• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Med Vet Entomol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jun 1, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2921613

Biological cost of tolerance to heavy metals in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae


The global rate of heavy metal pollution is rapidly increasing in different habitats. Anopheles malaria vector species appear to tolerate many aquatic habitats with metal pollutants, despite their normal proclivity for ‘clean’ water (i.e., generally water free of organic matter). Investigations were conducted to establish whether there are biological costs for tolerance to heavy metals in Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto (Diptera: Culicidae), and to assess the potential impact of heavy metal pollution on mosquito ecology. Anopheles gambiae s.s. were selected for cadmium, copper or lead tolerance through chronic exposure of immature stages to solutions of the metals for three successive generations. Biological costs were assessed in the fourth generation by horizontal life table analysis. Tolerance in larvae to cadmium (as cadmium chloride, CdCl2), copper (as copper II nitrate hydrate, (Cu (NO3)2. 2·5H2O) and lead (as lead II nitrate, (Pb (NO3)2), monitored by changes in LC50 concentrations of the metals, changed from, 6.07, 12.42 and 493.32 μg/L to 4.45, 25.02 and 516.69 μg/L, respectively, after 3 generations of exposure. The metal-selected strains had a significantly lower magnitude of egg viability, larval and pupal survivorship, adult emergence, fecundity and net reproductive rate than the control strain. The population doubling times were significantly longer and the instantaneous birth rates lower in most metal-selected strains relative to the control strain. Our results suggest that although An. gambiae s.s. displays the potential to develop tolerance to heavy metals, particularly copper, this may occur at a significant biological cost, which can adversely affect its ecological fitness.

Keywords: Anopheles gambiae, biological cost, cadmium, copper, heavy metals, lead, tolerance


Urban settings represent potentially permanent hot spots for malaria vector production and malaria transmission in Africa (Matthys et al., 2006; Afrane et al., 2004; Robert et al., 1998; Trape & Zoulani, 1987). Growing evidence suggests that Anopheles gambiae Giles s.s, the most prolific African malaria vector, is expanding its ecological niche into polluted habitats. Recent studies found An. gambiae larvae thriving in a variety of anthropogenic urban water bodies, which contained pollution from domestic and/or industrial sewage (Djouaka et al., 2007; Awolola et al., 2007), including heavy metals in excess of natural loads (Mireji et al., 2008). These mosquito larvae appear to have increased their tolerance, and possibly developed resistance, to the pollutants in their natural habitats.

Adaptation of this mosquito to the urban environment is a real threat that can seriously impact the health of the population. However, environmental changes and subsequent adaptation can have consequences on biological fitness of the mosquito (Reed et al., 2003), especially if inherited resistance to selecting agents such as heavy metals develops (Orr, 1998). In the absence of compensatory secondary mutations (Levin et al., 2000), the cost would be reflected in a decline of tolerant individuals in environments devoid of heavy metals; these individuals could be displaced by naïve populations with greater reproductive and growth rates (Agnew et al., 2004).

The purpose of this study was to determine if An. gambiae s.s. populations exhibit a natural range of tolerances to the toxic effects of heavy metals, or if the degree of tolerance can be increased under selection pressure. We hypothesized that the tolerance to heavy metals we observed in wild An. gambiae s.s. populations (Mireji et al., 2008) has an adverse effect on the biological fitness of the affected mosquito populations. Results could demonstrate the existence of a genetically controlled mechanism of resistance to heavy metals. A second aim was to define biological costs of tolerance to heavy metals in An. gambiae s.s. following generational selection by cadmium, copper or lead.

Materials and methods

Heavy metals

Cadmium, copper and lead were used in the following forms: cadmium chloride (CdCl2) 99.99% pure, copper II nitrate hydrate (Cu (NO3) 2. 2·5H2O) >99 % pure and lead II nitrate (Pb (NO3)2) 99.5% pure analytical salts, sourced from Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, U.S.A., Sigma-Aldrich, Laborchemikalien, GMBH, Germany and Prolabo, Fontenay, France, respectively.

Test insects

Anopheles gambiae s.s. mosquitoes were obtained from a colony kept by the International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi Kenya. This colony was originally collected from Mbita field station (00.025’S, 34.013’E), South Nyanza province, Kenya in December, 2000, where An. gambiae s.s. is abundant in nature. At the time of this work, the colony was in the 35th filial generation post-field sampling. To our knowledge, the mosquitoes had not been exposed knowingly to heavy metals.

