Logo of plosbiolPLoS BiologySubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Biol. Jul 2010; 8(7): e1000418.
Published online Jul 13, 2010. doi:  10.1371/journal.pbio.1000418
PMCID: PMC2903591

Highly Divergent Mitochondrial ATP Synthase Complexes in Tetrahymena thermophila

Jonathan A. Eisen, Academic Editor

Abstract

The F-type ATP synthase complex is a rotary nano-motor driven by proton motive force to synthesize ATP. Its F1 sector catalyzes ATP synthesis, whereas the Fo sector conducts the protons and provides a stator for the rotary action of the complex. Components of both F1 and Fo sectors are highly conserved across prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Therefore, it was a surprise that genes encoding the a and b subunits as well as other components of the Fo sector were undetectable in the sequenced genomes of a variety of apicomplexan parasites. While the parasitic existence of these organisms could explain the apparent incomplete nature of ATP synthase in Apicomplexa, genes for these essential components were absent even in Tetrahymena thermophila, a free-living ciliate belonging to a sister clade of Apicomplexa, which demonstrates robust oxidative phosphorylation. This observation raises the possibility that the entire clade of Alveolata may have invented novel means to operate ATP synthase complexes. To assess this remarkable possibility, we have carried out an investigation of the ATP synthase from T. thermophila. Blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) revealed the ATP synthase to be present as a large complex. Structural study based on single particle electron microscopy analysis suggested the complex to be a dimer with several unique structures including an unusually large domain on the intermembrane side of the ATP synthase and novel domains flanking the c subunit rings. The two monomers were in a parallel configuration rather than the angled configuration previously observed in other organisms. Proteomic analyses of well-resolved ATP synthase complexes from 2-D BN/BN-PAGE identified orthologs of seven canonical ATP synthase subunits, and at least 13 novel proteins that constitute subunits apparently limited to the ciliate lineage. A mitochondrially encoded protein, Ymf66, with predicted eight transmembrane domains could be a substitute for the subunit a of the Fo sector. The absence of genes encoding orthologs of the novel subunits even in apicomplexans suggests that the Tetrahymena ATP synthase, despite core similarities, is a unique enzyme exhibiting dramatic differences compared to the conventional complexes found in metazoan, fungal, and plant mitochondria, as well as in prokaryotes. These findings have significant implications for the origins and evolution of a central player in bioenergetics.

Author Summary

Synthesis of ATP, the currency of the cellular energy economy, is carried out by a rotary nano-motor, the ATP synthase complex, which uses proton flow to drive the rotation of protein subunits so as to produce ATP. There are two main components in mitochondrial F-type ATP synthase complexes, each made up of a number of different proteins: F1 has the catalytic sites for ATP synthesis, and Fo forms channels for proton movement and provides a bearing and stator to contain the rotary action of the motor. The two parts of the complex have to interact with each other, and critical protein subunits of the enzyme are conserved from bacteria to higher eukaryotes. We were surprised that a group of unicellular organisms called alveolates (including ciliates, apicomplexa, and dinoflagellates) seemed to lack two critical proteins of the Fo component. We have isolated intact ATP synthase complexes from the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila and examined their structure by electron microscopy and their protein composition by mass spectrometry. We found that the ATP synthase complex of this organism is quite different, both in its overall structure and in many of the associated protein subunits, from the ATP synthase in other organisms. At least 13 novel proteins are present within this complex that have no orthologs in any organism outside of the ciliates. Our results suggest significant divergence of a critical bioenergetic player within the alveolate group.

Introduction

Mitochondrial F-type ATP synthase complexes are remarkable molecular machines that link proton-motive force generated by respiration to the synthesis of ATP, the currency of energy economy in biology. The eukaryotic enzyme is made up of two structural sectors, the Fo and the F1 (hence, the complex is often called the FoF1 or F1Fo complex; complex V is another common designation, referring to the fifth and final complex of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway). The membranous Fo sector consists of a subunit c oligomer, subunit a, the peripheral stalk subunits b, d, F6 (h), and OSCP, as well as additional associated subunits depending on the species. The globular catalytic sector F1 is made up of subunits α3, β3, and the central stalk subunits γ, δ, and ε [1],[2]. The movement of protons through a channel constituted by the a and c subunits provides the energy required for the clockwise rotation of the c ring, which in turn causes the central stalk to rotate because of its close contact with the c ring. The rotation of the central stalk subunit γ creates a conformational change in the catalytic subunits β and α, which are in contact with the upper portion of γ, leading to the synthesis of ATP from bound ADP and phosphate [1],[3][6]. When the central stalk rotates, it is critical that α3β3 subcomplex is held in position, and this is accomplished by the peripheral stalk that acts as a bearing and a stator [7],[8]. The origin of proton-driven ATP synthesis by the FoF1 complex can be traced to the Eubacteria. Because of the critical nature of interactions between the Fo and F1 sectors that underlie the functioning of this complex [2], the subunit proteins that form the essential core of the complex are highly conserved, and the genes encoding them are usually readily identified in complete genomic sequences of prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

When we searched the genome sequences of apicomplexan parasites [9][12], we were intrigued by the apparent absence of genes encoding the Fo sector subunits that form the peripheral stalk (except OSCP) as well as the subunit a of ATP synthase, although F1 sector subunits and the Fo subunit c were readily detected. Clearly, a functional ATP synthase complex cannot be assembled without these subunits. We initially reasoned that the parasitic existence of these organisms might underlie the loss of a functional ATP synthase, possibly through a greater reliance on hosts for energy generation. However, publication of the macronuclear genome sequence of the ciliate T. thermophila [13] revealed that the same set of proteins apparently missing in the apicomplexans was also undetectable in this ciliate. The ciliates and the apicomplexans (along with dinoflagellates) belong to a “crown group” of thousands of organisms called alveolates that is phylogenetically distant from metazoans, fungi, and plants [14][16]. It is possible that during evolution, these subunits may have diverged in these lineages beyond the point of identification using current bioinformatics tools, although such subunits are readily detectable by the same tools in evolutionarily more distant prokaryotic genomes. Alternatively, novel proteins may have been recruited to fulfill functions of the missing subunits. It is also possible that the retained ATP synthase subunits (i.e., those forming the F1 sector) may serve functions other than ATP synthesis in these organisms. However, several studies done in the 1970s showed Tetrahymena mitochondria to be capable of oxidative phosphorylation [17][19]. Therefore, it seemed more likely that novel or highly divergent subunits may have replaced the conventional a and peripheral stalk subunits in T. thermophila, leading to a unique but fully functional enzyme. Further, such novel subunits might be shared by the members of the whole clade of alveolates, if they were adopted by an early common ancestor of the ciliates, dinoflagellates, and apicomplexans.

The ease with which Tetrahymena can be grown, the size of the cells, the abundance of mitochondria in each cell, and availability of standardized techniques to isolate mitochondria made Tetrahymena an attractive model to study the ATP synthase of alveolates. Although Tetrahymena has served as a model eukaryote and has been the subject of many seminal studies that have resulted in numerous important insights in biology [20][22], its ATP synthase has not been investigated. We show in this report that Tetrahymena's ATP synthase possesses an unusual structure, with similarity in the F1 headpiece morphology, but significant differences are seen in its dimer shape and in protein mass on the intermembrane side of the complex compared to previously studied ATP synthases from a variety of other organisms. In addition to readily identifiable F1 subunits, the enzyme appears to contain several subunits that have no known orthologs in other organisms. The absence of orthologs to these novel subunits even in apicomplexans and dinoflagellates suggests that the ciliate ATP synthase is truly unique.

Results

Oxidative Phosphorylation in T. thermophila Strain SB210

Previous studies on oxidative phosphorylation in Tetrahymena were carried out in the 1970s using strains that were not always defined. Since our goal was to take advantage of the sequenced T. thermophila genome to identify ATP synthase subunits, for all our studies we decided to use the same strain (SB210) for which the macronuclear genomic sequence has been published [13]. To confirm that mitochondria from this strain were comparable to those used in previous studies, we assessed the in situ capability of the mitochondria in digitonin-permeabilized T. thermophila cells to carry out oxidative phosphorylation, which is indicative of a functional ATP synthase and electron transport chain, in respirometry experiments. A typical oxygen consumption trace is shown in Figure 1A, in which respiration was dependent on the presence of mitochondrial substrate, succinate, and stimulated 2.4-fold by the addition of ADP. Similar results were obtained in earlier studies of mitochondria from various isolates of T. pyriformis [23]. Stimulation of the rate of respiration in this type of experiment is due to increased utilization of the proton gradient by the ATP synthase to drive the synthesis of ATP from the added ADP; the rate of respiration increases in response to the reduction of the proton gradient.

