• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Nat Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 5, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
Published online Jan 6, 2008. doi:  10.1038/nm1682
PMCID: PMC2916740
NIHMSID: NIHMS214220

Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury

Abstract

Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) in humans1,2 and experimental animals36 are often associated with varying degrees of spontaneous functional recovery during the first months after injury. Such recovery is widely attributed to axons spared from injury that descend from the brain and bypass incomplete lesions, but its mechanisms are uncertain. To investigate the neural basis of spontaneous recovery, we used kinematic, physiological and anatomical analyses to evaluate mice with various combinations of spatially and temporally separated lateral hemisections with or without the excitotoxic ablation of intrinsic spinal cord neurons. We show that propriospinal relay connections that bypass one or more injury sites are able to mediate spontaneous functional recovery and supraspinal control of stepping, even when there has been essentially total and irreversible interruption of long descending supraspinal pathways in mice. Our findings show that pronounced functional recovery can occur after severe SCI without the maintenance or regeneration of direct projections from the brain past the lesion and can be mediated by the reorganization of descending and propriospinal connections4,79. Targeting interventions toward augmenting the remodeling of relay connections may provide new therapeutic strategies to bypass lesions and restore function after SCI and in other conditions such as stroke and multiple sclerosis.

Although spontaneous functional recovery after SCI is widely attributed to spared axons that descend from the brain past incomplete lesions, evidence has been presented periodically over the past 75 or more years suggesting that propriospinal connections may also make substantial contributions1014. The degree to which propriospinal connections might mediate functional recovery after SCI has important implications for strategies to facilitate repair after SCI, but has thus far remained undetermined. In this study, we conducted a detailed kinematic, physiological and anatomical analysis of the basis for spontaneous recovery of hindlimb stepping after SCI in mice, using various combinations of SCI alone or SCI together with excitotoxic ablation of intrinsic spinal cord neurons.

We first examined adult mice that received a single lateral (left) hemisection at thoracic segment 12 (T12; Fig. 1a) to test the effect of interrupting descending inputs to locomotor circuits at lumbar segments L1–L2 (ref. 15) on one side (Figs. (Figs.11 and and2).2). Histological evaluations after these experiments consistently showed lesion-induced scarring through the entire ipsilateral dorsal-ventral extent of the spinal cord from the lateral margin to the midline (Supplementary Fig. 1 online), and completeness of the lesions was evaluated anatomically and functionally as described below. During the first week after this SCI, mice entirely lost the ability to step with (Fig. 1b,d,e and Supplementary Fig. 2 online) or recruit extensor (vastus lateralis) and flexor (tibialis anterior) muscles in the ipsilateral hindlimb (Fig. 1f,g), but retained the ability to step with the contralateral hindlimb (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Video 1 online). Bowel function was not detectably altered, and bladder function did not require assistance (that is, manual bladder expression) by the end of the first week after the unilateral hemisection (data not shown). Step-like movements began to reappear on the ipsilateral side by 10–14 d after injury, but gait analysis during treadmill locomotion at 14 d showed that mice were not able to take plantar steps with the ipsilateral hindlimb (Fig. 1d), had a significantly reduced stance duration (Supplementary Fig. 2a; within-subjects ANOVA, P < 0.001) and dragged the hindpaw during swing (Supplementary Fig. 2b and Supplementary Video 1). At 14 d after SCI, the tibialis anterior was strongly facilitated (Fig. 1g; ANOVA, P < 0.001) and coactivated (Fig. 1h) with the otherwise weakly active vastus lateralis (Fig. 1g; ANOVA, P < 0.001). From 2 to 7 weeks after injury, mice progressively recovered plantar stepping ability as evidenced by a lengthening in stance duration (Supplementary Fig. 2a) that correlated with an increase in vastus lateralis activity (Fig. 1f,g) and a decrease in paw-dragging duration (Supplementary Fig. 2b) associated with reduced (Fig. 1g) and coordinated (Fig. 1h) recruitment of flexor muscles (Supplementary Video 1).

