Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2010; 5(5): e10698.
Published online May 19, 2010. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0010698
PMCID: PMC2873431

Identification of miRNA from Porphyra yezoensis by High-Throughput Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis

Sharyn Jane Goldstien, Editor

Abstract

Background

miRNAs are a class of non-coding, small RNAs that are approximately 22 nucleotides long and play important roles in the translational level regulation of gene expression by either directly binding or cleaving target mRNAs. The red alga, Porphyra yezoensis is one of the most important marine economic crops worldwide. To date, only a few miRNAs have been identified in green unicellar alga and there is no report about Porphyra miRNAs.

Methodology/Principal Findings

To identify miRNAs in Porphyra yezoensis, a small RNA library was constructed. Solexa technology was used to perform high throughput sequencing of the library and subsequent bioinformatics analysis to identify novel miRNAs. Specifically, 180,557,942 reads produced 13,324 unique miRNAs representing 224 conserved miRNA families that have been identified in other plants species. In addition, seven novel putative miRNAs were predicted from a limited number of ESTs. The potential targets of these putative miRNAs were also predicted based on sequence homology search.

Conclusions/Significance

This study provides a first large scale cloning and characterization of Porphyra miRNAs and their potential targets. These miRNAs belong to 224 conserved miRNA families and 7 miRNAs are novel in Porphyra. These miRNAs add to the growing database of new miRNA and lay the foundation for further understanding of miRNA function in the regulation of Porphyra yezoensis development.

Introduction

miRNAs are endogenous non-protein-coding RNAs, approximately 22 nucleotides (nt) in length, that negatively regulate gene expression by complementary binding to the ORF or UTR regions of target messenger RNAs. miRNAs are widespread in animals and plants including unicellular green alga [1], and their expression is highly regulated in a time-dependent and tissue-specific manner across species. Numerous studies have identified miRNAs and their functions in various biological and cellular processes [2], [3], [4]. Generally, their functions have been found to include organ development, cell differentiation and proliferation, cell death and cell apoptosis [3].

To date, a number of miRNAs have been discovered through bioinformatical and/or experimental approaches (cDNA cloning from size-fractionated RNA samples) in various plant species [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Most of these miRNAs are conserved across plant families [11]. However, there are species/family specific miRNAs. These specific miRNAs have evolved recently and comprise a smaller fraction of the small RNA library, compared to the conserved miRNAs [12]. Because non-conserved miRNAs frequently accumulate at a lower level than conserved miRNAs, traditional small-scale sequencing often misses the specific-miRNA, the same as most comparative methodologies, particularly when the miRNAs are evolving rapidly [12]. Recently, establishment of high-throughput technologies and deep sequencing analysis has allowed the identification of several miRNAs that are not conserved or are expressed in low levels, such as those found in Arabidopsis, rice, poplar, wheat and tomato [13], [14], [15], [16]. However, there is little information available regarding miRNA in algae, except recently published data describing the unicellar green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [1].

The marine red alga, Porphyra yezoensis has been proposed as a model marine plant for physiological and genetic studies of seaweed due to its biological and economic importance [17]. To date, no systematic studies of small RNA in red algae have been conducted. The goal of this study was to isolate miRNA from P. yezoensis, which will help us to identify the miRNA-based regulatory system of this red alga. High throughput Solexa technology was used to deep sequence the P. yezoensis small RNA library and then the sequencing data were analyzed. The miRNAs described here add to the growing database of novel miRNA.

Results

Sequence analysis of short RNAs

A cDNA library of short RNAs from P. yezoensis was sequenced using the Solexa system. A total of 18,057,942 reads were obtained from the sequencing machine. After removing adaptor/acceptor sequences, filtering out low quality tags and cleaning up the contamination formed by the adaptor-adaptor ligation, 9,738,608 (64.84%) clean reads were obtained, representing 3,425,015 unique sequences. Among the clean reads, 106,085 (1.1%) were found to be similar to known miRNAs. The rest of the sequences were found to be other types of RNA, including non-coding RNA, tRNA, rRNA, snRNA or snoRNA. The numbers and proportions of different categories of small RNAs are shown in Table 1. BLAST searches against P. yezoensis EST (above 13,000 ESTs) revealed that 1,089,417 small RNAs (11.19%) matched at least one EST.