Figure 1
ADP-stimulated oxygen consumption and inhibitor insensitivity of ATPase activity in T. thermophila mitochondria.

Under appropriate conditions, FoF1 ATP synthases are capable of the reverse reaction, i.e., ATP hydrolysis. Indeed, in a number of organisms the reverse reaction is important for maintenance of the proton electrochemical gradient under specific growth conditions or life stages [24][27]. A coupled spectrophotometric assay (see Materials and Methods) was used to assess the ATP hydrolase activity in T. thermophila mitochondrial preparations. Reaction traces (Figure S1) show that T. thermophila SB210 ATP hydrolase exhibits time- and ATP-dependent activation, as seen in other FoF1 ATP synthases/hydrolases [28]. T. thermophila mitochondria had a somewhat lower specific ATPase activity compared to yeast (unpublished data); however, it is possible that the measured activity represents only a fraction of the ATP synthase complexes present in the mitochondrial membranes, since isolated dimeric complexes exhibited negligible hydrolase activity (see below). The measurable ATPase activity also showed unusual resistance to the classical FoF1 ATP synthase inhibitors oligomycin and sodium azide (Figure 1B and 1C). Similar resistance to oligomycin, as well as other inhibitors, was previously reported in mitochondria from T. pyriformis [23],[29].

ATP synthase generally forms the second largest complex after complex I and runs as high molecular weight bands in blue native (BN) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) [30]. T. thermophila mitochondria were solubilized with digitonin or dodecyl maltoside and separated on a 3%–10% gradient BN gel to resolve high molecular weightweight complexes (Figure 2A). We assessed the ATP hydrolase activity of the sample bands using an in-gel ATPase assay that generates a white precipitate. In digitonin-solubilized fractions, the principal regions of ATPase activity were found lower down in the gel (below band 3), and thus may be due to monomers and/or separate catalytic F1 head pieces (Figure 2B). Even after overnight incubation (8–12 h), we saw only a very limited amount of precipitate in the top two bands, which contain dimeric ATP synthase complexes on the basis of single particle electron microscopy results (see below), indicating very weak ATPase activity, in contrast to active dimeric and higher oligomeric forms of ATP synthase complexes previously reported in other species [30][33].

Figure 2
BN-PAGE of solubilized T. thermophila mitochondrial membranes.

Novel Structural Features of Tetrahymena ATP Synthase

The complexes from the highest molecular weight bands (Figure 2A, bands 1, 2, and 3) were electroeluted under gentle conditions that largely preserved their structure and analyzed by single particle electron microscopy. In the samples from bands 1 and 2, we observed structures resembling dimeric ATP synthase complexes (complex V2), as well as apparent supercomplexes of complex I (NADH dehydrogenase), and a dimer of complex III (complex I–III2). Band 3 appeared to contain complex III dimers (Figure S2). Since the electroeluted particles from these bands were quite uniform, without breakdown products, we were able to select homogenous datasets of 40,000 single particle images obtained after digitonin or dodecyl maltoside solubilization and used them to generate averaged 2-D projection maps. Analysis of the projections indicated that subsets of projections from digitonin and dodecyl maltoside comprised the same types of projections. Hence, we combined the data to improve the quality of final images. Side-view projection maps of T. thermophila dimeric ATP synthase showed particles attached in a parallel and flat position on the carbon support film (Figure 3A–3C) or in a slightly tilted position (Figure 3D). Some dimers appeared to have a large protein attached to the Fo sector (Figure 3E, blue arrowhead). As estimated from its surface area, the mass of this domain could be as much as 200 kDa. In addition, we also obtained top views of the dimers (Figure 3F and 3G). The best maps had a resolution of about 1.5 nm, which permitted recognition of specific known and novel features as depicted in a schematic model (Figure 3H). The projection maps indicated that the all structural elements of mammalian and Escherichia coli enzyme were present, including the F1 headpiece consisting of α3β3 subunits [34], the rotor composed of the subunit c ring, as well as the central stalk (rotor) consisting of the γ, δ, and ε subunits. In addition, OSCP, the uppermost stator component (Figure 3B and 3C, see green arrowheads) was present, although it was apparently lost from a substantial number of projections (Figure 3A). The headpieces are separated by at least 2 nm, and there is protein density present in the dimer interface region between the two Fo parts (marked red in H) that appears structurally similar to that previously observed in the alga and yeast ATP synthases [35],[36]. All other visible densities (marked blue) appear to be unique to T. thermophila dimeric ATP synthase since they have not been observed in any other species. There were two domains attached at the interface of the monomers. A large domain, estimated to be at least 100 kDa, was attached to the bottom side of the complex; another was at the matrix-exposed side close to the F1 head pieces and seemed to be connected to the catalytic F1 part (Figure 3C, orange arrowhead). The latter density could represent novel subunits that help the two monomers associate with each other. Interestingly, the dimer also had distinct novel membrane-bound densities at the extreme left and right position of the c subunit rotors (Figure 3A, blue arrowheads). Some dimers appeared to have a large protein attached to the Fo sector (Figure 3E, dark-blue arrowhead). As estimated from its surface area, the mass of this domain could be as much as 200 kDa. Furthermore, the two monomers appeared to be parallel to each other, rather than forming an acute angle as seen in the other species examined thus far. This finding was dramatically different from projections of the yeast, Polytomella, and bovine complexes [35][39].

Figure 3
2-D projection maps of dimeric ATP synthase from Tetrahymena thermophila.

A final question is the position of the two stators of the dimer. This question is difficult to answer because the stators are strongly overlapping with the F1 headpieces. One possibility is that they are at the extreme periphery. In some views there is a faint connection between the headpiece and the membrane (Figure 3B, yellow arrowhead). This connection becomes stronger upon tilting (Figure 3D). On the other side, there is ample space in the center of the dimer where an extensive structure resides in between the F1 headpieces. This structure is connected to the headpiece (Figure 3C, orange arrowhead) and may hide the stator. The latter position may be considered more likely by reason of structural homology. The yeast, Polytomella, and bovine ATP synthase complexes have one stator per monomer [35],[37][39], but fully lack the peripheral domains marked light blue (Figure 3C).

Additional Supercomplexes in Bands 1–3

In addition to dimeric ATP synthase, bands 1 and 2 contained complex I–III2 supercomplex and projection maps of its side and top view were analyzed (Figure S2). These maps resemble their counterparts in Arabidopsis and other organisms [37],[40],[41]. Complex III2 was located at the tip of the membrane arm of complex I (Figure S2A, white arrowhead). A small number of complexes lacked a part of the hydrophilic arm (Figure S2C, black arrowhead), which has been observed in many complex I preparations. The assignment of the position of complex III2 in the supercomplex was confirmed by a structural analysis of single dimeric complex III, eluted from band 3 (Figure S2D). Features of the matrix-exposed domain, which are part of the subunits 1 and 2 of complex III, were similar in both types of particles (Figure S2A, D white arrowheads). Complex III2 from T. thermophila was structurally comparable to its counterpart in Arabidopsis (Figure S2E), but not identical [40]. Overall, the I–III2 supercomplex and the dimer of complex III were structurally similar to those of many other organisms, suggesting conservation of these respiratory complexes in T. thermophila.

Conserved and Novel Subunits in ATP Synthase

The three high molecular weight bands identified by BN-PAGE were excised from gels for analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry (also known as liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry or LC/MS/MS). Samples excised from gel runs were divided and separately digested with trypsin or chymotrypsin to improve the chances of detecting hydrophobic proteins. The digests were subjected to LC/MS/MS analyses as described in the Materials and Methods. Overall, peptides originating from 59 proteins were identified in band 1. The main annotated proteins in band 1 were subunits of respiratory complexes I, II, III, and V, as well as some additional proteins. In band 2 we detected peptides originating from 50 proteins, including subunits of complexes I, III, and V. In band 3, there were 21 protein hits, including subunits of complex III. There were also many unannotated proteins and some apparent contaminating proteins (i.e., proteins that are not known to be part of oxidative phosphorylation complexes) in each of the three bands. Data for all these peptides are summarized in Table S1; LC/MS/MS data for peptides detected in bands 1–3 are given in Table S2.

