• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of narLink to Publisher's site
Nucleic Acids Res. Jun 2010; 38(10): 3362–3375.
Published online Feb 3, 2010. doi:  10.1093/nar/gkq025
PMCID: PMC2879508

A novel antisense RNA regulates at transcriptional level the virulence gene icsA of Shigella flexneri


The virulence gene icsA of Shigella flexneri encodes an invasion protein crucial for host colonization by pathogenic bacteria. Within the intergenic region virA-icsA, we have discovered a new gene that encodes a non-translated antisense RNA (named RnaG), transcribed in cis on the complementary strand of icsA. In vitro transcription assays show that RnaG promotes premature termination of transcription of icsA mRNA. Transcriptional inhibition is also observed in vivo by monitoring the expression profile in Shigella by real-time polymerase chain reaction and when RnaG is provided in trans. Chemical and enzymatic probing of the leader region of icsA mRNA either free or bound to RnaG indicate that upon hetero-duplex formation an intrinsic terminator, leading to transcription block, is generated on the nascent icsA mRNA. Mutations in the hairpin structure of the proposed terminator impair the RnaG mediated-regulation of icsA transcription. This study represents the first evidence of transcriptional attenuation mechanism caused by a small RNA in Gram-negative bacteria. We also present data on the secondary structure of the antisense region of RnaG. In addition, alternatively silencing icsA and RnaG promoters, we find that transcription from the strong RnaG promoter reduces the activity of the weak convergent icsA promoter through the transcriptional interference regulation.


Until recently, bacterial gene expression was believed to be regulated essentially by repressor or activator proteins acting mainly at the level of transcription initiation. At present, ~140 bacterial small (50–500 nt) regulatory RNAs, that do not encode proteins (ncRNAs), have been identified by means of systematic computer analysis, microarrays and cloning-based screening (1). Recently, a database collecting the small RNA (sRNA) genes has become available (2). sRNAs have been characterized not only in bacteria but also in phages, plasmids and in eukaryotic cells (microRNAs and interfering RNAs), suggesting that this level of regulation is widespread among living organisms (3). Although the function of many sRNAs remains to be elucidated, current studies indicate that they act by three general mechanisms. Few sRNAs are integral parts of the RNA–protein complexes as the 4.5S RNA component of the signal recognition particle and the RNase P RNA. A second class of regulatory sRNAs is represented by the so-called ‘molecular decoys’, which mimic the structure of other nucleic acids. Their target is usually a protein rather than another RNA (examples are the 6S RNA and the CsrB/CsrC RNAs). The non-coding RNAs of the third class are the best known and act by basepairing (RNA as antisense) with a second RNA, usually a messenger RNA, to change its behavior. Regulatory sRNAs can be encoded either in cis by the opposite strand of the target mRNA or by a free-standing gene located far from the target gene. Different RNA–RNA mediated mechanisms, entailing changes in processing and degradation of the target message and alterations in the efficiency of transcription and translation, have been described (3–7). It is becoming increasingly evident that sRNAs, besides gene regulation in general, can also play a key role in controlling the expression of virulence genes or can affect adaptive stress-responses, which are important for bacteria to survive into the host. Indeed, recent studies have identified sRNAs in human pathogens as Listeria monocytogenes (8,9), Staphylococcus aureus (10), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11), Salmonella (12–14) and Vibrio cholerae (15–18). Interestingly, in Escherichia coli, the majority of sRNAs are present in pathogenic strains, suggesting that they might control virulence.

Shigella flexneri is a Gram-negative pathogenic bacterium that causes human bacillary dysentery. The icsA gene (named also virG) of Shigella, located on the 230-kb virulence plasmid pINV, (19), encodes a protein required for the invasion of intestine epithelial cells and intercellular spread of pathogens (20). IcsA, one of the biggest proteins (1102 amino acid residues) in bacteria, is an outer membrane protein, which induces host actin polymerization at one pole of the cell, resulting in actin-tail formation which propels the bacterium from one cell to another (21). As most plasmid virulence genes, the expression of icsA is modulated by temperature and repressed by the nucleoid protein H-NS (22–26). In contrast to other genes of the invasivity regulon, icsA is not submitted to the VirF–VirB regulatory cascade but seems to be activated only by the AraC-like transcriptional effector VirF (27,28).

In this study, we have identified and characterized the first regulatory RNA encoded by the virulence plasmid of S. flexneri. This small RNA (named RnaG), acting as antisense, is 450 nt long and is transcribed from the complementary strand of the target icsA mRNA. We show that two mechanisms contribute to the RnaG-mediated regulation of icsA: (i) icsA and RnaG promoters, sponsoring convergent transcription, are subjected to transcriptional interference (TI) regulation defined as the direct negative impact of a transcriptional process on a second transcriptional process in cis (29); and (ii) RnaG is capable to interact with the icsA mRNA and to cause premature termination of transcription of the target gene possibly by a transcriptional attenuation mechanism. Chemical and enzymatic RNA probing experiments show that the RNA–RNA interaction induces a change of the secondary structure of the leader region of the icsA transcript, promoting the formation of an alternative spatial conformation resembling a Rho-independent terminator. Mutations, which destabilize the conserved stem structure of this intrinsic terminator, significantly affect the ability of the RnaG to inhibit icsA transcription in vitro. The secondary structure of the antisense region (~120 nt) of RnaG was also determined by chemical probing. To our knowledge, this is the first strong evidence of such a mechanism in a human life-threatening bacterial pathogen.


Bacterial strains and general procedures

Bacterial strains used in this work were Shigella flexneri M90T (20) and E. coli K-12 DH10b [mcrA Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) ΔlacX74 deoR recA1] (30), P90C [ara D(lac-pro) thi] (31) and HMG11 [araD139, Δ(ara, leu)7697, Δ(lacZ) M15, galU, galK, strA] (32). DNA isolation, agarose gel electrophoresis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), restriction digestions, cloning and other DNA manipulation methods were performed according to standard procedures (30). Plasmid pKK232-8 was from Pharmacia. Beta-galactosidase assays were performed as described by Miller (33) on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)–chloroform-permeabilized cells grown in LB broth (pH 7). Antibiotics and chemicals were used at the following concentrations: ampicillin 50 µg/ml; cloramphenicol 25 µg/ml; trimethoprim 10 µg/ml; Xgal 20 µg/ml. Radioactivity associated with DNA or RNA was detected and quantified by Molecular Imager (Bio-Rad, model FX). Oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.
Desoxyoligonucleotides used in this study

