:486–500 10.1101/gad.1364906 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Grez M., Akgün E., Hilberg F., Ostertag W. 1990. Embryonic stem cell virus, a recombinant murine retrovirus with expression in embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:9202–9206 10.1073/pnas.87.23.9202 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Griffiths-Jones S. 2004. The microRNA Registry. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:D109–D111 10.1093/nar/gkh023 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Grishok A., Pasquinelli A.E., Conte D., Li N., Parrish S., Ha I., Baillie D.L., Fire A., Ruvkun G., Mello C.C. 2001. Genes and mechanisms related to RNA interference regulate expression of the small temporal RNAs that control C. elegans developmental timing. Cell. 106:23–34 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00431-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • He T.C., Zhou S., da Costa L.T., Yu J., Kinzler K.W., Vogelstein B. 1998. A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:2509–2514 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2509 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ivey K.N., Muth A., Arnold J., King F.W., Yeh R.F., Fish J.E., Hsiao E.C., Schwartz R.J., Conklin B.R., Bernstein H.S., Srivastava D. 2008. MicroRNA regulation of cell lineages in mouse and human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2:219–229 10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.016 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jaenisch R., Young R. 2008. Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell. 132:567–582 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.015 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kim H.K., Lee Y.S., Sivaprasad U., Malhotra A., Dutta A. 2006. Muscle-specific microRNA miR-206 promotes muscle differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 174:677–687 10.1083/jcb.200603008 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Krützfeldt J., Rajewsky N., Braich R., Rajeev K.G., Tuschl T., Manoharan M., Stoffel M. 2005. Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’. Nature. 438:685–689 10.1038/nature04303 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kuang S., Chargé S.B., Seale P., Huh M., Rudnicki M.A. 2006. Distinct roles for Pax7 and Pax3 in adult regenerative myogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 172:103–113 10.1083/jcb.200508001 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kuang S., Gillespie M.A., Rudnicki M.A. 2008. Niche regulation of muscle satellite cell self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2:22–31 10.1016/j.stem.2007.12.012 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Leung A.K., Sharp P.A. 2007. microRNAs: a safeguard against turmoil? Cell. 130:581–585 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.010 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lu J., McKinsey T.A., Zhang C.L., Olson E.N. 2000. Regulation of skeletal myogenesis by association of the MEF2 transcription factor with class II histone deacetylases. Mol. Cell. 6:233–244 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00025-3 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • McFarlane C., Hennebry A., Thomas M., Plummer E., Ling N., Sharma M., Kambadur R. 2008. Myostatin signals through Pax7 to regulate satellite cell self-renewal. Exp. Cell Res. 314:317–329 [PubMed]
  • McKinsey T.A., Zhang C.L., Lu J., Olson E.N. 2000. Signal-dependent nuclear export of a histone deacetylase regulates muscle differentiation. Nature. 408:106–111 10.1038/35040593 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Miller A.D., Rosman G.J. 1989. Improved retroviral vectors for gene transfer and expression. Biotechniques. 7:980–982: 984–986: 989–990 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Montarras D., Morgan J., Collins C., Relaix F., Zaffran S., Cumano A., Partridge T., Buckingham M. 2005. Direct isolation of satellite cells for skeletal muscle regeneration. Science. 309:2064–2067 10.1126/science.1114758 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Morgan J.E., Partridge T.A. 2003. Muscle satellite cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 35:1151–1156 10.1016/S1357-2725(03)00042-6 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Murchison E.P., Partridge J.F., Tam O.H., Cheloufi S., Hannon G.J. 2005. Characterization of Dicer-deficient murine embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:12135–12140 10.1073/pnas.0505479102 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Olguin H.C., Olwin B.B. 2004. Pax-7 up-regulation inhibits myogenesis and cell cycle progression in satellite cells: a potential mechanism for self-renewal. Dev. Biol. 275:375–388 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.08.015 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Olguin H.C., Yang Z., Tapscott S.J., Olwin B.B. 2007. Reciprocal inhibition between Pax7 and muscle regulatory factors modulates myogenic cell fate determination. J. Cell Biol. 177:769–779 10.1083/jcb.200608122 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Oustanina S., Hause G., Braun T. 2004. Pax7 directs postnatal renewal and propagation of myogenic satellite cells but not their specification. EMBO J. 23:3430–3439 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600346 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rao P.K., Kumar R.M., Farkhondeh M., Baskerville S., Lodish H.F. 2006. Myogenic factors that regulate expression of muscle-specific microRNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:8721–8726 10.1073/pnas.0602831103 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Relaix F., Rocancourt D., Mansouri A., Buckingham M. 2005. A Pax3/Pax7-dependent population of skeletal muscle progenitor cells. Nature. 