The presence of multiple complexes in the BN-PAGE bands made it difficult to assign any of the observed hypothetical proteins to specific complexes. To achieve further separation of the complexes, we carried out 2-D BN/BN-PAGE. The presence of 0.03% dodecyl maltoside in the cathode buffer of the second dimension BN-PAGE was strong enough to dissociate Band 1 and Band 2 of the first dimension BN-PAGE into two individual spots (Figure 2C, designated spot 1 and spot 2 from band 1, and spots 3 and 4 from band 2). Band 3 ran as a single spot, which was designated as spot 5 (Figure 2C). The dissociation pattern observed in 2-D BN/BN-PAGE was reproducible. Samples were excised from the central portion of each spot for analysis. A set of spots from one 2-D gel was digested with trypsin and a set from a second was digested with chymotrypsin for LC/MS/MS analysis. The results revealed that Spot 1, and to a lesser extent, spot 3 contained conventional ATP synthase subunits including α, β, γ, OSCP, and c (ATP9), whereas spots 2, 4, and 5 largely did not, but rather contained subunits normally found in complexes I and III, as well as other proteins. A summary of data from all five spots is given in Table S1, and the LC/MS/MS data for peptides detected in spots 1–5 are given in Table S3. In addition to the annotated ATP synthase subunits, spot 1 LC/MS/MS results included three additional proteins normally not associated with ATP synthases (branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase family protein, lipid A-disaccharide synthase, and peptidase M16 inactive domain-containing protein; however the latter two may be contaminants as described below), and 15 hypothetical or uncharacterized proteins that have no obvious homology to any other proteins in the database (Table 1). As noted in a previous study of the T. thermophila mitochondrial proteome by Smith et al. [42], many of the original gene models merit some corrections. In our analysis, we utilized appropriately corrected sequences for several of the proteins on the basis of data from Smith et al., extant EST data, or comparison with data from the related ciliate, Paramecium tetraurelia. Among the corrected uncharacterized proteins we detected low, but significant, similarity to two additional ATP synthase subunits—118355322 to F1 subunit δ and 118360532 to Fo subunit d (Table 2; evidence for these assignments is provided in Texts S1 and S2). On the basis of the prevalence of peptides from known ATP synthase subunits in spot 1 data (see Table 1, “Unique Peptides” column), their near absence from spots 2, 4, and 5, and the near absence in spot 1 of peptides from known subunits of other mitochondrial complexes (Tables S1 and S3), we considered it likely that the remaining uncharacterized proteins in Table 2 were authentic subunits of the complex V dimer. On the other hand, the peptides from two of the annotated proteins, peptidase M16 inactive domain-containing protein and lipid A-disaccharide synthase, were predominantly found in spot 5 and in spots 3 and 4, respectively (Tables 1 and S3). These proteins may thus represent contaminants present in spot 1 because of trailing in the gels.

Table 1
Assigned proteins detected in BN-PAGE Spot 1 by LC/MS/MS.
Table 2
Unassigned proteins detected in BN-PAGE spot 1 by LC/MS/MS.

Subunits of the Fo Sector

While putative Fo subunits c, d, and OSCP were detected, subunits with sequence similarity to the structurally and mechanistically critical integral membrane subunits a and b were not found. However, there were proteins among the LC/MS/MS results with appropriately positioned predicted transmembrane segments that could be evaluated as possible highly divergent subunits or novel functional replacements for these subunits. Ymf66 is an integral membrane protein with approximately eight predicted transmembrane helices. Interestingly, the corresponding region in Paramecium mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is split into two open reading frames (ORFs) [43]. Ymf66 has several features that are characteristic of Fo subunit a in a general fashion: (1) it is encoded by mtDNA (all known subunits a, with one exception, are mitochondrially encoded); (2) it is a multispan membrane protein (subunit a is the only Fo subunit with >>2 transmembrane helices); (3) it has a conserved arginine residue embedded in a predicted transmembrane helix in the C-terminal region of the protein (subunit a has a conserved and functionally essential arginine, located in the fourth transmembrane helix in the well-studied E. coli subunit (Figures 4 and S2); and (4) the same transmembrane helix also contains another arginine residue that is conserved at a similar position in most ATP synthase a subunits (except vertebrates where it is usually replaced by a glutamine). An examination of Ymf66 from five Tetrahymena species, as well as from Paramecium, revealed that all these features including appropriately placed arginines were absolutely conserved, providing additional support to our proposition that this protein substitutes for the ATP synthase a subunit in ciliates.

Figure 4
Position of arginines in putative TM6 of Ymf66 and possible alignment with the region of ATP synthase subunits a that contains the conserved Arg.

We found five proteins (146185889, 118398278, 118366175, 146161614, 146180703) that could be considered candidates to functionally replace subunit b, on the basis that they contain one to two hydrophobic regions in the N-terminal half of the protein followed by a more hydrophilic C terminus, and fall roughly within the size range of this subunit (predicted topologies of these proteins are given in Figure S4). Secondary structure predictions were consistent with this possibility in the case of the first three proteins (146185889, 118398278, and 118366175), which were predicted to have a predominance of alpha helical structure throughout the region C-terminal to the hydrophobic section (Figure S4). The known and predicted structure of this section of the bovine subunit b is almost entirely composed of an extended α-helix, allowing the matrix section of the subunit to reach from the membrane to near the top of the F1 subcomplex [8]. One or more of these candidate proteins could participate in forming the stator or be associated with one of the apparently novel membrane-associated domains observed in the Tetrahymena structure.

Evolutionary Relationships of ATP Synthase Subunits

The structural and proteomic analyses seem to suggest unique evolutionary history for many subunits of Tetrahymena ATP synthase. Whereas some of the subunits were clearly recognizable as orthologs of ATP synthase subunits from other organisms, there were many others that seem to be limited to ciliates. To understand evolutionary provenance and relationships of the recognizable subunits, we carried out phylogenetic analyses of these subunits. Alignments of the Tetrahymena ATP synthase subunits β, γ, δ, and c with orthologs from a broad range of other species were constructed and used to calculate their apparent phylogenetic relationships (Figures 5 and S5; Text S1). The sequences of the catalytic β subunits are well-conserved among all species, with numerous sequence positions that exhibit total amino acid identity. The F1 rotor subunit γ is somewhat less conserved but still has a high degree of similarity among species. The phylogenetic reconstructions that included ciliate and apicomplexan β subunit (Figure S5) or γ subunit (Figure 5A) exhibit a similar relationship among the major groups (metazoa, fungi, Viridiplantae, alveolates) as that seen in many phylogenetic studies [44][46]. The relatively moderate branch lengths of the ciliate clade (Figure 5A) suggest a rate of genetic change similar to the average of other groups. The kinetoplastids, in contrast, exhibit very long branch lengths, suggesting they have experienced a period of rapid divergence. Proteomic analysis of Trypanosoma brucei ATP synthase has recently revealed divergence of this complex as well [47]. When we examined the less well-conserved F1 δ and Fo c subunits, we found a different pattern. The alveolates, especially the ciliates, exhibit very long branches indicating an accelerated rate of change (Figure 5B). For these smaller and more divergent subunits, the overall phylogeny of the major groups is less well reproduced, probably owing to their greater divergence and shorter length, i.e., there are a relatively small number of positions that can be reliably aligned, and in addition, a degree of saturation at some sites cannot be ruled out. Thus, the well-conserved subunits (α, β, γ) form a contiguous subset of the complex apparently undergoing modest evolutionary change in ciliates, while the δ and c subunits and the evidently even more divergent a-like subunit (Ymf66) may represent a subset coevolving at a much more rapid rate. We assessed one possible specific instance of coevolution by comparing sequences from the interface regions of the δ and c subunits. This interface has been characterized in bacterial ATP synthase and, along with the γ-c and δ-γ interactions, is critical for the transfer of the rotational movement of the c subunit ring to the central stalk [48],[49]. In a functionally essential protein–protein interface region, changes in one partner that affect the interface would normally be matched by compensating changes in the interacting partner that act to maintain function [50],[51]. The divergence of the interface regions of the δ and c subunits (Figure 5C) can be construed as a result of coevolution that probably required a series of compensatory changes. One evident hypothesis, which could potentially be tested experimentally, is the interaction of acidic residues acquired in ciliate subunits c adjacent to the conserved loop residues (RNP) with the basic residue acquired in ciliate subunits δ next to the position of the otherwise conserved histidine (Figure 5C).

Figure 5
Phylogenetic trees inferred for subunits γ and c and alignment of the interface regions of subunits δ and c.