DNA manipulations

pGT1127 has been constructed by cloning into pGEMT-Easy a 866-bp fragment obtained upon PCR amplification with oligo pair AH16 and GZ25 using as template pMYSH6601, a pBR322-derived vector containing the virA-icsA genetic region (4.472 kb) of the S. flexneri 2a virulence plasmid pMYSH6000 (34). In order to study the intrinsic activity of PicsA and PRnaG promoters without the effect induced by the convergent promoter activity, we inactivated either PRnaG or PicsA, thus giving rise to PicsA/RnaGmut and PicsAmut/RnaG. The PicsA/RnaGmut (silenced RnaG promoter) was obtained by the three-round PCR approach using the wild-type icsA-virA regulatory region of pMYSH6601 as template. Oligos AH16 and RM10 were used as primers in the first reaction round (PCR-1), while oligos FM10 and GZ25 served as primers in PCR-2. Equimolar amounts of fragments from PCR-1 and PCR-2 were used as templates in PCR-3, primed by the oligos pair AH16 and GZ25. The 866-bp fragment thus obtained was cloned into pGEMT-Easy, giving rise to pGT1129. Sequencing confirmed the presence of PRnaG modified in the –10 region (5′-TGTGTT-3′) (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.
Identification of the RnaG promoter. (A) Primer extension analysis was carried out using the oligo G+59 on 10 µg of total RNA from the E. coli wt strain HMG11, a MC1029 derivative, transformed with plasmid pMYSH6601 (lane 2) or pKG673 (lane 3). ...

The PicsAmut/RnaG (silenced icsA promoter) was obtained by introducing a NdeI restriction site into the –10 consensus box. To this end, the two amplicons obtained from the icsA-virA region of pMYSH6601 with the oligos pairs AH16 and GRNdeI or GFNdeI and GZ25 were digested with NdeI and ligated to each other. The resulting 866-bp fragment was cloned into pGEMT-Easy to obtain pGT1083; sequence analysis confirmed the presence of a modified –10 region (5′-CATATG-3′) into the PicsA promoter (Figure 1B).

Plasmid pKG673 has been constructed by cloning into the BamHI site of pKK232-8 a 673-bp DNA fragment (from positions –262 to +419) amplified by PCR using the primer pair GZ24 and GZ25 and pMYSH6601 DNA as template.

Plasmids pTZRnaG, pTZRnaG120 and pTZicsA370 were obtained by cloning, into the HindIII/EcoRI restriction sites of pTZ19R, under the control of the T7 promoter, the RnaG gene (from positions –383 and –14 to +120) and the leader region of icsA (from positions +1 to +370), respectively. These DNA fragments were obtained by PCR using pMYSH6601 as DNA template and the following primer pairs G+120H/G-383E, G+120H/G-14E and G+1H/G+370E. EcoRI linearized plasmids, pTZRnaG, pTZRnaG120 and pTZicsA370 were used as templates in in vitro transcription reactions with T7 RNA polymerase as described by Brandi et al. (35) to synthesize RnaG, RnaG120 and icsA transcripts.

Substitution of four bases on icsA sequence (from positions +81 to +84), to produce the icsA81/4 mutant, was carried out by the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) using pGT1129 DNA as template and the mutagenic oligos G501 and G502. The resulting plasmid pGT1129M was used in in vitro transcription assay. The mutation was confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Construction of transcriptional fusions

Plasmids carrying fusions with the lacZ reporter gene were constructed by cloning different PCR-generated fragments into the multicloning site of the lacZYA transcriptional fusion vector pRS415 (33). Plasmid pULS1127, containing the PicsAlacZ fusion, was obtained by cloning a 866-bp EcoRI–BamHI fragment generated using AH16 and GZ25 as forward and reverse primers and pMYSH6601 as template. Plasmid pULS1287, containing the PRnaGlacZ fusion, was generated by cloning a 580-bp BamHI-BglII fragment obtained using GZ25 and AC8 as forward and reverse primers, respectively, and pMYSH6601 as template. Plasmid pULS1129, carrying the PicsA/RnaGmut-lacZ fusion, and plasmid pULS1288, carrying the PicsAmut/RnaG-lacZ fusion, were obtained with the oligo pairs used for the construction of the corresponding wt fusions but using plasmids pGT1129 and, respectively, pGT1083 as templates. The aforementioned lacZ fusions were then transferred by homologous recombination to the lac transducing phage λRS45, and then integrated (31) into the chromosome of E. coli P90C at the λ attachment site, thus generating strains ULS1127, ULS1129, ULS1287 and UL1288 (Figure 2B). Monolysogens were selected by means of a PCR test using primers corresponding to sequences flanking the bacterial and prophage attachment sites (36).

Figure 2.
Transcriptional Interference regulates icsA and RnaG promoter activity. (A) About 200 ng of supercoiled plasmids pGT1127 (PicsA/RnaG), pGT1129 (PicsA/RnaGmut) and pGT1083 (PicsAmut/RnaG), schematically represented in Figure 1C, were used as templates ...

Primer extension analysis

After an initial denaturation of RNA samples at 80°C for 5 min, primer extension analysis was carried out at 42°C for 45 min in reaction mixtures (10 µl) containing the supplied buffer, 0.1 mM dNTP mix, 3 U of AMV reverse transcriptase (Roche) and 3 pmol of [γ−32P]-oligo as primer. The reaction products were analyzed on 7% PAGE-urea gel in parallel with the dideoxy chain termination sequencing reaction using the same primer (30).

Mapping the 3′-end of the RnaG

Poly(A) tails were added to the 3′-termini of RNA using the E. coli enzyme poly(A) polymerase (GE Healthcare). The reaction (50 μl) was carried out at 37°C for 45 min in 40 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.7, 10 mM MgCl2, 250 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 50 µg/ml BSA, 2.5 mM MnCl2, 250 µM ATP, 5 U of poly(A) polymerase and 15 µg of total RNA extracted from E. coli strain HMG9/pMYSH6601. The reaction was stopped at 75°C for 10 min in the presence of EDTA (f.c. 20 mM), RNA was precipitated and then dissolved in 15 µl of water. Aliquots of poly(A)-tailed RNA were used to synthesize a cDNA copy. RNA was denaturated at 65°C for 5 min and subsequently the reaction (10 µl) was carried out at 42°C for 45 min in 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 8 mM MgCl2, 30 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 150 µM dNTPs, 60 pmol anchored oligo(dT19N)20 and 15 U of AMV reverse transcriptase (Roche). The resulting cDNAs were used as templates in PCR reaction performed with 130 pmol of the anchored oligo(dT14VN) and 30 pmol of the icsA specific oligo G-112 as primers. The amplicon obtained after 40 PCR cycles was subjected to sequencing using the oligo G-220 as primer.