Table 1
Distribution of small RNAs among different categories in P. yezoensis.

Because small RNAs with known function are commonly 20–24 nt long [16], we analyzed the unique size distribution patterns of small RNAs (Fig. 1). In Porphyra, it is observed that the majority of small RNA from Porphyra libraries were 22 nt in size (Fig. 1), followed by 22 nt, 19 nt and 20 nt, which is consistent with the typical size of miRNA from Dicer digestion products.

Figure 1
Lengths of unique small RNA sequences in P. yezoensis.

Known miRNAs and evolutionary conservation

To identity the known miRNAs in P. yezoensis, we compared our dataset to known miRNAs in miRBase 14.0 (http://www.mirbase.org/). Among the 9,378,608 sequences screened, 13,324 unique sequences were found to be orthologs of known miRNAs from other plant species that had previously been deposited in miRBase (version 14). Allowing one or two mismatches between sequences, these miRNAs represented 224 known miRNA families (Table S1). We analyzed the number of reads for conserved miRNAs and found it has large divergence in the expression frequency among these miRNAs. Among them, 15 miRNAs have relatively more sequence counts, indicating these miRNAs are highly expressed. For example, miR1520 and miR1507 were represented the most frequently in the library with 33,899 and 10,066 copies, respectively (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
Frequency of known miRNAs in P. yezoensis.

To investigate the evolutionary roles of these known miRNA, we performed extensive comparisons against known miRNAs in other plant species, including Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Physcomitrella patens, Selaginella moellendorffii, Oryza sativa, Arabidopsis thaliana, Glycine max, Populus trichocarpa, Triticum aestivum, Brassica napus, Medicago truncatula, Solanum lycopersicum, Brassica oleracea, Saccharum officinarum, Vitis vinifera, Zea mays, Sorghum bicolor, Gossypium hirsutum, Pinus taeda (Table S2). Among the miRNA sequences obtained from P. yezoensis, members in 53 out of 224 families show a lack of conservation of sequence identity when comparing to orthologs in 18 other plant species. Interestingly, P. yezoensis and C. reinhardtii shared 41 conserved miRNAs (Table S2), and 16 out of 41 miRNAs have no ortholog in other analyzed plants, indicating that these 16 miRNAs were probably involved in regulation of algae-specific processes, for example, adaptation to diverse aquatic environments. In addition, we found 54 miRNAs are conserved in P. yezoensis and Physcomitrella patens, and 26 out of 54 miRNAs only have orthologs in P. yezoensis and P. patens. For instance, the target gene of miRNA477 in P. patens has several different types of predicted functions (based on protein level sequence homology), including heat-shock protein related, MRP-domain ribosomal protein L29-like and Zinc-finger CCT-domain proteins. miR898 was reported as one of Physcomitrella-specific miRNA families which have identified target gene encoding proteins similar to protein kinases [18].

Novel P. yezoensis–specific miRNAs

One of the important features that distinguish miRNA from other small RNAs is the ability of the miRNA flanking sequences to fold-back in a hairpin structure [19]. Because the Porphyra genome is unknown, we have to rely on EST sequences to predict the hairpin structure. Our analysis revealed 1,089,417 sequences, each has at least one match in Porphyra EST sequences. BLASTN searches against the Rfam database, NCBI GenBank database and miRBase were conducted to remove sequences representing the fragments of non-coding RNAs (rRNA, tRNA small nuclear sequences and small nucleolar RNA), exons, introns and miRNA. The remaining 322,439 sequences containing small RNA sequences that were not associated with any annotation type were mapped to an EST for prediction of novel miRNA candidates.

Our search for new miRNAs revealed that 12 sequences that perfectly matched miRNA ESTs were able to fold into step-loop structures. Of these 12 sequences, seven were considered to be novel miRNA (Table 2). The lengths of these newly identified miRNA sequences were 21 or 22 nt, and they had negative folding free energies ranging from −86.2 to −22.5 kcal mol−1 according to Mfold. Additionally, the average free energies of these precursors was found to be about −41.7 kcal mol−1, which is much lower than land plant miRNA precursors (−71.0 kcal mol−1 in rice, −59.5 kcal mol−1 in Arabidopsis and −72.4 kcal mol−1 in wheat) [20]. To investigate the evolutionary conservation of the putative novel miRNAs, these were searched against the plant genome and ESTs data in KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/catalog/org_list.html), we found that only one novel miRNA (m0001) has sequence homologous to an unknown gene (CO533805) in Zea mays. This observation indicated that putative novel miRNA identified in this study may be species-specific in P. yezoensis, i.e. P. yezoensis-specific.