Discussion

Unique Structural Features of Tetrahymena ATP Synthase

There are three types of multiprotein complexes that link ion movement across the membrane with rotational catalysis of ATP synthesis/hydrolysis: the archaeal A-type and bacterial/mitochondrial F-type ATP synthases use H+ (or sometimes Na+) ions to drive ATP synthesis, whereas the V-type ATPases hydrolyze ATP to pump H+ against its concentration gradient. Shared structural features of these molecular machines, such as distinct sectors that constitute the catalytic, ion transport, and stator functions, suggest a common evolutionary ancestry possibly dating back to the origin of cellular life. In general, the individual A-, F-, or V-type ATP synthases/hydrolases are highly conserved along vast evolutionary distances [52], although some species-specific features/subunits are also seen. In contrast, we have described here a very unusual F-type ATP synthase in T. thermophila. The overall structure of this complex determined by single particle electron microscopy projections is dramatically different from any other ATP synthase examined. In organisms as divergent as E. coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Polytomella, and the cow Bos taurus, the overall structures of ATP synthases are very similar [37],[53]. The most obvious difference in T. thermophila is the parallel disposition of individual ATP synthase monomers compared to the angular arrangement seen in all other organisms. It has recently been suggested that the angular arrangement of ATP synthases in mitochondria may be important for the curvature of the cristae tips formed by the inner mitochondrial membrane [54]. Tetrahymena (as well as other alveolate) mitochondria, however, have tubular cristae that do not form the curved tips seen in mitochondria from other organisms [55]. We suggest it as a possibility that the parallel arrangements of the ATP synthase monomers might dictate tubular cristae arrangement in ciliate (and perhaps in all alveolate) mitochondria.

A second unusual structural feature of the ATP synthase dimer is the presence of novel additional membrane-embedded domains that flank the dimer, and could be connected to the F1 headpiece. Such structures have not been observed in any ATP synthase thus far. This is in contrast to all other F-type and V-type ATPases. All studied F-type ATP synthases have just one stator, attached to subunit a. V-type ATP synthases have two to three stators [56],[57], but they merge together at one point where they connect to the c subunits ring via subunit a.

A third unusual feature is the presence of a large domain attached to the intermembrane part of one of the monomers. Again, this has not been observed in any ATP synthase and the significance of which is unclear. Remarkably, prokaryotic ATP synthases are structurally more similar to their mitochondrial counterparts than is T. thermophila mitochondrial ATP synthase.

Subunit Proteins of ATP Synthase

We were able to resolve the large mitochondrial complexes through 2-D BN/BN-PAGE, which permitted a proteomic cataloguing of the subunit proteins that constitute T. thermophila ATP synthase. While it is possible that the proteomic analysis may have missed some of the component proteins, those that we did detect could be assigned with a reasonable degree of confidence as being subunits of the complex. Of the 24 proteins present in spot 1, 22 are the likely constituents of the ATP synthase. Only six of these were annotated as subunits of ATP synthase. On the basis of our analysis, two hypothetical proteins could be assigned as subunit d and δ; that leaves 14 proteins with no assigned functions, one of which has homologues believed to be oxidoreductases in many other organisms. Thus, 13 proteins that seem to be part of mitochondrial ATP synthase complex in T. thermophila have no detectable orthologs in any organism other than ciliates. The proteomic data and even phylogenetic analyses of generally conserved subunits seem to confirm the notion from structural studies that ciliate ATP synthase is highly divergent from its mitochondrial or bacterial counterparts. This degree of divergence is also apparent when one examines ciliate mitochondrial DNA. The 47-kb mtDNA in Tetrahymena encodes 44 ORFs, 20 of which have no orthologs in any organisms other than ciliates and have no function assigned to them [43],[58],[59]. To put this in perspective, the protozoan Reclinomonas americana has 67 mitochondrial ORFs, the largest number known thus far, of which 66 have orthologs in other species with assigned functions [60]. This finding would suggest either that the unassigned ORFs in ciliates have undergone highly accelerated evolutionary divergence or that ciliate mtDNAs have acquired almost half of their genes from sources other than the α-proteobacterial ancestral endosymbiont that lies at the origin of all extant mitochondria. Our extensive sequence searches have failed to find homologous sequences to the unassigned ciliate mtDNA ORF proteins or the 12 nuclearly encoded subunits of T. thermophila ATP synthase in any of the currently available collections of ORFs, which include metagenomes as well as Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea Genomes available at the Joint Genome Institute. Thus, the provenance of these ciliate-specific mitochondrial proteins remains obscure.

Proposed Candidates for Fo Subunits a and b

A major motivation for our study was the apparent lack of a gene encoding the subunit a of the Fo sector in complete genomic sequences of any alveolate. Because this subunit, in association with the multimeric subunit c ring, forms the channel through which protons move and drive the catalytic rotation of the enzyme, its absence would be incompatible with proton motive force driven ATP synthesis. Through proteomic analysis of isolated ATP synthase complexes and careful sequence comparison we now propose that the function of subunit a could be served by the highly divergent or novel protein Ymf66 encoded by the mtDNA. This protein is predicted to have eight transmembrane helices, one of which has buried arginines in positions where they could form critical residues for the proton channel as reported in other ATP synthases. Other than this tenuous but potentially critical homology, Ymf66 bears no discernable similarities to any known subunit a from any organism, except for the fact that, like most other subunits a, it too is encoded by mtDNA and is predicted to be a polytopic membrane protein. Remarkably, as discussed above, Ymf66 has no discernable ortholog in any organism other than ciliates.

Genes encoding the Fo subunit b were also not detected in any alveolate. Subunit b forms a crucial part of the stator that extends from the membrane to near the top of the globular F1 sector. The role of the stator is to stabilize α3β3 from rotation caused by the centrally positioned γ stalk. Again, the absence of a stator would be incompatible with ATP synthase function. Single particle electron microscopy projections, however, revealed the presence of not one but two stator structures in T. thermophila ATP synthase. Taking into consideration the requirement that subunit b has its N-terminal sequence buried in the membrane and rest of its amino acids forming extended mostly hydrophilic α-helical structure, we have identified three proteins detected in T. thermophila ATP synthase as candidate substitutes for the b subunit. It is not uncommon to have the stator structure formed by homo- or heterodimers of b subunits. Again, it was not possible to detect homologues of these proteins in any organisms other than ciliates.

Implications for Other Alveolates

Dinoflagellates and Apicomplexa are two sister clades of ciliates that form the crown group alveolates. Therefore, it is intriguing that these related organisms seem to lack any of the unassigned proteins that are part of the ATP synthase complex in T. thermophila. Mitochondrial evolution in alveolates, however, is complicated [61]. Unlike the ~44 ORFs encoded by the ciliate mtDNA [43],[58],[59], dinoflagellate and apicomplexan mtDNAs encode just three proteins [61],[62]. The massive loss of ORFs is also accompanied by unusual structural arrangements of mtDNA and scrambling of rRNA genes; some apicomplexans have actually lost the mitochondrial genome altogether [63],[64]. However, all these organisms, including those without mtDNA, continue to encode at least α and β subunits of ATP synthase. It is not clear whether these proteins are assembled into a functional ATP synthase, but there are indications that mitochondria are capable of ATP synthesis in at least some of apicomplexans. The question as to what constitutes the functional ATP synthase in these organisms remains unanswered. If what we have reported here for the ciliates is an indication, answers to this question could prove interesting and important, for Apicomplexan pathogens extract an enormous toll from humanity. The unusual and highly divergent ATP synthases could form attractive targets for selective therapeutic approaches.

Materials and Methods

Growth of T. thermophila (SB 210) and Isolation of Mitochondria

T. thermophila SB 210 cells were grown in proteose peptone media and mitochondria were isolated as previously described [19],[65],[66]. Briefly, 500 ml cultures were harvested at late log phase of growth by centrifugation at 1,000g for 5 min. The cells were washed with mitochondria isolation buffer (MIB; 0.3 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1mM EGTA, and 12.5 mM HEPES (KOH [pH 7.4]); trehalose was substituted for sucrose on two occasions with no evident changes in properties of the mitochondrial preparation), and were resuspended in 5 volume of MIB. The suspension was homogenized in a 30 ml Kontes tight fitting glass hand homogenizer on ice until 80%–90% of the cells were broken. The whole homogenate was transferred to a 50-ml conical tube and centrifuged at 300g for 5 min at 4°C in an HS-4 Sorvall rotor. The supernatant was centrifuged at 7,000g for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting fraction consists of a hard brown pellet at the bottom followed by cream-colored layer of mitochondria and a loose whitish layer above it. The supernatant and most of the whitish layer was carefully removed. Five volume of MIB was added gently to the pellet and gently shaken to remove the creamy mitochondrial layer. The crude mitochondrial fraction was resuspended in 10 ml of MIB containing 10% percoll and was centrifuged at 5,300g for 5 min. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was washed with 10% percoll again. To remove Percoll, the pellet was washed with MIB and centrifuged at 5,300g for 5 min at 4°C. The resulting pellet was resuspended with 1.5 ml of MIB and was layered on top of a discontinuous sucrose gradient (3 ml of 30% [w/v], 3 ml of 45%, and 3 ml of 60% sucrose) and was centrifuged at 22,000 rpm for 2 h at 4°C in a Sorvall SW27 rotor. A cream-colored band formed at about the position of the 45%–60% sucrose junction and was collected as the purified mitochondrial fraction. This fraction was resuspended in 10 ml of MIB and was centrifuged at 5,300g for 5 min to remove excess sucrose. The step was repeated again, and the final pellet was resuspended in a small volume of MIB buffer. Protein concentration was estimated by Bradford assay.