In vitro transcription assay

In vitro transcription from supercoiled pGT1127, pGT1129 and pGT1083 as DNA templates was carried out at the indicated temperature for 45 min. Each reaction mixture (40 µl) contained 40 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.01% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM each of NTPs, 2 U of ribonuclease inhibitor and 0.2 U of E. coli RNA polymerase (USB). The reaction was stopped on ice and RNA was precipitated with ethanol in the presence of 1-µg tRNA as carrier. Concerning transcription assays shown in Figure 7, RnaG was added to the mixture before RNA polymerase (samples B) or at the step of RNA precipitation (samples E). This protocol ensures that the same amount of RnaG is present in the couple B/E during the following elongation step by the reverse transcriptase. The transcripts were subjected to primer extension as described above. Alternatively, in vitro transcription was performed incorporating [α−32P]-UTP in the de novo synthesized RNA. DNA template (10–20 ng) were transcribed in a volume of 15 µl in the same conditions indicated above in the presence of 200 µM CTP, 10 µM UTP, 1 mM ATP, 200 µM GTP and 0.2 µCi/µl [α−32P]-UTP (3000 Ci/mmol). After an incubation of 30 min at 37°C, the reaction was stopped by adding an equal volume of a solution containing 50% formamide and 10 mM EDTA and heated at 90°C for 2 min.

Figure 7.
The mutation icsA81/4 abolishes the RnaG-mediated transcriptional termination. (A) The hairpin followed by a polyU sequence typical of Rho-independent transcription terminators and base exchanges to create the icsA81/4 mutated mRNA are shown. The underlined ...

Chemical and enzymatic RNA probing

Chemical modification of RNA was performed as described previously (37) using the single-strand specific reagents DMS (A and C specific) and CMCT (U and G specific).The RNA was incubated for 5 min in 20 µl of buffer A (50 mM Na-cacodylate, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl) or 20 min in 20 µl of buffer B (50 mM Na-borate, pH 8, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl) at 32°C in the presence of the indicated concentrations of DMS or CMCT, respectively. Control samples were treated identically with the exception that no modifying reagents were added. The modified RNA was subjected to primer extension as described above.

To perform enzymatic probing, purified icsA370 mRNA was dephosphorylated using calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Amersham) and labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase (USB) and [γ-32P]-ATP (30).The 5′-end-labeled RNA was additionally extracted from gel (PAGE). After denaturation at 90°C for 1 min and renaturation for 10 min at 32°C, RNA was treated with RNases T1 or T2 (5 min) at the indicated concentrations in 10 µl buffer A (20 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl) in the presence of 1 µg of carrier tRNA. The reaction products were analyzed on 10% PAGE-urea gel in parallel with ΔT1 and OH– ladders (38).

Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted as described by Von Gabain et al. (39) and cDNA synthesis was performed using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit from Applied Biosystems. The 20-µl reaction mix contained 20 µg total RNA from Shigella M90T. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed on a 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) in a 30-µl reaction mix containing 5 µl cDNA and Power SYBR®Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). At least three wells were run for each sample. The relative amounts of icsA and RnaG transcripts were analyzed using the 2–ΔΔCt method (40) and the results were indicated as an n-fold increase relative to the starting sample, which was chosen as reference. Primers for the nusA transcript, used as endogenous control, and for the above-mentioned transcripts were designed with the aid of the Primer Express® software v2.0 (Applied Biosystems) and experimentally validated for suitability to the 2–ΔΔCt method. The following oligos were used: naF and naR for the nusA transcript; iaF and iaR for icsA; rgF and rgR for RnaG.


Identification and molecular characterization of the RnaG

While cloning different DNA fragments carrying the promoter and part of the coding region of icsA gene of S. flexneri into the vector pKK232-8, we observed that the expression of the promoter-less reporter gene cat was detected independently of the correct orientation of the icsA promoter (PicsA). This suggested the existence of at least two convergent promoters, transcribed on different DNA strands, within the icsA DNA sequence. In agreement with this finding, primer extension analysis reveals the presence of a promoter, named PRnaG, with reverse orientation relative to icsA (Figure 1A). Transcripts originated with two guanines at position +120 and, albeit to a much lesser extent, at position +118 with respect to the transcriptional start site of icsA (+1) previously identified by Lett et al. (34). The consensus hexamers –10 and –35 and the transcriptional start sites of PicsA and PRnaG are shown in Figure 1B. In addition, we prepared a set of different constructs in which the promoters of icsA and RnaG were alternatively inactivated by introducing mutations in the corresponding –10 elements to produce plasmids pGT1127, pGT1129 and pGT1083, schematically shown in Figure 1C. Promoter functioning was tested by primer extension analysis, carried out on total RNA extracted from E. coli cells transformed with the pGT plasmids. As expected, Figure 1D reveals that base exchanges at PRnaG and PicsA dramatically impair RnaG and icsA promoter activity, respectively. It is remarkable that the level of icsA mRNA is significantly higher when the RnaG promoter is inactivated (pGT1129) than in the wt condition (pGT1127). Moreover, transcription of icsA is increased at 37 as compared to 30°C. Although in silico analysis of the DNA sequence indicates the existence of a short open reading frame (31 amino acid residues) in the virA-icsA intergenic region, no β-galactosidase activity could be detected from translational fusions of this DNA region with the reporter gene lacZ (data not shown). Altogether, these observations strongly suggest the presence of a non-coding antisense RNA (RnaG) encoded in cis on the opposite strand of icsA and complementary to the first 120 nt of the mRNA.

The full length of RnaG has been determined by mapping the 3′ end of the transcript. Since bacteria do not usually show poly(A)+ RNA, a tail of adenines was incorporated in vitro to the 3′ end of total RNA using the poly(A) polymerase. Subsequently, a cDNA copy was made using the anchored oligo(dT19N) as primer. The DNA was then subjected to PCR amplification combining the anchored oligo(dT14VN) and a specific one designed on icsA as primers. Finally, the amplification product was sequenced (Supplementary Figure S1AB). The nucleotide sequence indicates that transcription possibly terminates between cytosine at position –332 and adenine at position –334 so that RnaG would be ~450 nt long. Because of the presence of two As at the 3′-end of the transcript, that are not distinguishable from those incorporated during the poly(A) tail synthesis, we could not identify the transcription termination site with single base accuracy. Northern blot analysis confirms the estimated size of RnaG (Supplementary Figure S1C). In agreement with the experimental results, computer prediction of secondary structure of the 3′-end of RnaG shows that it might form two hairpin loops characteristic of ‘Tandem/U shaped’ intrinsic terminators (41) (Supplementary Figure S1D). It is important to notice that the same transcriptional termination site was also found when RnaG was transcribed in vitro, using the wt plasmid pGT1127 as template (data not shown), suggesting that no other factors contribute to RNA polymerase pausing and leading to termination of transcription.