Mosquito rearing

Standard procedures for rearing Anopheles mosquitoes were followed (Ford & Green, 1972). All life stages were reared in an insectary under controlled environmental conditions (28 ± 2°C, 75 – 80 % RH and LD 12: 12 h photoperiod) in the Animal Rearing and Quarantine Unit (ARQU) of ICIPE, Nairobi, Kenya. From the day of emergence, adult mosquitoes were provided with cotton wool soaked in a 10% sugar solution. Female mosquitoes were blood-fed on anaesthetized mice. Larvae were fed pulverized Tetramin fish food (Tetra GmbH, Melle, Germany). Approval for feeding mosquitoes on mice was obtained from the Kenya National Ethical Review Board (protocol number KEMRI/RES/7/3/1) with the Protocol reviewed by the KEMRI animal care and use committee (ACUC).

Generation of metal tolerant An. gambiae s.s. strain

Anopheles gambiae s.s. third-instar larvae were selected for heavy metal tolerance tests through f1-f3 generations, in empirically determined, maximum acceptable toxicant concentrations (MATC) of cadmium, copper or lead. Eggs (1500 per replicate) and subsequent emergent immature stages (larvae and pupae) were exposed to the metal solutions, (separately for each metal) and in three replicates. The larvae were normally propagated in 1,500 mL of respective metal solutions in polypropylene cylindrical pans with a radius and height of 10.5 and 24.1 cm, respectively. The MATC were 0.36, 1.86 or 4.39 μg/L for cadmium, copper and lead, respectively. Tolerance to cadmium, copper or lead in the first and third generations was monitored through LC50 acute toxicity testing (Chareonviriyaphap et al., 2002). Toxicity range tests (24 h) of cadmium, copper or lead were conducted on the first and third generations using third-instar An. gambiae s.s. larvae. After determining the lower and upper toxicity ranges of each metal, 24 h acute toxicity tests were conducted. Lower and upper ranges were concentrations that caused more than 10 % or less than 96 % mortality, respectively. Three replicates (n = 25 larvae per replicate) were exposed to five lead, cadmium or copper concentrations within the established toxicity response ranges (Finney, 1971) in 400 mL of distilled water in the polypropylene cylindrical pans.

Larval mortalities were evaluated 24 h post exposure and LC50 determined by Probit Analysis. The larvae were not fed during the exposure period. The generation of LC50 values, and respective slopes for each metal selected strain, are presented in Table 1. A control colony was reared simultaneously in a separate room and handled in the same manner through all manipulations, but was not exposed to heavy metals. Emergent adult survivors from each treatment replicate and generation were propagated separately. There were a total of 12 colonies used for each of three generations: nine heavy metal tolerant treatment strains and three control strains.

Table 1
Concentrations (μg/mL) that impose 50% mortality (LC50) of third instar An. gambiae s.s. larvae in naïve population, and following three successive generational exposures to heavy metals

All the concentrations were validated by direct quantitative determination of cadmium, copper or lead separately in each exposure concentration and replicate using Buck Scientific 210VGP flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (BuckScientific, East Norwalk, CT, U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quality control was achieved using certified reference sediment material for cadmium, copper and lead (IAEA 433) from the International Atomic Energy Agency (Wyse et al., 2004).

Effect of heavy metal selection on immature An. gambiae s.s. survivorship

Egg hatchability

Samples of eggs (n = 1500) were collected separately from the third generation of selection for each of the strains (i.e. three heavy metals and one control * three replicates of each). Each sample of eggs was placed in 1,500 mL chlorine-free distilled water and the proportions of eggs that hatched were counted under a dissecting microscope (Leica WILD M3Z) 48 h post-exposure.

Survival rate of larvae to ecolsion

All emergent larvae were normally reared in separate 1,500 mL containers, as described above (i.e. for each of the three heavy metals and one control* three replicates of each). The initial larvae density for each treatment and replicate was therefore determined by the number of eggs that had hatched in each sample of eggs. Larvae pupating each day were noted and the pupae were placed into jars within emergence cages, separated by day, treatment and replicate.

The proportion of pupae that survived to produce adults, and the ratio of male: female adults

The numbers and sexes of adults emerging from each jar were recorded daily until the last adult emerged, constituting12 readings of emergence rates (i.e. three heavy metal solutions plus one control * three replicates of each).