1-D BN-PAGE, ATPase Activity, and Electroelution

Mitochondria (1 mg protein) were resuspended in water and pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C in a Sorvall SW 50.1 rotor. The pellet was resuspended in mitochondria solubilization buffer (50 mM Nacl, 50 mM Imidazole/HCl [pH 7.0], 2 mM 6-aminohexanoic acid, and 1 mM EDTA, at 4°C). Detergent concentrations were adjusted to 5 µg digitonin per µg of mitochondrial protein, or 1.5 µg dodecyl maltoside per µg of mitochondrial protein by addition of 20% stock solutions of the respective detergent. After incubation for 30 min on ice, the sample was centrifuged for 30 min at 30,000 rpm in the SW 50.1 Sorvall rotor. Coomassie dye from a 5% G-250 stock suspension was added to the supernatant to give a detergent/dye ratio of 8. The sample was loaded in a 3%–10% BN-PAGE gradient gel and the gel was run for 3–4 h with an initial constant voltage of 100 V, followed by a constant current of 15 mA, as described by Wittig et al. [67].

In-gel ATPase activity of the enzyme was measured by incubating the BN gel strips in a buffer containing 35 mM Tris.HCl (pH 8.4), 270 mM glycine, 14 mM MgSO4, 0.2% Pb(NO3)2, and 4 mM ATP at room temperature for overnight as described [68].

For electroelution, protein complexes from the bands were cut with scalpel and transferred into electroeluter chambers (D-Tube Dialyzer, Novagen). The dialyzer tubes were pretreated with 1% ethanolamine and rinsed with ultrapure H2O. Electroelution was done overnight in the electroelution buffer (25 mM tricine, 7.5 mM Bis-Tris, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [pH 7.0]) containing either 0.1% digitonin or 0.03% dodecyl maltoside at 150 V in 4°C as described [69].

2-D BN-PAGE

2-D BN/BN-PAGE was carried out as described by Sunderhaus et al. [70] with slight modifications. The 1-D gel strip was incubated with 0.03% dodecyl maltoside (Anatrace) for 10 min. After incubation, the gel strip was placed in between the glass plates and a 4%–12% gradient gel was poured. After polymerization, the space between the 1-D gel strip and 4%–12% gradient gel was filled with a 3.5% stacking gel. Dodecyl maltoside to a final concentration of 0.03% was added in the cathode buffer and the gel was run overnight at a constant current of 15 mA.

Respirometry of Permeabilized T. thermophila Cells

The relative amount of digitonin required to permeabilize 99% of freshly harvested cells was determined immediately prior to the experiment by monitoring loss of trypan blue exclusion after a 5 min incubation of cells suspended in MIB plus digitonin, and was found to be 0.135 mg digitonin per mg cellular protein. Cells containing 315 mg protein were incubated for 5 min. with digitonin under the above conditions, then diluted 6-fold with MIB, recovered by centrifugation, washed once more with MIB, and resuspended at ~15 mg/ml. Oxygen consumption by the permeabilized cells was measured with a microcathode oxygen electrode (number 1302, Strathkelvin Instruments) in a closed respirometry cell (MT200, Strathkelvin Instruments) with a 100-μl working volume maintained at 32°C. The system was calibrated the same day as each experiment per the manufacturer's instructions. The working solution was MIB containing 2 mM magnesium chloride and 2 mM potassium phosphate with additions as indicated in the figure caption.

Spectrophotometric ATP Hydrolase Assay

ATPase activity was determined using a coupled assay modified from Pullman et al. [71], in which NADH oxidation is coupled to ATP hydrolysis using lactate dehydrogenase and pyruvate kinase. The assay was performed at 35°C in a stirred cuvette with a final volume of 1 ml containing 50 mM HEPES (KOH [pH 7.5]), 2 mM MgSO4, 3 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 0.3 mM NADH, four units lactate dehydrogenase (Sigma), four units pyruvate kinase (Sigma), 0.6 mg/ml dodecylmaltoside, ~200 µg protein of mitochondrial preparation and including inhibitors of adenylate kinase (10 µM P1,P5-di(adenosine-5′) pentaphosphate and 5 mM AMP), vacuolar ATPase (0.2 µM concanamycin A), complex IV (2 mM KCN), and complex I (34 µM rotenone). The oxidation of NADH was recorded with a modified SLM-AMINCO DW2C dual wavelength spectrophotometer (On-Line Instrument Systems, Inc.) in dual mode (341–401 nm). Dual wavelength spectroscopy ameliorates the effects of light scattering with turbid samples. The specific ATPase activity was quantitated by measuring the slopes of the linear postactivation (steepest) part of the assay traces.

Single Particle Electron Microscopy and Image Analysis

Electroeluted complexes were applied on carbon coated copper grids and negatively stained with 2% uranyl acetate by droplet method. Images were recorded on a CM12 electron microscope (Philips) operated at 120 kV with slow scan 4 k×4 k CCD camera (Gatan) at 78,000 magnification and pixel size 3.8 Å at the level of specimen. Single particle analysis was performed with the Groningen Image Processing (GRIP) software package as described by Dudkina et al. [35],[40].

Proteomic Analysis

Bands or spots were excised from BN-PAGE gels and processed with either trypsin or chymotrypsin according to the Coomassie stained gel protocol described by Gundry et al. [72]. All samples were desalted with C18 Omix tips (Varian) according to manufacture's protocol. Peptides were analyzed using the LTQ (ThermoFinnigan) in gradient mode with the following gradients; 8.5%–30% of 0.1% formic acid/90% acetonitrile (30 min), 60% of 0.1% formic acid/90% acetonitrile (18 min), and to 100% of 0.1% formic acid/90% acetonitrile (22 min) with a flow rate of 300 nl/min. The peptides were separated on a hand-packed 75-µm reversed phase column consisting of YMC ODS-AQ (5-µm particle size and 120-A pore size). Using an electrospray voltage of 2.2 kV, precursor scans were taken from m/z of 350–1,800 m/z and the top eight ions picked for MS/MS.

The acquired MS/MS data were searched with Sorcerer 2-Sequest (SageN Research Products), with postsearch analysis using Scaffold (Proteome Software). Peak extraction was performed using Sorcerer 2 SEQUEST default settings. Data were searched using all species in the Trembl and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) databases as well as in the custom Smith et al. database [42]. The following criteria were used: a full trypsin or full chymotrypsin digestion, all species, and the variable modifications of carbamidomethyl and oxidation (methionine). Peptide mass tolerance was set to 1.2 amu. All MS/MS spectra were manually examined using Scaffold and low quality spectra were removed. Protein redundancy was then removed by using the Blast tool to assess protein similarity.

Phylogenetic Analysis

Sequences of representative species from a broad range of eukaryotic groups were collected from the NCBI refseq protein database for most of the ATP synthase subunits that were identified in T. thermophila. In a few cases, the sequence set was extended with one or two translations of complimentary DNA (cDNA)/expressed sequence tag data (see Table S5); in these instances, we verified that the sequences used matched the relevant genomic data or were highly similar to sequence data from closely related species. Identifications of sequences used for alignment are given in Table S5. Sequences were aligned using ClustalX [73], TCoffee (Expresso) [74], and MAFFT (L-INS and/or E-INS strategy) [75]; the alignments were compared and unambiguously aligned positions chosen for phylogenetic analyses. MrBayes [76] was used for Bayesian inference [77] simulations. The program was run with two chains for at least 1.2 million generations, sampled every 60 generations, and analysis continued if necessary until probable convergence was indicated by stability of the log likelihood values and the standard deviation of split frequencies for at least 0.6 million generations. A preliminary run using the “mixed” amino acid model was used to find the optimal amino acid model, which was the “WAG” model [78] with our datasets, and the final analyses were run using the WAG model and assuming invariable positions and a gamma-distributed substitution rate heterogeneity [79], the “WAG+Γ+I” model. Probable convergence was verified postsimulation by the randomness of the plot of log likelihood values and potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) values of 1.00. PhyML [80] was used for maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis [81] using the WAG+Γ+I model and calculating support with 200 nonparametric bootstrap repeat calculations (using α and proportion invariant parameters fixed at the values optimized for the real data to minimize computation time). Phylogenetic tree output was viewed and arranged for presentation using the Tree Explorer module in the MEGA 4 package [82].