435:948–953 10.1038/nature03594 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Relaix F., Montarras D., Zaffran S., Gayraud-Morel B., Rocancourt D., Tajbakhsh S., Mansouri A., Cumano A., Buckingham M. 2006. Pax3 and Pax7 have distinct and overlapping functions in adult muscle progenitor cells. J. Cell Biol. 172:91–102 10.1083/jcb.200508044 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rosenberg M.I., Georges S.A., Asawachaicharn A., Analau E., Tapscott S.J. 2006. MyoD inhibits Fstl1 and Utrn expression by inducing transcription of miR-206. J. Cell Biol. 175:77–85 10.1083/jcb.200603039 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rosenblatt J.D., Lunt A.I., Parry D.J., Partridge T.A. 1995. Culturing satellite cells from living single muscle fiber explants. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 31:773–779 10.1007/BF02634119 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rossant J. 2008. Stem cells and early lineage development. Cell. 132:527–531 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.039 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sabourin L.A., Girgis-Gabardo A., Seale P., Asakura A., Rudnicki M.A. 1999. Reduced differentiation potential of primary MyoD−/− myogenic cells derived from adult skeletal muscle. J. Cell Biol. 144:631–643 10.1083/jcb.144.4.631 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Senoo M., Pinto F., Crum C.P., McKeon F. 2007. p63 Is essential for the proliferative potential of stem cells in stratified epithelia. Cell. 129:523–536 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.045 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Shefer G., Yablonka-Reuveni Z. 2005. Isolation and culture of skeletal muscle myofibers as a means to analyze satellite cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 290:281–304 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shinin V., Gayraud-Morel B., Gomès D., Tajbakhsh S. 2006. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:677–687 10.1038/ncb1425 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Springer M.L., Blau H.M. 1997. High-efficiency retroviral infection of primary myoblasts. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 23:203–209 10.1007/BF02721371 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tatsuguchi M., Seok H.Y., Callis T.E., Thomson J.M., Chen J.F., Newman M., Rojas M., Hammond S.M., Wang D.Z. 2007. Expression of microRNAs is dynamically regulated during cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 42:1137–1141 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.04.004 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Templeton T.J., Hauschka S.D. 1992. FGF-mediated aspects of skeletal muscle growth and differentiation are controlled by a high affinity receptor, FGFR1. Dev. Biol. 154:169–181 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90057-N [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Thum T., Galuppo P., Wolf C., Fiedler J., Kneitz S., van Laake L.W., Doevendans P.A., Mummery C.L., Borlak J., Haverich A., et al. 2007. MicroRNAs in the human heart: a clue to fetal gene reprogramming in heart failure. Circulation. 116:258–267 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.687947 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • van Rooij E., Liu N., Olson E.N. 2008. MicroRNAs flex their muscles. Trends Genet. 24:159–166 10.1016/j.tig.2008.01.007 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang Y., Medvid R., Melton C., Jaenisch R., Blelloch R. 2007. DGCR8 is essential for microRNA biogenesis and silencing of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat. Genet. 39:380–385 10.1038/ng1969 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Williams A.H., Valdez G., Moresi V., Qi X., McAnally J., Elliott J.L., Bassel-Duby R., Sanes J.R., Olson E.N. 2009. MicroRNA-206 delays ALS progression and promotes regeneration of neuromuscular synapses in mice. Science. 326:1549–1554 10.1126/science.1181046 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yan Z., Choi S., Liu X., Zhang M., Schageman J.J., Lee S.Y., Hart R., Lin L., Thurmond F.A., Williams R.S. 2003. Highly coordinated gene regulation in mouse skeletal muscle regeneration. J. Biol. Chem. 278:8826–8836 10.1074/jbc.M209879200 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yang A., Schweitzer R., Sun D., Kaghad M., Walker N., Bronson R.T., Tabin C., Sharpe A., Caput D., Crum C., McKeon F. 1999. p63 is essential for regenerative proliferation in limb, craniofacial and epithelial development. Nature. 398:714–718 10.1038/19539 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yi R., Poy M.N., Stoffel M., Fuchs E. 2008. A skin microRNA promotes differentiation by repressing ‘stemness’. Nature. 452:225–229 10.1038/nature06642 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zammit P.S., Golding J.P., Nagata Y., Hudon V., Partridge T.A., Beauchamp J.R. 2004. Muscle satellite cells adopt divergent fates: a mechanism for self-renewal? J. Cell Biol. 166:347–357 10.1083/jcb.200312007 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zammit P.S., Relaix F., Nagata Y., Ruiz A.P., Collins C.A., Partridge T.A., Beauchamp J.R. 2006. Pax7 and myogenic progression in skeletal muscle satellite cells. J. Cell Sci. 119:1824–1832 10.1242/jcs.02908 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhao Y., Ransom J.F., Li A., Vedantham V., von Drehle M., Muth A.N., Tsuchihashi T., McManus M.T., Schwartz R.J., Srivastava D. 2007. Dysregulation of cardiogenesis, cardiac conduction, and cell cycle in mice lacking miRNA-1-2. Cell. 129:303–317 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.030 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Gene
    Gene
    Gene links
  • GEO Profiles
    GEO Profiles
    Related GEO records
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Nucleotide
    Nucleotide
    Published Nucleotide sequences
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...