The icsA and RnaG promoters are subjected to TI regulation

The icsA and RnaG promoters are convergent and 120 bp apart. This arrangement can possibly give rise to TI, which refers to a direct negative influence of one transcriptional process on a second transcriptional process occurring in cis. Usually the strong promoter (aggressive) reduces the activity of the weaker convergent promoter (sensitive) (29). To assess whether TI plays a role in the regulation of icsA and eventually to establish which promoter is the sensitive or the aggressive one, we used plasmids pGT1127, pGT1129 and pGT1083 (Figure 1C). These constructs were transcribed in vitro and the icsA and RnaG transcripts were detected by primer extension. As shown in Figure 2A, when the wt construct pGT1127 is used as template only the RnaG transcript is visible and no transcription originates from PicsA. The icsA mRNA becomes evident when pGT1129, lacking an active PRnaG, is provided as template. This observation suggests that transcription from the strong RnaG promoter (aggressive) dramatically inhibits transcription from the weaker icsA promoter (sensitive). The interference, calculated as ratio of RnaG (pGT1083) and icsA (pGT1129) promoter activity, is ~12-fold. Moreover, TI is reciprocal since also transcription of PicsA negatively affects, albeit at low extent, that of the PRnaG. In fact, the level of the RnaG transcript is ~1.5-fold higher in pGT1083 carrying an impaired icsA promoter, than in the wt construct pGT1127.

TI between the PicsA and PRnaG has been further analyzed in vivo by constructing a series of transcriptional fusions carrying the lacZ reporter gene under the control of either icsA and RnaG promoters (Figure 2B). PicsA and PRnaG transcription was assayed using a λ-based single-copy chromosomal lacZ operon fusion system. As shown in Figure 2C, inactivation of PRnaG causes a ~3.5-fold increase of the expression of the ULS1129 fusion as compared to that of the wt construct ULS1127, thus confirming that RnaG transcription negatively interferes with PicsA transcription. On the other hand inactivation of PicsA gives rise only to a slightly enhanced β-gal level from PRnaG (compare ULS1288 and ULS1287). By measuring the levels of β-gal expression of ULS1288 and ULS1129 fusions, which do not account for TI effects, it appears evident that PRnaG is endowed with ~3-fold stronger transcriptional activity than PicsA. Altogether, these results clearly indicate that TI contributes to the coordinate regulation of this genetic system.

RnaG downregulates icsA by transcription attenuation

To investigate on the possible effect of RnaG on icsA transcription, we cloned the DNA sequence coding for this antisense RNA into pTZ19R. The recombinant plasmid (pTZRnaG) was used to synthesize RnaG by in vitro run-off transcription with T7 RNA polymerase. After purification, RnaG was added to an in vitro transcription assay programmed with a 331-bp DNA fragment carrying the icsA promoter and an impaired PRnaG. As seen in Figure 3A, the band representing the full-length run-off transcript of icsA (F) suddenly disappears even in the presence of low amounts of RnaG (200 fmol). Concomitantly, a shorter product of ~100 nt (T) is formed and its level progressively increases, becoming the only transcript detectable at higher RnaG concentrations. This result suggests that the antisense RNA may promote transcription termination of the target gene by a transcriptional attenuation mechanism. Such hypothesis is strengthened by the lack of the truncated RNA molecule (T) when the icsA81/4 mRNA, carrying mutations in the potential intrinsic terminator (see below), is transcribed (Figure 3B). Under the same experimental conditions, the promoter activity of a control gene (hns) is not affected by RnaG (Figure 3C).

Figure 3.
The RnaG downregulates icsA transcription. Transcription was investigated in vitro as function of increasing amounts of purified RnaG using as template a 331-bp DNA fragment (from position –117 to +214), corresponding to the wt icsA promoter ( ...

The role played by RnaG in the modulation of icsA transcription has been further investigated in vivo by introducing extra copies of RnaG into ULS1129, a λR45 mono lysogen strain carrying a PicsAlacZ fusion with an inactivated RnaG promoter (Figure 2B). As shown in Figure 4A, synthesis of RnaG from pGT1127 or pGT1083 plasmids impairs the full expression of the chromosomal PicsA, giving rise to a ~3-fold reduction of β-gal level, thus confirming that, when provided in trans, RnaG is able to inhibit icsA transcription. This result depends on the presence of the RnaG molecule, since no repression is observed transforming the cells with the pGT1129 which carries a silenced PRnaG. By means of a real-time quantitative PCR assay (QPCR), we also compared the level of icsA mRNA in S. flexneri M90T strain carrying either pGT1083 or the pGEMT cloning vector. The presence of RnaG encoding plasmid (pGT1083) gives rise to a 40% reduction of icsA mRNA (data not shown) in agreement with the result obtained in ULS1129 background. Moreover, to support the control effect of RnaG on icsA transcription, we decided to monitor the relative expression of icsA and RnaG in S. flexneri M90T strain throughout the growth curve by a QPCR assay. As shown in Figure 4B, during the exponential growth, RnaG expression remains fairly constant, while icsA expression shows a progressive increase. Interestingly, approaching the stationary phase (OD600 nm =1) RnaG expression shows a sharp increase immediately followed by an abrupt decrease of icsA expression, thus supporting the hypothesis that RnaG hampers the full expression of icsA gene.

Figure 4.
RnaG negatively affects icsA expression. (A) Expression of icsA-lacZ fusion USL1129 was monitored in cells transformed with pGT1083, pGT1127, pGT1129 or pGEMT vectors. (B) The in vivo level of icsA and RnaG transcripts was monitored during the growth ...