Table 2
7 novel miRNA predicted in P. yezoensis.

Prediction of miRNA targets in Porphyra

To understand the biological function of miRNAs in Porphyra, the putative target sites of the miRNA candidates were identified by aligning miRNA sequences to the ESTs of Porphyra while following the rules of target prediction suggested by Allen et al. (2005) [21]. The miRNA targets sites of plants have been shown to be primarily located in the coding regions [5], [6]. Consistent with these findings, most of the target sites are located in the coding regions. The putative target genes appear to be involved in a wide variety of biological processes. As shown in Fig. 3, EST sequences corresponding to the putative targets were classified according to the COG database. The predicted target genes included not only transcription factors, but also other genes involved in a broad range of physiological processes. However, we were unable to predict targets for four of the new miRNAs (m001, m002, m003, m005) using the above rules, which may have been due to the limited number of Porphyra Est sequences available in the databases. Finally, the predicted targets genes for three of the new miRNAs were novel and had unknown function.

Figure 3
COG function classification of the predicted target genes.

Discussion

It has been well established that RNAi plays an important role in the silencing of selfish genetic elements and in the formation of heterochromatin in plants, animals and fission yeast [22]. The diversification of small RNA pathways has been demonstrated and the miRNA pathway is known to be a conserved mechanism of gene regulation in eukaryotes [23]. However, this pathway has not been identified in many algae, with the exception of its recent identification in unicellular green algae [1].

The identification of entire sets of miRNAs and their targets will lay the foundation for elucidation of the complex miRNA-mediated regulatory networks that control development and other physiological processes. Most conserved plant miRNAs have been identified by traditional Sanger sequencing. The traditional sequencing method yields longer but less reads. However, the recently developed sequencing technology, Solexa (Illumina), generating shorter reads (up to 35 bp) but yielding 1–3 million reads per sample [24], is very useful to investigate microRNA expression profiles and identify novel miRNAs from new species. Because most miRNAs are only 21–23 nt, we used the Solexa technology to isolate miRNAs from the common seaweed P. yezoensis.

The aim of this study was to identify miRNAs present in P. yezoensis and miRNAs evolutionary conservation in other plants. When we searched for conserved miRNAs, we found that the Porphyra miRNAs have many homologs in higher plants including rice, wheat, Arabidopsis, soybean and so on. Also, deep sequencing of the small RNA library allowed identification of the expression levels of each member within a family. Sequence analysis revealed that the relative abundance of certain members within the miRNA families varied greatly, from one to nearly 35,000 copies. Among the conserved miRNAs, miR1520 topped the list of copy numbers with its variant having 33,899 copies but the annotation of its function is still not available. Conversely, miR839, miR1534, miR1445, miR1156 and miR777 appeared to have only one copy (Fig. 2). Our studies also defined these conserved miRNAs shared by other plants, ranging from unicellular algae to higher plants (Table S2), which will provide the opportunity to inspect the evolution of these families during the divergence of plants. 53 miRNA families were Porphyra-specific miRNAs. Among them, 17 miRNAs are only conserved in P. yezoensis and C.reinhardtii. These observations leave open the possibility that these miRNA families could have descended from a common ancestor and diverged or were lost during the diversification of land plants. It is possible that regulatory interactions directed by these algae-specific miRNA are involved in the adaptation to the diverse aquatic environment. Also, as expected based upon previous observations [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], we found some miRNAs conserved among several species. Since these miRNAs had been reported to remain constant during the diversification of land plants [30], we can infer the functions of miRNAs in P. yezoensis based on the functions known in land plants. For instance, miR156 directs the cleavage of two SBP box genes which has previously been demonstrated to be a miR156 target [26], [31]. Similarly, miR166 directs the cleavage of the five class III HD-ZIP genes that has been previously been observed to possess miR166 complementary sites [28]. In flowering plants, the miR159/319 family targets subsets of the MYB and TCP transcription factor gene families [32], [33], [34],[35]; miR319 from P. patens cleaved a gene with a cyclin domain in vivo at the predicted miR319 complementary site [30]. Although the miRNA regulatory pathways are currently unknown, the results of the present study suggest that significant functional differentiation of miRNAs occurs at different developmental stages and some miRNA regulatory mechanisms maybe similar in Porphyra and in higher plants.