Effect of heavy metal selections on An. gambiae s.s. adult survivorship

A sample of emergent adults from each replicate was selected for adult life studies (Reisen & Mahmood, 1980). After males and females had been together in a cage long enough for mating to have occurred, samples of 40 males and 40 females (<12 h old) from the control and each of the metal-selected strains were placed in separate 4 L plastic containers in three replicates. Each sample of mosquitoes was supplied with cotton wool soaked in 10% sucrose and anaesthetized mice (female only) were provided daily as a blood-meal source. For oviposition, water in a plastic cup lined with filter paper (9 cm radius) was provided. Egg cups and sucrose cotton wool were changed daily. The eggs collected represented a contribution from 40 females. Mortality of both sexes was recorded daily until the last mosquito died. The three replicates of each metal and control treatment were reared separately throughout post-selection processes and the replicates had separate growing pans/cages for each line in all assessments.

Data Analysis

Mortality rates for testing the toxicity of each metal were corrected by Abbott’s formula (Busvine, 1971) and then transformed to Probits (Finney, 1971) for linear regression analysis and the determination of 50 % lethal concentrations (LC50); Probit analysis software was used (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Cincinnati, OH, U.S.A., Probit Program Version 1.5).

Horizontal life table analytical methods were applied to data for both immature and adult stages of various selection categories, since the cohorts were from distinct lines and were followed consistently through time from egg to adult (Reisen & Mahmood 1980).

Age–specific survivorship of adults (lx) was determined as


where yx = the number of males or females alive on each day x and yo is the original number in the sample, so that the proportion is 1 on day 0.

The age-specific life expectancy (ex) was computed as





and, w = the day the last individual died (i.e. e1 = the adult life expectancy at emergence in days).

In order to transmit Plasmodium falciparum, P. malariae or P. vivax, the anopheline vector must survive for ~ 8, 14 and 7 days, respectively, at temperatures and humidities similar to those applied in this study (Siddons, 1944). Assuming the infective meal is taken during the mosquito’s second and third nights of adult life, the potential infective proportion of the population would consist of females not less than 10 days of age. Mean life expectancy at 10 days (e10) was, therefore, computed for the female control and metal-selected strains. The net reproductive rate per cohort, or the total number of living females produced per female (Ro), was established as


where a = the mean proportion of females that survived from egg through adult emergence, and


where Ex is the mean number of larvae (i.e. hatched eggs) produced per female per age interval x, and p is the proportion of the offspring that were female.

In this study, the mean value of ‘a’ (proportions of females surviving to adult) for the control, cadmium-, copper- and lead- tolerant strains was 0.85, 0.16, 0.18 and 0.11, respectively, based on magnitude of female emergence and the observed sex ratio, and ‘p’ (proportion of offspring that were female) was 0.51, 0.49, 0.51, and 0.49, respectively. The p values are based on the observed sex ratio of the emerging adults from the non-selected control strain and metal-selected strains.

The age of mean cohort reproduction in days (To) was established as


starting at x =1, the day of adult emergence.

The instantaneous rate of increase in females per female (rm), was calculated using the Dobzhansky et al. (1964) modification of the original Euler-Lotka equation by the Newton Raphason iteration method where


e is the base of natural logarithm and D is the duration in days from oviposition in the present generation to first oviposition in the offspring generation. D was considered to be the observed mean median emergence time for females plus the duration of the nulliparous period for that cohort. For non-selected control, cadmium-, copper- and lead-selected strains, D (in days) ranges were 14.66 – 17.33, 16.33 – 17.23, 16.56 – 19.07 and 14.23 –14.85 days, respectively.

The mean generation time in days (G) was computed as


Since this value included D in the calculation, G was a realistic estimate of the time from mean oviposition in the present generation to mean oviposition of the offspring generation.

The instantaneous birth rate (b) was calculated as


and the instantaneous death rate (d) as



1/β=x=1wLxerm(x+1)( Birch, 1948)

Population doubling time in days (Td) was calculated as

Td=ln(2)r( Elkinton, 1993)

The effects of the metal selection on egg viability/hatchability, larval and pupal mortalities, and male and female emergence were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the three replicate data sets, with the control and each of the metal treatments as factors. Means that were significantly different were identified using Tukey HSD post-hoc analysis. Similarly, the effects of heavy metal selection on the sex ratios, fecundities, male and female mean life expectancies from emergence (e1), net reproductive rates, mean life expectancies at 10 days (e10), (Ro) mean cohort reproduction ages (To), instantaneous rates of increases (rm), mean generation times (G), instantaneous birth rates (b), death rates (d), population doubling times (Td), rm/b and b/d among the treatments were also evaluated by one-way ANOVA on respective triplicate data sets, with the control, and each of the metal treatments as factors. Means that were significantly different were identified using Tukey HSD post-hoc analysis. ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software (SPSS Corporation, Chicago, IL, U.S.A., Statistical Package version 11.5).