Convergent transcription from face-to-face promoters, as in the case of this genetic system, produces two transcripts that partially basepair, possibly originating a RNA duplex. The potential interaction between icsA and RnaG transcripts was monitored by primer extension analysis performed, in the presence or in the absence of purified RnaG, on bulk RNA extracted from an E. coli HMG11 strain harboring the pGT1129, which synthesizes only the icsA mRNA. We find that, in the absence of RnaG, the 5′ terminus matches with the previously identified transcriptional start point of icsA (34). By contrast, upon adding RnaG, the canonical start point of icsA is apparently moved from position +1 to position +108 (Figure 5A). Assuming that the 5′ leader region of the icsA mRNA interacting with the RnaG yields a peculiar secondary structure, which prevents the elongation of the cDNA by the enzyme reverse transcriptase, we investigated on the secondary structure of the icsA transcript by RNA probing. Initially, the purified 5′ terminus (~370 nt) of the icsA mRNA was treated with the two single-strand specific reagents dimethyl sulfate (DMS modifies unpaired adenines and cytosines) and 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinoethyl) carbodiimide metho-p-toluene sulfonate (CMCT modifies unpaired uridines and guanines) (42). Data obtained by chemical probing (Figure 5B) were superimposed on a computer prediction generated by the MFOLD program (43). A model of the structural organization of the first 145 nt of free icsA mRNA is presented in Figure 5E. This RNA, particularly its 5′-end, forms a pronounced secondary structure which is composed of a very long hairpin motif (AH1) and a second helix containing both an apical and an internal loop (AH2). Conversely, the 3′-end of the icsA mRNA, downstream residue 110, is highly accessible to chemical modification, indicating that this region of the molecule is single stranded. Next, we probed the structure of the icsA mRNA together with the RnaG. As seen in Figure 5C and Supplementary Figure S3, in the presence of RnaG, an extended region (~80 nt) of the 5′ terminus of the icsA mRNA is no longer exposed to CMCT and DMS modification, particularly the unpaired nucleotides forming the apical loop (U31–U34, A28), the uridine 24 and the adenine 51 of AH1. This strongly suggests that an RnaG–icsA mRNA duplex is formed. Differently, the non-folded intervening sequence (A68, C70, U72) between AH1 and AH2, the apical loop (A86–A91) and the bulged structure of AH2 (U77–A79 and A96–U102) remain still accessible to the modifying agents even adding a 2-fold excess of RnaG (Figures 5C and S3, lanes 7 and 8), indicating that nucleotides 80–120, although complementary to RnaG, are less important for RNA pairing. The icsA mRNA structure obtained by chemicals was confirmed by enzymatic RNA probing with T1 and T2 ribonucleases (Figure 5D). This technique was also used to analyzed the structure of icsA mRNA in the presence of the RnaG. Depending on the amount of RnaG added, cleavages produced by these two single-stranded RNA specific enzymes at level of motifs AH1 (G30–G36, U50) and AH2 (U79, A86–A89), on icsA transcript, are clearly reduced or even hardly detectable, while no difference is observed with or without RnaG downstream U111. RNA probing experiments combined with MFOLD predictions and the in vitro synthesis of a incompletely extended icsA mRNA (Figure 3A) suggest that the progressive complementation between the nascent transcript and the RnaG hinders proper folding of helices AH1 and AH2 (at least in part), thereby inducing structural changes in the leader region of sense RNA. Such an alternative organization of the icsA mRNA has the potential to form a stem–loop structure, characteristic of a Rho-independent terminator (Figure 7A), which is likely responsible to promote premature termination of the nascent icsA transcript by an antisense RNA-mediated transcriptional attenuation mechanism (44). The proposed model is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 5.
RNA probing of the icsA mRNA leader region either alone or in combination with RnaG. (A) Total RNA (15 μg) was primer-extended in the absence or in the presence of the indicated amounts of purified RnaG using the oligo ACC9. (B) In vitro transcribed ...
Figure 6.
Model showing the RnaG-mediated transcriptional attenuation mechanism. (A) The interactions of GH3 and GH2 with AH1 possibly provide the initial nucleation points leading to duplex formation between RnaG and icsA mRNA. The GH1 hairpin is not represented ...

To verify the validity of our model, we mutagenized the pGT1129 creating the pGT1129M plasmid which carries a four-base substitution at positions 81–84 on icsA and encodes the mutated icsA81/4 mRNA (Figure 7A). This mutation was designed to destabilize the stem structure of the intrinsic terminator possibly formed, during the icsA mRNA tramscription, upon interaction with the antisense RnaG. As previously shown in Figure 3B, transcription of the icsA81/4 mRNA was not able to originate the truncated product in the presence of RnaG. Thus, we further analyzed the effect of this mutation by means of a technically different in vitro transcription assay programmed with supercoiled plasmid DNA. The icsA transcript was monitored by primer extension using a [32P]-labeled oligo recognizing only untruncated transcripts. Since we found that the binding of RnaG to icsA mRNA can interfere with elongation by reverse transcritpase (Figure 5A), RnaG was added either at beginning (B) or at the end (E) of the in vitro transcription reaction. We devised this protocol to properly discriminate the negative effects, caused by RnaG, on transcription from those on the following elongation step. Therefore, this procedure has an internal control. As seen in Figure 7B, RnaG mostly represses transcription of the wt icsA (lanes B) without significantly affecting the primer extension detection (lanes E). Transcription inhibition is also observed using a shorter form of RnaG, named RnaG120, containing only the first 120 nt, suggesting that the antisense region plays a key role in controlling icsA synthesis (Supplementary Figure S2). The study of deletion mutants of RnaG is actually in progress. On the contrary, under the same experimental conditions, RnaG is not able to cause transcription termination (except at the highest amount tested), when the mutated icsA81/4 mRNA is synthesized (Figure 7C). The different response of icsA and icsA81/4 mRNAs to the RnaG-mediated control is clearly evidenced when transcription is expressed as the ratio B/E (Figure 7D). These results strengthen the proposed model based on transcriptional attenuation mechanism. Moreover, we analyzed the secondary structure of RnaG and actually the antisense region (nucleotides 1–120) has been elucidated. As seen in Figure 8, the 5′-end of RnaG is characterized by three stem–loop motifs indicated as GH1–GH3 that might play a role in the initial pairing with the icsA mRNA.

Figure 8.
Secondary structure of the antisense region of RnaG. (A) Chemical probing of RnaG has been carried out essentially as described in Figure 5B, using the oligo G + 1H, in the presence of increasing amounts of DMS (lane 1, 0%; lane 2, 0.3%; lane 0.6%) and ...


During the past decade, small non-coding RNAs have been discovered in all organisms. A major role of these ncRNAs, acting by basepairing to their target mRNAs, is primarily to regulate translation and messengers stability (3,6). In bacteria, antisense RNA were first detected on extrachromosomal elements as plasmids, transposons and bacteriophages (45); however, now it is becoming increasingly clear that most of the chromosomally encoded small RNAs (sRNAs) are part of regulatory circuits required for fast adaptive response to stress and environmental changes (46). The invasion of a host by a pathogenic microorganism, which results in reprogramming of the transcriptional activity, implies a prompt adaptation to new growth conditions related to the transition from a free living to a host-associated state. In this context, 19 novel island-encoded sRNAs have been recently identified in Salmonella and several of these genes are expressed under stress conditions when bacteria reside within macrophages (13). Thus, RNA–RNA interactions appear decisive for virulence.

In the present study, we have identified a novel gene encoding an antisense RNA (RnaG), located within the icsA sequence of the S. flexneri virulence plasmid (pINV). The icsA gene (also known as virG) encodes a structural protein involved in the reorganization of the cytoskeleton upon penetration of bacteria into host cells and its activity is crucial for the intra- and inter-cellular spreading of the bacterial pathogen (20). After mapping the 5′- and 3′- ends of RnaG, we focused on its ability to regulate the expression of icsA. Recent studies have shown that many sRNAs, acting as antisense RNA, modulate the synthesis of outer membrane proteins, thereby controlling the surface composition of Gram-negative bacteria (12,47,48). IcsA is indeed an outer membrane protein and RnaG represents a novel example of this type of regulation. As opposed to other sRNAs and specifically to those which control membrane proteins expression, affecting mostly the ability of target mRNAs to be translated, we found that the RnaG is capable to downregulate icsA transcription through dual not mutually exclusive mechanisms.