Protein Sequence Searches and Analyses

To attempt to identify homologies for the unassigned protein sequences discovered in spot 1 from 2-D BN-PAGE by the LC/LC/MS analysis, comparative searches were conducted using multiple algorithms and protein databases: (1) BLAST search [83],[84] repeated with all three available BLOSUM amino acid matrices at NCBI databases; also repeated at the CAMERA metagenomic database [85] available at http://camera.calit2.net/. (2) SSEARCH at EBI (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/fasta33/index.html?program=SSEARCH), which conducts a rigorous Smith-Waterman search [86]. (3) Sequence search at Pfam database version 23 and 24 [87], which is based on the HMMER hidden Markov model program. (4) COMPASS, a generalized Psi-BLAST alignment profile to alignment profile query [88] available at http://prodata.swmed.edu/compass/compass.php.); for this purpose, the T. thermophila proteins were aligned with their orthologs from P. tetraurelia (and other ciliates if available).

Significant similarities found are indicated in Tables 2 and S4, but in the majority of cases, no additional significant matches were obtained. Texts S1 and S2 contain detailed examples of the results of many of these searches.

The prediction of transmembrane helices in membrane proteins was carried out using TMHMM (v2) (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/), TMMOD (http://liao.cis.udel.edu/website/servers/TMMOD/scripts/frame.php?p=submit), and TOPCONS (http://topcons.cbr.su.se/index.php) [89][92]. Protein secondary structure predictions were made using the PSIPRED Protein Structure Prediction Server (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/) [93],[94].

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Typical reaction traces of Tetrahymena ATPase activity. The activity was measured by a coupled spectrophotometric assay (Materials and Methods), minus and plus high concentrations of inhibitors (20 µM oligomycin and 75 mM sodium azide). Note the time-dependent increase in the rate of ATP hydrolysis. The yellow overlay box on the first trace indicates the approximate range of the linear, steady state enzyme activity attained after activation.

(1.23 MB TIF)

Figure S2

Projections of I–III2 supercomplex and complex III2 from Tetrahymena thermophila (A–D) and A. thaliana (E). (A) Average of 2,217 projections of I–III2 supercomplex representing the side view. (B) Average of 1,657 projections of the top view of I–III2 supercomplex. (C) Top view of I–III2 supercomplex lacking the NADH-oxidizing domain of complex I (sum of 512 projections). (D) Average of 768 projections of complex III2 in side view position. (E) Projection of dimeric complex III from Arabidopsis in a similar orientation [40]. White arrowheads mark the core 1 and 2 subunits of complex III2 in frames (A) and (D), and black arrowheads point to the presence (B) or absence (C) of the peripheral arm of complex I. All data are results from combined data of proteins extracted with digitonin and those extracted with dodecyl maltoside except for complex III2, which was solubilized with digitonin. Bar = 10 nm.

(1.25 MB TIF)

Figure S3

Ymf66 and ATP synthase subunit a transmembrane topology predictions and position of conserved Arg residue. (A) Graphical representations of TM topology calculated by TMHMM v2. Red rectangles at the top of each plot delineate the predicted transmembrane regions. Darker red rectangles in the E. coli plot (A2) indicate the extent of TM helices estimated using the results of biochemical and molecular genetic studies (see [95] and references therein). An asterisk in each plot denotes the position of the conserved Arg residue in subunit a or of a possible corresponding Arg in ciliate Ymf66. Plots shown: A1, T. thermophila Ymf66; A2, E. coli Fo a; A3 B. taurus Fo a; A4, A. thaliana Fo a; A5, R. americana Fo a; A6, T. brucei Fo a. (B) Position of arginines in putative TM6 of Ymf66 and possible alignment with the region of ATP synthase subunits a that contains the conserved Arg (reproduction of Figure 4 for convenience). Residues that are identical to or chemically similar to the consensus amino acid are shown with reverse coloration, and the conserved Arg is shown in red and highlighted. The extent of known (E. coli subunit a) and predicted (Ymf66) TM helices is indicated with dark red bars.

(0.27 MB PDF)

Figure S4

Secondary structure predictions for the C-terminal domains of putative T. thermophila ATP synthase subunits having hydrophobic segments in their N-terminal regions. Secondary structure was predicted by the PSIPred server (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/) for the sequences shown. The TM predictions are shown to indicate the approximate location of hydrophobic sections in the full sequences. The prediction for bovine subunit b is shown for comparison.

(0.79 MB PDF)

Figure S5

Phylogenetic tree inferred for subunit β by Bayesian analysis. Numbers near branch nodes indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities/maximum likelihood bootstrap support (200 replicates). Branches with less than 0.5 posterior probability have been collapsed to a common node. The bar at the lower left indicates the scale in number of substitutions per site. Phylogenetic trees for subunits δ and d are shown in Texts S1 and S2, respectively.

(0.04 MB PDF)

Tabe S1

Summary of proteins identified by mass spectrometric analysis of peptides in bands excised from BN-PAGE gels and spots excised from 2-D BN-PAGE gels.

(0.11 MB XLS)

Table S2

Sequences, MS parameters, and deduced parent proteins of peptides identified by LC/MS/MS analysis of bands excised from BN-PAGE gels.

(0.27 MB XLS)

Table S3

Sequences, MS parameters, and deduced parent proteins of peptides identified by LC/MS/MS analysis of spots excised from 2-D BN-PAGE gels.

(0.37 MB XLS)

Table S4

T. thermophila mitochondrial proteins identified in spots 1–5 excised from 2-D BN-PAGE. The peptides detected by LC/MS/MS (Tables S1S3) belonging to each of the 60 proteins detected are highlighted within their amino acid sequences.

(0.09 MB DOC)

Table S5

gi identification numbers of proteins used in phylogenetic analyses.

(0.04 MB XLS)

Text S1

Supplemental results: proposed revision of gi:118355322/trembl:Q22ZH1/Hypothetical protein TTHERM_01094890 and identification as putative T. thermophila ATP synthase delta subunit.

(0.79 MB PDF)

Text S2

Supplemental results: proposed revision of gi:89295266/trembl:Q239R1/Hypothetical protein TTHERM_01188360 and identification as putative T. thermophila ATP synthase Fo d subunit.

(2.17 MB PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank colleagues in the Vaidya lab as well as in the Center for Molecular Parasitology for discussions and general cheer. We thank Hans-Peter Braun for discussion and advise on BN-PAGE, and Anand Mehta for providing initial help with proteomic analysis. We also thank the Technical Implementation and Coordination Core of The Johns Hopkins NHLBI Proteomics Center for the LTQ MS/MS analysis. T. thermophila strain SB210 used in this study was obtained from the National Tetrahymena Stock Center located at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

Abbreviations

BN
blue native
LC/MS/MS
Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry also known as Liquid Chromatography-tandem Mass Spectrometry
MIB
mitochondria isolation buffer
mtDNA
mitochondrial DNA
ORF
open reading frame
PAGE
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Footnotes