Changes in tolerance with metal-selection

Cadmium was found to be the most toxic, followed by copper. The LC50 values of copper or lead selection generally increased with generation selection, while that for cadmium selection reduced for unknown reasons (Table 1). Overall, there was approximately a 1.36, 2.01 or 1.05 -fold change in the LC50 values following cadmium, copper or lead selection. Computed slopes of regression lines for each generation, an indicator or resistance vs tolerance development, indicate that the values for β did not vary significantly.

Effects of metal-selection on An. gambiae s.s. immature survivorship, adult emergence and fecundity

Effects of metal selections on various immature developmental attributes are presented in Table 2. The mean number of eggs that hatched was significantly higher in the controls (98.47 %) than in metal-selected strains (63.80 –66.58%) (F(3,11)= 90.11, P < 0.001). Similarly, the mean number of larvae that died was similar among the metals selected strains (68.86 – 79.00 %), and significantly higher than in control (10.13%) (F (3,11) = 121.23, P < 0.001). Larval survivors were significantly higher in the controls (89.87%) than in metal-selected strains except in lead-selected strain, which had significantly less survivors (21.00%) (F (3, 11) = 583.86, P < 0.001). Pupal survivorship pattern was similar to that of the larvae with that exposed to cadmium (19.78%) being significantly higher than that to lead (14.12%) (F (3, 11) = 5.23, P < 0. 05).

Table 2
Mean (± SE) and percentage developmental attributes of metal-selected and non-selected control An. gambiae s.s. strains

Significantly more males (87.78%) (F (3,11)= 719.26, P < 0.001) and females (84.67%)(F (3,11)= 758.91, P < 0.001) also emerged from control than from any of the metal selected strains (11.24 – 18.00 %). The male: female sex ratios were also similar (F(3, 11) = 3.09, P >0.05) among the strains. Fecundity (i.e. the mean number of eggs per female per group) was significantly higher (F(3,11)= 52.24, P < 0.001) in control than metal-selected strains by 2.4, 1.7 and 2.1-fold in cadmium-, copper- and lead-selected strains, respectively. Overall, general survivorship was significantly higher in control than in metal selected populations.

Effect of metal selection on An. gambiae s.s. adult survivorship and fitness

The effects of metal tolerance on the biological fitness of An. gambiae s.s. adults are presented in Table 3. The copper-selected strain had lower mean life expectancy (e1) than cadmium or lead-selected strains. Female life expectancies at 10 days (e10) were similar (F(3,11= 3.45, P > 0.05) between all treatments. Net reproductive rates (Ro) were significantly higher (F(3,11)= 8.17, P < 0.01) in controls by 6-, 20- and 21-fold than in the cadmium-, copper- and lead-selected strains, respectively. Metal-selected strains had significantly lower natural rates of increase (rm) (F(3,11)= 5.53, P <0.05) but longer population doubling times (Td) (F(3,11)= 7.81, P <0.01) than the respective control strains. Additionally, instantaneous birth rates (b) were significantly lower (F(3,11)= 5.72, P<0.05) in copper- or lead-selected strains than in the respective control strains. Rm/b (F(3, 11) = 12.61, P <0.01) and b/d ratios (F(3,11)= 8.28, P <0.01) were significantly higher in control than in metal selected strains.

Table 3
Adult life table characteristics of control and heavy metal selected An. gambiae s.s. strains


This study demonstrates the potential of An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes to withstand chronic exposure to heavy metals in the range occurring in metal-polluted natural habitats (Mireji et al., 2008). Our findings are in harmony with recent reports (Awolola et al., 2007; Djouaka et al., 2007) that indicate the inherent capacity of this vector to adapt genetically to chemically altered habitats encountered in urban environments. This phenomenon may account for recent evidence of rapid increases in population sizes of some disease vectors in urban cities (reviewed by Robert et al., 2003). The present results indicate 23-fold lower tolerance to the metals within our colony relative to the conditions in nature (Mireji et al., 2008), which may be attributed to the relatively shorter selection period (three generations) compared to the natural populations in polluted habitats. The present study also indicates that tolerance occurs at significant fitness costs to the species, which is reflected in reduced survivorship and fecundity, as previously suggested (Orr, 1998; Reed et al., 2003). How this would affect the ecological performance of the mosquito remains unknown and detailed observations of affected field populations over a longer time scale may be necessary to determine the actual ecological fitness status in nature. In our previous study in polluted habitats (Mireji et al., 2008), we found An. gambiae s.s. thriving in significantly higher concentrations of heavy metals than used in the present study, indicating that following survival under initial exposures, intensive selection must have occurred and that the acquired fitness was passed over to subsequent generations.