We have shown that icsA and RnaG promoters are subjected to TI regulation. TI provides an additional platform for gene regulation and it has been described in phages, transposable elements, plasmids, bacteria, yeast but less frequently in higher eukaryotes. The main mechanisms, by which TI can occur, are: (i) occlusion in which the passage of elongating RNA polymerases (RNAPs) blocks the access to the promoter; (ii) collisions between elongating RNAPs, moving in opposite directions, leading the premature termination of transcription; and (iii) ‘sitting duck’ interference which refers to the removal of promoter-bound complexes by the passage of RNAP from the opposing promoter (29). We have found that the activity of PicsA is significantly reduced when a transcription process starts from the convergent PRnaG, indicating that this phenomenon plays a key role in the regulation of icsA (Figure 2). The extent of TI is higher in vitro (~12-fold) than in vivo (~3–4-fold), suggesting that other factors (i.e. regulatory proteins), and, not simply the promoter strength, could contribute to the regulation of this genetic system into bacterial cells. Indeed, E. coli strains used in this assay express the chromosomal protein H-NS acting as icsA repressor, but not its natural activator VirF (see below) carried by the large pINV virulence plasmid. At present, our results do not allow us to figure out which type of the three aforementioned mechanisms is likely to be the major contributor to the overall TI and this will be the aim of further investigations. To our knowledge, we believe that RnaG is the first example of a non-coding RNA, which negatively affects transcription of the target gene by TI mechanism.

In addition to TI inhibition, RnaG can also cause a direct repression of icsA transcription acting primarily as antisense RNA by targeting the icsA messenger. Such a negative effect on icsA promoter activity is observed both in S. flexneri and in E. coli and when the RnaG is provided in trans. In particular, the analysis of the expression trend of RnaG during the growth of S. flexneri reveals that a marked RnaG increase toward the onset of the stationary phase is followed by a rapid reduction of the icsA transcript (Figure 4). In vitro transcription assays programmed with a linear DNA fragment containing PicsA display, solely in the presence of the RnaG, the appearance of an abortive product of ~100 nt in place of the full-length transcript. The truncated molecule is not formed when the mutation 81/4, abolishing the function of the transcriptional terminator, is introduced in the icsA mRNA (Figure 3). Additionally, transcription termination mediated by RnaG is observed also when a supercoiled plasmid, carrying icsA, is used as template. In fact, the shortened icsA mRNA can not be primer-extended with the G+110 oligo, which fails to pair with its target sequence on icsA mRNA, resulting in the reduction and/or disappearance of the signal as function of RnaG concentration (Figure 7). Although, RnaG binds and exerts its inhibitory effect apparently without helper proteins, Hfq and/or other chaperonins (49) might influence the in vivo RnaG-dependent regulation of icsA. The inhibition of PicsA is highly specific since it is completely abolished in cells not expressing RnaG due to inactivation of promoter and transcription of the control gene hns is not affected in vitro even by adding RnaG at elevated concentrations.

Combining computational predictions and data from chemical and enzymatic RNA probing (Figures 5 and S3), we have demonstrated that binding of RnaG to the target icsA mRNA alters the secondary structure of the untranslated region of the sense RNA. Not all of the antisense region (120 nt) of RnaG seems required to elicit this structural change. Particularly, nucleotides downstream position 80 on icsA mRNA display a significant high reactivity to modifying agents even in the presence of the antisense RNA, indicating that the first 40 nt of RnaG are not stably interacting with icsA transcript. Indeed, we propose that as the formation of the RNA–RNA hybrid proceeds (~80 nt), the hairpins AH1 and AH2 (in part) are not properly folded and the icsA mRNA adopts a different conformation. This alternate structure, which originates in the course of the transcription process but only in the presence of RnaG, gives rise to an intrinsic terminator in the nascent messenger that likely leads to premature termination of icsA synthesis (Figure 6). The location of the terminator (between position +78 and +105) is fully consistent with the size of the truncated transcript (~100 nt) deduced from in vitro transcription assays and with the RnaG-mediated shortening of cDNA in the primer extension experiment. The proposed model is also strengthened by the considerably reduced capability of RnaG to stop transcription and to generate an abortive product with the icsA81/4 mutant, which is impaired in forming the stem structure characteristic of functional intrinsic terminators (Figures 3 and and7).7). It is remarkable that RNA probing experiments provide a static picture of final structure of the icsA–RnaG complex, generated by two molecules which are already synthesized, denatured and refolded together, conditions that facilitate their annealing through the entire complementary region. Moreover, little differences are obviously observed depending on the nature of agents used (chemicals or enzymes). For these reasons, in vitro transcription experiments represent the assay that closer mimics the in vivo condition because sense–antisense pairing likely occurs during icsA mRNA elongation and folding.

Recently, we also started to investigate on the secondary structure of free RnaG and so far the first 120 nt have been analyzed (Figure 8). Complete clarification of its structure is actually in progress. Inspection of the structural conformation of sense and antisense RNAs reveals that the unpaired bases of the apical loop (nucleotides 29–37) and of the basal bulge (nucleotides 57–61) of AH1 might basepair with loops GH3 (nucleotides 84–92) and GH2 (nucleotides 60–64), respectively. Analogously, the apical (nucleotides 85–91) and internal loops (nucleotides 98–102) of AH2 are complementary to single-stranded regions found in the topologically similar motif GH1 (nucleotides 30–36 and 18–22) of RnaG (Figures 5E and 8B). Possibly, these interactions provide the initial contact (kissing complex), which is followed by rapid helix progression leading to RNA–RNA hybrid formation. To date, this binding pathway was restricted to plasmid replication as in R1 and in ColE1 and to the regulation of insertion sequence IS10 (50). Transcription attenuation mechanism was first discovered many years ago in the replication control of the staphylococcal plasmid pT181 and of the streptococcal plasmids pIP501 and pAMβ1 (6,44). More recently, attenuation has been hypothesized also in the regulation of repABC genes involved in the replication of tumor-inducing plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (51), although the existence of a terminator, upon RNA–RNA interaction, was only predicted in silico. Thus, our study represents the first strong evidence of the occurrence of a transcription attenuation mechanism in genes from Gram-negative bacteria and not restricted to plasmids replication. Regulation of transcription by ncRNAs is certainly the less frequently adopted mode of action even if it constitutes a very powerful strategy to control the first step of the flow of genetic information. In this context, a subset of small RNAs associates directly with and regulates components of the transcription machinery. The best-studied example is the E. coli 6S RNA that inhibits transcription by competing for DNA interaction with the RNA polymerase (particularly with the 4.2 binding region of σ70), being recognized as a open promoter (52,53). Other non-coding RNAs have been found in eukaryotic cells targeting mostly the RNA polymerase (likely to the 6S RNA) and transcriptional factors (54).