Figure 1
Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping after a lateral hemisection at T12. (a) Schematic of left hemisection at T12 (black). (b) Reflective markers overlying bony landmarks were video recorded (100 Hz). The limb axis from iliac crest to toe (dashed ...
Figure 2
Long-term loss of supraspinal but not propriospinal connections after a T12 lateral hemisection or after T12 (left) and delayed T7 (right) lateral hemisections. (a) Schematic of the areas evaluated in the brainstem and spinal cord after unilateral injection ...

To test the completeness of the lateral hemisection and to determine which of the descending anatomical pathways that regulate stepping either retained or regained connection with the ipsilateral locomotor circuits at L1–L2, we conducted quantitative retrograde tract-tracing (Fig. 2a–e). Mice injected with tracer immediately after SCI (acute group) and examined 1 week later showed pronounced and significant (P < 0.001) reductions in neuronal labeling of 75–100% in major brainstem motor centers (Fig. 2b,e) and in the spinal cord at T8–T10 (Fig. 2d,e), whereas neuronal labeling in the contralateral spinal cord caudal to the injury (L1–L2) was not significantly reduced (Fig. 2c,e) compared to uninjured mice. Mice injected with tracer 10 weeks after SCI (chronic group) showed no significant differences in neuronal labeling in the brainstem compared to mice injected with tracer immediately after SCI (Fig. 2e). However, propriospinal neuronal labeling in T8–T10 was significantly increased (ANOVA, P < 0.01) in mice injected at 10 weeks relative to mice injected immediately after SCI, with a return to about 40% of the amount seen in uninjured mice (Fig. 2d,e). To determine the time course of this increase, we examined additional mice injected with tracer at intermediate times and found that propriospinal neuronal labeling in T8–T10 increased gradually in mice injected at 2 and 4 weeks after unilateral hemisection SCI (Fig. 2e). Neuronal labeling in the contralateral spinal cord caudal to the injury at L1–L2 remained unaltered under the different experimental conditions (Fig. 2e).

To further test the completeness of the lateral hemisection at T12, we placed a second lateral hemisection 10 weeks after the first at the same level (T12) but on the contralateral side (Fig. 1c) in mice that had recovered from the first lesion. After this second lesion, mice showed complete paralysis of both hind limbs with no signs of recovery of locomotor function over 4 weeks (n = 4; Fig. 1e, Supplementary Fig. 2a,b and Supplementary Video 2), demonstrating that recovery after the first hemisection was due to supraspinal information passing the injury site on the contralateral side, rather than to the sparing of fibers ipsilateral to the hemisection or to autonomous activity of lumbosacral locomotor circuits.

Together, these findings showed that substantial recovery of hindlimb stepping with virtually normal coordinated recruitment between flexors and extensors had occurred spontaneously after an essentially complete lateral hemisection in which there was neither sparing nor regeneration of the original long-tract descending axons from the brain through the lesion to the ipsilateral locomotor circuits. This gradual restoration of kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) features of gait was accompanied by progressive anatomical changes in retrograde labeling compatible with either the gradual sprouting or recovery of spared intraspinal fibers or the gradual establishment of de novo relay propriospinal circuits connecting rostral T8–T10 neurons bilaterally to the caudal L1–L2 locomotor centers ipsilateral to the hemisection (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c,g online).