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

PBN, MWM, and ABV were supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants AI028398 and AI053148 to ABV, as well as by Drexel University College of Medicine. NVD and EJB received support from the Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research. JEV acknowledges support from the NHLBI Proteomic Initiative (NO-HV-28120), and NIH (P01HL081427). LAK was a recipient of the American Heart Association Pre-doctoral Fellowship (0715247U). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Abrahams J. P, Leslie A. G, Lutter R, Walker J. E. Structure at 2.8 A resolution of F1-ATPase from bovine heart mitochondria. Nature. 1994;370:621–628. [PubMed]
2. Junge W, Sielaff H, Engelbrecht S. Torque generation and elastic power transmission in the rotary F(O)F(1)-ATPase. Nature. 2009;459:364–370. [PubMed]
3. Menz R. I, Walker J. E, Leslie A. G. Structure of bovine mitochondrial F(1)-ATPase with nucleotide bound to all three catalytic sites: implications for the mechanism of rotary catalysis. Cell. 2001;106:331–341. [PubMed]
4. Kagawa R, Montgomery M. G, Braig K, Leslie A. G, Walker J. E. The structure of bovine F1-ATPase inhibited by ADP and beryllium fluoride. EMBO J. 2004;23:2734–2744. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Boyer P. D. New insights into one of nature's remarkable catalysts, the ATP synthase. Mol Cell. 2001;8:246–247. [PubMed]
6. Boyer P. D. The ATP synthase–a splendid molecular machine. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997;66:717–749. [PubMed]
7. Collinson I. R, van Raaij M. J, Runswick M. J, Fearnley I. M, Skehel J. M, et al. ATP synthase from bovine heart mitochondria. In vitro assembly of a stalk complex in the presence of F1-ATPase and in its absence. J Mol Biol. 1994;242:408–421. [PubMed]
8. Walker J. E, Dickson V. K. The peripheral stalk of the mitochondrial ATP synthase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1757:286–296. [PubMed]
9. Gardner M. J, Hall N, Fung E, White O, Berriman M, et al. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2002;419:498–511. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Pain A, Renauld H, Berriman M, Murphy L, Yeats C. A, et al. Genome of the host-cell transforming parasite Theileria annulata compared with T. parva. Science. 2005;309:131–133. [PubMed]
11. Brayton K. A, Lau A. O, Herndon D. R, Hannick L, Kappmeyer L. S, et al. Genome sequence of Babesia bovis and comparative analysis of apicomplexan hemoprotozoa. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:1401–1413. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030148. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Pain A, Bohme U, Berry A. E, Mungall K, Finn R. D, et al. The genome of the simian and human malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi. Nature. 2008;455:799–803. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Eisen J. A, Coyne R. S, Wu M, Wu D, Thiagarajan M, et al. Macronuclear genome sequence of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a model eukaryote. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040286. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Sogin M. L, Morrison H. G, Hinkle G, Silberman J. D. Ancestral relationships of the major eukaryotic lineages. Microbiologia. 1996;12:17–28. [PubMed]
15. Sogin M. L, Silberman J. D. Evolution of the protists and protistan parasites from the perspective of molecular systematics. Int J Parasitol. 1998;28:11–20. [PubMed]
16. Cavalier-Smith T, Chao E. E. Phylogeny of choanozoa, apusozoa, and other protozoa and early eukaryote megaevolution. J Mol Evol. 2003;56:540–563. [PubMed]
17. Conklin K. A, Chou S. C. Isolation and characterization of Tetrahymena pyriformis GL mitochondria. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1972;41:45–54. [PubMed]
18. Kilpatrick L, Erecińska M. Mitochondrial respiratory chain of Tetrahymena pyriformis: the properties of submitochondrial particles and the soluble b and c type pigments. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977;462:515–530. [PubMed]
19. Turner G, Lloyd D, Chance B. Electron transport in phosphorylating mitochondria from Tetrahymena pyriformis strain ST. J Gen Microbiol. 1971;65:359–374. [PubMed]
20. Kruger K, Grabowski P. J, Zaug A. J, Sands J, Gottschling D. E, et al. Self-splicing RNA: autoexcision and autocyclization of the ribosomal RNA intervening sequence of Tetrahymena. Cell. 1982;31:147–157. [PubMed]
21. Greider C. W, Blackburn E. H. The telomere terminal transferase of Tetrahymena is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme with two kinds of primer specificity. Cell. 1987;51:887–898. [PubMed]
22. Brownell J. E, Zhou J, Ranalli T, Kobayashi R, Edmondson D. G, et al. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell. 1996;84:843–851. [PubMed]
23. Unitt M. D, Lloyd D. Effects of inhibitors on mitochondrial adenosine triphosphatase of Tetrahymena pyriformis ST. J Gen Microbiol. 1981;126:261–266. [PubMed]
24. St-Pierre J, Brand M. D, Boutilier R. G. Mitochondria as ATP consumers: cellular treason in anoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:8670–8674. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Peachman K. K, Lyles D. S, Bass D. A. Mitochondria in eosinophils: functional role in apoptosis but not respiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:1717–1722. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Traba J, Froschauer E. M, Wiesenberger G, Satrustegui J, Del Arco A. Yeast mitochondria import ATP through the calcium-dependent ATP-Mg/Pi carrier Sal1p, and are ATP consumers during aerobic growth in glucose. Mol Microbiol. 2008;69:570–585. [PubMed]
27. Brown S. V, Hosking P, Li J, Williams N. ATP synthase is responsible for maintaining mitochondrial membrane potential in bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei. Eukaryot Cell. 2006;5:45–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Vasilyeva E. A, Fitin A. F, Minkov I. B, Vinogradov A. D. Kinetics of interaction of adenosine diphosphate and adenosine triphosphate with adenosine triphosphatase of bovine heart submitochondrial particles. Biochem J. 1980;188:807–815. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Vázquez-Acevedo M, Cardol P, Cano-Estrada A, Lapaille M, Remacle C, et al. The mitochondrial ATP synthase of chlorophycean algae contains eight subunits of unknown origin involved in the formation of an atypical stator-stalk and in the dimerization of the complex. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2006;38:271–282. [PubMed]
30. Krause F, Reifschneider N. H, Goto S, Dencher N. A. Active oligomeric ATP synthases in mammalian mitochondria. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329:583–590. [PubMed]
31. Bisetto E, Di Pancrazio F, Simula M. P, Mavelli I, Lippe G. Mammalian ATP synthase monomer versus dimer profiled by blue native PAGE and activity stain. Electrophoresis. 2007;28:3178–3185. [PubMed]
32. Börnhovd C, Vogel F, Neupert W, Reichert A. S. Mitochondrial membrane potential is dependent on the oligomeric state of F1F0-ATP synthase supracomplexes. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:13990–13998. [PubMed]
33. Villavicencio-Queijeiro A, Vázquez-Acevedo M, Cano-Estrada A, Zarco-Zavala M, Tuena de Gómez M, et al. The fully-active and structurally-stable form of the mitochondrial ATP synthase of Polytomella sp. is dimeric. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2009;41:1–13. [PubMed]
34. Stock D, Leslie A. G, Walker J. E. Molecular architecture of the rotary motor in ATP synthase. Science. 1999;286:1700–1705. [PubMed]
35. Dudkina N. V, Heinemeyer J, Keegstra W, Boekema E. J, Braun H. P. Structure of dimeric ATP synthase from mitochondria: an angular association of monomers induces the strong curvature of the inner membrane. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:5769–5772. [PubMed]
36. Dudkina N. V, Sunderhaus S, Braun H. P, Boekema E. J. Characterization of dimeric ATP synthase and cristae membrane ultrastructure from Saccharomyces and Polytomella mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:3427–3432. [PubMed]
37. Boekema E. J, Braun H. P. Supramolecular structure of the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:1–4. [PubMed]
38. Dudkina N. V, Heinemeyer J, Sunderhaus S, Boekema E. J, Braun H. P. Respiratory chain supercomplexes in the plant mitochondrial membrane. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:232–240. [PubMed]
39. Dudkina N. V, Oostergetel G. T, Lewejohann D, Braun H. P, Boekema E. J. Row-like organization of ATP synthase in intact mitochondria determined by cryo-electron tomography. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1797:272–277. [PubMed]
40. Dudkina N. V, Eubel H, Keegstra W, Boekema E. J, Braun H. P. Structure of a mitochondrial supercomplex formed by respiratory-chain complexes I and III. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:3225–3229. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Peters K, Dudkina N. V, Jansch L, Braun H. P, Boekema E. J. A structural investigation of complex I and I+III2 supercomplex from Zea mays at 11–13 A resolution: assignment of the carbonic anhydrase domain and evidence for structural heterogeneity within complex I. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1777:84–93. [PubMed]
42. Smith D. G, Gawryluk R. M, Spencer D. F, Pearlman R. E, Siu K. W, et al. Exploring the mitochondrial proteome of the ciliate protozoon Tetrahymena thermophila: direct analysis by tandem mass spectrometry. J Mol Biol. 2007;374:837–863. [PubMed]
43. Burger G, Zhu Y, Littlejohn T. G, Greenwood S. J, Schnare M. N, et al. Complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Tetrahymena pyriformis and comparison with Paramecium aurelia mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Biol. 2000;297:365–380. [PubMed]