There are other potential implications of our results for the ecological performance of mosquitoes. First, because of the relatively high net reproductive rate (>1) of mosquitoes, metal-selected strains may be highly successful at colonizing habitats (Elkinton, 1993), although depressed egg viability and reduced fecundity of the adult population might lead to substantially reduced population sizes in successive generations. Anopheles gambiae s.s. is known to proliferate in different types of habitat in different seasons (Mbogo et al., 1995), some of which have been found recently to be contaminated with heavy metals (Mireji et al., 2008). It may thus be anticipated that the dominance of metal-selected versus naïve populations would alternate seasonally in different habitats, depending on levels of heavy metals. Development of effective molecular markers for the two types of populations; complementary field and controlled laboratory studies may help shed some light on these questions.

The differences in the patterns of tolerance to different metal selections may also suggest different underlying biological regulatory processes for each metal, including their uptake (Buchwalter & Luom, 2005). The metal uptake could have been through larval permeable body surfaces (Rainbow, 2007), the gut (Wang, 2002) or both. Additionally, significant variation between the effects of the metals on survivorship and fecundity indicate major differences in their effective toxicities to mosquitoes (Hare, 1992); the rate of detoxification of the respective metals could be an important determinant (Rainbow, 2002; Marsden & Rainbow, 2004). The variation may also be due to differences in ‘carry over’ or transmission of some of the metal molecules from mother to offspring and/or other indirect maternal effects. Detailed comparative studies on molecular and physiological processes associated with tolerance and fitness, and particularly those that underlie sequestration of the metals and their bio-availability and bio-magnifications, are needed to elucidate reasons for these differences.

In conclusion, although An. gambiae s.s. displays the potential to develop tolerance to increasing levels of heavy metal, it occurs at a significant biological cost, which can adversely affect the mosquito’s ecological performance and fitness. Our study provides a starting point for further detailed complementary field and controlled laboratory studies to shed some light on the long-term ecological implications of our findings.


We thank Mr. Salim Mwatsahu of the Department of Chemistry, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya, for his technical assistance in Atomic absorption spectroscopy analysis of the samples and Ms. Milkah Gitau (ICIPE, Nairobi) for her technical assistance with mosquito rearing. This study was funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant no. NIH ICIDR U19 A145511 and NIH Fogarty ABC Grant no. D43 TWO1142.