We next sought to identify essential components of the pathways mediating recovery. We examined mice that had received two spatially separated hemisections at T12 and T7 on opposite sides of the spinal cord to test the effect of transecting descending inputs from the brain to the locomotor circuits at L1–L2 on both sides while leaving an intervening gap of contiguous intrinsic spinal cord circuits (Figs. (Figs.2f2f and and3a).3a). These two lesions were made either simultaneously or temporally separated by 10 weeks to allow time for recovery to plateau after the first hemisection, as described above. When the two lesions were placed simultaneously, mice showed complete bilateral hindlimb paralysis (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 4a online), the tibialis anterior was quiescent on both sides (Fig. 3c) and recovery over the 4 weeks postlesion was limited to small hindlimb movements on the T7 side (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 4a and Supplementary Video 3a online). We next examined the effects of first placing a hemisection at T12 and allowing the mice to recover ipsilateral stepping and then placing a second hemisection at T7 on the contralateral side 10 weeks after the T12 lesion (Figs. (Figs.2f2f and and3a).3a). After this delayed second hemisection at T7, mice initially lost stepping ability completely on the T7 side and partially on the T12 side (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 4b and Supplementary Video 3b). After 3 d, the tibialis anterior muscle on the originally lesioned T12 side showed large, rhythmic bursts of EMG activity, whereas the tibialis anterior muscle on the newly lesioned T7 side was quiescent (Fig. 3c,d). Stepping ability returned gradually, and by 4 weeks after the delayed T7 hemisection, the mice had spontaneously recovered substantial and significant locomotor ability with voluntary treadmill and over-ground plantar stepping on both the T7 and the T12 sides (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 4b and Supplementary Video 3b). Bowel function was not detectably altered (data not shown). Manual bladder expression was required for all mice with delayed bilateral hemisections over the entire survival period, although about one-third of these mice showed some partial spontaneous bladder emptying (data not shown). We also examined the effects of a delayed complete spinal cord transection at T7 10 weeks after a hemisection at T12 (Fig. 3a). In these mice, there were no EMG bursts in the tibialis anterior (Fig. 3c,d), no hindlimb movements and no signs of recovery during the 4 weeks postlesion (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 4c and Supplementary Video 3c). Thus, the motor pool recruitment observed after the delayed T7 hemisection resulted from supraspinal drive being transferred past the lesion sites to the lumbosacral locomotor circuits, as opposed to autonomous, spinally generated muscle activity16.

Figure 3
Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping after delayed but not simultaneous T12 (left) and T7 (right) lateral hemisections. (a) Schematic of different combinations of simultaneous or delayed (10 weeks) SCIs. (b) Bar graphs showing the average maximum ...

To determine whether descending anatomical pathways had remained intact or had regenerated after hemisections at T12 and T7, we injected retrograde tract-tracer bilaterally into the locomotor circuits at L1–L2 either immediately after simultaneous bilateral hemisections at T12 and T7 or 4 weeks after the delayed second hemisection at T7 (Fig. 2f). In comparison to uninjured mice, these mice all showed pronounced and significant (P < 0.001) reductions in neuronal labeling of 81–100% in brainstem motor centers, and there were no significant differences between mice receiving simultaneous or delayed double hemisections (Fig. 2g), indicating that the differences in locomotor behavior observed in these two groups of mice were not due to differences in the number of spared or regenerating supraspinal projections past the lesions. Notably, many propriospinal neurons at T8–T10 were retrogradely labeled in a bilateral fashion by bilateral tracer injections at L1–L2 after either simultaneous or delayed lesions, and at 4 weeks after the delayed second hemisection at T7, the proportion of neurons showing this effect was about 40% of that in uninjured controls (Fig. 2g).

Together, these findings indicate that substantial recovery of bilateral hindlimb stepping function occurred after two temporally separated unilateral hemisections (at T12 and T7) that created an essentially complete bilateral transection of all direct projections from the brain to the locomotor circuits at L1–L2 but left an intervening bridge of intrinsic spinal cord circuitry (Supplementary Fig. 3c–e). The observation that recovery occurred when the lesions were placed at different times, but not after simultaneous lesions, suggested that recovery might be due to time-dependent changes such as reorganization of interactions between descending supraspinal connections and intrinsic spinal cord circuits able to relay information past the lesions.

To test further the role of thoracic propriospinal neurons above the lesion in mediating the functional recovery observed after a T12 hemisection (left), or after two temporally separated unilateral hemisections at T12 (left) and T7 (right), we ablated these neurons by infusing the axon-sparing excitotoxin N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA)17 into the gray matter at T8 and T10 on the side of the T12 lesion (left) and at T9 on the side of the T7 lesion (right). These NMDA infusions ablated the majority of ipsilateral and contralateral neurons at the level of each injection (Fig. 4a). There was no detectable effect on the major myelinated long descending fiber tracts in the lateral portions of the lateral column, but, as expected, some degeneration and demyelination was observed among medial propriospinal fiber tracts after ablation of local propriospinal neurons (Fig. 4b). In otherwise uninjured mice, these NMDA infusions had only minor effects on hindlimb kinematics during stepping (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. 5a and Supplementary Video 4a online), in agreement with findings by others18.