RNA probing reveals that the AUG start codon and the ribosome binding site of the icsA messenger, located between positions +125 and +140, reside in a region that remains single stranded and thus these sites are presumably available for ribosome recognition. Moreover, the accessibility of this region to modifying agents and RNases does not significantly change also in the presence of RnaG once mRNA–RnaG hybrid is formed (Figure 5). Although further studies are needed to better understand the complex regulation of icsA, these observations do not support the hypothesis that RnaG, in addition to transcription, may also control the expression of the target gene at post-transcriptional level. Alternatively, we cannot exclude that the long duplex between sense and antisense RNAs may represent a target for RNase III resulting in RNA degradation in vivo (6).

RnaG is one of largest regulatory sRNAs (450 nt long) so far identified and RNA probing of the 5′-end and in silico prediction show a high structured organization consisting of several stem–loop motifs. Importantly, a deleted form, RnaG120, containing only the antisense region still preserves its ability to represses icsA transcription in vitro (Supplementary Figure S3) as well as the entire RnaG indicating that the first 120 nt possibly represent a functional domain. In light of its complexity, RnaG, besides icsA, might be implicated in contacting and modulating the expression of other virulence genes. It is worth stressing that the 3′-end of RnaG overlaps the –35 promoter element of virA, an important virulence gene responsible for destroying host cell microtubules (55) and having its transcriptional start site reversely oriented (position –364) with respect to that of icsA. Possibly, transcription from RnaG promoter could affect the activity of the tandemly transcribed virA promoter interfering with the binding of the RNA polymerase and/or of its specific regulatory proteins through TI regulation mechanisms. In this context, a well-characterized example of a multiple target regulator is represented by RNAIII of S. aureus which turns on/off the expression of genes involved in pathogenesis in response to environmental and host signals (56).

The expression of icsA is subjected to a complex regulatory network that besides being affected by RnaG, depends also on the coordinated action of two regulators, VirF and H-NS (27,28). VirF is required to induce the synthesis of the IcsA protein at the permissive temperature of 37°C, a condition which the pathogen meets upon invading the host. Preliminary experiments performed in our laboratory show that VirF can stimulate the in vitro activity of PicsA while repressing that of PRnaG (unpublished data). Although several aspects of the regulation of icsA mediated by VirF, H-NS and RnaG are currently under investigation, it is reasonable to hypothesize that VirF positively affects icsA transcription both directly and by relieving the inhibitory effect caused by RnaG.

In the past few years, predictive bioinformatics searches have greatly facilitated the discovery of dozens of sRNAs in different species but identification of direct targets and understanding of their mechanistic aspects still lag behind. Elucidating the mode of action of novel non-coding sRNAs is obviously important, particularly in the light of their role in response to the host environment and during the infection process. This study contributes to provide a cleaner picture of the biological functions of antisense RNAs in human bacterial pathogens and clarifies some relevant aspects of the complex regulation of the invasion protein IcsA whose expression is critical for construction of attenuated vaccinal strains.


Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.


Funding for open access charge: Fondi Ateneo Ricerca (FAR) to M.F. and Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti to B. C.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

Supplementary Material

[Supplementary Data]


We are thankful to A. Giuliodori and G. Spedalieri for technical advices in the RNA probing methods and to C. Sasakawa for plasmid pMYSH6601. The critical reading of the manuscript and helpful discussion of S. Marzi, C.O. Gualerzi. M.L. Bernardini and G. Micheli are gratefully acknowledged.