Despite the lack of genomic sequences, the availability of ESTs helped us to identify seven novel Porphyra miRNAs. However, even those miRNAs with miRNA support may not satisfy all of the criteria; hence, some of the novel miRNAs reported here, require further investigation. Most targets of plant miRNAs have a miRNA-complementary site located in their coding regions and occasionally in their 3′ or 5′ UTRs [9], [5], [36], [37]. Consistent with these reports, Porphyra miRNAs are predicted to target coding regions. Many of the predicted miRNAs with annotated functions are involved in cellular metabolism and physiological process, whereas transcription factors appear to be under-represented. These findings are consistent with previous studies of Chlamydomonas, but contrast many plants in which miRNAs have a remarkable ability to target transcription factor gene families [36]. However, the Porphyra genome is not well studied and the EST sequences are limited. As a result, there is no information available regarding the function of a great proportion of protein-coding genes, which makes it difficult to determine if these miRNA targets have functional bias.

The putative novel Porphyra miRNAs targeted a number of genes that had no homology to other species' genes, suggesting that these genes may underlie Porphyra specific functions. Accordingly, additional studies are necessary to elucidate the role of miRNAs in P. yezoensis.

Materials and Methods

Strains and culture conditions

Filamentous sporophytes of P. yezoensis were grown in seawater medium [38] at 16°C with a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod in the laboratory for one week. Then, the materials were collected and cleaned with in sterilized water. After dried with hygroscopic filter paper, the samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C before use.

Small RNA library preparation and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from the filamentous sporophytes of P. yezoensis cultures using Trizol (Invitrogen). The samples were then subjected to 15% denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, after which the small RNA fragments of 18–28 nt were isolated from the gel and purified. Next, the small RNA molecules were ligated to a 5′ adaptor and a 3′ adaptor sequentially and then converted to DNA by RT-PCR. Finally, approximately 20 µg products of RT-PCR were sequenced directly using Solexa 1G Genome Analyzer according to the manufacturer's protocols (Beijing Genomics Institute, China) [39]. The sequenced short reads data have been deposited to the Short Read Archive section of GEO at NCBI under accession numbers GSE20534.

Small RNA analysis

After removing the adaptor/acceptor sequences, filtering the low quality tags and cleaning up the contamination formed by the adaptor-adaptor ligation, the occurrences of each unique sequence reads was counted as sequence tags. Then, there were compared with the sequences of non-coding RNAs (rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA) available in Rfam (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/software/Rfam) [40] and the GenBank noncoding RNA database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to classify degradation fragments of non-coding RNA. In addition, all sequences were searched for miRNA sequences using miRBase 14.0 [41] to identify the known miRNAs in P. yezoensis. Subsequently, we investigated the evolutionary conservation relationship of known miRNAs in P. yezoensis and other plants. If a known miRNA in P. yezoensis and other plants exhibits homology with less than two mismatches (or >90% homology) reciprocally, it was considered as evolutionary conservation. All small RNA fragments and the identified orthologs of known miRNAs from miRBase were screened from expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences using SOAP 2.0 program [42].

Prediction of novel miRNA

The prediction of Porphyra miRNAs was conducted using criteria that were previously developed for plant miRNA prediction [21]. miRNA precursors have characteristic fold-back structures that can be used to predict novel miRNAs. The prediction was implemented in the Mireap program developed by the BGI (Beijing Genome Institute). To identify atypical and novel sequences of miRNAs in P. yezoensis, we adopted the following strategy. First, candidate miRNA sites were screened out from breakpoints defined by mapping of the small RNAs. Next, a minimal stringent criterion was used to select miRNA candidates, which ensured that the majority of sequences recovered were known miRNAs. Finally, the RNA secondary structure was checked using Mfold [43].