Figure 4
Excitotoxic ablation of T8–T10 neurons abolishes the recovered control of stepping after a T12 lateral hemisection and after a T12 lateral hemisection followed by a delayed T7 lateral hemisection. (a,b) Survey and detail images of neighboring ...

In mice with a unilateral hemisection at T12 that had recovered stepping function after 10 weeks, infusions of NMDA completely abolished the spontaneously recovered stepping on the ipsilateral side and caused pronounced hyperextension and limb dragging with loss of trunk control, but these infusions did not significantly alter stepping on the side contralateral to the T12 hemisection (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. 5b and Supplementary Video 4b). In mice with two temporally separated unilateral hemisections at T12 (left) and T7 (right) that had recovered bilateral stepping function 4 weeks after the second hemisection at T7, infusions of NMDA completely abolished the spontaneously recovered stepping on both sides and caused pronounced hyperextension and dragging of both hindlimbs (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. 5c and Supplementary Video 4c). These findings showed that local thoracic propriospinal neurons were essential for the spontaneous recovery of bilateral stepping observed after a single hemisection or after two temporally and spatially separated hemisections, and any potentially spared long descending supraspinal fibers projecting past the lesion sites were not, on their own, sufficient to mediate supraspinal control of stepping (Supplementary Fig. 3f,h,i).

After complete spinal cord transection in both animals and humans, the intrinsic spinal cord circuitry is, with locomotor training, pharmacological administration or both, able to execute both standing and body weight–supported treadmill stepping in the complete absence of descending connections from the brain19,20. Recent studies have found substantial anatomical and physiological reorganization of descending and propriospinal circuits after partial descending-tract lesions4,79. In vitro organ preparations have revealed polysynaptic propriospinal circuits that are present at birth in mice and contribute to bulbospinal activation of locomotor networks in the lumbosacral spinal cord21. Our findings are compatible with, and substantially extend, these observations by showing that after severe SCI, full weight-bearing locomotion can be initiated voluntarily and sustained in the essential absence of inputs that pass directly from the brain to the lumbosacral locomotor circuits and can be mediated by de novo relay propriospinal circuits that transmit neural information past the lesion sites. Thus, after SCI, the time-dependent reorganization and plasticity of long descending and propriospinal connections are sufficient to reestablish supraspinal control of lumbosacral circuits indirectly via relay connections that mediate substantial functional recovery.

The findings of this study have important implications for developing strategies to improve function after SCI (ref. 22). Manipulations to promote axon regeneration and increase the sprouting and plasticity of residual connections are steadily improving2326 but little is known about which neural systems would be most effective to target with such interventions27. Our findings show that the precise restoration of point-to-point connections made by long-tract descending axons from the brain to the lumbosacral locomotor circuits is not required to achieve meaningful functional recovery. Instead, the reorganization of interactions between descending inputs and intrinsic spinal cord circuits that relay information past lesion sites is sufficient to achieve supraspinal control of lumbosacral circuits and recovery of function after severe SCI. Targeting interventions to augment the remodeling of relay connections should provide new, and potentially more easily achievable, therapeutic strategies to bypass lesions and restore function after SCI and in other debilitating conditions such as stroke and multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

Mice

Wild-type C57BL/6 female mice were derived from an in-house breeding colony. We housed the mice in a 12-h light-dark cycle in a specific pathogen–free facility with controlled temperature and humidity, and we allowed them free access to food and water. We conducted experiments according to protocols approved by the Chancellor’s Animal Research Committee of the Office for Protection of Research Subjects at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Surgical procedures

We performed all surgical procedures on mice that were under full general anesthesia with isoflurane in oxygen-enriched air. We conducted basic surgical procedures and postoperative care for SCI subjects as described previously28. All descriptions of segmental levels refer to spinal cord levels. To selectively kill spinal cord neurons, we stereotaxically injected the excitotoxic glutamate agonist NMDA (Sigma) into the spinal cord gray matter at T8 and T10 on the side of the T12 lesion (left), and at T9 on the side of the T7 lesion (right), at a volume of 0.3 μl of 1 mM NMDA per site17,28. We conducted retrograde tract-tracing by injecting Dextran–Alexa 568 (3000 kDa; 2% w/v in sterile water) unilaterally or bilaterally into L1–L2 with glass micropipettes (100-μm tip) at 1 μl per site over 10 min with a Harvard microinfusion pump. We perfused the mice 1 week later and counted retrogradely labeled neurons as described17,28.