  • Afrane YA, Klinkenberg E, Drechsel P, Owusu-Daaku K, Garms R, Kruppa T. Does irrigated urban agriculture influence the transmission of malaria in the city of Kumasi, Ghana? Acta Trop. 2004;89:125–134. [PubMed]
  • Agnew P, Berticat C, Bedhomme S, Sidobre C, Michalakis Y. Parasitism increases and decreases the costs of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Evolution. 2004;58:579–586. [PubMed]
  • Awolola TS, Oduola AO, Obansa JB, Chukwurar NJ, Unyimadu JP. Anopheles gambiae s.s. breeding in polluted water bodies in urban Lagos, southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases. 2007;44:241–244. [PubMed]
  • Birch LC. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1948;17:15–26.
  • Brown AWA, Pal R. The 2nd WHO Monograph Ser 38. World Health Organization; 1971. Insecticide Resistance in Arthropods.
  • Buchwalter DB, Luoma S. Differences in Dissolved Cadmium and Zinc Uptake among Stream Insects: Mechanistic Explanations. Environmental Science and Technology. 2005;39:498–504. [PubMed]
  • Busvine JR. A Critical Review of the Techniques for the Testing Insecticides. Farnham Royal, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureux; London: 1971.
  • Chareonviriyaphap T, Rongnoparut P, Juntarumporn P. Selection for pyrethroid resistance in a colony of Anopheles minimus species A, a malaria vector in Thailand. Journal of Vector Ecology. 2002;27:222–229. [PubMed]
  • Chinery WA. Effects of ecological changes on the malaria vectors Anopheles funestus and Anopheles gambiae complex of mosquitoes in Accra, Ghana. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1984;87:75–81. [PubMed]
  • Chinery WA. Impact of rapid urbanization on mosquitoes and their disease transmission potential in Accra and Tema, Ghana. African Journal of Medical Science. 1995;24:179–188. [PubMed]
  • Coene J. Malaria in urban and rural Kinshasa, The entomological input. Medical Veterinary Entomology. 1993;7:127–137. [PubMed]
  • Djouaka RF, Bakare AA, Bankole HS, Doannio JM, Coulibaly ON, Kossou H, Tamo M, Basene HI, Popoola OK, Akogbeto MC. Does the spillage of petroleum products in Anopheles breeding sites have an impact on the pyrethroid resistance? Malaria Journal. 2007;6:159. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dobzhansky T, Lewontin RC, Pallovsky O. The capacity for increase in chromosomally polymorphic and monomophic populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Heredity. 1964;19:597–614. [PubMed]
  • Elkinton JS. An African Perspective. ICIPE Science Press; Nairobi: 1993. Insect Population Ecology; pp. 33–58.
  • Finney DJ. Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press; London: 1971.
  • Ford HR, Green E. Laboratory rearing of Anopheles albimanus. Mosquito News. 1972;32:509–513.
  • Hare L. Aquatic insects and trace metals; Bio-availability, bio-accumulation and toxicity. Critical Review of Toxicology. 1992;22:327–369. [PubMed]
  • Levin BR, Perrot V, Walker N. Compensatory mutations, antibiotic resistance and the population genetics of adaptive evolution in bacteria. Genetics. 2000;154:985–997. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Marsden ID, Rainbow PS. Does the accumulation of trace metals in crustaceans affect their ecology — the amphipod example? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2004;300:343–371.
  • Matthys B, N’Goran EK, Kone M, Koudou BG, Vounatsou P, Cisse G, Tschannen AB, Tanner M, Utzinger J. Urban agricultural land use and characterization of mosquito larval habitats in a medium-sized town of Cote d’Ivoire. Journal of Vector Ecology. 2006;31:319–333. [PubMed]
  • Mbogo CM, Snow RW, Khamala CP, Kabiru EW, Ouma JH, Githure JI, Marsh K, Beier JC. Relationships between of Plasmodium falciparum transmission by vector populations and the incidence of severe disease at nine sites on the Kenyan coast. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1995;52:201–206. [PubMed]
  • Mireji PO, Keating J, Hassanali A, Mbogo CM, Nyambaka H, Kahindi S, Beier JC. Heavy metals in mosquito larval habitats in urban Kisumu and Malindi, Kenya, and their impact. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2008;70:147–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Orr HA. The population genetics of adaptation, the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution. 1998;52:935–949.
  • Rainbow PS. Trace metal concentrations in aquatic invertebrates: why and so what? Environmental Pollution. 2002;120:497–507. [PubMed]
  • Rainbow PS. Trace metal bioaccumulation: models, metabolic availability and toxicity. Environment International. 2007;33:576–582. [PubMed]
  • Reed DH, Lowe EH, Briscoe DA, Frankham R. Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment; Effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage. Evolution. 2003;57:1822–1828. [PubMed]
  • Reisen WK, Mahmood F. Horizontal life table characteristics of the malaria vectors Anopheles culifacies and Anopheles stephensi (Diptera, Culicidae) Journal of Medical Entomology. 1980;17:211–217.
  • Robert V, Awono-Ambene HP, Thioulouse J. Ecology of larval mosquitoes, with special reference to Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culcidae) in market-garden wells in urban Dakar, Senegal. Journal of Medical Entomology. 2005;35:948–955. [PubMed]
  • Robert V, Macintyre K, Keating J, Trape JF, Duchemin JB, Warren M, Beier JC. Malaria transmission in urban sub-Saharan Africa. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2003;68:169–76. [PubMed]
  • Siddons LB. Observation of the influence of atmospheric temperature and humidity on the infectivity of Anopheles culicifacies Giles. Journal of Malaria Institute of India. 1944;3:363–84.
  • Trape JF, Zoulani A. Malaria and urbanization in central Africa, the example of Brazzaville. Part II, Results of entomological surveys and epidemiological analysis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1987;81:10–18. [PubMed]
  • Wang WX. Interactions of trace metals and different marine food chains. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2002;243:295–309.
  • Wyse EJ, Azemard S, de Mora SJ. Report on the worldwide intercomparison exercise for the determination of trace elements and methyl-mercury in marine sediment IAEA-462–433. IAEA/AL/147, IAEA/MEL/75, IAEA; 2004. p. 113.
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...