Prediction of miRNA targets

The putative target sites of miRNA candidates were identified by aligning the miRNA sequences with the ESTs of Porphyra using custom Perl script. The rules used for target prediction were based on those suggested by Allen et al. (2005) [21] and Schwab et al. (2005) [44]. Specifically, the prediction was subject to the following rules: 1) No more than four mismatches between the small RNA and the target (G-U bases count as 0.5 mismatches); 2) No more than two adjacent mismatches in the miRNA: target duplex; 3) No adjacent mismatches in positions 2–12 of the miRNA: target duplex (5′ of miRNA); 4) No mismatches in positions 10–11 of the miRNA: target duplex; 5) No more than 2.5 mismatches in positions 1–12 of the of the miRNA: target duplex (5′ of miRNA); 6) The minimum free energy (MFE) of the miRNA/target duplex should be ≥74% of the MFE of the miRNA bound to its perfect complement. The functional category of obtained EST sequences was annotated against the COG database (http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/COG/) using BLAST program with a cutoff of E value <1e-5.

Supporting Information

Table S1

The putative miRNA families represented in P. yezoensis miRNA pool

(0.05 MB XLS)

Table S2

Evolutionary conservation of known P. yezoensis miRNAs in other plants. P. yezoensis miRNAs are orthologs of known miRNAs from other plants is indicated with “*”.

(0.05 MB XLS)