Treadmill locomotion

We assessed hindlimb stepping function during continuous quadrupedal treadmill locomotion. We tested mice 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 48 d after SCI unless otherwise specified. The treadmill belt speed was set at 10.3 cm/s for all testing of T12-hemisected mice. We tested mice that had undergone double hemisection or NMDA infusion at 7.8 cm/s because they could not step at faster treadmill speeds.

Kinematics

Three-dimensional video recordings (100 Hz) were made with four cameras (Basler Vision Technologies) oriented at 45° and 135° with respect to the direction of the locomotion (that is, the mouse’s sagittal plane) on both sides. We attached reflective markers bilaterally to the shaved skin overlying specific bony landmarks (Fig. 1b). We used SIMI motion-capture software (SIMI Reality Motion Systems) to obtain three-dimensional coordinates of the markers. We modeled the body as an interconnected chain of rigid segments (Fig. 1b), and we generated the joint angles accordingly. Of note, the limb axis was the segment connecting the iliac crest to the metatarsal joint (toe). We extracted 10–15 consistent step cycles from a continuous sequence of stepping for each animal. We computed the amplitudes of joint and limb-axis motion as well as classic gait parameters29.

Electromyograph recordings

Bipolar intramuscular EMG wires (AS631-2, Coonerwires) were implanted chronically into the vastus lateralis or tibialis anterior muscles bilaterally as described previously29. We routed the wires subcutaneously through the back to a small headplug (Fig. 1b; Omnetics) to which a light cable was attached during the recordings (Supplementary Fig. 2). We recorded (2,000 Hz), amplified and filtered (10–1,000 Hz band-pass) the EMG signals and computed the duration and mean amplitude of identified EMG bursts29. We generated probability density distributions of EMG amplitudes normalized to pre-lesion values of the antagonist tibialis anterior (flexor) and vastus lateralis (extensor) muscles during a sequence of 10 s of continuous treadmill stepping as described elsewhere30.

Histological and morphometric procedures

After the final experiment, we processed the mice for histological evaluation as described28. We either stained the tissue sections with cresyl violet or evaluated them for the presence of retrograde tracer. We performed cell counts of retrogradely labeled neurons on tissue sections (coded so that the identity of the experimental group was hidden) with image analysis software (StereoInvestigator or NeuroLucida, MicroBrightField) operating a computer-driven microscope regulated in the x, y and z axes (Zeiss). We counted all retrogradely labeled neurons per section in a series of at least four evenly spaced sections through the entire region of each area analyzed and expressed the values as total number counted per region per mouse.

Statistics

We performed all statistical evaluations with one- or two-way ANOVA or repeated-measures ANOVA. We assessed post hoc pairwise differences by the Newman-Keuls test (Prism, GraphPad).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figures

Supplementary Video 1

Supplementary Video 2

Supplementary Video 3a

Supplementary Video 3b

Supplementary Video 3c

Supplementary Video 4a

Supplementary Video 4b

Supplementary Video 4c

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NS16333), the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation, the Adelson Medical Foundation and the Roman Reed Spinal Cord Injury Research Fund of California.

Footnotes

Note: Supplementary information is available on the Nature Medicine website.