1. Altuvia S. Identification of bacterial small non-coding RNAs: experimental approaches. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007;10:257–261. [PubMed]
2. Huang HY, Chang HY, Chou CH, Tseng CP, Ho SY, Yang CD, Ju YW, Huang HD. sRNA Map: genomic maps for small non-coding RNAs, their regulators and their targets in microbial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:(Database issue):D150–D154. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Gottesman S. The small RNA regulators of Escherichia coli: roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2004;58:303–328. [PubMed]
4. Gottesman S. Stealth regulation: biological circuits with small RNA switches. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2829–2842. [PubMed]
5. Storz G, Opdyke JA, Zhang A. Controlling mRNA stability and translation with small, noncoding RNAs. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2004;7:140–144. [PubMed]
6. Brantl S. Regulatory mechanisms employed by cis-encoded antisense RNAs. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007;10:102–109. [PubMed]
7. Repoila F, Darfeuille F. Small regulatory non-coding RNAs in bacteria: physiology and mechanistic aspects. Biol. Cell. 2009;101:117–131. [PubMed]
8. Christiansen JK, Nielsen JS, Ebersbach T, Valentin-Hansen P, Sogaard-Andersen L, Kallipolitis BH. Identification of small Hfq-binding RNAs in Listeria monocytogenes. RNA. 2006;12:1383–1396. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Mandin P, Repoila F, Vergassola M, Geissmann T, Cossart P. Identification of new noncoding RNAs in Listeria monocytogenes and prediction of mRNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:962–974. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Pichon C, Felden B. Small RNA genes expressed from Staphylococcus aureus genomic and pathogenicity islands with specific expression among pathogenic strains. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA. 2005;102:14249–14254. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Livny J, Waldor MK. Identification of small RNAs in diverse bacterial species. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007;10:96–101. [PubMed]
12. Pfeiffer V, Sittka A, Tomer R, Tedin K, Brinkmann V, Vogel J. A small non-coding RNA of the invasion gene island (SPI-1) represses outer membrane protein synthesis from the Salmonella core genome. Mol. Microbiol. 2007;66:1174–1191. [PubMed]
13. Padalon-Brauch G, Hershberg R, Elgrably-Weiss M, Baruch K, Rosenshine I, Margalit H, Altuvia S. Small RNAs encoded within genetic islands of Salmonella typhimurium show host-induced expression and role in virulence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:1913–1927. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Vogel J. A rough guide to the non-coding RNA world of Salmonella Mol. Microbiol. 2009;71:1–11. [PubMed]
15. Romby P, Vandenesch F, Wagner EGH. The role of RNAs in regulation of virulence-gene. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006;9:1–8.
16. Toledo-Arana A, Repoila F, Cossart P. Small noncoding RNAs controlling pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007;10:182–188. [PubMed]
17. Song T, Mika F, Lindmark B, Liu Z, Schild S, Bishop A, Zhu J, Camilli A, Johansson J, Vogel J, et al. A new Vibrio cholerae sRNA modulates colonization and affects release of outer membrane vesicles. Mol. Microbiol. 2008;70:100–111. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Liu JM, Livny J, Lawrence MS, Kimball MD, Waldor MK, Camilli A. Experimental discovery of sRNAs in Vibrio cholerae by direct cloning, 5S/tRNA depletion and parallel sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:e46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Buchrieser C, Glaser P, Rusniok C, Nedjari H, D'H;auteville H, Kunst F, Sansonetti P, Parsot C. The virulence plasmid pWR100 and the repertoire of proteins secreted by the type III secretion apparatus of Shigella flexneri. Mol. Microbiol. 2000;38:760–771. [PubMed]
20. Bernardini ML, Mounier J, d'H;auteville H, Coquis-Rondon M, Sansonetti PJ. Identification of icsA, a plasmid locus of Shigella flexneri that governs bacterial intra- and intercellular spread through interaction with F-actin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1989;10:3867–3871. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Goldberg MB. Actin–based motility of intracellular microbial pathogen. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2001;65:595–626. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Falconi M, Colonna B, Prosseda G, Micheli G, Gualerzi CO. Thermoregulation of Shigella and Escherichia coli EIEC pathogenicity. A temperature-dependent structural transition of DNA modulates accessibility of virF promoter to transcriptional repressor H-NS. EMBO J. 1998;17:7033–7043. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Prosseda G, Falconi M, Giangrossi M, Gualerzi CO, Micheli G, Colonna B. The virF promoter in Shigella: more than just a curved DNA stretch. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;51:523–537. [PubMed]
24. Stella S, Spurio R, Falconi M, Pon CL, Gualerzi CO. Nature and mechanism of the in vivo oligomerizzation of nucleoid protein H-NS. EMBO J. 2005;24:2896–2905. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Stella S, Falconi M, Lammi M, Gualerzi CO, Pon CL. Environmental control of the in vivo oligomerization of nucleoid protein H-NS. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;355:169–174. [PubMed]
26. Dorman CJ. H-NS, the genome sentinel. Nature Rev. 2007;5:157–161. [PubMed]
27. Dorman CJ, Porter ME. The Shigella virulence gene regulatory cascade: a paradigm of bacterial gene control mechanisms. Mol. Microbiol. 1998;29:677–684. [PubMed]
28. Prosseda G, Falconi M, Nicoletti M, Casalino M, Micheli G, Colonna B. Histone-like proteins and Shigella invasivity regulon. Res. Microbiol. 2002;153:461–468. [PubMed]
29. Shearwin KS, Callen BP, Egan JB. Transcriptional interference – a crash course. Trends Genet. 2005;21:339–345. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: CSHL Press; 2001.
31. Simons RW, Houman F, Kleckner N. Improved single and multicopy lac-based cloning vectors for protein and operon fusions. Gene. 1987;53:85–96. [PubMed]
32. Göransson M, Sondén B, Nilsson P, Dagberg B, Forsman K, Emanuelsson K, Uhlin BE. Transcriptional silencing and thermoregulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Nature. 1990;12:682–685. [PubMed]
33. Miller JH. A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1992.
34. Lett MC, Sasakawa C, Okada N, Sakai T, Makino S, Yamada M, Komatsu K, Yoshikawa M. virG, a plasmid-coded virulence gene of Shigella flexneri: identification of the VirG protein and determination of the complete coding sequence. J. Bacteriol. 1989;171:353–3599. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Brandi A, Pietroni P, Gualerzi CO, Pon CL. Post-transcriptional regulation of CspA expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 1996;19:231–240. [PubMed]
36. Powell BS, Rivas MP, Court DL, Nakamura Y, Turnbough C.L., Jr Rapid confirmation of single copy lambda prophage integration by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:5765–5766. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Holmberg L, Melander Y, Nygård O. Probing the structure of mouse Ehrlich ascites cell 5.8, 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA in situ. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:1374–1382. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Donis-Keller H, Maxam AM, Gilbert W. Mapping adenines, guanines, and pyrimidines in RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977;4:2527–2538. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. von Gabain A, Belasco JG, Schottel JL, Chang AC, Cohen SN. Decay of mRNA in Escherichia coli: investigation of the fate of specific segments of transcripts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1983;80:653–657. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. [PubMed]
41. Unniraman S, Prakash R, Nagaraja V. Conserved economics of transcription termination in eubacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:675–684. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Ehresmann C, Baudin F, Mongel M, Romby P, Ebel JP, Ehresmann B. Probing the structure of RNAs in solution. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:9109–9128. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Zuker M, Mathews DH, Turner DH. Algorithms and thermodynamics for RNA secondary structure prediction: a practical guide in RNA biochemistry and biotechnology. In: Barciszewski J, Clark B.FC, editors. NATO ASI Series. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999.
44. Brantl S. Antisense-RNA regulation and RNA interference. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2002;1575:15–25. [PubMed]
45. Wagner EG, Altuvia S, Romby P. Antisense RNAs in bacteria and their genetic elements. Adv. Genet. 2002;46:361–398. [PubMed]
46. Storz G, Altuvia S, Wassarman KM. An abundance of RNA regulators. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005;74:199–217. [PubMed]
47. Guillier M, Gottesman S, Storz G. Modulating the outer membrane with small RNAs. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2338–2348. [PubMed]
48. Vogel J, Papenfort K. Small non-coding RNAs and the bacterial outer membrane. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006;9:605–611. [PubMed]
49. Valentin-Hansen P, Eriksen M, Udesen C. The bacterial Sm-like protein Hfq: a key player in RNA transactions. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;51:1525–1533. [PubMed]
50. Wagner EGH, Brantl S. Kissing and RNA stability in antisense control of plasmid replication. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998;23:451–454. [PubMed]
51. Chai Y, Winans SC. A small antisense RNA downregulates expression of an essential replicase protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;56:1574–1585. [PubMed]
52. Wassarman KM. 6S RNA: a small RNA regulator of transcription. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007;10:164–168. [PubMed]
53. Cavanagh AT, Klocko AD, Liu X, Wassarman KM. Promoter specificity for 6S RNA regulation of transcription is determined by core promoter sequences and competition for region 4.2 of sigma70. Mol. Microbiol. 2008;67:1242–1256. [PubMed]
54. Barrandon C, Spiluttini B, Bensaude O. Non-coding RNAs regulating the transcriptional machinery. Biol Cell. 2008;100:83–95. [PubMed]
55. Yoshida S, Handa Y, Suzuki T, Ogawa M, Suzuki M, Tamai A, Abe A, Katayama E, Sasakawa C. Microtubule-severing activity of Shigella is pivotal for intercellular spreading. Science. 2006;10:985–989. [PubMed]
56. Boisset S, Geissmann T, Huntzinger E, Fechter P, Bendridi N, Possedko M, Chevalier C, Helfer AC, Benito Y, Jacquier A, et al. Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII coordinately represses the synthesis of virulence factors and the transcription regulator Rot by an antisense mechanism. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1353–1366. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Falconi M, Higgins NP, Spurio R, Pon CL, Gualerzi CO. Expression of gene encoding the major bacterial nucleoid protein H-NS is subject to transcriptional auto-repression. Mol. Microbiol. 1993;10:273–282. [PubMed]
58. Ermolaeva MD, Khalak HG, White O, Smith HO, Salzberg SL. Prediction of transcription terminators in bacterial genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2000;301:27–33. [PubMed]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...