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiaorong Tang for providing P. yezoensis and Zhe Zhang for assistance with P. yezoensis growth.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40706050, 40706048 and 30700619), the National Science & Technology Pillar Program (2006BAD01A13 and 2008BAC49B04), National Special Fund for Transgenic Project (2009ZX08009-019B), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (2009ZRA02075 and 2008D03), Qingdao Municipal Science and Technology Plan Project (09-2-5-8-hy), Open Foundation of Chemical Engineering Subject, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, China and the Hi-TechResearch and Development Program (863) of China (2009AA10Z106). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Zhao T, Li G, Mi S, Li S, Hannon GJ, et al. A complex system of small RNAs in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genes& Development. 2007;21:1190–1203. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Borsani O, Zhu J, Verslues PE, Sunkar R, Zhu JK. Endogenous siRNAs derived from a pair of natural cis-antisense transcripts regulate salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2005;123:1279–1291. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. [PubMed]
4. Mette MF, Van der WJ, Matzke M, Matzke AJ. Short RNAs can identify new candidate transposable element families in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2002;130:6–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Sunkar R, Girke T, Zhu JK. Identification and characterization o fendogenous small interfering RNAs from Rice. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005;33:4443–4454. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Sunkar R, Zhu JK. Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:2001–2019. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Lu S, Sun YH, Shi R, Clark C, Li L, et al. Novel and mechanical stress-responsive MicroRNAs in Populus trichocarpa that are absent from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2186–2203. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Wang XJ, Reyes JL, Chua NH, Gaasterland T. Prediction and identification of Arabidopsis thaliana microRNAs and their mRNA targets. Genome Biology. 2004;5:R65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP. Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stressinduced miRNA. Molecular Cell. 2004;14:787–799. [PubMed]
10. Adai A, Johnson C, Mlotshwa S, Archer-Evans S, Manocha V, et al. Computational prediction of miRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Research. 2005;15:78–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Dezulian T, Palatnik J, Huson D, Weigel D. Conservation and divergence of microRNA families in plants. Genome Biology. 2005;6:13.
12. Rajagopalan R, Vaucheret H, Trejo J, Bartel DP. A diverse and evolutionarily fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Development. 2006;20:3407–3425. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Fahlgren N, Howell MD, Kasschau KD, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, et al. High-throughput sequencing of Arabidopsis micro-RNAs: evidence for frequent birth and death of MiRNA genes. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e219. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Barakat A, Wall PK, Diloreto S, Depamphilis CW, Carlson JE. Conservation and divergence of microRNAs in Populus. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:481. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Sunkar R, Zhou X, Zheng Y, Zhang W, Zhu JK. Identification of novel and candidate miRNAs in rice by high throughput sequencing. BMC Plant Biology. 2008;8:25. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Wei B, Cai T, Zhang R, Li A, Huo N, et al. Novel microRNAs uncovered by deep sequencing of small RNA transcriptomes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Brachypodium distachyon (L.) Beauv. Functional & Integrative Genomics. 2009;9:499–511v. DOI 10.1007/s10142-009-0128-9. [PubMed]
17. Saga N, Kitade Y. Porphyra: a model plant in marine sciences. Fish Science. 2002;68(Suppl):1075–1078.
18. Addo-Quaye C, Snyder JA, Park YB, L YF, SUNKAR R, et al. Sliced microRNA targets and precise loop-first processing of MIR319 hairpins revealed by analysis of the Physcomitrella patens degradome. RNA. 2009;15:2112–2121. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Ambros V, Bartel B, Bartel DP, Burge CB, Carrington JC, et al. A uniform system for microRNA annotation. RNA. 2003;9:277–279. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Yao YY, Guo GG, NI ZF, Sunkar R, Du JK, et al. Cloning and characterization of microRNAs from wheat(Triticumaestivum L.). Genome Biology. 2007;8:R96. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC. microRNA directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005;121:207–221. [PubMed]
22. Lippman Z, Martienssen R. The role of RNA interference in heterrochromatics silenceing. Nature. 2004;431:364–370. [PubMed]
23. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–223. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Glazov EA, Cottee PA, Barris WC, Moore RJ, Dalrymple BP, et al. A microRNA catalog of the developing chicken embryo identified by a deep sequencing approach. Genome Research. 2008;18(6):957–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Floyd SK, Bowman JL. Gene regulation: Ancient micro-RNA target sequences in plants. Nature. 2004;428:485–486. [PubMed]
26. Arazi T, Talmor-Neiman M, Stav R, Riese M, Huijser P, et al. Cloning and characterization of micro-RNAs from moss. Plant Journal. 2005;43(6):837–848. [PubMed]
27. Axtell MJ, Bartel DP. Antiquity of microRNAs and their targets in land plants. Plant Cell. 2005;17:1658–1673. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Floyd SK, Zalewski CS, Bowman JL. Evolution of class III homeodomain-leucine zipper genes in streptophytes. Genetics. 2006;173:373–388. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Fattash I, Voss B, Reski R, Hess WR, Frank W. Evidence for the rapid expansion of microRNA-mediated regulation in early land plant evolution. BMC Plant Biology. 2007;7:13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Axtell MJ, Snyder JA, Bartel DP. Common functions for diverse small RNAs of Land Plants. The Plant Cell. 2007;19:1750–1769. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Wu G, Poethig RS. Temporal regulation of shoot development in Arabidopsis Thaliana by mir156 and its target SPL3. Development. 2006;133(18):3539–3547. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Rhoades MW, Reinhart BJ, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel B, et al. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell. 2002;110:513–520. [PubMed]
33. Palatnik JF, Allen E, Wu X, Schommer C, Schwab R, et al. Control of leaf morphogenesis by micro-RNAs. Nature. 2003;425:257–263. [PubMed]
34. Schommer C, Palatnik JF, Aggarwal P, Chételat A, Cubas P, et al. Control of jasmonate biosynthesis and senescence by miR319 targets. PLoS Biology. 2008;6(9):e230. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Nag A, King S, Jack T. miR319a targeting of TCP4 is critical for petal growth and development in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2009;106(52):22534–22539. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Bartel B. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2006;57:19–53. [PubMed]
37. Bonnet E, Wuyts J, Rouze P, Van de PY. Detection of 91 potential conserved plant microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa identifies important target genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2004;101:11511–11516. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Provasoli L. Media and prospects for the cultivation of marine algae. In: Watanabe A, Hattori A, editors. Culture and collection of algae: Proceedings of US-Japan conference in Hakone. Tokyo: Japanese Society of Plant Physiologists; 1968. pp. 63–75.
39. Lau NC, Lim LP, Weinstein EG, Bartel DP. An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2001;294:858–862. [PubMed]
40. Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR, et al. Rfam: Annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005;33:D121–D124. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Griffiths-Jones S, Saini HK, van Dongen S, Enright AJ. miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Research, 2008;36:D154–D158. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam TW, Yiu SM, et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1966–1967. [PubMed]
43. Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31:3406–3415. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, et al. Specific Effects of MicroRNAs on the Plant Transcriptome. Developmental Cell. 2005;8:517–527. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...