Reprints and permissions information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions

References

1. Fawcett JW, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:190–205. [PubMed]
2. Dobkin B, et al. The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: the multicenter randomized spinal cord injury locomotor trial. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 2007;21:25–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Weidner N, Ner A, Salimi N, Tuszynski M. Spontaneous corticospinal axonal plasticity and functional recovery after adult central nervous system injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:3513–3518. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Bareyre FM, et al. The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats. Nat. Neurosci. 2004;7:269–277. [PubMed]
5. Courtine G, et al. Performance of locomotion and foot grasping following a unilateral thoracic corticospinal tract lesion in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) Brain. 2005;128:2338–2358. [PubMed]
6. Ballermann M, Fouad K. Spontaneous locomotor recovery in spinal cord injured rats is accompanied by anatomical plasticity of reticulospinal fibers. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006;23:1988–1996. [PubMed]
7. Raineteau O, Schwab ME. Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001;2:263–273. [PubMed]
8. Kerschensteiner M, et al. Remodeling of axonal connections contributes to recovery in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. J. Exp. Med. 2004;200:1027–1038. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Jankowska E, Edgley SA. How can corticospinal tract neurons contribute to ipsilateral movements? A question with implications for recovery of motor functions. Neuroscientist. 2006;12:67–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Jane JA, Evans JP, Fisher LE. An investigation concerning the restitution of motor function following injury to the spinal cord. J. Neurosurg. 1964;21:167–171. [PubMed]
11. Basbaum AI. Conduction of the effects of noxious stimulation by short-fiber multisynaptic systems of the spinal cord in the rat. Exp. Neurol. 1973;40:699–716. [PubMed]
12. Stelzner DJ, Cullen JM. Do propriospinal projections contribute to hindlimb recovery when all long tracts are cut in neonatal or weanling rats? Exp. Neurol. 1991;114:193–205. [PubMed]
13. Duffy MT, Simpson SBJ, Liebich DR, Davis BM. Origin of spinal cord axons in the lizard regenerated tail: supernormal projections from local spinal neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 1990;293:208–222. [PubMed]
14. Nantwi KD, El-Bohy AA, Schrimsher GW, Reier PJ, Goshgarian HG. Spontaneous recovery in a paralyzed hemidiaphragm following upper cervical spinal cord injury in adult rats. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 1999;13:225–234.
15. Kiehn O. Locomotor circuits in the mammalian spinal cord. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2006;29:279–306. [PubMed]
16. Leblond H, L’ Esperance M, Orsal D, Rossignol S. Treadmill locomotion in the intact and spinal mouse. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:11411–11419. [PubMed]
17. Sofroniew MV, Galletly NP, Isacson O, Svendsen CN. Survival of adult basal forebrain cholinergic neurons after loss of target neurons. Science. 1990;247:338–342. [PubMed]
18. Magnuson DS, et al. Comparing deficits following excitotoxic and contusion injuries in the thoracic and lumbar spinal cord of the adult rat. Exp. Neurol. 1999;156:191–204. [PubMed]
19. Fong AJ, et al. Spinal cord–transected mice learn to step in response to quipazine treatment and robotic training. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:11738–11747. [PubMed]
20. Edgerton VR, et al. Retraining the injured spinal cord. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 2001;533:15–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Zaporozhets E, Cowley KC, Schmidt BJ. Propriospinal neurons contribute to bulbospinal transmission of the locomotor command signal in the neonatal rat spinal cord. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 2006;572:443–458. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Courtine G, et al. Can experiments in nonhuman primates expedite the translation of treatments for spinal cord injury in humans? Nat. Med. 2007;13:561–566. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Schwab ME. Repairing the injured spinal cord. Science. 2002;295:1029–1031. [PubMed]
24. Filbin MT. Myelin-associated inhibitors of axonal regeneration in the adult mammalian CNS. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003;4:703–713. [PubMed]
25. Silver J, Miller JH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004;5:146–156. [PubMed]
26. Irwin N, Li YM, O’ Toole JE, Benowitz LI. Mst3b, a purine-sensitive Ste20-like protein kinase, regulates axon outgrowth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:18320–18325. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Thuret S, Moon LD, Gage FH. Therapeutic interventions after spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006;7:628–643. [PubMed]
28. Faulkner JR, et al. Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:2143–2155. [PubMed]
29. Courtine G, et al. Kinematic and EMG determinants in quadrupedal locomotion of a non-human primate (Rhesus) J. Neurophysiol. 2005;93:3127–3145. [PubMed]
30. Recktenwald MR, et al. Effects of spaceflight on rhesus quadrupedal locomotion after return to 1G. J. Neurophysiol. 1999;81:2451–2463. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...