44. Hampl V, Hug L, Leigh J. W, Dacks J. B, Lang B. F, et al. Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic “supergroups”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:3859–3864. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Schierwater B, Eitel M, Jakob W, Osigus H. J, Hadrys H, et al. Concatenated analysis sheds light on early metazoan evolution and fuels a modern “urmetazoon” hypothesis. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000020. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Burki F, Shalchian-Tabrizi K, Minge M, Skjaeveland A, Nikolaev S. I, et al. Phylogenomics reshuffles the eukaryotic supergroups. PLoS One. 2007;2:e790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000790. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Zikova A, Schnaufer A, Dalley R. A, Panigrahi A. K, Stuart K. D. The F(0)F(1)-ATP synthase complex contains novel subunits and is essential for procyclic Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000436. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000436. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Hermolin J, Dmitriev O. Y, Zhang Y, Fillingame R. H. Defining the domain of binding of F1 subunit epsilon with the polar loop of F0 subunit c in the Escherichia coli ATP synthase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:17011–17016. [PubMed]
49. Pogoryelov D, Nikolaev Y, Schlattner U, Pervushin K, Dimroth P, et al. Probing the rotor subunit interface of the ATP synthase from Ilyobacter tartaricus. FEBS J. 2008;275:4850–4862. [PubMed]
50. Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol. 1997;271:511–523. [PubMed]
51. Weigt M, White R. A, Szurmant H, Hoch J. A, Hwa T. Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:67–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Cross R. L, Müller V. The evolution of A-, F-, and V-type ATP synthases and ATPases: reversals in function and changes in the H+/ATP coupling ratio. FEBS Lett. 2004;576:1–4. [PubMed]
53. Dudkina N. V, Kouril R, Peters K, Braun H. P, Boekema E. J. Structure and function of mitochondrial supercomplexes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 In press. [PubMed]
54. Rabl R, Soubannier V, Scholz R, Vogel F, Mendl N, et al. Formation of cristae and crista junctions in mitochondria depends on antagonism between Fcj1 and Su e/g. J Cell Biol. 2009;185:1047–1063. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Allen R. D, Schroeder C. C, Fok A. K. An investigation of mitochondrial inner membranes by rapid-freeze deep-etch techniques. J Cell Biol. 1989;108:2233–2240. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Muench S. P, Huss M, Song C. F, Phillips C, Wieczorek H, et al. Cryo-electron microscopy of the vacuolar ATPase motor reveals its mechanical and regulatory complexity. J Mol Biol. 2009;386:989–999. [PubMed]
57. Numoto N, Hasegawa Y, Takeda K, Miki K. Inter-subunit interaction and quaternary rearrangement defined by the central stalk of prokaryotic V1-ATPase. EMBO Rep. 2009;10:1228–1234. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Brunk C. F, Lee L. C, Tran A. B, Li J. Complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Tetrahymena thermophila and comparative methods for identifying highly divergent genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:1673–1682. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Moradian M. M, Beglaryan D, Skozylas J. M, Kerikorian V. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of three tetrahymena species reveals mutation hot spots and accelerated nonsynonymous substitutions in Ymf genes. PLoS One. 2007;2:e650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000650. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Lang B. F, Burger G, O'Kelly C. J, Cedergren R, Golding G. B, et al. An ancestral mitochondrial DNA resembling a eubacterial genome in miniature. Nature. 1997;387:493–497. [PubMed]
61. Vaidya A. B, Mather M. W. Mitochondrial evolution and functions in malaria parasites. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:249–267. [PubMed]
62. Nash E. A, Nisbet R. E, Barbrook A. C, Howe C. J. Dinoflagellates: a mitochondrial genome all at sea. Trends Genet. 2008;24:328–335. [PubMed]
63. Abrahamsen M. S, Templeton T. J, Enomoto S, Abrahante J. E, Zhu G, et al. Complete genome sequence of the apicomplexan, Cryptosporidium parvum. Science. 2004;304:441–445. [PubMed]
64. Xu P, Widmer G, Wang Y, Ozaki L. S, Alves J. M, et al. The genome of Cryptosporidium hominis. Nature. 2004;431:1107–1112. [PubMed]
65. Meisinger C, Sommer T, Pfanner N. Purification of Saccharomcyes cerevisiae mitochondria devoid of microsomal and cytosolic contaminations. Anal Biochem. 2000;287:339–342. [PubMed]
66. Kobayashi T, Endoh H. A possible role of mitochondria in the apoptotic-like programmed nuclear death of Tetrahymena thermophila. FEBS J. 2005;272:5378–5387. [PubMed]
67. Wittig I, Braun H. P, Schägger H. Blue native PAGE. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:418–428. [PubMed]
68. Zerbetto E, Vergani L, Dabbeni-Sala F. Quantification of muscle mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation enzymes via histochemical staining of blue native polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis. 1997;18:2059–2064. [PubMed]
69. Werhahn W, Braun H. P. Biochemical dissection of the mitochondrial proteome from Arabidopsis thaliana by three-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2002;23:640–646. [PubMed]
70. Sunderhaus S, Eubel H, Braun H. P. Two-dimensional blue native/blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the characterization of mitochondrial protein complexes and supercomplexes. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;372:315–324. [PubMed]
71. Pullman M. E, Penefsky H. S, Datta A, Racker E. Partial resolution of the enzymes catalyzing oxidative phosphorylation. I. Purification and properties of soluble dinitrophenol-stimulated adenosine triphosphatase. J Biol Chem. 1960;235:3322–3329. [PubMed]
72. Gundry R. L, White M. Y, Murray C. I, Kane L. A, Fu Q, et al. Preparation of proteins and peptides for mass spectrometry analysis in a bottom-up proteomics workflow. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter. 2009;10:Unit10.25. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Thompson J. D, Gibson T. J, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins D. G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Armougom F, Moretti S, Poirot O, Audic S, Dumas P, et al. Expresso: automatic incorporation of structural information in multiple sequence alignments using 3D-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W604–608. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:511–518. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J. P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–1574. [PubMed]
77. Huelsenbeck J. P, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback J. P. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science. 2001;294:2310–2314. [PubMed]
78. Whelan S, Goldman N. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18:691–699. [PubMed]
79. Rodríguez F, Oliver J. L, Marín A, Medina J. R. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J Theor Biol. 1990;142:485–501. [PubMed]
80. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696–704. [PubMed]
81. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368–376. [PubMed]
82. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. [PubMed]
83. Altschul S. F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E. W, Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. [PubMed]
84. Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, et al. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W5–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
85. Seshadri R, Kravitz S. A, Smarr L, Gilna P, Frazier M. CAMERA: a community resource for metagenomics. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e75. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050075. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
86. Smith T. F, Waterman M. S. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol. 1981;147:195–197. [PubMed]
87. Finn R. D, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:D211–222. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
88. Sadreyev R, Grishin N. COMPASS: a tool for comparison of multiple protein alignments with assessment of statistical significance. J Mol Biol. 2003;326:317–336. [PubMed]
89. Sonnhammer E. L. L, Heijne G. v, Krogh A. A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. In: Glasgow J, Littlejohn T, Major F, Lathrop R, Sankoff D, et al., editors. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press; 1998. pp. 175–182.
90. Kahsay R. Y, Gao G, Liao L. An improved hidden Markov model for transmembrane protein detection and topology prediction and its applications to complete genomes. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:1853–1858. [PubMed]
91. Viklund H, Elofsson A. Best alpha-helical transmembrane protein topology predictions are achieved using hidden Markov models and evolutionary information. Protein Sci. 2004;13:1908–1917. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
92. Bernsel A, Viklund H, Falk J, Lindahl E, von Heijne G, et al. Prediction of membrane-protein topology from first principles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:7177–7181. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
93. Bryson K, McGuffin L. J, Marsden R. L, Ward J. J, Sodhi J. S, et al. Protein structure prediction servers at University College London. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W36–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
94. Jones D. T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol. 1999;292:195–202. [PubMed]
95. Angevine C. M, Herold K. A, Vincent O. D, Fillingame R. H. Aqueous access pathways in ATP synthase subunit a. Reactivity of cysteine substituted into transmembrane helices 1, 3, and 5. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:9001–9007. [PubMed]
96. Waterhouse A. M, Procter J. B, Martin D. M, Clamp M, Barton G. J. Jalview Version 2–a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–1191. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
97. Zhang Y, Fillingame R. H. Subunits coupling H+ transport and ATP synthesis in the Escherichia coli ATP synthase. Cys-Cys cross-linking of F1 subunit epsilon to the polar loop of F0 subunit c. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:24609–24614. [PubMed]
98. Meier T, Polzer P, Diederichs K, Welte W, Dimroth P. Structure of the rotor ring of F-Type Na+-ATPase from Ilyobacter tartaricus. Science. 2005;308:659–662. [PubMed]
99. Rodgers A. J, Wilce M. C. Structure of the gamma-epsilon complex of ATP synthase. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7:1051–1054. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Biology are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Compound
    Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Protein
    Protein
    Published protein sequences
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...